Motor cortex stimulation for post-stroke pain using neuronavigation and evoked potentials: report of 3 cases

Although motor cortex stimulation (MCS) has been accepted as an effective therapeutic option for central pain, the efficacy of MCS widely varies among previous reports. In this report, we describe our recent trial for successful MCS in 3 patients with central pain due to cerebral stroke. Medical treatments were transiently effective, but gradually became ineffective in all of the cases. During surgery, the appropriate cortical target was determined by using neuronavigation, somatosensory evoked potential (SEP), and motor evoked potential (MEP). A flat, four-plate electrode was positioned on the dura mater parallel to the motor cortex. After surgery, pain almost resolved in 2 of 3 patients and markedly improved in another. The pain relief depended on their motor function. These findings strongly suggest that both patient selection and intraoperative monitoring for targeting the motor cortex are quite important for successful MCS, although further studies were essential.     

Chronic motor cortex stimulation for phantom limb pain: correlations between pain relief and functional imaging studies

Chronic motor cortex stimulation (CMCS) has provided satisfactory control of pain in patients with central or trigeminal neuropathic pain. We used this technique in 3 patients with intractable phantom limb pain after upper limb amputation. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) correlated to anatomical MRI permitted frameless image guidance for electrode placement. Pain control was obtained for all the patients initially and the relief was stable in 2 of the 3 patients at 2 year follow-up. CMCS can be used to relieve phantom limb pain. fMRI data are useful in assisting the neurosurgeon in electrode placement for this indication.     

Neuronavigation combined with electrophysiological monitoring for surgery of lesions in eloquent brain areas in 42 cases: a retrospective comparison of the neurological outcome and the quality of resection with a control group with similar lesions.

The purpose of this study was to achieve a more radical resection of tumors in the area of the motor cortex via minimal craniotomy using a combination of neuronavigation and neurophysiological monitoring with direct electrical cortical stimulation and to compare retrospectively the clinical outcome and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging with a control group that was operated on in our service when the combination of these monitoring techniques was not available. A total of 42 patients with tumors in or near the central region underwent surgery with neuronavigation guidance and neurophysiological monitoring. The primary motor cortex was identified intraoperatively by the somatosensory evoked phase reversal method and direct cortical stimulation. The functional areas were transferred into the neuronavigation system. By stimulating the identified primary motor cortex and displaying the motor area in the operating microscope a permanent control of the motor function was possible during the whole operation. Using these techniques a more radical tumor resection - evaluated by postoperative MRI - was achieved in the study group (p = 0.04) and also a trend toward a better neurological outcome.     

Recording of corticospinal evoked potential for optimum placement of motor cortex stimulation electrodes in the treatment of post-stroke pain

The corticospinal motor evoked potential (MEP) evoked by motor cortex stimulation was investigated as an intraoperative index for the placement of stimulation electrodes in the epidural space over the motor cortex for the treatment of post-stroke pain. A grid of plate electrodes was placed in the epidural space to cover the motor cortex, sensory cortex, and premotor cortex employing a magnetic resonance imaging-guided neuronavigation system in two patients with severe post-stroke pain in the right extremities, a 66-year-old man with dysesthesia manifesting as burning and aching sensation, and a 67-year-old woman with dysesthesia manifesting as pricking sensation. The D-wave of the corticospinal MEP was recorded with a flexible wire electrode placed in the epidural space of the spinal cord during anodal monopolar stimulation of each plate electrode under general anesthesia. The grid electrode was fixed in position with dural sutures and the craniotomy closed. The effect of pain reduction induced by anodal monopolar stimulation of the same plate electrodes was examined using the visual analogue scale (VAS) on a separate day in the awake state without anesthesia. Comparison of the percentage VAS reduction and the recorded amplitude of the D-wave employing the same stimulation electrode revealed significant correlations in Case 1 (r = 0.828, p < 0.01) and Case 2 (r = 0.807, p < 0.01). The grid electrode was then replaced with two RESUME electrodes over the hand and foot areas, and the optimum positions were identified by D-wave recording before electrode fixation. Both patients reported satisfactory pain alleviation with lower stimulation voltages than usually required for patients with similar symptoms. These results indicate the potential of D-wave recording as an intraoperative indicator for the placement of stimulating electrodes over the motor cortex for pain relief.     

Neuronavigation-guided endoscopic surgery for pineal tumors with hydrocephalus.

