Perceived need for mental health treatment in a nationally representative Canadian sample.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal method of determining how many people in the general population need help for emotional problems remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and correlates of self-perceived need for mental health services (that is, help seeking and perceived need) in a large, population-based sample. METHODS: Data came from the Canadian Community Health Survey 1.2 (n = 36,816, respondent age 15 years and over, and response rate 77%). Respondents were asked whether they had sought help in the past year from any professional for emotional problems and whether they felt they needed help for emotional symptoms but had not sought treatment. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) was used to make DSM-IV mental disorder diagnoses. RESULTS: The past-year prevalences of help seeking and perceived need were 8.7% and 2.9%, respectively. After adjusting for the presence of DSM-IV disorders assessed in the survey, sociodemographic factors, illness severity, social supports, and the presence of physical health conditions were associated with help seeking and perceived need. Independent of DSM diagnoses, sociodemographics, and social supports, perceived need and help seeking were associated with increased levels of distress, disability, and suicidal ideation and attempts. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates that, in addition to the presence of a DSM diagnosis, the respondent's self-perceived need for mental health treatment is important in the assessment of need for mental health services in the community.     

Mental health treatment seeking by military members with posttraumatic stress disorder: findings on rates, characteristics, and predictors from a nationally representative Canadian military sample.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to identify rates, characteristics, and predictors of mental health treatment seeking by military members with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHOD: Our sample was drawn from the 2002 Canadian Community Health Survey-Canadian Forces Supplement (CCHS-CF) dataset. The CCHS-CF is the first epidemiologic survey of PTSD and other mental health conditions in the Canadian military and includes 8441 nationally representative Canadian Forces (CF) members. Of those, 549 who met the criteria for lifetime PTSD were included in our analyses. To identify treatment rates and characteristics, we examined frequency of treatment contact by professional and facility type. To identify predictors of treatment seeking, we conducted a binary logistic regression with lifetime treatment seeking as the outcome variable. RESULTS: About two-thirds of those with PTSD consulted with a professional regarding mental health problems. The most frequently consulted professionals, during both the last year and lifetime, included social workers and counsellors, medical doctors and general practitioners, and psychiatrists. Consultations during the last year most often took place in a CF facility. Treatment seeking was predicted by cumulative lifetime trauma exposure, index traumatic event type, PTSD symptom interference, and comorbid major depressive disorder. Those with comorbid depression were 3.75 times more likely to have sought treatment than those without. CONCLUSIONS: Although a significant portion of military members with PTSD sought mental health treatment, 1 in 3 never did. Trauma-related and illness and (or) need factors predicted treatment seeking. Of all the predictors of treatment seeking, comorbid depression most increased the likelihood of seeking treatment.     

Treatment seeking for depression in Canada and the United States

OBJECTIVE: Cross-country comparisons of patterns of mental health treatment seeking provide insights into the impact of contextual factors on mental health service use. This study aimed to compare prevalence and predictors of mental health treatment seeking among adults with major depression in Canada and the United States. METHODS: Data for 751 participants with a probable major depressive episode in the past 12 months were drawn from the 2002-2003 Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health: 304 were from Canada and 447 were from the United States. Probable major depressive episodes were ascertained by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Short-Form. Patterns of contacts with mental health and general health providers for mental health reasons were compared. RESULTS: Prevalence of contacts with any provider for mental health problems was similar among participants with a probable major depressive episode in Canada and the United States (181 Canadians, or 56 percent, compared with 245 Americans, or 52 percent). Canadian participants were more likely than those in the United States to seek treatment for mental health problems from family doctors and general practitioners, and among participants who sought such treatment, Canadians were more likely to also seek treatment from mental health professionals. In both countries, racial or ethnic minorities were less likely than Caucasians to seek treatment. Depression severity was more closely associated with treatment seeking in Canada than in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Although studies from the early 1990s showed higher rates of treatment seeking for depression in Canada than in the United States, the more recent data presented here do not show such a gap. However, differences persist in the use of various providers. Compared with the United States, Canada had a closer match between depression severity and treatment, which suggests more efficient allocation of mental health care resources for treatment of depression in Canada.     

