Changes in the prolactin response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) during the menstrual cycle of normal women.

Serum prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin (TSH) levels were measured after iv administration of 200 microng of synthetic thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) in 20 normal women ages 18 to 34. Ten women received TRH on days 7 to 8 of the menstrual cycle and 10 women received TRH on days 21-22. Although there was no difference in the dose of TRH relative to body weight in the two groups of women, the peak PRL level after TRH stimulation was greater in the women studied on day 21-22 (48.5+/-5.7 ng/ml, mean+/-SE) than on day 7-8 (35.2+/-4.2 ng/ml) of the cycle (P less than 0.05). In contrast, TSH rose to a greater degree in the preovulatory phase (13.8+/-1.8 micronU/ml) than the luteal phase (7.7+/-0.7 micronU/ml of the cycle (P less than .01). Studies of the PRL and TSH response after TRH administration should take the phase of the menstrual cycle into account.     

Metoclopramide increases prolactin release and milk secretion in puerperium without stimulating the secretion of thyrotropin and thyroid hormones

To explore the effect of metoclopramide (MC) on the secretion of PRL, TSH, and thyroid hormones (T3 and T4) and on defective lactation, 17 mothers with poor lactation were treated with oral MC (10 mg. three times daily) for 3 weeks starting 18-141 days post partum. After a pause of 1 week, the medication was given for a further 2 weeks. The breast milk yield was monitored objectively before and during the trial. Furthermore, iv stimulation tests with MC (10 mg) and TRH (200 microgram) were done before and at the end of oral MC therapies. Oral MC increased the mean (+/-SEM) plasma PRL level from 36.6 +/- 9.2 to 90.6 +/- 7.5 ng/ml (P less than 0.001) after 1 week, and the PRL level remained elevated for as long as MC was administered. During the pause, the PRL level decreased to 19.5 +/- 7.5 ng/ml, but increased once again during the second MC treatment to 85.5 +/- 16.0 ng/ml (P less than 0.01). Plasma TSH, T3, and T4 did not change. The PRL level rose significantly after TRH and MC injections before and during oral treatments with MC, whereas the TSH concentrations were elevated only after TRH stimulation. The PRL response to iv MC or TRH and the TSH response to iv TRH were not affected by oral MC treatment. The mean daily milk volume increased from 433 +/- 55 to 626 +/- 75 ml (P less than 0.001) during the first treatment and from 390 +/- 73 to 606 +/- 56 ml (P less than 0.01) during the second oral MC treatment. Correspondingly, the volume of daily supplemental alimentation decreased from 348 +/- 61 to 280 +/- 59 ml (P less than 0.05) and from 526 +/- 68 to 363 +/- 66 ml (P less than 0.01), respectively. MC caused no significant side effects.     

Effects of disodium EDTA and calcium infusion on prolactin and thyrotropin responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in healthy man

To determine the impact of induced hypo- and hypercalcemia on TRH (400 micrograms)-stimulated TSH and PRL release, healthy subjects (n = 11) were infused with 5% glucose in water (n = 11), disodium EDTA (n = 11), or calcium gluconate (n = 7). TRH was given as an iv bolus 60 min (5% glucose and EDTA) and 120 min (calcium) after initiation of the respective infusion. Basal plasma concentrations of TSH remained unchanged during induced hypo- and hypercalcemia, whereas those of PRL fell during the latter (P less than 0.05). The mean sum of increments (0-90 min) in PRL and TSH was considerably greater during hypocalcemia than during hypercalcemia (PRL, P less than 0.002; TSH, P less than 0.005). The increments in the plasma hormone concentration above basal after iv TRH were increased compared to those in normocalcemia (PRL, 98.4 +/- 37.9 ng/ml; TSH, 38.9 +/- 11.8 microU/ml) during hypocalcemia [PRL, 128 +/- 47.8 ng/ml (P less than 0.002); TSH, 46.7 +/- 12.8 microU/ml; (P less than 0.005)], but were impaired during hypercalcemia [PRL, 70.1 +/- 27 ng/ml (P less than 0.002); TSH, 28.9 +/- 8.5 microU/ml (P less than 0.025)]. The mean sum of increments in PRL was related to concentrations of both serum calcium (r = -0.59; P less than 0.01) and PTH (r = 0.51; P less than 0.05). A relation was also seen between the incremental responses of TSH and serum calcium (r = -0.52; P less than 0.05), PTH (r = 0.55; P less than 0.01), and phosphorus (r = -0.55; P less than 0.01). We conclude that in healthy man, TRH-mediated release of both PRL and TSH are inversely related to serum calcium concentrations in such a manner that hormone secretion is enhanced by acute hypocalcemia, but blunted by hypercalcemia.     

