Dexmedetomidine in Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy: A CONSORT-Prospective,Randomized, Controlled Trial

Both dexmedetomidine and sufentanil modulate spinal analgesia by different mechanisms, and yet no human studies are available on their combination for analgesia during the first 72 hours after abdominal hysterectomy.This CONSORT-prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of dexmedetomidine and sufentanil in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 72 hours after abdominal hysterectomy.Ninety women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were divided into 3 equal groups that received sufentanil (Group C; 0.02 μg/kg/h), sufentanil plus dexmedetomidine (Group D1; 0.02 μg/kg/h, each), or sufentanil (0.02 μg/kg/h) plus dexmedetomidine (0.05 μg/kg/h) (Group D2) for 72 hours after surgery in this double-blinded, randomized study. The primary outcome measure was the postoperative sufentanil consumption, whereas the secondary outcome measures were pain intensity (visual analogue scale), requirement of narcotic drugs during the operation, level of sedation, Bruggrmann comfort scale, and concerning adverse effects.The postoperative sufentanil consumption was significantly lower in Groups D1 and D2 than in Group C during the observation period (P < 0.05), but lower in Group D2 than in Group D1 at 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). The heart rate after intubation and incision was lower in Groups D1 and D2 than in Group C (P < 0.05). On arrival at the recovery room, Groups D1 and D2 had lower mean blood pressure than Group C (P < 0.05). The intraoperative requirement of sevoflurane was 30% lesser in Groups D1 and D2 than in Group C. The sedation levels were greater in Groups D1 and D2 during the first hour (P < 0.05). Compared with Groups C and D1, Group D2 showed lower levels of the overall incidence of nausea and vomiting (P < 0.05).Among the tested PCA options, the addition of dexmedetomidine (0.05 μg/kg/h) and sufentanil (0.02 μg/kg/h) showed better analgesic effect and greater patient satisfaction without other clinically relevant side effects for patients undergoing hysterectomy during the first 72 hours after abdominal hysterectomy.     

The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Myocardial Function Assessed by Tissue Doppler Echocardiography During General Anesthesia in Patients With Diastolic Dysfunction: A CONSORT-Prospective,Randomized, Controlled Trial

Dexmedetomidine is a commonly used sedative and adjuvant agent to general anesthesia. The present was designed to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine on myocardial function by using tissue Doppler echocardiography during general anesthesia in patients with diastolic dysfunction.Forty patients undergoing orthostatic surgery with ejection fraction preserved diastolic dysfunction grade 2 or 3 were randomly allocated to the Control and Dex group (n = 20, each). In the Dex group, dexmedetomidine was given as an initial loading dose of 1.0 μg/kg over 10 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 0.5 μg/kg/h. The ratio of peak early diastolic transmitral or transtricuspid inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral or tricuspid annular velocity (LV or RV E/e′) and left or right ventricular myocardial performance index (LV or RV MPI) were measured at before and after the administration dexmedetomidine or saline.The Dex group showed significant decrease of heart rate (P = 0.038), and increase of mean blood pressure (P < 0.001), LV E/e′ (P = 0.025), and LV MPI (P < 0.001) compared to those of the Control group on a linear mixed model analysis. Also, the Dex group showed significant increase of RV E/e′ (P < 0.001) and RV MPI (P = 0.028) compared to those of the Control group.Intraoperative dexmedetomidine administration during general anesthesia was appeared to deteriorate biventricular function in patients with diastolic dysfunction. We suggest careful consideration and a need for reducing dosage when administrating dexmedetomidine in patients with diastolic dysfunction.     

