Trend of office and home blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients: changes in antihypertensive medication and salt intake

Blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensives has improved in recent years; however, it remains insufficient. We investigated the trend of BP control status in hypertensive patients with antihypertensive medication and salt intake. Two hundred and eight treated hypertensive patients were prospectively followed between 2007 and 2012. During this period, average clinic BP significantly decreased from 137?±?12/80?±?9 to 133?±?11/76?±?8?mmHg, and the achievement rate of BP control defined as <140/90?mmHg increased from 58% to 71% (p?p?p?相似文献   

Diuretics enhance effects of increased dose of candesartan on ambulatory blood pressure reduction in Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension treated with medium-dose angiotensin II receptor blockers

Although blockade of the renin–angiotensin system by increasing the dose of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) is recommended to achieve clinical benefits in terms of blood pressure (BP) control and cardiovascular and renal outcomes, the effect of this increased dose on ambulatory BP monitoring has not been evaluated completely in Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension undergoing medium-dose ARB therapy. The primary objective of this study was to examine the effect of the relatively high dose of the ARB candesartan (12?mg/day) on 24-h systolic BP and the attainment of target BP levels in uncontrolled hypertension treated with a medium dose of ARBs. A total of 146 hypertensive patients (age: 69.9?±?9.3 years; females: 65.8%) completed the study. After switching to candesartan at 12?mg/day, all these BP measurements decreased significantly (p?p?=?0.0014) and 24-h BP levels (p?=?0.0296) also improved significantly. Subgroup analysis indicated that the reduction of 24-h systolic BP was larger in patients treated with diuretics than those without (p?=?0.0206). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between the combined ARB and diuretic therapy, and the change in 24-h systolic BP irrespective of preceding ARBs. In conclusion, the switching therapy to increased dose of candesartan caused significant reductions in office and ambulatory BP levels, and improved the attainment of target BP levels in patients with uncontrolled hypertension treated with a medium dose of ARBs. Combination with diuretics enhanced this effect.     

Self‐measured worksite blood pressure and its association with organ damage in working adults: Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure (J‐HOP) worksite study

The effects of elevations in blood pressure (BP) on worksite stress as an out‐of‐office BP setting have been evaluated using ambulatory BP monitoring but not by self‐measurement. Herein, we determined the profile of self‐measured worksite BP in working adults and its association with organ damage in comparison with office BP and home BP measured by the same home BP monitoring device. A total of 103 prefectural government employees (age 45.3 ± 9.0 years, 77.7% male) self‐measured their worksite BP at four timepoints (before starting work, before and after a lunch break, and before leaving the workplace) and home BP in the morning, evening, and nighttime (at 2, 3, and 4 a.m.) each day for 14 consecutive days. In the total group, the average worksite systolic BP (SBP) was significantly higher than the morning home SBP (129.1 ± 14.3 vs. 124.4 ± 16.4 mmHg, p = .026). No significant difference was observed among the four worksite SBP values. Although the average worksite BP was higher than the morning home BP in the study participants with office BP < 140/90 mmHg (SBP: 121.4 ± 9.4 vs. 115.1 ± 10.4 mmHg, p < .001, DBP: 76.0 ± 7.7 vs. 72.4 ± 8.4 mmHg, p = .013), this association was not observed in those with office BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg or those using antihypertensive medication. Worksite SBP was significantly correlated with the left ventricular mass index evaluated by echocardiography (r = 0.516, p < .0001). The self‐measurement of worksite BP would be useful to unveil the risk of hypertension in working adults who show normal office and home BP.     

The velocity of home blood pressure reduction in response to low-dose eplerenone combined with other antihypertensive drugs determined by exponential decay function analysis

Background/objective: Eplerenone is a highly selective aldosterone blocker, which has the potential to lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension. The objective of this study was to assess the hypotensive effects of low-dose eplerenone (25?mg) using home BP measurements. We also assessed the time required to reach 95% of the maximum antihypertensive effect (stabilization time) by analyzing exponential decay functions using home BP measurements.

Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 83 hypertensive patients who were taking eplerenone 25?mg (age, 68.6?±?11.8?years; men, 36.1%) in addition to other antihypertensive agents. Home BPs were averaged in each patient for the last 5?days of each observation period. The morning versus evening effect (M/E ratio) and the evening versus morning effect (E/M ratio) were calculated to assess the duration of action of eplerenone.

