Robotic Surgical Education: a Collaborative Approach to Training Postgraduate Urologists and Endourology Fellows

Objective:

Currently, robotic training for inexperienced, practicing surgeons is primarily done vis-à-vis industry and/or society-sponsored day or weekend courses, with limited proctorship opportunities. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an extended-proctorship program at up to 32 months of follow-up.

Methods:

An extended-proctorship program for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was established at our institution. The curriculum consisted of 3 phases: (1) completing an Intuitive Surgical 2-day robotic training course with company representatives; (2) serving as assistant to a trained proctor on 5 to 6 cases; and (3) performing proctored cases up to 1 year until confidence was achieved. Participants were surveyed and asked to evaluate on a 5-point Likert scale their operative experience in robotics and satisfaction regarding their training

Results:

Nine of 9 participants are currently performing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) independently. Graduates of our program have performed 477 RALP cases. The mean number of cases performed within phase 3 was 20.1 (range, 5 to 40) prior to independent practice. The program received a rating of 4.2/5 for effectiveness in teaching robotic surgery skills.

Conclusion:

Our robotic program, with extended proctoring, has led to an outstanding take-rate for disseminating robotic skills in a metropolitan community.     

Transperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy After Prosthetic Mesh Herniorrhaphy

Background and Objectives:

We report our institutional experience performing transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in patients with prior prosthetic mesh herniorrhaphy to assess the feasibility of this procedure in this patient population.

Methods:

From October 2005 to January 2008, transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies were performed and prospectively recorded. We retrospectively reviewed 309 patients.

Results:

Twenty-seven patients (8.7%) were found to have a history of prior hernia repair with prosthetic mesh placement. The mean age was 55.7, estimated blood loss (EBL) was 228 mL, operative (console) time was 197 minutes, and length of hospital stay (LOS) was 1.62 days. In contrast, patients undergoing RALP with no history of mesh herniorrhaphy had a mean age of 59.3, EBL of 302 mL, console time of 193 minutes, and LOS of 2.2 days. These differences were not statistically significant. The mesh herniorrhaphy cohort had a lower percentage of organ-confined disease, but no difference was seen in margin status, continence, or potency rates after one year.

Conclusions:

Transperitoneal RALP is a feasible option for previously operated on patients with prosthetic mesh herniorrhaphy. Two areas that we identified as critical were the initial step of gaining access for pneumoperitoneum and port placement, and meticulous dissection to expose the mesh, which can be subsequently avoided and left intact. As RALP continues to gain popularity, urologists will continue to exploit the advantages of robotic surgery to perform increasingly challenging cases.     

Impact of Fellowship Training on One-Year Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy

Background and Objectives:

We examined 1-year functional and oncologic outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) from a single surgeon entering practice directly from fellowship training.

Methods:

We prospectively analyzed the first 100 RALPs performed by one fellowship-trained robotic surgeon. Data included resident involvement during the procedure, perioperative data, and surgical complications (scored using the Clavien grading system). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data were captured using the EPIC questionnaire at baseline (prior to surgery) and at 1-year follow-up.

Results:

Eighty-two patients (82%) had hospital stays of 2 days or less without any postoperative complications, urethral catheter removal was within 14 days of surgery, and none required readmission to the hospital. The overall positive margin rate was 21% (19% for patients with T2 disease). Clavien grades 1 through 4 complication rates, respectively, were 4%, 10%, 1%, and 1%. There were no deaths, reoperations, or bladder neck contractures. One patient (1%) required a blood transfusion within the 90-day perioperative period. At 1-year follow-up, 78% of patients reported wearing no pads; 41.3% of patients with baseline and 1-year follow-up data reported having intercourse.

Conclusions:

We provide baseline data pertaining to the morbidity, oncologic efficacy, continence results, and potency outcomes of new surgeons performing RALP.     

Evaluation of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic and Open Pyeloplasty in Children: Single-Surgeon Experience

Introduction

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), the most commonly undertaken paediatric robotic urologic surgery, has not been compared against open pyeloplasty (OPN) by a single surgeon. Here, we describe our experience and outcomes.

Methods

Children undergoing RALP or OPN from 2007 to 2013 were reviewed. Clinical success was defined as resolution of presenting symptoms and improved/stable hydronephrosis on ultrasound.

