The interrupter technique to assess airway responsiveness in children with cystic fibrosis

The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the interrupter technique (Rint) in measuring airway responsiveness in children with cystic fibrosis. Fifty children (aged 6-16 years) with cystic fibrosis performed six Rint measurements followed by three acceptable forced expiratory maneuvers. Each child then inhaled 5 mg of nebulized salbutamol by facemask. After 20 min the Rint and forced expiratory measurements were repeated. In the population as a whole a moderate but significant correlation between inverse Rint and FEV1 values was observed, both before and after inhaled bronchodilator (r=0.71 and 0.72, respectively, P < 0.001). However, when changes in Rint and FEV1 readings following inhaled bronchodilator were examined, no relationship was seen. Indeed, the two methods identified completely different subsets of children as being bronchodilator responsive. These results indicate that although a relationship exists between Rint and FEV1 in the whole population, this is not the case in individual children. Rint and FEV1 reflect different aspects of lung function. It is not appropriate to use Rint as a simple alternative for FEV1 in children with cystic fibrosis when assessing airway responsiveness.     

Effects of respiratory timing and cheek support on resistance measurements, before and after bronchodilation in asthmatic children using the interrupter technique

The interrupter technique (Rint) is a noninvasive method for assessing respiratory resistance. The aims of this study were to assess whether upper airway support affects the measurement of Rint, if inspiratory or expiratory Rint were most reproducible, and which method of assessing Rint correlated best with spirometry results and was the most sensitive for identifying bronchodilator response. Twenty-four asthmatic children with a mean age of 10.3 years (range, 7-16 years) were included in the study. Rint measurements were obtained in inspiration and expiration with cheeks supported and unsupported. Spirometry was then performed. Rint and spirometry measurements were repeated after the inhalation of 600 mcg of salbutamol. The mean Rint supported inspiratory (0.708 KPa/l/sec) and expiratory (0.729 KPa/l/sec) values were significantly higher than the unsupported values (inspiratory, 0.622 KPa/l/sec; expiratory, 0.584 KPa/l/sec), P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively. The reproducibility of Rint was not different whether cheeks were supported or not, or whether the measurements were carried out during inspiration or expiration. Cheek support improved the correlation with all the lung function results, both in inspiratory and expiratory measurements. The best correlations, however, were found for the inspiratory supported Rint results. The most sensitive method to ascertain bronchodilator response (BD) was the inspiratory supported Rint measurement, as 83.3% of children were identified as having a positive response to bronchodilator therapy as defined by a reduction of twice the coefficient of variation of the measurement. In conclusion, cheek support increases Rint but does not impact on reproducibility, though it improves the correlation with spirometric indices. Rint with cheek support on inspiration correlates best with spirometric indices and appears to be the most sensitive measure of response to bronchodilators.     

Interrupter technique versus plethysmography for measurement of respiratory resistance in children with asthma or cystic fibrosis

The purpose of the present study was to compare measurements of respiratory system resistance by the interrupter method (Rrsint) with those of airway resistance by plethysmography (Raw) in nonobstructed children with asthma or cystic fibrosis (ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 sec to vital capacity, FEV(1)/VC >/=80% with a forced expiratory flow rate between 25-75% of forced vital capacity, FEF(25-75) >/=75% of normal values) and in obstructed children with the same diseases (FEV(1)/VC <80% and/or FEF(25-75) <75% of normal values). Eighty-one children (47 asthmatics and 34 suffering from cystic fibrosis) aged 5-18 years (mean 11.2 +/- SD 3.4 years) were included in the study. For the overall group, we observed generally lower values for Raw (4.7 +/- 2. 8 cmH(2)O.L(-).s) than for Rrsint20 (extrapolation of the mouth pressure during occlusion to 40 ms after interruption) (5.6 +/- 1.7 cmH(2)O.L(-1).s) (P < 0.02), or for Rrsint40 (extrapolation of the mouth pressure during occlusion to 60 ms after interruption) (6.6 +/- 2.2 cmH(2)O.L(-1).s) (P < 0.001), but there was no difference between Rrsint20 and Raw in the obstructed subgroup. Moreover, we observed a correlation between the difference (Rrsint20 - Raw) expressed in percentage of predicted values and the degree of obstruction estimated by FEV(1)/VC (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). The differences between the specific resistances (sRrsint20 - sRaw, sRrsint40 - sRaw) were also correlated with the severity of the obstruction (r = 0.65, P < 0.001 and r = 0.57, P < 0.001, respectively). We observed also that the tendency to underestimate resistance by Rrsint in obstructed children was not the same in children with asthma and cystic fibrosis. We conclude that the tendency of Rrsint, as measured with our method, to underestimate airway obstruction appears to increase in proportion to the severity of the airway obstruction.     

