Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertension. Part III. Reversibility of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy During Treatment With Antihypertensive Drugs

Results of prospective trials of effects of various antihypertensive drugs on left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertensive disease are reviewed. According to 2 meta-analyses angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are most effective inducers of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. However in comparative randomized trials in patients with hypertension ability of diuretics, lipophilic beta-adrenoblockers, long-acting calcium antagonists, and angiotensin receptor blockers to cause regression of left ventricular hypertrophy was not inferior to that of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.     

The heart (ventricle and atrium) is the heart of hypertension, not blood pressure

Some old icons of hypertension warrant questioning in view of new insights. Lowering of blood pressure is no criterion of efficacy in prevention of cardiovascular morbidity, mortality and sudden death. The drugs used in early studies - diuretics, vasodilators and reserpine - greatly improved mortality from malignant hypertension, apoplectic stroke and congestive heart failure, but had little or no effect in persons with milder degrees of elevated blood pressure, who constitute the vast majority of hypertensives. The failure of diuretics and vasodilators to influence cardiovascular disease favorably appears due not to their known adverse effects on risk factors, such as lipids, as some have held, but to a failure - in conjunction with some sympathetic blocking agents - to cause effective regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, the keystone of successful therapy. A study of 674 hypertensive persons surveyed in the United States and eastern Canada, personally examined during their visit to a Florida health resort, has shown striking changes in prescribing practice during the period surveyed (1985-88), notably with increased use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and, to a lesser degree, increased use of calcium channel blockers. Both of these cause regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and will hopefully show long term benefit in decreasing hypertension mortality. Left ventricular hypertrophy is detected most sensitively echocardiographically, and is worthwhile not only for estimation of prognosis, but also for guiding therapy. Left atrial hypertrophy is a mirror of left ventricular hypertrophy and may be detected echocardiographically and in the electrocardiogram.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Behandlung der Hypertonie bei Adipositas

BACKGROUND: Hypertension and obesity are common medical conditions independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Many large epidemiological studies have demonstrated associations between body mass index and blood pressure, and there is evidence to suggest, that obesity is a causal factor in the development of hypertension in obese subjects. Weight Reduction and maintenance is an essential first step in the treatment of obesity-associated hypertension. Weight reduction may be achieved by behavior modification, diet, and exercise or by the use of anti-obesity medication. However, the long-term outcomes of weight management programs for obesity are generally poor, and most hypertensive patients will require antihypertensive drug therapy. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY: Obese hypertensive patients often have metabolic abnormalities known to be exacerbated by commonly used antihypertensive agents but also obesity per se is often associated with endorgan damage including left ventricular hypertrophy, glomerular hyperfiltration and microalbuminuria, congestive heart failure or sudden cardiac death. Furthermore they have revealed volume expansion, increased cardiac output, and lower total peripheral resistance than lean patients. Hypertension in obese patients appears to be related to both increased sympathetic nervous system activity and activation of the renin-angiotensin system. Where antihypertensive therapy is necessary, the aim should be to use agents based on the hemodynamic and metabolic background and that have benefits beyond blood pressure lowering and improve the conditions most commonly linked with obesity-associated hypertension, such as hyperlipidaemia, Type II diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary artery disease, or congestive heart failure. PHARMACOTHERAPY: Based on their favorable metabolic profiles, it would appear that ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, moxonidine and alpha-blockers can lower blood pressure without worsening the metabolic abnormalities, that is just one aspect of the problem. Yet, most guidelines fail to provide specific advice on the pharmacological management of hypertension in obese patients. This may be due to the fact that there are currently no studies that have addressed the efficacy of specific antihypertensive agents in reducing mortality in obese-hypertensive patients. This paper reviews the theoretical reasons for the differential use of the major classes of antihypertensive agents in the pharmacological management of obesity-related hypertension and also considers the potential role of anti-obesity agents.     

Hypertension and sudden death. Disparate effects of calcium entry blocker and diuretic therapy on cardiac dysrhythmias

This study was designed to evaluate the impact of antihypertensive therapy on cardiac dysrhythmias in 13 hypertensive patients who received calcium entry blockers and in 10 hypertensive patients who received hydrochlorothiazide. Mean arterial pressure fell to a similar extent in both treatment groups; however, left ventricular mass index decreased (from 102 +/- 4 to 95 +/- 2 g/m2) only in patients receiving calcium entry blockers, but not in those taking hydrochlorothiazide. The prevalence of premature ventricular contractions decreased 74% from 21 +/- 14/h to 5.7 +/- 6/h in the calcium entry blocker group, but did not change in the hydrochlorothiazide group (15 +/- 17/h to 16 +/- 13/h). Couplets, multiform contractions, ventricular tachycardia, and supraventricular tachycardia were completely abolished after calcium entry blocker therapy, whereas the prevalence of these arrhythmias remained unchanged during treatment with hydrochlorothiazide. We conclude that antihypertensive therapy with calcium entry blockers (but not with thiazide diuretics) reduces left ventricular mass and the prevalence and severity of ventricular dysrhythmias. Whether this reduction will improve the ominous prognosis of left ventricular hypertrophy and diminish the risk of sudden death remains unknown.     

