High Prevalence of Concomitant Oncogene Mutations in Prospectively Identified Patients with ROS1-Positive Metastatic Lung Cancer

ObjectivesChromosomal rearrangements involving ROS1 define a rare entity of lung adenocarcinomas with exquisite sensitivity to molecularly targeted therapy. We report clinical outcomes and genomic findings of patients with ROS1-positive lung cancer who were prospectively identified within a multiplex biomarker profiling program at the West German Cancer Center.MethodsStandardized immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and hotspot mutation analyses were performed in 1345 patients with advanced cancer, including 805 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Clinical and epidemiological data were retrieved from the institutional database.ResultsROS1 positivity by IHC analysis was detected in 25 patients with lung cancer (4.8% of lung adenocarcinomas), including 13 patients (2.5%) with ROS1 FISH positivity with a cutoff of at least 15% of events. Of the ROS1 IHC analysis–positive cases, 36% presented with concomitant oncogenic driver mutations involving EGFR (six cases, five of which were clinically validated by response to EGFR-targeting agents), KRAS (two cases), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA), and BRAF. Three cases initially classified as ROS1 FISH–negative passed the threshold of 15% positive events when repeat biopsies were analyzed at progression. The median overall survival of the ROS1-positive patients (104 months) was significantly superior to that of the 261 patients with EGFR/anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS1–negative lung adenocarcinoma (24.4 months, p = 0.044). Interestingly, the overall survival of the 13 ROS1-positive patients with lung cancer from initiation of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy was significantly prolonged when compared with that of 169 pemetrexed-treated patients with EGFR/anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS1–negative adenocarcinoma (p = 0.01).ConclusionsROS1-positive metastatic lung adenocarcinomas frequently harbor concomitant oncogenic driver mutations. Levels of ROS1 FISH–positive events are variable over time. This heterogeneity provides additional therapeutic options if discovered by multiplex biomarker testing and repeat biopsies.     

Discrepancies between FISH and immunohistochemistry for assessment of the ALK status are associated with ALK ‘borderline’-positive rearrangements or a high copy number: a potential major issue for anti-ALK therapeutic strategies

BackgroundPatients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas expressing ALK rearrangements are highly responsive to crizotinib, a dual ALK/c-MET inhibitor. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an easy clinically and routinely applicable cost-effective assay for ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression for potential treatment with crizotinib. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the percentage and the pattern of ALK-rearranged cells, the variation in the native ALK copy number, as well as ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression, and their significance on outcome of crizotinib-treated lung adenocarcinoma patients.Patients and methodsConsecutive lung adenocarcinoma specimens (n = 176) ‘double-negative’ (wild-type EGFR and KRAS) were tested for ALK rearrangements/copy number alterations and for ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression using automated standardized protocols. Preliminary data on the outcome of crizotinib-treated patients were recorded.ResultsFISH analysis identified 26/176 (15%) cases with ALK rearrangements. Seven cases had discordant results between the ALK FISH and IHC. Five cases with discordant FISH-positive/IHC-negative revealed FISH ‘borderline’ positivity (15%–20%). Three cases overexpressed c-MET and responded to crizotinib, and two cases with ALK-‘borderline’ rearranged cells only, not associated with c-MET expression, progressed under crizotinib. Two cases with discordant FISH-negative/IHC-positive revealed ALK gene amplification without associated c-MET or ROS1 protein expression.ConclusionsThe discrepancies observed between the IHC and FISH data revealed unexpected biological events, rather than technical issues, which potentially can have a strong impact on the therapeutic strategy with crizotinib.     

