Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with AV block (BLOCK HF): clinical study design and rationale

Background: Right ventricular (RV) pacing restores ventricular systole in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block, yet recent studies have suggested that in patients with AV block and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, RV pacing may exacerbate the progression to heart failure (HF). BLOCK HF is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial designed to determine whether patients with AV block, LV dysfunction (EF ≤ 50%), and mild to moderate HF (NYHA I-III) who require pacing benefit from biventricular (BiV) pacing, compared with RV pacing alone.
Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether the time to first event (all-cause mortality, heart failure-related urgent care, or a ≥ 15% increase in left ventricular end systolic volume index [LVESVI]) for patients with BiV pacing is superior to that of patients with RV pacing.
Methods: Patients with AV block and LV dysfunction who require permanent pacing and undergo successful implantation of a commercial Medtronic CRT device, with or without an ICD, will be randomized to BiV or RV pacing. Patients are followed at least every 6 months until study closure. Up to 1,636 patients may be enrolled in 150 centers worldwide.
Conclusion: BLOCK HF is a large, randomized, clinical study in pacing-indicated patients with AV block, mild to moderate HF symptoms, and LV dysfunction to determine whether BiV pacing is superior to RV pacing in slowing the progression of HF.     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with narrow QRS

Conduction delay affecting 30-50% of patients with NYHA class III-IV heart failure (HF) mainly results from left bundle branch block and leads to deterioration of cardiac contractility through intra- and interventricular dyssynchrony. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has class I recommendation for the treatment of patients with severe systolic HF who have left ventricular ejection fraction less or equal to 35%, QRS duration greater than or equal to 120 ms. Nevertheless some studies have shown that systolic asynchrony is present in 27-43% of HF patients with narrow QRS complexes (defined as <120 ms). We present here results of CRT in 20 patients (13 male, 7 female). Main indication for CRT was ventricular dyssynchrony during basic cardiac rhythm or cardiac pacing independently of QRS width. In 4 patients width of QRS complex was less than 120 ms, in 3 QRS varied from 120 to 149 ms pts and in 13 it was equal to or exceeded 150 ms. CRT in patients with narrow QRS resulted in clinical improvement associated with increase of cardiac contractility and decrease of left ventricular end systolic volume. This allows to conclude that CRT can be beneficial for HF patients with narrow QRS and ventricular dyssynchrony.     

Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to predict the response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves HF symptoms, exercise capacity, and left ventricular (LV) function. Because not all patients respond, preimplantation identification of responders is needed. In the present study, response to CRT was predicted by the presence of LV dyssynchrony assessed by tissue Doppler imaging. Moreover, the prognostic value of LV dyssynchrony in patients undergoing CRT was assessed. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with end-stage HF, QRS duration >120 ms, and left bundle-branch block were evaluated by tissue Doppler imaging before CRT. At baseline and six months follow-up, New York Heart Association functional class, quality of life and 6-min walking distance, LV volumes, and LV ejection fraction were determined. Events (death, hospitalization for decompensated HF) were obtained during one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Responders (74%) and nonresponders (26%) had comparable baseline characteristics, except for a larger dyssynchrony in responders (87 +/- 49 ms vs. 35 +/- 20 ms, p < 0.01). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that an optimal cutoff value of 65 ms for LV dyssynchrony yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 80% to predict clinical improvement and of 92% to predict LV reverse remodeling. Patients with dyssynchrony >/=65 ms had an excellent prognosis (6% event rate) after CRT as compared with a 50% event rate in patients with dyssynchrony <65 ms (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LV dyssynchrony >/=65 ms respond to CRT and have an excellent prognosis after CRT.     

Triple-site biventricular pacing in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a feasibility study.