Results: The mean home systolic/diastolic BPs at baseline were 136.8?±?8.8/77.2?±?9.3?mmHg, respectively. After 8?weeks of treatment with eplerenone, home systolic/diastolic BP significantly decreased by ?7.1?±?10.1/?2.6?±?5.0?mmHg (p?p?=?0.006) and 16.5 days (p?=?0.001), respectively. When eplerenone was administered in the morning, the M/E ratio was 1.1?±?0.3. The corresponding E/M ratio for evening administration was 0.9?±?0.6. Although no nocturia was observed, there was a slight but significant increase in serum potassium levels (p?=?0.03).

Conclusions: Our data suggest that the combination of eplerenone with other antihypertensive drugs may be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of essential hypertension.     

Negative association between plasma aldosterone concentration/plasma renin activity and morning blood pressure surge in never-treated hypertensive patients

Morning blood pressure (BP) surge (MS) has been known to be a predictor of cardiovascular events. Currently, few studies have evaluated the underlying mechanism underlying MS, which may include neurohormonal factors and the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). This study aimed to examine plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and plasma renin activity (PRA) and BP parameters with or without MS in never-treated subjects with essential hypertension. This cross-sectional study included a total of 261 patients (mean age: 48.8 years; 60.5% male) with never-treated essential hypertension who were registered in a working group at The Catholic University of Korea. The patients were divided into the MS group, which was defined as having the highest quartile of morning BP increase from sleep (>31?mmHg; n?=?66) and the non-MS group (≤31?mmHg; n?=?195). We collected 24-h ambulatory BP, pulse wave velocity, ankle brachial index, PAC and PRA from all patients. The measured PAC and PRA were lower in the MS group than in the non-MS group (PAC: 9.0?±?5.4?ng/dl versus 12.2?±?8.7?ng/dl, p?p?=?0.002). The MS group had greater variations in daytime, nighttime and 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBPs) than the non-MS group (24-h SBP: 15.6?±?4.4?mm Hg for the non-MS group and 18.9?±?4.9?mmHg for the MS group; p?相似文献   

Comparison of awake ambulatory blood pressure and automated office blood pressure using linear regression analysis in untreated patients in routine clinical practice

The recent American hypertension guidelines recommended a threshold of 130/80 mmHg to define hypertension on the basis of office, home or ambulatory blood pressure (BP). Despite recognizing the potential advantages of automated office (AO)BP, the recommendations only considered conventional office BP, without providing supporting evidence and without taking into account the well documented difference between office BP recorded in research studies versus routine clinical practice, the latter being about 10/7 mmHg higher. Accordingly, we examined the relationship between AOBP and awake ambulatory BP, which the guidelines considered to be a better predictor of future cardiovascular risk than office BP. AOBP readings and 24‐hour ambulatory BP recordings were obtained in 514 untreated patients referred for ambulatory BP monitoring in routine clinical practice. The relationship between mean AOBP and mean awake ambulatory BP was examined using linear regression analysis with and without adjustment for age and sex. Special attention was given to the thresholds of 130/80 and 135/85 mmHg, the latter value being the recognized threshold for defining hypertension using awake ambulatory BP, home BP and AOBP in other guidelines. The mean adjusted AOBP of 130/80 and 135/85 mmHg corresponded to mean awake ambulatory BP values of 132.1/81.5 and 134.4/84.6 mmHg, respectively. These findings support the use of AOBP as the method of choice for determining office BP in routine clinical practice, regardless of which of the two thresholds are used for diagnosing hypertension, with an AOBP of 135/85 mmHg being somewhat closer to the corresponding value for awake ambulatory BP.     

Effectiveness of using long-acting angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker in Japanese obese patients with metabolic syndrome on morning hypertension monitoring by using telemedicine system (FUJIYAMA Study)

Aim: Recently, obesity patients have been diagnosed as metabolic syndrome. The aim of this study was to evaluate which angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs), telmisartan or candesartan, is superior for the control of home blood pressure (BP) in the morning when the outpatient clinic BP was well controlled in the patients with metabolic syndrome.