Assessment of a New ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Clone (SP384) for the Identification of ROS1 Rearrangements in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: the ROSING Study

IntroductionThe ROS1 gene rearrangement has become an important biomarker in NSCLC. The College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecular Pathology testing guidelines support the use of ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening test, followed by confirmation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or a molecular test in all positive results. We have evaluated a novel anti-ROS1 IHC antibody (SP384) in a large multicenter series to obtain real-world data.MethodsA total of 43 ROS1 FISH–positive and 193 ROS1 FISH–negative NSCLC samples were studied. All specimens were screened by using two antibodies (clone D4D6 from Cell Signaling Technology and clone SP384 from Ventana Medical Systems), and the different interpretation criteria were compared with break-apart FISH (Vysis). FISH-positive samples were also analyzed with next-generation sequencing (Oncomine Dx Target Test Panel, Thermo Fisher Scientific).ResultsAn H-score of 150 or higher or the presence of at least 70% of tumor cells with an intensity of staining of 2+ or higher by the SP384 clone was the optimal cutoff value (both with 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity). The D4D6 clone showed similar results, with an H-score of at least 100 (91% sensitivity and 100% specificity). ROS1 expression in normal lung was more frequent with use of the SP384 clone (p < 0.0001). The ezrin gene (EZR)-ROS1 variant was associated with membranous staining and an isolated green signal FISH pattern (p = 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively).ConclusionsThe new SP384 ROS1 IHC clone showed excellent sensitivity without compromising specificity, so it is another excellent analytical option for the proposed testing algorithm.     

Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Assay (SP384) for Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in a Large Cohort of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

IntroductionThe detection of a ROS1 rearrangement in advanced and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) led to a targeted treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with favorable progression-free survival and overall survival of the patients. Thus, it is mandatory to screen for the ROS1 rearrangement in all these patients. ROS1 rearrangements can be detected using break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which is the gold standard; however, ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used as a screening test because it is widely available, easy and rapid to perform, and cost-effective.MethodsWe evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and interpathologist agreement of two anti-ROS1 IHC clones, SP384 (Ventana, Tucson, Arizona) and D4D6 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, Massachusetts), in a training cohort of 51 positive ROS1 FISH LUAD cases, and then in a large validation cohort of 714 consecutive cases of LUAD from six routine molecular pathology platforms.ResultsIn the two cohorts, the SP384 and D4D6 clones show variable sensitivity and specificity rates on the basis of two cutoff points greater than or equal to 1+ (all % tumor cells) and greater than or equal to 2+ (>30% stained tumor cells). In the validation cohort, the D4D6 yielded the best accuracy for the presence of a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. Interpathologist agreement was moderate to good (interclass correlation 0.722–0.874) for the D4D6 clone and good to excellent (interclass correlation: 0.830–0.956) for the SP384 clone.ConclusionsROS1 IHC is an effective screening tool for the presence of ROS1 rearrangements. However, users must be acutely aware of the variable diagnostic performance of different anti-ROS1 antibodies before implementation into routine clinical practice.     

A Sensitive ALK Immunohistochemistry Companion Diagnostic Test Identifies Patients Eligible for Treatment with Crizotinib

IntroductionThe availability of high-quality, rigorously validated diagnostic tests that can be broadly implemented is necessary to efficiently identify patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive NSCLC who can potentially benefit from treatment with crizotinib. Here we present data on the recently approved Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ), the only immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based assay linked to treatment outcome.MethodsNSCLC specimens prospectively tested for anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) status by flourescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in the PROFILE 1014 clinical trial of crizotinib versus chemotherapy (N = 1018, including 179 ALK-positive and 754 ALK-negative specimens) were evaluated using the ALK (D5F3) CDx assay. Hazard ratios for progression-free survival comparing crizotinib and chemotherapy for ALK IHC–positive patients and ALK FISH–positive patients, as well as for concordance with the enrollment ALK FISH assay, were determined.ResultsResults from both assays were obtained for 933 cases. Percent positive, negative, and overall agreement rates were 86.0% , 96.3%, and 94.3%, respectively. There were 53 discrepant cases, of which 25 were ALK FISH–positive/ALK IHC–negative and 28 were ALK FISH–negative/ALK IHC–positive. The hazard ratios using observed outcomes were 0.401 for ALK FISH–positive/ALK IHC–positive cases and 0.407 for all ALK FISH–positive cases tested with ALK IHC versus 0.454 for all ALK FISH–positive cases enrolled in the trial. Outcome data for ALK FISH–negative/ALK IHC–positive cases were not available for analysis. Between-reader agreement rates for ALK IHC involving three independent laboratories exceeded 98%.ConclusionsThe ALK (D5F3) CDx assay is a stand-alone companion diagnostic test for identification of patients for treatment with crizotinib. This automated assay provides an effective option to accurately and rapidly identify patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. The simple binary scoring algorithm results in high reader-to-reader precision.     

