Comparison of gefitinib and erlotinib in advanced NSCLC and the effect of EGFR mutations

Introduction

Erlotinib and gefitinib are tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that are effective in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to compare their clinical uses and the influence of EGFR mutation.

Methods

The usages of erlotinib and gefitinib in advanced NSCLC were analyzed. Clinical data and EGFR mutational status of tumors were collected.

Results

Seven hundred and sixteen (716) patients received gefitinib (n = 440) or erlotinib (n = 276) for stage IIIb or IV NSCLC. Erlotinib was prescribed more frequently than gefitinib in males (58.2% vs. 41.8%, p < 0.001), smokers (60.5% vs. 39.5%, p < 0.001), and non-adenocarcinoma (70.6% vs. 29.4%, p < 0.001). Of the 716 study patients, 327 underwent testing for EGFR mutations (170 with mutant EGFR and 157 with wild-type EGFR). Adenocarcinoma in patients with mutant EGFR and non-smoker status in patients with wild-type EGFR were associated with better overall survival after TK inhibitor treatment. In both patient groups with mutant EGFR or wild-type EGFR, the effectiveness of gefitinib and erlotinib, including drug response or overall survival, were not different.

Conclusions

Our study revealed the obvious disparity in drug selection between erlotinib and gefitinib in clinical practice. Type of TK inhibitors did not influence treatment outcomes in patients with EGFR mutation or wild-type EGFR.     

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer

First-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), including gefitinib and erlotinib, have proven to be highly effective agents for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients harboring an activating EGFR mutation such as the exon 19 deletion mutation and L858R. Although those reversible small molecular targeted agents provide a significant response and survival benefit, all responders eventually acquire resistance. Second-generation EGFR-targeting agents, such as irreversible EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors and pan-HER TKIs, may improve survival further and be useful for patients who acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. This review discusses novel therapeutic strategies for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC using first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs.     

Randomized phase II study of gefitinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who failed previous chemotherapy

Purpose

Gefitinib and erlotinib are potent EGFR TKIs, with antitumor activity. In this randomized, single-center, non-comparative phase II trial, the efficacy and safety of gefitinib and erlotinib was evaluated as the second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods

Patients with locally advanced, metastatic stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy and had either EGFR mutation or at least two out of three clinical factors associated with higher incidence of EGFR mutations (female, adenocarcinoma histology, and never-smoker) were eligible.

Results

A total of 96 (48 per arm) patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib- or erlotinib-arm, respectively. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two arms. The response rates (RR) were 47.9% in the gefitinib arm and 39.6% in the erlotinib arm. Median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI, 1.3-8.5) in the gefitinib arm and 3.1 months (95% CI, 0.0-6.4) in the erlotinib arm. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was skin rash. Exploratory analyses showed that there was no significant difference in RR and PFS in the gefitinib arm compared to the erlotinib arm (RR (%) 47.9 vs. 39.6, p = 0.269; median survival (months) 4.9 vs. 3.1, p = 0.336). There was no significant difference in QOL between the two arms.

Conclusion

Both gefitinib and erlotinib showed effective activity and tolerable toxicity profiles as second-line treatment for the selected population of NSCLC. We may consider conducting a phase III trial to directly compare the efficacy and toxicity between gefitinib and erlotinib in an enriched patient population.     

Biological Characteristics and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Efficacy of EGFR Mutation and its Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene has been reported to be present in lung adenocarcinoma (LAC). In this study, we extensively investigated the impact of patients’ biological characteristics on EGFR mutation and the impact of EGFR mutation subtypes on targeted therapy of advanced LAC. We examined EGFR exons18to21status in169 LAC patients by direct sequencing to study the impact of patients’ biological characteristics on the EGFR mutational spectrum. And then, 59 patients with advanced LAC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions(del 19) or exon 21 point mutation(L858R) mutations received first-line treatment of gefitinib or erlotinib, the efficacy of treatment, and the progression-free survival (PFS) of these patients were recorded. The frequency of the EGFR mutation and its subtypes and the variables associated with the EGFR mutation after removing the confound factors were investigated by the logistic analysis using all samples (n?=?169). The EGFR mutation was significantly associated with well-differentiated tumor and excessive household cooking fumes(P?<?0.05). The deletions in exon 19 were more frequently associated with well-differentiated tumor (P?<?0.05). The overall frequency of the EGFR mutation was 49 %. Then the impact of EGFR mutation subtypes on targeted therapy were investigated by the retrospective analysis on 59 advanced LAC patients with del 19 or L858R mutations and treated first-line with erlotinib or gefitinib. The deletions in exon 19 got longer PFS (P?<?0.05). But there were no differences in PFS between erlotinib therapy and gefitinib therapy. EGFR mutations were more frequently in high tumor differentiation and excessive household cooking fumes LAC. The del 19 mutation rate is relatively high with a high differentiation degree in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The deletions in exon 19 may benefit more from first-line targeted therapy of advanced LAC compared with exon 21 point mutation L858R. There was no significant difference between the efficacy of gefitinib and erlotinib treatments associated with EGFR mutation and its subtypes.     

