The Relationship Between Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio and Non-dipper Hypertension

Non-dipper hypertension is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been associated with poor outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, little is known about the role of NLR in patients with non-dipper hypertension. In this study, NLR between dipper and non-dipper hypertensive patients was compared.This study included 80 hypertensive patients. Hypertensive patients were divided into two groups: 50 dipper patients (29 male, mean age 51.5 ± 8 years) and 30 non-dipper patients (17 male, mean age 50.6 ± 5.4 years). Transthoracic echocardiography and ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure monitoring were performed on all patients. No patient had a recent history of an acute infection or an inflammatory disease. Baseline NLR was measured by dividing neutrophil count to lymphocyte count. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of basic characteristics. Mean NLR was significantly higher among persons with non-dipper compared with dipper patients (3.1 ± 0.95 vs. 1.8 ± 0.52, P < .001). Additionally, leukocytes and monocytes counts were higher in patients with non-dipper hypertension.In conclusion, our results suggest that higher NLR, an emerging marker of inflammation, has a positive correlation with blood pressure and is elevated in non-dippers compared with dippers.     

Detection of atrial electrical and mechanical dysfunction in non-dipper pre-hypertensive subjects

Introduction: A relationship between atrial conduction time and hypertension was shown in previous studies. Increased atrial electromechanical intervals used to predict atrial fibrillation by measured tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). So we aimed to search if there was any association between the non-dipping status and atrial electromechanical intervals in pre-hypertensive patients.

Methods: Forty-one non-dipper and 33 dipper pre-hypertensive subjects enrolled in the study. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer. Twenty-four hours blood pressure was measured with cuff-oscillometric method. All patients were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography. Using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), atrial electromechanical coupling (PA) was measured from the lateral mitral annulus (PA lateral), septal mitral annulus (PA septum) and right ventricular tricuspid annulus (PA tricuspid).

Results: Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly higher in subjects with non-dipper phenomenon than dipper ones at night. Twenty-four hours average systolic and diastolic blood pressures were higher in non-dipper pre-hypertensive subjects, but this elevation was not significant. Left and right intraatrial (PA lateral-PA septum and PA septum-PA tricuspid) and interatrial (PA lateral-PA tricuspid) electromechanical coupling intervals were measured significantly higher in non-dipper pre-hypertensive patients (31.3?±?3.9 versus 24.1?±?2.3, p?=?0.001; 19.5?±?4.3 versus 13.8?±?2.1, p?=?0.001; and 11.4?±?2.8 versus 8.8?±?1.5, p?=?0.001). Also, interatrial electromechanical delay was negatively correlated with dipping levels.

Conclusion: This study showed that prolonged atrial electromechanical intervals were related non-dipper pattern in pre-hypertensive patients. Prolonged electromechanical intervals may be an early sign of subclinical atrial dysfunction and arrhythmias’ in non-dipper pre-hypertensive patients.     

The Effect of Non-dipper and Dipper Blood Pressure Patterns on Aortic Elasticity in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of blood pressure (BP) rhythm on aortic functions in patients with metabolic syndrome. Seventy patients with newly diagnosed hypertension who fulfilled the metabolic syndrome criteria according to the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (NCEP/ATP-III) were evaluated with 24-hour BP holter monitoring. According to BP rhythm, 35 patients with dipper BP pattern and 35 patients with non-dipper BP pattern were enrolled as two groups in our study. Systolic and diastolic diameters of the ascending aorta were measured by M-mode echocardiography and aortic functions (aortic strain, distensibility, and stiffness index) were calculated. The nocturnal systolic and diastolic BPs were significantly higher in non-dipper patients than the dipper group. According to clinical parameters including age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, waist circumference, clinical systolic, and diastolic BPs, we did not find significantly difference between the two groups. Aortic strain was significantly higher (6.63 ± 3.37 vs. 1.81 ± 0.92; P < .0001) and aortic distensibility was lower (2.38 ± 1.18 cm^?2/dyn/10^?6 and 6.66 ± 3.67 cm^?2/dyn/10^?6; P < .001) in non-dipper group. These findings suggest that aortic functions were prominently deteriorated in non-dipper hypertensive patients than dippers with metabolic syndrome.     

