Quality of life and toxicity in breast cancer patients using adjuvant TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide), in comparison with FAC (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil)

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare two regimens of chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer, including FAC (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil) and TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide); and analyze the toxicity of these treatments and observe patient??s health-related quality of life.

Methods

Health-related quality of life was assessed for up to 4?months (from the beginning to the end of chemotherapy cycles), using European organization and cancer treatment quality of life questionnaire (EORTC) QLQ-C30. A group of 100 patients, with node-positive breast cancer were studied in order to compare the toxicity of adjuvant therapy TAC with FAC and the subsequent effects on the patient??s quality of life.

Results

After a 4-month follow-up of patients, our findings showed that despite having the same mean score of QOL at the start of adjuvant chemotherapy, the QOL in TAC arm was decreased more as a result of the higher range of toxicity in TAC regimen.

Conclusion

In spite of increase in disease-free patients who received TAC regimen and increase their survival rate, there is significant toxicity and decrease in QOL in TAC protocol compare to FAC protocol. Using prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) along with increased education aimed at improving patient??s knowledge and also the provision of a supportive group involving psychiatrics and patients that have successfully experienced the same treatment may be helpful.     

A phase I trial of a 3-day topotecan Q 21 days for recurrent epithelial cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum

OBJECTIVE: This trial was undertaken to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan that can be administered for 3 days q 21 days. A 3-day schedule is more convenient and less expensive than standard 5-day dosing. METHODS: Patients with recurrent epithelial ovary, tubal, or peritoneal carcinoma were treated with escalating doses of topotecan beginning at 2.50 mg/m(2) as an outpatient days 1-3 q 21 days. Colony stimulating factors were not employed prophylactically, but could be added for grade 4 marrow toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty patients with a median age of 61 (range 46-80) and performance status of 0 or 1 were entered. All patients had received at least one prior paclitaxel/platinum regimen; 6 had received two. Ninety-one cycles were delivered (median = 6) and 98.9% were on schedule. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 17 of 20 patients (85%) in cycle 1 and in 38 of 91 (41.8%) total cycles. Sixteen of 20 patients (80%) started G-CSF on cycle 2. Two of 91 (2.2%) cycles had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Four cycles (4.4%) were associated with febrile neutropenia. Two patients experienced grade 4 neurotoxicity (DLT) at 4.25 mg/m(2). Other nonhematologic toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan can be safely administered on schedule as an outpatient days 1-3 q 21 days. Neurotoxicity was the DLT when G-CSF was added; the MTD was 3.75 mg/m(2). There was minimal other nonhematologic toxicity. Neutropenia was predictable and easily managed with G-CSF. Febrile neutropenia was uncommon and thrombocytopenia was rare at the doses evaluated.     

Phase I trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide with granulocyte colony stimulating factor as first-line therapy for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES:The goal of this study was to determine the maximally tolerated doses (MTDs) of carboplatin, paclitaxel (Taxol), etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (CTEC) with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, Filgrastim) support as first-line chemotherapy in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients with either stage IV EOC, or stage III EOC and any amount of gross residual tumor after surgical debulking were eligible to receive six cycles of CTEC over five different dose levels in this phase I trial (planned 21-day cycle length). Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cyclophosphamide were administered intravenously on Day 1, and oral etoposide was administered on Days 1, 2, and 3. G-CSF was administered beginning Day 4. RESULTS: Twenty patients received a total of 98 cycles of CTEC over the five dose levels evaluated. Bone marrow suppression was the major toxic effect, with grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia being observed in 25 and 23% of cycles, respectively. The overall incidence of febrile neutropenia was 10%, and no toxic deaths occurred. No grade IV thrombocytopenia or febrile neutropenia was observed once the carboplatin dose was reduced from AUC of 7 to 5. Nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild (grade 2 or less). Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed at the highest dose level evaluated in this study, preventing assignment of the MTD. The clinical complete response rate was 92%, although 15 of 16 evaluable patients have progressed with a median progression-free interval of 4 months (range, 2-11 months). One patient remains disease-free 9 months from the completion of CTEC. CONCLUSIONS: The CTEC regimen is well tolerated and highly active. Although the MTD was not reached in this study, the short median progression-free interval suggests that this regimen is unlikely to be superior to standard treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Strategies to optimize the development of future combination chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer are discussed.     