We have applied the neuronavigation system to endoscopic biopsy and third ventriculostomy in the management of patients with a pineal tumor with hydrocephalus. With the guidance of neuronavigation, the two optimal sites of burr hole and trajectories were planned preoperatively, and the advancing endoscopic device was monitored in real time during the procedure. In our five patients, the diameters of the tumors were 2-3 cm, and the mean systemic accuracy of registration with neuronavigation was 1.2 mm. The biopsy and third ventriculostomy were performed successfully via the respective optimal burr hole and the trajectory determined using preoperative neuronavigation. There were no procedure-related complications, and none of the patients needed another procedure for CSF diversion during the follow-up periods. We present our technique which includes the application of the neuronavigation system to the biopsy and third ventriculostomy in pineal tumor with associated hydrocephalus. This technique can be performed using a simple rigid endoscope via the determined optimal entries and trajectories. The optimal preoperative planning and the intraoperative guidance by neuronavigation are thought to be able to give more chances to minimize the brain injury related to movements or deviation of endoscopic device.     

Ultrasound-based navigation during intracranial burr hole procedures: experience in a series of 100 cases

BACKGROUND: To establish a rational basis for intraoperative ultrasound guidance in neurosurgical procedures via a single burr hole approach based on the experience of one hundred cases. METHODS: The single burr hole approach is carried out using a bayonet-shaped ultrasound transducer with a tip dimension of 8 x 8 mm. The ultrasound probe with a mounted puncture adapter fits a standard burr hole and allows real-time imaging of the ongoing surgical steps.RESULTS: One hundred cases with five indications have been operated on so far: tapping of the ventricular system (46 patients), tapping of intracranial cysts (23 patients), biopsy of intracranial tumors (15 patients), evacuation of intracranial abscesses (9 patients), and evacuation of intracerebral hematomas (7 patients). Depending on their size, the ventricles could be clearly visualized in 34 of 46 patients. In the remaining patients the free margin of the falx served as orientation. Two ventricles could neither be visualized nor entered. Visualization and puncture of intracranial cysts were easy to achieve throughout, as was the case with abscesses. Tumor biopsy was unsuccessful in two patients harboring lymphomas at distances of more than 50 mm from probe to target. Intracerebral hematomas were easily visualized but, due to the presence of clots, aspiration was impossible in two patients. One patient with a giant glioblastoma died the day after the uneventful biopsy due to increased cerebral edema. No other complications occurred.CONCLUSIONS: The presented method of ultrasound-based neuronavigation is an easy-to-use, fast, and safe technique of real-time imaging for free-hand single burr hole procedures.     

Efficacy of motor cortex stimulation for intractable central neuropathic pain: comparison of stimulation parameters between post-stroke pain and other central pain

Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) has now become the preferred option for neurosurgical management of intractable central neuropathic pain such as post-stroke pain and trigeminal neuropathic pain. However, the efficacy of MCS for other central neuropathic pain such as pain resulting from spinal cord or brainstem lesions is unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 11 consecutive patients with intractable central neuropathic pain who underwent MCS in our institution. Eight patients had poststroke pain caused by thalamic hemorrhage (n = 5) or infarction (n = 3) (thalamic group). Two patients had postoperative neuropathic pain caused by spinal cord lesions, and one patient had facial pain caused by a brainstem lesion associated with multiple sclerosis (brainstem-spinal group). Visual analog scale and stimulation parameters were evaluated at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. MCS was effective for six of eight patients in the thalamic group, and all three patients in the brainstem-spinal group. These efficacies continued for 6 months after surgery without significant change in the stimulation parameters compared with the parameters at 1 month in both groups. The mean amplitude at 1 month and frequency at 6 months after surgery were significantly higher in the brainstem-spinal group than the thalamic group, although the patient number was small. MCS is effective for other central neuropathic pain, but higher intensity stimulation parameters may be necessary to gain adequate pain reduction.     

Efficacy and safety of motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: critical review of the literature