Methods: The patients with metabolic syndrome were enrolled. Home BP was monitored by using a telemedicine system. After a 2- to 4-week control period to establish baseline home BP values, these patients were randomly divided into telmisartan (20–80?mg) and candesartan (4–12?mg) groups. These end points were evaluated by using the telemedicine system during steady-state active therapy. A total of 356 patients attending 60 outpatient Japanese centers were recruited.

Results: On a day of active therapy, telmisartan significantly lowered both systolic and diastolic home BP in the morning to a greater extent compared to candesartan. At the end of the study, reductions in systolic and diastolic home BP in the morning, in telmisartan group were significantly larger compared to the changes in the candesartan group (systolic; Tel: 12.0?±?8.9 versus Can: 8.1?±?17.1?mmHg, p?=?0.0292, diastolic; Tel: 7.4?±?6.1 versus Can: 3.7?±?6.8?mmHg, p?=?0.0053). Additionally in the telmisartan treated group, LDL-cholesterol showed significant reduction (p?=?0.037), but candesartan did not.

Conclusion: The present study by using the telemedicine system clearly demonstrated that telmisartan has a strong effect on reducing morning home BP, and a good effect on lipid metabolism in patients with metabolic syndrome.     

Uncontrolled hypertension in older patients: markers and associated factors to masked and white-coat effect

Background Hypertension is the main risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, affecting more than half the elderly population. It is essential to know if they have proper control of hypertension. The aim of this study was to identify the associated factors to masked uncontrolled hypertension and false uncontrolled hypertension in older patients. Methods Two-hundred seventy-three individuals (70.1 ± 6.7 years-old) had blood pressure (BP) measured at the office and by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), with the definition of controlled group (C), individuals with high office BP and adequate ABPM, called white-coat effect group (WCE), uncontrolled (UC), and subjects with appropriate office BP and elevated ABPM denominated masked effect group (ME). Age, body mass index, diabetes, pulse pressure (PP) and BP dipping during sleep were evaluated (Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression models). Results Age was higher in UC than in C and ME (P < 0.01), and 24-h ABPM PP was lower in C (48 ± 7 mmHg) and WCE (51 ± 6 mmHg) than in UC (67 ± 12 mmHg) and ME (59 ± 8 mmHg) (P < 0.01). Sleep systolic BP dipping was lower in ME than in C (P = 0.03). Female gender was associated with a greater chance of being of ME group, which showed a higher PP and lower BP dipping during sleep. Conclusions In older individuals, office BP measurements did not allow the detection of associated factors that would permit to differentiate WCE from UC group and C from ME group. ABPM favored the identification of a higher PP and a lower BP dipping during sleep in the masked effect and uncontrolled groups.     

Evaluation of prehypertension and masked hypertension rate among clinically normotensive patients

Background: The present cross-sectional study was aimed to identify pre-hypertension and masked hypertension rate in clinically normotensive adults in relation to socio-demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: A total of 161 clinically normotensive adults with office blood pressure (OBP) <140/90?mmHg without medication were included in this single-center cross-sectional study. OBP, home BP (HBP) recordings and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) were used to identify rates of true normotensives, true pre-hypertensives and masked hypertensives. Data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected in each subject and evaluated with respect to true normotensive vs. pre-hypertensive patients with masked hypertension or true pre-hypertensive. Target organ damage (TOD) was evaluated in masked hypertensives based on laboratory investigation. Results: Masked hypertension was identified in 8.7% of clinically normotensives. Alcohol consumption was significantly more common in masked hypertension than in true pre-hypertension (28.6 vs. 0.0%, p?=?0.020) with risk ratio of 2.7 (95% CI 1.7–4.4). Patients with true pre-hypertension and masked hypertension had significantly higher values for body mass index, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic OBP and HBP (p?<?0.05 for each) compared to true normotensive subjects. ABPM revealed significantly higher values for day-time and night-time systolic and diastolic BP (p?=?0.002 for night-time diastolic BP, p?<?0.001 for others) in masked hypertension than true pre-hypertension. Conclusions: Given that the associations of pre-hypertension with TOD might be attributable to the high prevalence of insidious presentation of masked hypertension among pre-hypertensive individuals, ABPM seems helpful in early identification and management of masked hypertension in the pre-hypertensive population.     

