Large de novo renal cell carcinoma in a 10-year-old transplanted kidney: successful organ-preserving therapy

BACKGROUND: A recent review of the Cincinnati Transplant Tumor Registry recorded 24 de novo renal cell carcinomas developing in renal allografts. However, late development of these tumors after transplantation is very rare. Only four reports exist regarding conservative surgery on kidney transplant tumors. METHODS: This is a report on a case of a large 6-cm de novo renal cell carcinoma in a 10-year-old transplanted kidney. Optimal therapy by transplant nephrectomy or tumor enucleation was discussed. RESULTS: Partial resections or enucleations of renal cell carcinoma are still less than ideal in carcinomas larger than 3 cm considering the higher risk of local recurrence. But the recipient in this case had done so well and had had such a high quality of life after transplantation that partial nephrectomy as therapy of choice was selected. Now the patient is 2 years tumor free. CONCLUSION: The case report demonstrates that in certain select cases of large tumors, organ-preserving surgery could be an alternative approach in combining complete tumor removal with preservation of graft function.     

Nephron-sparing surgery for de novo renal cell carcinoma in allograft kidneys

Renal cell carcinomas account for 4.6% of post-transplant cancers, 10% of which occur in allograft kidneys. We report three such cases among kidney grafts that were performed or followed from 1970 to 2004. In all patients, we performed a partial allograft nephrectomy after consideration of the tumor size, location, and absence of metastases and local extension. Renal function has remained stable, and there has been no sign of graft rejection, tumor recurrence or metastases. The surgery was technically feasible without exposing the patients to increased postoperative risks. The lateral, peripherally located tumor allowed excision without renal hilar dissection or entry into the collecting system. In agreement with data emerging from the literature, the present cases confirm that even in the setting of long-standing immunosuppression, de novo RCC of the kidney graft warrants a minimally invasive approach to spare patients graft loss and return to hemodialysis.     

Noninvasive therapy of incidental de novo renal cell carcinoma in a kidney allograft 12 years after transplantation: report of a case and review of literature

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive therapy increases the incidence of posttransplantation cancer. Primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 4.6% of all cancers in transplant recipients. The treatment options for RCC in a renal allograft include radical nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery. We report the case of a patient who underwent percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of a RCC in the grafted kidney. PATIENT AND METHODS: Twelve years after undergoing heterotopic, allogenic kidney transplantation, a de novo lesion was diagnosed in the upper pole of the kidney graft in a 77-year-old patient during routine duplex ultrasonography. The magnetic resonance image showed a spherical lesion of 17 mm in diameter, which undoubtedly showed radiological signs of a RCC. After adequately informing the patient about alternative treatment strategies and the associated risks, we made an interdisciplinary decision for a percutaneous RFA of the lesion. RESULTS: After the intervention, graft function remained unchanged and is still good at 6 months with no signs of local recurrence on follow-up MRI. A small coagulation defect at the site of the former lesion was the only morphological change. There was also no evidence of distant tumor spread. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous RFA seems an acceptable, allograft-preserving treatment option associated with low morbidity and mortality for RCC in a renal allograft considering the significant risks associated with open partial nephrectomy in a kidney graft.     

De novo malignancies after kidney and liver transplantations: experience on 582 consecutive cases

De novo malignancies after transplantation are a growing problem of solid organ transplant recipients, due to longer survival follow-up under chronic immunosuppression. The aim of this study was to analyze a population of 582 consecutive kidney (n = 382) and liver (n = 202) transplant recipients, who survived at least 12 months after transplantation, at a single transplant center for the development of de novo cancers. The incidence of de novo malignancies was 7% after both renal and liver transplantation. The median elapsed time from transplant to the diagnosis of de novo malignancy was 45 months (range 3 to 220) months for kidney and 37 months (range 12 to 101 months) for liver transplants. Skin cancers were the most common within renal recipients, while gastroenteric cancers were more frequently encountered in liver transplants. Oropharyngeal and upper digestive tract tumors were always associated with a history of chronic alcohol consumption in liver recipients. Liver transplant recipients treated for acute rejection had a worse cancer prognosis than patients without rejection 1- and 2-year survivals 83% and 63% versus 36% and 17% (P = .026). The estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates for all types of de novo malignancies were 79% and 66%, including 64% and 51% for solid organ tumors versus 89% and 89% for skin cancers and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) (P = .17) in renal transplants and 70% and 42%, including 57% and 28% for solid organ tumors versus 85% and 64% for skin cancers and PTLD (P = .43) in liver transplants respectively.     

