Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Patients with Endoscopy-Negative Iron Deficiency

Background and Aim

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common problem among the elderly, and often no cause is identified after routine upper endoscopy and colonoscopy exams. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes and predictors of gastrointestinal pathology and death in patients with endoscopy-negative IDA.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of consecutive endoscopy negative-IDA patients during 2002–2004 at the VA San Diego Healthcare System.

Results

Mean age was 69.3 years (range 42–93), and included 105 men and nine women. Mean length of follow-up was 65.1 months. IDA resolved in 56 patients. None of these patients developed evidence of any clinically significant gastrointestinal pathology. The remaining 58 patients had persistent anemia (n = 47) or recurrent anemia (n = 11). Only 2/47 patients with persistent anemia were found to have clinically significant but benign gastrointestinal pathology during follow-up. In contrast, 6/11 patients with recurrent anemia were subsequently found to have gastrointestinal pathology. Deaths during follow-up occurred in 7 (12.5 %) patients with resolved anemia, compared with 20 (34.5 %) patients with recurrent or persistent anemia (p = 0.006). Significant independent predictors of death included persistent or recurrent anemia, anti-platelet or anticoagulant use, and congestive heart failure.

Conclusions

Patients with iron deficiency anemia and negative upper endoscopy and colonoscopy often have a favorable outcome, especially if the anemia resolves with treatment. In patients with recurrent anemia a malignancy within reach of standard endoscopy and colonoscopy are possible, and repeating these procedures is warranted before consideration of further investigations.     

The Evaluation of Premenopausal Women with Anemia: What Is the Yield of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy?

Anemia is not uncommon in premenopausal women. The purpose of this study was to determine the yield of endoscopy in premenopausal women with anemia. We identified and reviewed the medical records of 168 premenopausal women who underwent upper endoscopy and/or colonoscopy for the indication of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) during the years 1996 through 2005. Of the 168 patients, 100 (59.5%) underwent upper endoscopy and 155 (92.3%) underwent colonoscopy. Eighty-seven (51.8%) patients underwent both procedures. The mean age was 43.1 ± 5.8 years. The mean hemoglobin was 10.2 ± 1.3 g/dl. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) lesions potentially causative for anemia were found in 7 of 100 patients who underwent upper endoscopy (7%). Significant lower GI lesions were found in 6 of 155 (3.9%) of those who had a colonoscopy. Our data suggest that both upper endoscopy and colonoscopy were useful in the detection of significant gastrointestinal lesions in premenopausal women with anemia.     

A prospective, multidisciplinary evaluation of premenopausal women with iron-deficiency anemia

Objective: The cause of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in premenopausal women is often presumed to be menstrual blood loss. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of a comprehensive gynecological and gastrointestinal evaluation in premenopausal women with IDA. Methods: Nineteen premenopausal, nonpregnant women older than 18 yr of age with IDA defined by a hemoglobin < 12 gm/dl with serum ferritin < 10 ng/ml participated in the study. Evaluations included directed history and physical examination by a specialist in gynecology and a subspecialist in gastroenterology, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, upper gastrointestinal radiography with small bowel follow-through, antiendomysial antibody, and fecal occult blood tests. Results: Seven of 19 (37%) premenopausal women with IDA were diagnosed to have a gynecological cause of anemia by a specialist in that field. Although only four of these seven patients had digestive complaints, all but one (86%) were discovered to have gastrointestinal disease by upper endoscopy; findings were duodenal ulcer and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) gastritis (one), esophagitis and H. pylori gastritis (one), erosive esophagitis (one), gastric arteriovenous malformations (one), and nodular/erosive H. pylori gastritis (two). Fecal occult blood testing was positive in only two (29%) subjects; upper endoscopy revealed erosive esophagitis and gastric arteriovenous malformations. Twelve of the 19 (63%) premenopausal women with IDA were not diagnosed to have a gynecological source of anemia by a specialist in that field. Fecal occult blood testing was negative among all women tested and the only digestive complaint was heartburn (pyrosis) in seven. Each was identified to have esophagitis, duodenal ulcer, or gastritis by upper endoscopy. Colonoscopic examination of the 12 subjects without gynecologic etiology for IDA revealed pan colitis (one), diverticulosis (one), diverticulosis and melanosis coli (one), hyperplastic polyps (one), and nodular lymphoid aggregates (one). Conclusions: Significant upper gastrointestinal disease is identifiable among most premenopausal women with IDA (18 of 19 or 95%), even when careful evaluation by a specialist in gynecology suggests a gynecological source. Upper endoscopy should be considered in the evaluation of all premenopausal women with IDA expressing digestive complaints or in those with IDA refractory to iron supplementation. Lower endoscopic examination may be reserved for those women with symptoms or signs suggestive of colorectal disorders.     