Hochdruck und Herz

Arterial hypertension often leads to diseases of kidneys, vessels and brain. Besides these end organ damages the changes of the heart are of important role. Substantial consequences of hypertension are microangiopathy, interstitial fibrosis and left ventricular hypertrophy. Hence, as an early stage diastolic dysfunction results. Due to longer persistent hypertension also systolic dysfunction develops. Clinically, patients suffer from angina pectoris, dyspnoea and cardiac arrhythmias (i.e. atrial arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation). The left ventricular hypertrophy also is associated with an increased risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The risk of sudden cardiac death is raised as well, in particular in patients with dilated heart and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Well controlled antihypertensive therapy could lead to a regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Hence, disorders and prognosis of the patients could be improved.     

Heart rate variability in left ventricular hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND--Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and strain are associated with increased cardiac morbidity and mortality. Impaired cardiac autonomic function, assessed non-invasively by spontaneous heart rate variability on Holter monitoring, is associated with an increased risk of sudden death after myocardial infarction. AIM--To study the effect of left ventricular hypertrophy on heart rate variability. PATIENTS--36 controls and 154 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (94 with hypertension and 60 with aortic valve disease). SETTING--Tertiary referral centre. METHODS--Heart rate variability was measured on 24 h Holter recordings by non-spectral methods. Left ventricular mass index and fractional shortening were measured by echocardiography. RESULTS--Patients with left ventricular hypertrophy had a higher left ventricular mass index (P < 0.001) and reduced heart rate variability (P < 0.001) compared with those of the controls. A continuous inverse relation was apparent between heart rate variability and left ventricular mass index (r = -0.478, P < 0.001). Heart rate variability was not affected by age, the presence of coronary artery disease in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, or beta blocker treatment for hypertension. Multivariate analysis showed that left ventricular mass index is the most important determinant of heart rate variability. CONCLUSION--Heart rate variability is significantly reduced in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy secondary to hypertension or aortic valve disease. A continuous inverse relation exists between heart rate variability and left ventricular mass index. Impaired cardiac autonomic function in left ventricular hypertrophy may contribute to the mechanism of sudden death.     

Summary of randomized trials of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of death, worsening heart failure and recurrent infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. They have also been shown to reduce mortality in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. They have been demonstrated to reduce major vascular events and progression of renal disease in diabetes with hypertension, compared to placebo and to calcium channel blockers. Current trials are evaluating their role in preventing major vascular events in patients with coronary artery disease, strokes and Type II diabetes who are normotensive.     

Is ventricular wall stress rather than left ventricular hypertrophy an important contributory factor to sudden cardiac death?

Sudden cardiac death comprises a significant proportion of cardiac mortality in Western society. Left ventricular hypertrophy has been identified by many authors as a possible risk factor for sudden cardiac death, however, left ventricular hypertrophy develops in response to external stimuli on the heart as a means of normalizing wall stress. It is possible that the fundamental abnormalities in wall stress, rather than the left ventricular hypertrophy itself, pose the increased risk of sudden death. Left ventricular hypertrophy, the consequence of raised wall stress, is easy to measure and easy to study and it is understandable why this parameter should have received more attention. Wall stress by contrast is difficult to measure, and worse, is variable throughout the ventricle so that it cannot be measured in a single quantifiable figure. As a consequence, only a limited amount of attention has been paid to wall stress as a possible trigger mechanism for cardiac arrhythmia. However, there is evidence from both basic and clinical research to suggest that raised wall stress may be a risk factor for sudden cardiac death and cardiac arrhythmia. This review discusses the evidence for and against left ventricular hypertrophy and wall stress as risk factors for sudden cardiac death, and also presents recent evidence that left ventricular hypertrophy in isolation can protect the heart against the arrhythmogenic effects of raised wall stress.     