肾移植受者新发恶性肿瘤的生存分析

目的 探讨肾移植受者术后新发恶性肿瘤的预后.方法 分析1978年1月至2008年12月期间3150例次肾移植受者的资料,其中共有59例患者术后新发恶性肿瘤,肿瘤的发生部位分别为:原肾肾癌6例,原肾肾盂输尿管癌4例,膀胱癌14例,前列腺癌7例,肝癌9例,胃癌3例,肠癌2例,胰腺癌1例,乳腺癌4例,宫颈癌3例,皮肤癌2例,肺癌2例,甲状腺癌1例,移植后淋巴增殖性疾病1例.将上述肾移植后新发恶性肿瘤的59例患者作为移植人群肿瘤组;另选择同期普通人群中性别相同、肿瘤确诊时年龄相同、肿瘤病理诊断以及病理分期相同的59例患者作为普通人群肿瘤组,比较两组患者肿瘤发生后的存活情况.用Cox风险分析模型对影响移植后新发肿瘤患者存活的因素进行分析.结果 肾移植术后恶性肿瘤的总体发生率为1.9%(59/3150),以泌尿系统恶性肿瘤最为常见.移植人群肿瘤组和普通人群肿瘤组患者的5年存活率分别为30%和75%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).多因素分析表明,肿瘤病理分期是影响移植后新发肿瘤患者存活率的主要不利因素;外科手术和肿瘤发病时移植肾功能正常则是提高患者存活率的保护性因素.结论 与普通人群中的肿瘤患者相比,肾移植受者发生恶性肿瘤后的5年存活率明显降低.     

De novo fibrillary glomerulopathy in the renal allograft of a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus

Lupus glomerulonephritis is a complication of systemic lupus erythematosus, with 10% of the patients developing end-stage renal disease. It is accepted that lupus patients are good candidates for kidney transplantation and that the disease activity is subdued after transplantation due to rigorous immunosuppression, with a low rate of graft loss due to recurrent glomerulonephritis. While recurrent fibrillary glomerulopathy has been reported in renal allografts, de novo disease has not. We report a patient with systemic lupus who underwent a renal transplantation and subsequently lost her allograft due to de novo fibrillary glomerulopathy. Four years after her first kidney transplant, the patient presented with acute deterioration of her renal function. A renal biopsy was performed, and it revealed a focal mesangioproliferative pattern with positive amorphous mesangial immunofluorescence staining for IgG and C3. Congo red staining was negative. Electron microscopy demonstrated the presence of randomly oriented nonamyloid fibrils in the mesangiun. The diagnosis of de novo fibrillary glomerulopathy was made. The patient lost her allograft and received a second cadaveric renal transplant 1 year later. She has had a stable renal function since then.     

Bilateral native nephrectomy for refractory hypertension in kidney transplant and kidney pancreas transplant patients

Hypertension is common in renal transplant patients and sometimes very difficult to control. Refractory hypertension can adversely affect renal graft and patient survival. Many antihypertensive medications are not well tolerated or can have important drug interactions with immunosuppressive medications. These drugs can cause significant side effects including fluid depletion, azotemia, electrolyte imbalance, and anemia. Bilateral native nephrectomy in renal transplant patients has been reported to be beneficial in controlling severe hypertension.We report five patients with severe hypertension despite as many as 9 different antihypertensive medications. All patients had previous kidney or simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation. Each of our patients underwent laparoscopic bilateral native nephrectomy.Renal function varied from creatinine of 1.4–2.4, and the number of antihypertensive medications from 3 to 9 at the time of nephrectomy surgery. Mean arterial blood pressure improved in all five patients at 3–6 months post nephrectomy, the number of antihypertensive medications decreased in 4, but renal function remained stable at 3–6 months in only 3 patients.We found laparoscopic bilateral native nephrectomy to be beneficial in renal and simultaneous kidney pancreas transplant patients with severe and refractory hypertension. Our patients with better baseline renal allograft function at time of nephrectomy received the most benefit. No decrease in allograft function could be attributed to acute rejection.     