Night Blood Pressure: Relation to Organ Lesions in Microalbuminuric Type 1 Diabetic Patients

Ambulatory blood pressure was measured in 23 microalbuminuric Type 1 diabetic patients without hypertension. Nine patients had a reduction in mean arterial blood (MAP) pressure at night < 10% of their day-time value (non-dippers). The following parameters were measured: glomerular filtration rate (GFR), overnight urinary excretion of albumin (UAE), sodium and potassium, left ventricular dimensions, extracellular volume (ECV), plasma aldosterone, and arginine vasopressin (AVP). Night-time MAP was 11 mmHg lower in patients designated as dippers than in non-dippers. Day-time MAP was similar in dippers (98 ± 5 mmHg) and non-dippers (99 ± 8 mmHg, NS). No statistical significant difference was found for UAE in dippers (geometric mean, x/– tolerance factor, μg min^-1) (72 x/– 2.1) vs non-dippers (63 x/– 2.1), for left ventricular mass index (63 ± 12 vs 59 ± 10 g m^-2), or for GFR (134 ± 19 vs 148 ± 22 ml min^-1). Aldosterone and AVP were lower in non-dippers (p < 0.05) and a negative correlation in all patients was noticed between ECV and aldosterone (rho = ?0.50, p < 0.05). Sodium and potassium excretion and ECV were indistinguishable between the groups. We conclude (1) that impaired reduction of night blood pressure does not seem to be associated with more signs of renal or cardiac lesions and (2) that the lower aldosterone and AVP in non-dippers may counteract volume expansion.     

Circadian variation of blood pressure and endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension:a comparison of dippers and non-dippers

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the circadian blood pressure (BP) rhythm and endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension. BACKGROUND: Hypertension is associated with alterations in resistance artery endothelial function. Patients with a non-dipper circadian pattern of BP have a greater risk of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications than do patients with a dipper circadian pattern. METHODS: We evaluated the forearm blood flow (FBF) response to intra-arterial acetylcholine (ACh), an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, and isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN), an endothelium-independent vasodilator, infusion in 20 patients with non-dipper hypertension and 20 age- and gender-matched patients with dipper hypertension. The FBF was measured using a mercury-filled Silastic strain-gauge plethysmograph. RESULTS: The 24-h systolic BP, as well as nocturnal systolic and diastolic BPs were higher in non-dipper patients than in dipper patients. The 24-h urinary excretion of nitrite/nitrate and cyclic guanosine monophosphate was lower in non-dippers than in dippers. The response of FBF to ACh was smaller in non-dippers than in dippers (25.1 +/- 3.1 vs. 20.2 +/- 3.0 ml/min/100 ml tissue, p < 0.05). The FBF response to ISDN was similar in dippers and non-dippers. The FBF response to ACh was similar in the two groups following intra-arterial infusion of the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that endothelium-dependent vasodilation is blunted through a decrease in NO release in non-dippers compared with patients who have dipper hypertension.     

Serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels and inflammatory activity in patients with non-dipper hypertension

Non-dipper hypertension is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) level, which is accepted as a marker for oxidative stress and its relationship with inflammatory activity in patients with non-dipper hypertension. Age and sex matched 43 dipper hypertensive patients, 40 non-dipper patients, and 46 healthy subjects were included into the study. Serum GGT and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured and compared between each of the groups. Serum GGT activity was higher in the non-dipper and the dipper hypertensive groups than in the control group (33.5 ± 11.8 and 28.1 ± 10.1 U/l, respectively, vs. 21.2 ± 6.5 U/l; p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in serum GGT activity between the non-dippers and the dippers (p = 0.021). When compared with the control group, serum CRP levels were significantly increased in both the non-dipper and the dipper hypertensive groups (6.1 ± 2.6 and 5.4 ± 2.1 mg/l, respectively, vs. 2.8 ± 1.7 mg/L; p < 0.001). Increased CRP levels were higher in non-dippers than dippers (p = 0.046). A significant correlation was found between GGT and CRP measurements (r = 0.37, p = 0.002). Serum GGT levels, which are markers of the oxidative stress and CRP levels, are both increased in non-dipper hypertension. Increased GGT activity, found to be correlated with CRP levels, may be one of the reasons behind the non-dipper hypertension related cardiovascular complications.     