Phase II study of topotecan and paclitaxel for recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: This trial investigated the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel and topotecan combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced cervical cancer (ACC). METHODS: Patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic ACC and an ECOG performance status < or =2 were treated with 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel on Day 1 and 1 mg/m(2) topotecan on Days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle with G-CSF support and the standard pretreatment regimen for paclitaxel. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled, and 86 cycles of therapy (median, 5; range, 1-14) were administered. Grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (47%), leukopenia (27%), neurotoxicity (13%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and diarrhea (13%). Among 13 evaluable patients, 7 (54%) responded (1 complete and 6 partial; 95% confidence interval = 29.2%, 76.8%). Three (23%) patients experienced stable disease. Progression-free and overall survival were 3.77 and 8.62 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel/topotecan was generally well tolerated and active in the relapsed, recurrent, or metastatic ACC setting, with response rates comparable with those of other current ACC systemic therapies.     

Phase 2 trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and irinotecan in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers

OBJECTIVE: Our goal in this nonrandomized phase 2 trial was to evaluate the toxicity and obtain preliminary data on the potential efficacy of a novel three-drug combination regimen (carboplatin-paclitaxel-irinotecan) when employed as initial therapy of advanced ovarian cancer or as second-line treatment in the setting of a prolonged (>or=12 months) treatment-free interval. METHODS: Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer, primary adenocarcinoma of the peritoneum, or fallopian tube cancer were enrolled in the study. Patients received carboplatin (AUC 5), paclitaxel (150 mg/m(2) over 3 h), and irinotecan (100 mg/m(2) over 90 min). The three-drug combination was initially administered on an every 21-day schedule, but due to toxicity was subsequently changed to a 28-day program. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled into this phase 2 trial. Twenty-three patients were chemotherapy naive, while 7 had received prior chemotherapy. Seventeen patients completed all six cycles of treatment. Eight patients (27%) were removed from the study after a median of three cycles due to toxicities. Seventeen patients (57%) experienced grade 4 neutropenia, with three individuals requiring hospitalization for neutropenic fever and dehydration. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia were experienced by three patients each. The principal nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea (grade 3: three patients) and fatigue. The overall objective clinical response rate was 83%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin-paclitaxel-irinotecan can be administered to women with advanced ovarian cancer with significant, but overall acceptable toxicity. Modification of the regimen from a 3-week to a 4-week schedule permits a greater percentage of patients to complete the program without experiencing excessive toxicity. The overall objective response rate observed in this trial is comparable to other combination regimens employed in this setting. Defining a place for this three-drug program in the standard management of ovarian cancer will require the conduct of an appropriately designed randomized trial.     

Concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage squamous carcinoma of the vulva

A phase II trial of concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CT + RT) was conducted for the primary treatment of 12 patients with retrospective surgical FIGO stages III-IV squamous carcinoma of the vulva. Eight patients were stage III and four were stage IV. Chemotherapy was used as a radiation sensitizer and it was administered in two 5-day cycles 28 days apart. Cisplatin, 50 mg/m2/day iv on Days 1 and 2 or 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 or 2, plus continuous-infusion 5-FU, 1000 mg/m2/day for 4-5 days commencing on Days 1 and 28 of external-beam radiation therapy, are given. The pelvic radiation to a dose of 4400-5400 cGy is administered AP and PA to treat the primary tumor, the groin nodes, and the iliac vessels to the level below the common iliac nodes. Complete tumor responses were seen in 8 of 12 (67%) patients. Responses were observed in 6 of 8 (75%) stage III patients and 2 of 4 (50%) stage IV patients. Partial response were observed in 3 patients, and 1 patient had persistent disease. At the completion of concurrent chemoradiation therapy, radical vulvectomy or excision was used in 3 patients and posterior exenteration in 1. With a median follow-up of 37 months (range, 7-60 months), 10 patients are alive and free of disease, and 2 patients died at 12 and 15 months. There were no treatment-related deaths and no grade 4 toxicity. The morbidity included moist desquamation of the vulva in all patients, with grade 2 toxicity in 10 and grade 3 in 2. One patient had a deep venous thrombosis that responded to anticoagulation therapy. These data support the use of concurrent cisplatin and 5-FU chemotherapy and radiation therapy as an alternative to primary radical surgery to treat advanced-stage squamous carcinoma of the vulva.     