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Allograft Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report

BackgroundNephron-sparing surgery is required for patients with kidney transplant with organ-confined renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the allograft kidney to preserve renal function. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is expected to be the optimal surgical approach for these patients, as in the general population. However, RAPN for RCC arising in the allograft kidney is rarely reported. Here, we report 2 cases of patients who underwent RAPN for allograft RCC.Case presentationTwo patients were diagnosed with RCC in the renal allograft based on enhanced computed tomography findings. Case 1 was a 69-year-old man with a 32-mm mass in the middle portion of the right iliac fossa renal allograft, and case 2 was a 55-year-old man with a 24-mm mass in the lower pole of the right iliac fossa renal allograft. In each patient, RAPN was performed for the renal mass through a transperitoneal approach, with clamping of the renal artery. No major perioperative complications occurred in either patient, negative surgical margins were achieved, and no significant changes in kidney function were observed during either surgery. Pathologic findings showed clear cell RCC in case 1 and papillary RCC in case 2.ConclusionRAPN can be a feasible and effective treatment option for allograft RCC.     

De novo gastrointestinal tumours after renal transplantation: role of CMV and EBV viruses

The development of new and more effective immunosuppressive agents has provided long-term survival for transplant recipients, thereby increasing the risk of de novo malignancy in chronic immunocompromised hosts. While de novo post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases and skin cancer has been shown to have an increased incidence in long-term surviving solid organ transplant recipients, the association with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is controversial. Over 12 yr, 20 patients (5%) out of 395 renal transplant recipients developed 23 de novo tumours; 11 skin cancer and 12 non-skin cancer. Four patients (1%) developed de novo tumours of the GI tract (three colon, and one gastric cancer). Immediately after tumour's diagnosis, immunosuppressive therapy was reduced; all patients were shifted from cyclosporine to Rapamicine within 30 d. The tumour was surgically resected with curative intent in three cases, while one patient had only palliative surgery because of metastatic disease. The post-operative courses was uneventful. All patients maintained normal graft function. However, three out of four patients (75%) died of progression of the neoplasm, within a median time from the diagnosis of 12 months. Further, we investigated a possible correlations between de novo GI cancer and HCV, HBV status, infections, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, episodes of rejection, and blood transfusions. All cases with GI de novo cancers reported in this paper developed CMV and EBV reactivation within three months after transplantation. Thereafter we suggest a closer follow-up for de novo GI cancer in renal transplants with early CMV and EBV reactivation in order to avoid delayed diagnosis.     

Nephron Sparing Surgery for De Novo Renal Cell Carcinoma in an Allograft Kidney: A Case Report

De novo renal cell carcinoma in a renal allograft is rare and has special implications in renal transplant recipients. We describe a patient with a renal allograft who developed a de novo renal cell carcinoma in the functioning renal allograft 258 months after transplantation. The patient underwent enucleation of the tumor because preoperative MRI showed it was well-encapsulated. A DNA banding study showed that the tumor originated from the donor. Indications for conservative renal surgery in renal cell carcinoma have been increasing. Accordingly, 1 option in the treatment of de novo renal cell carcinoma in a functioning renal allograft is enucleation as a method of nephron sparing surgery.     

