Novel method of knotless vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: feasibility study and early outcomes in 30 patients using the interlocked barbed unidirectional V-LOC180 suture

Purpose:

Our purpose was to describe the safety and feasibility of a running posterior reconstruction (PR) integrated with continuous vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) using a novel self-cinching unidirectional barbed suture in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Methods:

Between March and October 2010, 30 consecutive patients with organ-confined prostate cancer underwent RARP by an experienced single surgeon (KCZ). Upon completion of radical prostatectomy, urinary reconstruction was carried out using 2 knotless, interlocked 6-inches 3-0 V-Loc-180 suture. The left tail of the suture was initially used for PR (starting at 5-o’clock and ran to re-approximate the retrotrigonal layer to the rectourethralis) followed by left-sided VUA (from 6- to 12-o’clock), while the right-sided suture completed the right-sided VUA. Assurance of watertight closure with an intraoperative 300 cc saline visual cystogram was performed in all cases prior to case completion. Perioperative outcomes and 30-day complications were recorded.

Results:

All anastamoses were performed without assistance and without knot tying. Median time for nurse setup and urinary reconstruction was 40 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 25–60) and 14.6 min (IQR 10–18), respectively. The need to readjust suture tension or place Lapra-Ty clips (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) to establish watertight closure was observed in 2 cases (7%). No patient had clinical urinary leak and there was no urinary retention after catheter removal on mean postoperative day 5 (IQR 4–6).

Conclusions:

Our clinical experience with a novel technique using the interlocked V-Loc suture during RARP for both PR and anastomosis appears to be safe and efficient. Using the barbed suture prevents slippage and eliminates the need for bedside assistance to maintain suture tension or knot tying, thus assuring watertight tissue closure.     

Extracorporeal Versus Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy

Background:

During laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, the anastomosis can be created intra- or extracorporeally. This study aimed to determine whether a difference exists in short-term outcomes between these techniques.

Methods:

Prospectively collected data of 80 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomies since 2004 were reviewed retrospectively. An intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in 23 patients, an extracorporeal anastomosis in 57.

Results:

There were no significant differences in median length of stay (4 days), number of removed lymph nodes, estimated blood loss, operative time (190 minutes intracorporeal vs. 180 minutes) and postoperative ileus (22% intracorporeal vs. 16%). The incision length was significantly shorter in the intracorporeal group (4cm vs. 5cm; P=0.004). Complications related to the anastomosis including twisting of the mesentery (n=2), anastomotic volvulus (n=1), or leak (n=1) occurred in 4 patients in the extracorporeal group compared with one minor anastomotic leak in the intracorporeal group. Major complication rates were similar between the 2 groups (4.3% intracorporeal vs. 5.3% extracorporeal).

Conclusion:

The type of anastomosis does not influence short-term outcomes after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. An intracorporeal anastomosis results in shorter incision length and may decrease wound-related complications.     

Robotic radical prostatectomy at a teaching community hospital: outcomes and safety

Objectives:

This study describes the early experience of robotic prostatectomy exclusively at a teaching community hospital.

Methods:

This is a retrospective report of 153 consecutive patients on whom 4 physicians were the operating surgeon.

Results:

The average hospital stay was 1.5 days, the mean operative time was 175 minutes, and the estimated operative blood loss was <300mL. The perioperative complication rate was 7.8% (12/153). The prostate-specific antigen failure rate was 2% (2/114). Urinary continence was maintained in 98% of patients 9 months after surgery. Postoperative Gleason scores differed significantly from preoperative biopsy results (P<0.001). Pathological records reported positive margins in 35% (54/153) of specimens. T3 tumors had positive margins more than twice as often as T2 tumors (P<0.002). Surgeon experience correlated with shorter operative times (P<0.001), but not with positive margins. Increasing body mass index was associated with increased operating time (P=0.001).

Conclusions:

Robotic prostatectomy appears to be a safe and successful option for prostate cancer treatment in a teaching community hospital.     

Modifications to Facilitate Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Post Kidney Transplant

Introduction:

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal failure. With advances in immunosuppression, the short-term and long-term outcome has improved significantly. Subsequently, urologists are encountering more transplant recipients with genitourinary malignancies, and therefore urologists are becoming increasingly compelled to offer curative treatment options.