EGFR mutation frequency and effectiveness of erlotinib: A prospective observational study in Danish patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objectives

In 2008, we initiated a prospective study to explore the frequency and predictive value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in an unselected population of Danish patients with non-small cell lung cancer offered treatment with erlotinib, mainly in second-line.

Materials and methods

Four hundred and eighty eight patients with advanced NSCLC were included. The mutation status was assessed using the cobas^® EGFR Mutation Test. Erlotinib was administrated (150 mg/d) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and response.

Results

Biopsies were retrieved from 467 patients, and mutation results obtained for 462. We identified 57 (12%) patients with EGFR mutations: 33 exon 19 deletions, 13 exon 21 mutations, 5 exon 18 mutations, 3 exon 20 insertions, 1 exon 20 point mutation (S768I), and two complex mutations. Seven percent of the patients were never smokers. The differences in median progression-free survival and overall survival between the mutated group and the wild-type group were 8.0 vs. 2.5 months, p < 0.001 and 12.1 vs. 3.9 months, p < 0.001. Performance status (0–1 vs. 2–3) and line of treatment (1st vs. 2nd and 3rd) had no influence on outcome in EGFR-mutated patients.

Conclusion

We found a higher frequency of EGFR mutations than expected in a cohort with less than 10% never smokers. The outcome after treatment with erlotinib was much better in patients with EGFR mutations than in patients with wild-type EGFR and was independent of performance status and treatment line in EGFR-mutated patients.     

Screening for EGFR mutations in lung cancer, a report from India

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of the targeted molecular markers in many cancers including the lung malignancy. Genetic modifications such as deletions, insertions and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain of EGFR is a common feature observed in most lung cancers. Gefitinib and erlotinib are commonly available therapeutic drugs which act as specific inhibitors for the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR and associated with EGFR mutations in exons 18-21. However the prevalence of mutation varies among ethnicity, grade, age and gender. This is the first report on the prevalence of EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer patients using DNA obtained from samples such as biopsy/cytology/pleural fluid and Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA), across India. We have screened for 29 somatic mutations which span exons 18, 19, 20 and 21 of EGFR gene using Scorpion probe based ARMS-PCR technique. DNA from 220 NSCLC tissue samples were analyzed for EGFR mutations and mutations were detected in 51.8% of the study population. Among the mutant positive cases, the deletions in exon 19 (52%) and a missense mutation L858R in exon 21 (26%) were most predominant. There was a significant increase in overall mutations (p = 0.01) as a function of age, mutation in exons 19 and 21 together (p = 0.003), mutations in exons 18, 19 and 21 (p = 0.04) and mutations in exons 18 and 19 (p = 0.03) in females. Mutations did not seem to significantly correlate metastases or disease progression. Mutations in exons [19] and 21 together were significant in non-smokers compared to smokers (p = 0.01) using Mann-Whitney tests. The study suggests high prevalence of EGFR positivity in NSCLC in Indian sub-population and provides opportunities for targeted therapies for this group.     

Revisiting Clinical Trials Using EGFR Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of an MD Anderson Cancer Center Phase I Population

Purpose

Single-agent EGFR inhibitor therapy is effective mainly in patients with lung cancer and EGFR mutations. Treating patients who develop resistance, or who are insensitive from the outset, often because of resistant mutations, other aberrations or the lack of an EGFR mutation, probably requires rational combinations. We therefore investigated the outcome of EGFR inhibitor-based combination regimens in patients with heavily-pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) referred to a Phase I Clinic.

