共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
Andrew M. Hayden Ann M. Hayes Jennifer L. Brechbuhler Heidi Israel Howard M. Place 《The spine journal》2018,18(1):173-178
Background Context
To date, many studies have examined how pelvic position affects the spinal curvature and spinopelvic parameters. However, these studies focus on a static relationship, comparing pelvis and spine in a relaxed or baseline position only. Indeed, the spinopelvic connection is dynamic, as subjects can easily be taught to rotate their pelvis anteriorly or posteriorly on the femoral head, all while maintaining an erect posture. Therefore, for a true understanding of pelvic influence on the spinal column, it is necessary to examine spinopelvic parameters in multiple pelvic positions within the same subject.Purpose
The objective of this study was to examine the dynamic effect of pelvic motion on the spine and associated radiographic parameters.Study Design
This is a single-center, cross-sectional study of 50 healthy, asymptomatic volunteers.Patient Sample
Subjects were recruited and screened based on the following criteria: between 18 and 79 years of age; no known spinal, pelvic, or lower extremity pain lasting for >48 hours; no history of spinal, pelvic, or lower extremity dysfunction requiring medical care; no radiographic evidence of spinal or pelvic abnormality, scoliosis deformity, or other associated spinal pathologies; not currently pregnant and with no possibility of being pregnant; and a body mass index of <30. 64. The subjects were screened and 14 were excluded for a total of 50 subjects.Outcome Measures
The outcome measures included thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic incidence (PI).Materials and Methods
This study was funded by a Small Exploratory Research Grant from the Scoliosis Research Society. Each subject was instructed and observed to stand in three different positions: pelvic resting, anterior pelvic rotation, and posterior pelvic rotation. Lateral standing radiographs were taken in each position and each image was examined by an orthopedic spine surgeon who digitally measured the TK, LL, SVA, PT, SS, and PI. The data were then statistically examined to determine the affect of pelvic position on each parameter.Results
Subjects demonstrated a measurable, statistically significant change in each parameter with pelvic rotation. There was a clear pattern of change for LL, PT, and SS with the anterior and posterior pelvic rotations. A change in LL demonstrated a strong correlation with changes in all measured parameters with pelvic rotation.Conclusions
In asymptomatic subjects, pelvic motion affects the position of the spinal column and resultant spinopelvic parameters. The results of this study demonstrate that one can intentionally change the position of the pelvis and the adjacent spinal column in space. Knowledge of this relationship is important to the understanding of sagittal balance and could influence the treatment of patients with spinal deformity. 相似文献2.
Hwee Weng Dennis Hey Gordon Chengyuan Wong Chloe Xiaoyun Chan Leok-Lim Lau Naresh Kumar Joseph Shantakumar Thambiah John Nathaniel Ruiz Ka-Po Gabriel Liu Hee-Kit Wong 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):830-836
Background Context
Knowledge of sagittal radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients has not yet caught up with our understanding of their roles in patients with adult spinal deformity. It is likely that more emphasis will be placed in restoring sagittal parameters for AIS patients in the future. Therefore, we need to understand how these parameters may vary in AIS to facilitate management plans.Purpose
This study aimed to determine the reproducibility of sagittal spinal parameters on lateral film radiographs in patients with AIS.Study Design/Setting
This was a retrospective, comparative study conducted in a tertiary health-care institution from January 2013 to February 2016 (3-year period).Patient Sample
All AIS patients who underwent deformity correction surgery from January 2013 to February 2016 and had two preoperative serial lateral radiographs taken within the time period of a month were included in the study.Outcome Measures
Radiographic sagittal spinal parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar alignment (TL), lumbar lordosis (LL); standard spinopelvic measurements such as pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS); as well as end and apical vertebrae of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar curves were the outcome measures.Methods
All patient data were pooled from electronic medical records, and X-ray images were retrieved from Centricity Enterprise Web. Averaged X-ray measurements by two independent assessors were analyzed by comparing two radiographs of the same patients performed within a 1-month time period. Chi-squared and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for categorical and continuous variables.Results
The study cohort comprised 138 patients, 28 men and 110 women, with a mean age of 15 years (range 11–20). Between the two lateral X-rays, there was a mean difference of 0.79?cm in SVA (p<.001), 0.70° in LL (p=.033), and 0.73° in PT (p=.010). In the combined Lenke 1 and 2 subgroup, there was a similar 0.77?cm (p=.002), 0.79° (p=.009), and 1.49° (p=.001) mean difference in SVA, LL, and PT, respectively. Additionally, there was also a 1.85° (p=.009) and 1.76° (p=.006) mean difference seen in TL and SS, respectively. The overall profile of the sagittal curves remained largely similar, with only the lumbar apex shifting from L3 to L4 during the first and the second X-rays, respectively (p<.001). This occurred for the combined Lenke 1 and 2 subgroup as well (p<.001).Conclusion
Most radiographic sagittal spinal parameters in AIS patients are generally reproducible with some variations up to a maximum of 4°. This natural variation should be taken into account when interpreting these radiographic sagittal parameters so as to achieve the most accurate results in surgical planning. 相似文献3.