Diastolic dysfunction

Opinion statement Heart failure is a leading cause of hospital admissions in North America. Approximately half of patients with symptoms of heart failure have normal or minimally impaired systolic function and are therefore diagnosed, by exclusion, with diastolic dysfunction. The therapy of diastolic dysfunction to date is largely unsatisfactory. There have been few outcome-based clinical trials to guide clinicians, and most treatments have been empirically derived from the data from systolic heart failure studies. In general, acute management consists of central volume reduction with loop diuretics and long-acting nitrates. In some cases improvement in left ventricular filling can be achieved by reducing heart rate, usually with either β blockers or calcium channel blockers. The role of digoxin is unclear and it should be used with caution. Theoretically, it has the capacity to further impair ventricular function, but one of the few trials in diastolic heart failure suggested that it improves symptoms and reduces hospitalization. Renin-angiotensin system blockade is a very attractive therapeutic avenue; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers effectively reduce afterload, induce regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in excess of their blood pressure-lowering effect, and confer survival benefits to patients at high risk for cardiovascular death. Although the results of a recent trial using an angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with primarily diastolic heart failure were unimpressive, renin-angiotensin system blockade should still be considered because of its aforementioned benefits. The long-term management of these patients includes a careful assessment for and treatment of myocardial ischemia, treatment of hypertension, and reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy. For the treatment of ischemia, long-acting nitrates and calcium channel blockers may be particularly useful. The results of new trials in this area are expected soon, and hopefully therapy that directly targets the pathophysiologic pathways of this important disease is on the horizon.     

Summary of Randomized Trials of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of death, worsening heart failure and recurrent infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. They have also been shown to reduce mortality in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. They have been demonstrated to reduce major vascular events and progression of renal disease in diabetes with hypertension, compared to placebo and to calcium channel blockers. Current trials are evaluating their role in preventing major vascular events in patients with coronary artery disease, strokes and Type II diabetes who are normotensive.     

Mechanism of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker action in the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy

Left ventricular hypertrophy refers to a pathologic increase in left ventricular mass and is associated with an increased risk of subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality from any cause. In the development of left ventricular hypertrophy there is growth of cardiomyocytes and accumulation of extracellular matrix and fibrosis. The actions are partly induced by angiotensin II, the principal effector of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, binding to the AT1 receptor. Biochemical markers, some implicated in inflammatory changes, correlate with changes in left ventricular mass. The reduction in left ventricular mass brought about with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy correlates with a reduction in these inflammatory changes, monitored by brain natriuretic peptide. Recent studies incorporating trials of ARBs have found ARBs to be more effective in reducing left ventricular mass than beta blockers and possibly more effective than calcium antagonists. Initial studies suggest that ARBs and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may have similar effects in terms of reducing left ventricular hypertrophy, and the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and ARBs is thought to be synergistic due to a more complete inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. In conclusion, these agents are efficacious in antihypertensive therapy and can play an important role in the prevention or regression of left ventricular hypertrophy due to hypertension.     

Treatment of the Elderly Post-Myocardial Infarction Patient

Coronary risk factors should be modified in older persons after myocardial infarction (MI). Aspirin 160–325 mg daily and β blockers should be administered indefinitely. Anticoagulants should be administered post-MI to patients unable to tolerate daily aspirin, to those with persistent atrial fibrillation, and to those with left ventricular thrombus. Nitrates, along with βblockers, should be used to treat angina pectoris. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors should be administered after MI to patients who have congestive heart failure, an anterior MI, or a left ventricular ejection fraction of =40%. There are no class I indications for the use of calcium channel blockers after MI. Complex ventricular arrhythmias should be treated with βblockers. Persons with life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation or who are at very high risk for sudden cardiac death after MI should receive an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. There are no class I indications for the use of hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women after MI. Indications for coronary revascularization after MI in older individuals are prolongation of life and relief of unacceptable symptoms despite optimal medical management.     

Cardiac involvement in hypertension

Despite improved patient detection and pharmacologic therapy, the effect of treatment of hypertension on mortality from coronary artery-related events remains unresolved. Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, a known consequence of hypertension, is associated with an excess mortality independent of other known cardiovascular risk factors. Recently, LV hypertrophy accompanying hypertension has been associated with ominous ventricular arrhythmias. However, it does not necessarily follow that regression of LV hypertrophy will reduce this increased mortality. Diastolic dysfunction, manifested by reduced ventricular distensibility of the hypertrophying left ventricle, appears to be an early characteristic of the hypertensive heart since echocardiographic techniques have demonstrated diastolic filling abnormalities in untreated essential hypertensives even before significant LV hypertrophy appears. Not all antihypertensive agents diminish LV mass and improve diastolic dysfunction. Certain sympatholytic agents, calcium antagonists, β-adrenergic blockers, and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors appear to diminish LV hypertrophy. However, future studies are needed to determine if these agents that appear to reverse findings of LV hypertrophy and improve diastolic dysfunction will also reduce risk of coronary artery disease and related events.     