AIMS: To evaluate implantation safety and efficiency of triple-site (double left-single right) cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and to assess the outcome of this procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) < or = 35%, and QRS > or = 120 ms underwent triple-site CRT. Procedural course and complications were analysed. NYHA class, QRS duration, echocardiographic parameters, peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)max), and 6 min walking distance (6MWD) were assessed at baseline and after 3 months. Responders were defined by survival, by no re-hospitalization for heart failure, and by >10% EF, VO(2)max, and 6MWD increase. Implantation was successful in 22 patients (84.6%). Procedure duration (199.1 min) and fluoroscopy time (38.7 min) were higher than in standard procedures. Two clinically silent coronary sinus dissections occurred intra-operatively; one phrenic nerve stimulation and one pocket infection were observed during follow-up. After 3 months of CRT, a significant reduction (P < 0.05) of NYHA class, increment of VO(2)max, 6MWD, EF, and improvement of indices of dyssynchrony were observed. Response rate in the studied group was 95.4%. CONCLUSION: Triple-site resynchronization appears to be a safe and efficient treatment method, with high response rate. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of this pacing mode in CRT.     

Future directions in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces symptoms and improves mortality in patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class III–IV) in sinus rhythm with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and with wide QRS on the surface electrocardiogram as evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony. CRT’s benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation, mild heart failure, or a conventional indication for antibradycardia pacing is being assessed. Moreover, the PROSPECT trial assessed whether the response rate to CRT might increase if, in addition to wide QRS, mechanical dyssynchrony criteria were required. The RethinQ study examined whether patients with narrow QRS but with mechanical dyssynchrony benefit from CRT. Finally, whether patients with heart failure with preserved left ventricular function also may benefit from CRT remains to be studied.     

Echocardiographic aspects of multisite pacing in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography has emerged as an accepted approach to define dyssynchrony in patients with advanced stage of heart failure (HF). Unfortunately no single echocardiographic parameter has been established to predict positive response after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the nonresponder rate of 20-30% is still a matter of discussion and research. One of the most promising techniques in this regard is two-dimensional strain echocardiography based on speckle tracking with the potential to disclose residual dyssynchrony after primary CRT. An important reason for weak response to CRT is suboptimal position of the coronary sinus (CS) lead. Initial clinical benefit after CRT may mask partial residual dyssynchrony, which may cause worsening and recurrence of HF symptoms over time. Echocardiography helps to define the location of residual dyssynchrony and may identify patients who would benefit from implantation of a second CS-lead and triple-site pacing. If primary CRT fails due to imperfect placement of the CS-lead or due to coronary vein abnormalities and an epicardial approach is not appropriate, dual site pacing of the right ventricle may be an alternative procedure.     

Responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy with narrow or intermediate QRS complexes identified by simple echocardiographic indices of dyssynchrony: the DESIRE study

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is recommended for patients with NYHA class III-IV refractory heart failure (HF), ejection fraction <35% and a QRS >120 ms. We attempted to identify responders to CRT from echocardiographic (echo) indices of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with QRS<150 ms. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study enrolled 51 men and 9 women (mean age: 64.5 years) in NYHA class III (n=54) or IV (n=6) presenting with a mean ejection fraction: 25.7%, LV end-diastolic diameter: 69.1 mm, and QRS=121+/-19 ms. All patients were implanted with a CRT system and followed for 1 year. Implantation was preceded and followed by clinical, functional and Doppler (D)-echo evaluation. The primary combined endpoint included 1) death from any cause, 2) HF-related hospitalisations, and 3) NYHA class at 6 months. Before implant, 27 patients had > or =1 echo criterion of mechanical dyssynchrony (DES+ group) and 33 had no evidence of dyssynchrony (DES- group). At 12 months, 8 patients (4 per group) had died, 7 from HF. As regards the primary endpoint at 6 months, 33 patients (55%) had improved, 10 (16%) were unchanged, and 17 (29%) had deteriorated. Clinical improvement was observed in 19 of 27 DES+ (70%), versus 14 of 33 DES- (42%) patients (P<0.04). Baseline QRS duration did not predict response to CRT. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of HF patients with QRS<150 ms, the presence of mechanical dyssynchrony at baseline D-echo examination, but not the QRS width, predicted 6-month clinical response to CRT.     