OBJECT: The authors systematically reviewed the published literature to evaluate the efficacy of and adverse effects after motor cortex stimulation (MCS) for chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS: A search of the PubMed database (1991-2006) using the key words "motor cortex," "stimulation," and "pain" yielded 244 articles. Only original nonduplicated articles were selected for further analysis; 14 studies were identified for critical review. All were series of cases and none was controlled. The outcomes in 210 patients were assessed and expressed as the percentage of patients that improved with the procedure. Results A good response to MCS (pain relief > or = 40-50%) was observed in approximately 55% of patients who underwent surgery and in 45% of the 152 patients with a postoperative follow-up > or = 1 year. Visual analog scale scores were provided in 76 patients, revealing an average 57% improvement in the 41 responders. A good response was achieved in 54% of the 117 patients with central pain and 68% of the 44 patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain. Adverse effects were reported in 10 studies, including 157 patients. Infections (5.7%) and hardware-related problems (5.1%) were relatively common complications. Seizures occurred in 19 patients (12%) in the early postoperative period, but no chronic epilepsy was reported. Conclusions The results of the authors' review of the literature suggest that MCS is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. Results must be considered with caution, however, as none of the trials were blinded or controlled. Studies with a better design are mandatory to confirm the efficacy of MCS for chronic neuropathic pain.     

Accuracy of customized miniature stereotactic platforms

In this study, a new system was evaluated for implanting deep-brain stimulators based on a one-piece platform for each trajectory customized from a preoperative planning image. During surgery, the platform is attached to skull-implanted posts that extend through the scalp. The platform acts as a miniature stereotactic frame to provide guidance for parallel cannulas as they are advanced through a burr hole to the target. Accuracy is determined from a postoperative CT. For each implantation, the distance between the position observed in the postoperative image and the position calculated relative to the platform from the preoperative image is our measure of error. Because this measure incorporates the surgical error of electrode anchoring, brain shift between preoperative and postoperative scanning, and error in the measurement of the position of the electrode in CT, it will tend to overestimate the true error. The mean error was 2.8 mm for 20 implantations. These data reflect favorably the accuracy of this system when compared with others.     

Efficacy of motor cortex stimulation in the treatment of neuropathic pain: a randomized double-blind trial

OBJECT: In this study the authors used a double-blind protocol to assess the efficacy of motor cortex stimulation (MCS) for treating neuropathic pain. METHODS: Eleven patients with unilateral neuropathic pain (visual analog scale [VAS] score 8-10) of different origins and topography were selected for MCS. A 20-contact grid was implanted through a craniotomy centered over the motor cortex contralateral to the painful area. The motor cortex strip was identified using neuroimages, somatosensory evoked potentials, acute electrical stimulation, and corticocortical evoked potentials. Subacute therapeutic stimulation trials allowed the authors to determine the most efficient pair of contacts to use for long-term MCS. The grid was replaced with a 4-contact electrode connected to an internalized stimulator. Bipolar stimulation at a 40-Hz frequency, 90-micro sec pulse width, amplitude 2-7 V, and 1 hour in "ON" and 4 hours in "OFF" mode was used. Pain was evaluated using the VAS, Bourhis, and McGill pain scales applied each month for 1 year. At Day 60 or 90, the stimulators were turned to OFF mode for 30 days in a randomized, double-blind fashion. The statistical tool used was the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Three patients did not report improvement in the subacute trial and were excluded from long-term MCS; the remaining patients underwent long-term stimulation. Significant improvement of pain was induced by MCS (p < 0.01); this persisted during the follow-up period. Turning stimulation to OFF mode increased pain significantly (p < 0.05). Improvement at 1 year was >or= 40% (40-86%) in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Motor cortex stimulation is an efficient treatment for neuropathic pain, according to an evaluation facilitated by a double-blind maneuver. Subacute stimulation trials are recommended to determine the optimum motor cortex area to be stimulated and to identify nonresponders.     

Chronic motor cortex stimulation for phantom limb pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study: technical case report

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Chronic motor cortex stimulation has provided satisfactory control of pain in patients with central or neuropathic trigeminal pain. We used this technique in a patient who experienced phantom limb pain. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to guide electrode placement and to assist in understanding the control mechanisms involved in phantom limb pain. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 45-year-old man whose right arm had been amputated 2 years previously experienced phantom limb pain and phantom limb phenomena, described as the apparent possibility of moving the amputated hand voluntarily. He was treated with chronic motor cortex stimulation. INTERVENTION: Data from fMRI were used pre- and postoperatively to detect shoulder and stump cortical activated areas and the "virtual" amputated hand cortical area. These sites of preoperative fMRI activation were integrated in an infrared-based frameless stereotactic device for surgical planning. Phantom limb virtual finger movement caused contralateral primary motor cortex activation. Satisfactory pain control was obtained; a 70% reduction in the phantom limb pain was achieved on a visual analog scale. Postoperatively and under chronic stimulation, inhibiting effects on the primary sensorimotor cortex as well as on the contralateral primary motor and sensitive cortices were detected by fMRI studies. CONCLUSION: Chronic motor cortex stimulation can be used to relieve phantom limb pain and phantom limb phenomena. Integrated by an infrared-based frameless stereotactic device, fMRI data are useful in assisting the neurosurgeon in electrode placement for this indication. Pain control mechanisms and cortical reorganization phenomena can be studied by the use of fMRI.     