Cigarette smoking and ventricular arrhythmia in coronary heart disease

With use of 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, the effect of 1 hour of cigarette smoking on cardiac rhythm in 73 patients with coronary heart disease was studied. Fifteen subjects had no arrhythmia; 37 subjects had fewer than 2 atrial or ventricular premature complexes (APCs or VPCs)/hour, with APCs possibly related to smoking in 2 and VPCs related to smoking in 1. Nineteen subjects had more than 2 VPCs/hour (range 4 to 368) and had 16 ± 29 VPCs/hour (± standard deviation) less during than before smoking (p <0.05), associated with an increase in heart rate of 4.6 ±6.8 beats/min (p <0.01). In none of the 9 subjects with unifocal VPCs did multiform beats develop during or after smoking, whereas 3 of 10 subjects with multiform VPCs had only unifocal beats during and immediately after smoking. In 1 of these 19 subjects, frequent APCs developed during smoking. One other subject had frequent APCs unaffected by smoking and another had sinoatrial block, which disappeared during smoking on 1 of 3 monitorings. In conclusion, no sustained or high-grade ventricular arrhythmia was provoked by smoking; although APCs may have been related to smoking in a few persons, the frequency and complexity of VPCs tended to be reduced in these subjects with coronary artery disease.     

高血压患者血压节律与靶器官损害的相关性研究

目的 探讨高血压患者血压节律变化与心、脑、肾等靶器官损害的相关性。方法 应用无创性血压监测仪对84例高血压患者进行24小时动态血压监测,对比血压节律正常(勺型组)和异常(非勺型组)患者心、脑、肾靶器官损害程度。结果 非勺型组24小时平均收缩压和舒张压、白昼平均舒张压、夜间平均收缩压和舒张压、收缩压及舒张压负荷值较勺型组升高(P<0.01);左心室重量和重量指数显著增加(P<0.05,0.01),24小时平均动脉压与左心室重量指数呈显著相关性r=0.55,P<0.01;尿微量白蛋白阳性率明显增高(P<0.05);脑梗死发生率明显增加(P<0.05);组间在偶测平均收缩压和舒张压、白昼平均收缩压均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 血压昼夜节律异常较节律正常的高血压患者有更显著的靶器官损害。     

Frequency domain of heart rate and blood pressure variability in essential hypertensive patients during sleep: differences between dippers and non-dippers

METHODS: Autonomic nervous function was evaluated by means of power spectral analysis of heart rate and blood pressure variability in dipper (n = 10) and non-dipper (n = 9) essential hypertensive subjects during sleep. The non-dipper subjects were defined as those in whom the nocturnal decrease in blood pressure was < 10% of the daytime blood pressure. We measured beat-to-beat blood pressure by using a Finapres device and all stages of sleep by simultaneous polysomnographic recording during spontaneous nocturnal sleep. We analysed the pattern of changes in blood pressure for random periods of 4 min duration while the patient was awake and during all stages of sleep. For each period (waking, stages 2, 3 and 4 of sleep) a segment of 256 stationary data points was analysed. In the frequency domain, the spectral characteristics of the stationary segments were estimatred by fast Fourier transformation over three frequency bands: low frequency (0.025-0.07 Hz), mid-frequency (0.07-0.14 Hz) and high frequency (0.14-0.35 Hz). RESULTS: Pulse-interval power spectral analysis did not reveal any difference between dippers and non-dippers during waking. In dipper patients, the low-frequency pulse interval (LFPI) decreased during sleep whereas the high-frequency pulse interval increased; the mid-frequency systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) decreased significantly and the high-frequency DBP increased during sleep. In non-dipper patients, the LFPI increased from wakefulness to stages 2 and 3 of sleep and the high-frequency pulse interval decreased during sleep; the mid-frequency systolic blood pressure and DBP increased in stage 4 sleep and the high-frequency DBP decreased during sleep. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that non-dipper hypertensive subjects are characterized by increased LFPI and mid-frequency blood pressure during sleep compared with dipper subjects. This alteration in the autonomic nervous function may explain the non-dipper phenomenon in essential hypertension.     