Aortoiliac aneurysm repair in kidney transplant recipients

A potential problem during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or open repair in renal allograft patients is ischemia of the transplanted kidney. In this study, kidney transplant patients who underwent aortic aneurysm repair in our institution were added to similar cases extracted from the literature to represent the basis of this work. Comparisons between patients treated with open surgery versus EVAR were performed in terms of renal function. In the EVAR group, most aneurysms were infrarenal, and 84% were treated with modular bifurcated devices. Protective kidney allograft perfusion measures were not used. The pre- and postoperative Cr was 1.69 and 1.73 mg/dL, respectively (P = .412). All EVAR patients had good outcomes. Complications included 8 endoleaks and 1 limb ischemia case. Three patients died from aortic repair-unrelated reasons. In the open group, the pre-and postoperative Cr was 1.45 and 1.37 mg/dL, respectively (P = .055). Most cases were infrarenal and mostly treated by aortobiiliac bypasses. In 16%, no adjuvant allograft perfusion was provided. In the rest, temporary axillofemoral bypasses were used most often. Most outcomes were favorable (57%). Reported procedural-related complications included arterial embolism, wound infection, and pneumonia. Deaths were reported in 5 occasions (none allograft failure dependent). No differences in Cr between EVAR and open techniques (P = .13) were seen. Aneurysm repair in kidney transplant recipients is associated with excellent renal preservation. Adverse outcomes were all allograft failure independent in both groups. EVAR without special allograft protection measures seems to be equally effective as open surgery with or without adjuvant kidney transplant perfusion.     

Proteinuria following transplantation. Correlation with histopathology and outcome

A review of 693 renal transplant recipients revealed 77 (11%) in whom persistent, heavy proteinuria (greater than 2 g/24 hr) developed. Renal histology was available in all 77 patients. Twenty-one patients had received kidneys from living-related donors, the remaining 56 from cadaveric donors. The cause of proteinuria in these 77 patients was as follows: transplant glomerulopathy (30), allograft glomerulonephritis (22), chronic rejection (21), renal vein thrombosis (2), diabetic glomerulosclerosis (1), and hypertensive nephrosclerosis (1). Of the 22 patients who developed glomerulonephritis in the transplanted kidney, 6 had recurrent disease (3--membranous glomerulopathy, 2--focal sclerosis and hyalinosis, 1--membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis); 6 developed de novo glomerulonephritis; and in 10 the type of glomerulonephritis could not be classified as recurrent or as de novo because of lack of characterization of the original kidney disease. Renal vein thrombosis occurred in association with other lesions in an additional 5 cases (3--chronic rejection; 2--membranous glomerulopathy). In follow-up only 23.4% (18 of 77) of the patients maintained prolonged graft function; the majority of grafts being lost within one year of the development of persistent, heavy proteinuria. Of the 18 patients who retained their grafts, 8 had glomerulonephritis, 5 transplant glomerulopathy, and 5 chronic rejection. This study confirms the poor prognosis that has been reported with the development of nephrotic-range proteinuria in renal allograft recipients.     

Open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: experience with 400 cases

PURPOSE: We present a series of 400 patients with tumor in a solitary kidney who underwent open surgical partial nephrectomy performed by a single surgeon (ACN) with a primary focus on postoperative long-term kidney function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 400 patients with sporadic nonfamilial kidney tumors in a solitary kidney underwent open partial nephrectomy between 1980 and 2002. In 323 patients (81%) the contralateral kidney had been surgically removed, while the remaining 77 (19%) had a congenital solitary kidney. Renal insufficiency was present preoperatively in 184 patients (46%). Adverse risk factors for partial nephrectomy were present in a large percent of patients. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters were evaluated at a mean followup of 44 months. RESULTS: In the overall series 5 and 10-year cancer specific survival was 89% and 82%, respectively. Surgical complications occurred in 52 patients (13%), most commonly urinary leakage. Early postoperative renal function was achieved in 398 patients (99.5%). Only 2 patients required permanent dialysis postoperatively. Satisfactory long-term renal function was achieved in 382 patients (95.5%). A total of 18 patients had progressed to renal failure a mean of 3.6 years after surgery. Patient age, the amount of renal parenchyma resected, a congenitally absent or atrophic contralateral kidney and the time of contralateral nephrectomy were noted to be significantly associated with postoperative renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical partial nephrectomy can be safely performed in patients with tumor in a solitary kidney. Long-term cancer-free survival with the preservation of renal function can be reliably expected in most of these cases.     

Postinfectious glomerulonephritis in renal allograft recipients

Postinfectious glomerulonephritis (PIGN) is a rare etiology of de novo glomerulonephritis following kidney transplantation. To date, there have only been eight cases reported in the literature. We report an additional three patients transplanted at our institution between January 2000 and October 2004 who had clinical and pathologic findings consistent with posttransplant PIGN. All three patients were type 1 diabetics. One had received a cadaveric kidney transplant, one a simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant, and the third a living related kidney transplant followed by a pancreas transplant. All patients were on triple immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. In each case, an acute decline in allograft function developed in association with a known or suspected infectious process, and renal biopsies revealed an immune complex glomerulonephritis with features of PIGN. All regained renal function with treatment of their known or suspected infections and without specific therapies for their glomerulonephritis, including corticosteroids.     