Catheter-based renal denervation in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease and uncontrolled hypertension

Sympathetic activation contributes to the progression of hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Ablation of renal sympathetic nerves lowers blood pressure (BP) and preserves renal function in patients with CKD and uncontrolled hypertension by reducing sympathetic nerve activity. But whether this approach is safe and effective in Chinese patients with CKD is unknown. We performed an observational study of eight patients with CKD stages from 1 to 5, office BP ≥150/90 mmHg, while on at least three antihypertensive drug classes including a diuretic, and diagnosis confirmed by 24 h ambulatory systolic BP measurement ≥135 mmHg. All patients underwent catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) using a newly designed RDN System (Golden Leaf Medtech, Shanghai, China). For up to 6 months after RDN, BP was monitored and renal function was assessed. Mean baseline office BP was 165.0 ± 13.9/97.8 ± 5.5 mmHg, despite treatment with three antihypertensive drugs. Six months after RDN, office BP was reduced by 22.1 ± 12.0 (P = .002)/11.0 ± 8.8 mmHg (P = .012) and average 24 h ambulatory BP by 18 ± 13.7 (P = .01)/9.3 ± 7.7 mmHg (P = .016). After RDN, heart rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) had no significant change compared with before RDN. In Chinese patients with CKD, our observational pilot study found that treating hypertension with RDN lowers BP while not affecting renal function. Brief Abstract: We performed RDN in eight Chinese patients with hypertension and CKD. The results showed that RDN lowered blood pressure of these patients significantly and eGFR was stable. No obvious adverse event was observed.     

The relationship between bone mineral density and blood pressure in the Korean elderly population: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008–2011

Abstract

It is not clear whether the inverse relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and blood pressure (BP) could be generalizable to the general elderly population. We used data from the fourth and fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The study sample consisted of 8439 men and postmenopausal women aged 50 years and older. We evaluated the relationship between BMD and BP. When adjusted for covariates, femur neck T-score [coefficient?=??0.391, 95% confidence interval (CI) ?0.766 to ?0.016, p?=?0.041] had an inverse relationship with diastolic BP (DBP), whereas lumbar spine BMD (coefficient?=?0.395, 95% CI 0.058–7.752, p?=?0.047) and T-score (coefficient?=?0.458, 95% CI 0.005–0.911, p?=?0.047) had a positive relationship with systolic BP (SBP). When adjusted for confounding factors, SBP (128.67?±?0.979?mmHg versus 126.36?±?0.545?mmHg, p?=?0.026) and DBP (78.8?±?0.622?mmHg versus 77.27?±?0.283?mmHg, p?=?0.016) were significantly higher in femur neck osteoporosis subjects than non-osteoporosis subjects. However, there were no differences in BP in relation to lumbar spine osteoporosis. Femur neck osteoporosis (odds ratio?=?1.422, 95% CI 1.107–1.827, p?=?0.006) had a significant and positive relationship with hypertension, whereas the other parameters of BMD were not significantly related to hypertension. In conclusion, higher BP and hypertension were significantly and positively correlated with femur neck osteoporosis in men and postmenopausal women aged 50 years and older.     

Characteristics of white coat hypertension in Chinese Han patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objectives: This study documented the prevalence and clinical features of white coat hypertension (WCH) among Chinese Han patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T₂DM). Methods: Clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements were compared in 856 patients with T₂DM to determine the frequency of WCH (WCH was defined as clinical blood pressure ≥140/90?mmHg and daytime blood pressure <135/85?mmHg and/or 24-h ambulatory BP (ABP) mean value of <130/80?mmHg on ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Weight, waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), waist to height ratio (WHtR), fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin level and circadian BP patterns were also measured to find clinical features predictive of WCH in T₂DM. Results: The prevalence of WCH was 7.36% (63/856) in the overall population, 6.13% (29/473) in male and 8.88% (34/383) in female (p?2DM, male WC were independent protective factors, whereas female sex, smoking and alcohol consumption were independent risk factors for WCH in T₂DM. Non-dippers and reverse dippers made up larger proportion of the WCH group (p?Conclusion: WCH is relatively common among T₂DM patients, it is a unique condition distinct from essential hypertension (EH), and WCH patients also exhibit significant differences in clinical parameters.     