Biventricular vs. left univentricular pacing in heart failure: rationale, design, and endpoints of the B-LEFT HF study.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) confers sustained therapeutic benefits to patients suffering from congestive heart failure (CHF) due to systolic dysfunction associated with ventricular dyssynchrony. Biventricular (BiV) pacing has, thus far, been the preferred method, as it corrects both electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony. Left ventricular (LV) only pacing, which has conferred similar benefits in pilot studies, may be an alternative treatment method. 'Biventricular vs. left univentricular pacing with ICD back-up in heart failure patients' (B-LEFT HF) is an international, prospective, randomized, parallel-design, double-blind, clinical trial to examine whether LV only pacing is as safe and effective as BiV pacing in patients suffering from CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The trial will randomly assign 172 patients to either LV only or BiV pacing. The study has prospectively defined efficacy endpoints to be evaluated at 6 months, which are (i) changes in functional capacity and degree of reverse remodelling (primary) and (ii) changes in the heart failure clinical composite response (secondary). CONCLUSION: Because LV only pacing in CRT is likely to be technically less challenging and costly than BiV, a specifically designed study is needed to compare the safety and effectiveness of the two configurations. B-LEFT HF has been designed to settle this critical issue.     

Indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy: 2011 update from the Heart Failure Society of America Guideline Committee

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves survival, symptoms, quality of life, exercise capacity, and cardiac structure and function in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or ambulatory class IV heart failure (HF) with wide QRS complex. The totality of evidence supports the use of CRT in patients with less severe HF symptoms. CRT is recommended for patients in sinus rhythm with a widened QRS interval (≥150 ms) not due to right bundle branch block (RBBB) who have severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and persistent NYHA functional class II-III symptoms despite optimal medical therapy (strength of evidence A). CRT may be considered for several other patient groups for whom evidence of benefit is clinically significant but less substantial, including patients with a QRS interval of ≥120 to <150 ms and severe LV systolic dysfunction who have persistent mild to severe HF despite optimal medical therapy (strength of evidence B), some patients with atrial fibrillation, and some with ambulatory class IV HF. Several evidence gaps remain that need to be addressed, including the ideal threshold for QRS duration, QRS morphology, lead placement, degree of myocardial scarring, and the modality for evaluating dyssynchrony. Recommendations will evolve over time as additional data emerge from completed and ongoing clinical trials.     

Avoidance of right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy improves right ventricular hemodynamics in heart failure patients

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) applied by pacing the left and right ventricles (BiV) has been shown to provide synchronous left ventricular (LV) contraction in heart failure patients. CRT may also be accomplished through synchronization of a properly timed LV pacing impulse with intrinsically conducted activation wave fronts. Elimination of right ventricular (RV) pacing may provide a more physiological RV contraction pattern and reduce device current drain. We evaluated the effects of LV and BiV pacing over a range of atrioventricular intervals on the performance of both ventricles.
Methods: Acute LV and RV hemodynamic data from 17 patients with heart failure (EF = 30 ± 1%) and a wide QRS (138 ± 25 msec) or mechanical dyssynchrony were acquired during intrinsic rhythm, BiV, and LV pacing.
Results: The highest LV dP/dt_max was achieved during LV pre- (LV paced prior to an RV sense) and BiV pacing, followed by that obtained during LV post-pacing (LV paced after an RV sense) and the lowest LV dP/dt_max was recorded during intrinsic rhythm. Compared with BiV pacing, LV pre-pacing significantly improved RV dP/dt_max (378 ± 136 mmHg/second vs 397 ± 136 mmHg/second, P < 0.05) and preserved RV cycle efficiency (61.6 ± 14.6% vs 68.6 ± 11.4%, P < 0.05) and stroke volume (6.6 ± 4.4 mL vs 9.0 ± 6.3 mL, P < 0.05). Based on LV dP/dt_max, the optimal atrioventricular interval could be estimated by subtracting 30 msec from the intrinsic atrial to sensed RV interval.
Conclusions: Synchronized LV pacing produces acute LV and systemic hemodynamic benefits similar to BiV pacing. LV pacing at an appropriate atrioventricular interval prior to the RV sensed impulse provides superior RV hemodynamics compared with BiV pacing.     