Evaluation of a Dual ALK/ROS1 Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Test in Non–Small-cell Lung Cancer

Background

Several therapeutics targets have emerged to treat patients with non–small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), with numerous biomarkers available to test for treatment choices. Minimum tumor wastage is necessary to permit the analysis of every potentially relevant target. Searching for targetable ALK and ROS1 rearrangements is now mandatory in NSCLC. In the present study, we evaluated the performance of a dual ALK/ROS1 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probe that concurrently analyzed the 2 oncogenes on a same FISH slide.

Usefulness of immunohistochemistry for the detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in Japanese lung adenocarcinoma

Purpose

Mutations in components of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade may be a new candidate for target for lung cancer. The usefulness of immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a new approach for the detection of BRAF V600E in cancer patients has been recently reported.

Methods

To increase the sensitivity, we modified BRAF V600E expression detection assay by IHC using mutation specific antibody. From the screening step, we found a novel 599 insertion T BRAF mutation in lung adenocarcinoma. In this study included 26 surgically removed cases with EGFR, Kras, erbB2, EML4-ALK and KIF5B-RET wild-type (wt) lung adenocarcinomas, including 7 BRAF mutants (5 V600E, 1 N581I, and 1 novel 599 insertion T mutation) analyzed by DNA sequencing. Detection of the BRAF V600E mutation was carried out by the Dako EnVision™ FLEX detection system using the VE1 clone antibody and compared with the results of direct sequencing.

Results

The autostainer IHC VE1 assay was positive in 5 of 5 (100%) BRAF V600E-mutated tumors and negative in 20 of 21 (95.2%) BRAF non-V600E tumors, except for a novel 599 insertion T case.

Conclusion

IHC using the VE1 clone and FLEX linker is a specific method for the detection BRAF V600E and may be an alternative to molecular biology for the detection of mutations in lung adenocarcinomas. This method might be useful for screening to use molecular target therapy for lung adenocarcinomas.     

Clinical and prognostic implications of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in never-smokers with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic significance of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearrangement in never-smokers with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 162 consecutive never-smokers who underwent curative resection for stage IB to IIIA lung adenocarcinoma at a single institution. We concurrently analyzed mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) genes, and investigated ALK rearrangements by fluorescence in situ hybridization assay. ROS1 rearrangement was also determined in all triple (EGFR/KRAS/ALK)-negative tumors.

Results

Of 162 never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma, 14 (8.6%) and 5 (3.1%) had ALK and ROS1 rearrangements, respectively. Nineteen of the 74 (25.7%) EGFR and KRAS mutation-negative patients were fusion-positive (ALK or ROS1 fusion). Fusion-positive patients tended to have shorter median disease-free survival (DFS) than fusion-negative patients (28.0 vs. 33.9 months; p = 0.128). In multivariate analysis, fusion-positive patients had significantly poorer DFS than fusion-negative patients after adjustment for age, sex, T stage, N stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy use (p = 0.022; hazard ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.19–4.30). The first recurrence sites were not significantly different between fusion-positive and fusion-negative patients in this study.

Conclusion

This study shows significantly poorer DFS of ALK or ROS1 fusion-positive lung adenocarcinoma in never-smokers after curative surgery.     

Detection of novel and potentially actionable anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement in colorectal adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemistry screening

Purpose

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement has been detected in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) using advanced molecular diagnostics tests including exon scanning, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and next generation sequencing (NGS). We investigated if immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used to detect ALK rearrangement in gastrointestinal malignancies.

Experimental designs

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) from consecutive gastric carcinoma (GC) and CRC patients who underwent surgical resection at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea were screened by IHC using ALK monoclonal antibody 5A4. IHC positive cases were confirmed by FISH, nCounter assays, and NGS-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). ALK IHC was further applied to CRC patients enrolled in a pathway-directed therapeutic trial.