Outcomes of endoscopy in patients with iron deficiency anemia after Billroth II partial gastrectomy

GOALS: To determine the frequency of gastrointestinal lesions detected by upper endoscopy and colonoscopy in patients who developed iron deficiency anemia after Billroth II surgery. STUDY: The authors reviewed the medical records of 116 consecutive patients with a Billroth II partial gastrectomy and 232 age- and gender-matched controls without gastric surgery who were referred for endoscopy to evaluate iron deficiency anemia over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Clinically important lesions were detected in 22.4% of the patients with gastric surgery and in 59.5% of those with intact stomachs (p < 0.001). In the gastric surgery group, clinically important lesions were found more often in the upper gastrointestinal tract than in the colon (19.0% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001). In the nonsurgical group, the diagnostic yields of upper endoscopy and colonoscopy were not significantly different (38.4% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.24). Synchronous lesions in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract were significantly less common in the group of patients with gastric surgery compared with those without gastric surgery (0.0% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.001). Small bowel biopsies and small bowel follow-through did not identify any additional lesions. In the gastric surgery group, multivariate analysis identified abdominal symptoms (OR = 11.2, 95% CI 3.2-39.2, p < 0.001), a positive result on fecal occult blood testing (OR = 6.4, 95% CI 2.0-20.3, p = 0.002), and Billroth II surgery at least 10 years before evaluation (OR = 5.4, 95% CI 1.7-16.7, p = 0.004) as independent predictors of identifying a clinically important lesion by endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Upper endoscopy had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than colonoscopy in patients who developed iron deficiency anemia after Billroth II surgery. Prospective studies are necessary to determine the role and cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in the evaluation of iron deficiency anemia in this patient population.     

The outcome of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in asymptomatic outpatients with iron deficiency anemia after a negative colonoscopy

Background: Both iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia require extensive investigation because of their possible association with gastrointestinal malignancy. If no other sources of blood loss are apparent, the gastrointestinal tract is examined to detect sources of occult blood loss. In the absence of gastrointestinal symptoms, the colon is first examined, especially in the elderly. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) after a prior negative colonoscopy in outpatients without gastrointestinal complaints, referred due to iron deficiency anemia. Methods: Thirty-five patients (22 female and 13 male) with a median age of 71 years were studied over a 2-year period. Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin (Hb) level below 7.4 mmol/l in women or below 8.0 mmol/l in men and iron deficiency if one of the following was present: ferritin level equal to or below 20 μg/l for men and equal to or below 10 μg/l for women, a serum iron concentration equal to or below 45 μg/dl (8.1 μmol/l) with a transferrin saturation of 10% or less, or the absence of iron stores in bone marrow biopsy specimens. Patients with prior gastrointestinal disease or surgery, gastrointestinal symptoms, or other obvious causes of blood loss were excluded. Lesions that were considered to be potential sources of blood loss were clearly defined. Results: The mean Hb level of the 35 patients studied was 5.5 mmol/l (range 1.8-7.8 mmol/l). Abnormalities were found in 10 patients (28.6%), all of which were benign. Erosive and ulcerative lesions in the stomach, in a hiatal hernia, or in the esophagus were diagnosed in eight patients, benign villous adenoma was seen in one patient, and celiac disease in another, although duodenal biopsies were taken in only 15 patients. Erosions and/or ulcerations were found in four of 11 patients (36%) using NSAIDs and/or salicylates (ASA). Seventy percent of the lesions were found in elderly patients (>65 years), 56% of whom were using NSAIDs and/or ASA. Conclusions: EGD should always be performed in patients with iron deficiency anemia after a negative colonoscopy, although upper gastrointestinal malignancy will probably be an infrequent finding. The presence of a significant, treatable lesion is most likely in the elderly and in those with a history of NSAID or ASA use. Routine duodenal biopsies should be performed to further increase the outcome of EGD.     