Concordance Between Mechanical and Electrical Dyssynchrony in Heart Failure Patients: A Function of the Underlying Cardiomyopathy?

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves heart failure (HF) symptoms through a reduction of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony. Mechanical dyssynchrony is currently estimated by electrical dyssynchrony (QRS duration). It is known that electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony are not well correlated in HF patients. However, there is limited information about whether this relationship might be influenced by the underlying cardiomyopathy.
Methods: Doppler echocardiography was performed in 88 patients presenting with heart failure due to ischemic (n = 42) or nonischemic (n = 46) heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, New York Heart Association class II–IV, regardless of their QRS duration. Interventricular dyssynchrony was assessed by the time interval between preaortic and prepulmonary ejection times. Intraventricular dyssynchrony was ascertained by (1) the delay between the earliest and the latest peak negative longitudinal strain recorded in the basal and mid-segments of the lateral and septal walls (TMinMax) and (2) the standard deviation of time-to-peak in the same segments (SDdys).
Results: The correlation coefficient between QRS duration and mechanical interventricular dyssynchrony was r = 0.47 (P < 0.001) in patients with nonischemic disease and nonsignificant in patients with ischemic disease. Similarly, the correlation coefficient between QRS duration and mechanical intraventricular dyssynchrony was significant in patients with nonischemic disease (r = 0.37, P = 0.01 for TMinMax; r = 0.42, P = 0.003 for SDdys) and nonsignificant in patients with ischemic disease.
Conclusion: The concordance between electrical dyssynchrony assessed by QRS duration and mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by myocardial strain is dependent upon the underlying cardiomyopathy. This observation may improve our understanding of the various responses observed in CRT patients.     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS complex.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with narrow QRS complex (<120 ms) and evidence of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony on tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is beneficial in selected heart failure patients with wide QRS complex (> or =120 ms). Patients with narrow QRS complex are currently not eligible for CRT, and the potential effects of CRT are not well studied. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with narrow QRS complex and 33 consecutive patients with wide QRS complex (control group) were prospectively included. All patients needed to have LV dyssynchrony > or =65 ms on TDI, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV heart failure, and LV ejection fraction < or =35%. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, particularly LV dyssynchrony, were comparable between patients with narrow and wide QRS complex (110 +/- 8 ms vs. 175 +/- 22 ms; p = NS). No significant relationship was observed between baseline QRS duration and LV dyssynchrony (r = 0.21; p = NS). The improvement in clinical symptoms and LV reverse remodeling was comparable between patients with narrow and wide QRS complex (mean NYHA functional class reduction 0.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.6 [p = NS] and mean LV end-systolic volume reduction 39 +/- 34 ml vs. 44 +/- 46 ml [p = NS]). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy appears to be beneficial in patients with narrow QRS complex and severe LV dyssynchrony on TDI, with similar improvement in symptoms and comparable LV reverse remodeling to patients with wide QRS complex. The current results need confirmation in larger patient cohorts.     

Totally epicardial cardiac resynchronization therapy system implantation in patients with heart failure undergoing CABG