Comparison of subclinical left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction in non-dipper and dipper hypertensives: impact of isovolumic acceleration

Objectives: To evaluate subclinical left ventricular and right ventricular systolic impairment in dipper and non-dipper hypertensives by using isovolumic acceleration.

Methods: About 45 normotensive healthy volunteers (20 men, mean age 43?±?9 years), 45 dipper (27 men, mean age 45?±?9 years) and 45 non-dipper (25 men, 47?±?7 years) hypertensives were enrolled. Isovolumic acceleration was measured by dividing the peak myocardial isovolumic contraction velocity by isovolumic acceleration time.

Results: Non-dippers indicated lower left ventricular (2.2?±?0.4?m/s² versus 2.8?±?1.0?m/s², p?2 versus 3.5?±?1.0?m/s², p?=?0.012) compared with dippers. Left ventricular mass index (p?=?0.001), interventricular septal thickness (p?=?0.002) and myocardial performance index (p?p?=?0.002), mass index (p?=?0.001) and right ventricular myocardial performance index (p?Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that non-dipper hypertensives have increased left and right ventricular subclinical systolic dysfunction compared with dippers. Isovolumic acceleration is the only echocardiographic parameter in predicting this subtle impairment.     

The relationship between eosinophil and nondipper hypertension

AimsNon-dipper hypertension is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is known that eosinophils play an important role in vasoconstriction and thrombosis. We aimed to compare the numbers of eosinophil counts of the patients nondipper versus dipper hypertension.Materials and methodThis study included 70 hypertensive patients. Hypertensive patients were divided into two groups: 35 dipper patients (15 male, mean age 50.94±11.13 years) and 35 non-dipper patients (10 male, mean age 56.11±11.05 years). Concurrent routine biochemical tests and eosinophil count on whole blood count were performed on these patients. These parameters were compared between groups.ResultsNo statistically significant difference was found between two groups in terms of basic characteristics. Baseline characteristics of the study groups were comparable. Nondipper patients had a higher eosinophil and MPV value than dipper patients (148.86±80 vs. 304.57±182 and 7.8±0.12 vs. 9.2±0.2 fl p<0.001, respectively).ConclusionEosinophil count and MPV value are higher in patients with nondipper hypertension when compared to the dippers.     

Neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension

Background: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are associated with worse outcome in various diseases. Non-dipping blood pressure pattern is associated with higher cardiovascular mortality. The aim of this study was to explore the association between NLR and PLR in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension.

Methods: The study included 166 patients with hypertension. Eighty-three patients (40 male, mean age: 49.1?±?10.5 years) had dipper hypertension, while 83 patients (41 male, mean age: 52.3?±?12.7 years) had non-dipper hypertension.

Results: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients with non-dipper hypertension had significantly higher NLR compared to dipper hypertension (2.3?±?0.9 versus 1.8?±?0.5, p?p?=?0.001). In univariate analysis, hyperlipidemia, smoking, presence of diabetes, PLR more than 107 and NLR more than 1.89 were among predictors of dipper and non-dipper status. In logistic regression analyses, only hyperlipidemia (odds ratio: 2.96, CI: 1.22–7.13) and PLR more than 107 (odds ratio: 2.62, CI: 1.13–6.06) were independent predictors of dipper and non-dipper status. A PLR of 107 or higher predicted non-dipper status with a sensitivity of 66.3% and specificity of 68.7%.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that patients with non-dipper hypertension had significantly higher NLR and PLR compared to dipper hypertension, which has not been reported previously. Moreover PLR more than 107 but not NLR was independent predictor of non-dipper status.     

