Microsatellite analysis in Turner syndrome: Parental origin of X chromosomes and possible mechanism of formation of abnormal chromosomes

Turner syndrome is a chromosomal disorder in which all or part of one X chromosome is missing. The meiotic or mitotic origin of most cases remains unknown due to the difficulty in detecting hidden mosaicism and to the lack of meiotic segregation studies. We analyzed 15 Turner patients, 10 with a 45,X whereas the rest had a second cell line with abnormal X‐chromosomes: a pseudodicentric, an isochromosome, one large and one small ring, and the last with a long arm deletion. Our aims were: to detect X cryptic mosaicism in patients with a 45,X constitution; to determine the parental origin of the abnormality; to infer the zygotic origin of the karyotype and to suggest the timing and mechanism of the error(s) leading to the formation of abnormal X chromosomes from maternal origin. Molecular investigation did not revealed heterozygosity for any microsatellite, excluding X mosaicism in the 45,X cases. Parental origin of the single X chromosome was maternal in 90% of these patients. Three of the structurally abnormal Xs were maternally derived whereas the other two were paternal. These results allowed us to corroborate breakpoints in these abnormal X chromosomes and suggest that the pseudodicentric chromosome originated from post‐zygotic sister chromatid exchange, whereas the Xq deleted chromosome probably arose after a recombination event during maternal meiosis. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Turner syndrome: a cytogenetic and molecular study

Two hundred and eleven patients with a clinical diagnosis of Turner syndrome were studied. We report (i) the cytogenetic results, (ii) the frequency of cryptic mosaicism and (iii) the parental age and the parental origin of the abnormality. We scored 100 cells from blood cultures and found 97 patients to have a 45,X constitution, 15 to be 45,X/46,XX or 45,X/47,XXX mosaics, 86 to have a structurally abnormal X and 13 to have a structurally abnormal Y chromosome. Molecular methods were used to look for cryptic X and Y chromosome mosaicism in patients with a 45,X constitution. Two cryptic X but no cryptic Y mosaics were detected. In 74% of the 45,X patients the X was maternal in origin. The i(Xq)s were approximately equally likely to involve the paternal or maternal chromosome, while the majority of deletions and rings and virtually all the abnormal Y chromosomes were paternal in origin. We suggest that the preponderance of paternal errors in Turner syndrome may result from the absence of pairing along the greater part of the XY bivalent during paternal mei I, which may make the sex chromosomes particularly susceptible to both structural and non-disjunctional errors during male gametogenesis.     

Parental origin of normal X chromosomes in Turner syndrome patients with various karyotypes: implications for the mechanism leading to generation of a 45,X karyotype

The parental origin of the X chromosome of 45,X females has been the subject of many studies, and most of them have shown that the majority (60-80%) of the X chromosomes are maternal in origin. However, studies on the parental origin of normal X chromosomes are relatively limited for Turner syndrome (TS) females with sex chromosome aberrations. In this study, we used PCR-based typing of highly polymorphic markers and an assay of methylation status of the androgen receptor gene to determine the parental origin of normal X chromosomes in 50 unbiased TS females with a variety of karyotypes. Our results showed a higher paternal meiotic error rate leading to the generation of abnormal sex chromosomes, especially in the case of del(Xp) and abnormal Y chromosomes. Isochromosome Xq and ring/marker X chromosomes, on the other hand, were equally likely the result of both maternal and paternal meiotic errors. A thorough review of previous results, together with our data suggests, that the majority of TS karyotype are caused by paternal meiotic errors that generate abnormal sex chromosomes, and that most 45,X cells are generated by mitotic loss of these abnormal sex chromosomes, resulting in maternal X dominance in these cells.     

A molecular and FISH analysis of structurally abnormal Y chromosomes in patients with Turner syndrome

Fourteen patients with Turner syndrome and a structurally abnormal Y chromosome were analysed by PCR amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridisation for the presence of sequences specific to defined regions of the Y chromosome. Thirteen patients had a mosaic karyotype including a 45,X cell line and one case was non-mosaic in cultured lymphocytes. Ten patients had a pseudodicentric Yp chromosome, two an isodicentric Yq, one a pseudodicentric Yq, and one a derived Y chromosome. Two of the patients with a psu dic(Yp) chromosome had complex karyotypes with more than two cell lines, one of which exhibited five morphologically distinct mar(Y) chromosomes, presumably derived from a progenitor psu dic(Yp). Nine of the ten psu dic(Yp) chromosomes were positive for all Yp and Yq probes used except DYZ1 which maps to Yq12, suggesting a common breakpoint near the Yq euchromatin/heterochromatin boundary. In the three patients with a dicentric Yq chromosome two different breakpoints were observed; in two it was between PABY and the subtelomeric repeat sequence and in one it was between DYZ5 and AMGY in proximal Yp. Our results suggest that the great majority of structurally abnormal Y chromosomes found in Turner syndrome mosaics contain two copies of virtually all of the functional Y chromosome euchromatin.     

