Cannulation of the right axillary artery for surgery of acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal choice of the arterial inflow site during operations for type A aortic dissection is not clearly defined. The aim of the prospective study was to identify whether cannulation of the right axillary artery instead of the femoral artery may improve the results of surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients were operated on because of acute type A aortic dissection from January 2000 to February 2002. The only difference in surgical strategy was the site of arterial cannulation: the right axillary artery was used in 20 patients [axillary group] and the left femoral artery in 50 patients [femoral group]. All patients had aortic surgery with open distal anastomosis during deep hypothermic arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion. The mean age was 58.7 +/- 12 years with a range from 28 to 88 years (axillary group, 56.6 +/- 13 years; femoral group, 59.4 +/- 12 years; P = 0.435). Preoperatively evident organ malperfusion was identified in five (25%) patients of the axillary group and in seven (14%) of the femoral group. RESULTS: There was no perioperative death. The hospital mortality rate was 5.0% for the axillary group and 22% for the femoral group (all patients, 17%). Major neurological complications occurred postoperatively in 5% of patients from the axillary group (one out of 20 patients) and in 8% of patients from the femoral group (four out of 50 patients) (all patients, 7%). CONCLUSION: Cannulation of the right axillary artery improved the outcome of surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. However, postoperative complications occurred after both axillary and femoral artery cannulation.     

Axillary Artery Perfusion in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair

Abstract Background: We evaluated our experience with axillary artery perfusion technique in acute type A aortic dissection repair. Methods: Between September 2000 and July 2006, 41 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection underwent surgical repair. In 35 of 41 patients (85.4%), arterial perfusion was performed through right axillary artery and in the remaining six patients (14.6%), arterial perfusion site was femoral artery. Indication for femoral artery perfusion was cardiac arrest and ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in one and pulslessness of right upper limb in five patients. Mean age was 54.9 ± 15.3 (16 to 90 years) and 28 were male. Unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (perfusate temperature 22 to 25 °C) through axillary artery was performed in all axillary artery perfused patients and in three patients who had femoral artery perfusion. Results: Five patients died postoperatively (hospital mortality 12.2%). All of them had evidence of single or multiple organ malperfusion preoperatively. We did not experience any new transient or permanent neurologic deficit after the procedure in the unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion patients. Complications related to axillary artery cannulation were observed in two patients (5.3%). One patient with femoral artery cannulation experienced femoral arterial thrombosis, postoperatively. Conclusions: Right axillary artery cannulation for repair of acute type A aortic dissection is a simple and safe procedure. In the case of pulslessness of right upper limb, femoral artery is still the choice of cannulation site.     

不同腋动脉插管方法在StanfordA型主动脉夹层手术中的应用

目的比较两种不同右侧腋动脉插管方法对Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者行主动脉弓置换术的安全性和临床效果。方法 2008年7月至2010年7月北京安贞医院对280例Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者采用右侧腋动脉插管建立体外循环(CPB),行全弓置换+降主动脉支架人工血管植入术。根据术中腋动脉插管方式将280例患者分为两组,直接插管组(n=215),年龄(43.1±9.5)岁,行直接腋动脉插管;间接插管组(n=65),年龄(44.7±8.3)岁,腋动脉连接人工血管行间接插管。观察两组患者的安全性,比较相关手术参数、临床结果和术后恢复情况。结果住院死亡10例,其中直接插管组7例(7/215,3.3%),间接插管组3例(3/65,4.6%);所有患者均成功行腋动脉插管;术后25例(25/280,8.9%)出现暂时性神经系统功能障碍,其中直接插管组19例(8.8%),间接插管组6例(9.2%),均经治疗痊愈。间接插管组患者术后腋动脉插管并发症明显少于直接插管组,差异有统计学意义((1例vs.19例,P=0.045)。两组患者体外循环期间最高流量、最高泵压,深低温停循环时间、顺行性脑灌注时间和CPB时间差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论经人工血管右侧腋动脉插管可以降低腋动脉插管相关并发症,安全用于Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者的外科手术治疗。     

Axillary versus femoral cannulation for aortic surgery: enough evidence for a general recommendation?