Results

Four hundred thirty-two GC and 172 CRC cases were screened by IHC. No GC sample was ALK IHC positive. One CRC (0.6%) was ALK IHC positive (3+) that was confirmed by ALK FISH and a novel CAD-ALK (C35; A20) fusion variant that resulted from a paracentric inversion event inv(2)(p22–21p23) was identified by CGP. One out of 50 CRC patients enrolled in a pathway-directed therapeutic trial was ALK IHC positive (3+) confirmed by ALK FISH and found to harbor the EML4-ALK (E21, A20) fusion variant by CGP. Growth of a tumor cell line derived from this EML4-ALK CRC patient was inhibited by ALK inhibitors crizotinib and entrectinib.

Conclusions

ALK IHC is a viable screening strategy for identifying ALK rearrangement in CRC. ALK rearrangement is a potential actionable driver mutation in CRC based on survival inhibition of patient tumor-derived cell line by potent ALK inhibitors.     

High rate of FGFR1 amplifications in brain metastases of squamous and non-squamous lung cancer

Objectives

FGFR1 amplifications are common in squamous cell carcinoma and rare in adenocarcinoma of the lung, but have not been investigated in brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and methods

We performed fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for FGFR1 and immunohistochemistry for pAKT, PI3K, HIF1a and Ki67 in 175 NSCLC brain metastases and 11 matched primary tumors. ALK gene rearrangement status was available from a previous study. We performed statistical correlations of clinical, histopathological and molecular data.

Results

FGFR1 amplifications were found in a total of 30/175 (17%) brain metastases: 4/21 (19%) squamous cell carcinomas, 20/130 (15.3%) adenocarcinomas, 2/12 (16.6%) adenosquamous carcinomas, 4/9 (44.4%) large cell carcinomas and 0/3 neuroendocrine large cell carcinoma. FGFR1 gene status was identical between primary tumors and brain metastases in 9/11 evaluable cases. In 2/11 cases (1 adenosquamous and 1 large cell carcinoma), FGFR1 amplifications were present only in the brain metastasis and not in the primary tumor. Furthermore, we found a significant positive correlation of ALK and FGFR1 gene amplification status in brain metastases (p < 0.001, Chi square test). Patients with high-level FGFR1 amplifications had significantly higher number of visceral metastases (p < 0.001, Chi square test).

Conclusion

Our findings argue for an enrichment of FGFR1 amplifications in brain metastases of adenocarcinomas (where they were 5-fold more frequent than reported for primary tumors) and possibly also of other non-squamous carcinomas, but not in squamous cell carcinomas of the lung. These results may be relevant for targeted therapy and prophylaxis of NSCLC brain metastases.     

Combinational Analysis of FISH and Immunohistochemistry Reveals Rare Genomic Events in ALK Fusion Patterns in NSCLC that Responds to Crizotinib Treatment

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to explore the complicated rearrangement mechanisms underlying cases with atypical and negative anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) fluorescence hybridization (FISH) and positive immunohistochemistry (IHC) results and to stress the importance of combinational assay of these two methods in current pathological diagnosis.MethodsA total of 3128 NSCLCs were screened for ALK fusions through both FISH analysis and IHC assays with Ventana-D5F3 antibody. Fourteen cases with atypical and negative FISH results with the current criteria and positive IHC results were analyzed with targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS).ResultsOf the 3128 cases tested, 228 (7.3%) and 214 (6.8%) were ALK positive by IHC and FISH, respectively. Fourteen cases with negative and atypical FISH results all demonstrated IHC positivity. Of 2991 cases, eight (0.27%) with negative FISH results demonstrated echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 4 gene (EML4)-ALK fusions revealed by targeted NGS, and the relative abundance of fusion ranged from 0.9% to 46.8%. Three of 2991 cases (0.1%) did not exhibit any type of ALK fusions. In addition, two patients showed an isolated 5′ side signal and targeted NGS revealed two novel ALK partner genes, baculoviral IAP repeat containing 6 gene (BIRC6) and phosphatidylinositol binding clathrin assembly protein gene (PICALM). One patient showed an isolated and attenuated 3′ red signal and demonstrated a novel translocation partner with CCAAT/enhancer binding protein zeta gene (CEBPZ). Of all the patients, four received crizotinib treatment and demonstrated partial responses at the end of follow-up.ConclusionsOur study showed that patients with negative and atypical ALK FISH patterns may have positive results for IHC testing and harbor the translocation partners of EML4 or other genes. Therefore, additional testing with NGS should be conducted to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the complicated gene rearrangement events.     