Role of stigma and attitudes toward help-seeking from a general practitioner for mental health problems in a rural town

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of perceived stigma and attitudes to seeking care in predicting help-seeking from a general practitioner (GP) for mental health problems. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey in 2002 with self-report questionnaires assessing current levels of symptomatology, disability, attitudes towards mental illness, knowledge of prevalence and causes of mental illness, contact with mental illness and help-seeking behaviour and preferences and attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help. RESULTS: No significant relationship was found between symptom measures and measures of disability and help-seeking. Variables positively associated with general attitudes to seeking professional psychological help were: lower perceived stigma, and biological rather than person-based causal attributions for schizophrenia. Willingness to discuss mental health issues with a GP was predicted by the perceived helpfulness of the GP and by no other variable. CONCLUSIONS: Causal attributions and perceived stigma rather than participants' levels of symptomatology and disability influence attitudes to help-seeking for mental health issues. Efforts to improve attitudes to help-seeking should focus on reducing stigma and improving mental health literacy regarding the causes of disorders.     

Mental health services received by depressed persons who visited general practitioners and family doctors

OBJECTIVES: This study estimated the rates of mental health service provision and of specialist referral in primary care in Canada and investigated factors associated with receiving mental health services and with referral to mental health specialists among persons who reported major depressive episodes. METHOD:S: Data from the 1998-1999 Canadian National Population Health Survey were used. The 608 respondents who reported having major depressive episodes in the 12 months preceding the survey and who reported contacting a general practitioner or family doctor during that time were included in the study. The rates of provision of mental health services by general practitioners and family doctors and of referral to mental health specialists were calculated. Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics associated with receiving mental health services and with referral to specialists were investigated. RESULTS: Among the 608 respondents who had contacted general practitioners or family doctors for any reason, 153 had contacted them for emotional or mental problems. Of this subgroup of 153, 64.5 percent received mental health services either from these practitioners or by referral to specialists, and 26 percent were referred to mental health specialists. Depressed respondents who reported having talked to a general practitioner or family doctor about mental health problems, who reported impairment, and whose depressive symptoms had lasted eight or more weeks were more likely to have received mental health services. Respondents aged 12 to 24 years were more likely to be referred to mental health specialists. CONCLUSION:S: Impairment associated with depression and chronicity of depressive symptoms appear to be the primary determinants of the decisions made by general practitioners and family doctors about providing mental health services. Patients' willingness to consult with general practitioners or family doctors for mental health problems may also be a key factor, both for effective management of depression in primary care settings and for referral to mental health specialists.     

Why wait? Reasons for delay and prompts to seek help for mental health problems in an Australian clinical sample

Abstract. Background: The initial delay to seek treatment accounts for a significant proportion of the unmet need for treatment of common psychiatric conditions. This study aimed to examine the barriers to initial help-seeking and factors that facilitate help-seeking for anxiety and depression. Methods: Help-seeking history was retrospectively self-reported by 233 patients at a specialist anxiety clinic, all of whom had delayed seeking professional treatment for at least one month. Data gathered included age at onset, age at help-seeking, primary reason for the delay, prompt to seek help and first professional contacted. Results: The most frequently endorsed reasons for the delay related to lack of knowledge about mental illness or available treatment. Increasing illness severity or disability was the primary prompt to seek help for the majority of respondents. Reason for the delay showed some relationship with length of the delay, but prompt to seek help did not. A general medical practitioner (GP) was the first professional contacted in 71% of cases. Conclusions: Lack of public mental health literacy contributes to slow problem recognition. Increasing illness severity eventually facilitates problem recognition and prompts help-seeking. Structural barriers to initial help-seeking are relatively unimportant within the Australian health care system. General practitioners play an important role as gate-keepers to appropriate mental health care.     