Effect of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Infusion on Postoperative Bowel Movements in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Prospective,Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

Sympathetic hyperactivation is one of the causes of postoperative ileus, which occurs frequently after abdominal surgery and adversely influences the patient''s prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether dexmedetomidine (DEX) could attenuate postoperative ileus in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy.Ninety-two patients were randomized to the control (n = 46) or DEX group (n = 46). DEX was administered at a loading dose of 0.5 μg/kg for 10 minutes, followed by an infusion rate of 0.4 μg/kg/h from insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum to the end of surgery. The primary goal was to compare postoperative bowel movements by evaluating the time to first flatus. The balance of the autonomic nervous system, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and pain scores were assessed.The time to first flatus was shorter in the DEX group compared with the control group (67.2 ± 16.8 hours vs 79.9 ± 15.9 hours, P < 0.001). The low-frequency/high-frequency power ratio during pneumoperitoneum increased in the control group, compared with baseline values and the DEX group. The length of postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the DEX group compared with the control group (5.4 ± 0.7 days vs 5.8 ± 1.1 days, P = 0.04). Patients in the DEX group had lower pain scores and required fewer analgesics at 1 hour postoperatively.DEX facilitated bowel movements and reduced the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy. This may be attributed to the sympatholytic and opioid-sparing effects of DEX.     

Observation of the analgesic effect of superficial or deep anterior serratus plane block on patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy

The effectiveness of anterior serratus plane block in postoperative analgesia of thoracic surgery is beginning to emerge. Currently, there are 2 methods of anterior serratus plane block: deep serratus plane block (DSPB) and superficial serratus plane block (SSPB). In clinical practice, there is no an unified view regarding the advantages and disadvantages between 2 methods. This study aimed to observe and compare the analgesic effects of 2 methods on patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy, in order to provide some suggestions for anesthesiologists when they choose anterior serratus plane block to perform postoperative analgesia for patients.Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups (21 patients/group):

• 1.general anesthesia group (P group);
• 2.combined general anesthesia and SSPB group (S group), and
• 3.combined general anesthesia and DSPB group (D group).

The patients in groups S and D received 0.4 ml/kg of 0.375% ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided block after surgery. Postoperatively, flurbiprofen was used for rescue analgesia.Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded at 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after surgery, and rescue analgesia, post-operative nausea, and vomiting were reported within 24 hours after surgery. At 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours, the VAS scores and the rescue analgesia rates in groups S and D were significantly lower than those in group P (all P < .001). With prolonging time, the VAS in group D was significantly increased by 0.11 per hour as compared with that of group P (P < .0001); VAS in group D was significantly increased by 0.12 per hour as compared with that of group S (P < .0001).Ultrasound-guided anterior serratus plane block can provide adequate analgesia for patients undergoing thoracoscopy lobectomy. SSPB can significantly improve VAS scores as compared to DSPB at 24 hours.     

CONSORT the effect of a bolus dose of dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain,agitation, and quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background:The perioperative administration of dexmedetomidine may improve the quality of recovery (QoR) after major abdominal and spinal surgeries. We evaluated the effect of an intraoperative bolus of dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain, emergence agitation, and the QoR after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods:Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg 5 minutes after anesthesia induction (dexmedetomidine group, n = 45) or normal saline (control group, n = 45). The primary outcome was the QoR at the first postoperative day using a 40-item scoring system (QoR-40). Secondary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, postoperative agitation, pain, and nausea and vomiting.Results:The heart rate and the mean blood pressure were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group (P < .001 and .007, respectively). During extubation, emergence agitation was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group (23% vs 64%, P < .001). The median pain scores in the post-anesthetic care unit were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group (4 [2–7] vs 5 [4–7], P = .034). The incidence of postoperative agitation, pain, and nausea and vomiting was not different between the groups. On the first postoperative day, recovery profile was similar between the groups. However, the scores on the emotional state and physical comfort dimensions were significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group (P = .038 and .040, respectively).Conclusions:A bolus dose of dexmedetomidine after anesthesia induction may improve intraoperative hemodynamics, emergence agitation, and immediate postoperative analgesia. However, it does not affect overall QoR-40 score after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

The 95% effective dose of nalbuphine in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy compared to equivalent sufentanil: Retraction