Methods

We reviewed the electronic records of patients with NSCLC treated with an EGFR inhibitor-based combination regimen: erlotinib and cetuximab; erlotinib, cetuximab and bevacizumab; erlotinib and dasatinib; erlotinib and bortezomib; or cetuximab and sirolimus.

Results

EGFR mutations were detected in 16% of patients (21/131). EGFR inhibitor-based combination regimens were administered to 15 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and 24 with EGFR wild-type disease. Stable disease (SD) ≥6 months/partial remission (PR) was attained in 20% of EGFR-mutant patients (3/15; two with sensitive mutations and secondary resistance to prior erlotinib, and one with a resistant mutation), as well as 26% of evaluable patients (5/19) with wild-type disease. One of three evaluable patients with squamous cell histology achieved SD for 26.5 months (EGFR wild-type, TP53-mutant, regimen=erlotinib, cetuximab and bevacizumab).

Conclusions

Eight of 34 evaluable patients (24%) with advanced, refractory NSCLC evaluable for response achieved SD ≥6 months/PR (PR=3; SD ≥6 months=5) on EGFR inhibitor-based combination regimens (erlotinib, cetuximab; erlotinib, cetuximab and bevacizumab; and, erlotinib, bortezomib), including patients with secondary resistance to single-agent EGFR inhibitors, resistant mutations, wild-type disease, and, squamous histology.     

Acquired resistance to erlotinib in A-431 epidermoid cancer cells requires down-regulation of MMAC1/PTEN and up-regulation of phosphorylated Akt

Erlotinib (Tarceva), an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has clinical activity in advanced lung cancer, but disease that initially responds to erlotinib eventually progresses. The mechanism of this acquired resistance is unclear. We established two erlotinib-resistant pools of A-431 cells, a well-characterized epidermoid cancer cell line that constitutively overexpresses EGFR and is sensitive to erlotinib, by continuous exposure to erlotinib over a 6-month period. The extent of EGFR gene amplification or mutation of the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain was not altered in the resistant cells. Intracellular erlotinib concentrations, determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, were almost the same in all three cell lines. Immunoprecipitation with EGFR antibody followed by detection with phosphotyrosine antibody revealed that erlotinib effectively reduced EGFR phosphorylation in both parental cells and resistant cells. Erlotinib induced mutated in multiple advanced cancers 1/phosphatase and tensin homologue (MMAC1/PTEN) and suppressed phosphorylated Akt (Ser(473)) but not in the erlotinib-resistant cells. Overexpression of MMAC1/PTEN by transfection with Ad.MMAC1/PTEN or by pharmacologic suppression of Akt activity restored erlotinib sensitivity in both resistant pools. Further, transfection of parental A-431 cells with constitutively active Akt was sufficient to cause resistance to erlotinib. We propose that acquired erlotinib resistance associated with MMAC1/PTEN down-regulation and Akt activation could be overcome by inhibitors of signaling through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway.     

First-line therapy and methylation status of CHFR in serum influence outcome to chemotherapy versus EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors as second-line therapy in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients

The potential differential effect of first-line treatment and molecular mechanisms on survival to second-line chemotherapy or EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully investigated. In particular, CHFR is frequently methylated in NSCLC and may influence outcome. We analyzed the outcome of second-line chemotherapy or EGFR TKIs in 179 of 366 patients who had been treated in an ERCC1 mRNA-based customized cisplatin trial and correlated the results with CHFR methylation status. CHFR methylation in circulating DNA was examined by methylation-specific assay. A panel of seven human EGFR wild-type NSCLC cell lines was characterized for their sensitivity to sequential treatment with cisplatin and erlotinib, and the results were correlated with CHFR. Patients who had received first-line docetaxel/cisplatin attained an overall survival of 19.2 months when treated with second-line EGFR TKIs, in comparison with 10.7 months when treated with second-line chemotherapy (P = 0.0002). However, for patients who had received first-line docetaxel/gemcitabine, overall survival was 14.8 months with EGFR TKIs and 10.8 months with chemotherapy (P = 0.29). For patients with unmethylated CHFR overall survival to EGFR TKIs was 21.4 months, and 11.2 months for those with treated with chemotherapy (P = 0.0001). In the only lung tumor cell line not expressing CHFR, pretreatment with cisplatin was antagonistic to erlotinib, while it was synergistic in the other six lines. Second-line EGFR TKIs improved survival in patients receiving first-line cisplatin-based treatment. Unmethylated CHFR predicts increased survival to EGFR TKIs.     

