Increased risk of breast cancer following different regimens of hormone replacement therapy frequently used in Europe

Epidemiologic studies have shown an increased risk of breast cancer following hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The aim of this study was to investigate whether different treatment regimens or the androgenecity of progestins influence the risk of breast cancer differently. The Danish Nurse Cohort was established in 1993, where all female nurses aged 45 years and above received a mailed questionnaire (n = 23,178). A total of 19,898 women returned the questionnaire (86%). The questionnaire included information on HRT types and regimens, reproductive history and lifestyle-related factors. Breast cancer cases were ascertained using nationwide registries. The follow-up ended on 31 December 1999. Women with former cancer diagnoses, women with missing information on HRT, surgical menopause, premenopausal, as well as hysterectomized women were excluded, leaving 10,874 for analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 244 women developed breast cancer during follow-up. After adjustment for confounding factors, an increased risk of breast cancer was found for the current use of estrogen only (RR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.16-3.35), for the combined use of estrogen and progestin (RR = 2.70; 95% CI = 1.96-3.73) and for current users of tibolone (RR = 4.27; 95% CI = 1.74-10.51) compared to the never use of HRT. In current users of combined HRT with testosterone-like progestins, the continuous combined regimens were associated with a statistically significant higher risk of breast cancer than the cyclical combined regimens (RR = 4.16, 95% CI = 2.56-6.75, and RR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.26-3.00, respectively). An increased risk of breast cancer was noted with longer durations of use for the continuous combined regimens (p for trend = 0.048). The European traditional HRT regimens were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The highest risk was found for the use of continuous combined estrogen and progestin.     

Breast cancer risk in relation to different types of hormone replacement therapy in the E3N-EPIC cohort

Most epidemiological studies have shown an increase in breast cancer risk related to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use. A recent large cohort study showed effects of similar magnitude for different types of progestogens and for different routes of administration of estrogens evaluated. Further investigation of these issues is of importance. We assessed the risk of breast cancer associated with HRT use in 54,548 postmenopausal women who had never taken any HRT 1 year before entering the E3N-EPIC cohort study (mean age at inclusion: 52.8 years); 948 primary invasive breast cancers were diagnosed during follow-up (mean duration: 5.8 years). Data were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. In this cohort where the mean duration of HRT use was 2.8 years, an increased risk in HRT users compared to nonusers was found (relative risk (RR) 1.2 [95% confidence interval 1.1-1.4]). The RR was 1.1 [0.8-1.6] for estrogens used alone and 1.3 [1.1-1.5] when used in combination with oral progestogens. The risk was significantly greater (p <0.001) with HRT containing synthetic progestins than with HRT containing micronized progesterone, the RRs being 1.4 [1.2-1.7] and 0.9 [0.7-1.2], respectively. When combined with synthetic progestins, both oral and transdermal/percutaneous estrogens use were associated with a significantly increased risk; for transdermal/percutaneous estrogens, this was the case even when exposure was less than 2 years. Our results suggest that, when combined with synthetic progestins, even short-term use of estrogens may increase breast cancer risk. Micronized progesterone may be preferred to synthetic progestins in short-term HRT. This finding needs further investigation.     

激素替代治疗与女性肺癌关系的研究现况分析

肺癌是全球最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,在肿瘤致死原因中居第一位。女性激素替代治疗应用于卵巢功能衰退者以预防疾病、缓解症状。通过了解激素替代治疗应用现况及其与女性肺癌发生风险的研究发现,激素替代治疗可能增加、不增加甚至降低肺癌发生风险。近年来随着个体化给予低剂量的雌和(或)孕激素及新型激素的应用,使激素替代治疗更倾向于不增加肺癌发生风险。目前认为激素替代治疗不构成女性肺癌风险,在适宜人群中应用安全性高的激素,使适龄妇女在低风险的情况下获得最大收益。     

Estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in Canada

Objective: To examine the association between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use and breast cancer incidence and to determine whether the association differs according to type of regimen. Method: Data were collected in Ontario from 404 incident cases and 403 age frequency-matched controls, between 1995 and 1996, using a self-administered questionnaire. Results: Multivariate analyses revealed an elevated odds ratio among long-term (ten years) HRT users (odds ratio (OR) = 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–3.06). Risk among long-term estrogen–progestin users was substantially higher (OR = 3.48, 95% CI 1.00–12.11) than risk among long-term users of estrogen alone (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 0.93–3.24). Among both estrogen and estrogen–progestin users, positive associations were not observed for durations of use less than ten years. Conclusion: These data suggest that long-term use of HRT increases the risk of breast cancer and that estrogen–progestin therapy may be more detrimental than estrogen use alone.     

Breast cancer with different prognostic characteristics developing in Danish women using hormone replacement therapy

The aim of this study is to investigate the risk of developing prognostic different types of breast cancer in women using hormone replacement therapy (HRT). A total of 10 874 postmenopausal Danish Nurses were followed since 1993. Incident breast cancer cases and histopathological information were retrieved through the National Danish registries. The follow-up ended on 31 December 1999. Breast cancer developed in 244 women, of whom 172 were invasive ductal carcinomas. Compared to never users, current users of HRT had an increased risk of a hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but a neutral risk of receptor-negative breast cancer, relative risk (RR) 3.29 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.27-4.77) and RR 0.99 (95% CI: 0.42-2.36), respectively (P for difference=0.013). The risk of being diagnosed with low histological malignancy grade was higher than high malignancy grade with RR 4.13 (95% CI: 2.43-7.01) and RR 2.17 (95% CI: 1.42-3.30), respectively (P=0.063). For breast cancers with other prognostic characteristics, the risk was increased equally for the favourable and non favourable types. Current users of HRT experience a two- to four-fold increased risk of breast cancer with various prognostic characteristics, both the favourable and non favourable types. For receptor status, the risk with HRT was statistically significantly higher for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer compared to receptor-negative breast cancer.     

Postmenopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort

Epidemiological studies indicate that menopausal estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT) use is associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. Further data are needed on whether this association varies by specific prognostic factors and ethnicity. We conducted a cohort study among 55,371 African-American, Native Hawaiian, Japanese-American, Latina and White postmenopausal women aged 45-75 years old in the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC). A total of 1,615 incident invasive breast cancer cases were identified over an average of 7.3 years. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) were computed for the various forms of hormone therapy (HT). Assuming current users continued HT use to the end of follow-up, current EPT use was associated with a 29% increased risk of breast cancer per 5 years of use (95% confidence interval (CI) = 23-35%), and current estrogen therapy (ET) use with a 10% increase in risk per 5 years of use (95% CI = 5-16%). These figures increased to only a very small extent when we adjusted for the estimated 3% of such women who stop HT use per year of follow-up. EPT and ET use were associated with greater risk among leaner women, but the increase in risk with EPT use was still very evident in women with BMI > or =30 kg/m(2). Current EPT use was associated with increased risk for ER+/PR+, ER+/PR- and ER-/PR- tumors. There was little difference in risk by stage of disease or histologic subtype. The increase with EPT use was clearly seen in all 5 ethnic groups; and the increase with ET in 4 of the 5 groups.     

Risk of different histological types of postmenopausal breast cancer by type and regimen of menopausal hormone therapy

In a large population-based case-control study in Germany, including 3,464 breast cancer cases aged 50-74 at diagnosis and 6,657 population based and frequency matched controls, we investigated the effects of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) by type, regimen, timing and progestagenic constituent on postmenopausal breast cancer risk overall and according to histological type. Data were collected by face-to-face interviews. Logistic and polytomous logistic regression analysis were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95%-confidence intervals (95% CI). Risk of invasive breast cancer was significantly elevated in current users (OR, 1.73, 95% CI, 1.55-1.94) and heterogeneous by histological type (p < 0.01), being more than 2-fold higher for lobular and tubular than for ductal cancer. Risks for current users varied significantly by type and regimen of HT, with ORs per year of use of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.04-1.06) for continuous combined estrogen-progestagen, 1.03 (95% CI, 1.02-1.04) for cyclical EP and 1.01 (95% CI, 1.00-1.03) for estrogen-only therapy. No statistically significant increase in risk was observed after 5 years of cessation of HT use for any histological type. Analyses of progestagenic content by regimen revealed a significantly higher risk for continuously administered norethisterone- or levonorgestrel-derived progestagens than for continuously administered progesterone-derived progestagens (OR, 2.27, 95% CI, 1.98-2.62 vs. 1.47, 95% CI, 1.12-1.93, respectively, p = 0.003), which may be explained by dose rather than type of progestagen. These data suggest that the risks associated with menopausal HT differ by type and regimen of HT and histological type of breast cancer and may vary by progestagenic component, depending on the effective dose.     