Partial nephrectomy used to treat renal cell carcinoma arising in a live donor transplant kidney

There are few reported cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising in kidney allografts. Whether these tumours occur due to post-transplant malignant transformation or are present at the time of transplantation is unclear. The influence of immunosuppression must be considered in their development, progression and treatment. We report a case of a RCC presenting asymptomatically in a functioning live donor renal allograft 173 months after transplantation. In an attempt to avoid return to dialysis treatment, a partial nephrectomy was carried out. To optimise the procedure, and to assure cancer clearance, combined intraoperative ultrasound and frozen section analysis were used. Our patient remains disease free and dialysis independent at 22 months follow up. To our knowledge, this patient represents the only live donor organ transplant tumour reported to be treated using nephron-sparing surgery and remain dialysis independent. Partial nephrectomy should be considered as a treatment option in such cases.     

Kidney transplantation with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression: 5-year results of a randomized prospective trial compared to calcineurin inhibitor drugs

BACKGROUND: We report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized prospective trial in primary adult renal allograft recipients, designed to evaluate calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression on kidney transplant function. METHODS: Sixty-one patients were randomized to either sirolimus (n=31) or cyclosporine (n=30) after basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with steroids. Sirolimus was concentration controlled at 10-12 ng/mL for at least 6 months. RESULTS: After 5 years, sirolimus-MMF-steroids compared to cyclosporine-MMF-steroids provides similar patient survival (87.1 vs. 90%, P=0.681), acute rejection rates (12.9 vs. 23.3%, P=0.22), total cholesterol (209.1 vs. 204.3 mg/dL, P=0.973), urine protein/creatinine ratios (0.398 vs. 0.478 mg/dL, P=0.72), and overall medical and surgical morbidity (P=NS). Although unadjusted patient survival was similar, sirolimus based CNI-free patients had longer death censored graft survival (96.4 vs. 76.7%, P=0.0265), higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (66.7 vs. 50.7 cc/min, P=0.0075), and fewer graft losses from chronic allograft nephropathy. The Banff chronic scores at two years were strong predictors of 5-year GFR. At 5 years, there were six de novo (three solid organ, three skin) cancers in the CNI group and only two de novo (one skin, one leukemia, no solid organ) cancers in the sirolimus group (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: This study of low to moderate risk patients demonstrates that excellent 5-year kidney transplant outcomes can be achieved without CNI drugs, when therapeutic drug monitoring of sirolimus is employed. The application of CNI drug avoidance protocols to high-risk recipients (retransplants, highly sensitized, etc.), extrarenal allograft recipients, or alternative drug regimens such as steroid or MMF elimination should be subjected to controlled trials.     

A laparoscopic approach to allograft nephrectomy and bilateral native nephrectomy: a case report

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery is rapidly emerging as the standard of care for a variety of urological conditions, even among patients who have undergone prior renal transplantation. We describe the technique of bilateral native nephrectomy and allograft nephrectomy by laparoscopy. CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man with end-stage renal disease who had undergone a cadaveric renal transplant presented with chronic graft dysfunction. He had received a living donor kidney transplant with a postoperative course complicated by persistent proteinuria and refractory hypertension. Our nephrology service indicated the need for bilateral native nephrectomy and allograft nephrectomy for better blood pressure control following a second transplant. Bilateral native nephrectomy was performed following the previous reported techniques for pure laparoscopic nephrectomy. Allograft nephrectomy started by dissection of the iliac vessels to identify the vascular anastomosis. The hilum of the transplanted kidney was accessed. The renal vessels were clipped and transected. The ureter was identified and clipped. All three kidneys were removed from the abdominal cavity through a 3-cm skin incision. RESULTS: The left nephrectomy took 25 minutes and the right nephrectomy, 40 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 300 mL and the total operative time was 210 minutes. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged on the third postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of laparoscopic allograft nephrectomy and bilateral native nephrectomy in a transplant recipient.     