Materials and Methods:

We present modifications to facilitate E-RARP in these patients that include modified trocar arrangement, delayed bladder neck transection, utilizing the robotic Hem-o-lok applier, and posterior reconstruction of the anastomosis using a barbed V-loc suture. A 68-year-old male with a history of polycystic kidney disease, end-stage renal failure, and an allograft renal transplantation in the right iliac fossa, presented with T1c, Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer. He had a preoperative PSA of 6.93ng/mL, ASA score of 3, and a BMI of 26kg/m². Follow-up for metastasis (MRI and bone scan) was negative. E-RARP was performed via the extraperitoneal approach using a 5-port 2-arm approach at an insufflation pressure of 10mm Hg.

Results:

The radical prostatectomy was successfully performed. Ureterovesical anastomosis was completed, and total console time was 130 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 125mL. Final pathology was T2bNx, Gleason 3+4 with negative surgical margins. The patient was discharged with no change in serum creatinine or GFR. The catheter was removed on POD 10 with no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications.

Conclusion:

E-RARP in the carefully selected renal allograft recipient is feasible and accomplished safely with technical modifications to avoid injuring the renal allograft, transplanted ureter, and ureteroneocystostomy.     

Cardiovascular Surgery Residency Program: Training Coronary Anastomosis Using the Arroyo Simulator and UNIFESP Models

OBJECTIVE

Engage the UNIFESP Cardiovascular Surgery residents in coronary anastomosis, assess their skills and certify results, using the Arroyo Anastomosis Simulator and UNIFESP surgical models.

METHODS

First to 6^th year residents attended a weekly program of technical training in coronary anastomosis, using 4 simulation models: 1. Arroyo simulator; 2. Dummy with a plastic heart; 3. Dummy with a bovine heart; and 4. Dummy with a beating pig heart. The assessment test was comprised of 10 items, using a scale from 1 to 5 points in each of them, creating a global score of 50 points maximum.

RESULTS

The technical performance of the candidate showed improvement in all items, especially manual skill and technical progress, critical sense of the work performed, confidence in the procedure and reduction of the time needed to perform the anastomosis after 12 weeks practice. In response to the multiplicity of factors that currently influence the cardiovascular surgeon training, there have been combined efforts to reform the practices of surgical medical training.

CONCLUSION

1 - The four models of simulators offer a considerable contribution to the field of cardiovascular surgery, improving the skill and dexterity of the surgeon in training. 2 - Residents have shown interest in training and cooperate in the development of innovative procedures for surgical medical training in the art.     

Robot-Assisted Versus Open Liver Resection in the Right Posterior Section

Background:

Open liver resection is the current standard of care for lesions in the right posterior liver section. The objective of this study was to determine the safety of robot-assisted liver resection for lesions located in segments 6 and 7 in comparison with open surgery.

Methods:

Demographics, comorbidities, clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical treatments, and outcomes from patients who underwent open and robot-assisted liver resection at 2 centers for lesions in the right posterior section between January 2007 and June 2012 were reviewed. A 1:3 matched analysis was performed by individually matching patients in the robotic cohort to patients in the open cohort on the basis of demographics, comorbidities, performance status, tumor stage, and location.

Results:

Matched patients undergoing robotic and open liver resections displayed no significant differences in postoperative outcomes as measured by blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay, overall complication rate (15.8% vs 13%), R0 negative margin rate, and mortality. Patients undergoing robotic liver surgery had significantly longer operative time (mean, 303 vs 233 minutes) and inflow occlusion time (mean, 75 vs 29 minutes) compared with their open counterparts.

Conclusions:

Robotic and open liver resections in the right posterior section display similar safety and feasibility.     

Impact of Robotic Fellowship Experience on Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Background

We analyzed differences in patient selection and perioperative outcomes between robotic-fellowship trained and non-fellowship trained surgeons in their initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Methods

Data through surgeon case 10 was analyzed. Forty patients were identified from two fellowship trained surgeons (n = 20) and two non-fellowship trained surgeons (n = 20).

Results

Fellowship trained surgeons performed surgery on masses of higher nephrometry score (8.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.007) and more posterior location (60 vs. 25%, p = 0.03). Retroperitoneal approach was more common (50 vs. 0%, p = 0.0003). Fellowship trained surgeons trended toward shorter warm ischemia time (25.5 vs. 31.0 min, p = 0.08). There was no significant difference in perioperative complications (35 vs. 35%, p = 0.45) or final positive margin rates (0 vs. 15%, p = 0.23).

Conclusion

Fellowship experience may allow for treating more challenging and posterior tumors in initial practice and significantly more comfort performing retroperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.Key Words: Partial nephrectomy, Robotics, Laparoscopic surgeries, Fellowship training, Perioperative period     

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Residents and Experienced Surgeons

Background:

Laparoscopic appendectomy is widely performed by surgical residents, but its changing indications and outcomes have been poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to examine whether a difference exists in indications and outcomes between laparoscopic appendectomies performed by residents and those performed by experienced surgeons.