There is a trend towards cannulation of the axillary artery for extracorporeal circulation in patients requiring aortic arch surgery. We analyzed the published data comparing axillary and femoral cannulation for safety and outcome. End points were death; stroke, neurologic, and vascular complications; and malperfusion. Femoral cannulation is safe for extracorporeal circulation in patients without aortic arch surgery. In patients with type A dissections, malperfusion may occur owing to retrograde perfusion of the false lumen and subsequent occlusion of the origin of the supra aortic vessels. Cannulation of the axillary/subclavian artery results in antegrade flow, at least in the right carotid artery, with the possibility of antegrade cerebral perfusion during aortic arch repair. There was a trend towards improved neurologic outcome when the axillary artery was used for extracorporeal circulation in such patients. When different techniques were compared, the use of a side graft for axillary cannulation reduced the complication rate. The lack of randomized trials and the high variety of inclusion criteria in the different studies do not allow a general recommendation for the use of the axillary artery as cannulation site.     

Left axillary artery perfusion in surgery of type A aortic dissection

PURPOSE: A left axillary artery perfusion instead of a femoral perfusion has the benefit of avoiding false lumen perfusion and atheroembolization into the brain, which is caused by retrograde perfusion in type A aortic dissection surgery. We performed type A aortic dissection surgery using the left axillary artery perfusion technique and reviewed this method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2002 to January 2004, 8 patients with a mean age of 70 years (48 to 81), underwent axillary artery cannulation with a side graft technique in type A aortic dissection operations. Six patients had acute type A and 2 had chronic type A dissections. The surgical procedures were ascending aortic replacement in 5, hemiarch replacement in 2, and total arch replacement in 1. RESULTS: In all patients, a cardiopulmonary bypass was established through the left axillary perfusion. There were no operative deaths and no hospital deaths. All patients were able to avoid cerebral vascular accidents. One patient required a femoro-femoro bypass on the 10th postoperative day because of malperfusion of the left leg, which occurred suddenly. Postoperative hemorrhaging requiring resternotomy occurred in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: A left axillary artery perfusion is safe and useful for arterial inflow for type A aortic dissection surgery.     

Detection and monitoring of complications associated with femoral or axillary arterial cannulation for surgical repair of aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES: Femoral arterial perfusion can be associated with complications, and axillary arterial perfusion is not free from risk. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence and complications of femoral versus axillary artery cannulation for surgical repair of aortic dissection and to devise a strategy for early detection and monitoring of complications using transesophageal echocardiography, near-infrared spectroscopy, and orbital Doppler. DESIGN: Retrospective and observational. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-five consecutive patients with aortic dissection who underwent aortic repair between 1995 and 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Aortic surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 44 cases with femoral arterial perfusion, sudden onset of hypotension occurred in 3 cases but was immediately treated based on the TEE diagnosis (collapse of true lumen in the descending aorta). In another case, myocardial ischemia occurred because of occlusion of the coronary artery. These four cases comprised 57.1% of 7 patients with type III dissection with retrograde extension in whom femoral arterial perfusion was used. However, malperfusion was not encountered in 3 cases of the same type of dissection but with axillary arterial perfusion. Axillary artery perfusion (29 cases) led to malperfusion of the right frontal lobe and coronary artery in 1 case each. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible management guided by real-time information is essential. Upon initiating femoral arterial perfusion, malperfusion should first be checked for in the descending aorta and then in the coronary and visceral arteries, especially in cases of type III dissection with retrograde extension. Attention should be paid to cerebral and coronary malperfusion when initiating axillary arterial perfusion.     