Risk of interstitial lung disease with gefitinib and erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Objectives

Gefitinib and erlotinib are oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) widely used in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) events have been described with these agents, although the overall risk remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence and the relative risk (RR) associated with the use of gefitinib and erlotinib.

Materials and methods

PubMed databases were searched for articles published from January 2000 to October 2012, and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology meetings held between 2000 and 2012 were searched for relevant studies. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials with gefitinib and erlotinib in advanced NSCLC patients. Summary incidence rates, relative risks, and 95% CIs were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies.

Results

15,618 patients from 29 randomized controlled trials were selected for this meta-analysis. The overall incidence for all-grade ILD events was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.9–1.6%) among patients receiving gefitinib and erlotinib, with a mortality of 22.8% (95% CI, 14.6–31.0%). Compared with controls, the RR of all-grade ILD events associated with gefitinib and erlotinib was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.13–2.08; P = 0.006) using a fixed-effects model. The RR of fatal ILD events associated with EGFR TKIs treatment was 1.96 (95% CI, 1.03–3.72, P = 0.041) compared with control patients. The analysis was also stratified for drug type, study location, treatment arm, and treatment line, but no significant differences in RRs were observed.

Conclusion

Treatment with EGFR TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib is associated with a significant increase in the risk of developing both all-grade and fatal ILD events in advanced NSCLC.     

JAK2‐related pathway induces acquired erlotinib resistance in lung cancer cells harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor‐activating mutation

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib and erlotinib, are effective for non‐small cell lung cancer with activating EGFR mutations. However, even in patients with an initial dramatic response to such a drug, acquired resistance develops after 6–12 months. A secondary mutation of T790M in EGFR and amplification of the MET gene account for this resistance; however, the mechanism(s) of approximately 30% of acquired resistance cases remain unknown. We established an erlotinib‐resistant lung cancer cell line named PC‐9/ER3 that harbors an EGFR mutation after continuously exposing PC‐9 cells to erlotinib. PC‐9/ER3 cells were 136‐fold more resistant to erlotinib than the parental cells. Although the PC‐9/ER3 cells did not carry the T790M mutation or MET amplification and had similar levels of phosphorylated (p) STAT3, pJAK2 increased in the resistant cells. It was found in the present study that 3–12 h of exposure to erlotinib in both cell lines did not affect pJAK2 expression, but did result in increased pSTAT3 expression. pAkt in PC‐9/ER3 cells was less suppressed than in PC‐9 cells, although pEGFR and pMAPK were markedly suppressed in both cell lines. The combined treatment of erlotinib plus a JAK2 inhibitor (JSI‐124) suppressed pAkt in PC‐9/ER3 cells. Similarly, the combination of erlotinib plus JSI‐124 or siRNA against JAK2 restored sensitivity to erlotinib in PC‐9/ER3 cells. The combination of erlotinib plus JSI‐124 was also effective for reducing PC‐9/ER3 tumors in a murine xenograft model. Our results suggest that the activation of JAK2 partially accounts for acquired erlotinib resistance.(Cancer Sci, doi: 10.1111/j.1349‐7006.2012.02363.x, 2012)     

Bronchial and peripheral murine lung carcinomas induced by T790M-L858R mutant EGFR respond to HKI-272 and rapamycin combination therapy

The EGFR T790M mutation has been identified in tumors from lung cancer patients that eventually develop resistance to erlotinib. In this study, we generated a mouse model with doxycycline-inducible expression of a mutant EGFR containing both L858R, an erlotinib-sensitizing mutation, and the T790M resistance mutation (EGFR TL). Expression of EGFR TL led to development of peripheral adenocarcinomas with bronchioloalveolar features in alveoli as well as papillary adenocarcinomas in bronchioles. Treatment with an irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), HKI-272, shrunk only peripheral tumors but not bronchial tumors. However, the combination of HKI-272 and rapamycin resulted in significant regression of both types of lung tumors. This combination therapy may potentially benefit lung cancer patients with the EGFR T790M mutation.     