Review of mental‐health‐related stigma in Japan

The aim of this study is to understand the nature and characteristics of mental‐health‐related stigma among Japanese people. We searched relevant studies in English or Japanese published since 2001 using MEDLINE and PsycINFO, and found 19 studies that examined mental‐health‐related stigma in Japan. Regarding knowledge about mental illness, reviewed studies showed that in the Japanese general population, few people think that people can recover from mental disorders. Psychosocial factors, including weakness of personality, are often considered the cause of mental illness, rather than biological factors. In addition, the majority of the general public in Japan keep a greater social distance from individuals with mental illness, especially in close personal relationships. Schizophrenia is more stigmatized than depression, and its severity increases the stigmatizing attitude toward mental illness. The literature also showed an association between more direct social contact between health professionals and individuals with mental illness and less stigmatization by these professionals. Less stigmatization by mental health professionals may be associated with accumulation of clinical experience and daily contact with people who have mental illness. Stigmatizing attitudes in Japan are stronger than in Taiwan or Australia, possibly due to institutionalism, lack of national campaigns to tackle stigma, and/or society's valuing of conformity in Japan. Although educational programs appear to be effective in reducing mental‐health‐related stigma, future programs in Japan need to address problems regarding institutionalism and offer direct social contact with people with mental illness.     

Pathways to the first contact with specialist mental health care

OBJECTIVE: To examine the pathways to mental health care followed by patients presenting for the first time to community- and hospital-based services and the degree to which individual characteristics, cultural background, illness type, severity and service-related variables influence the time and pathways taken to reach care. METHOD: One hundred and forty-six consecutive Australian-born, Asian and Arabic-speaking patients making their first lifetime contact with mental health services in two area health regions were included. Symptom severity was assessed using the Health of the Nations Outcome Scales. Illness explanatory models, social support, English-language proficiency and acculturation were also assessed. RESULTS: An average of three professional consultations were made prior to first contact with public mental health services. Family physicians occupied a pivotal role in the help-seeking pathway with 53% of patients consulting a general practitioner. The median time taken to reach specialist mental health services was 6 months, with significantly shorter time for patients with psychotic disorders. Individual variables such as gender, social support, ethnicity and English fluency were not associated with delays in receiving public mental health care. Ethnicity was associated with lower utilization of allied health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that social and cultural factors influence the range of professionals consulted by those with a mental illness but do not delay their presentation to public mental health services.     

Rural–urban differences in the prevalence of major depression and associated impairment

BACKGROUND: The possibility of a rural and urban difference in the prevalence of major depression has been of interest to researchers and mental health service providers. The objectives of this analysis were to determine the rural and urban difference in the 12-month prevalence of major depressive episode(s) (MDE) in Canada and whether participants in rural and urban areas differed in the impairment levels due to depressive symptoms and in mental health service utilization. METHODS: Data from the 1998-1999 Canadian National Population Health Survey (NPHS) were used in this study. In the NPHS, MDE was measured by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Short Form for Major Depression. Two-week disability and daily life interference due to depressive symptoms were used as indicators of impairment in this analysis. The prevalence of MDE in rural and urban areas, at national and regional levels, was calculated. The association between urbanicity and MDE was evaluated by Odds Ratios, controlling for potential confounders. Impairment levels and mental health service utilization were also compared between the rural and urban groups. RESULTS: NPHS participants in rural areas had a lower prevalence of MDE than those in urban areas, controlling for the effects of race, immigration status, working status and marital status. Non-immigrants and those who are white in rural areas had a lower prevalence of MDE than did those in urban areas, and such differences depended on age and geographic regions. Rural and urban participants did not differ in 2-week disability and daily life interference due to depressive symptoms. However, rural participants were less likely to have contacted health professionals for mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS: The reasons for the rural and urban differences in the prevalence of MDE are complex. This may depend on individuals' age, immigration status, race, working status, marital status and the provinces where they live. These differences should be considered in future mental health service planning, particularly at provincial levels. There may be gaps between rural and urban areas in terms of availability of mental health services. This should be addressed in future studies and in mental health service planning.     