Methods:

Between 1999 and 2007, 218 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed and recorded. Data were analyzed to compare operations performed by residents with those by experienced surgeons in terms of indications for surgery and severity of disease. Moreover, laparoscopic appendectomies were thoroughly compared regarding outcomes and complications.

Results:

The residents had fewer conversions with laparoscopic appendectomy (8% vs 17%, P=0.04), and similar complication rates (12% vs 13%, P=0.16), compared with experienced surgeons. The median operating time was also comparable (67 minutes vs 60 minutes, P=0.23). However, patients operated on by residents had more emergencies (86% vs 70%, P=0.009), included more foreigners (27% vs 15%, P=0.03), and had intermediate to severe diseases, (81 vs 52%, P<0.001) than patients did operated on by experienced surgeons.

Conclusions:

Surgical residents performed more emergency laparoscopic appendectomies on foreign patients suffering from intermediate to severe diseases compared with experienced surgeons, with comparable surgical outcomes and lower conversion rates.     

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy after Fellowship Training

Background and Objectives:

Experienced surgeons at select high-volume centers have reported favorable outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in their contemporary experience. However, it is unclear whether recently fellowship-trained surgeons can replicate such outcomes. We evaluated LPNs performed by 3 surgeons in their initial years of independent practice following laparoscopic fellowship training.

Methods:

Prospectively maintained databases were queried for LPNs performed during the first 3.5 years of practice. Intraoperative parameters, oncological efficacy, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results:

Of 138 total LPNs (76 left, 62 right), the mean patient age was 57 years, mean tumor size was 2.52cm, and mean depth of invasion was 1.68cm. Mean OR time was 252 minutes, mean warm ischemia time (WIT) was 26 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 202 mL. Complications occurred in 7 patients (5%), and conversions occurred in 9 patients (7%). Comparison of the first 15 vs. the last 15 cases demonstrated a significant reduction in mean OR time (204 min vs. 253 min, P=0.007), and mean WIT (24 min vs. 32 min, P<0.001). No significant change was demonstrated for tumor size (2.6 cm vs. 2.4 cm, P=0.390) or EBL (226 mL vs. 220 mL, P=0.922).

Conclusion:

Newly fellowship-trained surgeons performing LPN achieve initial outcomes comparable to those reported by highly experienced surgeons. Further experience reduced total operative and warm ischemia times.     

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach

Objectives:

To evaluate our case of robot-assisted ureterolysis (RU), describe our surgical technique, and review the literature on minimally invasive ureterolysis.

Methods:

One patient managed with robot-assisted ureterolysis for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis was identified. The chart was analyzed for demographics, operative parameters, and immediate postoperative outcome. The surgical technique was assessed and modified. Lastly, a review of the published literature on ureterolysis managed with minimally invasive surgery was performed.

Results:

One patient underwent robot-assisted ureterolysis at our institution in 2 separate settings. Operative time (OR) decreased from 279 minutes to 191 minutes. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was less than 50mL. The patient has been free of symptoms and both renal units are unobstructed. According to the published literature, 302 renal units underwent successful laparoscopic ureterolysis (LU), and 6 renal units underwent RU. There were 9 open conversions (all in LU). Mean OR in LU was 248 minutes for unilateral and 386 minutes for bilateral cases. In RU, mean OR was 220 minutes for unilateral and 390 minutes for bilateral cases. EBL averaged 200mL in LU and 30 mL in RU.

Conclusions:

Our data reveal that robot-assisted ureterolysis is safe and feasible. Published data demonstrate the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.     

Towards a Better Laparoscopic Knot: Using Knot Quality Scores to Evaluate Three Laparoscopic Knot-Tying Techniques

Objective:

In the past, knot-tying techniques have been evaluated and compared, but there has been a scarcity of objective scoring systems in these comparison studies. Using an objective scoring system, we aimed to compare 3 types of knots: intracorporeal flat-square knots, intracorporeal slip-square knots, and extracorporeal square-knots for their Knot Quality Scores (KQS) and their rates of slippage.

Materials and Methods:

Three surgeons tied 100 knots in the 3 knot categories. The knots tied were evenly distributed amongst the 3 surgeons with each surgeon contributing at least 30 knots. These knots were tied in a nonrandomized fashion. Forces were measured using a tensiometer and an objective scoring system, the Knot Quality Score (KQS), which is used to compare the knot''s strength and rates of slippage.

