The impact of coagulation parameters on the outcomes of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia requiring intensive care unit admission

Introduction

Coagulation abnormalities are frequent in patients with severe infections. However, the predictive value of d-dimer and of the presence of associated coagulation derangements in severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains to be thoroughly evaluated. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of coagulation parameters in patients with severe CAP admitted to the intensive care unit.

Methods

d-Dimer, antithrombin, International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis score, clinical variables, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and the CURB-65 score were measured in the first 24 hours. Results are shown as median (25%-75% interquartile range). The main outcome measure was hospital mortality.

Results

Ninety patients with severe CAP admitted to the intensive care unit were evaluated. Overall hospital mortality was 15.5%. d-Dimer levels in nonsurvivors were higher than those in survivors. In the univariate analysis, d-dimer, SOFA, and APACHE II scores were predictors of death. The discriminative ability of d-dimer (area under receiver operating curve = 0.75 [95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.83]; best cutoff for d-dimer was 1798 ng/mL) for in-hospital mortality was comparable with APACHE II and SOFA and better than C-reactive protein. Moreover, the addition of d-dimer to APACHE II or SOFA score increased the discriminative ability of both scores (area under the receiver operating curve = 0.82 [0.72-0.89] and 0.84 [0.75-0.91], respectively).

Conclusions

d-Dimer levels are good predictors of outcome in severe CAP and may augment the predictive ability of scoring systems as APACHE II and SOFA.     

The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score as a descriptor of patient outcome in septic shock compared with two other scoring systems.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate if daily Multiple Organ Dysfunction scoring could describe outcome groups in septic shock better than daily Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Organ Failure scores. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: A medical and surgical adult intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary referral center. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Daily data collection over a 14-month period was performed on 368 ICU patients, 39 of whom developed septic shock while in the ICU. These data were entered into a computer programmed to calculate APACHE II, Organ Failure, and Multiple Organ Dysfunction scores. The admission Multiple Organ Dysfunction scores for nonsurvivors and survivors of septic shock in the ICU was 6.5 +/- 2.7 and 6.6 +/- 2.8 (SD), respectively. These patients deteriorated due to the development of septic shock during their ICU stay resulting in a maximum Multiple Organ Dysfunction score of 12.2 +/- 3.7 in nonsurvivors and 9.4 +/- 2.7 in survivors (p < .05). The difference between the maximum and initial Multiple Organ Dysfunction scores (delta score) was also significantly greater in nonsurvivors than in survivors (5.6 +/- 4.7 vs. 2.8 +/- 3.0) (p < .05). There were no significant differences between the maximum and delta scores in the outcome groups using the APACHE II and Organ Failure scoring systems. These results were mirrored by 2.3 +/- 0.7 and 1.7 +/- 0.5 organ failures in nonsurvivors and survivors, respectively (p < .01). For all 368 patients, the initial and maximum Multiple Organ Dysfunction scores were 3.5 +/- 2.5 and 10.5 +/- 3.6, respectively. CONCLUSION: Maximum and delta Multiple Organ Dysfunction scores mirrored organ dysfunction and could accurately describe the outcome groups, whereas daily APACHE II and Organ Failure scores could not.     

Comparison of multiple organ dysfunction scores in the prediction of hospital mortality in the critically ill

OBJECTIVE: To compare the scales and predictive power for hospital mortality of three recent multiple organ dysfunction scores. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, validation cohort study. SETTING: A ten-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit in a Finnish tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Among the 591 consecutive patients admitted, 520 patients who stayed >4 hrs were studied. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical and laboratory data were collected daily. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score, Logistic Organ Dysfunction score, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score all were calculated and compared for hospital mortality. The areas under receiver operating curves (SE) for day-1 scores were 0.825 (0.02) for APACHE III, 0.805 (0.02) for Logistic Organ Dysfunction, 0.776 (0.02) for SOFA, and 0.695 (0.02) for Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score in prediction of hospital mortality. The highest discriminative power was revealed with total maximum scores. No statistical differences existed between the total maximum scores (p values,.06 to.97). Calibration was good for all scores of day-1 multiple organ dysfunction scales and APACHE III by chi-square test (values between 10.14 and 5.42). CONCLUSIONS: Discriminative power (ability to distinguish between patients who die and those who live) of day-1, of daily maximum, and especially of total maximum multiple organ dysfunction scores, were rather good, comparable with each other, and comparable with APACHE III in prediction of hospital mortality.     