Minute supernumerary marker chromosomes identified in two patients with a related, larger pseudodicentric chromosome.

We describe two cases in which a minute supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) was identified in addition to a larger pseudodicentric chromosome. Case 1, a phenotypically normal male, had mosaicism for a psu dic(15;15)(q11.2;q11.2) chromosome and a minute SMC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed that the minute SMC was D15Z1 positive, indicating a chromosome 15 origin. Case 2 was a 22-week fetus with mosaicism for a normal and two abnormal cell lines: one had a psu dic (22;22)(q11.2;q11.2) chromosome containing euchromatin, usually associated with cat eye syndrome; the other a minute SMC. The minute SMC was positive with the D14Z1/D22Z1 alpha-satellite probe, indicating a chromosome 14 or chromosome 22 origin. Deletion of centromeric material was proposed as one mechanism of centromere inactivation in dicentric chromosomes. The origin of these two minute SMC suggests that they were derived from one of the centromeres of the larger pseudodicentric chromosome. These stable minute SMC may be the by-product of a deletion event inactivating one centromere of a dicentric chromosome to generate a pseudodicentric chromosome. Alternatively, the minute SMC may originate from further rearrangement of the larger pseudodicentric chromosome. These cases suggest possible mechanisms for the origin of minute SMC.     

Minute supernumerary marker chromosomes identified in two patients with a related,larger pseudodicentric chromosome*

We describe two cases in which a minute supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) was identified in addition to a larger pseudodicentric chromosome. Case 1, a phenotypically normal male, had mosaicism for a psu dic(15;15)(q11.2;q11.2) chromosome and a minute SMC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed that the minute SMC was D15Z1 positive, indicating a chromosome 15 origin. Case 2 was a 22‐week fetus with mosaicism for a normal and two abnormal cell lines: one had a psu dic (22;22)(q11.2;q11.2) chromosome containing euchromatin, usually associated with cat eye syndrome; the other a minute SMC. The minute SMC was positive with the D14Z1/D22Z1 α‐satellite probe, indicating a chromosome 14 or chromosome 22 origin. Deletion of centromeric material was proposed as one mechanism of centromere inactivation in dicentric chromosomes. The origin of these two minute SMC suggests that they were derived from one of the centromeres of the larger pseudodicentric chromosome. These stable minute SMC may be the by‐product of a deletion event inactivating one centromere of a dicentric chromosome to generate a pseudodicentric chromosome. Alternatively, the minute SMC may originate from further rearrangement of the larger pseudodicentric chromosome. These cases suggest possible mechanisms for the origin of minute SMC. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

PCR-PRINS-FISH analysis of structurally abnormal sex chromosomes in eight patients with Turner phenotype

According to cytogenetic analysis, about 50% of Turner individuals are 45,X. The remaining cases have a structurally abnormal X chromosome or are mosaics with a second cell line containing a normal or abnormal sex chromosome. In these mosaics, approximately 20% have a sex marker chromosome whose identity cannot usually be determined by classical cytogenetic methods, requiring the use of molecular techniques. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), primed in situ labeling (PRINS), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were performed in 8 patients with Turner syndrome and 45,X mosaic karyotypes to determine the origin and structure of the marker chromosome in the second cell line. Our data showed that markers were Y-derived in 2 patients and X-derived in the remaining 6 patients. We were also able to determine the breakpoints in the two Y chromosomes. The use of cytogenetic and molecular techniques allowed us to establish unequivocally the origin, X or Y, of the marker chromosomes in the 8 patients with Turner phenotype. This study illustrates the power of resolution and utility of combined cytogenetic and molecular approaches in some clinical cases.     

FISH技术在一例45,X/46,X,i（Xq）Turner综合征中的研究

目的应用荧光原位杂交技术（fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH）分析一例45,X/46,X,i（Xq）嵌合体,并探讨其形成机理,临床表型与染色体核型的关系。方法通过染色体常规G显带技术,并联合FISH技术,选用X染色体着丝粒特异DNA探针（CSPX）和X染色体长臂全涂抹探针（Xq）,进一步确认异常染色体的来源。结果 G显带分析该患者染色体核型为45,X/46,X,i（Xq）,FISH技术证实了该异常染色体为Xq等臂染色体。结论 X短臂单体长臂三体型Turner综合征患者的临床表型与其染色体核型相关;在常规G显带的基础上,应用FISH技术可准确识别异常染色体,对明确诊断及后续治疗有指导意义。     

Paternal sex chromosome aneuploidy as a possible origin of Turner syndrome in monozygotic twins: case report.

