Quality of life after kidney transplantation. A prospective, randomized comparison of cyclosporine and conventional immunosuppressive therapy

The aim of this research is to compare the quality of life after kidney transplantation for patients treated with cyclosporine versus conventional immunosuppressive therapy. This evaluation assumes particular importance given the high cost of cyclosporine, the resistance of the government to cover these costs, and the absence in some series (including this one) of significant differences in patient and kidney survival. This study is based on a randomized, stratified, prospective trial and concentrates on nondiabetic patients from ages 19 to 56 at 1-year posttransplant. Patients on cyclosporine show significant advantages in physical, emotional, and social well-being. Differences for 5 out of 10 indicators of quality of life were significant at the P less than or equal to .05 level. Significant differences are found on health satisfaction, happiness measures, indices of overall life satisfaction and well-being, perceived adjustment of the family, and female (not male) vocational rehabilitation. The fewer number of episodes of rejection and infection are, in part, responsible for these advantages in quality of life for cyclosporine patients.     

Tacrolimus in induction immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplantation: comparison with cyclosporine

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction immunosuppression therapies based on tacrolimus or cyclosporine (CsA) in kidney transplantation. The 240 kidney allograft recipients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n=94) received tacrolimus (.01 mg/kg per day), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 2 g/d), and steroids (30 mg/d); and group 2 (n=146) CsA (6 mg/kg per day), MMF (2 g/d), and steroids (30 mg/d). Antilymphocyte serum was administered in cases of acute tubular necrosis. The acute rejection rate was higher among group 2 (30.6%) compared with group 1 patients (12.2%) (P=.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, body surface area, serologic virus markers (in donor and recipient), baseline creatinine levels, cause of death, HLA incompatibilities, response to acute tubular necrosis, and number of dialysis sessions. We conclude that both immunosuppressive regimens are effective and safe in kidney transplantation. The survival rates of patients and grafts were similar, but the incidence and degree of acute rejection events were reduced in group 1; this finding may forecast a decreased incidence of chronic renal allograft nephropathy.     

A comparison of discharge immunosuppressive drug regimens in primary cadaveric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Finding the best combination of immunosuppression is an important challenge in kidney transplantation. Current short-term (1- and 3-year) allograft survival is quite good, making it difficult to determine differences in therapeutic regimens without large sample sizes. Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, the current study provides substantial statistical power to analyze the outcomes for different immunosuppressive regimens. METHODS: To compare the effects of four discharge regimens (cyclosporine and azathioprine [CYA+AZA], CYA and mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], tacrolimus [TAC]+AZA, and TAC+MMF) on long-term survival, a multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted on 19246 primary cadaveric kidney transplants during 1995 to 1998. RESULTS: Compared with CYA+AZA, the combination of CYA+MMF was associated with a 10% reduced risk of graft loss (relative risk [RR] 0.90, 95% confidence limit [CL] 0.84-0.96, P<0.001), whereas TAC+AZA was associated with an 18% reduced risk (RR 0.82, 95% CL 0.67-1.005, P=0.06) and TAC+MMF with a 20% reduced risk of graft loss (RR 0.80, 95% CL 0.71-0.89, P<0.001). All three regimens benefited patients regardless of delayed graft function (DGF) or early acute rejection status. In addition, in the absence of DGF, the combinations of CYA+MMF, TAC+AZA, and TAC+MMF were associated with a reduced risk of mortality compared with CYA+AZA. CONCLUSIONS: The major finding of this study was improved graft and patient survival associated with TAC+MMF and CYA+MMF in patients with or without DGF or early acute rejection.     

Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in cardiac transplant recipients: a comparison with cyclosporine neoral

This study compares the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (TAC) and cyclosporine Neoral (CsA) in cardiac transplant recipients. METHODS: Twenty-six de novo cardiac recipients were prospectively and randomly assigned to receive oral TAC- or CsA-based regimens after 5 to 6 days of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction. Blood samples were collected at 0 (before the dose) and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, as well as 12 hours after drug administration. The pharmacokinetics of the first dose (PK-1) and at steady state (PK-S, 1 month after transplantation) were analyzed. RESULTS: Comparing the AUC per milligram dose, there was no significant difference between PK-1 and PK-S among TAC (46.0 +/- 24.3 ng x h/mg x mL versus 69.0 +/- 43.9 ng x h/mg x mL, P = .15 by paired t-test), but a significant difference in CsA (25.2 +/- 11.4 ng x h/mg x mL versus 45.4 +/- 12.9 ng x h/mg x mL, P = .0005 by paired t-test). This means better TAC absorption in the early post-heart transplant period. Using a single-point blood level to predict AUC, TAC showed a significantly higher correlation than CsA at all corresponding sampling times. Besides, C12 in both PK-1 and PK-S of TAC displayed good correlations to the AUC (r2 = .895, P = .00 in PK-1 and r2 = .81, P = .00 in PK-S). The TAC trough level was accurate enough to predict the AUC. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic profile of TAC is more reliable than that of CsA in the early post-heart transplant period. A high correlation of trough blood levels with AUC omits the requirement for a multiple sampling strategy to more accurately measure AUC as is needed with CsA.     