The effect of prolonged cisplatin-based chemotherapy on progression-free survival in patients with optimal epithelial ovarian cancer: "maintenance" therapy reconsidered.

From 1978 until 1988, 116 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were entered onto one of three consecutive prospective clinical trials involving cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. They had the following characteristics: (1) stage III or IV disease, (2) grade 2 or 3 tumors, and (3) optimally debulked tumors (residual disease < or = 2 cm). The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of duration of chemotherapy on survival. The treatment plans were as follows: Trial 1, 12 cycles of cisplatin/melphalan (43 patients); Trial 2, 12 cycles of cisplatin/cyclophosphamide (24 patients); and Trial 3, 6 cycles of cisplatin/cyclophosphamide (49 patients). The total dose of cisplatin was 60 mg/m2 in the first trial and 50 mg/m2 in the second and third trials. Median survival times for the three groups were 58, 29, and 35 months, respectively (NS). Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were 37, 23, and 15 months, respectively (P = 0.0008). Combining patients from the first two trials, the median PFS for patients receiving 12 planned cycles of chemotherapy was 30 months versus 15 months for patients receiving 6 planned cycles (P = 0.0004). Using a forward stepwise Cox proportional hazard model, the use of 12 cycles of therapy and melphalan predicted increased PFS (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively). In view of these results, the lack of published data supporting the superiority of 6 over 12 cycles of chemotherapy, and the rather recent availability of less toxic maintenance therapy (i.e., carboplatin), we believe that a multiinstitutional trial comparing the 6-cycle regimen with more prolonged chemotherapy is justifiable.     

Dose- intensified, preoperative and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T3- and T4- breast cancer: toxicity, clinical and pathological remission

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate a dose-intensified, preoperative chemotherapy with 3 cycles (cy) of epirubicin 60 mg/m2, ifosfamide 5 g/m2 with mesna 5 g/m2, biweekly with G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg (filgrastim), in terms of toxicity, clinical and pathological remission rates and changes of immunohistochemical characteristics (ER, PR, c-erbB2, p53) during chemotherapy of inoperable patients (pt) with poor prognosis (locally advanced (LABC, 9 pt), inflammatory breast cancer (IBC, 12 pt) and M0. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following preoperative chemotherapy (63 cy) and mastectomy patients received adjuvant 3 cy of epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (biweekly) with G-CSF (54 cy), and subsequently radiation of the thoracic wall and tamoxifen 20 mg/day. RESULTS: Primary toxicity (T): grade 3 alopecia (21 pt), grade 3-4 leucopenia (7 cy), grade 1-2 leucopenia (26 cy), grade 1-2 anemia (61 cy), grade 1-2 neurocortical T (13 cy), grade 1-2 neurosensory T (7 cy), grade 1 cardiac toxicity (1 pt). ORR: 65% (CR: 0 pt, PR: 13 pt, NC: 8 pt). The grades of histological regression were: 0: 14 pt, 1: 6 pt, 2: 0 pt, 3: 1 pt. No significant correlation was observed between the clinical response and the histological regression (Fischer's exact test). The immunohistochemical expression of tumor characteristics did not change significantly during preoperative chemotherapy (Wilcoxon test). 81% of the pt were disease-free after a median follow-up of 20 months (7-26). CONCLUSION: This therapy is safe, feasible and effective, both as primary and adjuvant chemotherapy in women with LABC and IBC.     

