The use of atypical antipsychotics in nursing homes

BACKGROUND: Use of atypical antipsychotics for "off-label" indications, such as behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, depression, and bipolar disorder, have been frequently reported, although not systematically studied. We describe the pattern of atypical antipsychotic use among nursing home residents and identify demographic and clinical correlates. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 139,714 nursing home residents living in 1732 nursing homes in 5 U.S. states from Jan. 1, 1999, to Jan. 31, 2000. Data were obtained from the computerized Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment records. RESULTS: Behavior problems associated with cognitive impairment were manifest in 86,514 residents, and, of these, 18.2% received an antipsychotic. Approximately 11% received an atypical antipsychotic, while 6.8% received a conventional agent. Clinical correlates of atypical antipsychotic use were Parkinson's disease (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.34 to 1.84), depression (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.24 to 1.46), antidepressant use (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.49), Alzheimer's disease (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.32), non-Alzheimer dementia (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.24), and cholinesterase inhibitor use (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.52 to 1.98). Severe functional impairment was inversely related to atypical antipsychotic use (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.89). CONCLUSION: Atypical antipsychotics are now used more than conventional antipsychotic agents in U.S. nursing homes. Indications and dosages seem appropriate relative to labeling. Clinical and demographic differences between atypical and conventional antipsychotic users tend to be relatively small, suggesting that other factors may explain the choice of prescribing physicians. The impact of facility factors, economic forces, and physician characteristics needs to be investigated.     

Antipsychotic drug use and associations with neuropsychiatric symptoms in persons with impaired cognition: a cross-sectional study

Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in cognitive disorders impair quality of life, increase caregiver stress, and may lead to earlier institutionalization and death. The objective of this study was to investigate the use of antipsychotics among persons with cognitive impairment in home care and residential care, and its associations with NPS and personal characteristics.

Methods: Data were collected in the South Savo Hospital District area with 105 000 inhabitants, where 66 of 68 institutions providing long-term residential care and 20 of 21 municipal home care producers joined the study. Nurses recorded the current use of drugs, the activities of daily living (ADL), prevalence of diagnosed dementia, and assessed the cognitive status and the prevalence of recent NPS based on the item list of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).

Results: The study population was 1909 persons with cognitive impairment, and 1188 of them lived in residential care. Antipsychotics were used by 563 (29.5%) persons in the whole study population. In residential care 448 (37.7%) used antipsychotics and the corresponding figure in home care was 115 (15.9%). In the multivariate analysis, the antipsychotic use was associated with living in residential care, benzodiazepine use, and with NPS symptoms agitation/aggression (OR =1.70, 95% CI =1.16–2.48), disinhibition (OR =2.33, 95% CI =1.31–4.15), hallucinations (OR =2.77, 95% CI =1.69–4.55), and delusions (OR =1.71, 95% CI =1.01–2.91).

Conclusions: Antipsychotic use was common among persons with cognitive impairment. The results suggest that antipsychotics are commonly used to treat hyperactivity and psychotic symptoms, especially in residential care.     

Incident diabetes associated with antipsychotic use in the United Kingdom general practice research database

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest an association between antipsychotic use and development or exacerbation of diabetes. This study evaluated the risk of incident diabetes associated with the use of atypical and conventional antipsychotics. METHOD: This nested case-control study included all patients in the U.K. General Practice Research Database treated with antipsychotic drugs between January 1994 and December 1998. The main outcome measures were the odds ratios of current (within prior 6 months) or recent (7 to 12 months) antipsychotic exposure among those with (N = 424) compared with those without incident diabetes (N = 1522). RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio for current use of any antipsychotic drug compared with no use in the past year among those with diabetes was 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 2.3). The adjusted odds ratio for current use of atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs compared with no use in the past year among those with diabetes was 4.7 (95% CI = 1.5 to 14.9) and 1.7 (95% CI = 1.2 to 2.3), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for recent use of conventional antipsychotic drugs compared with no use in the past year among those with diabetes was 1.0 (95% CI = 0.6 to 1.6). The odds ratio for recent atypical antipsychotic drug use could not be calculated because no study subjects had this exposure. CONCLUSION: This study showed an increased risk of incident diabetes among current users of atypical and conventional antipsychotic medications. These results were independent of other established risk factors. The larger association observed for atypical antipsychotic users should be regarded as preliminary given the small number of incident diabetes cases in this group.     

