Ten-year survival following aortic valve replacement: A multivariate analysis of coronary bypass as a risk factor

The additional risk of coronary bypass surgery was analysed in 664 patients over 40 years of age undergoing aortic valve replacement between 1969 and 1981. Four hundred sixty-seven patients underwent aortic valve replacement alone, while 197 patients with coronary artery disease underwent combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery. There were no significant differences in the preoperative hemodynamic characteristics of the two groups of patients. There were 41 (9%) operative deaths following aortic valve replacement alone and 20 (10%) following aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass surgery. Since 1976, operative mortality has fallen to 5% and perioperative myocardial infarction to 2% following the combined procedure. Ten-year actuarial survival (standard error) was 56 (3%) following aortic valve replacement and 49 (6%) following aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery. A multivariate analysis including both groups of patients revealed that age, functional class and year of operation significantly affected ten-year survival (p less than 0.05). The same analysis showed that coronary artery disease requiring coronary bypass surgery also decreased ten year survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (p = 0.06).     

Combined aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization. Experience with a cold cardioplegic technique.

The authors reviewed their experience with combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting using a standardized cold cardioplegic technique for intraoperative myocardial protection in 54 consecutive patients during a 5-year interval ending in May 1982. Calcific aortic stenosis was the most common indication for aortic valve replacement. Thirty-seven patients (69%) had greater than 50-60% stenoses in at least two of the three major coronary arterial systems. No patient with combined aortic valvular and coronary artery disease had only valve replacement during the study interval, and no patient was refused operation. The mean number of arteries grafted was 2.4. There was one hospital death (1.9%), and one patient (1.9%) had electrocardiographic evidence for perioperative myocardial infarction. One additional patient required postoperative intra-aortic balloon pumping. There have been four late deaths in the followup period extending to 65 months. Survival at 3 years for the entire group was 87%, for the patients with aortic stenosis was 95%, and for the patients with aortic regurgitation or mixed lesions was 65%. There were no cardiac-related deaths among the patients with aortic stenosis and one non-fatal myocardial infarction in the follow-up period. The results with this technique of intraoperative myocardial protection are superior to those reported with previously employed methods (coronary perfusion, hypothermic ischemic arrest) and indicate that coronary artery bypass grafting should be performed in all patients with coexisting aortic valvular and coronary artery disease who require valve replacement. A substantial benefit (increased survival, decreased late myocardial infarction) may exist for the subgroup of patients with aortic stenosis.     

Combining off pump coronary artery bypass with mitral valve replacement

Background Conventional approach to combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) is associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross clamp (ACC) time leading to high operative risk. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of nine consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve replacement combining the off pump technique with cardioplegic arrest. Elective intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) support was instituted in all cases. CABG was first done in all cases without cardiopulmonary bypass support. Mitral valve replacement was then done using conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest using the superior septal approach. Results Nine consecutive patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with mitral valve replacement including three patients with acute myocardial infarction. Preoperative echocardiogram revealed a mean ejection fraction (EF) of 38.4 ± 6.0%. Intra aortic balloon pump was inserted in all patients preoperatively. The average number of grafts were 3.0 ± 0.7. Eight patients received bioprosthetic valve while one patient received mechanical prosthesis. The average length of stay in intensive care unit was 3.3 ± 0.5 days. There was no mortality. One patient had superficial wound infection. Conclusion The data suggest that the combined technique (off pump coronary artery bypass grafting and conventional mitral valve replacement) is a safe method to perform coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve replacement with minimal morbidity and mortality.     

Aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: Whether minimally diseased aortic valves should be replaced during other necessary cardiac operations remains controversial. Part of the decision-making process in that issue revolves around the risks of subsequent aortic valve replacement. This study evaluated the results of aortic valve replacement in patients following prior cardiac surgery. METHODS: From February, 1984 through December, 2001 first-time aortic valve replacement was performed in 132 consecutive patients who had previous cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass. Of those patients 89 (67%) had aortic valve replacement at a mean of 8.3 years after prior coronary artery bypass grafting, and 43 (33%) had aortic valve replacement at a mean of 13.0 years after previous procedures other than myocardial revascularization. Hospital records of all patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Early complications included operative mortality in six (6.7%) of the patients with prior coronary grafting and no mortality in the group with other prior operations. Patients having prior coronary grafting had more nonfatal complications than those with other previous procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement in patients following previous cardiac surgery can be accomplished with acceptable mortality and morbidity. Routine replacement of aortic valves that are minimally diseased during coronary artery bypass grafting may not be warranted.     

Aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass grafting. Significant determinants of ten-year survival

Concomitant aortic valve replacement (AVR) and myocardial revascularization were performed on 197 patients between 1969 and 1981. Operative mortality during the period 1969 to 1975 was 15.6% compared to 5.0% for the years 1976 to 1981 (p less than 0.02). The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) declined over the same period from 14.2% to 2.0% (p less than .01). Functional class and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure significantly influenced mortality, whereas age, sex, duration of symptoms, cardiac index, wall motion abnormality, type of valve lesion, and completeness of revascularization did not. Type of myocardial preservation did not significantly affect operative mortality, although a trend favoring either cardioplegia or continuous perfusion of both coronary ostia and grafts was observed. Life-table analysis shows a survival rate during the 10 year follow-up period equal to that of patients undergoing isolated AVR. Cornary bypass grafting (CABG) returns patients with combined aortic valve (AVD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) to a prognostic curve determined by their valvular disease alone.     

Open-heart surgery in patients more than 65 years old

At the Mayo Clinic from 1968 to 1973, 305 open-heart operations were performed on patients more than 65 years old. The overall operative mortality rate was 15.7%. Of the various types of operations, aortic valve replacement was associated with a mortality of 10.6%; mitral valve replacement, 20.0%; multiple valve replacements, 42.4%; coronary artery grafting, 3.7%; coronary grafting plus valve replacement, 23.1%; and miscellaneous procedures, 8.3%. Advanced disease, inability to achieve good coronary perfusion during operation, intraoperative ventricular fibrillation, postoperative myocardial infarction, and low cardiac output were factors in mortality. Open-heart operations can be done in patients more than 65 years old with an acceptable operative mortality.     

Coronary Artery Stenosis Following Aortic Valve Replacement and Intermittent Intracoronary Cardioplegia

From July, 1977, to July, 1980, intermittent cold blood potassium cardioplegia was used in 208 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Aortic root injection of the cardioplegic solution at 10°C was followed every 20 to 30 minutes by infusions of the solution through Silastic cannulas sutured in the coronary orifices or reinserted with each injection.Symptoms of myocardial ischemia developed in 6 patients 3 to 30 months postoperatively. Coronary angiography confirmed new stenoses of the left orifice (3 patients), left main trunk (1 patient), left anterior descending coronary artery (2 patients), circumflex coronary artery (1 patient), and right orifice (3 patients). Four patients underwent saphenous vein grafting procedures, with 2 deaths; 2 patients refused reoperation. A seventh patient with 80% stenosis of the circumflex coronary artery and a posterolateral myocardial infarction died 2 months after double-valve replacement.Intermittent cold blood potassium cardioplegia instead of continuous perfusion did not prevent coronary arterial injury. Injuries occurred in the distal coronary arteries as well as the orifices and were not prevented by withdrawal of the cannulas between injections. Tight-fitting cannulas and high-pressure injection should be avoided. A careful search for coronary arterial injury should be made in all symptomatic patients following aortic valve replacement.     

Current determinants of operative mortality in 1400 patients requiring aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND: Determinants of operative mortality after aortic valve replacement vary with a changing patient population due to advances in operative management and increasing life expectancy. In order to predict current groups of high risk patients, a statistically valid large study population base recruited over a short period of time is required. METHODS: Between January 1996 and June 2001, 1408 aortic valves were replaced in 1400 patients (572 of them with simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting). The data were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the operative risk. Mean age of the study population was 68 +/- 11 years (range 19 to 90 years old, 44% female). RESULTS: Overall operative mortality (within 30 days) was 3.8%. Independent predictive factors for operative mortality were previous bypass surgery, emergency operation, simultaneous mitral valve replacement, renal dysfunction, more than 80 years old, simultaneous bypass surgery in female patients with a body mass index greater than 29 kg/m(2), and height smaller than 1.57 m for patients more than 71 years old. Simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting in general (p = 0.6), previous aortic valve replacement (p = 0.59), and implantation of stented bioprostheses (p = 0.39) or stentless bioprostheses (p = 0.7) were not identified as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Certain groups of patients with a high operative risk were identified: patients more than 80 years old, women with a body mass index greater 29 kg/m(2) undergoing simultaneous coronary artery bypass surgery, and "small" patients more than 71 years old.     