BACKGROUND: Systolic dyssynchrony is present in a considerable number of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Surgical revascularization offers an optimal setting for totally epicardial cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) system implantation. AIM: To assess the efficacy of totally epicardial CRT implantation during CABG, in patients with HF. METHODS: Twenty three patients with HF and dyssynchrony underwent totally epicardial CRT system implantation during CABG. This randomised, single-blind, cross-over study compared clinical and echocardiographic parameters during two periods: 3 months of active CRT (CRT+) and 3 months of inactive CRT (CRT-) pacing. RESULTS: Twenty two patients underwent randomisation and completed both study periods. In the CRT+ group more patients improved by two NYHA classes (p=0.028), had a longer 6-minute walk test distance (p=0.047) and better quality of life (p=0.003) compared with the CRT- group. Echocardiography revealed an improved LV ejection fraction (p<0.001), smaller LV end-systolic volume (p=0.04), reduced mitral regurgitation (p=0.026) and improved LV synchrony in the CRT+ group compared with the CRT- group. CONCLUSION: CRT delivered by a totally epicardial system implanted during CABG is associated with additional improvement of clinical and echocardiographic parameters in patients with HF and systolic dyssynchrony.     

Usefulness and Limitation of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography to Predict Acute Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background: It has been hypothesized that a long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) could correlate with myocardial viability in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Contractile reserve and viability in the region of the pacing lead have not been investigated in regard to acute response after CRT. Methods: Fifty-one consecutive patients with advanced heart failure, LV ejection fraction ≤ 35%, QRS duration > 120 ms, and intraventricular asynchronism ≥ 50 ms were prospectively included. The week before CRT implantation, the presence of viability was evaluated using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Acute responders were defined as a ≥15% increase in LV stroke volume. Results: The average of viable segments was 5.8 ± 1.9 in responders and 3.9 ± 3 in nonresponders (P = 0.03). Viability in the region of the pacing lead had an excellent sensitivity (96%), but a low specificity (56%) to predict acute response to CRT. Mitral regurgitation (MR) was reduced in 21 patients (84%) with acute response. The presence of MR was a poor predictor of response (sensibility 93% and specificity 17%). However, combining the presence of MR and viability in the region of the pacing lead yields a sensibility (89%) and a specificity (70%) to predict acute response to CRT. Conclusion: Myocardial viability is an important factor influencing acute hemodynamic response to CRT. In acute responders, significant MR reduction is frequent. The combined presence of MR and viability in the region of the pacing lead predicts acute response to CRT with the best accuracy. (Echocardiography 2010;27:50-57)     

Indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Consensus 2005

The indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing or ICD systems has to be highly differentiated to optimize the proportion of patients who derive significant symptomatic benefit from this therapy, on the one hand, and to avoid this invasive treatment in patients with a low probability of clinical success of CRT, on the other hand. As a consensus in 2005, it can be put forward that there is sufficient evidence for an indication for CRT from clinical studies for the following characteristics: 1) Heart failure in NYHA functional class III or IV (if cardiac recompensation to class III is at least temporarily successful), 2) left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%, 3) QRS duration >130 ms, particularly if left bundle branch block is present, 4) sinus rhythm. In addition, available data also suggest an indication for CRT in patients with atrial fibrillation if the other criteria listed above are met. The indication for CRT is unclear in patients with other intraventricular conduction delay (particularly right bundle branch block) while patients with left bundle branch block and a QRS duration of 120-130 ms seem to benefit if echocardiographic criteria demonstrate ventricular dyssynchrony. Since a multiplicity of echocardiographic criteria of ventricular dyssynchrony exists which is neither standardized nor evaluated in large-scale randomized trials, ventricular dyssynchrony on echocardiography alone cannot be regarded as an established indication for CRT without a QRS complex > or =120 ms. Similarly, whether heart failure in functional state NYHA II should be regarded as a CRT indication is currently being investigated in the randomized RAFT and MADIT-CRT trials.     