Effect of lifetime lactation on breast cancer risk: a Korean women's cohort study

The objective of our study was to examine the effect of lifetime lactation on breast cancer risk among premenopausal women. The data were from a prospective cohort study with a follow-up period of 6 years in Korea (1995-2000). The cohort was composed of 110,604 premenopausal parous Korean women, aged 20 years and older, who received health insurance from the Korea Medical Insurance Corporation and who had medical evaluations in 1992 and 1994. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were tested, controlling for age, age at menarche, number of children, age at first pregnancy, oral contraceptive use, smoking, exercise and obesity. At baseline, 57,440 (51.9%) reported breastfeeding and 4,584 (4.1%) reported breastfeeding more than 24 months. From 1995-2000, 360 incident cases of breast cancer (61.8/100,000 person-years) occurred. Compared to parous women who had no history of lactation, a period of lactation of 13-24 months decreased the risk of breast cancer (RR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-1.1), and this risk was decreased even further for those who breastfed for more than 24 months (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3-1.0). There was a clear trend of decreasing breast cancer risk with the duration of lactation (p for trend <0.001). In conclusion, our study of a large Korean cohort provides additional empirical evidence to current theoretical conjecture that lactation decreases the risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women.     

Oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, reproductive history and risk of colorectal cancer in women

Evidence from epidemiologic studies suggests a possible role of exogenous and endogenous hormones in colorectal carcinogenesis in women. However, with respect to exogenous hormones, in contrast to hormone replacement therapy, few cohort studies have examined oral contraceptive use in relation to colorectal cancer risk. We used data from a large cohort study of Canadian women enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of breast cancer screening to assess the association of oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy and reproductive factors with risk of colorectal cancer, overall and by subsite within the colorectum. Cancer incidence and mortality were ascertained by linkage to national databases. Among 89,835 women aged 40-59 at enrollment and followed for an average of 16.4 years, we identified 1,142 incident colorectal cancer cases. Proportional hazards models were used to estimate the associations between the exposures of interest and risk of colorectal cancer. Ever use of oral contraceptives at baseline was associated with a modest reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.94), with similar effects for different subsites within the colorectum. No trend was seen in the hazard ratios with increasing duration of oral contraceptive use. No associations were seen with use of hormone replacement therapy (ever use or duration of use) or reproductive factors. Our results are suggestive of an inverse association between oral contraceptive use and colorectal carcinogenesis. However, given the lack of a dose-response relationship and the potential for confounding, studies with more complete assessment of exogenous hormone use throughout the life course are needed to clarify this association.     

Previous oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk according to hormone replacement therapy use among postmenopausal women

Objective To assess postmenopausal breast cancer risk in relation to particular patterns of oral contraceptive (OC) use according to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) exposure.Methods Time-dependent Cox regression models were used to analyse information on postmenopausal women from a large-scale French cohort. Among a total of 68,670 women born between 1925 and 1950, 1405 primary invasive postmenopausal breast cancer cases were identified from 1992 to 2000.Results A non-significant decrease in risk of around 10% was associated with ever OC use as compared to never OC use in postmenopausal women. No significant interaction was found between OC and HRT use on postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Breast cancer risk decreased significantly with increasing time since first OC use (test for trend: p=0.01); this was consistent after adjustment for duration of use or for time since last use.Conclusion No increase in breast cancer risk was associated with previous OC exposure among postmenopausal women, probably because the induction window had closed. Some women may develop breast cancer soon after exposure to OCs, leading to a deficit of cases of older women. Further investigation is therefore required to identify young women at high risk.* Address correspondence to: F. Clavel-Chapelon, Equipe E3N-EPIC, INSERM “Nutrition, Hormones, Cancer”, Institut Gustave-Roussy, 94805 – Villejuif, France.     

