What is the real prevalence of the D virus infection in chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis in Romania?

Virus D hepatitis continues to represent a public health problem in the south-eastern European countries, but the spread of the D virus infection in Romania is not completely elucidated. The paper proposes to assess the prevalence of the hepatitis D virus infection in patients with HBsAg-positive chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis in Romania. A number of 219 patients with chronic hepatitis and 168 with liver cirrhosis, all testing positive for HBsAg were studied. Viral markers were determined by immunoenzymatic methods. In HBsAg-positive chronic hepatitis the prevalence of the D virus was 37.9 % and in liver cirrhosis 51.19%. The great majority of the cases infected with hepatitis B virus were HBeAg-negative. These findings situate Romania among countries with a high prevalence of the hepatitis D virus infection, but which is decreasing as compared to the data communicated by previous reports.     

Is laparoscopy an advantage in the diagnosis of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection？

AIM: To evaluate the potential of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of cirrhosis and outcome of interferon treatment in HCV-infected patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, diagnostic laparoscopy with laparoscopic liver biopsy was performed in 72 consecutive patients with chronic HCV infection. The presence or absence of cirrhosis was analyzed macroscopically by laparoscopy and microscopically by liver biopsy specimens. Clinical and laboratory data and outcome of interferon-alfa treatment were compared between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. RESULTS: Laparoscopically, cirrhosis was seen in 29.2 % (21/72) and non-cirrhosis in 70.8 % (51/72) of patients. Cirrhotic patients were significantly older with a significant longer duration of HCV infection than noncirrhotic patients. Laboratory parameters (AST, y-GT, y-globulin fraction) were measured significantly higher as well as significantly lower (prothrombin index, platelet count) in cirrhotic patients than in non-cirrhotic patients. Histologically, cirrhosis was confirmed in 11.1 % (8/72) and non cirrhosis in 88.9 % (64/72). Patients with macroscopically confirmed cirrhosis (n=21) showed histologically cirrhosis in 38.1 % (8/21) and histologically non-cirrhosis in 61.9 % (13/21). In contrast, patients with macroscopically non-cirrhosis (n=51) showed histologically non cirrhosis in all cases (51/51). Thirty-nine of 72 patients were treated with interferon-alfa, resulting in 35.9 % (14/39) patients with sustained response and 64.1 % (25/39) with non response. Non-responders showed significantly more macroscopically cirrhosis than sustained responders. In contrast, there were no significant histological differences between non-responders and sustained responders. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy is more accurate than liver biopsy in recognizing cirrhosis in patients with chronic HCV infection.Liver biopsy is the best way to assess inflammatory grade and fibrotic stage. The invasive marker for staging, prognosis and management, and treatment outcome of chronic HCV-infected patients need further research and clinical trials. Laparoscopy should be performed for recognition of cirrhosis if this parameter is found to be of prognostic and therapeutic relevance in patients with chronic HCV infection.     

Does IL28B genotyping still have a role in the era of direct‐acting antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection?

IL28B genotype has been shown to be the strongest pretreatment predictor of sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection (CHC) treated with pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV). Patients carrying the good response genotype have a two- to threefold higher chance of SVR than those with a poor response genotype, manifest as dramatically improved early viral kinetics. However, the treatment paradigm for CHC is changing with the introduction of potent direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). IL28B genotype remains relevant to both telaprevir and boceprevir treatment regimens, although the strength of association with virological response is attenuated. The association between IL28B genotype and outcomes of treatment regimens that involve peg-IFN plus combination DAA therapy, or IFN-free regimens, is currently being evaluated. IL28B genotype may remain relevant to individualizing the choice of treatment regimen in the future.     

Prevention of recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation: hepatitis B immunoglobulin,antiviral drugs,or both? Systematic review and meta‐analysis

L.H. Katz, M. Paul, D.G. Guy, R. Tur‐Kaspa. Prevention of recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation: hepatitis B immunoglobulin, antiviral drugs, or both? Systematic review and meta‐analysis.
Transpl Infect Dis 2009: 12: 292–308. All rights reserved Abstract: Objectives. To evaluate antiviral prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) following liver transplantation. Methods. Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical trials and comparative cohort studies comparing the use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg), antivirals, or both following liver transplantation for HBV infection were included. The primary outcome was reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Other outcomes included all‐cause and HBV‐related mortality, HB‐related active liver disease, and reappearance of HBV DNA after transplantation. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Results. Twenty studies (22 comparisons) were included. Ten studies compared HBIg to combination treatment, 9 compared antivirals to combination treatment, and 3 compared lamivudine (LAM) to HBIg. Combination treatment reduced HBsAg reappearance (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.12–0.66), and was superior to HBIg alone in all other outcome measures. Combination treatment was significantly better than antivirals in preventing reappearance of HBsAg (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.22–0.44), even when low‐dose HBIg was given. No significant difference was found between HBIg and LAM monotherapy for all measured outcomes. Major limitations with regard to comparability of the study groups in non‐randomized trials were revealed. Conclusions. Combination treatment with HBIg and LAM reduced HBV recurrence following liver transplantation, compared with HBIg or LAM alone, and reduced mortality compared with HBIg alone.     

HCV/ HIV co‐infection: time to re‐evaluate the role of HIV in the liver?