Next-Generation Sequencing and Immunohistochemistry as Future Gold Standard of ALK Testing in Lung Cancer?

A recent study examined the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the detection of EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer. This letter suggests that although NGS offers an opportunity to obtain additional data concerning the molecular mechanisms of cancer and to target oncogenic pathways, it should be considered a supplementary test associated with FISH and IHC combined ALK testing rather than as the new gold standard method.We read with much interest the study by Pekar-Zlotin et al. [1] concerning the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the detection of EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer. We would like to comment on some issues.First, this study of 51 patients reported a high percentage of ALK-positive/rearranged tumors with a global rate upgraded from 7.8% with FISH alone to 13.7% with the combination of FISH, IHC, and NGS. No multistep oncogenic screening algorithm (i.e., ALK testing in only KRAS and EGFR wild-type tumors for example) leading to a higher ALK rearrangement frequency among the tested samples was reported in the methods. Furthermore, the KRAS and EGFR mutational status of these tumors was not mentioned. This frequency of 13.7% is surprisingly far superior to the 2%–7% reported in lung cancer and, although the authors assume that their cohort may not be representative of their lung cancer population, it remains impressively high [2, 3]. Second, many studies have pointed out a valuable substitution of ALK FISH testing by ALK IHC testing in lung cancer, although some other studies noted discrepancies not only between FISH and IHC but also in the clinical response to crizotinib in both FISH⁺IHC⁻ and FISH⁻IHC⁺ tumors [4, 5].Clinical response to crizotinib therapy was reported in only two of the five discordant cases, that is, in an IHC⁺FISH⁻NGS⁺ patient and in an IHC⁺FISH⁻NGS⁻ patient, without data concerning a third patient who was FISH⁺IHC⁻NGS⁻ [1]. In fact, replacing FISH with IHC would lead to misdiagnosis and inappropriate therapeutic strategy in FISH⁺IHC⁻ patients. Furthermore, the percentages of FISH ALK-rearranged cells were not mentioned, raising questions about true ALK-negative FISH tumors versus ALK FISH borderline tumors (i.e., with a percentage of rearranged cells around the cutoff of 15%).The authors considered NGS the gold standard in ALK testing instead of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved FISH test and reported a high rate of false negativity with FISH. Nevertheless, when looking at the few available data concerning the clinical response of FISH⁻NGS⁺ ALK patients to crizotinib, the superiority of NGS compared with FISH is not evident. Pekar-Zlotin et al. [1] reported a IHC⁺FISH⁻NGS⁻ patient with partial clinical response to crizotinib. Two FISH⁻NGS⁺ ALK patients with no response to crizotinib were reported by Ali et al. [6]. These cases are examples of actual limitations to consider NGS as a new gold standard in ALK testing.To conclude, we agree that NGS offers a great opportunity to obtain additional data concerning the molecular mechanisms of cancer and to target oncogenic pathways in lung cancer. Nevertheless, we think that it should be considered more as a supplementary test associated with FISH and IHC combined ALK testing rather than as the new gold standard method. Faced with technique drawbacks and challenging biopsy samples, this combination of the three methods appears a more effective screening tool in an intent-to-treat strategy.     

Evaluation of <Emphasis Type="Italic">ALK</Emphasis> gene rearrangement in central nervous system metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer using two-step RT-PCR technique

Purpose

RT-PCR technique has showed a promising value as pre-screening method for detection of mRNA containing abnormal ALK sequences, but its sensitivity and specificity is still discussable. Previously, we determined the incidence of ALK rearrangement in CNS metastases of NSCLC using IHC and FISH methods.