Comparison of the forced oscillation technique and the interrupter technique for assessing airway obstruction and its reversibility in children

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) and interrupter technique are particularly attractive for pediatric use as they require only passive cooperation from the patient. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of these methods for detecting airway obstruction and its reversibility in 118 children (3-16 yr) with asthma or chronic nocturnal cough. FOT (R(0) and R(16)) and interruption (Rint) parameters were measured at baseline and after bronchodilator inhalation (n = 94). Rint was significantly lower than R(0), especially in children with high baseline values. Baseline parameters were normalized for height and weight [R(SD)]. In children able to perform forced expiratory maneuvers (n = 93), the best discrimination between those with baseline FEV(1) < 80% or > or = 80% of predicted values was obtained with R(0)(SD). At a specificity of 80%, R(0)(SD) yielded 66% sensitivity, whereas Rint(SD) yielded only 33% sensitivity. Similarly, postbronchodilator changes in R(0)(SD) [DeltaR(0)(SD)] yielded the best discrimination between children with and without significant reversibility in FEV(1). At a specificity of 80%, DeltaR(0)(SD) yielded 67% sensitivity and DeltaRint(SD) yielded 58% sensitivity. In children unable to perform forced expiratory maneuvers (n = 25), FOT, contrary to the interrupter technique, clearly identified a subgroup of young children with high resistance values at baseline, which returned to normal after bronchodilation. We conclude that, in asthmatic children over 3 yr old, FOT measurements provide a more reliable evaluation of bronchial obstruction and its reversibility compared with the interrupter technique, especially in young children with high baseline values.     

Airway resistance and atopy in preschool children with wheeze and cough.

The extent to which the measurement of airways resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) distinguishes preschool children with previous wheeze from those with no respiratory symptoms and helps to classify subjects with persistent cough, was investigated. Rint was measured before and after salbutamol treatment in 82 children with recurrent wheeze, 58 with isolated cough and 48 with no symptoms (control subjects). Their mean age (range) was 3.7 yrs (2-<5 yrs). Median baseline Rint was higher (p<0.0001) in wheezers than in either coughers or control subjects (1.16, 0.94 and 0.88 kPa x L(-1) x s(-1) respectively); coughers did not differ significantly from control subjects (p=0.14). The median ratios of baseline to post-salbutamol measurements (bronchodilator response (BDR)) in the groups differed significantly (1.40, 1.27 and 1.07, p< or =0.01 for all), suggesting that coughers occupy an intermediate position. A BDR ratio of >1.22 had a specificity and sensitivity for wheeze of 80% and 76% respectively. Twenty-eight coughers had a BDR ratio >1.22. Wheezers' immunoglobulin E was inversely related to baseline Rint. It is concluded that measurements of airway resistance by the interrupter technique are useful for classifying preschool children with respiratory symptoms and could be used to monitor the effect of interventions. The relation between atopy and airways resistance suggests that they have separate roles in preschool wheezing. Coughers with a high bronchodilator response could represent "cough-variant" asthma in children who have baseline airway resistance by the interrupter technique measurements similar to control subjects. Whether these children develop classical asthma will only be known at follow-up later in childhood.     

Comparison of maximal midexpiratory flow rate and forced expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity in children