Purpose:To evaluate the 95% effective dose of nalbuphine in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) by the sequential method and compare the analgesia efficacy with the equivalent dose of sufentanil on patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy.Methods:In the first part, we defined a successful analgesia as the highest VAS ≤3 in 24 hours postoperatively. On the contrary, a failed analgesia was the highest VAS>3. According to the last patient''s outcome, the next patients would be given an increase or decreased dose grade. This process ended up with 9 cross-over points. In the second part, 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy were selected. They were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 30 each group): receiving sufentanil 1.78 μg/kg (group S) and nalbuphine 1.78 mg/kg (group N). PCIA pump was given at the end of the operation with 5 mL bonus loading. The total amount of PCIA was 100 mL and programmed to deliver 0.5 mL each time with a lockout interval of 15 minutes and the background infusion amount of 2 mL/h. The VAS score and Ramsay score of were collected after the operation, the number of effective pressing times of PCIA were also recorded. Adverse reactions were documented in detail.Results:The 95% effective dose of nalbuphine in PCIA on patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy was 1.78 mg/kg. There was no significant difference in VAS between the sufentanil group and the nalbuphine groups (P > .05), but the number of the use of PCIA in the group S was more than that in the group N obviously (P <.05). The group S has a lower ramsay sedation score than group N at every time point. (P <.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting was not statistically significant differences between two groups in the first 24 hours after colonoscopy (P >  q .05).Conclusion:Nalbuphine 1.78 mg/kg in PCIA is recommended for the patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy. And nalbuphine is a reasonable alternative to sufentanil when used in PCIA.     

Comparison Between the Use of Ropivacaine Alone and Ropivacaine With Sufentanil in Epidural Labor Analgesia

To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of the sole local anesthetic ropivacaine with the combination of both local anesthetic ropivacaine and opioidergic analgesic sufentanil given epidurally on the labor pain control.After institutional review board approval and patient consent, a total of 500 nulliparas requesting epidural labor analgesia were enrolled and 481 eventually were randomized into 2 groups: a sole local anesthetic group (ropivacaine 0.125%) and a combination of local anesthetic and opioidergic analgesic group (0.125% ropivacaine + 0.3 μg/mL sufentanil). After the test dose, a 10-mL epidural analgesic solution was given in a single bolus, followed by intermittent bolus injection of 10 to 15 mL of the solution. The primary outcome was the analgesic efficacy measured using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain. Other maternal and infant variables were evaluated as secondary outcomes.A total of 346 participants completed the study. The median NRS pain score during the 1st stage of labor was significantly lower in the combination group 2.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.8–2.7) comparing to the sole local analgesic group 2.4 (IQR: 2.0–2.8) (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in NRS pain score prior epidural analgesia and during the 2nd stage of labor. Patients in both groups rated same satisfaction of analgesia. Patients in the sole local analgesic group experienced fewer side effects than those in the combination group (37.7% vs 47.2%, P = 0.082). The individual analgesia-related cost in the sole local analgesic group was less ($5.7 ± 2.06) than that in the combination group ($9.76 ± 3.54) (P < 0.0001). The incidence of 1-minute Apgar ≤ 7 was lower in the sole local analgesic group 2 (1.2%) than the combination group 10 (5.5%) (P = 0.038). No difference was found between other secondary outcomes.The sole local anesthetic ropivacaine produces a comparable labor analgesic effect as the combination of both local anesthetic ropivacaine and opioidergic analgesic sufentanil at different stages of labor (Δ_NRS = 0.2) but the former has less side effects, lower cost, and less incidence of lower 1-minute Apgar scoring. These results imply the necessity of a systematic reevaluation of epidural labor analgesia with sole local anesthetics against combination regimens of local anesthetics and other opioids.     

Postoperative Pain and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia-Related Adverse Effects in Young and Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of 10,575 Patients