他克莫司与环孢素A在尸肾移植中应用的长期疗效和安全性比较

目的　比较他克莫司 (FK5 0 6 )和环孢素A(CsA)在尸肾移植中应用的长期疗效和安全性。方法　 2 10例尸肾移植患者分为FK5 0 6组和CsA组 ,随访 12～ 32个月 ,观察两个组血药浓度变化、急性排斥和慢性排斥反应发生率、人 /肾 1年存活率、血肌酐、肝功能、血糖及血脂水平、药物不良反应、感染发生率以及FK5 0 6逆转顽固性急性排斥反应的效果。结果　血中FK5 0 6和CsA浓度谷值的变化趋势基本相同。FK5 0 6组与CsA组相比 ,急、慢性排斥反应发生率明显降低 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;肝功能异常发生率、高脂血症和牙龈增生发生率以及术后 3个月血肌酐水平均明显降低 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;高血糖和震颤发生率明显升高 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;感染发生率及人 /肾 1年存活率的差异无显著性。结论　与CsA相比 ,FK5 0 6是一种更高效的免疫抑制剂 ,长期使用可以有效降低肾移植后急、慢性排斥反应的发生率 ,有利于移植肾功能的恢复。     

An open, randomized, multicenter clinical trial of oral tacrolimus in liver allograft transplantation: a comparison of dual vs. triple drug therapy.

Triple therapy combining an anticalcineurin agent, corticosteroids, and azathioprine (AZA) in liver transplantation has been frequently applied, particularly in Europe. Debates have arisen concerning the use of a third drug (AZA), mainly in patients receiving tacrolimus (TAC). An open-label, multicenter, prospective, and randomized trial was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of TAC and corticosteroids (dual therapy [D]) vs. TAC, corticosteroids, and AZA (triple therapy [T]) in liver transplantation. A total of 180 patients were randomized, 92 in D and 88 in T group. Patients were followed during 3 months for efficacy and safety and up to 24 months for patient and graft survival assessments. The rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was higher in D than in T group (40.7% vs. 24.4%; P = 0.021). A higher incidence of positive HCV status in D group (55.6% vs. 40.7%; P = 0.049) may explain this difference, since significantly more patients of this HCV subpopulation experienced acute rejection when treated with D therapy (48% vs. 20%; P = 0.008). No treatment differences were apparent for HCV-negative patients. The 24-month graft survival tended to be inferior in T group, 69.8% vs. 75.8% (P = 0.283). Similar results were observed regarding patient survival at the same time point, with values of 72.9% vs. 76.9% (P = 0.573), favoring D group. Both regimens showed comparable safety profiles with the exception of hematological abnormalities, which were more frequently observed in T group. In conclusion, both regimens were shown to be effective although increased toxicity and a trend towards a lower graft and patient survival were observed in T group.     

A randomized trial of the immunosuppressive efficacy of vincristine in cardiac transplantation

We evaluated the efficacy of the addition of the lymphoblasticidal agent vincristine to standard immunosuppression in heart transplantation in a prospective randomized study of 92 patients (46 to receive and 46 to not receive vincristine) with a follow-up period of 12 months. Patients received either equine antithymocyte globulin for the first week or OKT3 monoclonal antibody (OKT3) for the first 10 or 14 days after transplantation. Six to eight doses of vincristine were given over 9-12 weeks, beginning 2 days after completion of ATG or OKT3. The number of rejection episodes in the first six months posttransplantation, the percentage of patients corticosteroid maintenance-free at one year, cumulative immunosuppressive drug doses, deaths, infections, and neuropathy were followed. The addition of vincristine resulted in more patients achieving corticosteroid maintenance-free status at one year (vincristine 68%, no vincristine 38%, P = 0.01). In comparing patients at relatively high risk for rejection (those younger than 55 years and all females) with those at relatively low risk (males older than 55 years), only the high-risk vincristine-treated patients showed significantly fewer rejection episodes and a higher corticosteroid maintenance status at one year (66% vs. 32%, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in survival (vincristine 96%, no vincristine 98%), infection, or amounts of other immunosuppressive agents used. The major side effect was neuropathy, which occurred more frequently in the vincristine-treated group (43% vs. 18%, P less than .001). We conclude that vincristine acts as an immunosuppressive agent in cardiac transplantation, particularly in patients at higher risk for rejection.     