Mechanical left ventricular dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with narrow QRS duration as assessed by three-dimensional speckle area tracking strain

The aim of this study was to assess whether heart failure (HF) patients with narrow QRS durations have mechanical left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony compared to those with wide QRS durations and with normal subjects. The strain dyssynchrony index with 3-dimensional area tracking (ASDI) was used, which represents mechanical LV dyssynchrony and residual endomyocardial function from circumferential as well as longitudinal directions. The study included 79 subjects: 32 HF patients with ejection fractions ≤ 35% and narrow QRS durations (<120 ms) and 22 with ejection fractions ≤ 35% and wide QRS durations (≥ 120 ms), all candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy, and 25 normal controls. ASDI was calculated as the average difference between peak and end-systolic area strain of LV endocardium obtained using 3-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging using 16 LV segments (≥ 3.8% predefined as significant). ASDI in HF patients with narrow QRS durations was lower than in their counterparts with wide QRS durations (2.5 ± 1.3% vs 4.2 ± 1.2%, p <0.001) but higher than in normal controls (2.5 ± 1.3% vs 0.73 ± 0.53%, p <0.001). Furthermore, the prevalence of significant ASDI in HF patients with narrow QRS durations was significantly higher than in normal controls (22% vs 0%, p = 0.01) but significantly lower than in HF patients with wide QRS durations (22% vs 59%, p <0.01). In conclusion, HF patients with narrow QRS durations have LV dyssynchrony. These observations suggest that the use of 3-dimensional speckle area tracking strain might be extended to HF patients with narrow QRS durations who are being considered as potential candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy.     

Predictive parameters of left ventricular reverse remodeling in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with severe congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is useful for the treatment of severe congestive heart failure. Unfortunately up to 30% of patients could be non-responders. The aim of our study was to find parameters to predict responsiveness to CRT. METHODS: Fifteen patients (9 males, 6 females, mean age 67.3 +/- 7.8 years, range 52-83 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy, NYHA functional class III-IV, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < 35% and QRS > or = 110 ms, underwent CRT. All the patients had echocardiographic evidence of systolic dys-synchrony. RESULTS: One patient died of electromechanical dissociation. The remaining 14 patients maintained biventricular stimulation at 6 months; mean QRS width decreased from 156 to 132 ms (p < 0.001). Ten patients (71%) were considered responders because of a reduction in LV end-systolic volume > 15%. In non-responders (4 patients, 29%) LV end-systolic volume was stable in 3 patients and increased in 1. LV ejection fraction significantly increased only in responders (p < 0.001). Responders had more severe pre-pacing dyssynchrony than non-responders (p < 0.001). Inter- (p = 0.002) and intraventricular dyssynchrony (p = 0.003) did significantly reduce after CRT only in responders. On multiple regression analysis there were two independent predictors of reverse remodeling after pacing: the baseline mitral QS-tricuspid QS (QSm-QSt) time (B = -1.7, p = 0.005) and the intraventricular dyssynchrony index (B = -1.55, p = 0.007). Pre-implant QSm-QSt of 38 ms correctly identified the two groups: responders had a value > 38 ms and non-responders < 38 ms. The pre-implant intraventricular dyssynchrony index of 28 ms was the cut-off value: responders had an index > 28 ms, non-responders < 28 ms. CONCLUSIONS: In the literature a tissue Doppler imaging index of intraventricular dyssynchrony evaluated before implantation is used to select responders to CRT. In our work we studied interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony, and both the QSm-QSt time and the standard deviation of the 12 LV segment QS time were correctly able to identify responders.     

Contractile Reserve Assessed Using Dobutamine Echocardiography Predicts Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Prospective Validation in Patients with Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony

Background: The presence of viable myocardium may predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study is to evaluate in patients with left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony whether response to CRT is related to myocardial viability in the region of the pacing lead. Methods: Forty‐nine consecutive patients with advanced heart failure, LV ejection fraction < 35%, QRS duration > 120 ms and intraventricular asynchronism ≥ 50 ms were included. Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed within the week before CRT implantation. Resting echocardiography was performed 6 months after CRT implantation. Viability in the region of LV pacing lead was defined as the presence of viability in two contiguous segments. Response to CRT was defined by evidence of reverse LV remodeling (≥15% reduction in LV end‐systolic volume). Results: Thirty‐one patients (63%) were identified as responders at follow‐up. The average of viable segments was 5.9 ± 2 in responders and 3.2 ± 3 in nonresponders (P = 0.0003). Viability in the region of the pacing lead had a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 67%, a positive predictive value of 83%, and a negative predictive value of 86% for the prediction of response to CRT. Conclusions: In patients with LV dyssynchrony, reverse remodeling after CRT requires viability in the region of the pacing lead. This simple method using echocardiography dobutamine for the evaluation of local viability (i.e., viability in two contiguous segments) may be useful to the clinician in choosing the best LV lead positioning. (Echocardiography 2010;27:668‐676)     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a novel adjunct to the treatment and prevention of systemic right ventricular failure

