A Meta-Analysis of Prehospital Care Times for Trauma

Background. Time to definitive care is a major determinant of trauma patient outcomes yet little is empirically known about prehospital times at the national level. We sought to determine national averages for prehospital times based on a systematic review of published literature. Methods. We performed a systematic literature search for all articles reporting prehospital times for trauma patients transported by helicopter andground ambulance over a 30-year period. Forty-nine articles were included in a final meta-analysis. Activation time, response time, on-scene time, andtransport time were abstracted from these articles. Prehospital times were also divided into urban, suburban, rural, andair transports. Statistical tests were computed using weighted arithmetic means andstandard deviations. Results. The data were drawn from 20 states in all four U.S. Census Regions andrepresent the prehospital experience of 155,179 patients. Average duration in minutes for urban, suburban, andrural ground ambulances for the total prehospital interval were 30.96, 30.97, and43.17; for the response interval were 5.25, 5.21, and7.72; for the on-scene interval were 13.40, 13.39, and14.59; andfor the transport interval were 10.77, 10.86, and17.28. Average helicopter ambulance times were response 23.25, on-scene 20.43, andtransport 29.80 minutes. Conclusions. Despite the emphasis on time in the prehospital andtrauma literature there has been no national effort to empirically define average prehospital time intervals for trauma patients. We provide points of reference for prehospital intervals so that policymakers can compare individual emergency medical systems to national norms.     

Comparison of children receiving emergent sepsis care by mode of arrival

ObjectiveTo determine if differences in patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes exist between children with sepsis who arrive by emergency medical services (EMS) versus their own mode of transport (self-transport).MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) of two large children's hospitals and treated for sepsis from November 2013 to June 2017. Presentation, ED treatment, and outcomes, primarily time to first bolus and first parental antibiotic, were compared between those transported via EMS versus patients who were self-transported.ResultsOf the 1813 children treated in the ED for sepsis, 1452 were self-transported and 361 were transported via EMS. The EMS group were more frequently male, of black race, and publicly insured than the self-transport group. The EMS group was more likely to have a critical triage category, receive initial care in the resuscitation suite (51.9 vs. 22%), have hypotension at ED presentation (14.4 vs. 5.4%), lactate >2.0 mmol/L (60.6 vs. 40.8%), vasoactive agents initiated in the ED (8.9 vs. 4.9%), and to be intubated in the ED (14.4 vs. 2.8%). The median time to first IV fluid bolus was faster in the EMS group (36 vs. 57 min). Using Cox LASSO to adjust for potential covariates, time to fluids remained faster for the EMS group (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.12, 1.42). Time to antibiotics, ICU LOS, 3- or 30-day mortality rates did not differ, yet median hospital LOS was significantly longer in those transported by EMS versus self-transported (6.5 vs. 5.3 days).ConclusionsChildren with sepsis transported by EMS are a sicker population of children than those self-transported on arrival and had longer hospital stays. EMS transport was associated with earlier in-hospital fluid resuscitation but no difference in time to first antibiotic. Improved prehospital recognition and care is needed to promote adherence to both prehospital and hospital-based sepsis resuscitation benchmarks.     

The Time Cost of Prehospital Intubation andIntravenous Access in Trauma Patients

Objectives. The prehospital management of trauma patients remains controversial. Little is known about the time each procedure contributes to the on-scene duration, andthis information would be helpful in prioritizing which procedures to perform in the prehospital setting. We sought to estimate the contribution of procedures to on-scene duration focusing on intubation andestablishment of intravenous (IV) access. Methods. Data were provided by the Office of Emergency Planning andResponse at the Mississippi Department of Health. Real-time prehospital patient-level data are collected by emergency medical services (EMS) providers for all 9-1-1 calls statewide. Linear regression was performed to determine the overall additional time for an average procedure andto calculate marginal increases in on-scene time associated with the establishment of IV access andwith endotracheal intubation. Analyses were performed using Stata 9. Results. During 2001–2005, 192,055 prehospital runs were made for trauma patients. 121,495 (63%) included prehospital procedures. Average on-scene duration for those runs was 15:24 (minutes:seconds). On average, each procedure was associated with an addition of 1 minute to the on-scene duration (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58–62 seconds). A scene involving the establishment of IV access was 5:04 longer, while one involving tracheal intubation was 2:36 longer. Conclusions. We estimate the marginal increase in on-scene duration associated with the performance of an average procedure, establishment of IV access, andendotracheal intubation. There are policy andplanning implications for the time trade-off of prehospital procedures, especially discretionary ones.     