Evaluation of EGFR protein expression by immunohistochemistry using H-score and the magnification rule: Re-analysis of the SATURN study

Introduction

The phase III SATURN study demonstrated that first-line maintenance erlotinib extended progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) found no significant interaction between EGFR IHC status and PFS (p = 0.63) or OS (p = 0.52). The FLEX study of first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy demonstrated that EGFR IHC expression was predictive of improved OS with cetuximab when assessed by H-score with a magnification rule. This novel method was used to reassess samples from SATURN.

Methods

The H-score method assigned a score of 0–300 to each patient, based on the percentage of cells stained at different intensities viewed at various magnifications. The discriminatory threshold was set at 200, per the FLEX study, and existing samples were re-read and classed as low (H-score < 200) or high (≥200) EGFR expression. PFS and OS were re-analyzed based on these new classifications.

Results

In the overall and EGFR wild-type populations, erlotinib provided a consistent survival benefit versus placebo. Hazard ratios (HRs) in the overall population were similar between EGFR IHC-positive and -negative patients for median PFS (HR 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–0.86] and 0.76 [95% CI 0.62–0.93], respectively) and OS (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.62–1.05] and 0.80 [95% CI 0.64–1.01] for IHC-positive and IHC-negative, respectively). In the EGFR wild-type population, HRs were again similar between EGFR IHC-positive and -negative subpopulations for PFS (HR 0.69 [95% CI 0.51–0.95] and 0.84 [95% CI 0.63–1.12], respectively) and OS (HR 0.78 [95% CI 0.55–1.10] and 0.76 [95% CI 0.55–1.05], respectively).

Conclusions

These data suggest that EGFR IHC does not have value as a marker to predict erlotinib benefit in the first-line maintenance setting for advanced NSCLC.     

Schedule-dependent antitumor activity of the combination with erlotinib and docetaxel in human non-small cell lung cancer cells with EGFR mutation, KRAS mutation or both wild-type EGFR and KRAS

Erlotinib is used as a standard treatment for recurrent advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in NSCLC have been shown to be a predictive factor of erlotinib, although the relationship between K-ras oncogene (KRAS) mutations and erlotinib resistance is controversial. Recently, in vitro sequence-dependent interactions of erlotinib and docetaxel have been studied on as a novel therapeutic approach against NSCLC. The purpose of the present study was to determine the optimum novel regimen of erlotinib and docetaxel against NSCLC cells which have EGFR mutation (HCC827 cells), KRAS mutation (A549 cells) or both wild-type (NCI-H292 cells). First, we analyzed the effects of in vitro combination for cell proliferation-inhibition using a combination index. In all cell lines, docetaxel followed by erlotinib treatment showed nearly additive effects. On the other hand, erlotinib followed by docetaxel treatment showed remarkable antagonistic interactions. Second, we examined the effect of combinations on the in vitro apoptosis induction. Erlotinib followed by docetaxel treatment reduced apoptosis induction compared with docetaxel alone; in contrast, docetaxel followed by erlotinib treatment had no inhibitory effects on docetaxel-induced apoptosis in any of the cell lines. Finally, an in vivo tumor growth inhibition test was performed using xenograft models. Docetaxel followed by erlotinib administration resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition compared with erlotinib or docetaxel monotherapy in all models. In conclusion, we demonstrated that docetaxel followed by erlotinib therapy was a potentially optimum regimen against NSCLC regardless of the mutation status of EGFR and KRAS.     

Poor response to erlotinib in patients with tumors containing baseline EGFR T790M mutations found by routine clinical molecular testing