Prospective evaluation of gastrointestinal tract in patients with iron-deficiency anemia

Gastrointestinal bleeding is believed to cause iron-deficiency anemia (IDA). The information concerning ideal evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract and exact findings in patients with IDA is scant. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate patients with IDA for gastrointestinal lesions potentially causing IDA at a US Army Teaching Medical Center with Gastroenterology Fellowship. Seventy patients with IDA had esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy, and if this evaluation was unremarkable, then small bowel biopsy was obtained at EGD to evaluate for celiac disease. Enteroclysis was done if endoscopic evaluation was negative. At endoscopy, at least one lesion potentially accounted for the IDA in 50 (71%) patients. At colonoscopy, 21 (30%) patients had 22 lesions (four colon cancer, seven adenoma>1 cm, six vascular malformation, four severely bleeding hemorrhoids, one ileal Crohn's); at EGD, 39 (56%) patients had 43 lesions (11 gastric erosion, 10 esophagitis, four vascular malformation, four celiac disease, three gastric cancer, three gastric ulcer, three duodenal ulcer, two gastric polyp>1 cm, one duodenal lymphoma, one esophageal cancer, and one duodenal Crohn's). Twelve (17%) patients had both upper and lower gastrointestinal tract lesions. Twenty-four of 32 (75%) patients with positive fecal occult blood test had potentially bleeding lesions compared to 24 of 38 (63%) patients with negative fecal occult blood test (P>0.05). Six of nine patients with malignancy had positive fecal occult blood test. Twenty patients with normal endoscopy and small bowel biopsy had normal enteroclysis. It is concluded that the combination of colonoscopy and EGD identifies potential bleeding sources in most patients with IDA. In the absence of a potential bleeding lesion, small bowel biopsy at EGD is essential to diagnose celiac disease.The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.     

Upper and lower gastrointestinal evaluation of elderly inpatients who are iron deficient.

PURPOSE: Iron deficiency anemia is commonly caused by chronic gastrointestinal blood loss, and a thorough examination of the gastrointestinal tract has become standard practice. In contrast, iron deficiency without anemia has hardly been studied, and its causes are less certain. The aim of the present study was to determine the diagnostic value of upper and lower gastrointestinal evaluation in elderly hospitalized patients with iron deficiency, irrespective of the hemoglobin level. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 151 consecutive elderly patients with iron deficiency (serum ferritin level < 50 microg/L at two separate occasions) were investigated using esophagogastroduodenoscopy with colonoscopy (n = 90) or barium enema (n = 61). RESULTS: A potential upper gastrointestinal tract lesion was found in 47 (49%) of the 96 anemic patients and in 31 (56%) of the 55 nonanemic patients (P = 0.38). Nonanemic patients had a greater prevalence of erosive gastritis or duodenitis. Anemic patients (72%) were more frequently investigated with a colonoscopy than nonanemic patients (38%, P = 0.001), and a lower gastrointestinal lesion was found in 32% of the anemic patients and 16% of the nonanemic patients (P = 0.03). Cancer was the most common lesion in the colon; 11 of the 18 patients were asymptomatic. Site-specific symptoms, fecal occult blood loss, and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were not associated with the detection of gastrointestinal lesions. In 9.5% of the patients with a benign upper gastrointestinal lesion, a synchronous colonic tumor was found. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with iron deficiency should undergo endoscopic examination, irrespective of the hemoglobin level. The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, a positive fecal occult blood test, and the use of NSAIDs are of limited value in guiding the diagnostic procedure.     