Comparison of physician-staffed helicopter with ground-based emergency medical services for trauma patients

IntroductionFew studies have discussed whether physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) provide temporal and geographical benefits for patients in remote locations compared to ground emergency medical services (GEMS). Our study seeks to clarify the significance of HEMS for patients with severe trauma by comparing the mortality of patients transported directly from crash scenes by HEMS or GEMS, taking geographical factors into account.MethodsUsing medical records from a single center, collected from January 2014 to December 2018, we retrospectively identified 1674 trauma patients. Using propensity score analysis, we selected adult patients with an injury severity score ≥16, divided them into groups depending on their transport to the hospital by HEMS or GEMS, and compared their mortality within 24 h of hospitalization. For propensity score-matched groups, we analyzed distance and time.ResultsOf the 317 eligible patients, 202 were transported by HEMS. In the propensity score matching analysis, there was no significant difference in mortality between the HEMS and GEMS groups: 8.7% vs. 5.8%, odds ratio (OR), 1.547 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.530–4.514). The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW): 11% vs. 7.8%, OR, 1.080 (95% CI, 0.640–1.823); stabilized IPTW: 11% vs. 7.8%, OR, 1.080 (95% CI, 0.502–2.324); and truncated IPTW: 10% vs. 6.4%, OR, 1.143 (95% CI, 0.654–1.997). The distance from the crash scene to the hospital was farther in the HEMS group, and it took a longer period of time to arrive at the hospital (P < 0.001).ConclusionsHEMS may provide equal treatment opportunities and minimize trauma deaths for patients transported from a greater distance to an emergency medical center compared to GEMS for patients transported from nearby regions.     

Efficacy of the presence of an emergency physician in prehospital major trauma care: A nationwide cohort study in Japan

PurposeThe beneficial effect of the presence of an emergency physician in prehospital major trauma care is controversial. The aim in this study is to assess whether an emergency physician on scene can improve survival outcome of critical trauma patients.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted by using nationwide trauma registry data between 2004 and 2013 in Japan. Severe trauma patients (injury severity score (ISS) ≥ 16) who were transported directly to the hospital from the injury site were included in our analysis. Patients who were predicted to be untreatable (abbreviated injury score (AIS) = 6 and/or cardiopulmonary arrest at least one time before hospital arrival) were excluded. Participants were divided into either a physician or paramedics group based on the prehospital practitioner. The primary outcome was survival rate at discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the outcome with adjustment for age, gender, ISS, cause of injury, and pre-hospital vital signs.ResultsA total of 30,283 patients were eligible for the selection criteria (physician: 1222, paramedics: 29,061). Overall, 172 patients (14.1%) died in the physician group compared to 3508 patients (12.1%) in the paramedics group. Patients in the physician group had higher ISSs than those in the paramedics group. In multivariable logistic regression, the physician group had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97 to 1.40, p = 0.11) for in-hospital survival.ConclusionsOur results failed to show a difference in survival at discharge between non-physician-staffed ambulances and physician-staffed ambulances.     