Results

RALP and OPN cohorts comprised 52 and 40 patients, respectively. RALP patients were significantly older (6.8 vs 1.2 years, p<0.01) and heavier (28.4 vs 8.4 kg, p<0.01). Operative times for RALP were longer (203.3 vs 135.0 min, p<0.01), but decreased significantly with increasing experience (r²=0.42, p<0.01). Seven type-IIIb Clavien–Dindo complications occurred in RALP patients compared with two in OPN cases. There were no differences in postoperative narcotic administration (p=0.92) or duration of stay in hospital (DOSH) (p=0.93). A total of 11/40 (28%) OPN patients required epidural analgesia but none were placed in the RALP cohort. A total of 49/52 (94%) RALP patients and 40/40 OPN cases had successful outcomes. Three RALP patients required revision RALP.

Conclusions

These data show that outcomes for RALP and OPN were comparable. An initial learning curve with RALP is to be expected, but operative times for RALP approached those for OPN. Previously reported benefits of RALP (reduced analgesic requirements, DOSH) were not observed. This difference may have been due to comparison of a heterogeneous cohort. Close evaluation of complications allowed for improved placement of stents in RALP.     

Novel Use of the Capio Urethral Anastomotic Suturing Device: A 50-Case Assessment

Objective

Robotic laparoscopic assisted prostatectomy (RALP) has become the predominant technique for prostatectomy despite significant expense and no robust evidence supporting better cancer control, erectile function, or continence. Several studies have demonstrated lower bladder neck contracture (BNC) rates with RALP, believed to be related to improved visualization and control of the urethrovesical anastomosis. We evaluated the Capio™ radical prostatectomy (RP) suture capturing device for improving anastomotic precision during urethrovesical anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective review on a single-surgeon series of 50 consecutive patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with utilization of the Capio™ RP device at an academic hospital (February 2010 to May 2012). Patient demographics, pathology, and outcomes data including rates of anastomotic leak, BNC, erectile function, and continence were collected.

Results

Mean age of patients at the time of procedure was 60.4 ± 6.43 years. Patients were stratifed by D''Amico criteria into low (14.3%), intermediate (67.4%), and high (18.4%) risk groups. Mean follow-up for all patients was 13.1 ± 7.29 months. No patients were diagnosed with BNC within 90 days after surgery. Two patients (4%) were subsequently diagnosed and treated for BNC, one of whom was asymptomatic prior to diagnosis.

Conclusion

Utilizing the Capio™ RP device during RRP, we were able to achieve a BNC rate equivalent to rates reported for RALP. Use of the Capio™ RP device appears to be a cost-effective method for improving RRP urethrovesical anastomotic results.Key Words: Prostatectomy, Instrumentation, Cost effectiveness     

Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence Rates After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Background and Objectives:

To determine prostate cancer biochemical recurrence rates with respect to surgical margin (SM) status for patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).

Methods:

IRB-approved radical prostatectomy database was queried. Patients were stratified as low, intermediate, and high risk according to D’Amico''s risk classification. Postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values were obtained every 3 mo for the first year, then biannually and annually thereafter. Biochemical recurrence was defined as ≥0.2ng/mL. Patients receiving adjuvant or salvage treatment were included. Positive surgical margin was defined as presence of cancer cells at inked resection margin in the final specimen. Margin presence (negative/positive), margin multiplicity (single/multiple), and margin length (≤3mm focal and >3mm extensive) were noted. Kaplan-Meier curves of biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) as a function of SM were generated. Forward stepwise multivariate Cox regression was performed, with preoperative PSA, Gleason score, pathologic stage, prostate gland weight, and SM as covariates.

Results:

At our institution, 1437 patients underwent RALP (2003-2009). Of these, 1159 had sufficient data and were included in our analysis. Mean follow-up was 16 mo. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant increase in BRFS in low-risk and intermediate-risk groups with negative SM. Overall BRFS at 5 y was 72%. Gleason score, pathologic stage, and SM status were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions:

Negative surgical margins resulted in lower biochemical recurrence rates for low-risk and intermediate-risk groups. Multifocal and longer positive margins were associated with higher biochemical recurrence rates compared with unifocal and shorter positive margins. Documenting biochemical recurrence rates for RALP is important, because this treatment for localized prostate cancer is validated.     