A multicenter, prospective validation of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: comparing current criteria

OBJECTIVES: To validate scoring algorithm criteria established by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and to evaluate its diagnostic property by comparing the two leading scoring systems for DIC, from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter study during a 3-month period. SETTING: General critical care center in a tertiary care hospital. Patients: Two hundred seventy-three patients with platelet counts<150x109/L were enrolled. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The JAAM, JMHW, and ISTH DIC scoring algorithms were prospectively applied within 12 hrs of patients meeting the inclusion criteria (day 0) to days 1-3, by global coagulation tests. The numbers of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were determined simultaneously. Mortality associated with any cause was also assessed 28 days after the enrollment. All global coagulation tests and SIRS criteria adopted in the JAAM criteria and their cutoff points were validated with use of SOFA scores and mortality rate. DIC diagnostic rate of the JAAM DIC scoring system was significantly higher than that of the other two criteria (p<.001). The JAAM DIC algorithm was the most sensitive for early diagnosis of DIC (p<.001). Patients who fulfilled the JAAM DIC criteria included almost all those whose DIC was diagnosed by the JMHW and ISTH scoring systems. The JAAM DIC scores showed significant correlation with SOFA scores ([rho]=0.499; p<.001). SOFA score and mortality rate worsened in accordance with an increase in the JAAM DIC score. Fibrinogen criteria had little effect in predicting outcome for the DIC patients, and a total score of 4 points in the JAAM scoring system without fibrinogen was closely related to poor prognosis. According to the results, we revised the JAAM criteria by excluding fibrinogen and confirmed that the DIC diagnostic properties of original criteria remained unchanged in the revised JAAM criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The JAAM scoring system has an acceptable property for the diagnosis of DIC. The scoring system identified most of the patients diagnosed by the JMHW and ISTH criteria. Revised JAAM DIC criteria preserved all properties of the original criteria for DIC diagnosis. The revised scoring system can be useful for selecting DIC patients for early treatment in a critical care setting.     

Modified score for disseminated intravascular coagulation in the critically ill

Objective To assess the value of the diagnosis of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria and that of the parameters included in the ISTH score for overt DIC in predicting day 28 mortality in intensive care patients. Also, to assess the value of the components of the score in the diagnosis of overt DIC.Design and setting Retrospective clinical study in a university hospital intensive care unit.Patients and participants 494 consecutive patients admitted in the ICU between January 2002 and October 2003.Measurements and results Clinical and laboratory data, including hemostatic parameters, were collected from computerized databases and patient files. Altogether 19% (95/494) of the patients fulfilled the criteria for overt DIC. Their day 28 mortality rate was higher than that of patients without overt DIC (40% vs. 16%). The lowest platelet count (area under curve, AUC, 0.910), highest plasma D-dimer (AUC 0.846), lowest antithrombin (AUC 0.823), and Owren-type prothrombin time activity (AUC 0.797) discriminated well the patients with and without overt DIC, whereas plasma fibrinogen (AUC 0.690) had poor discriminative power. No patient with the diagnosis of overt DIC had decreased plasma fibrinogen. Day-1 SOFA and APACHE II score, the first CRP measurement, and the lowest antithrombin were independent predictors of day 28 mortality.Conclusions The diagnosis of overt DIC was not an independent predictor of day 28 mortality. In ICU patients plasma antithrombin seems a promising candidate in the panel of indicators for overt DIC whereas the value of plasma fibrinogen is in doubt.     

Effects of antithrombin and gabexate mesilate on disseminated intravascular coagulation: a preliminary study

Purpose

We hypothesized that antithrombin is more effective for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) than is gabexate mesilate, which is a protease inhibitor, suggested from the previous studies. Initially, we compared the effects of antithrombin and gabexate mesilate for treating infection-related DIC.

Methods

Sixteen adult patients with a diagnosis of DIC with infection who were assessed with an acute DIC score 4 or higher at the admission to the intensive care unit were divided into antithrombin-treated and gabexate mesilate–treated groups. White blood cell counts, C-reactive protein, platelet counts, antithrombin, fibrin and fibrinogen degradation product, d-dimer, fibrinogen, thrombin antithrombin complex, plasmin plasminogen complex, prothrombin time, and activated partial thrombin time were measured on the day of admission and on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 thereafter. Mortality over 28 days was also compared.