Home blood pressure is as reliable as ambulatory blood pressure in predicting target-organ damage in hypertension

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the value of home blood pressure (BP) monitoring in comparison to office BP measurements and ambulatory monitoring in predicting hypertension-induced target-organ damage. METHODS: Sixty-eight untreated patients with hypertension with at least two routine prestudy office visits were included (mean age, 48.6 +/- 9.1 [SD] years; 50 men). Office BP was measured in two study visits, home BP was measured for 6 workdays, and ambulatory BP was monitored for 24 h. All BP measurements were obtained using validated electronic devices. Target-organ damage was assessed by measuring the echocardiographic left-ventricular mass index (LVMI), urinary albumin excretion rate (AER) in two overnight urine collections, and carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (PWV) (Complior device; Colson, Garges-les-Gonesse, Paris, France). RESULTS: The correlation coefficients of LVMI with office BP were 0.24/0.15 (systolic/diastolic), with home BP 0.35/0.21 (systolic, P < .01), and with 24-h ambulatory BP 0.23/0.19, awake 0.21/0.16, and asleep 0.28/0.26 (asleep, both P < .05). The correlation coefficients of AER with office BP were 0.24/0.31 (diastolic, P < .05), with home BP 0.28/0.26 (both P < .05), and with 24-h ambulatory BP 0.25/0.24, awake 0.24/0.25 (diastolic, P < .05), and asleep 0.26/0.18 (systolic, P < .05). There was a trend for negative correlations between PWV and diastolic BP measurements (not significant). In multiple-regression models assessing independent predictors of each of the three indices of target-organ damage, systolic home BP and age were the only independent predictors of increased LVMI that reached borderline statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that home BP is as reliable as ambulatory monitoring in predicting hypertension-induced target-organ damage, and is superior to carefully taken office measurements.     

Comparison of valsartan and amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients

We tested the hypothesis that calcium channel blockers (CCBs: amlodipine group, n = 38)) are superior to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs: valsartan group, n = 38) against ambulatory blood pressure variability (BPV) in untreated Japanese hypertensive patients. Both drugs significantly reduced ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP values. With regard to BPV, standard deviation (SD) in SBP did not change with the administration of either drug, but the ARB significantly increased SD in awake DBP (12 ± 4–14 ± 4 mmHg). The ARB also significantly increased the coefficients of variation (CVs)in awake and 24-h SBP/DBP (all P < 0.05), but amlodipine did not change the CV. CCB significantly reduced the maximum values of awake SBP (193 ± 24–182 ± 27 mmHg, P = 0.02), sleep SBP (156 ± 18–139 ± 14 mmHg, P < 0 .001), and awake and sleep DBP (P < 0.01 in both cases), but the ARB did not change the maximum BP values. In conclusion, a once-daily morning dose of CCB amlodipine was more effective at controlling ambulatory BPV than ARB valsartan, especially in reducing maximum BP levels.     

Left ventricular diastolic function evaluated by the E/e’ ratio is impaired in patients with masked uncontrolled hypertension

Background: Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUH), defined as controlled office blood pressure (BP) but uncontrolled out-of-office BP in treated hypertensives, is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. We tested the hypothesis that MUH is associated with a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction than controlled hypertension (CH) or uncontrolled hypertension (UH).

Methods and results: We studied 299 treated patients who had at least one cardiovascular risk factor (age, 63?±?10 years; male sex, 43%), consisting of 94 (31.4%) patients with UH, 46 (15.4%) with MUH, 56 (18.7%) with treated white-coat hypertension (WCH), and 103 (34.4%) with CH. We performed office and home BP monitoring, electrocardiography, echocardiography and blood tests. Diastolic dysfunction was defined as an E-wave to e’-wave (E/e’) ratio ≥8 measured by Doppler echocardiography. The value of E/e’ was higher in the MUH (8.3?±?2.7) and UH (8.3?±?2.7) groups than in the CH group (7.3?±?2.3; p?=?0.08, p?=?0.02, respectively). In multivariable analysis, MUH was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of diastolic dysfunction than CH (odds ratio 2.90 versus CH, p?Conclusions: MUH and UH were associated with a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction than CH. Even in treated patients, out-of-office BP is important to stratify the risk of cardiovascular disease.     