The meiotic or mitotic origin of most cases of Turner syndrome remains unknown, due to the difficulty in detecting hidden mosaicisms and to the lack of meiotic segregation studies. We have had the opportunity to study one pair of monozygotic twins concordant for Turner syndrome of paternal origin. The paternal origin of the single X chromosome was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. No mosaicism was detected for the X or Y chromosome. In this case, a meiotic error during gametogenesis would be a likely origin of X monosomy. To determine if meiotic errors are more frequent in the father of these monozygotic twins concordant for Turner syndrome of paternal origin, molecular studies in spermatozoa were conducted to analyse sex chromosome numerical abnormalities. A total of 12520 sperm nuclei from the twins' father and 85338 sperm nuclei from eight normal donors were analysed using three-colour fluorescent in-situ hybridization. There were significant differences between the twins' father and control donors for XY disomy (0.22 versus 0.11%, P < 0.001) and total sex chromosome disomy (0.38 versus 0.21%, P < 0.001). These results could indicate an increased tendency to meiotic sex chromosome non-disjunction in the father of the Turner twins.     

A cytogenetic and molecular reappraisal of a series of patients with Turner's syndrome

The results of a cytogenetic and molecular reinvestigation of a series of 52 patients with Turner's syndrome are reported. No evidence of Y chromosome material was found among the patients with a 45, X constitution but two patients were found to have a cell line with a r(Y) chromosome which was previously thought to be a r(X). The parental origin of the single X in the 45, X patients was maternal in 69% and paternal in 31%, a similar ratio to that seen among spontaneously aborted 45, X conceptuses. This suggests that X-chromosome imprinting is not responsible for the two grossly different phenotypes associated with a 45, X chromosome constitution. Approximately half of the structurally abnormal X chromosomes were maternal in origin and half paternal. This observation is consistent with either a meiotic or post-zygotic mitotic origin and at variance with the predominantly paternal origin reported for autosome structural abnormalities.     

Uniparental and functional X disomy in Turner syndrome patients with unexplained mental retardation and X derived marker chromosomes.

We analysed parental origin and X inactivation status of X derived marker (mar(X)) or ring X (r(X)) chromosomes in six Turner syndrome patients. Two of these patients had mental retardation of unknown cause in addition to the usual Turner syndrome phenotype. By FISH analysis, the mar(X)/r(X) chromosomes of all patients retained the X centromere and the XIST locus at Xq13.2. By polymorphic marker analysis, both patients with mental retardation were shown to have uniparental X disomy while the others had both a maternal and paternal contribution of X chromosomes. By RT-PCR analysis and the androgen receptor assay, it was shown that in one of these mentally retarded patients, the XIST on the mar(X) was not transcribed and consequently the mar(X) was not inactivated, leading to functional disomy X. In the other patient, the XIST was transcribed but the r(X) appeared to be active by the androgen receptor assay. Our results suggest that uniparental disomy X may not be uncommon in mentally retarded patients with Turner syndrome. Functional disomy X seems to be the cause of mental retardation in these patients, although the underlying molecular basis could be diverse. In addition, even without unusual dysmorphic features, Turner syndrome patients with unexplained mental retardation need to be investigated for possible mosaicism including these mar(X)/r(X) chromosomes.     

Frequency of meiotic trisomy depends on involved chromosome and mode of ascertainment

Although maternal meiotic errors predominate in most studies of nonmosaic trisomy, studies of trisomy ascertained through confined placental mosaicism (CPM) have shown a high rate of somatic errors. However, origin of trisomy of many of the chromosomes involved in CPM has not been evaluated previously in cases ascertained through spontaneous abortions (SAs). Therefore, it was impossible to determine if the relative lack of meiotic errors in trisomy-CPM cases was a characteristic of the specific chromosome involved or due simply to ascertainment through a mosaic state. In the present study, parental and meiotic/somatic stages of origin of trisomy were determined in 89 SAs involving trisomy of chromosomes 2, 4 to 10, 12, 15, 17, and 20. Comparisons were then made to origin of trisomy in cases of confined and generalized trisomy mosaicism. Although somatic errors are generally more common in mosaic cases, this depends on the specific chromosome involved. The results suggest that there are chromosome-specific differences in the relative frequency of somatic chromosome gain or loss and/or the ability of an early somatic loss of one chromosome from a trisomic conceptus to "rescue" the pregnancy. As mean maternal age was less in the somatic than meiotic origin cases (P < 0.01), the age distribution of the study population should also influence the probability of detecting a somatic error. No phenotypic differences were apparent when cases were subdivided based on either parent or stage of origin of the trisomy.     