Improved Dexterity after Chronic Electrical Stimulation of the Motor Cortex for Central Pain: A Special Relevance for Thalamic Syndrome

Objectives: To demonstrate that motor cortex stimulation (MCS) could improve motor function in patients with neuropathic pain. Methods: In this prospective clinical study of 38 patients referred for MCS as treatment for their neuropathic pain, we collected any declaration of improvement in motor performance that could be attributed to MCS. Results: Ten patients (26%) declared a benefit in their motor function. Eight presented objective evidence of recovered dexterity for rapid alternating movements. A minor proportion had improvement in dystonic posture (n = 2), but none had detectable increased motor strength or tonus changes. Overall, 73% of the patients with limb ataxia declared a benefit after MCS. In 6 out of 10 patients (60%), the anatomic lesion responsible for pain was restricted to the lateral aspect of the thalamus. All of them had either clinical or electrophysiological evidence of lemniscal dysfunction (proprioceptive ataxia). No correlation was found between the scores of pain relief and the modification of motor status. The correlation between thalamic lesions and benefits in motor performance was significant (Fisher's exact test, two-tailed, p = 0.0017). Conclusions: Up to 26% of patients estimated that MCS improved their motor outcome through recovered dexterity and in cases of lateral thalamic lesions.     

Number of burr holes as independent predictor of postoperative recurrence in chronic subdural haematoma

Chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH) is one of the most frequent neurosurgical entities. Current treatment options include burr hole craniostomy, twist drill craniostomy or craniotomy. While burr hole craniostomy is the most often used technique, there are no studies analysing the use of one vs. two burr holes in respect to recurrence rates and complications. This retrospective study included 76 (age: 60 +/- 12 years) patients presenting with cSDH admitted in our institution from January 2004 to December 2005. A total of 21 (27%) patients underwent bilateral craniostomy. The patients were assessed using the Markwalder Scale (2 +/- 0.71), Glasgow Coma Scale (14 +/- 1) and measuring the haematoma thickness (1.8 +/- 0.7 cm). The decision to perform one or two burr hole was made according to the personal preference of the treating neurosurgeon. All patients underwent irrigation and placement of closed-system drainage. Out of the 97 haematoma, 63 (65%) haematomas were treated with two burr holes, whereas 34 (35%) were treated with one burr hole. Patients with one burr hole had a statistically significant (p < 0.05) higher recurrence rate (29 vs. 5%), longer average hospitalization length (11 vs. 9 days) and higher wound infection rate (9% vs. 0%). A multivariate regression analysis identified the number of holes as single predictor for postoperative recurrence rate (r(2) = 0.12; p < 0.001). In this study, the treatment of cSDH with one burr hole only is associated with a significantly higher postoperative recurrence rate, longer hospitalization length and higher wound infection rate.     

Ultrasound-guided aspiration of brain abscesses through a single burr hole.

Surgical aspiration and/or drainage of brain abscesses is considered to be the first-line treatment for abscesses larger than 25 mm. This is ususally performed with the aid of CT-guided stereotaxy. A method of ultrasound guidance is presented that allows a single burr hole approach with real-time imaging of the whole procedure. A bayonet-like shaped ultrasound probe with tip dimension of 8 x 8 mm only (EUP-NS 32, Hitachi/Ecoscan) with frequencies of 3.5 and 5 MHz is used. After placement of a burr hole the target is identified by transdural insonation, a guideline is adjusted and a mounted puncture-adapter guides the cannula towards the lesion under real-time imaging control. Up to now 12 abscesses in 10 patients were treated. Visualization was always excellent. A second aspiration had to be performed twice. One abscess did not contain enough pus to be cured by aspiration and was removed by open surgery, another could not be tapped by the blunt cannula and was aspirated under stereotactic control using a sharp trocar. Outcome was excellent in 6 patients and fair in 2 patients but this was due to the pre-existing disease. Two patients admitted in deep coma died despite an emergency operation. The presented method has proven to be a very powerful guiding tool in the surgical treatment of brain abscesses through a single burr hole approach.     