Disparities in use of antipsychotic medications among nursing home residents in Arkansas

Pilot work was conducted to determine whether there were racial disparities in the use of second-generation antipsychotic medications in a sample of 2,717 residents of nursing homes in Arkansas in 2001. Chi square analysis and a logistic regression model were used to examine the relationship between residents' race and likelihood of receiving a second-generation antipsychotic. Other independent variables included in the model were age, gender, and the location of the nursing home. The results indicated racial disparities in use of second-generation antipsychotics among the nursing home residents, with African-American residents less likely to receive these medications than residents from other racial or ethnic groups.     

A randomized,placebo-controlled trial of the discontinuation of long-term antipsychotics in dementia

The objectives of this randomized clinical trial were to investigate the impact of the discontinuation of long-term antipsychotics in residents with dementia in chronic care institutions and to identify clinical predictors of safe discontinuation. Subjects included 34 residents with dementia who were on antipsychotics for more than 6 months and whose behavior was currently stable. Subjects were randomized to either continue receiving their regular dosage of antipsychotics or to receive placebo for 6 months. Early withdrawal from the study was not statistically different between the groups (relative risk [RR] = 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-3.26), and though not significantly different, subjects in the placebo group were more likely to be withdrawn from the study because of worsening behavior (RR = 1.25, 95% Cl 0.33-4.76). Three subjects in the placebo group were withdrawn from the study due to worsening of extrapyramidal symptoms. The active treatment group had more behavioral problems (e.g., physical aggression towards others, p < .05) compared to the placebo group. The placebo group developed more apathy, but balancing this outcome was a relative improvement in cognitive functioning. Baseline antipsychotic dose was predictive of behavioral worsening upon discontinuation of long-term antipsychotic drugs. The primary limitation of the study was the small sample size. In conclusion, a trial of discontinuation of antipsychotics should be considered in this population.     

Atypical antipsychotics and risk of cerebrovascular accidents

OBJECTIVE: Randomized controlled trials have suggested that at least one atypical antipsychotic may be associated with an increased risk of stroke in older people with dementia. This study examined the association between atypical antipsychotic use and stroke in the elderly. METHOD: The authors conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients over the age of 66 by linking administrative health care databases. Three cohorts-users of typical antipsychotics, risperidone, and olanzapine-were identified and compared. RESULTS: Subjects treated with typical antipsychotics (N=1,015) were compared with those given risperidone (N=6,964) and olanzapine (N=3,421). Model-based estimates adjusted for covariates hypothesized to be associated with stroke risk revealed relative risk estimates of 1.1 (95% CI=0.5-2.3) for olanzapine and 1.4 (95% CI=0.7-2.8) for risperidone. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine and risperidone use were not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of stroke compared with typical antipsychotic use.     

Ethnicity and quality of antipsychotic prescribing among in-patients in south London

Ethnicity may influence treatment decisions in mental disorders. We undertook a survey of the prescribing of antipsychotics for in-patients in three south London mental health trusts. A total of 255 patients (152 White, 103 Black) were included. Median dose of antipsychotic (% of licensed dose) was 58.3% for White and 50.0% for Black patients (adjusted effect size=0.14, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.63). High-dose antipsychotics were prescribed to 15.1% of White and 11.7% of Black patients (adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.5, 95% CI 0.19-1.33), and antipsychotic polypharmacy was recorded for 25.7% and 31.1% respectively (adjusted OR=3.05, 95% CI 1.44-6.46). Prescribing quality was similar for Black and White patients.     