Zhiwei Yang Fang Xie Jianxin Zhang Zhuowen Liang Zhe Wang Xueyu Hu Zhuojing Luo 《The spine journal》2017,17(12):1812-1818
Background Context
The lumbar spine latericumbent and full-length lateral standing radiographs are most commonly used to assess lumbar disorder. However, there are few literatures on the difference and correlation of the sagittal parameters between the two shooting positions.Purpose
The study aimed to investigate the difference of sagittal parameters in spine lateral radiographs between latericumbent and upright positions, identify the correlation, and establish a preliminary linear fitting formula.Study Design
The study is a prospective study on radiographic evaluation of sagittal alignment using latericumbent and upright positions.Patient Sample
One hundred fifty-seven patients were recruited from the orthopedics clinic of a single medical center.Outcome Measure
Angle measurement, the intra- and interobserver measurement reliability of measurement, and analysis of the angle measurement were carried out.Method
The sagittal alignment of 157 patients were assessed using Surgimap software from two kinds of lateral radiographs to acquire the following parameters: lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), L4–L5 intervertebral angle (IVA4–5), L4–L5 intervertebral height index (IHI4–5), and PI–LL. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired t test, Pearson correlation analysis, and multivariate linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data.Results
The results showed significantly statistical difference in LL, SS, PT, IVA4–5, and PI–LL, except for PI and IHI4–5, between the two positions. There was a significant relativity between standing LL and latericumbent LL (r=0.733, p<.01), PI (r=0.611, p<.01), and SS (r=0.626, p<.01). The predictive formula of standing LL was 12.791+0.777 latericumbent LL+0.395 latericumbent PI?0.506 latericumbent SS (adjusted R2=0.619, p<.05).Conclusion
Not all of sagittal parameters obtained from two positions are identical. Thus, the full-spine lateral standing films are difficult to be replaced. The surgeon should give sufficient consideration to the difference between the two views. We may primarily predict standing LL with the formula when we could not get whole-spine lateral standing radiographs. 相似文献4.
Cyrus M. Jalai Bassel G. Diebo Dana L. Cruz Gregory W. Poorman Shaleen Vira Aaron J. Buckland Renaud Lafage Shay Bess Thomas J. Errico Virginie Lafage Peter G. Passias 《The spine journal》2017,17(5):681-688
Background Context
Obesity's impact on standing sagittal alignment remains poorly understood, especially with respect to the role of the lower limbs. Given energetic expenditure in standing, a complete understanding of compensation in obese patients with sagittal malalignment remains relevant.Purpose
This study compares obese and non-obese patients with progressive sagittal malalignment for differences in recruitment of pelvic and lower-limb mechanisms.Study Design/Setting
Single-center retrospective review.Patient Sample
A total of 554 patients (277 obese, 277 non-obese) were identified for analysis.Outcome Measures
Upper body alignment parameters: sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPi). Compensatory lower-limb mechanisms: pelvic translation (pelvic shift [PS]), knee (KA) and ankle (AA) flexion, hip extension (sacrofemoral angle [SFA]), and global sagittal angle (GSA).Methods
Inclusion criteria were patients ≥18 years who underwent full-body stereographic x-rays. Included patients were categorized as non-obese (N-Ob: body mass index [BMI]<30?kg/m2) or obese (Ob: BMI≥30?kg/m2). To control for potential confounders, groups were propensity score matched by age, gender, and baseline pelvic incidence (PI), and subsequently categorized by increasing spinopelvic (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI?LL]) mismatch: <10°, 10°–20°, >20°. Independent t tests and linear regression models compared sagittal (SVA, T1SPi) and lower limb (PS, KA, AA, SFA, GSA) parameters between obesity cohorts.Results
A total of 554 patients (277 Ob, 277 N-Ob) were included for analysis and were stratified to the following mismatch categories: <10°: n=367; 10°–20°: n=91; >20°: n=96. Obese patients had higher SVA, KA, PS, and GSA than N-Ob patients (p<.001 all). Low PI?LL mismatch Ob patients had greater SVA with lower SFA (142.22° vs. 156.66°, p=.032), higher KA (5.22° vs. 2.93°, p=.004), and higher PS (4.91 vs. ?5.20?mm, p<.001) than N-Ob patients. With moderate PI?LL mismatch, Ob patients similarly demonstrated greater SVA, KA, and PS, combined with significantly lower PT (23.69° vs. 27.14°, p=.012). Obese patients of highest (>20°) PI?LL mismatch showed greatest forward malalignment (SVA, T1SPi) with significantly greater PS, and a concomitantly high GSA (12.86° vs. 9.67°, p=.005). Regression analysis for lower-limb compensation revealed that increasing BMI and PI?LL predicted KA (r2=0.234) and GSA (r2=0.563).Conclusions
With progressive sagittal malalignment, obese patients differentially recruit lower extremity compensatory mechanisms, whereas non-obese patients preferentially recruit pelvic mechanisms. The ability to compensate for progressive sagittal malalignment with the pelvic retroversion is limited by obesity. 相似文献5.
Hwee Weng Dennis Hey Alex Quok An Teo Kimberly-Anne Tan Li Wen Nathaniel Ng Leok-Lim Lau Ka-Po Gabriel Liu Hee-Kit Wong 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):799-806
Background Context
The current prevailing school of thought in spinal deformity surgery is to restore sagittal balance with reference to the alignment of the spine when the patient is standing. This strategy, however, likely accounts for increased rates of proximal junctional failure.Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between the spine in standing and sitting positions as these may elucidate reasons for deformity correction failure.Study Design/Setting
A prospective, comparative study of 58 healthy patients presenting to a tertiary hospital over a 6-month period was carried out.Patient Sample
All patients presenting with a less than 3-month history of first episode lower back pain were included. Patients who had radicular symptoms, red flag symptoms, previous spine surgery, or visible spinal deformity during forward bending test were excluded. Pregnant patients were also excluded.Outcome Measures
Radiographic measurements including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar angle (TL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), cervical lordosis (CL), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT) were collected. The sagittal apex and end vertebrae of all radiographs were also recorded.Methods
Basic demographic data (age, gender, and ethnicity) was recorded. Lateral standing and sitting radiographs were obtained using EOS technology. Statistical analysis was performed to compare standing and sitting parameters using chi-square tests for categorical variables and paired t tests for continuous variables.Results
Taking the standing position as the reference point, forward displacement of the SVA occurred during sitting by a mean of 6.39±3.87?cm (p<.001). This was accompanied by a reduction of LL and TK by a mean of 24.63±12.70° (p<.001) and 8.56±7.21°(p<.001), respectively. The TL became more lordotic by a mean of 3.25±7.30° (p<.001). The CL only reached borderline significance (p=.047) for increased lordosis by a mean of 3.45±12.92°. The PT also increased by 50% (p<.001). Despite relatively constant end vertebrae, the apex vertebra moved inferiorly for the thoracic curve (p<.006) and superiorly for the lumbar curve (p<.001) by approximately one vertebral level each.Conclusions
Sagittal spinal alignment changes significantly between standing and sitting positions. Understanding these differences is crucial to avoid overcorrection of LL, which may occur if deformity correction is based solely on the spine's standing sagittal profile. 相似文献6.