Examining emergency medical services' prehospital transport times for trauma patients during COVID-19

IntroductionLonger prehospital times were associated with increased odds for survival in trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to determine how the COVID-19 pandemic affected emergency medical services (EMS) prehospital times for trauma patients.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study compared trauma patients transported via EMS to six US level I trauma centers admitted 1/1/19–12/31/19 (2019) and 3/16/20–6/30/20 (COVID-19). Outcomes included: total EMS pre-hospital time (dispatch to hospital arrival), injury to dispatch time, response time (dispatch to scene arrival), on-scene time (scene arrival to scene departure), and transportation time (scene departure to hospital arrival). Fisher's exact, chi-squared, or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used, alpha = 0.05. All times are presented as median (IQR) minutes.ResultsThere were 9400 trauma patients transported by EMS: 79% in 2019 and 21% during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients were similar in demographics and transportation mode. Emergency room deaths were also similar between 2019 and COVID-19 [0.6% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.13].There were no differences between 2019 and during COVID-19 for total EMS prehospital time [44 (33, 63) vs. 43 (33, 62), p = 0.12], time from injury to dispatch [16 (6, 55) vs. 16 (7, 77), p = 0.41], response time [7 (5, 12) for both groups, p = 0.27], or on-scene time [16 (12−22) vs. 17 (12,22), p = 0.31]. Compared to 2019, transportation time was significantly shorter during COVID-19 [18 (13, 28) vs. 17 (12, 26), p = 0.01].ConclusionThe median transportation time for trauma patients was marginally significantly shorter during COVID-19; otherwise, EMS prehospital times were not significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.     

Needle thoracostomy in the prehospital setting

Objectives. To determine the effect of needle thoracostomy (NT) in the prehospital setting, its frequency of use, and its complication rate. Methods. This was a prospective case series from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 1996. Inclusion criteria were all patients who met trauma center criteria, were transported by paramedics to Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center (a large, urban, level I trauma center), and had placement of a prehospital NT. Results. Out of 6, 241 major trauma patients transported by paramedics over the study period, 108 (1.7%) underwent 114 NTs. Sixty-four patients (59%) sustained gunshot wounds, 32 (30%) sustained stab wounds, eight (7%) were involved in motor vehicle accidents, and the remainder had other types of blunt trauma. The mean injury severity score (ISS) was 22.3, and the overall mortality rate was 28%. Of the patients who received NTs, five (5%) showed objective improvement in field vital signs and seven (7%) had subjective improvement of their dyspnea. Two NTs were found to have not penetrated into the thorax with the catheter tip in the soft tissue. Two patients (2%) received NTs despite the absence of any chest injuries found upon operative intervention, resulting in two iatrogenic pneumothoraxes. No other complications, including vascular injury or infection, were found in any of the patients. Conclusion. Prehospital NT is a procedure infrequently performed by paramedics, even in a busy urban area. While there is a risk of the procedure's being done without proper indication, NT may improve outcomes in a small subset of chest-injured patients.     

Do Pediatric Teams Affect Outcomes of Injured Children Requiring Inter-hospital Transport?

Introduction: Studies show that pediatric trauma centers produce better outcomes and reduced mortality for injured children. Yet, most children do not have timely access to a pediatric trauma center and require stabilization locally with subsequent transfer. Investigators have demonstrated that pediatric transport teams (PTT) improve outcomes for critically ill children; however, these studies did not differentiate outcomes for injured children. It may be that moderate to severely injured children actually fare worse with PTT due to slower transport times inherent to their remote locations and thus delays in important interventions. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if outcomes for injured children are affected by use of PTT for inter-hospital transfer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 1,177 children transferred to a pediatric trauma center for injury care between March 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2013. We compared children who were transported by PTT (ground/air) to those transported by ground advanced life support (ALS) and air critical care (ACC). We described patient characteristics and transport times. For PTT vs. ALS and ACC, we compared hospital length of stay (LOS), transport interventions and adverse events. Results: 1,177 injured children were transferred by the following modes: 68% ALS, 13% ACC, 11% Ground PTT, and 9% Air PTT. Children transported by PTT were younger and had higher ISS and lower GCS scores. PTT had a longer total transport time, departure preparation time, and patient bedside time. After controlling for age, ISS, GCS, transport mode, distance, and time, we found no significant difference in LOS between PTT vs. ALS and ACC. A subgroup analysis of children with higher ISS scores demonstrated a 65% longer LOS for children transported by ACC vs. PTT. There were no differences between transport teams with regard to acidosis, hypocarbia or hypercarbia, or maintenance of tubes and lines. Conclusions: Children transported by PTT were younger and sicker (vs. ACC and ALS). Despite longer transport times, children transported by PTT did not have a longer hospital LOS or adverse events during transport. However, for those children with higher ISS, transport by ACC resulted in longer hospital LOS vs. PTT.     