Risk Factors,Incidence, and Outcomes of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome on Long-Acting Injectable vs Oral Antipsychotics in a Nationwide Schizophrenia Cohort

IntroductionLong-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are associated with multiple positive outcomes in psychosis, but it is unclear whether LAIs are associated with worse outcomes if neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), a potentially lethal adverse effect, occurs.MethodsWe used nationwide and nationally representative databases of healthcare encounters in Finland to study the incidence and outcome predictors of NMS in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder between January 01, 1972 and December 31, 2017. Using a nested case-control design, we also explored differences by antipsychotic formulation (LAI vs oral antipsychotic [OAP]) and class (first-generation antipsychotic [FGA] vs second-generation antipsychotic [SGA]).ResultsOne hundred seventy-two NMS cases and 1441 sex-, age-, and diagnosis-matched controls were included (age = 58.8 ± 13.1 years, males = 59.9%). Incidence of NMS was 1.99 (1.98–2.00) per 10 000 person-years. The likelihood of developing NMS did not differ by antipsychotic formulation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.89, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]: 0.59–1.33, for LAIs vs OAPs) or class (FGA-OAP vs SGA-OAP [aOR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.66–1.76], FGA-LAI [aOR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52–1.53], SGA-LAI [aOR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.58–3.12]). NMS risk factors included antipsychotic treatment change: increased number (odds ratios [OR]: 5.00, 95% CI: 2.56–9.73); decreased number/switch (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.19–4.96); higher antipsychotic dose (>2DDDs–OR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.61–6.18); co-treatment with anticholinergics (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.57–3.24), lithium (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.30–3.58), benzodiazepines (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.44–3.58); and comorbid cardiovascular disease (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.22–2.45). Within 30 days, 4.7% of cases with NMS died (15.1% within 1 year) without differences by antipsychotic formulation. NMS reoccurred in 5 of 119 subjects (4.2%), after a median = 795 (range = 77–839) days after rechallenge with antipsychotics.ConclusionNMS remains a potentially life-threatening risk, yet these results should further contribute to mitigate concerns about LAI safety regarding NMS onset or outcomes, including mortality.     

Outpatient antipsychotic treatment and inpatient costs of schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportions of acute care inpatient admissions and hospital days for schizophrenia patients in the Medicaid program that are attributable to gaps in outpatient antipsychotic treatment and to calculate the corresponding total health care costs of this care. METHODS: A series of multivariate regressions were performed with statewide 2001-2003 California Medicaid data to estimate the fraction of acute care hospital admissions and hospital days for schizophrenia attributable to gaps in antipsychotic medication treatment. This fraction was then applied to national estimates of the number and costs of inpatient treatment episodes for patients with schizophrenia in the national Medicaid program. RESULTS: In the United States, there are roughly 87 000 annual acute care inpatient admissions of Medicaid patients for the treatment of schizophrenia. These admissions include a total of approximately 930 000 hospital days at a total cost of $806 million. Improving adherence to eliminate gaps in antipsychotic medication treatment could lower the number of acute care admissions by approximately 12.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.7%-12.6%) and reduce the number of inpatient treatment days by approximately 13.1% (CI: 9.8%-16.5%) resulting in a savings of approximately $106 million (95% CI: $79.0 million-$133.0 million) in inpatient care costs for the national Medicaid system. CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence to antipsychotic medication treatment accounts for a considerable proportion of inpatient treatment costs of Medicaid patients with schizophrenia. Improving continuity of antipsychotic medications could lead to savings by reducing the frequency and duration of inpatient treatment.     

Psychiatric opinion and antipsychotic selection in the management of schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES: This study examined psychiatrists' opinions regarding the use of second-generation antipsychotics for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. It then sought to identify factors associated with these opinions. METHODS: A national survey was conducted (September 2003-January 2004) of psychiatrists engaged in the management of patients with schizophrenia. RESULTS: Among survey respondents (N=431), most psychiatrists (88%) believed that one or more of the five currently available second-generation antipsychotics could improve treatment-resistant positive symptoms after a failed trial of optimal oral haloperidol treatment. Psychiatrists who reported familiarity with schizophrenia practice guidelines were more likely to have high levels of optimism that these medications improve positive symptoms (odds ratio [OR]=3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.4-9.3, p=.009). Psychiatrists who met with a pharmaceutical representative at least once a week were also more likely to have high levels of optimism toward second-generation antipsychotics (OR=2.3, CI=1.4-3.9, p=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reported familiarity with treatment guidelines and frequent contact with pharmaceutical representatives appear to be associated with optimism toward second-generation antipsychotics.