Amer Sebaaly Rami El Rachkidi Pierre Grobost Marion Burnier Hubert Labelle Pierre Roussouly 《The spine journal》2018,18(8):1417-1423
Background
In high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGSPL), the pelvic incidence (PI) is not a reliable measurement because of doming of the sacrum. Measurement of L5 incidence (L5I) was described as a tool to measure pelvic morphology in HGSPL and for surgical follow-up.Objective
We aimed to evaluate L5I in HGSPL and its relationship to other spinopelvic parameters.Study Design
A retrospective study of a cohort of 184 patients with HGSPL was carried out.Methods
Whole spine radiographs were analyzed for PI, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, lumbar lordosis (LL), L5I, L5 tilt (L5T), L5 slope, lumbosacral kyphosis, and slip percentage. Statistical analysis and correlation were made (Pearson correlation test; p<.05). In accordance to Cohen, statically significant correlation were considered strong if R>0.5, moderate if 0.3<R<0.5, and small if R<0.3.Results
A total of 184 cases were analyzed, with a female-to-male ratio of 2.35 and a mean age of 20.1 years. Sacral doming was present in 73% of the cases. Mean L5I incidence was 65.2° and strongly correlated to other sagittal parameters, especially PT (R=0.7), LL (R=0.7), L5T (R=0.77), and L5 slope (R=0.83). There was less but still strong correlation to Dubousset lumbosacral kyphosis (Dub-LSK) angle (R=?0.63) and percentage of slippage (R=0.56). L5 tilt showed nearly perfect correlation to PT (R=0.95). Forty-four percent of the cases were balanced HGSPL, whereas 56% of the cases were unbalanced HGSPL. L5 incidence was found to be a good predictor of local imbalance with a cutoff of L5I=61.Conclusion
This paper describes L5I, which is a positional parameter in HGSPL. L5 incidence is a simple and reliable measure in the preoperative setting in HGSPL. Its correlation with spinal sagittal parameters (especially PT and LL) is strong and was found to be better than Dub-LSK. There is also a good correlation between L5I and HGSPL pelvic parameters (slip percentage and lumbosacral kyphosis). We recommend its use for evaluation of surgical correction and recommend the value of 60° as cutoff value to define spinopelvic balance in HGSPL. 相似文献7.
David N. Bernstein Etka Kurucan Emmanuel N. Menga Robert W. Molinari Paul T. Rubery Addisu Mesfin 《The spine journal》2018,18(10):1861-1866
Background Context
Numerous studies have analyzed the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on the cervical spine and its related surgical interventions. However, there is a paucity of literature available conducting the same analyses in patients with non-cervical spine involvement.Purpose
The objective of this study was to compare patient characteristics, comorbidities, and complications in patients with and without RA undergoing primary non-cervical spinal fusions.Study Design/Setting
This is a retrospective national database review.Patient Sample
A total of 52,818 patients with adult spinal deformity undergoing non-cervical spinal fusions (1,814 patients with RA and 51,004 patients without RA).Outcome Measures
The outcome measures in the study include patient characteristics, as well as complication and mortality rates.Materials and Methods
Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2003 to 2014, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify patients aged ≥18 years old with and without RA undergoing primary non-cervical spinal fusions. Univariate analysis was used to determine patient characteristics, comorbidities, and complication values for each group. Bivariate analysis was used to compare the two groups. Significance was set at p<.05.Results
Patients with RA were older (p<.001), were more likely to be women (p<.001), had increased rates of osteoporosis (p<.001), had a greater percentage of their surgeries reimbursed by Medicare (p<.001), and more often had weekend admissions (p=.014). There was no difference in all the other characteristics. Patients with RA had higher rates of iron deficiency anemia, congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, depression, and fluid and electrolyte disorders (all, p<.001). Patients without RA had higher rates of alcohol abuse (p=.027). There was no difference in all the other complications. There was no difference in mortality rate (p=.99). Total complications were greater in patients with RA (p<.001). Patients with RA had higher rates of infection (p=.032), implant-related complications (p=.010), incidental durotomies (p=.001), and urinary tract infections (p<.001). No difference existed among the other complications.Conclusions
Patients with RA have an increased number of comorbidities and complication rates compared with patients without RA. Such knowledge can help surgeons and patients with RA have beneficial preoperative discussions regarding outcomes. 相似文献8.