Results

Platelet counts and antithrombin were significantly higher in the antithrombin group on day 7 and on days 5 and 7, respectively. Antithrombin increased to the normal level on day 1 in the antithrombin group but on day 7 in the gabexate mesilate group. C-reactive protein, fibrinogen degradation product, d-dimer, thrombin antithrombin complex, plasmin plasminogen complex, and prothrombin time were lower in the antithrombin group; but the differences were not significant. The 28-day mortality was 2 of 8 in the antithrombin group and 3 of 8 in the gabexate mesilate group, but they were not significantly different.

Conclusions

Antithrombin may be a more effective treatment for coagulation and fibrinolysis disorders than gabexate mesilate in infection-related DIC, but there was no difference in 28-day mortality.     

弥散性血管内凝血评分在脓毒症中的应用

目的 研究弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)评分系统与脓毒症患者病情评估及预后间的关系.方法 回顾性分析2005年1月-2008年12月本院重症监护病房(ICU)收治315例脓毒症患者的资料,按住院28 d的预后分为生存组(194例)与死亡组(121例).比较两组患者血小板计数(PLT)、纤维蛋白原(Fib)、凝血酶原时间(PT)及纤维蛋白单体的差异;用logistic单因素回归分析急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分、DIC评分与预后的关系,评价APACHEⅡ评分、DIC评分在脓毒症诊断中的价值.结果 死亡组PLT、Fib显著低于生存组,PT、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、凝血时间(ACT)和纤维蛋白单体值显著高于生存组,且APACHEⅡ评分、DIC评分显著高于生存组(P<0.05或P<0.01).APACHEⅡ评分、DIC评分与脓毒症预后间均呈显著正相关[DIC评分:χ2=17.741,P<0.001,优势比(OR)=1.413,95%可信区间(CI)为1.203～1.659;APACHEⅡ评分:χ2=36.456,P<0.001,OR=1.109,95%CI为1.072～1.147].APACHEⅡ评分曲线下面积(0.706)高于DIC评分曲线下面积(0.611).结论 APACHEⅡ评分、DIC评分均可作为脓毒症预后的预测指标,但DIC评分对脓毒症的诊断和预后判断价值低于APACHEⅡ评分.     

Scoring systems for prediction of mortality in patients with intensive care unit-acquired sepsis: a comparison of the Pitt bacteremia score and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring systems

This study compares the effectiveness of the Pitt bacteremia score, the Charlson weighted index of comorbidity, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring systems for the prediction of mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis using the retrospective observational method on 134 patients with ICU-acquired sepsis. The statistical analyses show several important findings. First, Pitt bacteremia score is significantly correlated with the APACHE II scoring system (correlation coefficient = 0.738, P < 0.001). Second, the APACHE II scoring system, the Pitt bacteremia score, and the Charlson weighted index of comorbidity are independently correlated with mortality. Third, the Pitt bacteremia score and the APACHE II scores are positively related to mortality in patients with ICU-acquired sepsis. As the result of the analyses, the mortality rate in patients with sepsis in the ICU is better predicted with the Pitt bacteremia score because it provides better estimation of sensitivity and specificity than the APACHE II scoring system and the Charlson weighted index of comorbidity.     

Dynamic evolution of coagulopathy in the first day of severe sepsis: relationship with mortality and organ failure

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changes in coagulation biomarkers during the first day of severe sepsis correlate with progression from single to multiple organ failure and subsequent death. DESIGN: Analysis of secondary endpoints in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational clinical trial (PROWESS). SETTING: The study involved 164 medical centers. PATIENTS: A total of 840 patients who met criteria for severe sepsis and were randomized to receive placebo plus supportive care. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Coagulation biomarkers, prothrombin time, antithrombin activity, and D-dimer and protein C levels were measured, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was performed daily. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified baseline antithrombin activity <54% and changes in prothrombin time, D-dimer, and antithrombin activity during the first calendar day after the onset of the first sepsis-induced organ dysfunction (i.e., the first day of severe sepsis, day 1) as predictive of 28-day mortality (p < or = .01). A composite coagulopathy score was determined using points for predetermined levels of change from baseline to day 1. The composite coagulopathy score correlated with progression from single to multiple organ failure (p = .0007), time to resolution of organ failure (p = .0004), and 28-day mortality (p < .0001). Combining the composite coagulopathy score with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score improved ability to identify patients who would progress to multiple organ failure (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.61 APACHE II vs. 0.65 APACHE II + composite coagulopathy score) and who would die (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.69 APACHE II vs. 0.74 APACHE II + composite coagulopathy score). CONCLUSIONS: Continuation or worsening of coagulopathy during the first day of severe sepsis was associated with increased development of new organ failure and 28-day mortality. These results further suggest that coagulation abnormalities contribute to organ failure and death.     