Combined effect of oral contraceptive use and hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: We examined breast cancer risk related to lifetime exposure to oral contraceptives (OCs) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. METHODS: The Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences (CARE) Study was a population-based case-control study that included 1847 postmenopausal women with incident invasive breast cancer, and 1932 control subjects, identified using random digit dialing. RESULTS: 45% of cases and 49% of controls used both OCs and HRT. OC users were not at increased risk regardless of subsequent HRT exposure. HRT users who had used OCs previously did not have a higher risk of breast cancer than women with no exposure to OCs. We observed a negative interaction (p-value: 0.032) of combined hormone replacement therapy (CHRT) and past OC use. The increase in risk with CHRT was stronger in women who had never used OCs in the past (odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.10 per year of exclusive CHRT use) than in women who had used OCs (odds ratio: 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: We found no indication that adverse effects of exposure to OCs or HRT appeared only in the presence of the other hormone or were exacerbated by exposure to the other hormone.     

Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug use and breast cancer risk in a European prospective cohort study

Experimental studies have shown a protective effect of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on breast cancer development. However, results from epidemiological cohort studies are less consistent. Our objective was to assess the association between NSAID use and breast cancer risk within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). EPIC is a prospective cohort study initiated in 1992 in 10 European countries. Self‐reported information on NSAID use at baseline has been collected in five EPIC countries. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios for the association of NSAID use with breast cancer incidence with adjustment for potential confounders. We also assessed effect modification by breast cancer risk factors and examined the associations within specific breast cancer subtypes. Among the 140,981 women included in the analysis, 7% were regularly using NSAIDs at baseline. During a median follow‐up time period of 13 years, 7,379 incident breast cancer cases were diagnosed (816 in situ and 6,563 invasive). There were no statistically significant associations between NSAID use and breast cancer risk, overall and by subtypes. However, a statistically significant interaction was observed for invasive cases between NSAID use and ever use of menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) among postmenopausal women [MHT users: HR_{NSAID use} = 0.84 (0.73–0.96); non MHT users: HR_{NSAID use} = 1.08 (0.93–1.25); p_interaction = 0.05]. Our results indicate potential effect modification of MHT use on the association between use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk which deserves in‐depth investigation in studies with accurate data on both NSAID and MHT use.     

The effect of estrogen usage on the subsequent hormone receptor status of primary breast cancer

In order to determine if prior use of exogenous estrogens was related to the estrogen receptor (ER) content of primary breast cancers, a retrospective analysis was performed from 536 patients with invasive breast cancer. The patient's age, menopausal status, oral contraceptive or estrogen replacement therapy usage, and the ER and progesterone receptor (PR) content of the breast cancer were recorded for all patients. Hormone usage in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients was compared to ER and PR levels in primary breast cancers using nonparametric testing. Complete information was available from 508 (193 premenopausal and 315 postmenopausal) patients. Breast cancers were ER positive in 72% of postmenopausal patients and 57% of premenopausal patients. The majority of patients received 'Some' form of hormone therapy (111 of 193 premenopausal patients and 233 of 315 postmenopausal patients). Significantly more estrogen receptors were detected in tumors from patients receiving 'some' estrogen therapy compared to 'never' users. Postmenopausal patients 'never receiving estrogen therapy had a lower rate of ER positive tumors (62%) compared to 'some' users (75% ²=4.99, p<0.05). The same relationship was seen for PR ('never' users 44% positive, 'some' users 58% positive, ²=5.19, p<0.05). We conclude that postmenopausal patients who received 'some' estrogen therapy are more likely to have breast cancers that are estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive.     