In this retrospective analysis of 10,575 patients who used fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) after surgery, we evaluated difference between young and elderly patients on their characteristic of adverse effects.We reviewed the data collected from the patients who were provided IV-PCA for pain control following elective surgery under either general or spinal anesthesia between September 2010 and March 2014. Postoperative pain, incidence of PCA-related adverse effects, and risk factors for the need of rescue analgesics and antiemetics for postoperative 48 hours were analyzed.Pain intensity (numerical rating scale [NRS]) at postoperative 6 to 12 hours (4.68 vs 4.58, P < 0.01) and incidence of nausea or vomiting (23.8% vs 20.6%, P < 0.001) were higher in young patients, while incidence of PCA discontinuation (9.9% vs 11.5%, P < 0.01) and sedation (0.1% vs 0.7%, P < 0.001) was higher in elderly patients. Despite larger fentanyl dose used, a greater proportion of young patients required rescue analgesics (53.8% vs 47.9%, P < 0.001) while addition of ketorolac was effective in reducing postoperative pain. Despite lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), a larger proportion of elderly patients required rescue antiemetics (10.1% vs 12.2%, P < 0.001) while addition of ramosetron was effective in reducing PONV.In conclusion, when fentanyl-based IV-PCA is used for postoperative pain control, a larger proportion of young patients may require rescue analgesics while elderly patients may require more rescue antiemetics. The addition of ketorolac or ramosetron to the PCA of young and elderly patients can be effective to prevent rescue analgesics or antiemetics use.     

Hydromorphone vs sufentanil in patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: A meta-analysis

Background:Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is an effective method of postoperative pain, there have been many studies performed that have compared the efficacy of hydromorphone with continuous sufentanil. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the efficacy and safety of hydromorphone and sufentanil.Methods:Seven databases were searched for controlled trials to compare the efficacy and safety of hydromorphone and sufentanil. After selecting the studies, extracting the data, and assessing study quality, the meta-analysis was performed on several of the studies with RevMan 5.3.Results:Thirteen studies comprised of 812 patients were found. The pain intensity of the hydromorphone group was significantly lower than that of the sufentanil group at 12 hours. With no statistical difference at 24 to 48 hours (MD₁₂ = −1.52, 95% CI [−2.13, −1.97], P <.05). The sedation intensity of the hydromorphone group at 12, 24, and 48 hours were lower than those of the sufentanil group, with no statistical difference (MD₁₂ = −0.03, 95% CI [−0.18, 0.12], P > .05; MD₂₄ = −0.20, 95% CI [−0.42, 0.03], P > .05; MD₄₈ = −0.03, 95% CI [−0.18, 0.11)], P > .05). The PCA requests in the hydromorphone group were less than that in the sufentanil group, and there was no significant difference (RR = −0.20, 95% CI [−1.93,1.53], P > .05). The incidence of adverse events in the hydromorphone group was less than that in the sufentanil group, and there was a statistical difference: (RR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.47,0.79], P < .05).Conclusion:Compared with sufentanil, PCA with hydromorphone was more effective in relieving pain and PCA requests 12, 24, and 48 hours after operation, and significantly reduced the incidence of adverse events, but it did not have an advantage in sedation intensity.     

Serum NSE and S100B protein levels for evaluating the impaired consciousness in patients with acute carbon monoxide poisoning

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between the levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100B protein and coma duration, and evaluate the optimal cut-off values for prediction coma duration ≥ 72 hours in patients with acute carbon monoxide poisoning (ACOP).A total of 60 patients with ACOP were divided into 3 following groups according to their status of consciousness and coma duration at admission: Awake group [Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS score) ≥ 13 points], Coma < 72 hours group (GCS score < 13 points and coma duration < 72 h), and Coma ≥ 72 hours group (GCS score < 13 points and coma duration ≥ 72 h). The levels of serum NSE and S100B protein were measured after admission.There were significant differences in GCS score, carbon monoxide (CO) exposure time, NSE, and S100B levels between the Coma ≥ 72 h group and the Awake group, and between the Coma < 72 h group and the Awake group. Significant differences in GCS score, NSE, and S100B levels were also found between Coma ≥ 72 h group and Coma < 72 h group. Correlation analysis showed that NSE and S100B were positively correlated (r_s = 0.590, P < .01); NSE and S100B were negatively correlated with GCS score (r_s = -0.583, r_s = -0.590, respectively, both P < .01). The areas under the curve (AUCs) of NSE, S100B, and GCS score to predict the coma duration ≥ 72 hours were 0.754, 0.791, and 0.785, respectively. Pairwise comparisons did not show differences among the 3 groups (all P > .05). The sensitivity and specificity of NSE prediction with a cut-off value of 13 μg/L were 80% and 64%, respectively, and those of S100B prediction with a cut-off value of 0.43 μg/L were 70% and 88%, respectively.The NSE and S100B protein levels were significantly correlated with the degree of impaired consciousness and had the same clinical value in predicting coma duration of ≥ 72 hours in patients with ACOP.     