Multiple organ dysfunction associated with severe acute pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE: To compare three different multiple organ dysfunction scores in predicting hospital mortality rates and to discover which one best assesses organ dysfunction/failure in patients with severe acute pancreatitis in a general intensive care unit. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Surgical department and a ten-bed general intensive care unit in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Among the 178 consecutive patients admitted to the surgical department with severe acute pancreatitis from 1994 to 1998, 113 patients treated in the general intensive care unit underwent study. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical and laboratory data were collected during a period of 35 days. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and Logistic Organ Dysfunction (LOD) score were calculated and compared regarding hospital mortality rate. In addition, daily maximum score and a total maximum score (sum of the highest values for each organ dysfunction) were calculated for all three scores. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used as a measure of accuracy of the scores. The highest accuracy was revealed with daily maximum scores with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.847 for SOFA, 0.844 for MOD, and 0.836 for LOD. According to the maximum SOFA score, the highest mortality rate was associated with liver (83%, p <.001) and renal (63%, p <.001) failures. The mortality ratio with two organ failures ranged from 50% to 91%. The highest mortality rate (91%) was for a combination of hepatic and renal failure. In multiple logistic regression analysis, only hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular failure and previous cardiovascular medication were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe acute pancreatitis, organ dysfunction scores (MOD, SOFA, LOD) show good accuracy, comparable with APACHE II in predicting hospital mortality. The maximum daily organ dysfunction scores were simple and useful in assessing multiple organ dysfunction and in predicting hospital mortality rates of patients with severe acute pancreatitis.     

Epidemiology of severe sepsis in Japanese intensive care units: A prospective multicenter study

Severe sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). We conducted a prospective multicenter study to evaluate epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in Japanese ICUs. The patients were registered at 15 general critical care centers in Japanese tertiary care hospitals when diagnosed as having severe sepsis. Of 14,417 patients, 624 (4.3%) were diagnosed with severe sepsis. Demographic and clinical characteristics at enrollment (Day 1), physiologic and blood variables on Days 1 and 4, and mortality were evaluated. Mean age was 69.0 years, and initial mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were 23.4 and 8.6, respectively. The 28-day mortality was 23.1%, and overall hospital mortality was 29.5%. SOFA score and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score were consistently higher in nonsurvivors than survivors on Days 1 and 4. SOFA score, DIC score on Days 1 and 4, and hospital mortality were higher in patients with than without septic shock. SOFA score on Days 1 and 4 and hospital mortality were higher in patients with than without DIC. Logistic regression analyses showed age, presence of septic shock, DIC, and cardiovascular dysfunction at enrollment to be predictors of 28-day mortality and presence of comorbidity to be an additional predictor of hospital mortality. Presence of septic shock or DIC resulted in approximately twice the mortality of patients without each factor, whereas the presence of comorbidity may be a significant predictor of delayed mortality in severe sepsis.     

Prospective validation of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation

OBJECTIVES: A diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is hampered by the lack of an accurate diagnostic test. Based on the retrospective analysis of studies in patients with DIC, a scoring system (0-8 points) using simple and readily available routine laboratory tests has been proposed. The aim of this study was to prospectively validate this scoring system and assess its feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity in a consecutive series of intensive care patients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort of intensive care patients. SETTING: Adult intensive care unit in a tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with a clinical suspicion of disseminated intravascular coagulation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were followed during their admission to the intensive care unit, and the DIC score was calculated every 48 hrs and compared with a "gold standard" based on expert opinion. In addition, an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) waveform analysis, which has been reported to be a good predictor for the absence or presence of DIC, was performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed 660 samples from 217 consecutive patients. The prevalence of DIC was 34%. There was a strong correlation between an increasing DIC score and 28-day mortality (for each 1-point increment in the DIC score, the odds ratio for mortality was 1.25). The sensitivity of the DIC score was 91% and the specificity 97%. An abnormal aPTT waveform was seen in 32% of patients and correlated well with the presence of DIC (sensitivity 88%, specificity 97%). In 19% of patients, the aPTT waveform-based diagnosis of DIC preceded the diagnosis based on the scoring system. CONCLUSIONS: A diagnosis of DIC based on a simple scoring system, using widely available routine coagulation tests, is sufficiently accurate to make or reject a diagnosis of DIC in intensive care patients with a clinical suspicion of this condition. An aPTT waveform analysis is an interesting and promising tool to assist in the diagnostic management of DIC.     