Deven A. Karvelas Sean D. Rundell Janna L. Friedly Alfred C. Gellhorn Laura S. Gold Bryan A. Comstock Patrick J. Heagerty Brian W. Bresnahan David R. Nerenz Jeffrey G. Jarvik 《The spine journal》2017,17(3):380-389
Background
The association between early physical therapy (PT) and subsequent health-care utilization following a new visit for low back pain is not clear, particularly in the setting of acute low back pain.Purpose
This study aimed to estimate the association between initiating early PT following a new visit for an episode of low back pain and subsequent back pain–specific health-care utilization in older adults.Design/Setting
This is a prospective cohort study. Data were collected at three integrated health-care systems in the United States through the Back Pain Outcomes using Longitudinal Data (BOLD) registry.Patient Sample
We recruited 4,723 adults, aged 65 and older, presenting to a primary care setting with a new episode of low back pain.Outcome Measures
Primary outcome was total back pain–specific relative value units (RVUs), from days 29 to 365. Secondary outcomes included overall RVUs for all health care and use of specific health-care services including imaging (x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or computed tomography [CT]), emergency department visits, physician visits, PT, spinal injections, spinal surgeries, and opioid use.Methods
We compared patients who had early PT (initiated within 28 days of the index visit) with those not initiating early PT using appropriate, generalized linear models to adjust for potential confounding variables.Results
Adjusted analysis found no statistically significant difference in total spine RVUs between the two groups (ratio of means 1.19, 95% CI of 0.72–1.96, p=.49). For secondary outcomes, only the difference between total spine imaging RVUs and total PT RVUs was statistically significant. The early PT group had greater PT RVUs; the ratio of means was 2.56 (95% CI of 2.17–3.03, p<.001). The early PT group had greater imaging RVUs; the ratio of means was 1.37 (95% CI of 1.09–1.71, p=.01.)Conclusions
We found that in a group of older adults presenting for a new episode of low back pain, the use of early PT is not associated with any statistically significant difference in subsequent back pain–specific health-care utilization compared with patients not receiving early PT. 相似文献9.
Hwee Weng Dennis Hey Chengyuan Gordon Wong Eugene Tze-Chun Lau Kimberly-Anne Tan Leok-Lim Lau Ka-Po Gabriel Liu Hee-Kit Wong 《The spine journal》2017,17(2):183-189
Background Context
Sitting spinal alignment is increasingly recognized as a factor influencing strategy for deformity correction. Considering that most individuals sit for longer hours in a “slumped” rather than in an erect posture, greater understanding of the natural sitting posture is warranted.Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the differences in sagittal spinal alignment between two common sitting postures: a natural, patient-preferred posture; and an erect, investigator-controlled posture that is commonly used in alignment studies.Design/Setting
This is a randomized, prospective study of 28 young, healthy patients seen in a tertiary hospital over a 6-month period.Patient Sample
Twenty-eight patients (24 men, 4 women), with a mean age of 24 years (range 19–38), were recruited for this study. All patients with first episode of lower back pain of less than 3 months' duration were included. The exclusion criteria consisted of previous spinal surgery, radicular symptoms, red flag symptoms, previous spinal trauma, obvious spinal deformity on forward bending test, significant personal or family history of malignancy, and current pregnancy.Outcome Measures
Radiographic measurements included sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar angle (TL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and cervical lordosis (CL). Standard spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt [PT], and sacral slope) and sagittal apex and end vertebrae were also measured.Methods
Basic patient demographics (age, gender, ethnicity) were recorded. Lateral sitting whole spine radiographs were obtained using a slot scanner in the imposed erect and the natural sitting posture. Statistical analyses of the radiographical parameters were performed comparing the two sitting postures using chi-squared tests for categorical variables and paired t tests for continuous variables.Results
There was forward SVA shift between the two sitting postures by a mean of 2.9?cm (p<.001). There was a significant increase in CL by a mean of 11.62° (p<.001), and TL kyphosis by a mean of 11.48° (p<.001), as well as a loss of LL by a mean of 21.26° (p<.001). The mean PT increased by 17.68° (p<.001). The entire thoracic and lumbar spine has the tendency to form a single C-shaped curve with the apex moving to L1 (p=.002) vertebra in the majority of patients.Conclusions
In a natural sitting posture, the lumbar spine becomes kyphotic and contributes to a single C-shaped sagittal profile comprising the thoracic and the lumbar spine. This is associated with an increase in CL and PT, as well as a constant SVA. These findings lend insight into the body's natural way of energy conservation using the posterior ligamentous tension band while achieving sitting spinal sagittal balance. It also provides information on one of the possible causes of proximal junctional kyphosis or proximal junctional failure. 相似文献10.
Aaron J. Buckland Subaraman Ramchandran Louis Day Shay Bess Themistocles Protopsaltis Peter G. Passias Bassel G. Diebo Renaud Lafage Virginie Lafage Akhila Sure Thomas J. Errico 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1601-1610
Background Context
Patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) adopt a forward flexed posture in an attempt to decompress neural elements. The relationship between sagittal alignment and severity of lumbar stenosis has not previously been studied.Purpose
We hypothesized that patients with increasing radiological severity of lumbar stenosis will exhibit worsening sagittal alignment.Study Design
This is a cross-sectional study.Patient Sample
Our sample consists of patients who have DLS.Outcome Measures
Standing pelvic, regional, lower extremity and global sagittal alignment, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were the outcome measures.Methods
Patients with DLS were identified from a retrospective clinical database with corresponding full-body stereoradiographs. Exclusion criteria included coronal malalignment, prior spine surgery, spondylolisthesis>Grade 1, non-degenerative spinal pathology, or skeletal immaturity. Central stenosis severity was graded on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from L1–S1. Foraminal stenosis and supine lordosis was graded on sagittal T1-weighted images. Standing pelvic, regional, lower extremity, and global sagittal alignment were measured using validated software. The HRQoL measures were also analyzed in relation to severity of stenosis.Results
A total of 125 patients were identified with DLS on appropriate imaging. As central stenosis grade increased, patients displayed significantly increasing standing T1 pelvic angle, pelvic tilt, sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (p<.05). No significant difference wasfound in pelvic incidence, supine lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, or T1 spinopelvic inclination between central stenosis groups. Despite similar supine lordosis between stenosis groups, patients with Grades 2 and 3 stenosis had less standing lordosis, suggesting antalgic posturing. Upper lumbar (L1–L3) stenosis predicted worse alignment than lower lumbar (L4–S1) stenosis.Increasing severity of foraminal stenosis was associated with reduced lumbar lordosis; however, no significant postural difference in lordosis, thoracolumbar, or lower extremity compensatory mechanisms were noted between foraminal stenosis groups. Stenosis grading did not predict worsening HRQoLs in central or foraminal stenosis.Conclusions
Severity of central lumbar stenosis as graded on MRI correlates with severity of sagittal malalignment. These findings support theories of sagittal malalignment as a compensatory mechanism for central lumbar stenosis. 相似文献11.