BACKGROUND: The mid-portion of the maximal expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curve is often described by values of the mean forced expired flow as lung volume decreases from 75% to 25% of vital capacity (ie, forced expiratory flow, midexpiratory phase [FEF(25-75)]). It is common practice to report also forced expired flow at 50% of vital capacity (FEF(50)). STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether FEF(50) and FEF(25-75) are highly correlated or whether the difference between them reflects a degree of airways obstruction. Also, we wanted to investigate the correlation between the two in cases of irregularly shaped MEFV curves (ie, "saw-toothing"). DESIGN: Analysis of the correlation between FEF(50) and FEF(25-75) in a single determination. We assessed the relationship between the FEF(50)/FEF(25-75) ratio and the degree of airways obstruction, as reflected by other traditional parameters such as FEV(1), FEV(1)/FVC ratio, and specific airway conductance (SGaw). PATIENTS: There were 1,350 forced expiratory maneuvers performed by children with a broad range of pulmonary abnormalities. RESULTS: FEF(50) correlated with FEF(25-75) as follows: FEF(50) (L/s) = 0.041 + 1.136*FEF(25-75)(L/s); r(2) = 0.956; standard error of the estimate = 0.013; p < 0.0001. The FEF(50)/FEF(25-75) ratio remained stable and did not correlate with FEV(1) (r = 0.12), FEV(1)/FVC ratio (r = 0.11), or SGaw (r = 0.02; difference not significant). The correlation between FEF(25-75) and FEF(50) was similar for both the smooth curve (r = 0.97) and the irregular curve (r = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Although not identical, FEF(25-75) and FEF(50) are highly correlated, and the ratio of the two is fairly constant. Therefore, the practice of reporting both of them is unnecessary. We suggest that it is reasonable to prefer FEF(50).     

Pulmonary function tests in preschool children with cystic fibrosis

Pulmonary function tests have rarely been assessed in preschool children with cystic fibrosis (CF). The objective of this multicenter study was to compare pulmonary function in 39 preschool children with CF (height, 90-130 cm; 16 homozygous Delta F508) and in 79 healthy control children. Functional residual capacity (helium dilution technique) and expiratory interrupter resistance (Rint(exp)) (interrupter technique) were measured. As compared with control children, children with CF had significantly higher Rint(exp), expressed as absolute values and as Z-scores (1.05 +/- 0.36 versus 0.80 +/- 0.20 kPa.L(-1). second, p < 0.0001; and 1.31 +/- 1.72 versus 0.19 +/- 0.97, p < 0.0001), and significantly lower specific expiratory interrupter conductance (1.29 +/- 0.34 versus 1.63 +/- 0.43 kPa(-1). second, p < 0.0001). The effect of the bronchodilator salbutamol on Rint(exp) was not significantly different between children with CF and control children. Rint(exp) Z-scores were significantly higher in children with CF who were exposed to passive smoke (n = 8) (p < 0.03). Children with CF and with a history of respiratory symptoms (n = 31) had significantly higher functional residual capacity Z-scores (p < 0.02) and lower specific expiratory interrupter conductance Z-scores (p < 0.04). Genotype did not influence the data. We conclude that Rint(exp) and functional residual capacity measurements may help to follow young children with CF who are unable to perform reproducible forced expiratory maneuvers.     

Pre/postbronchodilator interrupter resistance values in healthy young children

The interrupter technique estimates flow resistance. It entails occlusion of the airways during tidal breathing while flow and mouth pressure are recorded. This noninvasive technique is easy to use in young children. The aim of the present study was to measure inspiratory and expiratory interrupter resistance (Rint(insp), Rint(exp)) before and after bronchodilator administration in young healthy white children. We designed a multicenter study using a standardized procedure for Rint measurements. Centers in five French cities studied 91 children (48 boys and 43 girls; height, 92 to 129 cm; mean age 5.3 +/- 1.4 years). Mean values were not significantly different for Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) (0.78 +/- 0.21 versus 0.78 +/- 0.20 KPa x L(-1) x second). However, the difference between Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) decreased significantly with age and being positive before 5 years and negative later on (p < 0.02). Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) decreased significantly with height (Rint(insp) [KPa x L(-1) x second] = 2.289 - 1.37. 10(-2) x H [cm], Rint(exp) [KPa. L(-1) x second] = 2.021 - 1.12.10(-2) x H [cm]; p < 0.001). Bronchodilator (salbutamol) administration significantly decreased Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) (p < 0.001). Bronchodilator-induced changes (% of predicted values) in mean Rint(insp) and mean Rint(exp) were -15% (95% confidence interval, -46 to +15%) and -12% (95% confidence interval, -46 to +22%), respectively. Sex did not affect pre- or postbronchodilator values. Data from the present study may prove useful for testing lung function in young children with respiratory disorders who failed to cooperate with forced expiratory maneuvers.     