The relationship of changes in serum estradiol and progesterone during the menstrual cycle to the thyrotropin and prolactin responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone.

The responses of serum TSH and PRL to TRH (500 microgram) were studied in normal young women in the early follicular, periovulatory, and midluteal phases of the menstrual cycle in order to examine the relationship of these responses to the levels of estradiol relationship of these responses to the levels of estradiol (E2) and progesterone. Each woman was studied twice in each phase in order to assess intraindividual variability. There was no significant difference in either the TSH or PRL responses among the phases of the menstrual cycle nor was either response affected by the periovulatory rise in E2 or by the luteal rise in both E2 and progesterone. Thus, the interpretation of the TSH and PRL responses to TRH in normal women is not affected by the menstrual cycle although both responses are greater in women that in men. Both the peak TSH and peak PRL after TRH were highly correlated with the basal levels of TSH (r = 0.85; P less than 0.01) and PRL (r = 0.67; P less than 0.01), respectively, indicating that the TSH and PRL responses to TRH in women are directly proportionate to the basal levels of the respective hormones, as previously shown for the TSH response in men. The mean intraindividual variability (coefficient of variation) of the TSH response to TRH was 18%, but ranged as high as 56%, while that of the PRL response was 16% and ranged up to 31%; variability was not affected by the phase of the menstrual cycle. The normal range of the peak TSH after TRH in women is 7-33 microU/ml (mean +/- 2 SD); however, because of the variability, a normal woman may sometimes have a peak TSH after TRH as low as 4 microU/ml. Repeating the test will result in a normal value if the woman is truly normal. Similarly, the normal peak PRL after TRH in women is 22-111 ng/ml (mean +/- 2 SD); usually, however, the lower limit is 30 ng/ml with lower values due to intraindividual variation. The data suggest that the higher average level of E2 in women compared to women, but that the cyclic changes in serum E2 or progesterone in women have little or no additional effect.     

Dopamine affects basal and augmented pituitary hormone secretion.

Although the role of the neurotransmitter, dopamine (DA), in the regulation of PRL has been well documented, controversy exists regarding its participation in the regulation of the other pituitary hormones. Consequently, we infused DA into six healthy male subjects (ages 19-32) and studied its effects on both basal pituitary hormone levels and augmented hormonal release induced by insulin hypoglycemia (ITT), TRH, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). DA alone produced a modest though significant increase in GH concentration from 2.2 +/- 0.5 to 11.9 +/- 3.7 ng/ml (P less than 0.05) by 60 min, but the peak incremental GH response to ITT was significantly inhibited by DA (43.5 +/- 5.0 vs. 16.3 +/- 3.3 ng/ml; P less than 0.01). PRL concentrations fell during the DA infusion (20.4 +/- 3.0 to 10.6 +/- 1.5 ng/ml; P less than 0.02) at 235 min, and the PRL responses to both ITT and TRH were completely abolished. Although the basal LH and FSH concentrations were unaffected by DA, the incremental LH response to GnRH was inhibited (45.5 +/- 10.6 to 24.4 +/- 5.4 mIU/ml; P less than 0.05), while the FSH response was unchanged. DA significantly reduced the basal TSH concentration from 3.9 +/- 0.2 to 2.5 +/- 0.2 micro U/ml (P less than 0.01) at 230 min and blunted the peak incremental TSH response to TRH (6.0 +/- 1.5 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.9 microU/ml; P less than 0.01). DA had no effect on basal cortisol levels, the cortisol response to ITT, basal plasma glucose, or the degree of hypoglycemia after ITT. Our data provide new evidence that DA has an inhibitory as well as a stimulatory role in the regulation of GH secretion in normal humans. It inhibits centrally as well as peripherally mediated PRL secretion and blunts the LH response to GnRH. In addition, DA lowers both basal and TRH-mediated TSH release, confirming the reports of other investigators.     