Are the occasional aneuploid cells in peripheral blood cultures significant?

Cytogenetic results of 1,500 consecutive clinical cases from a young population were analyzed for rare cells with hypermodality (greater than or equal to 47 chromosomes) or hypomodality (less than or equal to 45 chromosomes). Such instances of non-modal chromosome gains or losses were random relative to referral diagnosis or modal karyotype. However, chromosome loss was correlated with size, smaller chromosomes being lost more frequently (correlation coefficient = 0.794). Sex chromosome gain or loss in vitro was of particular interest since mosaicism in vivo is frequently found in patients presenting with manifestations of Turner or Klinefelter syndrome. Cases with a referral diagnosis of sex chromosome abnormality showed no increased gain or loss of an X or Y chromosome when compared to other types of clinical cases. Our analyses suggest that when one non-modal cell is found with a gain or loss of a chromosome relevant to the referral diagnosis, then the results on a count of 40 cells should differentiate in vitro artifact from probable in vivo mosaicism with 95% degree of confidence.     

Turner phenotype in a girl with a 45,X/46,XX/47,XX,+18 mosaicism

We report a girl with Turner syndrome phenotype, whose karyotype on amniocyte culture was 45,X, while cytogenetic analysis on peripheral blood lymphocytes showed the presence of a mosaic chromosome constitution with three different cell lines: 45,X[5]/46,XX[3]/47,XX,+18 [35]. No signs of trisomy 18 were observed and a follow up during childhood revealed normal psychomotor development. Parental origin and mechanism of formation were studied using high polymorphic microsatellites and Quantitative Fluorescent PCR. The 18-trisomic cells showed one paternal allele and two maternal homozygous alleles at different loci of chromosome 18, suggesting a maternal M-II meiotic or a postzygotic error. A biparental origin of the X-alleles in the trisomic cells were determined, being the paternal allele retained in the 45,X cells. The possible mechanism of formation implying meiotic and/or mitotic errors is discussed.     

Three patients with a 45,X/46,X,psu dic(Xp) karyotype.

Few cases of isochromosomes for the short arm of the X have been reported and all are dicentric with variable portions of the long arms interposed between the two centromeres. This paper reports three cases of complete short arm duplication of one X chromosome in unrelated female patients. All patients also have a 45,X cell line and present with some characteristic features of Turner syndrome. We used conventional cytogenetics, in situ hybridisation, and molecular genetics to describe all three structurally abnormal chromosomes and the parental origin of two of them. We briefly discuss the "inactivation enhancement" theory; however, any genotype-phenotype correlation is complicated by the presence of the 45,X cell line.     

Frequency of Y chromosomal material in Mexican patients with Ullrich-Turner syndrome

Cytogenetic studies have shown that 40–60% of patients with Ullrich-Turner syndrome (UTS) are 45,X, whereas the rest have structural aberrations of the X chromosome or mosaicism with a second cell line containing a structurally normal or abnormal X or Y chromosome. However, molecular analysis has demonstrated a higher proportion of mosaicism, and studies in different populations have shown an extremely variable frequency of Y mosaicism of 0–61%. We used Southern blot analysis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the presence of Ycen, ZFY, SRY, and Yqh in 50 Mexican patients with UTS and different karyotypes to determine the origin of marker chromosomes and the presence of Y sequences. Our results indicated the origin of the marker chromosome in 1 patient and detected the presence of Y sequences in 4 45,X patients. Taken together, we found a 12% incidence of Y sequences in individuals with UTS. The amount of Y-derived material was variable, making the correlation between phenotype and molecular data difficult. Only 1 patient had a gonadoblastoma. We discuss the presence of Y chromosomes or Y sequences in patients with UTS and compare our frequency with that previously reported. Am. J. Med. Genet. 76:120–124, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Ring-X chromosomes: their cognitive and behavioural phenotype

We tested the cognitive abilities and educational attainments of 47 patients with a ring X chromosome, to evaluate the extent to which these variables correlated with failure of r(X) inactivation and with mosaicism. We found possession of a r(X) chromosome was associated with an increased risk of significant learning difficulties, and with associated behavioural maladjustment, compared with 45,X Turner females. Nearly a third had been educated outside mainstream schools. The proportion of cells in peripheral blood containing an inactivated r(X) chromosome was negatively correlated with nonverbal IQ. The parental origin of the normal chromosome did not appear to affect adjustment or abilities. In a minority of r(X) cases associated with mental retardation, there had been a failure to inactivate the ring, due to loss of the XIST locus. However, failure of X-inactivation was not necessarily associated with a severe phenotype. The degree of impairment in IQ depended on the size of the active ring, and hence was proportionate to the number of (as yet unidentified) genes whose functional disomy affected brain development and functioning.     