Interrupter resistance in preschool children: measurement characteristics and reference values

There is a need for quick, reliable, and noninvasive lung function tests to assess airway obstruction in preschool children both for pediatric pulmonary care as well as for research purposes. We studied feasibility, reproducibility, and validity of measurements of the respiratory system using the interrupter technique (interrupter resistance [Rint]) and obtained reference values in children from a general population, 2 to 7 yr of age. Accuracy was studied by comparisons of Rint with plethysmographic airway resistance (Raw) in 20 patients (7 to 14 yr) with mild to severe chronic airways obstruction and was satisfactory in patients with FEV(1) > 60% predicted. The technique proved sensitive enough to detect changes in airway caliber within a small group of 12 children who developed mild respiratory tract infections. Among children from a general population, subgroups with mild respiratory symptoms or mild respiratory disease had higher mean Rint values. Airway obstruction was better detected using expiratory rather than inspiratory interruptions, both programmed at peak tidal ventilatory flow. Reproducibility within subjects was satisfactory (intraclass correlation 0.82 and 0.79). The same applied to interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation 0.98). The interrupter technique proves to be a reliable and practical test of airway function, suitable for clinical and epidemiologic studies in preschool children.     

Spirometric pulmonary function in 3- to 5-year-old children

Forced expiratory maneuvers are routinely used in children, 6 years of age and older for the diagnosis and follow-up of respiratory diseases. Our objective was to establish normative data for an extensive number of parameters measured during forced spirometry in healthy 3- to 5-year-old children. Children aged between 3 and 5 years were tested in 11 daycare centers. Usual parameters, including FEV1, FVC, PEF, FEF(25-75), FEF25, FEF50, FEF75, and Aex were measured and analyzed in relation to sex, age, height, and weight. In addition, the same analysis was performed for FEV0.5 and FEV0.75. One hundred sixty-four children were recruited for testing including 87 girls and 77 boys. Thirty-five were 3 years old, 63 were 4 years old, and 66 were 5 years old. Overall, 143 children (87%) accepted to perform the test and 128 children (78%) were able to perform at least two technically acceptable expiratory maneuvers. Analyses using different regression models showed that height was the best predictor for every parameter. In conclusion, the present study confirms that most healthy 3-5 years old children can perform valid forced expiratory maneuvers. In agreement with other studies, we found that height is the most important single predictor of various parameters measured on forced spirometry. The present study is the first to establish normative values for FEV0.75, as well as to demonstrate that Aex can be easily performed in the majority of children aged 3-5 years. These are likely important parameters of lung function in this age range.     

Airway challenge testing - accuracy of the interrupter technique

According to national and international recommendations the bronchial sensitivity should be determined based on the decrease of the FEV1 by 20 % (FEV1 - 20) or the increase of the airway resistance by means of body plethysmography by 100 % (Raw + 100). Measurement of airway resistance by interrupter technique (Rint) is a simple method and needs no active cooperation of the patient, but is not recommended in airway challenge testing. We investigated the role of the increase of Rint by 100 % (Rint + 100) compared to Raw + 100 and FEV1 - 20 during carbachol airway challenge testing by means of dosimetry. We examined 123 patients with following symptoms: 85 x coughing, 31 x coughing and dyspnea, 7 x medical opinion. Significant correlations between Rint and Raw were found before and after the challenge tests (Rint before/after 0,3 +/- 0,13/0,36 +/- 0,25 kPa*s/l; Raw before/after 0,24 +/- 0,09/0,50 +/- 0,41 kPa*s/l; r = 0,504/0,672; p < 0,001 [Pearson]). The median values of Rint and Raw were significantly different (p < 0,001 [Wilcoxon]). Moreover Rint systematically overestimated airway resistance in the normal range and underestimated the increase of airway resistance during challenge testing (r = 0,783; p < 0,001 [Pearson]). In 58 patients an increased airway responsiveness was found. In 21 oft these patients there was no increase of Rint above the initial value. Sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value in % to the detection of airway hyperresponsiveness were in Rint + 100 9/95/63/54, in FEV1 - 20 61/100/100/66 and in Raw + 100 98/100/100/98. In conclusion we found significant correlations between Rint and Raw, but the median values were systematically and significantly different. Rint + 100 had a low sensitivity to detect airway hyperresponsiveness and is not comparable with FEV1 - 20 or Raw + 100.     