Results:

Median KQS scores of the 3 groups were not all the same. The median KQS and variance for the extracorporeal square knot group was 0.32 and 0.0079, respectively. For the intracorporeal slip-square knot group, the median KQS and variance was 0.28 and 0.00017, respectively. Lastly, for the intracorporeal flat-square knot group, the median KQS and variance was 0.33 and 0.0075, respectively. Follow-up analysis revealed that the KQS medians (0.32 versus 0.28) of the extracorporeal square-knots and intracorporeal slip-square knot groups were significantly different (P<0.0001). The medians of the intracorporeal slip-knot and intracorporeal flat-square knot groups (0.28 versus 0.33) were also statistically significantly different (P<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in KQS scores between extracorporeal square-knots and intracorporeal flat-square knots.

Conclusion:

Extracorporeal square-knots and intracorporeal flat-square knots can tolerate better distraction forces and thus have higher median KQS scores compared with intracorporeal slip-square knots.     

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity�Ca Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Gastrojejunal Anastomosis Techniques

Objectives:

We present a randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass comparing 2 techniques of gastrojejunostomy in patients with morbid obesity.

Methods:

Eighty consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass between September 2005 and August 2006. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups by the use of sealed envelopes. In group A, the gastrojejunal anastomosis was performed with a 21-mm circular-stapler, and in group B, this anastomosis was performed with a 45-mm linear-stapler. The rest of the procedure was identical in both groups. Variables evaluated were complications involving the gastrojejunostomy, operative time, length of stay, and percentage of excess weight loss.

Results:

Both groups were similar in age and body mass index. No patients experienced leakage or gastrojejunal anastomosis fistula, but group A patients had a more frequent stricture rate (P<0.05). Operative time and hospital stay were comparable in both groups (P>0.05). Percentage excess weight loss at one year following surgery was satisfactory in both groups, without a statistically significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusion:

Gastrojejunal anastomosis does not seem to be a critical factor in excess weight loss for morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass. The 2 techniques used in this experience are safe and effective; however, the 45-mm liner-stapler is preferable because it has a lower stricture rate.     

Port site and peritoneal metastases after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Port site metastasis after minimally invasive urologic surgery is a rare event despite the widespread utility of laparoscopic techniques in the management of urologic malignancies. Herein, we report a case of port site metastasis after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A currently 77-year-old male patient, who was diagnosed with cT2c, Gleason 7 (4 + 3) prostate adenocarcinoma in our clinic back in 2009, had undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy elsewhere. Histopathological examination revealed pT3a, Gleason 9 (4 + 5) disease. Lymph nodes were negative, however surgical margins were positive on the right side. PSA recurred after 9 months and maximal androgen blockade was initiated. Despite antiandrogenic manipulations, PSA reached 0.83 ng/ml, 33 months postoperatively. Concurrently, we noticed a palpable anterior abdominal mass which demonstrated metabolic hyperactivity on PET scanning. Percutaneous biopsy of the lesion confirmed the presence of metastatic adenocarcinoma. PSA did not normalize after the complete excision of the metastatic focus. Repeated PET scan revealed multiple implants on the peritoneal surfaces of various organs.

DISCUSSION

Port site and peritoneal metastasis of prostate cancer after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has not been reported so far. This peculiar dissemination pattern is most probably the result of tumor biology and perioperative factors.

CONCLUSION

Although encountered extremely rarely, surgeons should be aware of the possibility of port site and/or peritoneal metastases after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.     

The Role of Stent Placement in Laparoscopic Ureteroureterostomy: Experimental Porcine Model

Objective:

Laparoscopic ureteral surgery is becoming increasingly common; however, advanced laparoscopic skills are required due to the precise suturing involved. Because of the size of the ureter and need for careful mucosal apposition to prevent stricturing, there is less room for error than with larger lumens, as in pyeloplasty. We sought to identify whether the presence of a stent is beneficial or a hindrance in performing ureteroureterostomy both for the novice and more experienced laparoscopist.

Materials and Methods:

Eight ureteroureteral anastomoses were performed on each ureter of a 50 kg female pig for a total of 16 anastomoses. Eight were performed with a stent in place, and 8 were performed without a stent. An equal number with and without a stent were performed by a novice and an experienced laparoscopist. Anastomoses were graded by time to complete and quality of the anastomosis. Quality was graded by the presence and size of defects and patency of the lumen.