Experience with single-agent paclitaxel consolidation following primary chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Twelve cycles of single-agent paclitaxel have been demonstrated to prolong progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer whom achieved a clinical complete response to a primary platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy regimen. This trial was conducted to compare the toxicity and disease-free interval of 3 cycles vs. 12 cycles of paclitaxel consolidation in patients treated with an intensive three-drug front-line regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine. METHODS: Following cytoreductive surgery, 26 ovarian cancer patients received primary chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC = 5, day 1), paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h, day 1), and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2), day 1 day 8), with treatment repeated every 21 days x 6 cycles. The first 13 patients (group A) received three additional cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days). The second set of 13 patients (group B) also received three cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) and then received nine additional cycles of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) consolidation therapy. The change from 3 cycles to 12 cycles of consolidation therapy for group B was made following the published results of GOG 178. RESULTS: In group A, all 13 patients completed three courses of consolidation therapy. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and two patients exhibited both grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 3 patients (23%). In group B, 9 of the 13 patients whom were intended to receive 12 total cycles of paclitaxel consolidation were able to complete the program. There was no grade 3-4 neutropenia or anemia in this population, although 1 patient developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 7 patients (54%). Although not a randomized experience, median progression-free interval was 76 weeks for group B, and 47 weeks for group A. CONCLUSION: Single-agent paclitaxel consolidation therapy can be administered for 12 cycles following first-line carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine induction therapy, but there is considerable risk for development of a moderately severe peripheral neuropathy.     

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin in uterine cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES: The toxicity and effectivity of intravenous paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assessed in cervical cancer patients.Patients and methods. Forty-three consecutive patients affected by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2 to IIB were treated with paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) that was administered intravenously over a 3-h period, followed by cisplatin 60 mg/m(2), also administered intravenously. The chemotherapy was administered every 10 days and for three courses. The toxicity of the regimen in each cycle was determined according to the WHO toxicity criteria and in cases with grade 3 or 4 toxicity, chemotherapy was postponed until the toxicity was disappeared. Before the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the lesion was pathologically confirmed by punch biopsy, and the size of the tumor mass was measured by pelvic examination and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The response to the treatment was determined 10 days after three cycles of chemotherapy by pelvic examination and pelvic MRI. Two weeks after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy was completed, the patients were either given an operation or radiation therapy, depending on their overall condition, the operational risks, and personal willingness for an operation. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were enrolled in this study and all of them were given an operation. Hematologic toxicity was seen in 17 patients. But most of them were anemia and there was no grade 3 or 4. Grade 1 neurotoxicities developed in 29 patients and all of them were peripheral neurotoxicity. Clinical responses occurred in 90.7% (39/43) of patients, including 39.5% (17/43) with a complete response (CR), 11.6% (5/43) with a pathologically determined complete response, 51.2% (22/43) with a partial response (PR), and 9.3% (4/43) showed stable disease (ST). A down-staging response was seen in 72.1% (31/43) of those patients showing a response. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin for use in neoadjuvnant chemotherapy seems to be tolerated and very active in cervical cancer. Especially, every 10 days treatment did not delay the optimal time of main treatment. A larger number of cases need to be studied to confirm the efficacy of the treatment.     

A phase II clinical trial of topotecan and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

A phase II clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topotecan and carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer was the objective of this study. Patients had histologically confirmed ovarian epithelial cancer with at least one measurable lesion. Patients received topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 3 every 21 days for six cycles. All 42 patients enrolled were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median number of cycles delivered was six. Overall response rate was 71%, with 19 clinical complete responses (45%) and 11 clinical partial responses (26%). Median survival time was 47 months and 5-year survival was 42%. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 100% of patients. However, this toxicity was transient and easily manageable; no patients experienced febrile neutropenia. The combination of topotecan and carboplatin is active in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Delay of therapy by 1 week or topotecan dose reduction to 1.25 mg/m(2) is the first-choice option to reduce topotecan toxicity without affecting the efficacy. Moreover, a chemotherapy regimen using weekly topotecan, which is currently being tested, should be considered.     