Outcomes of Blunt Trauma Victims Transported by HEMS from Rural andUrban Scenes

Objective. Mortality differences exist between victims of urban andrural trauma; however, it is unknown if these differences persist in those patients who survive to HEMS transport. This study examined the in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, anddischarge status of adult blunt trauma victims transported by HEMS from rural andurban scenes to regional trauma centers. Methods. Retrospective review of all adult (age ≥ 15) HEMS transports in 2001; 271 urban and141 rural blunt trauma patients were identified from HEMS transport records andthe trauma registries at three level one trauma centers. Demographic data, scene andhospital interventions, as well as discharge status of the two groups were examined. Results. Total mileage [27 ± 12 vs. 119 ± 64, p < 0.001], total flight times (minutes) [30 ± 10 vs. 79 ± 40, p < 0.001], andscene times (minutes) [16 ± 8 vs. 21 ± 14, p < 0.001] were significantly longer for rural flights. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to age, gender, receiving hospital, andinitial HEMS vitals. Injury Severity Score, ICU length of stay (LOS), total hospital LOS, andhospital mortality did not differ between the two groups. After controlling for age, gender, andISS, there were no significant mortality differences between the two groups (p = 0.074). Conclusions. Despite longer flight andscene times for rural patients, adjusted in-hospital mortality rates were similar for patients transported from urban andrural scenes. Factors prior to HEMS arrival may contribute to increased mortality rates of rural blunt trauma victims documented nationally.     

The effect of prehospital transport time on the mortality from traumatic injury

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a prehospital time threshold (PhTT) exists that when exceeded, significantly increases the mortality of trauma patients transported directly from the scene of injury to a trauma center rather than to the closest hospital. DESIGN: Review of data contained within the Illinois Trauma Registry encompassing the period from fall 1989 through spring 1991. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5,215 injured persons with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 10, cared for in an Illinois level-I or -II trauma center outside of the city of Chicago. MEASUREMENTS: Injury severity expressed as ISS, scene time (ST), transport time (TrT), total emergency medical services time (TEMST), and outcome were determined for each patient. Patients were stratified into groups on the basis of ISS. RESULTS: Patient outcomes were significantly different statistically between ISS groups (p < 0.001, chi 2). Mean ST and TEMST, but not TrT, were significantly different statistically between ISS groups (p < 0.001, analysis of variance). Lower ISS was associated with longer times. Mean ST, TrT, and TEMST were significantly different statistically between survivors and nonsurvivors (p < 0.001, two-sample t-tests). Survival was associated with longer times. Each of the mean times remained significantly different between survivors and nonsurvivors after controlling for severity of injury (p < 0.001, two-way analysis of variance). CONCLUSION: No PhTT beyond which time patient transport to the closest hospital would have decreased mortality was identifiable, because no prehospital time < 90 minutes exerted a significant adverse effect upon survival.     

Is it Appropriate for Patients to be Discharged at the Scene by Paramedics?

Background: Outcomes of patients who are discharged at the scene by paramedics are not fully understood. Objective: We aimed to describe the risk of re-presentation and/or death in prehospital patients discharged at the scene. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked ambulance, emergency department (ED), and death data. We compared outcomes in patients who were discharged at the scene by paramedics with those who were transported to ED by paramedics and then discharged from ED between January 1 and December 31, 2013 in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia. Occurrences of subsequent ambulance requests, ED attendance, hospital admission and death were compared between those discharged at the scene and those discharged from ED. Results: There were 47,330 patients during the study period, of whom 19,732 and 27,598 patients were discharged at the scene and from ED, respectively. Compared to those discharged from ED, those discharged at the scene were more likely to subsequently: request an ambulance (6.1% vs. 1.8%, adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0–3.9), attend ED (4.6% vs. 1.4%, adj OR 3.3; 95% CI 2.8–3.8), be admitted to hospital (3.3% vs. 0.8%, adj OR 4.2; 95% CI 3.4–5.1). Those discharged at the scene tended towards an increased likelihood of death (0.2% vs. 0.1%, adj OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.99–3.2) within 24 hours of discharge compared to those discharged from ED. Conclusion: Patients attended by paramedics who were discharged at the scene had more subsequent events than those who were transported to and discharged from ED. Further consideration needs to be given to who is suitable to be discharged at the scene by paramedics.     