What if the Hand Piece Spring Disassembles During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy?

Background and Objectives:

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is successfully being performed for treating prostate cancer (PCa). However, instrumentation failure associated with robotic procedures represents a unique new problem.

Methods:

We report the successful completion of RALRP in spite of a disassembled hand piece spring during the procedure. A PubMed/Medline search was made concerning robotic malfunction and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to discuss our experience.

Results:

We performed RALRP in a 60-year-old male patient with localized PCa. During the procedure, the spring of the hand piece disassembled, and we were not able to reassemble it. We completed the procedure successfully however without fixing the disassembled hand piece spring. We were able to grasp tissue and needles when we brought our fingers together. The only movement we needed to do was to move fingers apart to release tissue or needles caught by robotic instrument.

Conclusion:

Although malfunction risk related to the da Vinci Surgical System seems to be very low, it might still occur. Sometimes, simple maneuvers may compensate for the failed function as occurred in our case. However, patients should be informed before the operation about the possibility of converting their procedure to laparoscopic or open due to robotic malfunction.     

Nephron-sparing surgery for treatment of reninoma: a rare renin secreting tumor causing secondary hypertension

Main findings

A 25-year-old hypertensive female patient was referred to our institution. Initial workup exams demonstrated a 2.8 cm cortical lower pole tumor in the right kidney. She underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without complications. Histopathologic examination revealed a rare juxtaglomerular cell tumor known as reninoma. After surgery, she recovered uneventfully and all medications were withdrawn.

Case hypothesis

Secondary arterial hypertension is a matter of great interest to urologists and nephrologists. Renovascular hypertension, primary hyperadosteronism and pheocromocytoma are potential diagnosis that must not be forgotten and should be excluded. Although rare, chronic pyelonephritis and renal tumors as rennin-producing tumors, nephroblastoma, hypernephroma, and renal cell carcinoma might also induce hypertension and should be in the diagnostic list of clinicians.

Promising future implications

Approximately 5% of patients with high blood pressure have specific causes and medical investigation may usually identify such patients. Furthermore, these patients can be successfully treated and cured, most times by minimally invasive techniques. This interesting case might expand knowledge of physicians and aid better diagnostic care in future medical practice.     

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Distal Ureteral Surgery

Background:

The use of robotic assistance in adult genitourinary surgery has been successful in many operations, leading surgeons to test its use in other applications as well.

Methods:

Based on our use during prostatectomy, we have applied robotic surgery to complex distal ureteral surgeries since 2004 with successful outcomes.

Results:

A series of 11 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic distal ureteral surgery is presented. These surgeries include distal ureterectomy for ureteral cancer with reimplantation, as well as reimplantation with and without Boari flap or psoas hitch for benign conditions.

Conclusions:

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery can be successfully applied to patients requiring distal ureteral surgery. Maintenance of the principles of open surgery is paramount.     

Nongenitourinary complications associated with robot-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy: A single institution assessment of 1,100 patients over 11 years

Objectives

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) provide similar outcomes in terms of biochemical recurrence, postoperative continence, and erectile function. Little is known about other complications of these procedures. To further address this, we examined patient outcomes at our institution over an 11-year period.

The '2-week wait' rule for referrals for suspected urological cancers--urgent need for refinement of criteria

INTRODUCTION

All NHS-suspected cancers should be seen within 2 weeks of referral and are referred under government guidelines (Health Service Circular 205; HSC 205). This policy will be subject to review in 2009. Review is vital to allow the appropriate detection of malignancy without overburdening the premium clinic slots with the healthy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 170 consecutive patients were referred from January–June 2005. Referral details, patient information, events and time to diagnosis were recorded.