Mosaic paternal uniparental (iso)disomy for chromosome 20 associated with multiple anomalies

Uniparental disomy for a number of human chromosomes is associated with clinical abnormalities. We report a child with a complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosome 20 (45,XY,psu dic (20;20)(p13;p13)) and paternal uniparental isodisomy for chromosome 20 in peripheral blood and bone marrow. This patient had multiple congenital abnormalities including microtia/anotia, micrencephaly, congenital heart disease, neuronal subependymal heterotopias, and colonic agangliosis. Molecular studies on DNA from peripheral blood demonstrated paternal uniparental inheritance of chromosome 20. However, fibroblasts demonstrated a mosaic karyotype, with one cell line having 45 chromosomes, including the pseudodicentric chromosome 20 (75% of cells), and a second cell line having 46 chromosomes, including the pseudodicentric chromosome 20, and a normal chromosome 20 (trisomy 20) (25% of cells). FISH experiments using a sub-telomeric probe that maps approximately 120 kb from the 20p telomere, showed that both copies of these sequences were present on the rearranged chromosome, consistent with deletion of a very small interval. This leads us to suggest that in addition to trisomy 20 mosaicism, paternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 20 could contribute to his clinical phenotype.     

Meiotic origin of two ring chromosomes 18 in a girl with developmental delay

We report on the cytogenetic, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and molecular results obtained for a patient with a mild and nonspecific pattern of minor anomalies and developmental delay. In the proband's karyotype one chromosome 18 was replaced by a ring chromosome 18 in all metaphases, with deletion of the terminal regions. Furthermore, 56% of the metaphases contained a supernumerary small ring chromosome. Microdissection followed by FISH analysis demonstrated that the small ring chromosome consisted of material from the pericentromeric region of chromosome 18. The karyotype was defined as 46,XX,r(18)(p11.3q23)[88]/47,XX,r(18)(p11.3q23)+r(18)(p11.22q12.2)[112]. Thus, the patient has a deletion at 18pter and at 18qter, and a mosaic partial trisomy of the pericentromeric region of chromosome 18. We undertook molecular analysis using DNA samples of the patient and her parents in order to clarify the origin and possible mode of formation of the chromosome abnormalities. Our results show a paternal origin of the structurally normal chromosome 18 and a maternal origin for both ring chromosomes 18. Interestingly, the smaller ring chromosome did not arise postzygotically from the larger ring, since the two ring chromosomes contain genetic material derived from the two different maternal chromosomes 18. The abnormalities appear to have arisen during a meiotic division, and it could be speculated that both ring chromosomes 18 arose simultaneously due to complex pairing and recombination events. After fertilization, the small ring chromosome was lost in a subset of cells, thus leading to mosaicism.     

Detection of low level sex chromosome mosaicism in Ullrich-Turner syndrome patients

Ullrich-Turner syndrome (UTS) is most commonly due to a 45,X chromosome defect, but is also seen in patients with a variety of X-chromosome abnormalities or 45,X/46,XY mosaicism. The phenotype of UTS patients is highly variable, and depends largely on the karyotype. Patients are at an increased risk of gonadoblastoma when a Y-derived chromosome or chromosome fragment is present. Since constitutional mosaicism is present in approximately 50% of UTS patients, the identification of minor cell populations is clinically important and a challenge to laboratories. We identified 50 females with a 45,X karyotype as the sole abnormality or as part of a more complex karyotype. Twenty two (44%) had a 45,X karyotype; mosaicism for a second normal or structurally abnormal X was observed in 24 (48%) samples, and mosaicism for Y chromosomal material in 4 (8%) cases. To further investigate the possibility of mosaicism in the 22 patients with an apparently non-mosaic 45,X karyotype, we performed FISH using centromere probes for the X and Y chromosomes. A minor XX cell line was identified in 3 patients, and the 45,X result was confirmed in 19 samples. No samples with XY mosaicism were identified. We describe our validation process for a FISH assay to be used in clinical practice to identify XX or XY mosaicism. FISH as an adjunct to karyotype analysis provides a sensitive and cost-effective technique to identify sex chromosome mosaicism in UTS patients.