Do Canada and the United States differ in prevalence of depression and utilization of services?

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the prevalence of depression and the determinants of mental health service use in Canada and the United States. METHODS: The study used data from preliminary analyses of the 2003 Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health, which measured Canadian (N=3,505) and United States (N=5,183) resident ratings of health and health care services. Cross-national comparisons were made for the 12-month prevalence of DSM-IV major depression, 12-month service use for mental health reasons according to the type of professional seen, and determinants of service use. RESULTS: The rates of depression were similar in Canada (8.2%) and the United States (8.7%). However, U.S. respondents without medical insurance were twice as likely as Canadian respondents and U.S. respondents with medical insurance to meet the criteria for depression. Rates of mental health service use did not differ between Canada (10.1%) and the United States (10.6%). In the United States, medical insurance was not a determinant factor of service use. However, U.S. respondents with no medical insurance were more likely than the other two groups to report an unmet need. Also, among those with depression, U.S. respondents with no medical insurance were less likely to use any type of mental health service (36.5%) than U.S. respondents with medical insurance (55.7%) and Canadians (55.7%). Further, a positive correlation between a mental health need and service use was observed in Canada but not for those without medical insurance in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the prevalence of depression and mental health service use between Canada and the United States. Among those with depression, however, disparities in treatment seeking were found to be associated with medical insurance in the United States. Both Canada and the United States need to improve access to health services for those with mental disorders, and special attention is needed for those without medical insurance in the United States.     

Associations between stigma and help-seeking intentions and beliefs: Findings from an Australian national survey of young people

To reduce stigma and improve help seeking by young people for mental illness, we need a better understanding of the associations between various dimensions of stigma and young people's help-seeking intentions and helpfulness beliefs for various sources of help and for different disorders. This study assessed stigmatizing attitudes and help-seeking intentions and helpfulness beliefs via a national telephone survey of 3021 youths aged 15–25. Five stigma scales were used: social distance, personally held weak-not-sick and dangerousness beliefs, and weak-not-sick and dangerousness beliefs perceived in others. Respondents were presented with a vignette of a young person portraying depression, depression with suicidal thoughts, depression with alcohol abuse, post-traumatic stress disorder, social phobia, or psychosis. Beliefs that mental illness is a sign of personal weakness and preference for social distance were associated with less intention to seek professional help and less endorsement of their helpfulness. In contrast, dangerousness/unpredictability beliefs were associated with more intention to seek professional help and more endorsement of their helpfulness. Findings highlight the importance of examining the associations between different dimensions of stigma with different sources of help, specifically for various mental disorders, to better inform future efforts to reduce stigma and increase help seeking in young people.     

Perceived need and help-seeking in adults with mood, anxiety, or substance use disorders.

BACKGROUND: A majority of adults with common mental disorders do not seek professional help. To better understand why not, we examined the correlates of various stages of help-seeking, including perceived need for professional help, seeking such help, and from which professionals participants sought help. METHODS: The sample for this study comprised 1792 participants in the National Comorbidity Survey, conducted from 1990-1992, who were diagnosed with a 12-month DSM-III-R mood, anxiety, or substance disorder. In this sample, we assessed correlates of perceived need for professional help, seeking professional help among those with a need, and, among those who did seek professional help, seeking help from mental health professionals. RESULTS: Mood disorders, comorbid mood and anxiety disorders, and mental disorders associated with impairment in role functioning or suicidality were strong predictors of perceived need. Psychopathology was also associated with the decision to seek help from mental health professionals, but not with the decision to seek professional help overall. After controlling for the nature and severity of psychopathology, various sociodemographic and attitudinal factors appeared to be associated with perception of need, help-seeking, and participants' choices of professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Unmet need for mental health care is a serious public health problem. Meeting this need requires expanding our attention beyond psychopathology to various evaluations and decisions that affect help-seeking. Our results suggest the importance of attitude and behavior change strategies in reducing the gap between need and care.     