Predictors of intensive care unit and hospital length of stay in diabetic ketoacidosis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value for prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and Logistic Organ Dysfunction System (LODS), and to identify associated characteristics. DESIGN: Prospective cohort, 18-month observation. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: All admissions to a 12-bed, inner-city, university-affiliated hospital, medical ICU from July 1999 to December 2000. MEASUREMENTS: Data for APACHE II and LODS scoring systems were collected within 24 hours of admission. Lengths of ICU and hospital stay were the primary outcomes. Prolonged ICU and hospital LOS were defined as 3 or more and 6 or more days. RESULTS: A total of 584 patients, mean age 49, 56% men, 82% African American were admitted to the ICU. At admission they had (mean +/-SD) APACHE II (18 +/- 10), LODS (5 +/- 4), and predicted mortality of 32% +/- 29%. DKA was the admitting diagnosis in 42 (7.6%) patients; they had lower APACHE II (12 +/- 6), LODS (2 +/- 1), and predicted mortality 5% +/- 5% than the general ICU population (all, P <.001). Hospital mortality in non-DKA patients was 18%; there were no deaths in patients with DKA. Among DKA patients, those with insulin noncompliance had a shorter hospital stay (2.8 +/- 1 d) than those with an underlying illness as the DKA trigger (4.8 +/- 3, P =.02). Between patients with DKA, regardless of the LOS, there were no significant differences in APACHE II, LODS, or predicted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: ICU-admitted patients with DKA are less ill, and have lower disease severity scores, mortality, and shorter length of ICU and hospital stay than non-DKA patients. Disease severity scores are not, but precipitating cause is, predictor associated with prolonged hospital LOS in patients with DKA.     

Treatment effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis with or without overt disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a serious condition associated with sepsis. Clinical management of DIC is hampered by lack of clear diagnostic criteria. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) has proposed a diagnostic scoring algorithm for overt DIC based on routine laboratory tests. The objective was to assess a modified version of the ISTH scoring system and determine the effect of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA, recombinant human activated protein C) on patients with DIC. The large database from the PROWESS clinical trial in severe sepsis was retrospectively used to assess a modified ISTH scoring system. Baseline characteristics and treatment effects of DrotAA were evaluated. At baseline, 29% (454/1568) of patients had overt DIC. Overt DIC was a strong predictor of mortality, independent of APACHE II score and age. Placebo-treated patients with overt DIC had higher mortality than patients without (43 vs. 27%). DrotAA-treated patients with overt DIC had a trend towards greater relative risk reduction in mortality than patients without (29 vs. 18%, P = 0.261) but both groups had greater relative risk reduction than placebo-treated patients. Serious bleeding rates during DrotAA infusion in patients with and without overt DIC were slightly increased (P = 0.498), compared with placebo, while clinically overt thrombotic events during the 28-day period were slightly reduced (P = 0.144). Modified ISTH overt DIC scoring may be useful as an independent assessment for identifying severe sepsis patients at high risk of death with a favorable risk/benefit profile for DrotAA treatment. Patients without overt DIC also received significant treatment benefit.     