Role of blood pressure monitoring in non-pharmacological management of hypertension

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and home blood pressure (BP) measurement appear to be useful in the assessment of the effects of non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension because they can detect small changes in BP without observer bias. We studied the effects of various lifestyle modifications using ABPM and home BP measurement in Japanese patients with hypertension. Weight reduction by a hypocaloric diet (average 4 kg) was associated with decreases in 24-h BP (10/4 mmHg) as well as casual BP (9/6 mmHg). The reductions in daytime and night-time BPs were comparable. The effects of daily walking without weight loss on office, home, and 24-h BPs were 2-3/1-2 mmHg. The changes in home and 24-h BPs were more significant than those in office BP. A low-salt diet (25 mmol/day versus 250 mmol/day) decreased 24-h BP by 9/4 mmHg. This hypotensive effect was observed throughout the day. Potassium supplementation (64 mmol/day) decreased office, home and 24-h BPs by 3-4/1-2 mmHg. The changes in home and 24-h BPs were highly significant compared with office BP. Supplementation of magnesium (20 mmol/day) also reduced those BPs significantly. However, the effects of calcium supplementation (25 mmol/day) were small (1-2/1 mmHg) and were significant only for home BP. Alcohol restriction for 4 weeks decreased daytime BP by 3/2 mmHg but increased night-time BP by 4/2 mmHg. Average 24-h BP did not change. Smoking cessation lowered daytime BP without affecting night-time BP. Monitoring of 24-h BP and home BP can detect small changes in BP produced by lifestyle modifications. Ambulatory BP monitoring is particularly suitable in the assessment of changes in lifestyle affecting the circadian pattern of BP such as alcohol consumption and smoking.     

Blood Pressure-Lowering Efficacy of Amiloride versus Enalapril as Add-On Drugs in Patients with Uncontrolled Blood Pressure Receiving Hydrochlorothiazide

A large proportion of patients with hypertension need a second drug to reach satisfactory control of blood pressure (BP), but there are few well-designed controlled trials comparing the efficacy of drugs added as a second option. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, 82 patients with uncontrolled BP, receiving hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg daily, were selected to receive amiloride 2.5–5 mg/day (n?=?39) or enalapril 10–20 mg/day (n?=?43). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was done before and after 12-weeks of treatment. Office BP was measured in the 4^th, 8^th, and 12^th weeks. The doses of amiloride and enalapril were doubled in the fourth week, and propranolol was added in the 8th week if office BP was above 140/90 mm Hg. There was a greater BP reduction in patients treated with enalapril. The ABPM δ values between the groups were 3.6?±?2.2, 3.9?±?2.2, and 1.1?±?2.7 mmHg for 24-h, daily, and nightly systolic blood pressure, respectively, favoring enalapril. For diastolic blood pressure (DBP), the deltas were 1.7?±?2.0, 3.2?±?1.5, and 1.2?±?1.9 mmHg, respectively (p?=?0.039 for daily DBP). Office SBP decreased more and sooner in patients allocated to enalapril (p?=?0.003). More patients taking amiloride required propranolol to control BP (p?=?0.035). Potassium increased 0.3 mEq/L on the average in both groups. Cough, albeit predominantly mild, was reported more frequently by participants treated with enalapril. We conclude that enalapril is more effective than amiloride to lower BP of patients on hydrochlorothiazide with uncontrolled BP.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00394394.     

The changes in blood pressure after acute stroke: abolishing the ‘white coat effect’ with 24-h ambulatory monitoring