Preoperative coronary artery bypass grafting in patients undergoing abdominal aortic reconstruction

The effect of preoperative aortocoronary bypass grafting on the operative mortality of patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic reconstruction was examined by reviewing a series of 224 consecutive patients (1980 to 1983) (Group I) in whom selective preoperative noninvasive and invasive cardiac screening was used to identify patients with significant coronary stenoses. One patient died during cardiac catheterization. Twenty-seven patients (12 percent) underwent aortocoronary bypass grafting with one operative death (3.7 percent) and one nonfatal myocardial infarction (3.7 percent). These 26 patients subsequently underwent abdominal aortic reconstruction with no mortality and no postoperative myocardial infarction. One hundred ninety-six patients (88 percent) underwent aortic reconstruction without prior aortocoronary bypass grafting with four operative deaths (2 percent), including two fatal myocardial infarctions. The combined operative mortality for Group I patients was 2.3 percent. Three hundred twenty-six patients (Group II) who underwent abdominal aortic reconstruction at this institution from 1970 to 1976 had an 8 percent operative mortality, of which 50 percent of the deaths were due to myocardial infarctions (Group I versus Group II, p less than 0.01). Selective preoperative screening for coronary artery disease in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic reconstruction with aortocoronary bypass grafting in selected patients is safe and may help reduce the operative mortality.     

Concomitant aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization.

Twenty-six consecutive patients underwent combined aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization at the Emory University Affiliated Hospitals between May, 1973 and March, 1976. Acute myocardial infarction resulted in two operative deaths (8%). There have been four late deaths, all Class IV preoperative. The age range was 37 to 79 years with an average age of 60. Preoperatively all patients were Class IV or late Class III. Twenty-three patients had symptoms of angina pectoris; congestive heart failure was evident in 56%. Postoperatively, 70% are now Class 1 or II. Single coronary bypass was performed in 16 patients, double in 6, and triple in three. Double bypass plus mitral valve replacement was required in two with aneurysmectomy in one. The rate of intraoperative infarction was 27% for the series but only 7% in the last year. The methods of intraoperative myocardial preservation and the technical approach for the operative procedures were variable. Results with each method are correlated, and currently preferred techniques are presented and discussed. Best results were obtained in patients who presented early in their symptomatic course with isolated proximal coronary lesions and good renoff vessels. Excellent results could be achieved despite advanced age of patients, requirement for multiple bypass grafts, and correction of other associated cardiac lesions. Poorest results were obtained when long-standing ventricular failure was combined with poor vessels distal to coronary stenoses.     

Surgical treatment of patients with nonrheumatic aortic valve failure and ischemic heart disease

54 patients aged 65-88 years (mean age 68,4±5,9) were operated during 1994-2009. 50 patients underwent aortic valve replacement combined with coronary bypass grafting, 3 patients underwent aortic and mitral valve replacement combined with bypass grafting. Ascending aorta replacement according to Bentall - de Bono method with coronary bypass grafting was carried out to 1 patient. Aortic root plasty was applied in 4 observations. 106 distal bypasses with coronary bed were formed in 54 patients; myocardial revascularization index amounted 1,9. Hospital mortality amounted 3,7% (2 patients). Causes of lethal outcome were: complex rhythm disturbances, augmenting cardiovascular failure. Low hospital mortality and low amount of complications allow recommending more aggressive approach in establishing indications for operative treatment in this group of patients.     

Myocardial infarction complicating aortic valve replacement.

One hundred consecutive aortic valve replacements were studied. Fifteen patients had a myocardial infarction as a result of the operation, and four of the five deaths in the series stemmed from this group. In the four deaths from infarction, autopsy revealed occlusion of a main coronary artery. This was attributable to coronary perfusion in three instances. All of the 11 survivors who sustained an infarct were free of angina and left ventricular failure 6 weeks after the operation. Patients with infarcts had longer bypass times and larger aortic systolic gradients than the patients who did not have an infarct. It is suggested that an infarct can occur as the result of occlusion of a main coronary artery; this is a fatal event commonly related to trauma from the coronary perfusion cannula. Alternatively, infarction may result from regional ischemia, perhaps without vessel occlusion, and is associated with long bypass times and with large aortic valve gradients. In such cases the prognosis is good. However, myocardial infarction was the major cause of death in this series.     