Predictive risk factors and prevalence of malignancy in patients with iron deficiency anemia in Taiwan

Gastrointestinal (GI) tract malignancy is one of the important causes of chronic iron deficiency anemia (IDA). The present study was designed to find out the prevalence and the predictive risk factors of malignancy in the IDA patients. We performed a prospective study in 148 patients with chronic IDA. A series of examinations to explore the GI tract were performed either by radiology and/or endoscopy. A Tc-RBC GI bleeding study was also performed, and prevalence and risk factors of malignancy were calculated. Totally 148 patients were enrolled, with mean age 66.2 years; 88 were male. Eighteen patients (12.2%) were found to have malignant tumors. Ten (6.8%) had benign tumors, and 96 (64.9%) had other benign conditions. No lesions could be detected in 24 patients (16.2%). Clinical symptoms and presence of fecal occult blood could not predict malignancy or any GI lesions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed serum ferritin < or =10 microg/L, LDH >250 U/L, and aging as the risk factors of malignancy in the IDA patients (P = 0.003, 0.002, and 0.027; and OR = 7.614, 8.955, and 1.062, respectively). An IDA patient with both serum ferritin < or =10 microg/L and LDH >250 U/L ran a 74.33-times higher risk of malignancy than the patient without (95% CI: 7.115-776.479). Malignancy was an important cause of IDA. High LDH, low serum ferritin, and aging were the risk factors of malignancy in the IDA patients.     

Gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation of premenopausal women with iron deficiency anemia

GOALS: To evaluate whether the gastrointestinal tract could be a source of chronic blood loss in premenopausal women with iron deficiency anemia. BACKGROUND: While premenopausal women with iron deficiency anemia are typically managed with simple iron replacement, the standard of care for postmenopausal women and men is to exclude a gastrointestinal source of bleeding. STUDY: We identified 111 premenopausal women who underwent endoscopy for the sole indication of iron deficiency anemia. RESULTS: The mean age was 42.5 years. Lesions potentially causative of iron deficiency anemia were detected in 22 patients (20%). Upper gastrointestinal lesions were present in 14 patients (13%) and included only erosive lesions. Lower gastrointestinal lesions were detected in 8 patients (7.2%) and included colon cancer (2.7%), inflammatory bowel disease (3.6%), and a colonic ulcer >1 cm (0.9%). Patients with upper gastrointestinal lesions were more likely to use aspirin or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (11/14, 79%) than patients with no lesions (26/89, 23%; P = 0.043). Occult blood was more common in patients with lower gastrointestinal lesions 8/8 (100%) and patients with upper gastrointestinal lesions (9/14, 64%) than in patients without lesions (28/89, 31%; P = 0.037 and 0.039). Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly more common in patients with gastrointestinal lesions than in patients without lesions. CONCLUSIONS: A gastrointestinal source of chronic blood loss was identified in a substantial proportion of premenopausal women with iron deficiency anemia. Patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, fecal occult blood, and/or weight loss should undergo endoscopy.     

Long-term follow-up of patients with iron deficiency anemia after a close endoscopic examination of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND: In patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA) occult gastrointestinal bleeding is generally investigated by bidirectional endoscopy. The aim of our study was to examine the long-term follow-up of patients with IDA where the sources of bleeding couldn't be detected despite close endoscopic and radiologic examination of the GI tract. METHODS: Based on the endoscopic data base we examined consecutive patients who were referred for gastrointestinal endoscopy due to IDA with a negative endoscopic (upper GI endoscopy and colonoscopy) evaluation. Further diagnostic work up (repeated endoscopy of the upper and lower GI tract by an experienced investigator, small bowel enteroclysis, push enteroscopy, proctoscopy, intraoperative enteroscopy, angiography, scintigraphic examinations) was recorded. The eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (no identification of the source of bleeding in the GI tract); group 2 (source of gastrointestinal blood loss was found). Long-term follow-up was performed by telephone interview with patients and/or with their general practitioner. RESULTS: 79 patients (mean age 58.8 years [17-83, 44] female) with IDA met the inclusion criteria. In 42 patients (53%) the endoscopic and radiographic evaluation was unable to find the source of gastrointestinal blood loss. 29 of these patients (69%) showed a resolved anemia after a mean follow-up of 48 months (18 months-5 years). 10 patients had a mild anemia, 3 required blood transfusions. In group one Helicobacter pylori infection was significantly more prevalent in comparison with group 2 (57% vs. 38%, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Based on our data, the prognosis of IDA with negative endoscopy is favorable. The pathogenic role of Helicobacter pylori infection should be evaluated in further studies.     