Prognostic value of a simple evolving disseminated intravascular coagulation score in patients with severe sepsis

OBJECTIVE: We postulated that the coagulopathy initiated by the inflammatory response to severe sepsis would be reflected by changes in the platelet count and prothrombin time that convey prognostic information. To examine this hypothesis, we looked at the utility of a simple evolving disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score that awarded 1 point for each of the following: a) an absolute platelet count <100 x 10/L; b) a prothrombin time >15.0 secs; c) a 20% decrease in platelets; and d) a >0.3-sec increase in prothrombin time in predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Intensive care units of university medical center. PATIENTS: Patients were 163 critically ill severe sepsis patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were clinically classified as having capillary leak syndrome (n = 24), multiple organ failure with death from sepsis (n = 37), or multiple organ failure with recovery (n = 57) or as well (n = 45) if they showed rapid improvement in their modified Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS) score (which did not score for thrombocytopenia). Patients with capillary leak syndrome had the highest Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, modified MODS, and prothrombin time and the lowest platelet counts, whereas well patients had the most normal values. The simple evolving DIC score increased with worsening clinical class and was associated with worsening organ failure (increased modified MODS). Mortality rate increased from 10% for a simple evolving score of 0 to 73% for a score of 4 (p < .01). Overall, 86% of those with a score < or =1 survived, whereas 85% of those with a score of > or =2 developed multiple organ failure and half of them died from sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: The simple evolving DIC score calculated in the first 48 hrs from two readily available global coagulation markers appears to reflect the severity of the underlying disorder. It can be easily calculated at the bedside and provides useful prognostic information for the patient with severe sepsis.     

Comparison of disease severity scoring systems in septic shock

OBJECTIVE: To compare six disease severity scoring systems as predictors of mortality in septic shock when used in the first 24 hrs of diagnosis. The six scoring systems tested were: Multiorgan Failure; the Acute Organ System Failure; the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II); the Multisystem Organ Failure scoring system; the Mortality Prediction Model; and the grading of sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective, case series, consecutive sample. SETTING: Adult ICUs of three teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Seventy-one patients from 12 to 84 yrs, fulfilling specific criteria for the diagnosis of septic shock, who were admitted to the ICU during 15 consecutive months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Multiorgan Failure scoring system, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), and Acute Organ System Failure scoring system were found, with our modifications, to be statistically significant predictors of mortality. Predictive data for these three scoring systems were as follows: Multiorgan Failure scoring system p = .008, mean number of points of survivors 5.2 +/- 1.5 (SD), mean number of points of nonsurvivors 6.3 +/- 1.5; APACHE II p = .013, mean number of points of survivors 21.1 +/- 5.9, mean number of points of nonsurvivors 24.6 +/- 6.0; and Acute Organ System Failure scoring system p = .011. None of the other three scoring systems showed significant predictive ability: Multisystem Organ Failure scoring system p = .072, Mortality Prediction Model p = 0.091, and the grading of sepsis p = .27. There was a significant (p = .004) difference in the survival rate of the three hospitals. CONCLUSION: The Multiorgan Failure scoring system, APACHE II, and the Acute Organ System Failure scoring system, with minor modifications, were found to be useful prognostic tools for patients with septic shock and allowed us to compare the performance and treatment programs of different ICUs.     

Performance assessment of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II,the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score,and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in predicting the outcomes of adult patients with hepatic portal venous gas in the ED

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for predicting illness severity and the mortality of adult hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). This will assist emergency physicians in risk stratification.MethodsData for 48 adult HPVG patients who visited our ED between December 2009 and December 2013 were analyzed. The SAPS II, APACHE II score, and SOFA score were calculated based on the worst laboratory values in the ED. The probability of death was calculated for each patient based on these scores. The ability of the SAPS II, APACHE II score, and SOFA score to predict group mortality was assessed by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and calibration analysis.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 92.6%,71.4%, and 83.3%, respectively, for the SAPS II method; 77.8%, 81%, and 79.2%, respectively, for the APACHE II scoring system, and 77.8%, 76.2%, and 79.2%, respectively, for the SOFA score. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the areas under the curve for the SAPS II, APACHE II scoring system, and SOFA score were 0.910, 0.878, and 0.809, respectively.ConclusionThis is one of the largest series performed in a population of adult HPVG patients in the ED. The results from the present study showed that SAPS II is easier and more quickly calculated than the APACHE II and more superior in predicting the mortality of ED adult HPVG patients than the SOFA. We recommend that the SAPS II be used for outcome prediction and risk stratification in adult HPVG patients in the ED.     