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and hemodynamic benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with systemic right ventricle (RV). BACKGROUND: Patients with a systemic RV are at high risk of developing heart failure. Cardiac resynchronization therapy may improve RV function in those with electromechanical dyssynchrony. METHODS: Eight patients (age 6.9 to 29.2 years) with a systemic RV and right bundle-branch block (n = 2) or pacing from the left ventricle (LV) (n = 6) with a QRS interval of 161 +/- 21 ms underwent CRT (associated with cardiac surgery aimed at decrease in tricuspid regurgitation in 3 of 8 patients) and were followed-up for a median of 17.4 months. RESULTS: Change from baseline rhythm to CRT was accompanied by a decrease in QRS interval (-28.0%, p = 0.002) and interventricular mechanical delay (-16.7%, p = 0.047) and immediate improvement in the RV filling time (+10.9%, p = 0.002), Tei index (-7.7%, p = 0.008), estimated RV maximum +dP/dt(+45.9%, p = 0.007), aortic velocity-time integral (+7.0%, p = 0.028), and RV ejection fraction by radionuclide ventriculography (+9.6%, p = 0.04). The RV fractional area of change increased from a median of 18.1% before resynchronization to 29.5% at last follow-up (p = 0.008) without a significant change in the end-diastolic area (+4.0%, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The CRT yielded improvement in systemic RV function in patients with spontaneous or LV pacing-induced electromechanical dyssynchrony and seems to be a promising adjunct to the treatment and prevention of systemic RV failure.     

心脏再同步化治疗慢性心力衰竭的疗效评价及无效原因分析

目的 评价心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)对慢性心力衰竭患者的临床和超声心动图疗效,总结CRT无效的原因.方法 研究施行CRT的患者53例,男37例,女16例,年龄41～82岁.患者术前均采用血流多普勒和组织多普勒的方法进行收缩不同步的评价,术前和术后6个月进行美国纽约心脏病学会(NYHA)心功能分级评价、心电图和超声心动图检查.临床有效者定义为术后6个月NYHA心功能分级改善1级以上的患者.超声心动图有效者定义为术后6个月左室收缩末容积缩小＞15%或左室射血分数绝对值增加＞5%的患者.结果 CRT术后6个月时,7例患者死亡,46例患者存活.其中NYHA心功能分级至少改善1级者40例,临床有效率为75.5%;超声心动图有效者37例(69.8%).术后6个月:左心室缩小;左室射血分数由(27.4±6.7)%增加到(40.4±10.0)%,P＜0.01;左心房内径缩小;二尖瓣反流减少;肺动脉收缩压由(49.6±13.6)mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)降低为(38.7±14.5)mm Hg.窦性心律组(42例)的超声有效率显著高于心房颤动组(11例).在窦性心律患者中,与CRT无效组(10例)相比,有效组(32例)起搏前的QRS较宽(P＜0.05),肺动脉收缩压较低(P＜0.05),左室射血前时间较长(P＜0.05);起搏前两组间腔室大小、LVEF、二尖瓣反流面积和组织多普勒的各个收缩不同步参数的差异无统计学意义.结论 CRT能改善心力衰竭患者的左室收缩功能和左室重构,减少二尖瓣反流,降低肺动脉收缩压.窦性心律组的CRT疗效优于心房颤动组.在非缺血性心肌病和左束支传导阻滞患者占多数的研究中,QRS宽度、左室射血前时间和肺动脉收缩压可能预测CRT的疗效.