Rapid and safe establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass in repair of acute aortic dissection: improved results with double cannulation

There is no agreement at present as to which is the optimal site for artery cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass in repair of acute aortic dissection (AAD). We have employed right axillary artery cannulation (RAAC) in combination with femoral artery cannulation to overcome the drawbacks of single cannulation. From January 2000 to August 2006, 88 patients underwent emergency surgical repair of the aortic arch (mean age 65+/-13 years, 37 men) for AAD. All operations were performed under hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion. Preoperatively, nine patients were in shock and 18 patients showed malperfusion. The average duration of circulatory arrest was 52+/-17 min and that of myocardial ischemia was 135+/-53 min. Total aortic arch replacement was done in 47 patients and hemiarch aortic replacement in 41. The hospital mortality rate was 2.3% (2 of 88); the fatal cases were among those who were in shock preoperatively. The perioperative stroke rate was 5.7% (5 of 88). The hospital mortality rate of the 25 patients with preoperative malperfusion was 4.0% (1 of 25); the fatal case had coronary malperfusion. Our approach for AAD was associated with a low mortality even in patients with malperfusion.     

Operation on acute type A aortic dissection using transapical aortic cannulation

We experienced a case of operation for acute type A aortic dissection using transapical aortic cannulation (TAC). A 62-year-old male with chest and back pain admitted to our hospital. The chest computed tomography (CT) showed the dissection of total aorta. Hemiarch repair (circulatory arrest time: 64 min, pump time: 152 min) was performed by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) established with bicaval cannulation and TAC in this case. The reason why we use TAC is that retrograde perfusion by femoral artery has a high-risk of malperfusion and cerebral embolism because of atheromatous change in aorta, and the use of the axillary artery can be troublesome because of the vessel's small diameter. We considered that in cases of acute aortic dissection, TAC is much safer and simpler than femoral or axillary cannulation.     

Axillary artery cannulation in type a aortic dissection operations.

BACKGROUND: Femoral arteries are the preferred site of peripheral cannulation for arterial inflow in type A aortic dissection operations. The presence of aortoiliac aneurysms, severe peripheral occlusive disease, atherosclerosis of the femoral vessels, and distal extension of the aortic dissection may preclude their utilization. Axillary artery cannulation may represent a valid alternative in these circumstances. METHODS: Between January 15, 1989, and August 20, 1998, in our institution, 22 of 152 operations (14.4%) for acute type A aortic dissection were performed with the use of the axillary artery for the arterial inflow. Axillary artery cannulation was undertaken in the presence of femoral arteries bilaterally compromised by dissection in 12 patients (54.5%), abdominal aorta and peripheral aneurysm in 5 patients (22.7%), severe atherosclerosis of both femoral arteries in 3 patients (13. 6%), and aortoiliac occlusive disease in 2 patients (9.1%). In all patients, distal anastomosis was performed with an open technique after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Retrograde cerebral perfusion was used in 9 patients (40.9%). RESULTS: Axillary artery cannulation was successful in all patients. The left axillary artery was cannulated in 20 patients (90.9%), and the right axillary artery was cannulated in 2 patients (9.1%). Axillary artery cannulation followed an attempt of femoral artery cannulation in 15 patients (68. 2%). All patients survived the operation, and no patient had a cerebrovascular accident. No axillary artery thrombosis, no brachial plexus injury, and no intraoperative malperfusion were recorded in this series. Two patients (9.1%) died in the hospital of complications not related to axillary artery cannulation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type A aortic dissection in whom femoral arteries are acutely or chronically diseased, axillary artery cannulation represents a safe and effective means of providing arterial inflow during cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Safety and efficacy of ascending aorta cannulation during repair of acute type A aortic dissection (PA29-04): “Presented at the 65th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery”

Objective

Antegrade central perfusion for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection prevents malperfusion and retrograde cerebral embolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. Prompt establishment of antegrade perfusion via the ascending aorta may improve surgical results of type A dissections, especially in situations of hemodynamic instability. Thus, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of cannulation of the dissected ascending aorta in acute type A dissection.