Patterns of contact of patients' families with mental health professionals and attitudes toward professionals.

Previous studies have shown that many relatives of mentally ill persons are dissatisfied with their relationships with mental health professionals. In this study, 274 relatives or close friends of 168 recently discharged mental patients reported on 1,198 separate contacts with mental health professionals during the course of the patient's illness. Primary kin, such as parents and spouses, were most likely to be in contact with professionals. Different types of professionals were more likely to be in contact with relatives at different points in the patient's illness. Relatives' satisfaction varied significantly for the different types of professionals. Depending on the reason for the contact, 53 to 73 percent of the relatives reported being very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome. Respondents were most satisfied with their contacts with psychologists, followed by nurses, case managers, social workers, and psychiatrists.     

Was there unmet mental health need after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks?

BACKGROUND: This study examined the use of professionals for mental health problems among New York City residents who were directly affected by the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) or had a probable diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or depression in its aftermath. Correlates of help seeking from professionals for mental health problems after the attacks and barriers to care were also assessed. METHOD: Data were from a random digit dial telephone survey of 2,752 adults representative of the Greater New York Metropolitan area conducted 6 months after the September 11 terrorist attacks. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of those directly affected and 36% of those with probable PTSD or depression sought help from a professional for a mental health problem after the attacks. There was little new utilization of professionals for mental health problems after the attacks among persons who were not already receiving care prior to September 11. Barriers that prevented people from seeking help for mental health problems 6 months after the September 11 attacks included traditional barriers to care (e.g., cost) and barriers that are unique to the post-disaster context (e.g., the belief that others need the services more than oneself). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there was potential unmet mental health need in New York City 6 months after the September 11 attacks on the WTC, but these findings should be tempered by research showing an apparent decrease in population-rates of PTSD. In the aftermath of a disaster, interventions should target persons with mental health needs who were not previously seeking help from a professional for a mental health problem.     

Stigma and mood disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To update the reader on current research on stigmatizing attitudes towards people suffering from mood disorders and to describe recent interventions in this area. RECENT FINDINGS: The public generally feels their own attitudes are more favourable to people with depression than 'most other people's' attitudes are. Among those with depressive symptoms, self-stigma in relation to depression is higher than perceived stigma from others, including professionals, thus hindering help seeking. The main factor that seems to improve the attitudes towards people with any mental illness is personal contact. Moderate improvements in attitudes have been achieved with an online intervention. Caution must be taken when ensuring that improvements in knowledge about mental disorders do not lead to increased social distance. SUMMARY: There exists little research on stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mood disorders. Most of the literature on the stigma towards people with mental illness relates to people with more severe disorders such as schizophrenia. When research has been done on mood disorders, the focus has been on perceived stigma and self-stigma. No up-to-date research exists on discrimination experienced by people with mood disorders, and very little research exists on interventions designed to decrease stigmatizing attitudes towards them.     

Comorbidity of major depression with substance use disorders.

OBJECTIVES: In the Canadian adult population, we aimed to 1) estimate the 12-month prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) in persons with a diagnosis of harmful alcohol use, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence; 2) estimate the 12-month prevalence of harmful alcohol use, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence in persons with a 12-month and lifetime diagnosis of MDD; 3) identify socioeconomic correlates of substance use disorder-major depression comorbidity; 4) determine how comorbidity impacts the prevalence of suicidal thoughts; and 5) determine how comorbidity affects mental health care used. METHODS: We examined data from the Canadian Community Health Survey: Mental Health and Well-Being (CCHS 1.2). RESULTS: The 12-month prevalences of MDD in persons with a substance use disorder (SUD) were 6.9% for harmful alcohol use (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2 to 8.5), 8.8% for alcohol dependence (95%CI, 6.6 to 11.0), and 16.1% for drug dependence (95%CI, 10.3 to 21.9). Conversely, the 12-month prevalences of harmful alcohol use, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence in persons with a 12-month diagnosis of MDD were 12.3% (95%CI, 9.4 to 15.2), 5.8% (95%CI, 4.3 to 7.3), and 3.2% (95%CI, 2.0 to 4.4), respectively. Regression modelling did not identify any socioeconomic predictors of SUD-MDD comorbidity. Substance dependence and MDD independently predicted higher prevalence of suicidal thoughts and mental health treatment use. CONCLUSIONS: SUDs cooccur with a high frequency in cases of MDD. Clinicians and mental health services should consider routine assessment of SUDs in depression patients.     