Results of lis2t, a multicenter, randomized study comparing cyclosporine microemulsion with C2 monitoring and tacrolimus with C0 monitoring in de novo liver transplantation

This is the first multicenter, randomized, open-label study to compare the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine A microemulsion (CsA-ME) (Neoral, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland ) with C2 monitoring versus tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients. Patients were stratified according to hepatitis C virus status and randomized to receive CsA-ME (n= 250) or tacrolimus (n= 245) with steroids, with or without azathioprine. The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included death or graft loss and safety evaluations at 6 months. The incidence of BPAR at 3 months was 26% in the CsA-ME group and 24% in the tacrolimus group (not significant). At 6 months, 89% of patients receiving CsA-ME and 88% of patients receiving tacrolimus were alive with a functioning graft. Among the hepatitis C virus-positive patients, there was no difference in BPAR, but death or graft loss was more frequent in those receiving tacrolimus (15% vs. 6%, P <0.05). Diabetes mellitus (14% vs. 7%, P <0.02) and diarrhea (29% vs. 14%, P <0.001) were significantly more often reported in patients receiving tacrolimus. The incidence of hypertension was similar in both groups. At 6 months, the median total cholesterol was 4.7 mmol/L (2.9-7.4 mmol/L) in the CsA-ME arm versus 4.3 mmol/L (2.5-6.4 mmol/L) in the tacrolimus arm; the median serum creatinine was 106 micromol/L (52-238 micromol/L) in the CsA-ME arm versus 103 micromol/L (44-477 micromol/L) in the tacrolimus arm. Efficacy is equivalent with CsA-ME using C2 monitoring or tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients. The incidence of adverse events is comparable except for a significantly higher incidence of diabetes mellitus and diarrhea in the tacrolimus group. Both agents are effective primary immunosuppressants in liver transplant recipients.     

Serum cholesterol changes in long-term survivors of liver transplantation: a comparison between cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy.

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term effect of tacrolimus and cyclosporine therapies on serum cholesterol levels in liver transplant recipients. We retrospectively studied 127 consecutive adult liver transplant recipients who survived for at least 1 year after transplantation. Basal immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine plus prednisone in 100 patients and tacrolimus plus prednisone in 27 patients. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as a fasting serum cholesterol level greater than 220 mg/dL. Mean follow-up was 39 months. No statistical significance was found between cyclosporine- and tacrolimus-treated patients regarding age, sex, diagnosis, and previous cholesterol levels; both groups were similar. Significantly more tacrolimus-treated patients were steroid free in the first and second year of follow-up (tacrolimus, 37% and 63%; cyclosporine, 13% and 32%, respectively; P <.01). In the third year of follow-up, this difference was not significant (77% v 56%). The overall incidence of hypercholesterolemia was 34.6% (44 patients). At the end of the study, hypercholesterolemia was found in 24 of 51 and 14 of 70 patients with and without steroids, respectively (P <.002). Also, mean cholesterol levels were 224 +/- 70 and 191 +/- 48 mg/dL before and after steroid withdrawal, respectively, P <.001. Hypercholesterolemia was found in 43.7% of the patients during cyclosporine plus prednisone therapy compared with 46.1% of the patients during tacrolimus plus prednisone therapy (P <.9). Greater mean cholesterol levels were found in the cyclosporine group, particularly in the second and third years of follow-up (P <.01). Hypercholesterolemia was found in 22% of the patients during cyclosporine monotherapy compared with 15% during tacrolimus monotherapy (P <.5). No differences were found in mean cholesterol levels during follow-up when both monotherapy groups were compared. In conclusion, a lower incidence of hypercholesterolemia was achieved in tacrolimus-treated patients, mainly when steroids were still part of the immunosuppressive treatment.     

Structural skeletal impairment induced by immunosuppressive therapy in rats: cyclosporine A vs tacrolimus

The exact role of immunosuppressive drugs in the development of osteoporosis and pathologic fractures frequently reported in patients following organ transplantation is still not known. In two experiments, the effects of immunosuppressive drugs were studied on growing rats allocated randomly into five groups of eight rats each which received either FK506 (1.5 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg) or cyclosporine A (15 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg) for 28 days by daily oral gavage. In experiment I ( n=40), bone mineral content (BMC) of the femur by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bone ash weight were measured. In experiment II ( n=40), stereologic measurements of decalcified tibiae were carried out. The BMC and ash weight values of the whole femur were significantly lower both in the low- and high-dose FK506 groups as well as in the high-dose CsA group. Decalcified sections showed lower volume density of trabecular bone of the tibial metaphysis in both CsA-treated groups and in the high-dose FK506 group. Furthermore, the volume density of the hypertrophic zone volume of the growth plate was higher in high-dose CsA-treated rats. Our data demonstrate that both CsA and FK506 have adverse effects on bone and that high doses of CsA or FK506 alter both cortical and trabecular bone with subsequent osteopenia. In addition, CsA-treated groups showed histological changes in some aspect resembling rickets/osteomalacia.