Summary.  Because of major advances in the treatment of HIV/AIDS, HIV-positive persons now live longer, healthier lives; however, hepatitis C virus (HCV) is increasingly recognized as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. Among HCV-infected persons, HIV co-infection is associated with increased HCV RNA levels, increased hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, and more rapid progression to cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. Compounding this problem are reduced HCV treatment response rates among HCV/HIV co-infected persons. Moreover, antiretroviral therapy used to suppress HIV replication is often associated with a paradoxical increase in HCV RNA levels, as well as hepatotoxicity. Despite the adverse clinical consequences of HCV/HIV co-infection, the mechanisms by which these two viruses interact at the cellular level remain largely unexplored. This review focuses on the evidence demonstrating direct infection of hepatocytes by HIV, as well as the indirect mechanisms by which HIV may regulate HCV replication at the cellular level. A comprehensive understanding of virus–virus and virus–cell interactions is critical to the development of novel treatment strategies to combat HCV/HIV co-infection.     

Cytometry in monoclonal B‐cell lymphocytosis and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia – The Hunting of the Snark?

Cytometry has become important in the detection and determination of risk of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis; methodology has changed, and will continue to change, as cytometric technology changes.     

Is investigation of hepatitis C virus NS5A gene heterogeneity a tool for predicting long‐lasting response to interferon therapy in patients with HCV‐1b chronic hepatitis?

Nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) may repress the interferon (IFN)-induced protein kinase R (PKR). High variability of different regions in the carboxy-terminal half of NS5A implicated in the interaction with PKR (particularly the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR)) may be a predictor of response to IFN in patients infected with genotype 1b of HCV. We examined pretreatment serum samples from 17 HCV-1b infected patients included in the same schedule of IFN therapy. Seven patients were a rare series of sustained responders (SR) with a post-treatment follow-up of 5-7 years, while ten were nonresponders (NR). The carboxy-terminal half of the NS5A gene was amplified and directly sequenced in all 17 cases. In addition, the entire NS5A gene and the part of the HCV E2 gene coding for the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) were amplified, cloned and sequenced in six cases (three NR and three SR). No difference in number and distribution of amino acid mutations was observed between isolates from SR and NR in any portion of the protein, including the ISDR region. Analysis of full length NS5A confirmed no difference between the two groups. The NS5A gene sequence was different among the six cases cloned although it appeared to be conserved in each individual patient independently of the quasispecies complexity evaluated through HVR1 examination. These data indicate that pretreatment analysis of theNS5A genomic variability has no value in predicting long-lasting response to IFN therapy in HCV-1b-infected patients, and that the HCV NS5A gene has high quasispecies homology.     

Flares in chronic hepatitis B patients induced by the host or the virus? Relation to treatment response during Peg-interferon {alpha}-2b therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Flares are a well known phenomenon during antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B. Little is known about the effect of flares on response. We investigated the timing and characteristics of flares, in relation to treatment response (hepatitis B e antigen loss). PATIENTS: A total of 266 patients, participating in a global randomised controlled study, were assigned to 52 weeks of 100 mug pegylated (Peg)-interferon alpha-2b weekly, combined with either daily lamivudine 100 mg or placebo. RESULTS: Sixty seven patients (25%) exhibited 75 flares, with 38 (51%) flares in the combination therapy and 37 (49%) in the monotherapy groups. Overall, 30% of patients with and 38% of patients without a flare responded to therapy (p = 0.25). In 24 patients (36%) the flare was followed by a decrease in hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (host induced flare). In 25 (38%) patients the flare was preceded by an increase in HBV DNA (virus induced flare). In 17 (26%) patients the flare did not meet one of these criteria (indeterminate flare). Of patients with host induced flare, 58% responded whereas only 20% of patients with virus induced flares responded (p = 0.008). Hepatitis B surface antigen loss (n = 8) was exclusively seen in patients experiencing a host induced flare. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that host induced flares was an independent predictor of response (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Flares are not more common in responders than in non-responders to Peg-interferon alpha-2b therapy. Virus induced flares, which occur after an increase in HBV DNA level, and most probably are indicative for increased expression of viral antigens, did not lead to treatment response. In contrast, host induced flares which were followed by a HBV DNA decrease were highly associated with treatment response.     

CCR△532 mutation does not influence the susceptibility to HCV infection, severity of liver disease and response to therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

AIM: To study whether CCR5Delta32 mutation was associated with viral infection and severity of liver disease. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty two histologically proven, chronic HCV patients (mean age: 41 +/- 14 years; M/F: 164/88) were genotyped. PCR based genotyping of 32 bp deletion at the CCR5 locus was done. Four-hundred and eight matched healthy controls were studied to assess susceptibility to HCV infection. To assess correlation of immune gene polymorphism with severity of HCV related liver disease, patients with chronic HCV infection were divided into those with a fibrosis score of <= 2 (mild) or > 2 (severe) and histological activity index (HAI) of <= 5 or > 5. For correlation between CCR5Delta32 mutations and response to therapy, 129 patients who completed therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: The majority (89.4%) of the patients were infected with genotype 3. The frequency of homozygous CCR5Delta32 mutants was comparable to HCV patients as compared to the healthy controls (0.7% vs 0%, P = 0.1). Further more, the frequency of CCR5Delta32 mutation was comparable in patients with mild or severe liver disease. (P = NS). There was also no association observed with response to therapy and CCR5Delta32 mutation. CONCLUSION: CCR5Delta32 mutation does not have a role in disease susceptibility, severity or response to therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection.