Esophagectomy in the state of Florida: is regionalization of care warranted?

Centralization of cancer care needs to be based on evidence that regionalization will improve outcomes in a given region. We analyzed outcomes for esophagectomy performed in Florida using the Agency for Health Care Administration database. We determined the risk-adjusted mortality rate for the procedure in low-volume and high-volume centers. From 1997 to 2006, 991 esophagectomies were performed in Florida. The incidence of esophagectomy significantly increased from 1997 to 2001 compared with 2002 to 2006, and the postoperative mortality decreased in the latter time period (odds ratio [OR], 1.87; confidence interval [CI], 1.16-3.03). The risk-adjusted postoperative mortality was significantly lower (OR, 0.54; CI, 0.32-0.92) in high-volume centers (5.1 vs 10.4%). The anastomotic leak rates were 8.2 per cent in both high- and low-volume centers. In the largest population-based study for esophagectomy in Florida, outcomes are better in high-volume centers. These data support the regionalization of esophagectomy to high-volume locations in Florida to reduce procedure-related mortality.     

Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume

BACKGROUND: High-volume hospitals have been shown to have superior outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but the contribution of surgeon volume and specialty practice to CEA outcomes in a national sample is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Using the National Inpatient Sample for 1996 and 1997, 35,821 patients who underwent CEA (ICD-9-CM code 3812) and had data for unique surgeon identification were studied. Surgeons were categorized in terms of annual CEA volume as low-volume surgeons (< 10 procedures), medium-volume surgeons (10 to 29), and high-volume surgeons (> or = 30). Data from cardiac, general, neurologic, and vascular surgical practices were analyzed. In-hospital mortality, postoperative stroke, and prolonged length of stay (> 4 days) were the primary outcomes variables. Unadjusted and case-mix adjusted analyses were performed. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 0.61%. CEA was performed annually by high-volume surgeons in 52% of patients, by medium-volume surgeons in 30% of patients, and by low-volume surgeons in 18% of patients. Observed mortality by surgeon volume was 0.44% for high-volume surgeons, 0.63% for medium-volume surgeons, and 1.1% for low-volume surgeons (p < 0.001). The postoperative stroke rate was 1.14% for high-volume surgeons, 1.63% for medium-volume surgeons, and 2.03% for low-volume surgeons (p < 0.001). Surgeon specialty had no statistically significant effect on mortality or postoperative stroke. In the logistic regression model, increased risk of mortality was associated with emergent admission (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6 to 2.8, p < 0.001), patient age > 65 years (OR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.3 to 3.1, p = 0.001), low-volume surgeon (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.5, p < 0.001), and COPD (OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5, p = 0.001). Low hospital CEA volume (< 100) was not a significant risk factor in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of the CEAs in the United States are performed by high-volume surgeons with superior outcomes. Health policy efforts should focus on reducing the number of low-volume surgeons, regardless of surgeon specialty or total hospital CEA volume.     

Increased hospital volume is associated with improved outcomes following abdominal-based breast reconstruction

Abstract

Previous studies of outcomes following abdominal-based breast reconstruction largely use data from single-centre/surgeon experience. Such studies are limited in evaluating the effect of operative volume on outcomes. Abdominal-based breast reconstructive procedures were identified in the 2009–2010 HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Outcomes included in-hospital microvascular complications in free flap cases (requiring exploration/anastomosis revision), procedure-related and total complications in all cases, and length of stay (LOS). High-volume hospitals were defined as 90th percentile of case volume or higher (>30 flaps/year). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of outcomes. Of the 4107 patients identified, mean age was 50.7 years; 71% were white, 68% underwent free flap reconstruction, and 25% underwent bilateral reconstruction. The total complication rate was 13.2%, and the microvascular complication rate was 7.0%. Mean LOS was 4.5 days. There were 436 hospitals; 59% of cases were performed at high-volume institutions. Patients at high-volume hospitals more often underwent free flap reconstruction compared to low-volume hospitals (82.4% vs 50.5%, p < 0.001). On unadjusted analysis, microvascular complication rates of 6.4% vs 8.2% were observed for high-volume compared to low-volume hospitals (p = 0.080). After adjusting for case-mix, high-volume hospitals were associated with a decreased likelihood of suffering a microvascular complication (OR = 0.71, p = 0.026), procedure-related complication (OR = 0.79, p = 0.033), or total complication (OR = 0.75, p = 0.004). The majority of cases nationwide are performed at a small number of high-volume hospitals. These hospitals appear to discharge patients earlier and have lower microvascular, procedure-related, and total complication rates when controlling for case-mix.     

Total laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: beyond selected patients

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has emerged as the procedure of choice for selected patients. This study is to evaluate the feasibility of LDP and procedural outcomes in a series of consecutive nonselected patients. All patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy over 18 months were identified from a prospectively maintained database, under institutional review board approval. A completely laparoscopic (non hand-assisted) procedure was performed using a 4-trocar technique. Conversion to an open procedure, operative time (OR), estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion requirements, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and complications were assessed. Sixteen patients were identified; 2/16 patients had undergone distal pancreatectomy as a component of another multiorgan open procedure, and were thus excluded. The remaining 14 patients had consented for LDP. Conversion occurred in 4/14 cases. Converted patients trended towards increased OR, EBL, and LOS (P = not significant). No mortalities occurred, and overall morbidities included: pancreatic fistula (n = 2), splenic abscess (n = 1), and pneumonia (n = 1). LDP-splenectomy (n = 3/14) was associated with both increased EBL (683 mL ± 388 vs 168 ± 141, P < 0.002) and increased transfusion rate (3/3 vs 3/11, P = 0.05), as compared with LDP-splenic preservation. LDP with splenic artery preservation (LDP-SAP) was completed in 7 of 14 patients, with less OR (2 hours 29 minutes ± 53 minutes vs 3 hours 40 minutes ± 1 hour, P < 0.05), a decreased transfusion rate (14% vs 71%, P = 0.05), and decreased LOS (2.8 days vs 6.8 days, P = 0.002) compared with LDP without SAP. Pathology was intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) (n = 5), ductal carcinoma (n = 3), high grade dysphasia (n = 2), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 2), and pancreatitis (n = 2). Patients undergoing LDP-SAP demonstrated superior peri-procedural outcomes. This series of nonselected consecutive patients supports that LDP is technically feasible with a comparable procedural outcome to the selected-patient literature, suggesting potentially expanded indications for LDP.     

A surgeon's case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer strongly influences the operative mortality rate.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if individual case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer influences the risk of mortality and long-term survival. METHODS: Between January 1994 and December 2005, 195 resections for oesophageal cancer were performed by nine surgeons in a single institution. Operative mortality, defined as in hospital death, was compared between the high-volume and low-volume surgeons. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for death between the two groups, also in the presence of covariates. RESULTS: There were 140 males and 55 females with mean age of 63.4 (32-84). Two high-volume surgeons performed 61% (118) of the operations with a mean of 11 per year compared to 4 per year in the low-volume group. The patients in the two groups were matched for age (63 years vs 64; p=0.53), sex (67 vs 79% male; p=0.07). Ivor Lewis resections were performed more frequently by high-volume surgeons (95 vs 73%; p<0.001). The operative mortality rate was much lower when high case volume surgeons performed the procedure (4 vs 17%; p=0.001). The relative risk of death when low-volume surgeons performed the procedure was 4.59 (95% CI 1.57-13.46; p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was significantly associated with low-volume surgeon when controlling separately for age (OR 4.60; 95% CI 1.55, 13.60, p=0.006), tumor stage (OR 3.76; 95% CI 1.24, 11.45, p=0.02) and tumor type (OR 3.87; 95% CI 1.29, 11.60, p=0.016). Kaplan-Meier curves comparing the survival of high- and low-volume surgeons showed no statistical differences (Log rank p=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Operative mortality rate for oesophagectomy for cancer is strongly influenced by case volume and was 4.6-fold higher when performed by surgeons with low case volume. Patients with oesophageal cancer in need of an oesophagectomy may benefit from referral to a high-volume thoracic surgeon.     

A pancreatic ductal leak should be sought to direct treatment in patients with acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The end result of leakage of pancreatic juice into the peripancreatic space can be sterile necrosis, infected necrosis, or rupture into an adjacent hollow viscus or blood vessel (eg, colon, small bowel, or pseudoaneurysm). If a pancreatic duct (PD) leak is present, should treatment be aimed at minimizing the sequela of the leakage of pancreatic juice and not just supportive observation until a necrosectomy is required? METHODS: In 144 patients with severe pancreatitis we investigated whether the presence of a PD leak was associated with necrosis and also asked if PD leak might predict other outcomes such as a length of stay (LOS), mortality, and need for surgery. Furthermore, we questioned whether the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to search for a PD leak might worsen the clinical outcome because of the potential for introducing microorganisms into an undrained space or exacerbating pancreatitis. RESULTS: The presence of a demonstrable pancreatic duct leak was observed in 37% of patients and was significantly associated with both a higher incidence of necrosis and prolonged LOS (> or = 20 days). These patients were 3.4 times more likely to have necrosis and 2.6 times more likely to have a prolonged LOS. When treated with a combination of percutaneous drains, pancreatic duct stents, and surgery as necessary, a PD leak (even with its higher necrosis rate) was not significantly correlated with either mortality or the need for necrosectomy. The use of ERCP was not associated with LOS, mortality, or the need for necrosectomy, provided discovered PD leaks were immediately drained. CONCLUSIONS: A PD leak is common in patients with pancreatic necrosis but it is also important to locate and decompress in order to impede progression of the disease and keep mortality low.     

Effect of Hospital Volume of Thyroidectomies on Outcomes Following Substernal Thyroidectomy

Background Substernal thyroidectomy (ST), as compared to conventional, cervical thyroidectomy, is a technically demanding procedure that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We tested the hypothesis that outcomes following ST are improved at centers that perform a high volume of thyroidectomies. Methods Patients who underwent ST from 1998 to 2004 were extracted from the New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Hospital volume of thyroidectomies was divided into low (<33 per year), middle (33–99 per year), and high (≥100 per year) volumes. Outcome variables included hospital length of stay (LOS), recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury, hypoparathyroidism, postoperative bleeding, respiratory failure, blood transfusion, and mortality. Results A total of 1153 STs were analyzed; 372 (32.2%) were performed at low-volume centers, 388 (33.7%) at middle-volume centers, and 393 (34.0%) at high-volume centers. Linear associations were observed between increasing hospital volume of thyroidectomies and decreasing age (p = 0.003), increasing co-morbidity (p < 0.0001), increased likelihood of total versus subtotal thyroidectomy (p < 0.0001), and increased likelihood of thyroid malignancy (p < 0.0001). Despite this, increasing hospital volume of thyroidectomies predicted a decreased likelihood of overall complications (p = 0.005), postoperative bleeding (p = 0.01), blood transfusion (p = 0.04), respiratory failure (p = 0.04) and mortality (p = 0.004), as well as a trend toward a decreased LOS (p = 0.06). The overall complication rate and the mortality rate remained significantly associated with volume group by multivariate analysis. Conclusion Despite more extensive surgery on patients with greater co-morbidity, LOS, morbidity, and mortality were all decreased when ST occurred at hospitals that perform a high volume of thyroidectomies.     

Hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery volume and patient mortality, 1998-2000

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between annual hospital coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery volume and in-hospital mortality. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The Leapfrog Group recommends health care purchasers contract for CABG services only with hospitals that perform >or=500 CABGs annually to reduce mortality; it is unclear whether this standard applies to current practice. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database for patients who underwent CABG in 1998-2000 (n = 228738) at low (12-249 cases/year), medium (250-499 cases/year), and high (>or=500 cases/year) CABG volume hospitals. Crude in-hospital mortality rates were 4.21% in low-volume hospitals, 3.74% in medium-volume hospitals, and 3.54% in high-volume hospitals (trend P < 0.001). Compared with patients at high-volume hospitals (odds ratio 1.00, referent), patients at low-volume hospitals remained at increased risk of mortality after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval = 1.15-1.39). The mortality risk for patients at medium-volume hospitals was of borderline significance (odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.21). However, 207 of 243 (85%) of low-volume and 151 of 169 (89%) of medium-volume hospital-years had risk-standardized mortality rates that were statistically lower or comparable to those expected. In contrast, only 11 of 169 (6%) of high-volume hospital-years had outcomes that were statistically better than expected. CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high-volume CABG hospitals were, on average, at a lower mortality risk than patients at lower-volume hospitals. However, the small size of the volume-associated mortality difference and the heterogeneity in outcomes within all CABG volume groups suggest individual hospital CABG volume is not a reliable marker of hospital CABG quality.     

Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Outcome analysis is increasingly being used to develop health-care policy and direct patient referral. For example, the Leapfrog Group health-care quality initiative has proposed "evidence-based hospital" referral criteria for specific procedures including elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA-R). These criteria include an annual hospital AAA operative volume exceeding 50 cases and provision of intensive care unit (ICU) care by board-certified intensivists. Outcomes after AAA-R are reportedly influenced by presentation (intact vs. ruptured), operative approach (endovascular vs. open, transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal), surgeon subspecialty, case volume (hospital and surgeon), and provision of postoperative care by an intensivist. The purpose of this study was to compare our single-center results with those of high-volume centers to assess the validity of the concept that surrogate markers, such as case volume or intensivist involvement, can be used to estimate procedural outcome. A retrospective review was performed of AAA-Rs at one low-volume academic medical center from January 1994 to March 2005. Demographic data, aneurysm diameter and location, operative indications, and repair approach were documented. Postoperative complications, mortality rates, and hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS) were noted and compared to established benchmarks. During the study period, 270 patients underwent AAA-R (annual mean = 27 hospital cases and 13.4 cases/attending vascular surgeon). ICU care was provided by a dedicated vascular surgery service without routine intensivist involvement. Open, elective, infrarenal AAA-R was performed in 161 patients (60%), with a 2.5% hospital mortality rate (30-day, 3.1%). Thirty-three (12%) patients underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), with no mortality. Both ICU (3.7 vs. 1.4 days, p = 0.03) and hospital (9.2 vs. 2.8 days, p = 0.002) LOS were significantly reduced after EVAR compared to open repair. Hospital LOS was significantly lower after open retroperitoneal repair compared to transperitoneal repair (6.1 vs. 10.3 days, p = 0.001). Thirty-five patients (13%) underwent ruptured AAA-R, with only 34.3% mortality (in-hospital and 30-day). Forty-one patients (15%) underwent repair of complex aortic aneurysms, with 14.1% mortality. There are increasing societal and economic pressures to direct patient referrals to "centers of excellence" for specific surgical procedures. Although our institution meets neither of the Leapfrog Group's proposed criteria, our mortality and LOS for both intact and ruptured infrarenal AAA-R are equivalent or superior to published benchmarks for high-volume hospitals. Individual institutional outcome results such as these suggest that patient referral and care should be based upon actual, carefully verified outcome data rather than utilization of surrogate markers such as case volume and subspecialist involvement in postoperative care.     

Sodium Abnormalities Are an Independent Predictor of Complications in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Cautionary Tale!

BackgroundElectrolyte levels are commonly obtained as part of the preoperative workup for total joint arthroplasty, but limited information exists on the interplay between electrolyte abnormalities and outcomes.MethodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried for primary, elective total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) performed between 2011 and 2017. Three patient groups were compared: normal (control), hypernatremia, and hyponatremia. The primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and 30-day adverse events: complications, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality.ResultsA total of 244,538 TKAs and 145,134 THAs were analyzed. The prevalence of hyponatremia and hypernatremia was 6.9% and 1.0%, respectively. After controlling for any baseline differences, hypernatremia was an independent predictor of ventilation >48 hours (THA, odds ratio [OR] 3.53), unplanned intubation (THA, OR 3.14), cardiac arrest (THA, OR 2.42), pneumonia (THA, OR 2.16), Clostridium difficile infection (OR 4.66 and 3.25 for THA and TKA, respectively), LOS >2 days (THA, OR 1.16), and mortality (THA, OR 4.69). Similarly, hyponatremia was an independent predictor of LOS >2 days (TKA, OR 1.21), readmission (TKA, OR 1.40), reoperation (OR 1.32 and 1.47 for THA and TKA, respectively), surgical site infections (OR 1.39 and 1.54 for THA and TKA, respectively), and transfusion (OR 1.13 and 1.20 for THA and TKA, respectively).ConclusionAs the focus of total joint arthroplasty continues to shift toward value-based payment models and outpatient surgery, caution should be exercised in patients with abnormal preoperative sodium levels, particularly hypernatremia, because of significantly increased risk of prolonged LOS and 30-day adverse events.     

The impact of provider volume on mortality after intracranial tumor resection

OBJECTIVE: Policies of regionalization and selective referral for a number of "high-risk" surgical procedures are being explored and implemented as a result of significant variation in postoperative mortality between high- and low-volume providers. The effect of provider volume on outcomes after intracranial tumor resection is unknown and warrants investigation. METHODS: By use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 1996 and 1997, patients (older than 19 yr) who had a diagnosis of a malignant central nervous system neoplasm and underwent craniotomy or craniectomy were included. Hospital volume and surgeon volume were categorized by quartiles (very low, low, high, or very high volume). Unadjusted and case mix-adjusted analyses were performed with regard to postoperative in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The crude in-hospital mortality was 2.8% for a total of 7547 patients. The mean patient age was 55.8 years (66.5% <65; 33.5% >/=65). Mortality for very low- to very high-volume hospitals was as follows: 3.8, 3.2, 2.4, and 1.8% (P < 0.001). Mortality for very low- to very high-volume surgeons was as follows: 4.1, 3.9, 3.1, and 1.4% (P = 0.003). Predictors of mortality in a logistic regression model were emergent admission (odds ratio [OR], 2.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-4.38; P < 0.001), and age 65 years or greater (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.16-2.30; P = 0.005). The risk of mortality was reduced for very high-volume hospitals (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.97; P = 0.038) and very high-volume surgeons (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.84; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Higher-volume providers have superior outcomes after surgical resection of malignant intracranial tumors. This reduction was maintained despite adjustment for case mix. As the regionalization of high-risk surgery moves forward, it is important for neurosurgeons to maintain leadership roles in the development of specialty-specific data collection and health policy initiatives that improve and reduce variation in outcomes.     

The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of hospital volume of bariatric surgery on morbidity, mortality, and costs at academic centers. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The American Society for Bariatric Surgery recently proposed categorization of certain bariatric surgery centers as "Centers of Excellence." Some of the proposed inclusion criteria were hospital volume and operative outcomes. The volume-outcome relationship has been well established in several complex abdominal operations; however, few studies have examined this relationship in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODS: Using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, diagnosis and procedure codes, we obtained data from the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Data Base for all patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity between 1999 and 2002 (n = 24,166). Outcomes of bariatric surgery, including length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, morbidity, observed and expected (risk-adjusted) mortality, and costs were compared between high-volume (>100 cases/year), medium-volume (50-100 cases/year), and low-volume hospitals (<50 cases/year). RESULTS: There were 22 high-volume (n = 13,810), 27 medium-volume (n = 7634), and 44 low-volume (n = 2722) hospitals included in our study. Compared with low-volume hospitals, patients who underwent gastric bypass at high-volume hospitals had a shorter length of hospital stay (3.8 versus 5.1 days, P < 0.01), lower overall complications (10.2% versus 14.5%, P < 0.01), lower complications of medical care (7.8% versus 10.8%, P < 0.01), and lower costs ($10,292 versus $13,908, P < 0.01). The expected mortality rate was similar between high- and low-volume hospitals (0.6% versus 0.6%), demonstrating similarities in characteristics and severity of illness between groups. The observed mortality, however, was significantly lower at high-volume hospitals (0.3% versus 1.2%, P < 0.01). In a subset of patients older than 55 years, the observed mortality was 0.9% at high-volume centers compared with 3.1% at low-volume centers (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery performed at hospitals with more than 100 cases annually is associated with a shorter length of stay, lower morbidity and mortality, and decreased costs. This volume-outcome relationship is even more pronounced for a subset of patients older than 55 years, for whom in-hospital mortality was 3-fold higher at low-volume compared with high-volume hospitals. High-volume hospitals also have a lower rate of overall postoperative and medical care complications, which may be related in part to formalization of the structures and processes of care.     

Total robotic surgical volume influences outcomes of low-volume robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy over an extended duration

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to examine the surgeon’s experience of low-volume robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) over an extended duration, and whether a high-volume fellowship training influenced the outcomes.MethodsData on all RAPN at a tertiary center performed by a uro-oncologist were retrospectively collected. The surgeon experience was assessed by examining perioperative outcomes among three groups of consecutive patients (first=14, second=14, third=15 patients, respectively).ResultsBetween February 2014 and February 2020, 45 RAPNs were performed out of a total of 200 robotic procedures. The median tumor size was 3 cm, and 28 (65%) patients had a R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score (RNS) ≥7. The median operative time and warm ischemia time (WIT) were 190 and 16 minutes, respectively. The median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 100 mL. Two (4%) patients had a positive surgical margin (PSM). Overall, five (12%) complications were recorded. All except one were minor (Clavien I–II). The median followup was 26.2 months. Trifecta and pentafecta were achieved in 40 (93%) and 27 (81.8%) patients, respectively. Increased surgeon experience was significantly associated with a shorter operative time and less EBL. Furthermore, there was an independent association between surgeon experience and operative time and EBL, and between RNS and operative time and WIT.ConclusionsWith fellowship training and subsequent adequate total number of robotic procedures during practice, it is possible to perform RAPN with favorable perioperative outcomes in the setting of low-volume of cases over an extended duration.     

High Hospital Volume Is Associated with Better Outcomes for Breast Cancer Surgery: Analysis of 233,247 Patients

Background: The relationship between hospital volume and outcomes needs to be further elucidated for low-risk procedures such as surgical therapy of localized breast cancer. The objective of this investigation was to assess the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes for breast cancer surgery. Methods: A total of 233,247 patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and breast-ablative therapy (BAT) for localized breast cancer were extracted from 13 years (1988–2000) of the Nationwide Inpatient Samples. Hospital volume was classified as low (<30 cases/year), intermediate (≥ 30 to <70cases/year), and high (≥ 70 cases/year). Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the risk-adjusted association between hospital volume and outcomes. Results: In risk-adjusted analyses, patients operated on at low-volume hospitals were 3.04 (p = 0.03) times more likely to die after BCT compared with patients operated on at high-volume hospitals. Similarly, low-volume hospitals had a significantly higher likelihood of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.73, p = 0.01 for BCT; OR = 1.44, p < 0.001 for BAT) compared with high-volume hospitals. Compared with low-volume hospitals, length of hospital stay was significantly shorter and nonroutine patient discharge significantly lower for high-volume providers for both BCT and BAT (all p < 0.001). Patients were also significantly less likely to undergo BCT if operated on in a low- or intermediate-volume hospital compared with a high-volume provider (p < 0.001). Conclusions: High-volume hospitals had significantly lower nonroutine patient discharge, postoperative morbidity and mortality, shorter length of hospital stay, and higher likelihood of performing BCT. Referral of patients with localized breast cancer to high-volume hospitals may be justified.     

Volume-outcome effects for children undergoing resection of renal malignancies

IntroductionAdults undergoing oncologic resections at low-volume centers experience increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. The volume-outcome effect has not been extensively studied in pediatric oncologic resections.MethodsTo clarify volume-outcome effects in pediatric oncologic resections, we analyzed resection of renal malignancies in children less than 15 y of age. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of hospital discharges included in the health care utilization project kids' inpatient database from 1997 to 2009, examining in-hospital operative complications, length of stay (LOS), and inflation-adjusted hospital charges. Hospital volume was expressed as low (n = 1–2), medium (n = 3–4), and high (n > 4) annual volume of resections.ResultsOne thousand five hundred thirty-eight patients underwent renal malignancy resection. Of these, 527 patients had resection in low-, 422 in medium-, and 589 in high-volume hospitals. Relative to low-volume hospitals, those resected in medium-volume hospitals had an odds ratio of 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.39–0.99, P = 0.046) for operative complication and those in high-volume hospitals had an odds ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.63–1.65, P = 0.95). There was no detectable association with LOS (P = 0.113) or inflation-adjusted charges (P = 0.331).ConclusionsThe number of complications, total charges, and LOS attributable to resection of a childhood renal malignancy did not differ among high-, medium-, or low-operative volume hospitals, although oncologic outcomes could not be determined because of the limited nature of this administrative database.     