Jan Triebel Greta Snellman Bengt Sandén Fredrik Strömqvist Yohan Robinson 《The spine journal》2017,17(5):656-662
Background Context
Proper patient selection is of utmost importance in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Among other factors, gender was previously found to influence lumbar fusion surgery outcome.Purpose
This study investigates whether gender affects clinical outcome after lumbar fusion.Study Design
This is a national registry cohort study.Patient sample
Between 2001 and 2011, 2,251 men and 2,521 women were followed prospectively within the Swedish National Spine Register (SWESPINE) after lumbar fusion surgery for DDD and CLBP.Outcome measures
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), quality of life (QoL) parameter EQ5D, and labor status and pain medication were collected preoperatively, 1 and 2 years after surgery.Methods
Gender differences of baseline data and PROM improvement from baseline were analyzed. The effect of gender on clinically important improvement of PROM was determined in a multivariate logistic regression model. Furthermore, gender-related differences in return-to-work were investigated.Results
Preoperatively, women had worse leg pain (p<.001), back pain (p=.002), lower QoL (p<.001), and greater disability than men (p=.001). Postoperatively, women presented greater improvement 2 years from baseline for pain, function, and QoL (all p<.01). Women had better chances of a clinically important improvement than men for leg pain (odds ratio [OR]=1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19–1.61, p<.01) and back pain (OR=1.20,95% CI:1.03–1.40, p=.02) as well as ODI (OR=1.24, 95% CI:1.05–1.47, p=.01), but improved at a slower pace in leg pain (p<.001), back pain (p=.009), and disability (p=.008). No gender differences were found in QoL and return to work at 2 years postoperatively.Conclusions
Swedish women do not have worse results than men after spinal fusion surgery. Female patients present with worse pain and function preoperatively, but improve more than men do after surgery. 相似文献12.
Carol A. Mancuso Roland Duculan Frank P. Cammisa Andrew A. Sama Alexander P. Hughes Darren R. Lebl Federico P. Girardi 《The spine journal》2018,18(4):606-613
Background Context
Preoperative psychological symptoms predict surgical outcomes. The impact of surgical outcomes on psychological well-being, however, has not been delineated.Purpose
This study aimed to compare pre- with postoperative depressive and anxiety symptoms based on success of surgery, defined as fulfilled expectations and improvement in disability and pain.Study Design/Setting
A prospective 2-year longitudinal study in a tertiary care center was carried out.Patient Sample
The sample consisted of 276 patients who underwent lumbar surgery.Outcome Measures
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were the outcome measures.Methods
Patients completed the following validated surveys several days before and again 2 years after surgery: the GDS with a set threshold for a positive screen for depression; the STAI with population norms used as threshold values; the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); a numerical pain rating; and the Expectations Survey measuring amount of improvement expected. Dependent variables were pre- to postoperative within-patient change in GDS and STAI scores. Independent variables were three outcomes of surgery: proportion of expectations fulfilled, and changes in ODI scores and pain ratings. Analyses were conducted with GDS and STAI scores as continuous variables and according to threshold values, and for expectations, ODI and pain according to minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs).Results
Mean age was 55, 56% were men, and 78% had degenerative diagnoses. For depressive symptoms, 41% screened positive preoperatively and 16% screened positive postoperatively; 72% had some improvement. In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity, diagnosis, and surgical invasiveness, depressive symptoms improved more for more expectations fulfilled (p<.0001), more ODI improvement (p<.0001), and more pain improvement (p=.001). For anxiety symptoms: 59% were worse than population norms preoperatively and 26% were worse postoperatively; 73% had some improvement. In adjusted multivariable analyses, anxiety symptoms improved more for more expectations fulfilled (p=.0002), more ODI improvement (p<.0001), and more pain improvement (p=.03). Similar results were obtained according to threshold values and MCIDs.Conclusion
Substantial improvements in psychological well-being resulted after surgery among patients with favorable spine-specific outcomes. 相似文献13.