Methods

We reviewed the medical charts of patients undergoing repair of acute ascending aortic dissection (n = 52) from April 2010 to April 2013. Cannulation was accomplished in 29 patients via the ascending aorta (central) and in 23 patients via the femoral or axillary artery (peripheral). The ascending aorta was routinely cannulated using Seldinger technique under epiaortic ultrasound guidance. Comorbidities, mortality, complications, and durations of hospital stays were compared for the groups.

Results

In all cases, routine cannulation of the ascending aorta was safely performed with no resultant malperfusion or thromboembolism. Mean operative duration, cardiopulmonary bypass time, intubation time, and intensive care unit stay were significantly shorter in the central group. Two patients (6.8 %) in the central group died compared with four patients (17.3 %) in the peripheral group (P = 0.005).

Conclusions

Antegrade central perfusion via the ascending aorta, a simple and safe technique that enables rapid establishment of antegrade systemic perfusion, was as safe as peripheral cannulation in patients with type A acute aortic dissection.     

Ascending aorta cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection

Objective: Antegrade perfusion for type A acute aortic dissection prevents malperfusion and retrograde cerebral embolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. Prompt establishment of antegrade perfusion via ascending aorta may improve the surgical results of type A dissections, especially in the situations of hemodynamic instability. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy of use of the dissected ascending aorta as an alternative arterial inflow. Methods: Between 2002 and 2006, 32 patients underwent prosthetic graft replacement of the ascending aorta or hemiarch for acute type A aortic dissection. The ascending aorta was routinely cannulated, in addition to the femoral artery, with a heparin-coating flexible cannula for arterial inflow, using Seldinger technique, and by epiaortic ultrasonographic guidance (n = 6). Antegrade systemic perfusion via ascending aorta was performed. Results: Ascending aorta cannulation was safely performed in all cases. There was no malperfusion or thromboembolism due to ascending aorta cannulation. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established within 30 min after skin incision. There was one in-hospital death due to duodenal bleeding (1/32 = 3.1%), two cases of cerebral infarction (2/32 = 6.3%), and one case of pulmonary embolism. Twenty-nine patients (29/32 = 90.6%) were discharged in New York Heart Association class I and have been followed up uneventfully for a mean of 17 months. Conclusions: Antegrade perfusion via the ascending aorta was successfully performed with low mortality and morbidity. With ultrasound-guided Seldinger technique, ascending aorta cannulation has a potential to be a simple and safe option that enables rapid establishment of antegrade systemic perfusion in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.     

Femoral cannulation is safe for type A dissection repair

Background

Recently, surgeons have embraced axillary artery cannulation for type A aortic dissection repair out of concern for malperfusion phenomena with traditional femoral artery cannulation. My colleagues and I sought to determine whether these concerns are justified.

Methods

Records of 86 consecutive patients (51 men and 35 women; age, 30 to 86 years; mean, 62 years) undergoing surgical repair for acute type A dissection were reviewed. Cannulation site, specific operative repair, and complications related to cannulation were noted.

Results

Seventy-nine cannulations were performed in the femoral artery (47 left, 23 right, and 9 unspecified), 3 in the axillary artery (1 left and 2 right), and 4 in the ascending aorta or arch. Deep hypothermic arrest was used in 64 operations. Seven involved re-sternotomy. Seventy patients had supracoronary grafts (2 with valve replacement and 10 with valve resuspension), and 16 underwent aortic root replacement. Fourteen patients were in shock from cardiac tamponade. Eighty patients survived the operation, and 71 were hospital survivors. Malperfusion on initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass was noted in 3 patients. In 1, the original cannulation site was the ascending aorta, and the cannula was moved to the femoral artery for correction. In 2, the original cannulation site was the femoral artery, and the cannula was moved to the ascending aorta. Malperfusion on clamping of the aorta or on resumption of aortic flow was noted in no patient. Postoperative ischemia of any vascular bed was noted locally only in 3 (cannulated) lower extremities.