Management and predictors of early mortality in elderly patients with iron deficiency anemia: a prospective study of 111 patients

OBJECTIVES: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common in the elderly. It usually results from gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and requires endoscopic exploration of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this prospective study in elderly patients was to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopy, the therapeutic impact, and identify predictors of early mortality. METHODS: From June 2003 to May 2005, all patients over 75 years, hospitalized for anemia were screened for iron deficiency. Clinical (including serious comorbidities), biological, endoscopic and therapeutic data were collected. One month after treatment, a follow-up was carried out to assess the tolerance of such investigation and treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients (69 women, 82.3 +/- 6.4 years) had IDA, 102 (92%) underwent an upper endoscopy and 91 (82%) a colonoscopy. Nine (8%) patients were not investigated because of poor clinical condition (N=4) or dementia (N=5). Of the 75 (68%) patients with an identified source of bleeding, 12 (11%) had a synchronous lesion, 43 (39%) a colorectal source including 31 (72%) colorectal cancer, and 44 (40%) an upper GI source. Sixty-nine (92%) of the 75 patients received at least one of the following treatments: medical (N=27), endoscopic (N=20), and surgical (N=31). Surgery was curative in 28/31 (90%) cases of which 25/27 were colorectal cancers. One month after treatment, overall mortality was 11/111 (10%) and 4/31 (13%) after surgery. Predictors of early mortality (Odd ratio, 95% Confidence Interval) were: a malign cause (42; 3-588), no specific treatment (34; 3-423), at least 2 co-morbidities (20; 1-400). CONCLUSION: In an unselected hospitalized population of elderly patients with IDA, endoscopy was generally feasible, allowing identification of a source of bleeding, especially colorectal cancer. A specific treatment was usually possible and proved curative without increase in early mortality.     

A Prospective Study of Bidirectional Endoscopy (Colonoscopy and Upper Endoscopy) in the Evaluation of Patients with Occult Gastrointestinal Bleeding

One hundred patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) (i.e., guaiac-positive stools and/or iron deficiency anemia) were prospectively evaluated with bidirectional endoscopy [upper endoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy] to determine the origin of occult bleeding. Predetermined criteria were used to prospectively define gastrointestinal bleeding sources. Among the 58 males and 42 females, the median age was 65 yr. Thirty-one percent of the group had gastrointestinal symptoms. Sixty-six percent of the study group were inpatients. Bidirectional endoscopy detected the source of OGIB in 53% of patients, with a positive finding on EGD of 36%, and with colonoscopy, of 26%. In only 9% of patients was a source of OGIB detected on both EGD and colonoscopy. Acid peptic disease accounted for the source of OGIB in 27%, colonic adenomas 14%, angiodysplasia 13%, colorectal carcinoma 6%, and gastric cancer in 1% of patients. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher with EGD than with colonoscopy in patients with anemia and guaiac-positive stools (45% vs. 26%, p less than 0.01). Upper endoscopy directed a change in patient management in 29 patients. In conclusion: for the patient population described in this study, bidirectional endoscopy determined the source of OGIB in 50%. As expected, colonoscopy resulted in a higher cancer detection rate than EGD--yet EGD detected the origin of OGIB in 68% (36/53) of patients found to have an occult bleeding source, and resulted in a therapeutic initiation or a change in therapy for 30% of all patients.     

Can patient characteristics predict the outcome of endoscopic evaluation of iron deficiency anemia: a multiple logistic regression analysis

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and biochemical variables that predict the outcome of upper/lower endoscopy in outpatients with iron deficiency anemia and to determine which endoscopic procedure should be performed first. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients (74 women, 24 men; mean age 55 years) with iron deficiency anemia referred from the hematology department were interviewed and responded to a questionnaire that included clinical and biochemical variables, and underwent EGD (with biopsies) and colonoscopy. The endoscopic findings were recorded as presence/absence of GI cancer, upper/lower GI tract lesions and bleeding/non-bleeding-associated GI lesions. A multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to identify variables significantly related with the outcome of the investigations. Multiple analyses were performed so that a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing removed significance except where p<0.01. RESULTS: A likely cause of iron deficiency anemia was found in 86.7% of patients. The risk factors for GI malignancies were: male gender (OR 7.5: 95% CI[1.7, 31.9]; p<0.01), advanced age (OR 1.1/y: 95% CI[1, 1.2]; p<0.01), and lower mean corpuscular volume (OR 1.1/unit: 95% CI[1, 1.2]; p<0.002). The risk factors for bleeding-related diseases were the following: greater age (OR 1.1/y: 95% CI[1.1, 1.2]; p<0.001), absence of lower-GI tract symptoms (OR 4.7: 95% CI[1.3, 16.6]; p<0.05), and a positive fecal occult blood test (OR 4.1: 95% CI[1.2, 14.3]; p<0.05). The risk factors for non-bleeding-related GI tract diseases were the following: negative fecal occult blood test (OR 4.5: 95% CI[1.16, 20]; p<0.05) and higher Hb level (OR 1.4/unit: 95% CI[1.1, 1.8]; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For non-hospitalized patients with iron deficiency anemia, colonoscopy should be the initial investigation in those greater than 50 years of age, particularly men, and those without upper-GI tract symptoms and with lower values for mean corpuscular volume and Hb. EGD should be performed first in younger patients, particularly those with a mild decrease in Hb and a negative fecal occult blood test.     

The investigation of iron deficiency anemia--a hospital based audit

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is associated with an increased incidence of malignancy. Our aim was to audit the management of patients with IDA seen in a teaching hospital gastroenterology unit, and to assess the role of upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy as well as mesenteric angiography in improving the diagnostic yield. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective review of all outpatient letters and in-patient discharge summaries in an 11 month period in 1996 was used to identify anemic patients. All endoscopic and radiological procedures were documented on these patients. RESULTS: 98 cases (46 male) of IDA were identified. Of these, 94% had upper GI endoscopy with a yield for potential bleeding sources of 54% (including 4 malignancies) and 84% had lower GI investigation by colonoscopy or barium enema with a diagnostic yield of 37% (including 3 malignancies and 10 adenomatous polyps). Combined endoscopic and barium examinations provided a positive diagnosis in 69%, and 12.2% had significant co-existent upper and lower GI pathology. Thirty-three patients underwent visceral angiography (27 of who had no positive endoscopic diagnosis). Twenty-seven studies revealed a bleeding source (yield 82%). Overall an underlying diagnosis was made in 92% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of significant dual pathology in patients with IDA was high. Investigation of the lower GI tract should be performed in all patients unless a malignancy is found on upper GI endoscopy. Mesenteric angiography has a high diagnostic yield, and is a useful investigation in patients with resistant or transfusion dependent anemia in whom endoscopic or barium studies are normal.     

Iron deficiency anaemia: a review of diagnosis, investigation and management

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is the most common form of anaemia worldwide. In men and postmenopausal women the commonest cause of IDA is blood loss from lesions in the gastrointestinal tract, making it a common cause of referral to gastroenterologists. Causes of IDA relate either to blood loss or iron malabsorption. After confirmation with laboratory tests, gastrointestinal evaluation is almost always indicated to exclude gastrointestinal malignancy. Specific patient groups such as premenopausal women, patients with low-normal ferritin and iron-deficient patients without anaemia may need an individualized approach. A small proportion of patients have recurrent or persistent IDA despite negative standard endoscopies. These patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding usually require evaluation of the small bowel with capsule endoscopy or double balloon enteroscopy. Treatment should involve prompt iron replacement plus diagnostic steps directed towards correcting the underlying cause of IDA. Oral iron replacement is cheap and effective, but parenteral (intravenous) therapy may be required due to intolerance, noncompliance or treatment failure with oral therapy.     

Gastrointestinal tract evaluation in patients with iron deficiency anemia.

Iron deficiency anemia is the most common form of anemia encountered in clinical practice and is an extremely common manifestation of chronic occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Current evidence suggests that a large proportion of men and postmenopausal women with iron deficiency anemia harbor significant gastrointestinal tract pathological lesions as the source of blood loss. As such, the evaluation of patients with iron deficiency anemia is generally focused on the gastrointestinal tract. Importantly, the diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia should be firmly established before an extensive evaluation is undertaken. Management strategies for patients with iron deficiency anemia are reviewed; an important general point is that clinical features (ie, symptoms) may help direct specific investigation. The role of small-intestinal investigation in patients with iron deficiency anemia is controversial and should probably be reserved for patients with iron deficiency anemia and persistent gastrointestinal symptoms or those who fail to respond to appropriate therapy. The treatment and prognosis of patients with iron deficiency anemia and the majority of gastrointestinal tract lesions are straightforward. However, patients with vascular ectasias as the source of blood loss can represent a true management challenge.     

Is upper gastrointestinal endoscopy indicated in asymptomatic patients with a positive fecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy?

PURPOSE: There are no recommendations as to whether endoscopic evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract is indicated in asymptomatic patients who have a positive fecal occult blood test and a negative colonoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All asymptomatic patients with a positive fecal occult blood test who were referred for diagnostic endoscopy were identified. Patient charts, endoscopy records, and pathology reports were reviewed. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, 498 asymptomatic patients with a positive fecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy were evaluated. An upper gastrointestinal source of occult bleeding was detected in 67 patients (13%), with peptic ulcer disease being the most common lesion identified (8%). Four patients were diagnosed with gastric cancer and 1 had esophageal carcinoma. In addition, 74 patients (15%) had lesions that were not considered a source of occult bleeding; these findings prompted a change in management in 56 patients (11%). Anemia was the only variable significantly associated with having a clinically important lesion identified (multivariate odds ratio = 5.0; 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 8.5; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy yields important findings in asymptomatic patients with a positive fecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy. Our data suggest that endoscopic evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract should be considered, especially in patients with anemia.     

Evaluation of iron deficiency anaemia in tertiary hospital settings: room for improvement?

Background: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a marker of occult blood loss from gastrointestinal (GI) lesions and requires thorough GI evaluation. Aim: This study aimed to determine frequency and findings of GI endoscopy in patients with IDA attending a tertiary hospital, and associations of endoscopy with patient and clinician‐related factors and results of faecal occult blood tests (FOBT). Methods: Retrospective audit of 621 subjects identified with definite and probable IDA (serum ferritin ≤15 ug/L and 16–50 µg/L respectively) between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 31 2008. Subjects were analysed as males >18 years and females ≥45 years of age with definite (group A, n= 180) or probable (group B, n= 353) IDA, and females <45 years of age with definite or probable IDA (group C, n= 88). Results: Endoscopy of any type was documented in 310 (50%) of patients with oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy, and colonoscopy rates being significantly higher in group A patients (61% and 56% respectively) than in group B (39%, 37%) and group C (30%, 31%; P≤ 0.01 for all comparisons). Endoscopy rates ranged from 96% of patients seeing gastroenterologists to 31% of those seeing nephrologists. In patients undergoing colonoscopy, cancer and high‐risk adenomas were detected in 51 patients (20%), ranging from 27/100 (27%) of group A, 23/130 (18%) of group B and 1/27 (4%) of group C. Lesion prevalence was similar (19–24%) regardless of whether FOBT yielded positive or negative results or had not been performed. Conclusions: Almost one in two patients with IDA were not documented as undergoing GI endoscopy. More intense guideline promulgation, improved endoscopy access and ongoing practice audits are required to improve endoscopy rates.     