Phase I study of alternating doublets of topotecan/carboplatin and paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate topotecan with carboplatin in an alternating doublet with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer were studied. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (cycles 1, 3, 5, 7) in an alternating doublet regimen was determined through standard dose escalation in cohorts of three; doses of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 4 to 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), cycles 2, 4, 6, 8) were fixed. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined only for cycle 1 as febrile neutropenia, prolonged grade 4 granulocytopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, > or =grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, or failure to recover in < or =7 days. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was also studied. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 142 cycles of topotecan/carboplatin. Hematologic DLTs included grade 4 neutropenia (59 events, 42% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia (32 events, 23% of cycles). Granulocytopenia was generally short-lived, and only 2 cases of febrile neutropenia occurred. The MTD was 1.0 mg/m(2)/day topotecan and carboplatin AUC 4, alternating with 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and carboplatin AUC 4. Although G-CSF effectively managed myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia developed in later cycles, limiting further topotecan dose escalation. The median progression-free survival was 20.5 months, and elevated pretreatment CA-125 levels normalized in 29 of 34 (85%) patients. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a reasonably well-tolerated alternating doublet regimen, coupled with evidence of antitumor activity, provides the basis for further investigation of topotecan in first-line therapy of ovarian cancer. Topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 3 days) was chosen for further evaluation in a phase II study.     

Concurrent carboplatin with pelvic radiation therapy in the primary treatment of cervix cancer

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine the acute toxicities of concurrent carboplatin and radiation therapy in the primary treatment of cervix cancer and to ascertain the antitumor activity of this regimen. METHODS: Patients with stage IB-1 to IVA untreated primary cervix cancers were eligible for enrollment into this study. Carboplatin was administered on a weekly basis with external radiation therapy (ERT). Low-dose brachytherapy was given after completion of ERT. Acute toxicities and response to treatment were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-one evaluable patients were enrolled. The majority of patients had early stage disease. Carboplatin was successfully administered in 175 out of 186 (94%) planned treatments. All patients completed the prescribed course of radiation therapy. The mean treatment time was 50 days (36-73). There were no treatment delays for neutropenia or gastrointestinal toxicity. No patient was hospitalized for treatment related toxicities. Gastrointestinal toxicity equivalent to grade 3 or 4 was not reported. The objective tumor response based on physical exam findings and computed tomography measurements was 90%. CONCLUSION: Patients with cervix cancer can be treated on schedule with concurrent carboplatin and pelvic radiation therapy. This regimen is well tolerated and produces excellent response rates.     

Phase I trial of paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and carboplatin (TAC) for the treatment of endometrial cancer

Doxorubicin, platinum compounds, and taxanes represent the chemotherapeutic agents with the greatest activity in endometrial cancer. We conducted an optimal-dose determination of combination chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel (TXL), doxorubicin, and carboplatin (CBDCA) (TAC) in patients with endometrial cancer. Patients with epithelial endometrial cancer requiring adjuvant therapy were enrolled between June 2003 and March 2005. No patients had received prior radiotherapy, and only two patients had previously undergone chemotherapy. Doxorubicin was infused on day 1, and TXL followed by CBDCA was administered on day 2. The starting dose was doxorubicin 35 mg/m(2), TXL 120 mg/m(2), and CBDCA area under the curve (AUC). The dose of each agent was gradually escalated. Patients were scheduled to receive at least four cycles of therapy. If patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia or neutropenic fever with grade 3 neutropenia, they were permitted to be administered granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after the second course. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. Although four patients out of 27 experienced dose-limiting toxicities, a maximum tolerated dose was not established at the final dose level. Five patients (three for recurrent and two for advanced) had measurable lesions. There were four responders (three for partial response and one for complete response) in our series. The recommended dose of TAC therapy for endometrial cancer was doxorubicin 45 mg/m(2) for day 1, TXL 150 mg/m(2) and CBDCA AUC 5 for day 2.     