Treatment of central and neuropathic facial pain by chronic stimulation of the motor cortex: value of neuronavigation guidance systems for the localization of the motor cortex

Thirty two patients with refractory central and neuropathic pain of peripheral origin were treated by chronic stimulation of the motor cortex between May 1993 and January 1997. The mean follow-up was 27. 3 months. The first 24 patients were operated according to the technique described by Tsubokawa. The last 13 cases (8 new patients and 5 reinterventions) were operated by a technique including localization by superficial CT reconstruction of the central region and neuronavigator guidance. The position of the central sulcus was confirmed by the use of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. The somatotopic organisation of the motor cortex was established peroperatively by studying the motor responses at stimulation of the motor cortex through the dura. Ten of the 13 patients with central pain (77%) and nine of the 12 patients with neuropathic facial pain had experienced substantial pain relief (75%). One of the 3 patients with post-paraplegia pain was clearly improved. A satisfactory result was obtained in one patient with pain related to plexus avulsion and in one patient with pain related to intercostal herpes zoster. None of the patients developed epileptic seizures. The position of the stimulating poles effective on pain corresponded to the somatotopic representation of the motor cortex. The neuronavigator localization and guidance technique proved to be most useful identifying the appropriate portion of the motor gyrus. It also allowed the establishment of reliable correlations between electrophysiological-clinical and anatomical data which may be used to improve the clinical results and possibly to extend the indications of this technique.     

Chronic subdural haematomas: a comparative study of an enlarged single burr hole versus double burr hole drainage

Various surgical treatments have been proposed for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH). Herewith, we set out to compare the efficacy of an enlarged single burr hole versus double burr hole drainage for the treatment of CSDH. We studied patients with symptomatic CSDH proven by CT scan that were treated in our institute between January 2002 and January 2009. All patients were treated by an enlarged single or double burr hole drainage. A subdural drain was placed in all cases. A total of 245 patients were included in the study. Double hole drainage was performed in 156 (63.7 %) patients (group A) and an enlarged single burr hole drainage in 89 (36.3 %) patients (group B). There were nine recurrences in group A and five in group B; however, the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant relationship between recurrence rate and age, gender, bilateral haematoma and antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. There was a trend towards higher risk of recurrence for patients with residual clots on postoperative CT scan. The mean hospitalization time was 6.2 days, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. No significant difference was found between patients' outcome, as assessed by Glasgow outcome scale score, and treatment method. Enlarged single burr hole and double burr hole drainage had the same efficacy in the treatment of CSDH.     

Ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve blocks with stimulating catheters in children: a descriptive study

We describe our clinical experience of combining ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation for the insertion of subgluteal sciatic catheters in children. Ten children scheduled for lower limb surgery with a combined general anesthetic and a subgluteal sciatic catheter placement for both operative anesthesia and postoperative pain relief were studied. Under ultrasonographic guidance the sciatic catheter was placed using an 17-gauge 50-mm Arrow continuous peripheral nerve block needle and a 19-gauge stimulating catheter (Stimucath). The minimal electrical current required for muscle contraction on the stimulating needle and catheter differed widely among patients. Based on the visualization of the spread of local anesthetic during injection through the catheter, a successful prediction for the sciatic block was made in all patients. All catheters were successfully placed and provided excellent postoperative pain relief without complications.     

Motor cortex stimulation for central and peripheral deafferentation pain. Report of eight cases

The authors tested a modified motor cortex stimulation protocol for treatment of central and peripheral types of deafferentation pain. Four patients with thalamic pain and four with peripheral deafferentation pain were studied. Preoperative pharmacological tests of pain relief were performed using phentolamine, lidocaine, ketamine, thiopental, and placebo. In five patients we placed a 20- or 40-electrode grid in the subdural space to determine the best stimulation point for pain relief for a few weeks before definitive placement of a four-electrode array. In three patients, the four-electrode array was implanted in the interhemispheric fissure as a one-stage procedure to treat lower-extremity pain. In two patients with pain extending from the extremity to the trunk or hip, dual devices were implanted to drive two electrodes. Six of eight patients experienced pain reduction (two each with excellent, good, and fair relief) from motor cortex stimulation. No correlation was apparent between pharmacological test results and the effectiveness of motor cortex stimulation. Patients with peripheral deafferentation pain, including two with phantom-limb pain and two with brachial plexus injury, attained pain relief from motor cortex stimulation, with excellent results in two cases. Testing performed with a subdural multiple-electrode grid was helpful in locating the best stimulation point for pain relief. Motor cortex stimulation may be effective for treating peripheral as well as central deafferentation pain.