The role of computer games in measuring spirometry in healthy and "asthmatic" preschool children

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To explore the role of respiratory interactive computer games in teaching spirometry to preschool children, and to examine whether the spirometry data achieved are compatible with acceptable criteria for adults and with published data for healthy preschool children, and whether spirometry at this age can assess airway obstruction. DESIGN: Feasibility study. SETTINGS: Community kindergartens around Israel and a tertiary pediatric pulmonary clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy and asthmatic preschool children (age range, 2.0 to 6.5 years). INTERVENTION: Multi-target interactive spirometry games including three targets: full inspiration before expiration, instant forced expiration, and long expiration to residual volume. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: One hundred nine healthy and 157 asthmatic children succeeded in performing adequate spirometry using a multi-target interactive spirometry game. American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society spirometry criteria for adults for the start of the test, and repeatability were met. Expiration time increased with age (1.3 +/- 0.3 s at 3 years to 1.9 +/- 0.3 s at 6 years [+/- SD], p < 0.05). FVC and flow rates increased with age, while FEV1/FVC decreased. Healthy children had FVC and FEV1 values similar to those of previous preschool studies, but flows were significantly higher (> 1.5 SD for forced expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity [FEF50] and forced expiratory flow at 75% of vital capacity [FEF75], p < 0.005). The descending part of the flow/volume curve was convex in 2.5- to 3.5-year-old patients, resembling that of infants, while in 5- to 6-year-old patients, there was linear decay. Asthma severity by Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines correlated with longer expiration time (1.7 +/- 0.4 s; p < 0.03) and lower FEF50 (32 to 63%; p < 0.001) compared to healthy children. Bronchodilators improved FEV1 by 10 to 13% and FEF50 by 38 to 56% of baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Interactive respiratory games can facilitate spirometry in very young children, yielding results that conform to most of the ATS criteria established for adults and published data for healthy preschool children. Spirometric indexes correlated with degree of asthma severity.     

The opening interrupter technique for respiratory resistance measurements in children

Background and objective: The interrupter resistance (Rint) can be calculated from various estimates of alveolar pressure based on mouth pressure during occlusion. We compared Rint, as measured by the opening interrupter technique (Rint1), and the linear back‐extrapolation method (Rint2), with the ‘gold standard’ airway resistance measured by plethysmography (Raw). Methods: The study included 32 asthmatic children and 11 children with cystic fibrosis, aged 5 to 18 years, who were categorized into non‐obstructed (NObs) (n = 27) and obstructed (Obs) (n = 16) groups. Spirometry and the three different resistance measurements were performed on all children. Rint1 and Raw were assessed after a bronchodilator (BD) test in 16 and nine children, respectively, in the Obs group. Results: Raw (0.48 ± 0.20 kPa.s/L) was lower than Rint1 (1.04 ± 0.34 kPa.s/L) and Rint2 (0.63 ± 0.18 kPa.s/L) (P < 0.001). Raw, but neither Rint1 nor Rint2, was significantly higher in the Obs group than in the NObs group (0.57 ± 0.23 vs 0.42 ± 0.16 kPa.s/L, P < 0.05). The differences Rint1‐Raw and Rint2‐Raw were correlated with FEV₁/VC (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001), and Rint1‐Raw was correlated with height (P < 0.001). After BD significant changes in Rint1 and Raw were observed in 5/9 and 7/9 children, respectively. Conclusions: Rint2, as well as Rint1, may be underestimated in the most Obs children and may therefore fail to detect severe obstruction. Rint1 is likely to include a non‐negligible contribution from the tissue component, especially in the youngest children. Although not different between Obs and NObs children at baseline, Rint1 did detect bronchodilation in some Obs children.     