Triplet combination of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in previously treated, relapsed ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: an experience in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (GCP) combination as salvage therapy in patients with relapsed ovarian or peritoneal cancer who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered at 800 mg/m(2) as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8; carboplatin (AUC of 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) were administered as 60-min and 3-h intravenous infusions, respectively, on day 1. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of nine cycles. RESULTS: Twenty patients (ovarian carcinoma, 19; peritoneal carcinoma, 1) received this triplet regimen as salvage therapy. All the patients had previously received at least one platinum-based regimen for chemotherapy and 17 of them had received platinum plus paclitaxel. The median number of previous regimens was 2 (range, 1-4), and the median platinum-free interval was 9 months (range, 1-18). A total of 130 cycles were administered with a median of six cycles per patient (range, 3-9). The overall response rate was 75%, including 12 complete responses (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36.1-80.9) and three partial responses (15%; 95% CI, 3.2-37.9). The other five patients showed stable disease (25%; 95% CI, 8.7-49.1). The median duration of the progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range, 3-20). Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with leukopenia being the most prominent (grade 3/4 toxicity in 35% patients), followed by thrombocytopenia in 20% patients. In addition, 35% patients had grade 3 anemia. All the toxicities were manageable and the patients recovered fully. Among non-hematological toxicities, the only notable one was grades 2 and 3 hepatic toxicity seen in two and one patients, respectively, necessitating a decrease in the paclitaxel dose in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: GCP combination is an effective salvage chemotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated and relapsed ovarian and peritoneal cancer. The significant side effects of myelosuppression and hepatic toxicity were of moderate severity and manageable.     

Radiation therapy with concomitant paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma limited to the pelvis: a phase I/II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

OBJECTIVES: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy concurrent with whole pelvic irradiation in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: Consenting patients with stage IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIB and IVA carcinoma of the cervix (all cell types) were eligible for this phase I/II trial. Chemotherapy agents were administered in escalating doses to cohorts of three patients at each dose level, pending evaluation of toxicities from the previous dose level. RESULTS: Thirty-five eligible women were enrolled on this study, of whom 13 comprised the phase I component. The MTD was determined to be cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 administered weekly for six cycles with external beam radiation therapy. An additional 21 patients were enrolled in the phase II component at the previously determined MTD, yielding a total of 22 patients at the MTD, of whom 19 were evaluable. Among the evaluable patients treated at the MTD, two had grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities (representing 5 of 113 cycles administered to this cohort) and seven experienced grade 3 or 4 neutrophil toxicity, none occurring prior to the fourth cycle. Thrombocytopenia was rare. Radiation therapy was successfully completed in 52% of patients at 8 weeks and in 79% of patients at 9 weeks, with a median of 59 days. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy concurrent with whole pelvic irradiation can be safely administered at the described MTD.     

A phase I study of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES: To determine toxicity and establish a maximum tolerated dose of outpatient therapy with ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in women with advanced and recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients had stage IVB, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer that was not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiation therapy. A dose escalation through four dose levels was planned. Dose limiting toxicities were defined as grade 3 or grade 4 hematologic toxicity persistent to day 1 of the next scheduled cycle, grade 2 or higher central neurologic symptoms related to ifosfamide and grade 3 or grade 4 peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS: Twelve patients, aged 29 to 71, received 64 treatments and were evaluable for toxicity. No patient was withdrawn from the study due to toxicity. Two patients had received prior radiation therapy without chemotherapy, and seven patients had received radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy. No dose limiting toxicity occurred at dose levels 1 or 2. Three dose reductions occurred at dose level 3 due to neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The maximum tolerated dose is ifosfamide 2 g/m(2) over 2 h, paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 1 h, and carboplatin at an AUC of 5 over 45 min. Grade 3 or grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 11 subjects. Two patients required growth factor support. Grade 3 or grade 4 anemia was seen in one patient. Grade 3 or grade 4 neuropathy was seen in one patient. Other grade 3 or grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity included muscle weakness, myalgia, cough, and shortness of breath. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with ifosfamide 2 g/m(2), paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin AUC = 5 appears to be a safe regimen for the outpatient treatment of women with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer and warrants phase II investigation.     