Materials

We evaluated ALK gene rearrangement using two-step RT-PCR method with EML4-ALK Fusion Gene Detection Kit (Entrogen, USA). The studied group included 145 patients (45 females, 100 males) with CNS metastases of NSCLC and was heterogeneous in terms of histology and smoking status.

Results

21% of CNS metastases of NSCLC (30/145) showed presence of mRNA containing abnormal ALK sequences. FISH and IHC tests confirmed the presence of ALK gene rearrangement and expression of ALK abnormal protein in seven patients with positive result of RT-PCR analysis (4.8% of all patients, 20% of RT-PCR positive patients). RT-PCR method compared to FISH analysis achieved 100% of sensitivity and only 82.7% of specificity. IHC method compared to FISH method indicated 100% of sensitivity and 97.8% of specificity. In comparison to IHC, RT-PCR showed identical sensitivity with high number of false positive results.

Conclusion

Utility of RT-PCR technique in screening of ALK abnormalities and in qualification patients for molecularly targeted therapies needs further validation.

     

Novel EGFR mutation-specific antibodies for lung adenocarcinoma: Highly specific but not sensitive detection of an E746_A750 deletion in exon 19 and an L858R mutation in exon 21 by immunohistochemistry

Objectives

Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase domain are correlated with dramatic clinical responses in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The two most common EGFR mutations, representing 85–90% of EGFR mutations, are the E746_A750 deletion in exon 19 and the L858R point mutation in exon 21. We conducted this study to evaluate the suitability of mutation-specific antibodies that can detect E746_A750 deletion and L858R mutant EGFR proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Materials and methods

In a cohort of consecutive patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas (n = 240), mutant EGFR protein expression was assessed by IHC using specific antibodies (clone SP111 and SP125) to the 2 major forms of EGFR mutations. Immunoreactivity was scored as 0–3, and the results were compared with the EGFR-mutational status.

Results

With a cutoff value of IHC 2+ for SP 111 (anti-EGFR E746_A750 del antibody) and SP 125 (anti-EGFR L858R antibody), both antibodies showed high specificity (99.0% and 89.7%, respectively) and sensitivity (70.6% and 80.4%, respectively). While cases with IHC scores of 3 using these 2 antibodies positively correlated with the EGFR-mutational status, cases with IHC scores lower than 3+ showed variable results regarding EGFR-mutational status.

Conclusion

Although each antibody showed relatively high specificity, some EGFR-mutant cases were not detected by the mutation-specific antibodies. Various forms of exon 19 deletions, except E746_A750, were rarely detected by the mutant-specific antibody. Therefore, IHC-negative cases require further molecular analysis to confirm the presence of EGFR mutations.     

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization,Immunohistochemistry, and Next‐Generation Sequencing for Detection of EML4‐ALK Rearrangement in Lung Cancer

Background.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved method for detecting EML4-ALK rearrangement is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); however, data supporting the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for that purpose are accumulating. Previous studies that compared FISH and IHC considered FISH the gold standard, but none compared data with the results of next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis.

Materials and Methods.

We studied FISH and IHC (D5F3 antibody) systematically for EML4-ALK rearrangement in 51 lung adenocarcinoma patients, followed by NGS in case of discordance.

Results.

Of 51 patients, 4 were positive with FISH (7.8%), and 8 were positive with IHC (15.7%). Three were positive with both. NGS confirmed that four of the five patients who were positive with IHC and negative with FISH were positive for ALK. Two were treated by crizotinib, with progression-free survival of 18 and 6 months. Considering NGS as the most accurate test, the sensitivity and specificity were 42.9% and 97.7%, respectively, for FISH and 100% and 97.7%, respectively, for IHC.

Conclusion.

The FISH-based method of detecting EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer may miss a significant number of patients who could benefit from targeted ALK therapy. Screening for EML4-ALK rearrangement by IHC should be strongly considered, and NGS is recommended in borderline cases. Two patients who were negative with FISH and positive with IHC were treated with crizotinib and responded to therapy.