Attitudes of mental health professionals toward people with schizophrenia and major depression

Several studies reveal poor knowledge about mental illness in the general population and stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness. However, it is unknown whether mental health professionals hold fewer stigmatizing attitudes than the general population. A survey was conducted of the attitudes of mental health professionals (n = 1073) and members of the public (n = 1737) toward mental illness and their specific reaction toward a person with and without psychiatric symptoms ("non-case" as a reference category). Psychiatrists had more negative stereotypes than the general population. Mental health professionals accepted restrictions toward people with mental illness 3 times less often than the public. Most professionals were able to recognize cases of schizophrenia and depression, but 1 in 4 psychiatrists and psychologists also considered the non-case as mentally ill. The social distance toward both major depression and the non-case was lower than toward schizophrenia. However, in this regard, there was no difference between professionals and the public. The study concludes that the better knowledge of mental health professionals and their support of individual rights neither entail fewer stereotypes nor enhance the willingness to closely interact with mentally ill people.     

Religiosity and help-seeking in a rural and an urban area

Help-seeking for emotional problems addressed to priests was compared with help-seeking addressed to general practitioners (GPs), psychiatrists and psychologists in two demographically different areas of Norway. Only small differences were found between the rural and the urban area, and a substantial proportion of people contacted priests for personal/emotional problems. This contact was not related to dissatisfaction with the mental health system, and we found no evidence for a religiosity gap between mental health professionals, on the one hand, and people contacting priests, on the other. People contacting priests also had a stronger general willingness to seek help from other professionals compared to the general population. In both the rural and urban areas, seeking help from priests because of mental problems was related to having experienced a personal loss (death of a spouse, separation, divorce), in addition to having a religious commitment.     

Mental, physical and functional status in primary care attenders

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to analyze the association, in primary care attenders, between psychiatric disorders, medical comorbidity, and impairment in mental and physical function status. METHODS: The study had a two-stage design. The GHQ-12 was used to screen 1647 patients, and 323 of them were then interviewed using the CIDI-PHC to obtain ICD-10 diagnoses. Severity of mental illness was assessed using the Hamilton scales for anxiety and depression. The DUSOI was used to evaluate the severity of physical illness. The MOS SF-36 was used to assess health related quality of life. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of ICD-10 psychiatric disorders and subthreshold disorders was 12.4 percent and 18 percent respectively. The most common psychiatric disorders were generalized anxiety, major depression, and neurasthenia. The severity of physical illness did not vary across diagnostic status categories. Significant impairment, both in physical and mental functioning was seen in patients suffering from ICD-10 full-fledged and subthreshold disorders. Severity of impairment increased from sub-threshold cases to full-fledged cases, and among the latter according to the severity of depressive and anxious symptoms, assessed using Hamilton scales. The most frequent psychiatric disorders were associated with significant worsening in health related quality of life, with relevant differences between psychiatric diagnoses regarding the domains affected. Impairment associated with mental disorders was greater than that associated with physical illness. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study confirm that ICD-10 psychiatric disorders are common in general practice and are associated with relevant impairment in physical and mental functional status. Psychiatric morbidity is not related to severity of physical illness rated by general practitioner.