Patient Characteristics and Temporal Trends in Police Transport of Blunt Trauma Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Police transport (PT) of penetrating trauma patients has the potential to decrease prehospital times for patients with life-threatening hemorrhage and is part of official policy in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. We hypothesized that rates of PT of bluntly injured patients have increased over the past decade. Methods: We used Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study registry data from 2006–15 to identify bluntly injured adult patients transported to all 8 trauma centers in Philadelphia. PT was compared to ambulance transport, excluding transfers, burn patients, and private transport. We compared demographics, mechanism, and injury outcomes between PT and ambulance transport patients and used multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors of PT. We also identified physiological indicators and injury patterns that might have benefitted from prehospital intervention by EMS. Results: Of 28 897 bluntly injured patients, 339 (1.2%) were transported by police and 28 558 (98.8%) by ambulance. Blunt trauma accounted for 11% of PT and penetrating trauma for 89%. PT patients were younger, more likely to be male, and more likely to be African American or Asian and were more often injured by assault or motor vehicle crash. There were no significant differences presenting physiology between PT and EMS patients. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, male sex (OR 1.89, 95%CI 1.40–2.55), African American race (OR 1.71 95%CI 1.34–2.18), and Asian race (OR 2.25, 95%CI 1.22–4.14) were independently associated with PT. Controlling for injury severity and physiology, there was no significant difference in mortality between PT and EMS. Overall, 64% of PT patients had a condition that might have benefited from prehospital intervention such as supplemental oxygen for brain injury or spine stabilization for vertebral fractures. Conclusions: PT affects a small minority of blunt trauma patients, and did not appear associated with higher mortality. However, PT patients included many who might have benefited from proven, prehospital intervention. Clinicians, EMS providers, and law enforcement should collaborate to optimize use of PT within the trauma system.     

Automatic acoustic gunshot sensor technology’s impact on trauma care

IntroductionAs cities nation-wide combat gun violence, with less than 20% of shots fired reported to police, use of acoustic gunshot sensor (AGS) technology is increasingly common. However, there are no studies to date investigating whether these technologies affect outcomes for victims of gunshot wounds (GSW). We hypothesized that the AGS technology would be associated with decreased prehospital transport time.MethodsAll GSW patients from 2014 to 2016 were collected from our institutional registry and cross-referenced with local police department data regarding times and locations of AGS alerts. Each GSW incident was categorized as related or unrelated to an AGS alert. Admission data, trauma outcomes, and prehospital time were then compared.ResultsWe analyzed 731 patients. Of these, 192 were AGS-related (26%) and 539 were not (74%). AGS-related patients were more likely to be female (p < 0.01), have a higher injury severity score (ISS) (p < 0.01), and require an operation (p = 0.03). Ventilator days (p < 0.05) and hospital length of stay (p < 0.01) was greater in the AGS cohort. Mortality, however, did not differ between groups (p = 0.5). On multivariable analysis, both total prehospital time and on-scene time were lower in the AGS group (p < 0.01).ConclusionOur study suggests reduced transport times, decreased prehospital and emergency medical service on-scene times with AGS technology. Additionally, despite higher ISS and use of more hospital resources, mortality was similar to non-AGS counterparts. The potential of AGS technology to further decrease prehospital times in the urban setting may provide an opportunity to improve outcomes in trauma patients with penetrating injuries.     