Iron-deficiency anemia due to chronic gastrointestinal bleeding.

AIMS: chronic gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common cause of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in the general population. The objectives of this study were to determine the most frequent gastrointestinal lesions in IDA, the frequency and localization of potentially bleeding lesions, the value of the clinical history in diagnosis, the value of fecal occult blood testing, and the most appropriate diagnostic procedure for these patients. METHODS: we prospectively studied 80 patients older than 40 years with IDA, using upper gastrointestinal tract (GI) endoscopy and colonoscopy, beginning with the former (group A) or the latter (group B) depending on the clinical findings. Barium enema was done when colonoscopy was incomplete or unsatisfactory. If all these tests were negative, conventional barium contrast study of the small intestine and arteriography were done, if necessary. RESULTS: upper GI endoscopy found at least one lesion in 50 patients (72%), 13 in association with a colonic lesion (26%). Colonoscopy detected at least one lesion in 31 patients (45%), among whom 11 had another upper GI lesion (35.5%). Barium enema was positive in 4 out of 24 patients (17%). Barium contrast study of the small intestine detected lesions in 1 out of 7 patients (14%), and arteriography in 1 out of 4 patients (25%). The most common upper GI lesions were of peptic origin (esophagitis in 10, gastroduodenal erosions in 10, and peptic ulcer in 8). Neoplasms (17 cancers and 3 polyps) were the most common colonic lesion. Thirteen out of 38 patients (34%) with a potentially bleeding benign upper GI lesion had another lesion in the colon. The fecal occult blood test was positive in 9 out of 10 patients with colonic cancer and in 5 out of 9 with gastric cancer (74% positive predictive value). Nonsteroid antiinflammatory drug use did not correlate with the presence, location or type of lesion. The reliability of the clinically suspected origin of bleeding was 96% sensitivity, 43% specificity and 74% positive predictive value in group A, and 34%, 93% and 80% respectively in group B. CONCLUSIONS: lesions that cause chronic bleeding were more frequently located in the upper digestive tract than in the colon. There was a high prevalence of neoplasms in patients with IDA. One-third of the patients with a potentially bleeding benign lesion in the upper digestive tract had another lesion in the colon. A positive fecal occult blood test correlated highly with neoplastic lesions, and the presence of blood in the stool did not indicate whether bleeding originated in the upper or lower GI tract. Clinical history was of limited value in predicting the location of a bleeding lesion, but can be suggestive of a prior upper GI tract exploration. These patients need a complete study of both the upper and lower GI tracts. In patients in whom the aforementioned explorations are negative, the small bowel should be studied.     

Yield of Upper Endoscopy in the Evaluation of Asymptomatic Patients with Hemoccult-Positive Stool after a Negative Colonoscopy

The yield of upper endoscopy in asymptomatic patients with positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and a negative colonoscopy was evaluated prospectively in 70 consecutive patients. Significant pathology was diagnosed in 19 patients (27%), eight patients with ulcers, five with arteriovenous malformations, three with esophageal or gastric varices, two with multiple erosions, and two with biopsy-proven Barrett's esophagus. Thirteen patients had iron deficiency anemia and demonstrated a 38% prevalence of significant pathology. Fifteen patients on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents had a 30% prevalence of significant pathology. No statistically significant difference was noted between subgroups. In conclusion, asymptomatic patients without a colonic source to explain a positive FOBT often have significant lesions, on upper endoscopy. Iron deficiency anemia did not have an impact on pathology. Because treatment and follow-up plans were altered in many of the cases in which significant pathology was demonstrated, we conclude that upper endoscopy should be seriously considered for all asymptomatic patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding and a negative colonoscopic examination.