肾移植受者新发泌尿及男性生殖系统恶性肿瘤的生存分析

目的 探讨肾移植受者发生泌尿及男性生殖系统恶性肿瘤的预后. 方法 分析31例肾移植术后新发泌尿及男性生殖系统恶性肿瘤患者的临床资料,肾癌(原肾)6例,肾盂输尿管癌(原肾)4例,膀胱癌14例,前列腺癌7例.并与31例年龄相同、肿瘤分期相同的普通泌尿及男性生殖系统恶性肿瘤患者生存率行Cox风险分析,分析年龄、性别、移植年代、移植至诊断肿瘤时间、肿瘤病理分期、肿瘤诊断时移植肾功能、有无接受放化疗等辅助肿瘤治疗、有无抗淋巴细胞免疫球蛋白诱导治疗以及不同种类的基础免疫抑制剂等因素对肾移植受者泌尿及男性生殖系统恶性肿瘤生存率的影响. 结果 与普通人群相比,肾移植受者5年存活率明显降低(50%与68%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.02).多因素分析表明肿瘤分期、接受放化疗等辅助治疗及年龄是影响患者生存的不利因素,而外科手术和肿瘤发病时移植肾功能正常则是保护性因素. 结论 与普通人群相比,移植受者发生泌尿及男性生殖系统恶性肿瘤的生存率明显降低.     

Development of Urologic de Novo Malignancies After Renal Transplantation

Objectives

The incidence of neoplasms in renal transplant recipients is higher than in general population. The increasing age of donors and recipients also increases the risk of developing malignancies, including genitourinary. The aim of this study is to analyze clinical aspects and management of this complication.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1365 patients who underwent renal transplantation between 1977 and 2010 who were 44.6 ± 14.9 years old at the time of transplantation. The median follow-up was 95.6 months (range, 18.0–236.0). Data were analyzed for sex, age, time from transplant to diagnosis, location, clinical stage, immunosuppression, treatment, follow-up, and evolution.

Results

We diagnosed 25 de novo urologic neoplasms (25/1365; 1.8%) in 24 patients, with a median follow-up of 32 months (range, 12.5–51.8) from the diagnosis. Sixteen were male (66.7%) and 8 female (33.3%), with a median age at diagnosis of 59 years (range, 56.0–65.5). The median time between the transplant and the diagnosis of the malignancy was 69 months (range, 40.0–116.5). There were 11 renal cell carcinomas (RCC; 11/25; 44%), 8 in native kidney and 3 in renal allograft; 9 prostate cancers (PCa; 9/25; 36%), 8 localized and 1 metastatic; and 5 transitional cell carcinomas (TCC; 5/25; 20%), 3 in bladder and 2 in renal allograft pelvis. Treatments performed were similar to those used in the nontransplanted population. RCC were treated with radical nephrectomy when affecting the native kidney, partial nephrectomy when affecting the allograft, or immunotherapy when metastatic. Patients with localized PCa were treated with radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or androgenic deprivation if there were comorbidities, and those metastatic with hormonal deprivation. Bladder TCCs were treated with transurethral resection or radical cystectomy. Pelvis TCCs affecting the allograft were treated with radical nephroureterectomy of the allograft including bladder cuff and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Conclusions

There exists an increased incidence of urologic tumors in kidney transplant recipients. Conventional treatments of these tumors are technically feasible. The risk of developing these tumors remains even in the long term. Because of their suitability for curative treatments, it is advisable to perform periodic screening for urologic cancers to achieve an early diagnosis.     

Lymphoproliferative disorder presenting as a tumor of the renal allograft

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLDs) constitute a group of potentially life-threatening complications in solid organ transplantation, occurring in 1–2% of kidney transplant recipients. The absolute number of cases occurring at each transplant center remains small, making it difficult to assess incidence, prognosis, and treatment. We report a case of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder that developed in the allograft renal parenchyma 2 years after renal transplantation. This case implies that partial nephrectomy may be a safe and effective treatment protocol for renal lymphoma in allograft kidneys.