BackgroundEGFR T790M is the most common mutation associated with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Baseline EGFR T790M mutations in EGFR TKI-naïve patients have been reported, but the frequency and their association with response to EGFR TKIs remain unclear.Patients and methodsThe frequency of baseline EGFR T790M as detected by routine molecular genotyping was determined by reviewing clinical results obtained at our institution from 2009 to 2013. We also collected outcome data for treatment with EGFR TKIs.ResultsTo define the incidence of EGFR T790M, we reviewed 2774 sequentially tested patients with lung cancer who underwent molecular testing using a mass spectrometry-based assay, and 11 (0.5%) had baseline EGFR T790M. Compiling results from several molecular techniques, we observed EGFR T790M in tumors from 20 patients who had not previously been treated with an EGFR TKI. In all cases, EGFR T790M occurred concurrently with another EGFR mutation, L858R (80%, 16/20), or exon 19 deletion (20%, 4/20). Two percent of all pre-treatment EGFR-mutant lung cancers harbored an EGFR T790M mutation. Thirteen patients received erlotinib monotherapy as treatment for metastatic disease. The response rate was 8% (1/13, 95% confidence interval 0%–35%). For the patients who received erlotinib, the median progression-free survival was 2 months and the median overall survival was 16 months.ConclusionsDe novo EGFR T790M mutations are rare (<1%) when identified by standard sensitivity methods. TKI therapy for patients with baseline EGFR T790M detected by standard molecular analysis has limited benefit.     

Acquired Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancers Dependent on the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway

Most advanced Non–Small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (exon 19 deletions or L858R) initially respond to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib. However, over time (median of 6–12 months), most tumors develop acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs. Intense research in these NSCLCs has identified two major mechanisms of resistance to gefitinib/erlotinib: secondary resistance mutations and “oncogene kinase switch" systems. The secondary T790M mutation occurs in 50% of EGFR-mutated patients with TKI resistance, and in vitro, this mutation negates the hypersensitivity of activating EGFR mutations. Sensitive detection methods have identified a proportion of TKI-naive tumors that carry T790M, and these resistant clones may be selected after exposure to gefitinib or erlotinib. Other secondary resistance mutations (D761Y, L747S, T854A) seem to be rare. The amplification of the MET oncogene is present in 20% of TKI-resistant tumors; however, in half of the cases with this “oncogene kinase switch" mechanism the T790M is coexistent. It is possible that other kinases (such as insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor [IGF-1R]) might also be selected to bypass EGFR pathways in resistant tumors. The growing preclinical data in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib has spawned the initiation or conception of clinical trials testing novel EGFR inhibitors that in vitro inhibit T790M (neratinib, XL647, BIBW 2992, and PF-00299804), MET, or IGF-1R inhibitors in combination with EGFR TKIs, and heat shock protein 90 inhibitors. Ongoing preclinical and clinical research in EGFR-mutated NSCLC has the potential to significantly improve the outcomes of patients with these somatic mutations.     

Proapoptotic BH3-only BCL-2 family protein BIM connects death signaling from epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition to the mitochondrion

A subset of lung cancers expresses mutant forms of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that are constitutively activated. Cancers bearing activated EGFR can be effectively targeted with EGFR inhibitors such as erlotinib. However, the death-signaling pathways engaged after EGFR inhibition are poorly understood. Here, we show that death after inhibition of EGFR uses the mitochondrial, or intrinsic, pathway of cell death controlled by the BCL-2 family of proteins. BCL-2 inhibits cell death induced by erlotinib, but BCL-2-protected cells are thus rendered BCL-2-dependent and sensitive to the BCL-2 antagonist ABT-737. BH3 profiling reveals that mitochondrial BCL-2 is primed by death signals after EGFR inhibition in these cells. As this result implies, key death-signaling proteins of the BCL-2 family, including BIM, were found to be up-regulated after erlotinib treatment and intercepted by overexpressed BCL-2. BIM is induced by lung cancer cell lines that are sensitive to erlotinib but not by those resistant. Reduction of BIM by siRNA induces resistance to erlotinib. We show that EGFR activity is inhibited by erlotinib in H1650, a lung cancer cell line that bears a sensitizing EGFR mutation, but that H1650 is not killed. We identify the block in apoptosis in this cell line, and show that a novel form of erlotinib resistance is present, a block in BIM up-regulation downstream of EGFR inhibition. This finding has clear implications for overcoming resistance to erlotinib. Resistance to EGFR inhibition can be modulated by alterations in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway controlled by the BCL-2 family of proteins.     

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and their role in non-small-cell lung cancer

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a promising target in the treatment of advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently erlotinib and gefitinib are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, whereas cetuximab is being studied for use in NSCLC. Erlotinib has shown a survival advantage in patients with advanced NSCLC. Further studies have identified female sex, nonsmokers, Asian race, good performance status, and adenocarcinoma histology as predictors of patient response to these agents. A genetic mutation in EGFR has also been correlated with an increase in response.