'Moderate-risk' ovarian cancer (stage I, grade 2; stage II, grade 1 or 2) treated with cisplatin chemotherapy (single agent or combination) and pelvi-abdominal irradiation

We placed patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer into four distinct prognostic groups: 'low', 'moderate', 'high' and 'extreme' risk. The 'moderate-risk' group contained all residual negative, stage I and II patients with two exceptions: stage Ia or b, grade 1 cancers and grade 3 cancers. They were treated with primary surgery, usually including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy and omentectomy. Chemotherapy was then given (cisplatin at 100 mg m⁻² every 2 weeks for three cycles) followed by pelvi-abdominal irradiation (2250 cGy in 10 fractions to the pelvis and 2250 cGy in 22 fractions to the whole abdomen including pelvis). An early cohort with ascites or positive washings instead received six cycles of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide at 75 mg m⁻² and 600 mg m⁻² every 4 weeks with the same pelvi-abdominal irradiation sandwiched between cycles 3 and 4. One-hundred and nine patients were treated between November 1983 and December 1989. Median follow-up was 4.7 years (range 0.7–9 years). The 5-year actuarial overall and failure-free survivals were 81% and 76%, respectively. Chronic toxicity, although usually minor, included 15% with peripheral neuropathy or ototoxicity and 23% with chronic abdominal complaints. Our combined-modality results are similar to those obtained by other centers utilizing either pelvi-abdominal irradiation alone or cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone.     

Dose intensified adjuvant chemotherapy in high risk breast carcinoma with 4-9 positive lymph nodes

OBJECTIVE: Taxanes and anthracyclines represent the two most active groups of agents for the treatment of breast cancer. We evaluated this combination in patients with more than 3 positive lymph nodes in an adjuvant, dose-intensive, sequential therapy in comparison with the standard chemotherapy regimen epirubicin/cyclophosphamide in relation to toxicities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 9/96 127 patients with 4-9/over 9 positive lymph nodes have been recruited from 21 participating centers in an ongoing trial. 67 patients were prospectively randomised for first-line chemotherapy to treatment group A (epirubicin 90 mg/m2-paclitaxel 175 mg/m2; 4 cycles bi-weekly, supported by G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg day 5-13 and 3 sequential cycles of CMF 600/40/600 mg/m2 at 2-weeks interval) and 60 patients to treatment group B (epirubicin 90 mg/m2-cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, 4 cycles tri-weekly, and 3 sequential cycles of CMF 600/40/600 mg/m2 at 3-weeks interval). RESULTS: Preliminary safety and toxicity data are evaluable for 679 cycles. Data about response rate and disease-free-survival and overall survival will be delivered later. For the hematological toxicity the main grade 3 and 4 adverse events for A vs. B were: leucopenia 9.8% vs. 8.4%, febrile neutropenia 1.6% vs. 0.8%--anemia (< 5.9 mmol/l), 0.4% vs. 0.2%--thrombopenia 0% vs. 0%. Non-hematological toxicity occurred more frequently in group A (grade 2, 3, 4):--neuropathy 4.4% vs. 0%,--nausea/emesis 27.8% vs. 19.3%,--fatigue 14.6% vs. 3.4% and mucositis 2.8% vs. 0.3%.     

A phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced, persistent, or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the response rate and toxicity of cis-platinum and gemcitabine in advanced, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. METHODS: From July 1997 to January 1999, we conducted a Phase II trial in patients with advanced, persistent, or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. The schedule employed 1250 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 and 50 mg/m(2) of cis-platinum on day 1 in a 21-day cycle. Eligibility criteria were a GOG performance status of 0-2, adequate bone marrow reserve, serum creatinine less than 1.8 mg%, and a lesion which could be measured in two dimensions. None of the patients had received prior chemotherapy other than radiation sensitizers. Standard GOG toxicity and response criteria were used. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled into the trial. Two patients were inevaluable because of inadequate trial of drug. Seventeen patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The median age of the patients was 47 years (range 24-72). The median number of cycles delivered was 5 (range 2-8). The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia and anemia was 2.4 and 1.2%, respectively. Two patients developed a single episode of grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. The overall response rate was 41% (7/17). There was 1 complete response of 14 months duration and 6 partial responses. Among those patients not previously irradiated, the response rate was 57% (4/7). Among the radiated patients, the response rate was 30% (3/10) with all responses occurring in the radiation field. CONCLUSION: This combination of cis-platinum and gemcitabine is a well-tolerated regimen which exhibits high activity in advanced, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell cervical cancer.