Results:

The overall times required for ureteral division and spatulation, initial stitch placement, completion of the anastomosis, and total time for the stented vs. nonstented procedures were 4.3 vs. 2.2 minutes (P=0.05), 4.2 vs. 4.4 minutes (P=0.16), 10.4 vs. 13.5 (P=0.22) minutes, and 18.3 vs. 20.1 minutes (P=0.49), respectively. For stented and nonstented ureters, 3 vs. 5 anastomoses were found to have no or very small gaps, 5 vs. 1 anastomosis were found to have large gaps, and 0 vs. 2 anastomoses were found to have occluded lumens, respectively.

Conclusions:

For both the novice and experienced surgeon, presence of a stent did not affect the overall time to complete a ureteroureteral anastomosis despite the significantly longer time needed to divide and spatulate the ureter. There were no occlusions when the ureteral stent was placed prior to suturing, which may indicate a reduced risk of “back-walling” the ureter.     

Laparoscopic Anterior Resection: New Anastomosis Technique in a Pig Model

Background and Objectives:

Bowel anastomosis after anterior resection is one of the most difficult tasks to perform during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This study aims to evaluate a new feasible and safe intracorporeal anastomosis technique after laparoscopic left-sided colon or rectum resection in a pig model.

Methods:

The technique was evaluated in 5 pigs. The OrVil device (Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts) was inserted into the anus and advanced proximally to the rectum. A 0.5-cm incision was made in the sigmoid colon, and the 2 sutures attached to its delivery tube were cut. After the delivery tube was evacuated through the anus, the tip of the anvil was removed through the perforation. The sigmoid colon was transected just distal to the perforation with an endoscopic linear stapler. The rectosigmoid segment to be resected was removed through the anus with a grasper, and distal transection was performed. A 25-mm circular stapler was inserted and combined with the anvil, and end-to-side intracorporeal anastomosis was then performed.

Results:

We performed the technique in 5 pigs. Anastomosis required an average of 12 minutes. We observed that the proximal and distal donuts were completely removed in all pigs. No anastomotic air leakage was observed in any of the animals.

Conclusion:

This study shows the efficacy and safety of intracorporeal anastomosis with the OrVil device after laparoscopic anterior resection.     

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Previous Prostate Surgery

Background and Objectives:

Our objective is to clarify the effect of previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or open prostatectomy (OP) on surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Methods:

Between August 1, 2009, and March 31, 2013, 380 patients underwent RARP. Of these, 25 patients had undergone surgery for primary bladder outlet obstruction (TURP, 20 patients; OP, 5 patents) (group 1). A match-paired analysis was performed to identify 36 patients without a history of prostate surgery with equivalent clinicopathologic characteristics to serve as a control group (group 2). Patients followed up for 12 months were assessed.

Results:

Both groups were similar with respect to preoperative characteristics, as mean age, body mass index, median prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, clinical stage, the biopsy Gleason score, D''Amico risk, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification score, the International Prostate Symptom Score, continence, and potency status. RARP resulted in longer console and anastomotic time, as well as higher blood loss compared with surgery-naive patients. We noted a greater rate of urinary leakage (pelvic drainage, >4 d) in group 1 (12% vs 2,8%). The anastomotic stricture rate was significantly higher in group 1 (16% vs 2.8%). No difference was found in the pathologic stage, positive surgical margin, and nerve-sparing procedure between the groups. Biochemical recurrence was observed in 12% (group 1) and 11.1% (group 2) of patients, respectively. No significant difference was found in the continence and potency rates.

Conclusions:

RARP after TURP or OP is a challenging but oncologically promising procedure with a longer console and anastomosis time, as well as higher blood loss and higher anastomotic stricture rate.     

Surgical Operative Time Increases the Risk of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Robotic Prostatectomy

Background and Objectives:

To evaluate the effect of operative time on the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Methods:

We reviewed the records of all patients at our institution who underwent RARP by a single surgeon from January 2007 until April 2011. Clinical and pathologic information and VTE incidence were recorded for each patient and analyzed by use of logistic regression to evaluate for association with VTE risk. All patients had mechanical prophylaxis, and beginning in February 2008, a single dose of unfractionated heparin, 5000 U, was administered before surgery.