RESULTS

Of these 170 patients, 143 were suitable for analysis. Forty-three patients (30%) were referred with frank haematuria, of whom 30% had bladder cancer. Nine percent of patients (n = 13) had microscopic haematuria none of whom had cancer. A quarter of the patients (n = 35) were referred with suspected testis cancer but none had cancer. Forty-one patients were referred with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation; 18 cancers were detected in this group. Ten men had PSA values greater than 50 ng/ml. Only two cancers were suitable for radical prostatectomy. No cancer was found in patients less than 50 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

A high cancer incidence was found (27.9%), the majority of which was bladder cancer or advanced prostate cancer. Out of the 143 patients, no malignancy was diagnosed in any patient less than 50 years of age, no malignancy was diagnosed in any of the microscopic haematuria group and there was no cancer diagnosed in the group of patients referred with scrotal swellings. We suggest that some guidelines are leading to referral of patients with low cancer risk. When the HSC 205 is revised in 2009, we hope studies such as ours are taken into consideration in order to improve resource utilisation.     

Recommendations by Canadian urologists and radiation oncologists for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer

Objective

Previous work has shown that urologists and radiation oncologists prefer the treatment that they themselves deliver when treating clinically localized prostate cancer. Our objective was to determine whether Canadian radiation oncologists and urologists have similar biases in favour of the treatments that they themselves deliver for localized prostate cancer.

Methods

We developed a survey to poll the beliefs that Canadian radiation oncologists and urologists held toward prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening, survival benefits of treatment, recommendations for treatment of prostate cancer and the likelihood of side effects with each therapy.

Results

Urologists were more likely to recommend routine PSA screening for men up to age 70 (p < 0.001), while radiation oncologists were more likely to recommend PSA screening for men over age 80 (p < 0.04). More urologists felt that there was “definitely” a survival advantage with radical prostatectomy (RP) (60% v. 21%, p < 0.001). More radiation oncologists recommend external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (p < 0.01) or brachytherapy (p < 0.03) to treat low-risk prostate cancer. More urologists than radiation oncologists recommend RP for intermediate-risk patients (98% v. 70%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Most Canadian urologists and radiation oncologists recommend routine PSA screening for men aged 50 to 70. A significant preference was detected among both urologists and radiation oncologists for the treatment that they themselves deliver. While both urologists and radiation oncologists recommend prostatectomy for the treatment of low-risk localized prostate cancer, urologists are significantly less likely to recommend EBRT. Conversely, when patients present with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, radiation oncologists were significantly less likely than urologists to recommend a prostatectomy.     

The Canadian Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Audit Study (CanBas)

Objective

To determine the prevalence, diagnostic patterns and management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in Canadian urology outpatient practice.

Methods

Representative urologists were randomly selected from lists provided by the Canadian and Quebec Urological Associations. Each patient identified with a BPH diagnosis during a typical 2-consecutive-week period during April, May or June 2007 was asked to complete a corresponding International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire. Each day, the participant urologist completed an outpatient log and a detailed programmed chart review to transcribe demographics, investigations and treatments associated with each BPH patient.

Results

Eighty-six urologists were invited to participate. Thirty-eight (44.2%) agreed, and 27 of those (71.1%) submitted evaluable data for the audit. Of the 5616 patients seen in outpatient practice (average 208 per urologist), 4324 (77%) were male. A BPH diagnosis was identified in 19.6% of the men (n = 849; mean age 69.5, standard deviation [SD] 10, yr; age range 40–100 yr; mean duration of symptoms 4.8, SD 4.2, yr; mean IPSS score 12.3, SD 7.4; mean prostate specific antigen [PSA] 3.9, SD 3.9, ng/mL). Twenty-four percent of patients had prostates that were rated as large, 50% as medium and 26% as small. PSA level correlated positively with prostate volume. Twenty-two percent were initial consultations for LUTS and 78% were repeat visits. Diagnostic evaluation tended to follow those examinations and tests recommended by the Canadian BPH guidelines. Treatment choices tended to follow an evidence-based algorithm with respect to treatment choices for men in the various prostate-volume and PSA groups.

Conclusion

This prospective audit indicates that BPH remains a common condition managed by urologists in outpatient practice. Investigations and treatments confirm that Canadian urologists appear to be following Canadian BPH guidelines as well as the most recent evidence from the literature.     

Side docking the robot for robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Background and Objectives:

Low lithotomy position with the robot between the legs for docking is a standard position for robotic radical prostatectomy. Its complications include occasional nerve injury and compartment syndrome. In some patients with conditions that limit hip abduction, this position may be infeasible. We report a docking technique that obviates stirrups and simplifies setup without altering surgical technique.