Hemostasis during the early stages of trauma: comparison with disseminated intravascular coagulation

Introduction

We tested two hypotheses that disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and acute coagulopathy of trauma-shock (ACOTS) in the early phase of trauma are similar disease entities and that the DIC score on admission can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with coagulopathy of trauma.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 562 trauma patients, including 338 patients whose data were obtained immediately after admission to the emergency department. We collected serial data for the platelet counts, global markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis, and antithrombin levels. DIC was diagnosed according to the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) DIC scoring system, and ACOTS was defined as a prothrombin-time ratio of >1.2.

Results

The higher levels of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) and D-dimer and greater FDP/D-dimer ratios in the DIC patients suggested DIC with the fibrinolytic phenotype. The DIC patients with the fibrinolytic phenotype exhibited persistently lower platelet counts and fibrinogen levels, increased prothrombin time ratios, higher FDP and D-dimer levels, and lower antithrombin levels compared with the non-DIC patients on arrival to the emergency department and during the early stage of trauma. Almost all ACOTS patients met the criteria for a diagnosis of DIC; therefore, the same changes were observed in the platelet counts, global markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis, and antithrombin levels as noted in the DIC patients. The JAAM DIC score obtained immediately after arrival to the emergency department was an independent predictor of massive transfusion and death due to trauma and correlated with the amount of blood transfused.

Conclusions

Patients who develop DIC with the fibrinolytic phenotype during the early stage of trauma exhibit consumption coagulopathy associated with increased fibrin(ogen)olysis and lower levels of antithrombin. The same is true in patients with ACOTS. The JAAM DIC score can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with coagulopathy of trauma.     

Comparison of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring system, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score method for predicting the outcomes of intensive care unit trauma patients

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method to predict group mortality for intensive care unit (ICU) trauma patients.

Methods

The medical records of 706 consecutive major trauma patients admitted to the ICU of Samsung Changwon Hospital from May 2006 to April 2010 were retrospectively examined. The SOFA and the APACHE II scores were calculated based on data from the first 24 hours of ICU admission, and the TRISS was calculated using initial laboratory data from the emergency department and operative data. The probability of death was calculated for each patient based on the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and TRISS equations. The ability to predict group mortality for the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and TRISS method was assessed by using 2-by-2 decision matrices and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and calibration analysis.

Results

In 2-by-2 decision matrices with a decision criterion of 0.5, the sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies were 74.1%, 97.1%, and 92.4%, respectively, for the SOFA score; 58.5%, 99.6%, and 91.1%, respectively, for the APACHE II scoring system; and 52.4%, 94.8%, and 86.0%, respectively, for the TRISS method. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the areas under the curve for the SOFA score, APACHE II scoring system, and TRISS method were 0.953, 0.950, and 0.922, respectively.

Conclusion

The results from the present study showed that the SOFA score was not different from APACHE II scoring system and TRISS in predicting the outcomes for ICU trauma patients. However, the method for calculating SOFA scores is easier and simpler than APACHE II and TRISS.     

脓毒症心肌损伤患者的预后影响因素分析

目的探讨影响脓毒症心肌损伤患者预后的相关危险因素。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2018年12月首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院收治的147例脓毒症心肌损伤患者的病例资料,研究终点为患者28 d死亡,按照预后将患者分为生存组和死亡组,采用多元Logistic回归分析法分析两组患者的临床资料,分析影响患者死亡预后的危险因素。结果147例患者中,其中66例死亡,死亡率为44.89%,单因素分析显示,与生存组相比,死亡组(n=66,44.89%)患者高血压比率高,以肺部感染为感染源比率高,血糖、血肌酐、血清钾离子水平高,7 d累积液体正平衡多,急性生理与慢性健康评分II(APACHEⅡ评分)、全身感染相关性序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA评分)高,使用机械通气、血管活性药物、合并急性肾损伤比率大;而生存组24 h乳酸清除率高于死亡组。根据单因素分析筛选指标,进行多元logistic回归分析显示,24 h乳酸清除率(OR=0.348,95%CI:0.155~0.786,P=0.011)、APACHE II评分(OR=2.037,95%CI:1.970~2.109,P=0.028)、肺部感染(OR=4.556,95%CI:1.527~13.593,P=0.007)、合并急性肾损伤(OR=21.443,95%CI:4.119~43.879,P<0.01)是影响脓毒症心肌损伤患者预后的独立危险因素。结论脓毒症心肌损伤患者病死率高,24 h乳酸清除率、APACHEⅡ评分、肺部感染和合并急性肾损伤是影响其预后的危险因素。