The safety of combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting

Coexisting aortic valve disease and atherosclerotic coronary artery disease were treated in 27 patients by combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting. There was 1 operative death; 2 late deaths occurred. These results compare favorably with those of either operation performed alone. A modular operative approach was adopted in which each component of the procedure was performed independently in sequence without complicated modifications of proved techniques. Most of the patients have been able to return to full activity following operation. Combined aortic valvular disease and coronary obstruction should be viewed with optimism. With the utilization of proved techniques this combination can be corrected with safety as indicated by operative mortality and short-term follow-up.     

Combined Procedure of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Valve Repair

The safety of combined operative procedures for valvular and coronary artery disease was reviewed in 27 patients. Twelve patients had aortic valve disease and 15 had mitral valve disease. Forty-seven coronary artery reconstructions were performed, an average of 1.7 per patient. Twenty-two patients underwent valve replacement and 5 had valvuloplasty. Congestive heart failure was the major symptom in 20 patients, and angina was the major symptom in 7. Eight of the patients with congestive heart failure had no angina, but significant coronary stenoses were demonstrated at routine coronary angiography.Coronary reconstruction was performed before valve repair. Two patients died postoperatively (a hospital mortality of 7.4%), and there were 4 late deaths from 2 to 28 months postoperatively. There were no postoperative myocardial infarctions.Contrary to previous reports, coronary artery reconstruction and valve repair need not be associated with an increased risk. Protection of the myocardium by coronary perfusion through reconstructed coronary arteries enables valve repair to be done without greater risk than valve repair alone. All patients considered for valve repair should have coronary angiography.     

Aortic arch aneurysm complicated with coronary artery disease: still a surgical challenge?

Recent surgical strategies and outcomes for the simultaneous operation of aortic arch repair (AAR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were reviewed. The surgical treatment of aortic arch aneurysm complicated with coronary artery arteriosclerosis has been a challenge. In spite of recent improvements in cerebral protection during AAR such as deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest with/without retrograde cerebral perfusion, or antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (SCP), additional CABG poses a considerable surgical risk resulting in extremely higher mortality rates when compared with solo AAR. To minimize the cardiac ischemic time, several techniques such as distal coronary artery anastomosis on the perfused fibrillating heart, and coronary artery perfusion through a cardioplegic line during AAR have been employed. Recently, open stent grafting instead of aortic distal anastomosis has been attempted to minimize the cardiopulmonary time and operative complexity. Our recent experience suggested off-pump coronary artery bypass and AAR with the aid of SCP decreased cardiac ischemic time and cardiopulmonary time followed by improved operative morbidity and mortality. Further less-invasive surgical modalities that enhance the adequate myocardial protection and minimize the adverse effect of cardiopulmonary bypass can improve the outcome of this demanding operation for these elderly patients with aortic arch aneurysm and coronary artery occlusive disease.     

Combined valve replacement and myocardial revascularization

Combining valve replacement with coronary artery bypass (CABG) for significant concomitant disease remains a controversial subject. To determine the operative results following combined valve replacement and CABG, we evaluated 201 patients seen consecutively between July 1977 and June 1982. CABG for vessels with greater than 70% stenosis was performed with aortic valve replacement in 106 patients, with mitral valve replacement in 82, and with aortic and mitral valve replacement in 13. There were 143 men and 58 women; the mean age was 67 years. Nine operative deaths (8.5%) occurred with aortic valve replacement and CABG: 5 of 25 (20%) when cardioplegia was not used and 4 of 81 (4.9%) with cardioplegia (p less than 0.01). The operative mortality rate for isolated aortic valve replacement without coronary disease during the same period was 5.9% (10 of 168). The late actuarial survival rate is similar for aortic valve replacement alone or aortic valve replacement and CABG. There were no operative deaths among patients having undergone aortic and mitral valve replacement and CABG; the rate was 15% (9 of 60) in patients having undergone aortic and mitral replacement and CABG. The operative mortality rate was 21.9% for mitral valve replacement and CABG (18 of 82). Rheumatic disease was present in 14 of these patients, two of whom had early deaths (14.3%), both after repeat mitral operations; 11 mitral valve replacements and CABG were done for degenerative mitral regurgitation with no deaths, and the remaining 57 patients had ischemic mitral regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting with in situ arterial grafts for porcelain aorta.