Results:

A total of 549 consecutive patients were identified, with a median follow-up period of 8 months. During the initial 30 days postoperatively, 10 patients (1.8%) had a VTE (deep venous thrombosis in 7 and pulmonary embolism in 3). The median operative time was 177 minutes (range, 121–360 minutes). An increase in operative time of 30 or 60 minutes was associated with 1.6 and 2.8 times increased VTE risks. A 5-point increase in body mass index and need for blood transfusion were also associated with increased risk of VTEs (odds ratios of 2.0 and 11.8, respectively). Heparin prophylaxis was not associated with a significant VTE risk reduction but also was not associated with a significant increase in estimated blood loss (P = .23) or transfusion rate (P = .37).

Conclusion:

A prolonged operative time increases the risk of symptomatic VTEs after RARP. Future studies are needed to evaluate the best VTE prophylactic approach in patients at risk.     

The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Perioperative Outcomes in Hysterectomy

Background and Objectives:

To estimate the effect of surgeon volume on key perioperative outcomes after all modes of hysterectomy.

Methods:

We performed a review of 1914 hysterectomies performed at a large, academic tertiary-care hospital. Women who underwent abdominal, laparoscopic, vaginal, or robotic hysterectomy for benign non-obstetric indications in 2006, 2009, and 2010 were included.

Results:

Gynecologic surgeons were categorized according their average annual hysterectomy case volume: low volume (<11 cases per year), intermediate volume (11–50 cases per year), and high-volume (>51 cases per year). Taking all modes of hysterectomy together, surgeries performed by high-volume surgeons required a shorter operative time (155.11 minutes vs 199.19–203.35 minutes, P < .001) and resulted in less estimated blood loss compared with low- and intermediate-volume surgeons (161.09 mL vs 205.58–237.96 mL, P < .001). The 3 surgical volume groups did not differ from each other significantly in the conversion to laparotomy, readmission rate, or incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications. These findings were maintained when subgroup analyses were performed by type of hysterectomy, with few exceptions. In the subgroup of vaginal hysterectomies by intermediate-volume surgeons, there were slightly more postoperative complications. There were fewer intraoperative complications in laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons, though not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

Hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons at our institution during the 3-year study period were associated with shorter operative times and less estimated blood loss.     

Construct Validation: Simulation of Thoracoscopic Intrathoracic Anastomosis

Background and Objectives:

We sought to develop a simulation model that accurately replicates the challenges of the thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis. This model is intended to serve as a teaching tool during the introduction to, and development of, the skills required to perform a thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis during an Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Methods:

The simulation model uses porcine tissue placed within an artificial hemithorax and covered with a synthetic skin. The model is draped to simulate a realistic operative setting, and ports are placed in standard surgical fashion. Dissection of the esophagus from the mediastinum is then performed, followed by the creation of an esophagogastric anastomosis. The effectiveness of the training model was evaluated using volunteer general and thoracic surgery residents at varying stages of surgical training. The quality of the anastomoses created were evaluated using both objective and subjective criteria, and successful anastomoses were tested for leaks using hydrostatic pressure.

Results:

Objective evaluation showed that successful completion of the anastomosis task increased with the number of attempts, with 100% of participants successfully completing an anastomosis by the final attempt. The time to completion of a successful anastomosis also improved across successive attempts. Moreover, objective measures also showed improvement over time based on the graded quality of the completed anastomosis.

Conclusion:

As surgical techniques continue to evolve, so must the means by which they are taught. This simulation model shows effectiveness in the training of general and thoracic surgery residents performing thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis during the Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy.     

Short- and Medium-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted and Traditional Laparoscopic Rectal Resection

Background:

Traditional laparoscopic anterior rectal resection (TLAR) has recently been used for rectal cancer, offering good functional results compared with open anterior resection and resulting in a better postoperative early outcome. However, laparoscopic rectal resection can be technically demanding, especially when a total mesorectal excision is required. The aim of this study was to verify whether robot-assisted anterior rectal resection (RLAR) could overcome limitations of the laparoscopic approach.

Methods:

Sixty-six patients with rectal cancer were enrolled in the study. Twenty-nine patients underwent RLAR and 37 TLAR. Groups were matched for age, BMI, sex ratio, ASA status, and TNM stage, and were followed up for a mean time of 12 months.

Results:

Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal resection results in shorter operative time when a total mesorectal excision is performed (165.9±10 vs 210±37 minutes; P<0.05). The conversion rate is significantly lower for RLAR (P<0.05). Postoperative morbidity was comparable between groups. Overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable between groups, even though a trend towards better disease-free survival in the RLAR group was observed.

Conclusion:

RLAR is a safe and feasible procedure that facilitates laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Randomized clinical trials and longer follow-ups are needed to evaluate a possible influence of RLAR on patient survival.