Applicability of interrupter resistance measurements for evaluation of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children

The interrupter technique is a noninvasive method for measuring air-flow resistance during tidal breathing. This method requires minimal cooperation, and is therefore promising for use in uncooperative children. The aim of this study was to evaluate applicability interrupter resistance (Rint) measurements in the assessment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Fifty children aged 5-12 years with mild to moderate asthma were tested by exercise challenge, consisting of free outdoor running for 6 min at 80-90% of maximal predicted heart rate for age. Rint, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were measured before and 10 min after exercise. EIB was defined as a fall of 10% or more in FEV1 after exercise. The repeatability of Rint was assessed, and its response to exercise challenge was compared with current standardized methods. The mean intermeasurement coefficient of variation was 4.6% (SD, +/- 3.0%), and the repeatability coefficient was 0.056 kPa/l/sec. Eighteen (36%) of the 50 children had EIB after exercise challenge test. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.953 (95% confidence interval, 0.853-0.992; P < 0.001), and the optimal Rint cutoff value was 15.2%, producing a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 96.9%. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.1% and 93.9%, respectively. The kappa value between FEV1 and Rint was 0.83. The repeatability of Rint measurements was good, and the results of exercise challenge tests using Rint measurements have excellent agreement with the current standardized methods to detect EIB. Considering that only minimal comprehension and coordination are needed without forced breathing technique, the Rint measurement can provide a useful alternative for assessment of EIB in children unable to perform reliable spirometry.     

Comparative analysis of the bronchodilator response measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS), spirometry and body plethysmography in asthmatic children.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is common among young children. The assessment of respiratory resistance by the impulse oscillometry system (IOS), based on the superimposition of respiratory flow by short-time impulses, requires no patient active collaboration. AIM: We evaluated the baseline repeatability and bronchodilator response of IOS indices in preschool children, their correlation with spirometry and whole body plethysmography, and differences between atopic and nonatopic children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three asthmatic children (3-6 yrs.) underwent IOS measurement (R5rs, R20rs and X5rs) by triplicate at the baseline, after placebo and after salbutamol inhalation. Spirometry (FEV1) and whole body plethysmography (sRaw) were made at the baseline and after salbutamol. Baseline within-test (coefficient of variation: CV%) and between-test repeatability (baseline-placebo) were addressed. Bronchodilator response was evaluated by the SD index (change in multiples of the between-test repeatability). RESULTS: Baseline repeatability for R5rs was 4.1%. Its values decreased by 2SD after salbutamol inhalation, and correlated with FEV1 and sRaw at both, baseline (r=-0.51 and r=0.49) and post-salbutamol (r=-0.63 and r=0.54). A trend towards correlation between salbutamol-induced changes in R5rs and in sRaw (r=0.33) was observed. Atopic and non-atopic children showed no differences in lung function. CONCLUSION: IOS was well accepted by young asthmatic children and provided reproducible and sensitive indices of lung function. Resistance values obtained by IOS at low frequency (R5rs) were reproducible and correlated with spirometry and plethysmographic values.     

Exercise-induced bronchospasm in children: comparison of FEV1 and FEF25-75% responses

The response of asthmatic children to exercise has usually been evaluated by forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)). We reasoned that other respiratory indexes derived from the forced vital capacity maneuver such as forced expiratory flow between 25-75% of vital capacity (FEF(25-75%)) would add significant information in the evaluation of the relationship between asthma severity and response to exercise. We studied 164 children with intermittent (n = 63), mild persistent (n = 30), moderate persistent (n = 40), and severe persistent asthma (n = 31). Subjects exercised for 6 min on a cycle ergometer at 80% of their maximum heart rate, and spirometry was performed before and 5, 10, and 20 min after exercise. There was good correlation between changes in FEV(1) and FEF(25-75%) after exercise (r = 0.60, P < 0.001 for intermittent asthma and r = 0.80, P < 0.001 for severe persistent asthma). The presence of a fall in both FEV(1) (>/=10%) and in FEF(25-75%) (>/=26%) when compared to a decrease in only one of these two indexes was significantly greater in children with more severe asthma (60.0% for intermittent asthma and 94.4% for severe persistent asthma, P = 0.022). FEF(25-75%) can decrease in response to exercise without changes in FEV(1), mainly in children with mild asthma. In the evaluation of the response to exercise in children with different asthma severities, more than one maximum expiratory flow-volume parameter should be used.     