Ventricular Hypertrophy and Hypertension

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a strong, independent predictor of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Patients with LVH are at increased risk for stroke, coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Hypertension is a major influence on the development of LVH. The prognostic power of LVH is likely multifactorial. LVH represents both a manifestation of the effects of hypertension and other cardiac risk factors over time as well as an intrinsic condition causing pathologic changes in cardiac structure and function. Angiotensin II plays a central role in the development of LVH. Several antihypertensive treatments, especially angiotensin II receptor blockers, can reverse LVH and improve cardiovascular outcomes independent of blood pressure reduction. Further studies are required to determine if these agents should become first-line therapy for all patients with hypertension and LVH.     

Hypertrophy of left ventricular myocardium as modifiable risk factor: novel possibilities of correction

Hypertrophy of left ventricular myocardium observed in 15-20% of patients with arterial hypertension is an independent factor which elevates considerably risk of complications of hypertension (ischemic heart disease, chronic heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias). Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) at the background of hypotensive therapy is associated with additional lowering of cardiovascular risk. This should be taken into consideration in selection of a hypotensive preparation. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) are believed to have most pronounced ability to cause reverse development of LVH. It has been shown in recently finished PIXEL trial that administration of fixed combination of ACEI perindopril and diuretic indapamide reduced LVH more effectively than monotherapy with high doses of ACEI enalapril and provided better blood pressure control. Therefore in a patient with hypertension and LVH it is expedient to consider combined therapy with ACEI and diuretic including use of their fixed combinations as treatment of choice.     

Vascular selective calcium entry blockers in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders: Focus on felodipine

Summary Calcium entry through L-type calcium channels is essential for contraction of both arterial smooth muscle and the myocardium, and is important in cardiac conduction. First-generation calcium entry blockers lack or have a modest degree of vascular selectivity and inhibit cardiac function at doses producing therapeutic arterial dilatation. Such agents may cause deterioration in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, and their combination with a beta-adrenergic blocker may adversely affect cardiac contractility and conduction. Development of newer agents has focused on obtaining a higher degree of vascular selectivity. Felodipine is a highly vascular selective calcium entry blocker, with a vascular selectivity ratio greater than 100, as shown experimentally. Isradipine and nicardipine are also vascularly selective calcium entry blockers. Hemodynamic studies in patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, or in patients receiving beta-adrenergic blockade, show that felodipine can produce profound arteriolar dilatation without the negative effects of left ventricular systolic performance. Furthermore, felodipine alone or when added to a beta-adrenergic blocker does not interfere with cardiac conduction. The primary mechanism that accounts for the efficacy of dihydropyridine calcium entry blockers in hypertension and angina pectoris is arterial dilation, whereas nondihydropyridines may also derive part of their effect from inhibition of cardiac performance. As some of these patients, most commonly the elderly, have concomitant left ventricular dysfunction, it should be advantageous to avoid myocardial depression in the treatment of their primary disease. Preliminary studies in patients with heart failure indicate that felodipine and amlopidine may improve hemodynamics, reduce neurohormonal activation, and increase exercise tolerance, but final conclusions must await the randomized clinical trials now underway.     

Eplerenone: A Selective Aldosterone Blocker

Recent studies suggest that aldosterone may play a larger role than once appreciated in normal physiologic function and cardiovascular disease. Some of the adverse cardiovascular effects that have been described include cardiac and vascular fibrosis, vascular necrosis and inflammation, impaired endothelial function, reduced fibrinolysis, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), congestive heart failure, and cardiac arrhythmias. In light of these findings, the ability to block the actions of aldosterone has gained increased therapeutic importance. Eplerenone is a selective aldosterone receptor blocker that displays little interaction with androgen and progesterone receptors. Eplerenone has already been approved for the treatment of systemic hypertension and has been evaluated in numerous hypertension subgroups, including patients with low plasma renin activity; diabetes; LVH; uncontrolled blood pressure while receiving monotherapy with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin‐receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, or beta‐blockers; and in black patients. Results of these trials indicate that eplerenone lowers blood pressure and reduces end‐organ damage. Further proof of the therapeutic importance of mineralocorticoid receptor blockade comes from the eplerenone post acute myocardial infarction survival and efficacy study (EPHESUS). In this large‐scale clinical outcome trial, eplerenone was shown to reduce total mortality by 15% as well as the combined endpoint of cardiovascular mortality/cardiovascular hospitalization by 13% when administered at a mean of 7.3 days post myocardial infarction to patients with evidence of systolic left ventricular dysfunction and symptoms of heart failure. Eplerenone is well tolerated, with an adverse effect profile comparable to placebo. The advent of selective aldosterone blockers, such as eplerenone, should prove to be of great therapeutic value in hypertension control and prevention of cardiovascular disease and associated end‐organ damage.     

Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in the Elderly

Previous studies using pulsed Doppler echocardiography have demonstrated a pattern of abnormal left ventricular relaxation associated with increasing age. Specifically, aging is associated with decreased peak velocity of early diastolic mitral inflow, increased peak velocity of late diastolic inflow, increased isovolumic relaxation time, and early diastolic deceleration time. Abnormal relaxation can progress to significantly elevated left atrial pressure—characterized by increased early peak velocity and shortened isovolumic relaxation time and deceleration time—as part of the disease processes. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is highly prevalent, occurring in one half to two thirds of elderly patients with congestive heart failure, in association with normal systolic function. Left ventricular hypertrophy, which is commonly related to systemic arterial hypertension, and ischemic heart disease are the two major causes of abnormal left ventricular diastolic function in the elderly. Recently, newer echocardiographic techniques have been described that allow more accurate evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. Treatments for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction should focus on the underlying disease etiology as well as on the derangement in left ventricular diastolic function. Although calcium channel blockers and angiotensin—converting enzyme inhibitors have been used clinically to treat diastolic dysfunction, their effects on prognosis remain unproven.     

Left ventricular hypertrophy and its regression: pathophysiology and therapeutic approach: Focus on treatment by antihypertensive agents

In numerous studies, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has been clearly established to be a strong blood pressure (BP) independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In fact, increased echocardiographic left ventricular mass (LVM) has been shown to predict cardiovascular complications not only in patients with arterial hypertension, but also in the general population. Preliminary data revealed that regression of LVH reduced cardiovascular complications. As a consequence, regression of LVH emerged as a desirable goal in patients with echocardiographically determined LVH. These findings raised the question of whether certain antihypertensive drugs differ in their ability to reduce LVM. To resolve this issue, several comparative studies and some metaanalyses have been carried out. Regarding the available data until the end of 1996 including only double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical studies with parallel group design, we found that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduced LVM by 12% (95% CI, 9.0–14.5%), calcium channel blockers by 11% (95% CI, 7.8–13.7%), β-blockers by 5% (95% CI, 1.2–7.3%), and diuretics by 8% (95% CI, 3.9–11.1%) (overall: P < .01). A similar reduction was found for posterior and septal wall thickness. Thus, ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers seemed to be more potent than β-blockers in their ability to reduce LVH, with diuretics in the intermediate range. The role of new antihypertensive agents such as AT-receptor antagonists cannot be conclusively answered, because the available data source is too small at this time. In addition to the drug class, reduction of LVH seems to be determined by pretreatment LVM, decline in BP, and duration of drug treatment. Further prospective controlled trials will be required to finally evaluate whether the excellent reduction of LVH with ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers can be transferred into improved cardiovascular prognosis.     

Primary diastolic heart failure

Diastolic heart failure is defined clinically when signs and symptoms of heart failure are present in the presence of preserved left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction >45%). The incidence and prevalence of primary diastolic heart failure increases with age and it may be as high as 50% in the elderly. Age, female gender, hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and increased body mass index are risk factors for diastolic heart failure. Hemodynamic consequences such as increased pulmonary venous pressure, post-capillary pulmonary hypertension, and secondary right heart failure as well as decreased cardiac output are similar to those of systolic left ventricular failure, although the nature of primary left ventricular dysfunction is different. Diagnosis of primary diastolic heart failure depends on the presence of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Assessment of diastolic dysfunction is preferable but not mandatory. It is to be noted that increased levels of B-type natriuretic peptide does not distinguish between diastolic and systolic heart failure. Echocardiographic studies are recommended to exclude hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, infiltrative heart disease, primary valvular heart disease, and constrictive pericarditis. Myocardial stress imaging is frequently required to exclude ischemic heart disease. The prognosis of diastolic heart failure is variable; it is related to age, severity of heart failure, and associated comorbid diseases such as coronary artery disease. The prognosis of severe diastolic heart failure is similar to that of systolic heart failure. However, cautious use of diuretics and/or nitrates may cause hypotension and low output state. Heart rate control is essential to improving ventricular filling. Pharmacologic agents such as angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers are used in selected patients to decrease left ventricular hypertrophy. To decrease myocardial fibrosis, aldosterone antagonists have a potential therapeutic role. However, prospective controlled studies will be required to establish their efficacy in primary diastolic heart failure.