The relationship between fragmented QRS and non-dipper status in hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy

Background: Fragmented QRS (fQRS) has been shown to be associated with poor outcome in various cardiovascular diseases. Non-dipper hypertension is also associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. The aim of our study is to investigate the relationship between fQRS and non-dipper status in hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Methods: This study included 106 hypertensive patients without LVH. Patients were divided into two groups: dipper hypertension and non-dipper hypertension. The presence of fQRS was analyzed from surface electrocardiography. Results: Frequency of fQRS (56% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001) and mean number of leads with fQRS (1.9 ± 1.7 vs. 0.6 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with non-dipper hypertension compared to dipper hypertension. In addition, the number of leads with fQRS was positively correlated with systolic (r = 0.334, p < 0.001) and diastolic (r = 0.280, p = 0.004) blood pressures (BP). By a multivariate regression analysis, fQRS (OR: 5.207, 95% CI: 2.195–12.353, p < 0.001) was found to be independent predictor of non-dipper status. Conclusion: fQRS is independent predictor of non-dipper status in hypertensive patients without LVH. Also, the higher number of leads with fQRS is associated with higher sleep systolic and diastolic BPs.     

Night time blood pressure and cardiovascular structure in a middle-aged general population in northern Italy: the Vobarno Study.

The aim was to determine, in a cross-sectional study, the relation between structural alterations in the heart and carotid arteries, and blood pressure (BP) changes from day to night time, measured by ambulatory BP (ABP). In 225 untreated subjects (107 F, 118 M, age range 48-64 years) and 59 treated subjects (24 M, 35 F, age range 50-64), living in a small town of northern Italy (Vobarno, Brescia) carotid intima media thickness as well as the occurrence of plaque, were evaluated by ultrasound. Echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) mass was measured according to the Penn Convention. BP was determined by clinic measurement and by 24-h non-invasive ABP monitoring. Subjects were divided in two groups, according to the decrease of night time systolic BP (SBP) "dippers" (SBP decreased by at least 10% during night time) and "non-dippers" (decrease of night time SBP <10%). The intima-media thickness in the common carotid, in the carotid bifurcation, in the internal carotid artery and average intima-media thickness were significantly greater in untreated non-dippers as compared with dipper subjects (ANOVA P < 0.05). A significantly higher prevalence of plaque was observed in untreated non-dippers as compared with dippers (P = 0.002). After adjusting for age, sex, 24-h SBP, and smoking, IMT in the carotid bifurcation and average intima-media thickness remained significantly greater in non-dipper subjects (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). No significant differences in LV mass were observed between dippers and non-dipper subjects. In conclusion, in a general population of unselected middle-aged subjects, night time BP values, among other risk factors, seem to represent an important determinant of carotid wall structure.     

Arterial Disease in Dipper and Nondipper Hypertensive Patients

Carotid artery and small vessel structural changes were evaluated in 45 dipper and 45 nondipper hypertensive subjects matched for sex, age, body mass index, smoking habit, and serum lipids. Patients underwent carotid ultrasonography to evaluate lumen diameter, intima-media thickness, cross-sectional area, and atherosclerotic plaques, and plethysmographic examination to record minimum forearm vascular resistance. In the whole study population, carotid cross-sectional area and prevalence of atherosclerotic plaques tended to be higher in nondippers than in dippers (19.9 ± 6.0 v 17.5 ± 6.1 mm², P = .07, and 40% v 26%, P = .18), whereas intima-media thickness and minimum forearm vascular resistance were significantly higher in nondippers than in dippers (0.89 ± 0.12 v 0.8 ± 0.15 mm, P < .02, and 2.53 ± 0.3 v 2.34 ± 0.3 arbitrary resistance units (RU), P < .02). When gender was taken into account, different results were obtained in men and women. In men, vascular characteristics were not significantly different between dippers and nondippers. In women, carotid cross-sectional area and prevalence of atherosclerotic plaques tended to be higher in nondippers than in dippers (18.3 ± 4.9 v 15.5 ± 4.5 mm², P = .06, and 40% v 15%, P = .15), and intima-media thickness and minimum forearm vascular resistance were significantly higher in nondippers than in dippers both before (0.84 ± 0.1 v 0.73 ± 0.1 mm, P < .01, and 2.38 ± 0.3 v 2.16 ± 0.2 RU, P < .01) and after adjustment for 24-h blood pressure. In conclusion, our data suggest that the progression of vascular disease may be differently affected in the two sexes by a different circadian blood pressure profile.     