Howard M. Place Ann M. Hayes Stephen B. Huebner Andy M. Hayden Heidi Israel Jennifer L. Brechbuhler 《The spine journal》2017,17(10):1565-1569
Background Context
There has been renewed interest in the pelvic vertebrae by spinal surgeons recently. Those involved in working with patients with adult spinal deformity focus on the position of the fused spine as it relates to the pelvis, and determine success or failure by specific numbers for given pelvic parameters. The pelvic parameters that are commonly measured for these patients are pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence (PI). Out of the three, PI has always been considered to be the fixed measurement, whereas pelvic tilt and sacral slope have the capacity to change in relation to external forces. The assumption that the PI does not change has not been proven in a healthy, asymptomatic population.Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the differences in PI between three pelvic positions used in common functional activities: resting baseline pelvic posture, maximal anterior pelvic rotation, and maximal posterior pelvic rotation.Study Design/Setting
This was a randomized, prospective study of 50 healthy, asymptomatic, individuals who were recruited from the vicinity of our institution.Patient Sample
Fifty patients (16 men with a mean age of 26.5±12.1 years; 34 women with a mean age of 27.2±10.8 years) were recruited for this study. Initial screening occurred by telephone. The inclusion criteria consisted of participants being between 18 and 79 years of age, no previous history of spine, pelvic, or lower extremity pain which had lasted longer than 48 hours, or history of any disorder in the spine, pelvis, or lower extremity that had required medical care. Female patients could not be pregnant at the time of participation.Outcome Measures
Changes in PI were assessed by examining the differences between the values of the PI with each change in pelvic position: resting to maximal anterior pelvic rotation and resting to maximal posterior pelvic rotation. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.Methods
This study was funded by a Small Exploratory Grant from the Scoliosis Research Society. All subjects had an initial posterior-anterior and lateral radiograph taken in their resting pelvic position. If no spinal deformity was noted, each subject was instructed to maximally rotate their pelvis anteriorly and an immediate lateral radiograph was taken. The subject was then instructed to maximally rotate their pelvis posteriorly and an immediate lateral radiograph was again taken. Radiographic measurements of PI were independently measured by a board-certified, fellowship trained orthopedic spine surgeon and a board-certified musculoskeletal radiologist after defining and agreeing to the specific manner of measurement.Results
Pelvic incidence values changed in 44 of 50 subjects (88%) when they maximally anteriorly rotated their pelvis from the resting pelvic position. The mean change was 2.9°, with 23 of 50 subjects (46%) changing ≥3°. Pelvic incidence values changed in 40 of 50 subjects (80%) when they maximally posteriorly rotated their pelvis from the resting position. The mean change was 2.82° with 27 of 50 subjects (54%) changing by ≥3°.Conclusions
This study demonstrated that for a high percentage of the healthy subjects who participated, the PI changed when the subjects varied their pelvic position. This questions the assumption that PI is a fixed parameter and suggests a potential functional motion at the sacroiliac joint. It also supports the idea that intentionally changing one's posture could lead to a change in PI, an idea that could have ramifications in surgical cases. 相似文献14.
Mitsuru Yagi Hideaki Ohne Tsunehiko Konomi Kanehiro Fujiyoshi Shinjiro Kaneko Masakazu Takemitsu Masafumi Machida Yoshiyuki Yato Takashi Asazuma 《The spine journal》2017,17(3):409-417
Background Context
Gait patterns and their relationship to demographic and radiographic data in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) have not been fully documented.Purpose
This study aimed to assess gait pattern in patients with ASD and the effect of corrective spinal surgery on gait.Design/Setting
This is a prospective case series.Patient Sample
The gait patterns of 33 consecutive women with ASD (age 67.1 years; body mass index [BMI] 22.5±2.5?kg/m2, Cobb angle 46.8±18.2°, coronal vertical axis [CVA] 1.5±3.7?cm, C7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA] 9.1±6.4?cm, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI?LL] 38.2±22.1°, and lean volume of the lower leg, 5.5±0.6?kg) before and after corrective surgery were compared with those of 33 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers.Outcome Measures
Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire (SRS22r), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and forceplate analysis.Methods
All subjects underwent gait analysis on a custom-built forceplate using optical markers placed on all joints and spinal processes. Dual X-ray absorptiometry scores were used to calculate the lean composition of the lower legs. Subjects with ASD were followed for at least 2 years post operation.Results
Preop mean values showed that patients with ASD had a significantly worse gait velocity (54±10?m/min vs. 70.7±12.9?m/min, p<.01) and stride (97.8±13.4?cm vs. 115.3±15.1?cm, p<.01), but no difference was observed in the stance-to-swing ratio. The right and left ground reaction force vectors were also discordant in the ASD group (vertical direction; r=0.84 vs. r=.97, p=.01). The hip range of motion (ROM) was also significantly decreased in ASD. Correlation coefficient showed moderate correlations between the preoperative gait velocity and the gravity line (GL), PI, ROM of the lower extremity joints, and lean volume, and between the stride and the lean volume, GL, and PI?LL. Gait pattern, stride, and velocity all improved significantly in the patients with ASD after surgery, but were still not as good as in healthy volunteers. The SRS22r satisfaction domain correlated moderately with postoperative gait velocity (r=0.34).Conclusions
The patients with ASD had an asymmetric gait pattern and impaired gait ability compared with healthy volunteers. Gait ability correlated significantly with the GL, spinopelvic alignment, lower extremity joint ROM, and lean volume. The surgical correction of spinopelvic alignment and exercises to build muscle strength may improve the gait pattern and ability in patients with ASD. 相似文献15.
Mark C. Lee Casey Jarvis Matthew J. Solomito Jeffrey D. Thomson 《The spine journal》2018,18(4):648-654
Background Context
Many pelvic fixation options exist for posterior spinal fusion of pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis, including standard iliac screws (SISs) or a more recently introduced S2-Alar (S2A) technique. However, little data exist comparing the clinical and radiographic outcomes of these techniques.Purpose
This study aimed to dentify differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes for pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis patients treated with SIS or S2A pelvic fixation.Study Design/Setting
This was a retrospective cohort study at a pediatric orthopedic clinic.Patient Sample
Patients aged 8–19 years undergoing posterior spinal fusion to the pelvis for neuromuscular scoliosis using SIS or S2A technique, with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level 4 or 5 were included.Outcomes Measures
Postoperative complication rates associated with pelvic fixation method were the outcome measures.Methods
Charts and radiographs were reviewed for demographics, intra- and postoperative course, levels of instrumentation, operative correction, and implant failure (IF). Postoperative complications were classified according to the Accordion scale.Results
We studied 50 patients (28 SIS, 22 S2A) aged 14.0±2.8 years and an average follow-up of 3.5±1.7 years. The average number of levels fused was 16.5±1.1 with an average curve correction of 48°±21° postoperatively. A significant difference in radiographic IF rates was noted between SIS and S2A groups (57% vs. 27%, p=.02). No difference was noted between groups for frequency or severity of postoperative complications, inclusive of wound infections. Subgroup analysis demonstrated equivalent IF rates when comparing the S2A group with the SIS group with cross-links.Conclusions
The S2A group generally demonstrated improved rates of radiographic IF compared with the SIS group, but the rates became equivalent when a cross-link was added to an SIS construct. Further, no difference in postoperative complication rates were identified between SIS and S2A groups. 相似文献16.