Effect of ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair

Objective:To observe the effect of Ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative sedation in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.Methods:100 male patients aged 60 to 80 years old, a line to elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, were randomly divided into four groups: control group (Group A) and dezocine group (Group B), ketorolac tromethamine group (Group C), ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine group (Group D). Patients were administrated with 0.1 mg/kg dezocine in Group B, 0.5 mg/kg ketorolac in Group C, 0.1 mg/kg dezocine, and 0.5 mg/kg ketorolac in Group D, and with an equal dose of normal saline in group A. The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) of patients in 4 groups were recorded at each time point as follows, T0 (enter the operating room), T1 (before skin resection), 10 min after pneumoperitoneum (T2), mesh placement (T3), and laryngeal mask extraction (T4). Operation time, awakening time (time from drug withdrawal to consciousness recovery), the dosage of propofol, sufentanil, remifentanil, and intraoperative vasoactive drug dosage were recorded to compare. Visual analog scale score and sedation Ramsay score were evaluated 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after extubation.Results:There was no significant difference in operation time, anesthesia recovery time, sufentanil dosage, and vasoactive drugs among all groups. The amount of propofol in Group B and D was less than that in Group A and C (P < .05), and there was no difference between Group B and D, A and C (P > .05). The amount of remifentanil in Group B, C, and D was less than that in Group A (P < .05), and Group D was less than B and C (P < .05). After extubation, HR and MAP were significantly higher than before (P < .05). Compared with T0, HR and MAP increased in each group at T4, but MAP and HR in Group D increased the least (P < .05). There were significant differences between Group B, C, D, and A, MAP and HR fluctuated little during extubation (P < .05), but there was a significant difference between Group D and B, C (P < .05). Visual analog scale scores of Group B, C, and D were lower than those of A at 1, 6, and 12 hours after surgery (P < .05), and there was a significant difference between Group D, and B, C (P < .05). Ramsay scores in Group B and D were higher than those in A and C at 1 and 6 hours after the operation (P < .05). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among groups.Conclusion:The prophylactic use of ketorolac tromethamine and dezocine before laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can reduce hemodynamic disorder during anesthesia recovery, increase postoperative sedative and analgesic effects.     

Comparison of epidural,spinal, and saddle block for holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP): A prospective randomized,comparative study

Background:Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has become an important treatment modality for benign prostate hypertrophy. The aim of the present study was to compare regional anesthesia methods for HoLEP operation and to determine the optimal technique.Methods:Sixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of I-III were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Patients in group E received an epidural block with 75 mg of bupivacaine plus 50 μg of fentanyl. In group S, 15 mg of bupivacaine and 50 μg fentanyl were used for spinal anesthesia. In group SA, patients received saddle block with 15 mg of bupivacaine and 50 μg of fentanyl.Results:Time to T10 dermatome block and to maximal level block were longest in group E (P < .05), and maximal sensorial block level was higher in group E than group SA (P < .05). There was a significant difference in postoperative motor block, but no difference in systolic blood pressure and heart rate.Conclusion:Among 3 techniques, saddle block might be preferable in HoLEP because an adequate sensorial level was achieved with lower motor block and stable hemodynamics.     