Patients with porcelain aorta carry a high risk of cerebral as well as systemic embolism during cardiac surgery. Here we describe a case of severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease combined with the circumferentially calcified aorta. The patient was a 77-year-old man who successfully received four coronary artery bypass grafts with in situ arterial grafts without clamping the aorta and aortic valve replacement. Aortic valve replacement and two distal coronary artery anastomoses to the left circumflex artery and obtuse marginal branch were performed under cardiac arrest during hypothermic perfusion with endoaortic balloon occlusion, followed by partial endarterectomy and closure of the aorta buttressed with bovine pericardium under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. While rewarming, the other two distal coronary anastomoses to the left anterior descending artery and diagonal branch were done on the beating heart in order to minimize cardiac arrest time. On-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be useful especially for combined complex cardiac surgery.     

Early results of aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting

Early results of aortic valve replacement were reviewed in 962 unselected patients, 659 without concomitant coronary bypass surgery (AVR group) and 303 with combined valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR + CABG). The early (less than 30-day) mortality was 4.6% in the AVR, and 5.9% in the AVR + CABG group. Multivariate analysis showed coronary artery stenoses and NYHA functional class to be independent predictors of early mortality in the AVR group, and the number of distal anastomoses as the strongest predictor in AVR + CABG. The incidence of peroperative technical complications in the cases with fatal outcome was 27% in the AVR and 6% in the AVR + CABG group. The incidence of myocardial injury (new Q wave or evidence of increased enzyme leakage) was 11% in AVR and 21% in AVR + CABG. Independent predictors of postoperative myocardial injury were aortic cross-clamp time, year of surgery, coronary artery stenoses and NYHA class in AVR and aortic cross-clamp time and year of surgery in AVR + CABG. The study suggests that coronary artery disease increases risk in aortic valve replacement with or without CABG. Replacement should be undertaken before endstage of the disease (NYHA IV), with CABG if significant coronary disease is present, and in multivessel disease the number of distal anastomoses should be restricted in order to shorten aortic cross-clamp time.     

Normothermic coronary perfusion during aortic valve replacement.

Normothermic coronary perfusion was used in 121 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement from 1969 to 1976. Isolated aortic valve replacement was performed in 69% of the patients (84/121), and 31% (37/121) had combined procedures consisting of aortocoronary bypass, mitral valve replacement or repair, or ascending aortic aneurysm resection in conjunction with aortic valve replacement. The left ventricle was vented in all. Sinus rhythm was maintained in 105 patients, but spontaneous fibrillation persisted in 16. Postbypass hemodynamic data indicated satisfactory ventricular performance, and postoperative morbidity and mortality were low. Postoperative myocardial infarction (new Q waves, loss of R waves, persistent S-T and T wave changes) or a serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) level of more than 100 units (colorimetric) occurred in 13% of isolated and 27% of combined procedures. In patients with electrocardiographic and SGOT changes suggesting myocardial damage and in those with persistent spontaneous fibrillation, coronary perfusion was technically unsatisfactory owing to either excessive flow, low flow, inability to perfuse the right coronary artery, or high perfusion pressures. Evidence of myocardial damage was absent when coronary perfusion was appropriately applied. In order to obtain satisfactory results with normothermic coronary perfusion, both coronary arteries must be perfused at total flow rates of 200 to 350 ml per minute and at mean pressures of less than 120 mm Hg.     

Mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction. Coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve replacement with chordae preservation.

A patient with acute ischemic mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve replacement with chordae preservation. For severe mitral regurgitation and heart failure due to myocardial infarction and ischemic papillary muscle dysfunction, mitral valve replacement with chordae preservation was effective. Here, we discuss the etiology of ischemic mitral regurgitation and the operative method for valve repair or replacement.