Armin Arshi Justin Sharim Don Y. Park Howard Y. Park Hamed Yazdanshenas Nicholas M. Bernthal Arya N. Shamie 《The spine journal》2017,17(5):645-655
Background Context
Osteosarcoma (OGS) and Ewing sarcoma (EWS) are the two classic primary malignant bone tumors. Due to the rarity of these tumors, evidence on demographics, survival determinants, and treatment outcomes for primary disease of the spine are limited and derived from small case series.Purpose
To use population-level data to determine the epidemiology and prognostic indicators in patients with OGS and EWS of the osseous spine.Study Design/Setting
Large-scale retrospective study.Patient Sample
Patients diagnosed with OGS and EWS of the spine in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 1973 to 2012.Outcome Measures
Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).Methods
Two separate queries of the SEER registry were performed to identify patients with OGS and EWS of the osseous spine from 1973–2012. Study variables included age, sex, race, year of diagnosis, tumor size, extent of disease (EOD), and treatment with surgery and/or radiation therapy. Primary outcome was defined as OS and DSS in months. Univariate survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.Results
The search identified 648 patients with primary OGS and 736 patients with primary EWS of the spine from 1973 to 2012. Mean age at diagnosis was 48.1 and 19.9 years for OGS and EWS, respectively, with OGS showing a bimodal distribution. The median OS and DSS were 1.3 and 1.7 years, respectively, for OGS, with OGS in Paget's disease having worse OS (0.7 years) relative to the mean (log-rank p=.006). The median OS and DSS for EWS were 3.9 and 4.3 years, respectively. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that age (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001), decade of diagnosis (OS p=.049), surgical resection (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001), and EOD (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001) were independent positive prognostic indicators for spinal OGS; radiation therapy predicted worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48, confidence interval [CI] 1.05–2.10, p=.027) and DSS (HR 1.74, CI 1.13–2.66, p=.012) for OGS. For EWS, age (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001), surgical resection (OS p=.030, DSS p=.046), tumor size (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001), and EOD (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001) were independent determinants of improved survival; radiation therapy trended toward improved survival but did not achieve statistical significance for both OS (HR 0.76, CI 0.54–1.07, p=.113) and DSS (0.76, CI 0.54, 1.08, p=.126).Conclusions
Age, surgical resection, and EOD are key survival determinants for both OGS and EWS of the spine. Radiation therapy may be associated with worse outcomes in patients with OGS, and is of potential benefit in EWS. Overall prognosis has improved in patients with OGS of the spine over the last four decades. 相似文献17.
Philip K. Louie Arya G. Varthi Ankur S. Narain Victor Lei Daniel D. Bohl Grant D. Shifflett Frank M. Phillips 《The spine journal》2018,18(11):2025-2032
Background Context
Revision posterior decompression and fusion surgery for patients with symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is associated with significant morbidity and is technically challenging. The use of a stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in patients with symptomatic ASD may prevent many of the complications associated with revision posterior surgery.Purpose
The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent stand-alone LLIF for symptomatic ASD.Study Design
This is a retrospective case series.Patient Sample
We retrospectively reviewed patients with a prior posterior instrumented fusion who underwent a subsequent stand-alone LLIF for ASD by a single surgeon. All patients had at least 18 months of follow-up. Patients were diagnosed with symptomatic ASD if they had a previous lumbar fusion with the subsequent development of back pain, neurogenic claudication, or lower extremity radiculopathy in the setting of imaging, which demonstrated stenosis, spondylolisthesis, kyphosis, or scoliosis at the adjacent level.Outcome Measures
Patient-reported outcomes were obtained at preoperative and final follow-up visits using the Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], visual analog scale (VAS)—back, and VAS—leg. Radiographic parameters were measured, including segmental and overall lordoses, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, coronal alignment, and intervertebral disc height.Methods
Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared between preoperative and final follow-up using paired t tests.Results
Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62.0±11.3 years. The average follow-up was 34.8±22.4 months. Fifteen (60%) underwent stand-alone LLIF surgery for radicular leg pain, 7 (28%) for symptoms of claudication, and 25 (100.0%) for severe back pain. Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved from preoperative values (46.6±16.4) to final follow-up (30.4±16.8, p=.002). Visual analog scale—back (preop 8.4±1.0, postop 3.2±1.9; p<.001), and VAS—leg (preop 3.6±3.4, postop 1.9±2.6; p<.001) scores significantly improved following surgery. Segmental and regional lordoses, as well as intervertebral disc height, significantly improved (p<.001) and remained stable (p=.004) by the surgery. Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch significantly improved at the first postoperative visit (p=.029) and was largely maintained at the most recent follow-up (p=.45). Six patients suffered from new-onset thigh weakness following LLIF surgery, but all showed complete resolution within 6 weeks. Three patients required subsequent additional surgeries, all of which were revised to include posterior instrumentation.Conclusions
Stand-alone LLIF is a safe and effective approach with low morbidity and acceptable complication rates for patients with symptomatic ASD following a previous lumbar fusion. 相似文献18.