Haemorrhagic complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhagic complication occurs in 5-16% of patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We report an analysis of patients with post-PD bleed, to identify predictors of bleed, predictors of survival following bleed and the management of post-PD bleed. METHODS: Two hundred and eighteen patients with periampullary cancers underwent PD from 1989 to 2002. Forty-four (20.2%) patients had a bleeding complication. Of these, 25 patients had an intra-abdominal (IA) bleed and 21 had gastrointestinal (GI) bleed (two had both IA and GI bleed). Clinical, biochemical and tumour characteristics were analysed to identify factors influencing bleeding complications. RESULTS: The median time to presentation was 4.5 days (0-21 days). Serum bilirubin (P = 0.000, OR: 1.090) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) leak (P = 0.009, OR: 3.174) were significant independent factors predicting bleeding complications. Forty-three per cent of patients each had early bleed (<48 h after PD) or delayed bleed (7 days after PD). Comparison of early and late bleeds showed that IA bleed (P = 0.02) presented as early bleeds. Male sex (P = 0.00) longer duration of jaundice (P = 0.02), PJ leak (P = 0.001), HJ leak (P = 0.001), duct to mucosa type of PJ anastomosis (P = 0.03) and IA abscess (P = 0.00) were associated with a significantly higher incidence of late bleeds. Overall mortality after PD was 9.6% with 34% and 3% in bleeders and non-bleeders, respectively. Septicaemia (P = 0.01, OR: 5.49), and acute renal failure (P = 0.01) were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding complications following PD were seen in one-fifth of patients and were associated with high mortality. Serum bilirubin levels and PJ leak were significant factors associated with bleeding complications. Septicaemia and acute renal failure were significant factors associated with mortality in the bleeders.     

Factors influencing perioperative blood transfusions in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing major cancer resections often receive blood transfusions (TFs). Preoperative erythropoietin (EPO) offers the rationale to reduce TFs and related morbidity. METHODS: Perioperative TF information was collected prospectively in a single surgeon practice over 5 years. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-four patients underwent a major procedure, including pancreatic (n = 130, 38%), hepatobiliary (n = 87, 25%), gastroesophageal (n = 69, 20%), and other operations (n = 58, 17%). Median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 375 mL. PRBC TFs were given in 83 cases (24%), at a median of 2 units [1-16]. TF frequency and EBL did not differ between diagnoses. Multivariate TF associations existed for Hgb (P < 0.0001, OR 0.335), EBL (P < 0.0001, OR 1.007), serum Cl (P = 0.004, OR 1.25), serum Na (P = 0.02, OR 0.810), and age (P = 0.04, OR 1.033). TFs (versus no TFs) were linked to major complications (43 versus 20%, P = 0.0002), mortality (12% versus 3%, P = 0.001), and increased LOS (9 versus 7 days, P < 0.0001). A potential benefit for preoperative EPO to avoid TFs could be derived for only 31 patients (9%). CONCLUSIONS: In this low TF rate of 24% for major visceral resections, few preoperative parameters are able to identify subgroups at risk for TFs aside from blood counts. Our data would not support generalized preoperative EPO administration.     

Comparison of carotid endarterectomy at high- and low-volume hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Population-based studies have demonstrated better outcomes for carotid endarterectomies at high-volume hospitals. METHODS: This is a 2-year retrospective review of carotid procedures at two low-volume hospitals (n = 156) and one high-volume hospital (n = 404) in the metropolitan area of Portland, Oregon. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality and stroke rates for carotid endarterectomies when comparing low- and high-volume hospitals (P = 0.59). These were comparable rates despite the fact that the low-volume hospitals had significantly older patients (P <0.001), more smokers (P <0.001), more patients with an indication of a previous nondisabling stroke (P <0.01), and fewer patients who were asymptomatic (P <0.01). CONCLUSION: The regionalization of carotid endarterectomy into high-volume hospitals is not justified by the findings of this study. Carotid endarterectomy performed by well-trained, experienced surgeons in low-volume hospitals is a safe procedure.     

Comparing clinical outcomes in high-volume and low-volume off-pump coronary bypass operation programs

sites and then analyzed the patient and hospital characteristics that had an impact on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The mortality rates for the high- and low-volume OPCAB facilities both averaged 2.9% (p = NS). Patients at the high-volume OPCAB facilities had significantly lower rates of major complications (shock/hemorrhage, neurologic, renal, and cardiac) than those at the low-volume OPCAB facilities. Of the seven minor complications, rates for six were lower in the high-volume OPCAB facilities, but none of the differences reached statistical significance. High-volume OPCAB sites were significantly more likely to discharge their patients directly home than were low-volume OPCAB sites (80% versus 66%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that surgical team experience and choice of approaches to performing CABG had an impact on patient outcomes.