Conclusions

Straight femoral cannulation for all phases of type A dissection repair is appropriate and yields excellent clinical results. The anticipated malperfusion events are actually rare (2 of 79 with femoral artery cannulation, or 2.5%).     

Arch and descending aortic aneurysms: influence of perfusion technique on neurological outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Although cannulation of the femoral artery is used routinely for thoracic aortic operations with hypothermic circulatory arrest, retrograde perfusion through the descending aorta carries the risk of cerebral malperfusion or embolism. We have, therefore, routinely used a central cannulation technique for distal arch and descending aortic operations since 1995. In this study, we compared neurological outcome in consecutive patients undergoing femoral versus ascending aortic perfusion for these aneurysms. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1998, 61 patients underwent aortic resection with circulatory arrest, but without retrograde cerebral perfusion, for lesions of the aortic arch and descending aorta. Thirty-one patients had fusiform true aneurysms, 19 had aortic dissection and 11 had extensive saccular or false aneurysms. Thirty-two patients (52%) were perfused via the femoral artery (group A), and 29 patients (48%) from the ascending aorta (group B). Operative mortality and morbidity, and neurological outcome, were reviewed. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in mean age, pathology, abdominal and peripheral vascular disease, net perfusion time, or circulatory arrest time. There were four hospital deaths (three in group A and one in group B; P = 0.61), including one neurological death in group A, group A suffered a higher incidence of neurological events (nine patients: 28%) than group B (two patients: 7%; P = 0.03). Temporary focal neurological deficits occurred in both groups (two patients in group A, 6% and two patients in group B, 7%; P > 0.99), but permanent injury occurred exclusively in group A (seven patients: four with monoplegia, one with hemiplegia, and two with diffuse cerebral injury with one death; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Anterograde perfusion using a proximal aortic cannula provides a low risk of cerebral embolism and allows extensive aortic resection with low morbidity.     

Cannulation of the Extrathoracic Left Common Carotid Artery for Thoracic Aorta Operations Through Left Posterolateral Thoracotomy

The femoral artery is the usual site of arterial cannulation in thoracic aorta operations through left posterolateral thoracotomy that require cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). The advantage of this perfusion route is in limiting the duration of circulatory arrest. It is associated, however, with the risk of retrograde embolization or, in cases involving aortic dissection, malperfusion of vital organs. To prevent these risks, we have used the extrathoracic left common carotid artery as the perfusion route. From December 1999 to January 2003, we used cannulation of the left extrathoracic common carotid artery in 42 thoracic aorta operations through posterolateral thoracotomy with an open proximal anastomosis technique during DHCA. The indication for thoracic aortic repair was atherosclerotic ulcer in 7 cases, chronic aortic aneurysm in 18, acute type B dissection in 5, and chronic type B dissection in 12. Cannulation of the extrathoracic left common carotid artery was successful in all patients. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with no cerebrovascular events in all cases. No cannulation-related complications were observed. One patient died from cardiac insufficiency on postoperative day 5. No peripheral neurological deficits (paraplegia or paraparesis) were observed. Postoperative complications included atrial fibrillation in five patients, reoperation to control hemorrhage in six, respiratory insufficiency in nine, and renal insufficiency in six. These results indicate that cannulation of the left extrathoracic common carotid artery is a useful, reliable method for proximal perfusion during CPB in patients undergoing repair of the descending thoracic aorta through left posterolateral thoracotomy. By providing effective perfusion of the brain, this technique can prolong safe DHCA time. Another advantage is the prevention of cerebral emboli, ensuring retrograde flow to the aortic arch.Presented at the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Société de Chirurgie Vasculaire de Langue Française, Toulouse, France, May 21-24, 2003.     

Is the axillary artery a suitable cannulation site in aortic surgery?