老年高血压昼夜节律及颈动脉粥样硬化与认知功能损害的关系

目的探讨老年高血压患者24h动态血压节律及颈动脉粥样硬化对认知功能损害的影响。方法依据WHO/ISH高血压诊断标准、动态血压及颈动脉超声监测,将428例受试者按24h动态血压节律类型及有无颈动脉硬化分为4组:杓型高血压组(105例);杓型高血压加颈动脉硬化组(108例);非杓型高血压组(106例);非杓型高血压加颈动脉硬化组(109例)。用简易智能状态检查表(MMSE)对所有受试者进行认知功能调查,MMSE总分范围0～30分。结果非杓型高血压加颈动脉硬化组MMSE(24.7±1.6)分与杓型高血压加颈动脉硬化组(26.4±1.4)分及非杓型高血压组(26.6±1.3)分比较,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05),非杓型高血压加颈动脉硬化组与杓型高血压组(28.9±0.9)分比较,差异有显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论血压昼夜节律减弱或消失与老年高血压患者的认知功能损害相关,颈动脉粥样硬化的形成对认知功能损害有协同作用。     

Hypertensive response to exercise in dipper and non-dipper normotensive diabetics

Non-dipper blood pressure (NDP) as an indicator of autonomic dysfunction could be associated with hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) in diabetic patients. HRE was determined as a predictor of development of unborn hypertension. We aimed to investigate if any correlation among NDP and HRE in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients. A total of 59 consecutive type 2 diabetic patients without history of hypertension and with normal blood pressure (BP) on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were enrolled to the study. We divided the study population in to two groups depending on their BP on ABPM as dipper (group 1) or non-dipper (group 2). There were 22 patients (mean age 49.5?±?7 and 10 male) in group 1 and 37 patients (mean age 53.1?±?10 and 14 male) in group 2. Daytime diastolic and mean BP of dippers and night time systolic and mean BP of non-dippers were significantly higher. HRE was not significantly different between groups (59% vs. 62%, p?=?0.820). Hemodynamic parameters during the exercise test were similar. At multivariate linear regression analysis, resting office systolic blood pressure (SBP) (r?=?0.611, p?r?=?0.266, p?=?0.002) and age (r?=?0.321, p?=?0.010) were independently correlated with peak exercises SBP. Logistic regression analyses identified the resting office SBP (OR 1.191, 95% CI 1.080–1.313; p?p?=?0.012) were independent predictors of HRE. This study revealed that HRE is not related with non-dipper BP in diabetic patients. This study could inspire to further studies to explore the main reasons of HRE in diabetes mellitus.     

Clinical trial of arotinolol in the treatment of hypertension: dippers vs. non-dippers.

To compare the effects of an alpha, beta blocker, arotinolol, in the treatment of essential hypertension between patients with a dipper and those with a non-dipper profile by means of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), a multicenter single blind parallel trial was carried out in five clinical centers. After a one-week single blind placebo run-in period, the patients underwent ABPM if their clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ranged from 90-109 mmHg and their clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) was <180 mmHg. They were divided into two groups according to the absence (non-dipper group, 24 cases) or presence (dipper group, 23 cases) of nocturnal BP reduction > or =10% of daytime BP. ABPM was measured again at the end of the active treatment phase. All patients were given Arotinolol 10-20 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. Twenty four-hour systolic and diastolic average BPs (MSBP, MDBP), 24-h systolic and diastolic blood pressure load (LS BP, LDBP), daytime systolic and diastolic average BPs (dMSBP, dMDBP), daytime systolic and diastolic blood pressure load (dLSBP, dLDBP), nighttime systolic and diastolic average BPs (nMSBP, nMDBP) and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressure load (nLSBP, nLDBP) were calculated. Arotinolol was effective in 78.2% of dippers and 54.2% of non-dippers, but the difference in effectiveness between these groups was not statistically significant. After treatment, SBP and DBP-including 24-h, daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic BPs- were significantly reduced in both groups. During the daytime period, the systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced in both dippers and non-dippers, while nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced only in the non-dipper group. No significant changes were found in the dipper group over this period. In conclusion, Arotinolol, which can be dosed twice daily, is an effective antihypertensive agent which effectively lowers blood pressure during the day while reducing nighttime blood pressure more in non-dippers than in dippers, without excessive lowering blood pressure in the latter.     

Sleep actigraphy in hypertensive patients with the 'non-dipper' blood pressure profile

Several prospective studies have demonstrated a higher cardiovascular complication rate in patients with a non-dipping compared with a dipping blood pressure profile. However, the extent of blood pressure reduction during sleep can be highly variable in an individual patient, and a repeat ambulatory blood pressure study commonly shows a change in category. The reasons for this variability are not clear. In general, hypertensive patients with a non-dipper blood pressure profile have higher actigraphy-measured activity during time in bed than dipper hypertensive patients but no analysis of actigraphy-determined sleep parameters has been published. We therefore prospectively studied 52 hypertensive patients who were off antihypertensive drugs for at least 3 weeks and who underwent simultaneous ambulatory and wrist actigraphy monitoring. All patients were clinically free of any sleep-related disorder. The blood pressure profile was labelled dipper when the change in mean awake blood pressure to sleep blood pressure was 10% or higher and non-dipper if less than 10%. Overall activity levels were higher during the time in bed in the non-dipper group compared with the dipper group. An inverse relationship of daytime activity with age was seen in men (r = -0.54, P = 0.001) but not in women (r = -0.06, P = 0.79). Both groups of hypertensive patients had a similar total time in bed (458 +/- 92 min, in dippers and 433 +/- 106 min in non-dippers, P = 0.39). Sleep latency (time to onset of sleep after getting into bed) was a median of 7 min in dippers and 15 min in non-dippers (P = 0.10). In addition, dipper hypertensives spent more of the time in bed asleep than non-dippers (87% vs 76%, P = 0.004). Logistic regression analysis revealed that body mass index, kg/m(2) (OR, 1.3), and night-time activity (units/min) (OR, 1.1) were predictive of a non-dipping blood pressure profile. These data show a possible disturbance of sleep in non-dipper hypertensive patients.     

Age-Related Differences in the Mechanism of Nondipping Among Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

The frequency of nondipper (those lacking the normal drop in nocturnal blood pressure [BP]) is high in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). The objective of this study is to investigate age-related differences in the nocturnal BP profile of patients with OSAS. The study subjects included 214 patients with polysomnography-diagnosed OSAS. The status of dipper or nondipper was determined by 24-hour ambulatory BP measurements. We divided the subjects into three groups by age (younger, middle-aged, and elderly) and compared the frequency and sleep profiles of nondippers in the different age groups. The prevalence of nondippers was significantly higher in the elderly OSAS group than in the younger and middle-aged OSAS groups (69% vs. 45%, 47%; P < .05). In the younger OSAS group, nondippers, when compared with dippers, were characterized by higher apnea–hypopnea index (AHI, 48.2 ± 27.1 vs. 37.4 ± 23.0 times/h, P < .05), whereas in the middle-aged and elderly OSAS groups, the AHI of nondippers was almost identical to that of dippers. On the other hand, in the elderly OSAS group, nondippers, when compared with dippers, had shorter periods of slow wave sleep as measured by nonrapid eye movement stage 3–4, whereas nondippers and dippers in the other two age groups were not different in terms of slow wave sleep. These results indicate age-related differences in major mechanisms leading to nondipping. Severe apnea causes nondipping only in young OSAS patients, whereas disturbance of sleep quality plays a more important role in elderly OSAS patients.