Association Between Mode of Transportation and Outcomes in Penetrating Trauma Across Different Prehospital Time Intervals: A Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundNational guidelines do not provide recommendations concerning optimal dispatch time for helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) in the United States.ObjectivesThis study describes the association between mode of transport (ground vs. helicopter) and survival of patients with penetrating injury across different prehospital time intervals and proposes evidence-based time-related dispatch criteria for HEMS.MethodsA retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using the 2015 National Trauma Data Bank. Adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) with penetrating injuries were included. Patients transported via HEMS were selected and matched (1 to 1) for 17 variables to patients transported by ground ambulance (GEMS). Bivariate analyses were conducted to compare characteristics and outcomes (survival to hospital discharge) of patients across different prehospital time intervals.ResultsEach group consisted of 949 patients. Overall survival rate was similar in both groups (90.6% for HEMS vs. 87.9% for GEMS, p = 0.054). Patients transported by HEMS had significantly higher survival compared with those transported by GEMS (92.5% for HEMS vs. 87.0% for GEMS, p = 0.002) in the 0–60-min time interval from dispatch to arrival to hospital, and more specifically, in the 31–60-min interval (92.2% vs. 85.2%, p = 0.001). No difference in survival between the two groups was observed in the shortest (0–30 min) or in the extended prehospital time intervals (>60 min).ConclusionIn adult patients with penetrating trauma, HEMS transport was associated with improved survival in a specific total prehospital time interval (31 to 60 min). This finding can help emergency medicine service administrators develop evidence-based HEMS dispatch criteria.     

Relative Mortality Analysis Of The “Golden Hour”: A Comprehensive Acuity Stratification Approach To Address Disagreement In Current Literature

Objective: This study sought to address the disagreement in literature regarding the “golden hour” in trauma by using the Relative Mortality Analysis to overcome previous studies’ limitations in accounting for acuity when evaluating the impact of prehospital time on mortality.

Methods: The previous studies that failed to support the “golden hour” suffered from limitations in their efforts to account for the confounding effects of patient acuity on the relationship between prehospital time and mortality in their trauma populations. The Relative Mortality Analysis was designed to directly address these limitations using a novel acuity stratification approach, based on patients’ probability of survival (PoS), a comprehensive triage metric calculated using Trauma and Injury Severity Score methodology. For this analysis, the population selection and analysis methods of these previous studies were compared to the Relative Mortality Analysis on how they capture the relationship between prehospital time and mortality in the University of Virginia (UVA) Trauma Center population.

Results: The methods of the previous studies that failed to support the “golden hour” also failed to do so when applied to the UVA Trauma Center population. However, when applied to the same population, the Relative Mortality Analysis identified a subgroup, 9.9% (with a PoS 23%–91%), of the 5,063 patient population with significantly lower mortality when transported to the hospital within 1?hour, supporting the “golden hour.”

Conclusion: These results suggest that previous studies failed to support the “golden hour” not due to a lack of patients significantly impacted by prehospital time within their trauma populations, but instead due to limitations in their efforts to account for patient acuity. As a result, these studies inappropriately rejected the “golden hour,” leading to the current disagreement in literature regarding the relationship between prehospital time and trauma patient mortality. The Relative Mortality Analysis was shown to overcome the limitations of these studies and demonstrated that the “golden hour” was significant for patients who were not low acuity (PoS >91%) or severely high acuity (PoS <23%).     

Scene disposition and mode of transport following rural trauma: a prospective cohort study comparing patient costs