Methods:

A total of 100 consecutive patients underwent robotic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Fifty patients (group 1) were in the standard lithotomy position, and the remaining 50 patients (group 2) were in slight trendelenburg position with the robot at the side of the bed – “side-docked.” Setup and docking times were recorded and both groups were compared for differences in operative variables.

Results:

Mean setup time for group 2 was 4.7 minutes shorter than for group 1 (p = 0.02). Docking time and other operative variables were statistically similar and not affected by the adoption of side-docking technique. However, overall surgical time was longer due to modifications in other aspects of the technique during the study period.

Conclusion:

Side-docking for robotic radical prostatectomy is associated with small but significant improvement in setup time and can be utilized in patients with limited hip abduction.     

Early symptoms of bone and soft tissue sarcomas: could they be diagnosed earlier?

INTRODUCTION

Delays in diagnosis are common for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma (STS) despite guidance produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. This study set out to identify early symptoms experienced by patients and reasons for delays in making a definitive diagnosis.

METHODS

Retrospective interviews were carried out with 107 patients (66 with an STS and 41 with a bone sarcoma) presenting to a specialist centre. Symptoms were determined prior to definitive diagnosis and the occurrence of patient and doctor delays in reaching specialist care.

RESULTS

The median patient delay was 1 month while the median doctor delay was 3.2 months from first symptoms to diagnosis for all sarcomas. Forty-nine patients with STS (74%) presented initially to their general practitioner with at least one guideline feature to prompt urgent referral. Only 2 patients (4%), however, were referred directly to a sarcoma unit, with 21 (43%) referred to secondary care for investigation. Patients with a lump increasing in size exhibited longer patient delays while doctor delay was shorter for deep lumps. Thirty-six patients with a bone sarcoma (88%) presented initially with symptoms to prompt further investigation. Nevertheless, significant delays (3.9 months) were seen in reaching specialist care. Only 4 patients (10%) were referred directly to a sarcoma unit at first presentation, with 21 (54%) referred for further investigation elsewhere.

CONCLUSIONS

It is evident that awareness and referral of sarcomas remain poor. We suggest specific amendments to current guidelines and clearer referral pathways for patients. Furthermore, the need for robust education strategies is indicated, predominantly among healthcare professionals.     

Prospective evaluation of a novel one-stop testicular clinic

INTRODUCTION

In 2003, the waiting time for routine scrotal assessment approached 6 months in our hospital. The patients'' diagnostic pathway was not uniform and involved several delays between general practitioner, radiologist and urologist. If malignancy was suspected, patients were seen and assessed within 2 weeks. However, it was possible for patients with unsuspected malignancy to have their diagnosis delayed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Funding was provided by the NHS Modernisation Agency''s Action On Urology project. Men who were referred by their general practitioner (GP) with a testicular or scrotal condition would be reviewed in a one-stop joint sonographer and urology nurse specialist clinic provided entirely within the urology department with rapid open access. Data were prospectively collected for 2 years. Source of referral, suspected diagnosis, findings and outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 1017 patients attended the clinic over this period; of these, 203 (4%) were referred under the ‘2-week wait’ criteria. Of patients attending the clinic, 79% were discharged to GP care, 8% were added to the waiting list for a surgical procedure and 20% were referred with ‘testicular lump’. Eleven patients were suspected to have testicular tumour on ultrasound and proceeded to orchidectomy in this period. One patient (0.1%) was found to have an unsuspected seminoma. The waiting time for all scrotal ultrasound examinations has fallen from 22 to 2 weeks. The waiting times for intravenous urography and general ultrasound were also significantly reduced following the introduction of this service (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients passing through this clinic are the ‘worried-well’ with benign scrotal pathology. They can now be seen within 2 weeks regardless of whether their GP suspects testicular tumour. This reduces anxiety in this large group of patients freeing capacity elsewhere in the diagnostic imaging department.     