Postmenopausal hormone use and breast cancer associations differ by hormone regimen and histologic subtype

BACKGROUND:

Data from large prospective studies are needed to fully characterize the impact of exogenous hormones on breast cancer incidence by type of hormone preparation and histology of the cancer.

METHODS:

In a prospective cohort of 67,754 postmenopausal women in the US, 1821 cases of invasive ductal cancer and 471 cases of invasive lobular or mixed lobular cancer occurred during 13 years of follow‐up. The authors computed age‐adjusted rates, as well as age‐adjusted and multivariate‐adjusted rate ratios (RR) for ductal and lobular breast cancer and for the use of estrogen only (E‐only) and estrogen and progesterone (E + P) for current and former hormone users by duration of use and years since last use.

RESULTS:

Current use of E + P was associated with an increased risk of both ductal (RR of 1.75; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.53‐2.01) and lobular (RR of 2.12; 95% CI, 1.62‐2.77) breast cancer. Risk increased within the first 2 to 3 years of use and attenuated 2 years after cessation. In contrast, current use of E‐only was not associated with an overall increased risk of invasive ductal cancer. The only exceptions to this finding were in lean (body mass index <25) women and for ductal cancers diagnosed at the regional/distant stage, where in both cases the use of E‐only was associated with an increased risk. E‐only use was associated with a 50% increased risk of invasive lobular cancer after ≥10 years of use.

CONCLUSIONS:

Use of E + P is more detrimental to the breast than E‐only use, in terms of both ductal and lobular cancer. The findings from the current study suggest a window of 2 to 3 years for the risks of E + P both to become apparent after initial use and to attenuate after cessation. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Long-term weight change and breast cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)

We examined prospectively the association between weight change during adulthood and breast cancer risk, using data on 1358 incident cases that developed during 5.8 years of follow-up among 40,429 premenopausal and 57,923 postmenopausal women from six European countries, taking part in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition study. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios according to weight change (kg), defined as the weight difference between age at enrollment and age 20 adjusted for other risk factors. Changes in weight were not associated with premenopausal breast cancer risk. In postmenopausal women, weight gain was positively associated with breast cancer risk only among noncurrent hormone replacement therapy (HRT) users (P-trend < or = 0.0002). Compared to women with a stable weight (+/-2 kg), the relative risk for women who gained 15-20 kg was 1.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.13). The pooled RR per weight gain increment of 5 kg was 1.08 (95% CI 1.04-1.12). Weight gain was not associated with breast cancer risk in current HRT users, although, overall, these women experienced a much higher risk of breast cancer compared with nonusers. Our findings suggest that large adult weight gain was a significant predictor of breast cancer in postmenopausal women not taking exogenous hormones.     

Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer by histologic type (United States)

Objective: Postmenopausal hormone use and risk of breast cancer by histopathology was examined in a large multi-centered population-based case–control study. Methods: Women younger than 75 years newly diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1988 and 1991 were identified from statewide tumour registries in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine. Only postmenopausal women were included in this analysis. Breast cancer cases (lobular (n = 219), ductal, NOS (n = 2172), and specific ductal subtypes (n = 242)) were compared with randomly selected population controls (n = 3179) using adjusted multi-variable polytomous logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for each histology. Results: Lobular carcinoma was associated with recent (within 2 years) estrogen therapy (OR:1.8, 95%CI: 1.0–3.4) and recent use of combined estrogen-plus-progestin therapy (OR:3.6, 95%CI: 1.8–7.6). Risk of ductal carcinoma was not associated with recent use of either estrogen alone (OR: 0.9, 95%CI: 0.7–1.2) or combined therapy (OR:0.9, 95%CI: 0.6–1.3). No associations were found with ductal subtypes. Conclusions: The association between postmenopausal hormone use and risk of breast cancer may depend on histopathology. Of particular interest is the association between combined hormone therapy and increased risk of lobular carcinoma. This lesion is increasingly common but, nonetheless, comprises fewer than 10% of invasive breast cancers.