This prospective cohort study was performed from 1994 to 1996 to compare the impact of scene disposition on prehospital and hospital costs incurred by rural trauma patients transported to a trauma center by helicopter or ground ambulance. The study included all rural adult injury victims who arrived at the tertiary trauma center by ambulance within 24 h of injury. Inclusion criteria consisted of inpatient admission or death in the emergency department, and any traumatic injury except burns. Data collected included mortality, mode of transport, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and costs from impact to discharge or death. Of 105 study patients, 52 initially went to a rural hospital, while 53 went directly to the trauma center. There was no significant difference in survival in the two groups. The ISS was significantly higher for patients taken directly to the trauma center from the scene. The ISS of trauma patients transported from the rural hospital was highest for patients sent by ground transport. The prehospital transport costs were significantly more for patients transported to a rural hospital first. The costs incurred at the trauma center were highest for those patients transported directly from the scene. Many severely injured patients were initially transported to a rural hospital rather than directly to the trauma center. At both the scene and rural hospital, consistent use of triage criteria appeared to be lacking in determining the severity of injury, appropriate destination, and mode of transport for trauma patients. Since no significant difference in prehospital helicopter and ground transport costs was demonstrated, the decision on mode of transport should be in the best interest of patient care.     

Prehospital interventions: on-scene-time and ambulance-technicians' experience

INTRODUCTION: Very little evidence is available on the experience of ambulance-personnels or on the impact of prehospital interventions on total prehospital time. HYPOTHESIS: On-scene-time increases with the number of prehospital techniques used, and ambulance-technicians achieve only limited clinical experience in prehospital techniques. METHODS: Prospective, observational registry study including 56 ambulance technicians from two ambulance stations in the mixed urban/rural county and 5,557 patients who were brought to a hospital in 1998. The number of cases in which each ambulance-technician performed various kinds of prehospital techniques, and the average on-scene time for each prehospital technique and several combinations of prehospital techniques were calculated. RESULTS: There were large differences between the number of times each technique was used. On-scene time was smallest when no techniques were used and tended to increase with the number of interventions used. On-scene-time was relatively low for patients with cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: The Danish ambulance-technicians' curriculum includes interventions for which the technicians only achieve limited practical experience. Prehospital interventions are associated with an increase of on-scene time.     

Influence of Entrapment on Prehospital Management and the Hospital Course in Polytrauma Patients: A Retrospective Analysis in Air Rescue

Background

Entrapment is a challenging and crucial factor in the prehospital setting. Few studies have addressed whether entrapment has an influence on on-scene treatment or on the following hospital course.

Body Temperature after EMS Transport: Association with Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes

Introduction: Low body temperatures following prehospital transport are associated with poor outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, a minimal amount is known about potential associations across a range of temperatures obtained immediately after prehospital transport. Furthermore, a minimal amount is known about the influence of body temperature on non-mortality outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between temperatures obtained immediately following prehospital transport and TBI outcomes across the entire range of temperatures. Methods: This retrospective observational study included all moderate/severe TBI cases (CDC Barell Matrix Type 1) in the pre-implementation cohort of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) TBI Study (NIH/NINDS: 1R01NS071049). Cases were compared across four cohorts of initial trauma center temperature (ITCT): <35.0°C [Very Low Temperature (VLT)]; 35.0–35.9°C [Low Temperature (LT)]; 36.0–37.9°C [Normal Temperature (NT)]; and ≥38.0°C [Elevated Temperature (ET)]. Multivariable analysis was performed adjusting for injury severity score, age, sex, race, ethnicity, blunt/penetrating trauma, and payment source. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mortality were calculated. To evaluate non-mortality outcomes, deaths were excluded and the adjusted median increase in hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS and total hospital charges were calculated for each ITCT group and compared to the NT group. Results: 22,925 cases were identified and cases with interfacility transfer (7361, 32%), no EMS transport (1213, 5%), missing ITCT (2083, 9%), or missing demographic data (391, 2%) were excluded. Within this study cohort the aORs for death (compared to the NT group) were 2.41 (CI: 1.83–3.17) for VLT, 1.62 (CI: 1.37–1.93) for LT, and 1.86 (CI: 1.52–3.00) for ET. Similarly, trauma center (TC) LOS, ICU LOS, and total TC charges increased in all temperature groups when compared to NT. Conclusion: In this large, statewide study of major TBI, both ETs and LTs immediately following prehospital transport were independently associated with higher mortality and with increased TC LOS, ICU LOS, and total TC charges. Further study is needed to identify the causes of abnormal body temperature during the prehospital interval and if in-field measures to prevent temperature variations might improve outcomes.