An audit of orthopaedic referrals via Multi-Professional Triage Teams

INTRODUCTION

Multi-Professional Triage Teams (MPTTs) were created to reduce the caseload of hospital orthopaedic clinics and this prospective study evaluated referrals made to a district general hospital orthopaedic department from a lower limb MPTT clinic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over 9 months, 277 referrals to a lower limb hospital orthopaedic clinic were assessed. The temporal delay to hospital clinic review between patients seen at the MPTT clinic and those referred directly by their general practitioner (GP) was analysed using an ANOVA test. A qualitative assessment of diagnoses given to patients reviewed at the MPTT clinic was performed.

RESULTS

The 132 patients initially reviewed at the MPTT clinic and subsequently referred to a hospital consultant waited significantly longer (140 days compared to 62 days by direct GP referral; P < 0.05) to see an orthopaedic consultant. Over three-quarters of this patient cohort incorrectly identified the healthcare professional conducting their consultation at the MPTT clinic. One-third of cases (31%) had no diagnosis made and 22% were assessed as having an incorrect diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Time delays, patient confusion regarding professional roles and diagnostic indecision are significant problems for patients referred to hospital orthopaedic clinics from MPTT clinics. This risks sub-optimal patient care and may lead to future medicolegal implications.     

Robotic liver resection as a bridge to liver transplantation

Background:

The surgical robotic system is superior to traditional laparoscopy in regards to 3-dimensional images and better instrumentation. Robotic surgery for hepatic resection has not yet been extensively reported. The aim of this article is to report the first known case of liver resection with the use of a robot in France.

Methods:

A 61-year-old male with hepatitis C liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma was referred for surgical treatment. Preoperative clinical evaluation and laboratory data disclosed a Child-Pugh class A5 patient. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a 3.4-cm tumor in segment III. Liver size was normal, and there were not signs of portal hypertension. Five trocars were used.

Results:

Liver transection was achieved with Harmonic scalpel and bipolar forceps without pedicle clamping. Hemostasis of raw surface areas was accomplished with interrupted stitches. Operative time was 180 minutes. Blood loss was minimal, and the patient did not receive transfusion. The recovery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the fifth postoperative day without ascites formation.

Conclusion:

The robotic approach may enable liver resection in patients with cirrhosis. The da Vinci robotic system allowed for technical refinements of laparoscopic liver resection due to 3-dimensional visualization of the operative field and instruments with wrist-type end-effectors.     

Audit of Referral Patterns for Hernia Repair – Are General Practitioners Aware of the Changing Face of Herniorrhaphy?

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to examine referral patterns from general practitioners for groin hernia surgery and to assess their knowledge of services available to their patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to 120 general practitioners (GPs) in the South East Wales region who routinely refer patients for inguinal hernia surgery to the Royal Gwent Healthcare NHS Trust.

RESULTS

A total of 86 questionnaire replies were returned. There was variation in referral patterns between the GPs with the majority (84%) referring their patients for groin hernia repair to either a general surgeon or as an open referral. Only 14% referred directly to a hernia specialist and none regularly referred to a laparoscopic surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Referral patterns for inguinal hernia surgery do not reflect services provided in secondary care. Further education is required so that a patient''s care can be optimised.     

Postoperative haemorrhage following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP)

INTRODUCTION

Intractable haemorrhage after endoscopic surgery, including transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP), is uncommon but a significant and life-threatening problem. The knowledge and technical experience to deal with this complication may not be wide-spread among urologists and trainees. We describe our series of TURPs and PVPs and the incidence of postoperative bleeding requiring intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 437 TURPs and 590 PVPs over 3 years in our institution. We describe the conservative, endoscopic and open prostatic packing techniques used for patients who experienced postoperative bleeding.

RESULTS

Of 437 TURPs, 19 required endoscopic intervention for postoperative bleeding. Of 590 PVPs, two patients were successfully managed endoscopically for delayed haemorrhage at 7 and 13 days post-surgery, respectively. In one TURP and one PVP patient, endoscopic management was insufficient to control postoperative haemorrhage and open exploration and packing of the prostatic cavity was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant bleeding after endoscopic prostatic surgery is still a potentially life-threatening complication. Prophylactic measures have been employed to reduce peri-operative bleeding but persistent bleeding post-endoscopic prostatic surgery should be treated promptly to prevent the risk of rapid deterioration. We demonstrated that the technique of open prostate packing may be life-saving.