AIM: The axillary artery is currently gaining interest as an alternative to femoral artery cannulation in aortic surgery. It was the aim of our study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of axillary artery cannulation in a series of patients undergoing surgery of the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch. METHODS: From 1998 to 2002 cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) perfusion via the axillary artery was intended in 35 patients (28 male), median age 61 (22-77) years. The underlying disease was acute aortic dissection type A in 22/35 (63%), chronic aortic dissection type A in 2/35 (6%), ascending aortic aneurysm in 8/35 (22%), aortic regurgitation after previous ascending aortic replacement in 1/35 (3%), pseudoaneurysm after Bentall operation in 1/35 (3%) and coronary artery disease with severe arteriosclerosis of the aorta in 1/35 (3%). RESULTS: Conversion to femoral artery or ascending aortic cannulation was necessary in 3 patients. In the other cases, adequate CPB flows of 2.4 l/m2/min were achieved. In 1 case local dissection of the axillary artery occurred after emergency cannulation. No postoperative complications related to axillary artery cannulation, such as upper extremity ischemia, brachial plexus injury, or local wound infection occurred. No new postoperative stroke was noted, hospital mortality was 4/35 (11%) patients. CONCLUSION: Axillary artery cannulation is feasible in the majority of cases and seems to be a safe and effective method in surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Several disadvantages of femoral artery cannulation and perfusion can be avoided.     

Extrathoracic cannulation of the left common carotid artery in thoracic aorta operations through a left thoracotomy: preliminary experience in 26 patients

BACKGROUND: In aortic operations performed through a left thoracotomy, which require total bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, femoral artery cannulation is commonly used for arterial perfusion. This route limits the time of safe circulatory arrest and is associated with the risks of retrograde embolization or, in the case of aortic dissection, malperfusion of the vital organs. To overcome these problems, we have used cannulation of the extrathoracic left common carotid artery to ensure a central a route of arterial perfusion in these operations. The preliminary results are presented. METHODS: Between December 1999 and April 2001, we used left common carotid artery cannulation in 26 operations on the thoracic aorta performed through a posterolateral thoracotomy with an open technique during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. The indications included perforating atherosclerotic ulcer (n = 5), chronic aortic aneurysm (n = 9), acute type B aortic dissection (n = 3), and chronic dissection of the thoracic aorta (n = 9). Transcranial Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of both the right and left middle cerebral arteries was used to assess the adequacy of cerebral bihemispheric perfusion and to determine the differences in blood flow velocities throughout the procedure. RESULTS: Left common carotid artery cannulation was successful in all patients. All patients awoke from the operation, and none had cerebrovascular accidents. None died in the hospital, and complications related to carotid artery cannulation were not observed. None of the patients experienced postoperative paraplegia. In all patients transcranial Doppler monitoring indicated the absence of cerebral embolic phenomena throughout the entire procedure. Significant differences in middle cerebral artery flow velocities were observed at different phases of the procedures and between the right and left middle cerebral arteries during carotid cannulation and during selective cerebral perfusion. Nevertheless, the maximal drop of right middle cerebral artery blood velocity during selective perfusion through the left common carotid artery was within 50% of the left middle cerebral artery velocity, indicating adequate bihemispheric perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing aortic operations through a left thoracotomy, extrathoracic left common carotid artery cannulation was a safe and effective means of providing proximal arterial inflow during cardiopulmonary bypass, which can be used to selectively perfuse the brain, as well as to prevent embolic phenomena in the arch vessels.     

Cannulation of the innominate artery during surgery of the thoracic aorta: our experience in 55 patients.