Comparison of opioid local anesthetic combination regimens using the number of self-administrated boluses in patient-controlled epidural analgesia after cesarean section: A retrospective single-center study

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of combined opioids by comparing four regimens of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) after cesarean section.Parturient patients who underwent elective or emergent cesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia from April 2013 to March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on PCEA, they were assigned to one of 4 groups: local anesthetic alone (LA), epidural single morphine administration during surgery followed by local anesthetic alone (M), local anesthetic combined with fentanyl 10 μg/h (F10), or local anesthetic combined with fentanyl 20 μg/h (F20). The primary outcome was the number of PCEA boluses used. Secondary outcomes included the use of rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative pruritus.A total of 250 parturients were analyzed. Whereas the number of PCEA boluses in the LA group was significantly higher than in the other combined opioid groups on the day of surgery and postoperative day 1 (LA: 3 [1–6] and 7 [4–9] vs M: 2 [0–4] and 4 [0–7] vs F10: 1 [0–4] and 3 [0–6] vs F20: 1 [0–3] and 2 [0–8], P = .012 and 0.010, respectively), within the combined opioid groups, the number was not significantly different. Significantly fewer patients in the F20 group required rescue analgesia on postoperative day 1 and 2 (25 and 55%) than those in the M (66 and 81%) and F10 (62 and 66%) groups (P < .001 and P = .007, respectively). Postoperative nausea and vomiting and pruritus were significantly higher in the M group (P < .008 and P = .024, respectively).The results of the present study suggest that local anesthetic alone after a single administration of morphine, or local anesthetic combined with fentanyl 10 μg/h would generally be adequate for PCEA, whereas local anesthetic combined with fentanyl 20 μg/h would be suitable for conventional epidural analgesia.     

The effects of core stability training in nurses with nonspecific low back pain

To investigate the effect of core stability training on nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) in nurses.The data were collected retrospectively by reviewing the patient''s medical records and pain questionnaires in our rehabilitation center. A total of 40 nurses with NSLBP were included and divided into observation group and control group. Each group were given routine health education for NSLBP. Core stability training was performed in observation group for 4 weeks. Surface electromyography (sEMG) evaluation of erector spine and multifidus muscle, pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were evaluated and analyzed before and 4 weeks after intervention.There was no significant difference of NRS score and JOA score between two groups before intervention (P > .05, respectively). The NRS and JOA scores were significantly improved in both two groups after 4 weeks of intervention (P < .05, respectively). Moreover, the improvement of NRS and JOA scores in the observation group were better than those of the control group (P < .05, respectively). No significant difference of average electromyography (AEMG) or median frequency (MF) were noted between the healthy side and the affected side in both groups before or after intervention (P > .05, respectively). After 4 weeks of intervention, the AEMG of the healthy and the affected side of the two groups showed an improved trend without significant difference (P > .05, respectively). The MF of affected side was significantly higher 4 weeks after intervention than those before treatment in the observation and control group (P < .05, respectively).Core stability training can alleviate pain, improve the fatigue resistance of the core muscles and the balance of the functions of bilateral multifidus muscles in nurses with NSLBP.     

Postoperative recovery of patients with differential requirements for sevoflurane after abdominal surgery: A prospective observational clinical study

An association between animals and volatile anaesthetic requirements has been shown; however, evidence related to the postoperative outcome of human patients is lacking. Our aim was to investigate whether there is a difference in the requirement for sevoflurane among people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.We observed 390 adult patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I or II with an expected surgery duration of > 2 hours. We used the bispectral index (BIS) to guide the regulation of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (ETsevo). The mean ETsevo from 20 minutes after endotracheal intubation to 2 hours after the start of surgery was calculated for all patients. Differential sevoflurane requirements were identified according to ETsevo. The BIS, ETsevo, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, dose of sufentanil and cisatracurium, tracheal extubation time, incidence of intraoperative awareness, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were compared between patients with a low requirement for sevoflurane (group L) and patients with a high requirement for sevoflurane (group H).The mean ETsevo of the 390 patients was 1.55% ± 0.26%. Based on our definition, patients with an ETsevo of < 1.29% were allocated to the low requirement group (group L; n = 69), while patients with an ETsevo of > 1.81% were allocated to the high requirement group (group H; n = 78). The ETsevo of group L was significantly lower than the ETsevo of group H (1.29% ± 0.014% vs 1.82% ± 0.017%, P < .001). There was no significant difference in the ETsevo, BIS, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, dose of sufentanil and cisatracurium, tracheal extubation time, incidence of intraoperative awareness, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The tracheal extubation time in the L group was significantly shorter than that in the H group. No intraoperative awareness occurred.There was a significant difference in the requirement for sevoflurane in adult patients. The tracheal extubation time in group L was significantly shorter than that in group H.     

Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Promotes Postoperative Analgesia in Patients After Abdominal Colectomy: A Consort-Prospective,Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Surgery-induced acute postoperative pain may lead to prolonged convalescence. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia following abdominal colectomy surgeries. Eighty patients scheduled for abdominal colectomy surgery under general anesthesia were divided into 2 groups, which were maintained using propofol/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine (PRD) or propofol/remifentanil/saline (PRS). During surgery, patients in the PRD group had a lower bispectral index (BIS) value, which indicated a deeper anesthetic state, and a higher sedation score right after extubation than patients in the PRS group. During the first 24 hours post surgery, PRD patients consumed less morphine in patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and had a lower score in the visual analog scale (VAS) testing than their controls from the PRS group. Intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine appears to promote the analgesic property of morphine-based PCA in patients after abdominal colectomy.     

Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes and Prognoses in Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma,by Transthoracic and Transabdominal Hiatal Approaches: A Teaching Hospital Retrospective Cohort Study

To compare the clinical outcomes and prognoses in patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (Siewert type II/III), by transthoracic and transabdominal hiatal approaches.Siewert II/III gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas patients (334 cases) underwent different surgical procedures at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from July 2007 to July 2012 and were analyzed retrospectively. In total, 140 patients underwent surgery by the transthoracic approach, and 194 patients underwent the transabdominal hiatal approach mainly with radical total and proximal gastrectomy (D2). All patients were followed up by telephone review or by outpatient reexamination until July 2013. The surgically related and clinical outcomes were compared using the χ² test, t test, Fisher exact test, or nonparametric rank sum test according to different data. The survival curve was drawn by the Kaplan–Meier method and survival analysis used Cox regression analysis.The operative time, length of resected esophagus, number of lymph nodes harvested, postoperative pain scores, postoperative hospital stay, time of antibiotics use, postoperative morbidity, and costs for the transabdominal surgery group were better than that of the transthoracic group. The overall 5-year survival rate was 35.3% and 40.3%, respectively, in the transthoracic and transabdominal surgery groups, and differences were not statistically significant (x² = 2.311, P > 0.05). The hazard ratio of death for the transthoracic compared with the transabdominal approach was 1.27 (0.93–1.72, P > 0.05). According to tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging, stratification analysis showed that stage III patient overall survival rates were 25.7% and 37.2%, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (x² = 4.127, P < 0.05). In uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio for the transabdominal versus the transthoracic approach was 0.66 (0 43 to 0.99, P < 0.05) and 1.47 (1.05–2.06, P < 0.05), respectively.There were no significant differences of 5-year overall survival in TNM stage I and II of the Siewert II/III adenocarcinoma patients, but improved survival of TNM stage III patients undergoing transabdominal hiatal compared with transthoracic total radical and proximal gastrectomy. The short-term clinical outcomes improved with the transabdominal hiatial surgery group.     

Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel,fractional ablative laser,or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars

Objective:To compare and analyze the effects of Er:YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peeling, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars.Method:Ninety patients of concavity acne scar were randomly assigned to three different groups:microlaserpeeling mode group (MM group), fractional ablative mode group (FM group) and combined mode group (CM group). MM group received microlaserpeeling mode with depth of 60 μm and a repetition rate of 20%, FM group received fractional ablative mode with depth of 300 μm and a fractional density of 8%, and CM group received a fractional depth of 200 μm, density of 8%, and a peeling depth of 30 μm, repetition rate of 20%. All patients were evaluated for their treatment effects and side effects 30 days after treatment, including the treatment satisfaction, the ECCA grading scale, pain score and pigmentation level.Results:According to the effect satisfaction of patients’ self-assessment, the difference among the three groups was statistically significant (P < .05), the CM group was better than the other two groups, but there was no significant difference between the FM group and the MM group (P > .05). About the ECCA grading scale 30 days after treatment, the statistical result among the three groups was significant (P < .05), the CM group is much lower than the FM group which is approximately equal to the MM group. There was statistical difference in pain score among the three groups and every two groups (P < .05), the CM group had the highest pain score, while FM group had the lowest. About the pigmentation level, there was statistical difference among the three groups (P < .05), FM group had the lightest pigmentation, while the CM group had the heaviest.Conclusions:Three treatment modes are all effective in treating the concavity acne scar. Among the three modes, CM group is best effective, also accompanied with the most severe side effect; FM group achieves the best balance between treatment effect and side effect. The treatment practices indicate that when the Er:YAG laser with a wavelength of 2940 nm is used to treat concavity acne scars, the right treatment mode should be subject to the severity of the scar.     

Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Myopic,Emmetropic, and Hyperopic Children

The purpose of this study was to investigate the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic children using optical coherence tomography.Two-hundred one right eyes of subjects aged 4 to 18 years were divided into 3 groups based on their postcycloplegic spherical equivalent: myopes (<−1.0 D), emmetropes (≥−1.0 to ≤+1.0 D), and hyperopes (>+1.0 D). The RNFL was correlated with age, spherical equivalent, and axial length. The RNFL was compared between the 3 groups before and after age adjustment.The RNFL was thickest in the hyperopic group (107.2 ± 10.13 μm, n = 73), followed by the emmetropic group (102.5 ± 9.2 μm, n = 61), and then the myopic group (95.7 ± 10.3, n = 67) (all P < 0.0001). The myopic group (9.6 ± 3.9 years) was significantly older than the emmetropic (6.9 ± 2.7 years) and hyperopic (6.5 ± 1.9 years) groups (both P < 0.0001). When adjusted for age, myopes had a thinner RNFL than the other 2 groups (all P < 0.0001), but there was no RNFL thickness difference between the emmetropic and hyperopic groups (P > 0.05). A thinner RNFL was associated with an older age (r = −0.4, P < 0.0001), a more myopic spherical equivalent (r = 0.5, P < 0.0001), and a longer axial length (r = −0.4, P < 0.0001) on Pearson correlation analysis.The apparently thicker RNFL in hyperopic and emmetropic children was attributed to their younger age as compared with their myopic counterparts. When adjusted for age, only myopia was associated with a thinner RNFL, with emmetropic and hyperopic children having equal RNFL thicknesses. Advancing age, a more myopic spherical equivalent, and a longer axial length were associated with a thinner RNFL in children.     

Dexmedetomidine dosage in critically ill patients undergoing intraoperative wake-up test: A randomized controlled trial

Objective:The aim of this study was to find the optimum dosage of dexmedetomidine in Spinal Orthopedic Scoliosis Correction Surgery when used in combination with propofol and remifentanil in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III patients with severe scoliosis undergoing intraoperative wake-up test.Materials and methods:We selected a total of 60 ASA III ≤40 years old patients who underwent Spinal Orthopedic Scoliosis Correction Surgery (SOSCS) and randomized them into groups A, B, and C. Group A was administered 0.2 μg/(kg·h) of dexmedetomidine, group B 0.3 μg/(kg·h), and group C 0.4 μg/(kg·h). The main parameters monitored were: wake-up time; wake-up quality; adverse effects that occur while the patient is awake; postoperative awareness of intraoperative wake-up test; heart rate (HR); mean arterial pressure (MAP); and oxygen saturation (SpO₂). Values of these parameters were monitored at 7 timestamps separated by 5 minutes >30 minutes.Results:Group B had a higher MAP at 10 minutes before wake-up (P = .03) and at the moment of wake-up (P = .04) than group A. The Wake-up time of group A was 14.95 ± 7.42 minutes, group B was 14.7 ± 6.52 minutes, which was significantly shorter than that of group C 21.3 ± 10.02 minutes (P = .02). The wake-up quality was excellent. All other parameters had no significant statistical differences.Conclusion:Doses of 0.2 to 0.3 μg/(kg·h) have shorter wake-up time and fewer hemodynamic fluctuations compared to 0.4 μg/(kg·h).