Objectives . To assess the changes in 24-h and casual blood pressure (BP) levels following hospitalization for acute stroke. Design . Prospective study of patients admitted with acute hemispheric stroke and hospitalized controls using casual and 24-h BP monitoring. Setting . Medical wards in a large teaching hospital. Subjects . Thirty-three patients (median age 77 years, 17 male) and 21 control subjects admitted non-acutely. Interventions . All subjects underwent 24-h BP monitoring within 24 h of stroke onset (patients) or admission (controls) and again at 1 week. Casual BPs were recorded over the same period. Main outcome measures . The change in BP over the first week in each group. Eleven stroke subjects had 24-h BP monitoring repeated at 6 months. Results . In the stroke group, 24-h systolic BP (SBP) fell by 7 mmHg (95% CI, 0 to 14 mmHg; P < 0.05) and diastolic BP (DBP) by 3 mmHg (95% CI, 0 to 6 mmHg; P < 0.02) over the first week. Mean 24-h BP levels in the control group did not change during this period. However, casual BP recordings fell in both stroke (18/12 mmHg) and control (19/9 mmHg) groups. Stroke subjects followed to 6 months showed no further change in 24-h BP (day 7: 137±17/79±13 mmHg; month 6: 138 ± 16/78 ± 11 mmHg). Conclusions . Although there was a large fall in causal BPs seen in both groups there, was only a small, but a significant fall in mean 24-h BP over the first week following hemispheric stroke that was not seen in control subjects. Although the ‘white coat effect’ and admission to hospital play an important part in the high casual BP observed in the days following acute stroke they are unlikely to be the sole factors.     

Aldosterone-to-renin ratio and nocturnal blood pressure decline assessed by self-measurement of blood pressure at home: the Ohasama Study

Based on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) has been reported to be associated with a diminished nocturnal decline in BP, generally referred to as a “non-dipping” pattern. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the association between ARR and the non-dipping pattern based on home BP measurements. This study included 177 participants ≥55 years from the general population of Ohasama (mean age: 67.2 years; 74.6% women); no patient was receiving antihypertensive treatment. The median plasma renin activity (PRA), plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and ARR were 0.8?ng/mL/h, 8.1?ng/dL and 9.7?ng/dL per ng/mL/h, respectively. Each 1 SD increase in log-transformed (ln) ARR was significantly associated with the prevalence of the non-dipping pattern after adjustments for possible confounding factors including home morning systolic BP (odds ratio, 1.45; p?=?0.049). However, no significant associations of PRA or PAC with the non-dipping pattern were observed (p?≥?0.2). When participants were divided into four groups according to median levels of home morning and night-time systolic BPs, the group with a higher home morning systolic BP (≥128.4?mmHg) with a higher home night-time systolic BP (≥114.4?mmHg) had the greatest ARR levels (ANCOVA p?=?0.01). These results support the hypothesis that relative aldosterone excess may be related to a non-dipping pattern in a general population and suggest that a non-dipping pattern can be accurately observed by home BP measurements.     

COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF AMLODIPINE AND LOSARTAN ON 24-HOUR AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS

Effects of amlodipine (AML), a long-acting calcium antagonist, and losartan (LOS), an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on 24-hr blood pressure profile were compared in 15 patients with essential hypertension. After 4 weeks of placebo period, the patients were treated with AML or LOS in a random cross-over design for 12–16 weeks each. Either drug was given once daily at 0800 and the doses were titrated so that the office blood pressure was reduced lower than 140/90 mmHg. At the end of each period, 24-hr blood pressure was monitored. Average office blood pressure was lowered from 158 ± 2/ 98 ± 2 mmHg to 134 ± 1/87 ± 1 mmHg by AML and 134 ± 2/88 ± 1 mmHg by LOS. Average 24-hr blood pressure was also reduced from 144 ± 3/ 92 ± 2 mmHg to 131 ± 2/84 ± 2 mmHg by AML and 135 ± 3/85 ± 2 mmHg by LOS. The averaged 24-hr systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in AML than in LOS (p < 0.05). Then, the 24-hr blood pressure was analyzed for four segments; morning (0530–0900 h), daytime (0930–1800 h), evening (1830–2300 h) and night (2330–0500 h). Although the daytime blood pressure was comparable between AML and LOS, systolic blood pressure in the evening and morning hours were lower in AML than in LOS (133 ± 2 vs. 138 ± 3 mmHg, p < 0.01; 129 ± 3 vs. 134 ± 4, p < 0.05). Trough to peak ratio of antihypertensive effect on systolic blood pressure was significantly greater in AML than in LOS (62 ± 5% vs. 55 ± 4%, p < 0.05). Either drug did not cause reflective increase in pulse rate over 24 hours. These results suggest that both AML and LOS are equally effective in lowering daytime blood pressure without eliciting reflex tachycardia, however, the antihypertensive effect of AML lasts longer than that of LOS. Such information seems important to achieve 24-hr blood pressure control using these drugs.