Peter G. Passias Gregory W. Poorman Cyrus M. Jalai Breton Line Bassel Diebo Paul Park Robert Hart Douglas Burton Frank Schwab Virginie Lafage Shay Bess Thomas Errico 《The spine journal》2017,17(8):1091-1099
Background Context
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) represents a constellation of complex malalignments affecting the spinal column. Corrective surgical procedures aimed at improving ASD can be equally challenging, and commonly require multiple index procedures and potential revisions before definitive management. There is a paucity of data comparing the outcomes of same-day(simultaneous [SIM]) and 2-day (staged [STA]) procedures for long spinal fusions for ASD. Using a large patient cohort with surgeon- and patient-reported outcomes will be particularly useful in determining the utility and effect of staging long spinal fusions for ASD.Purpose
This study aimed to compare intraoperative, perioperative, and 2-year outcomes of STA and SIM procedures correcting ASD.Study Design
This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter database.Patient Sample
A total of 142 patients (71 STA, 71 SIM) were included.Outcome Measures
Primary outcome measures were intra- and perioperative (6 weeks) complication rates. Secondary outcome measures were 2-year thoracolumbar and spinopelvic radiographic parameters, 2-year health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] and Short Form-36 [SF-36]), and 2-year complication rates.Methods
Inclusion criteria included patients with ASD ≥18 years with 6-week and 2-year follow-up. Propensity score matching identified similar patients undergoing STA or SIM long spinal fusions based on surgical invasiveness, pelvic tilt, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Complications, HRQoL scores (Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire [SRS-22r], SF-36, ODI), and patient characteristics were compared across and within treatment groups at follow-up with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t tests at three surgical stages: intraoperatively, perioperatively (6 weeks), and postoperatively (>6 weeks).Results
A total of 142 patients were included (71 STA, 71 SIM). Matching STA and SIM groups based on degree of deformity and surgical invasiveness created two groups similar in overall correction of the surgery. Patients undergoing STA underwent more anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) procedures, whereas patients undergoing SIM had longer fusions. Charlson comorbidity index and revision status were similar between groups (p>.05). Staging procedures had significantly more complications causing reoperation (STA: 47% vs. SIM: 8%, p=.021), and had a greater number of perioperative complications requiring a return to the operating room (OR) (STA: 9.9% vs. SIM: 1.4%, p=.029). There was no difference in intraoperative complications, mortality, or perioperative infection or wound complications (p>.05) between the two procedures. At 2-year follow-up, incidence of revision surgery was higher in STA (STA: 21.1% vs. SIM: 8.5%, p=.033).Conclusion
Staged spinal fusions, which add ALIFs and LLIFs to the procedure, compared with similar-correction SIM procedures, result in similar intraoperative complication incidence, but significantly higher rates of peri- and postoperative complications leading to revision. Functional outcomes, radiographic parameters, and mortality were similar. This will aid surgeons in their determination of the optimal treatment for such complex procedures. 相似文献19.
Louis Boissière Mitsuru Takemoto Anouar Bourghli Jean-Marc Vital Ferran Pellisé Ahmet Alanay Caglar Yilgor Emre Acaroglu Francisco Javier Perez-Grueso Frank Kleinstück Ibrahim Obeid 《The spine journal》2017,17(4):480-488
Background Context:
Many radiological parameters have been reported to correlate with patient's disability including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI?LL). European literature reports other parameters such as lumbar lordosis index (LLI) and the global tilt (GT). If most parameters correlate with health-related quality of life scores (HRQLs), their impact on disability remains unclear.Purpose
This study aimed to validate these parameters by investigating their correlation with HRQLs. It also aimed to evaluate the relationship between each of these sagittal parameters and HRQLs to fully understand the impact in adult spinal deformity management.Study Design
A retrospective review of a multicenter, prospective database was carried out.Patient Sample
The database inclusion criteria were adults (>18 years old) presenting any of the following radiographic parameters: scoliosis (Cobb ≥20°), SVA ≥5?cm, thoracic kyphosis ≥60° or PT ≥25°. All patients with complete data at baseline were included.Outcome Measures
Health-related quality of life scores, demographic variables (DVs), and radiographic parameters were collected at baseline.Methods
Differences in HRQLs among groups of each DV were assessed with analyses of variance. Correlations between radiographic variables and HRQLs were assessed using the Spearman rank correlation. Multivariate linear regression models were fitted for each of the HRQLs (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Scoliosis Research Society-22 subtotal score, or physical component summaries) with sagittal parameters and covariants as independent variables. A p<.05 value was considered statistically significant.Results
Among a total of 755 included patients (mean age, 52.1 years), 431 were non-surgical candidates and 324 were surgical candidates. Global tilt and LLI significantly correlated with HRQLs (r=0.4 and ?0.3, respectively) for univariate analysis. Demographic variables such as age, gender, body mass index, past surgery, and surgical or non-surgical candidate were significant predictors of ODI score. The likelihood ratio tests for the addition of the sagittal parameters showed that SVA, GT, T1 sagittal tilt, PI?LL, and LLI were statistically significant predictors for ODI score even adjusted for covariates. The differences of R2 values from Model 1 were 1.5% at maximum, indicating that the addition of sagittal parameters to the reference model increased only 1.5% of the variance of ODI explained by the models.Conclusion
GT and LLI appear to be independent radiographic parameters impacting ODI variance. If most of the parameters described in the literature are correlated with ODI, the impact of these radiographic parameters is less than 2% of ODI variance, whereas 40% are explained by DVs. The importance of radiographic parameters lies more on their purpose to describe and understand the malalignment mechanisms than their univariate correlation with HRQLs. 相似文献20.
Martin N. Stienen Nicolas R. Smoll Holger Joswig Jan Snagowski Marco V. Corniola Karl Schaller Gerhard Hildebrandt Oliver P. Gautschi 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):807-813