Measurement of lung function in awake 2–4-year-old asthmatic children during methacholine challenge and acute asthma: A comparison of the impulse oscillation technique,the interrupter technique,and transcutaneous measurement of oxygen versus whole-body plethysmography

This study evaluated three techniques for testing of lung function in young awake children. We compared measurements by the forced or impulse oscillation technique (IOS), the interrupter technique (IT), and transcutaneous measurements of oxygen (tcPO₂) with concomitant measurements of specific airway resistance (sRaw) during methacholine challenge in 20 stable asthmatic children, 2–4 years old. Measurements were performed with all techniques after each dose of methacholine and after inhalation of a bronchodilator. Measurements were carried out during tidal breathing using a face-mask with a built-in mouthpiece. The ranking of sensitivity was as follows: sRaw > IOS, respiratory reactance at 5 Hz (Xrs5) > tcPO₂ > interrupter resistance (Rint) > IOS, respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5). The sensitivity of sRaw and Xrs5 was not significantly different, but both were significantly more sensitive than Rint and Rrs5; the sensitivity of tcPO₂, Rint, and Rrs5 was not significantly different. Measurements in eight of the subjects performed during an episode of acute asthma yielded comparable results in regard to the sensitivity of the techniques. Measurements improved significantly after bronchodilator administration; however, the response to bronchodilator tended to be less during acute asthma and was best demonstrated by a deterioration of tcPO₂. All the evaluated techniques reliably reflect short-term changes in respiratory function and can provide clinically useful estimates of airway function. The techniques are non-invasive, are not dependent on the active co-operation or sedation of the subjects, and therefore are well suited for routine use in young children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996; 21:290–300. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Measurement of airway resistance using the interrupter technique in preschool children in the ambulatory setting.

This study describes the feasibility, repeatability, and interrater reliability of the measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in children 2-5 yrs of age, and examines whether reversibility to bronchodilator can be demonstrated in wheezy children. The mean of six Rint values was taken as a measurement. If subjects could complete one measurement and then a second 15 min after bronchodilator, baseline testing and reversibility testing were considered feasible. To measure repeatability, two measurements 30 s apart and measurements before and 15 min after placebo bronchodilator were compared. Measurements by two testers were compared for interrater reliability. Change in Rint in wheezy children was measured after bronchodilator. Fifty-six per cent of 2-3-yr-olds (n=79), 81% of 3-4-yr-olds (n=104) and 95% of 4-5-yr-olds (n=88) completed baseline testing, and 53%, 71% and 91% completed reversibility testing. Baseline measurements were 0.47-2.56 kPa x L(-1) x s. Repeatabilities (2 SD of the mean differences between measurements) at 30 s in the three age bands were 0.21, 0.17 and 0.15 kPa x L(-1) x s and 0.19 kPa x L(-1) x s after placebo. Using 0.21 kPa x L(-1) x s as the threshold for reversibility, reversibility was demonstrated in most wheezy children. Interrater reliability was 0.15 kPa x L(-1) x s. Preschool children can undertake measurements of airway resistance by the interrupter technique in ambulatory settings and reversibility to bronchodilator in wheezy children can be demonstrated. This technique promises to be a useful clinical and research tool.     

Discriminative capacity of bronchodilator response measured with three different lung function techniques in asthmatic and healthy children aged 2 to 5 years

The primary aim of this study was to quantify and compare bronchodilator responsiveness in healthy and asthmatic children aged 2 to 5 yr. The secondary aim of the study was to compare discriminative capacity (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the reversibility test for the diagnosis of asthma) for each of the lung function tests applied in the study. Specific airway resistance (sRaw) as measured by whole-body plethysmography, respiratory resistance as measured with the interrupter technique (Rint), and respiratory resistance and reactance at 5 Hz (Rrs5, Xrs5, respectively) as measured with the impulse oscillation technique were assessed before and 20 min after inhalation of terbutaline from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler via a metal spacer by 92 children (37 healthy controls and 55 asthmatic subjects). The study of healthy children followed a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, whereas the study of asthmatic children was open. Baseline lung function was significantly decreased in asthmatic children as compared with healthy control subjects as reflected by all techniques used in the study. sRaw, Rint, and Rrs5, but not Xrs5, improved significantly with terbutaline as compared with placebo in healthy control subjects. Lung function improved to a significantly greater extent in asthmatic children than in control subjects as reflected by all methods. sRaw provided the best discriminative power of such a bronchodilator response, with a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 81% at the cutoff level of a 25% decrease in sRaw after bronchodilator administration. In conclusion, bronchodilator response measured by sRaw allows a separation of asthmatic from healthy young children. This may help define asthma in this clinically difficult-to-manage group of young wheezy children. The sensitivity and specificity of the other methods used in the study were less than those of sRaw.