BACKGROUND: Alternative cannulation sites such as the right/left axillary artery, the ascending aorta and aortic arch have been recently preferred to the femoral artery to improve neurologic outcome in patients undergoing surgery of the thoracic aorta. In 2004, we started to select the innominate artery as an arterial cannulation site for CPB and antegrade cerebral perfusion institution. Here we present our preliminary experience with 55 patients. METHODS: Between November 2004 and 2006, 55 patients (mean age 60+/-14 years) underwent surgery on the thoracic aorta using the innominate artery as a site for arterial cannulation. Indication for surgery was a degenerative aneurysm in 49 (89.1%), an acute type A dissection in 2 patients (3.6%), a post-dissection aneurysm in 3 (5.4%), a supravalvular aortic stenosis in 1 patient (1.8%). Operative procedure included total arch replacement (n=9), hemiarch replacement (n=6), ascending aorta replacement (n=21), Bentall procedure (n=18) and aortoplasty with patch (n=1). Mean CPB and cross clamp times were 131+/-60 and 95+/-29 min, respectively. Mean cerebral perfusion time was 54+/-26 min. RESULTS: The hospital mortality rate was 3.6%. There were no permanent neurologic dysfunction and one (1.8%) temporary neurological dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our results with the cannulation of the innominate artery were encouraging. This provides the same advantages of the axillary artery cannulation with greater simplicity and avoiding extra surgical incisions which may be site for local complications. It may represent a valid option for CPB and antegrade cerebral perfusion institution in aortic procedures.     

Lethal thrombus in the carotid artery during operation for acute aortic dissection with cerebral malperfusion

A drowsy patient with acute type A aortic dissection and cerebral malperfusion required emergency operation. Because the right carotid artery was totally obstructed, cerebral perfusion was first restored by cannulating it and the left femoral artery before midline sternotomy. However, a long fresh thrombus was found flowing backward from the obstructed carotid artery. This thrombus was removed, and both arteries were connected through a Y-shaped extracorporeal circulation circuit to reperfuse the brain. During the subsequent aortic procedure, both arteries were used for arterial inflow. Such thrombi can cause grave postoperative neurologic dysfunction. Carotid artery cannulation is mandatory in such cases.     

Technical problems and complications of axillary artery cannulation.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiopulmonary bypass via the axillary artery is frequently used especially in aortic dissections. With an increased use of this technique problems were recognized too. We describe the technical problems and complications associated with axillary artery cannulation. METHODS: Sixty-five patients underwent cannulation of the axillary artery. The indication for operation was acute aortic dissection type A in 57%, chronic aortic dissection in 8%, aortic aneurysm in 18%, pseudoaneurysm in 3%, and others in 14%. RESULTS: Technical problems and complications occurred in 14%, and in 11% the perfusion had to be switched to either femoral (n=5) or aortic cannulation (n=2). Arterial damage or dissection of the axillary artery or the aorta occurred in 0% of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 9% with direct cannulation (P=n.s.). Cannulation problems or insufficient CPB flow due to a narrow vessel occurred in 0% of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 4% with direct cannulation (P=n.s.). Malperfusion in aortic dissections occurred in 20% of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 0% with direct cannulation (P=0.016). No postoperative complications related to axillary cannulation which were evaluated by clinical examination, such as brachial plexus injury, axillary artery thrombosis or local wound infection were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although axillary artery cannulation is an attractive alternative to femoral cannulation there needs to be an alertness for technical problems. Different complications occur with either direct cannulation or the sidegraft technique and at present it remains the surgeons preference which technique for axillary artery cannulation is used.     

Off-pump complete pericardiectomy for an unusual case of annular constrictive pericarditis

The optimal cannulation site in repair of DeBakey type I aortic dissection is controversial, and malperfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass is facilitated by retrograde flow. We propose the use of a long arterial cannula through the femoral artery to achieve a proximal antegrade perfusion. The tip of the cannula is placed in the true lumen of the distal aortic arch through the common femoral artery (Seldinger technique and transesophageal echography guidance). In 9 patients, there was one case of operative mortality (cardiac death), and no cases of perioperative stroke, bowel ischemia, severe renal failure, or local complications. Proximal perfusion can achieved rapidly and through an easily accessible site.