MATERNAL SERUM PROLACTIN AND ITS RESPONSE TO TRH IN NORMAL AND COMPLICATED EARLY PREGNANCY

Maternal serum prolactin levels (PRL) were measured by radioimmunoassay in thirty-four women with either normal or complicated early pregnancy. The basal PRL level (mean +/- S.D.) of 33.4 +/- 16.4 ng/ml in normal pregnancy (n = 15) was similar to the level of 32.7 +/- 18.8 ng/ml in threatened abortion (n = 11) and 32.8 +/- 16.9 ng/ml in hyperemesis gravidarum (n = 8). Two patients, one with blighted ovum and the other with subsequent spontaneous abortion, demonstrated PRL levels lower than the range of 20-63 ng/ml in the control group. The PRL response to 200 microgram of synthetic thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) administered intravenously was similar throughout the patient groups. The basal level of PRL in the whole series was more closely related to the level of serum oestradiol (r = 0.778, P less than 0.001) than to that of serum progesterone (r = 0.442, P less than 0.05). However the increments of PRL following TRH administration did not correlate with either oestradiol or progesterone.     

Decreased growth hormone (GH) response to oral clonidine in endemic cretinism: effect of L-T3 therapy

As GH secretion is dependent upon thyroid hormone availability, the GH responses to clonidine (150 micrograms/m2) and the TSH and PRL response to TRH were studied in eight endemic (EC) cretins (3 hypothyroid, 5 with a low thyroid reserve) before and after 4 days of 100 micrograms of L-T3. Five normal controls (N) were also treated in similar conditions. Both groups presented a marked increase in serum T3 after therapy (N = 515 +/- 89 ng/dl; EC = 647 +/- 149 ng/dl) followed by a decrease in basal and peak TSH response to TRH. However, in the EC patients an increase in serum T4 levels and in basal PRL and peak PRL response to TRH after L-T3 therapy was observed. One hypothyroid EC had a markedly elevated PRL peak response to TRH (330 ng/dl). There were no significant changes in basal or peak GH values to treatment with L-T3 in normal subjects. In the EC group the mean basal plasma GH (2.3 +/- 1.9 ng/ml) significantly rose to 8.8 +/- 3.2 ng/ml and the mean peak response to clonidine (12.7 +/- 7.7 ng/ml) increased to 36.9 +/- 3.1 ng/ml after L-T3. Plasma SM-C levels significantly increased in N from 1.79 +/- 0.50 U/ml to 2.42 +/- 0.40 U/ml after L-T3 (p less than 0.01) and this latter value was significantly higher (p less than 0.05) than mean Sm-C levels attained after L-T3 in the EC group (respectively: 1.14 +/- 0.59 and 1.78 +/- 0.68 U/ml). These data indicate that in EC the impaired GH response to a central nervous system mediated stimulus, the relatively low plasma Sm-C concentrations, and the presence of clinical or subclinical hypothyroidism may contribute to the severity of growth retardation present in this syndrome.     

THE INTERRELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PROLACTIN AND THYROTROPHIN SECRETION FOLLOWING DOPAMINERGIC BLOCKAGE IN PATIENTS WITH MILD HYPERPROLACTINAEMIA WITHOUT ANY DEMONSTRABLE PITUITARY TUMOUR

PRL, TSH and gonadotrophin responses to the dopaminergic antagonist, metoclopramide, were studied in mildly hyperprolactinaemic patients with normal sella radiology and CT scan. Eleven female patients with basal PRL levels ranging from 23 to 124 ng/ml were challenged with intravenous metoclopramide (10 mg) and on subsequent occasions with TRH (200 micrograms) and LHRH (100 micrograms). On the basis of the PRL secretory pattern following metoclopramide and TRH stimulation, the patients were divided into two groups. Group I comprised six subjects who were PRL non-responsive to TRH and metoclopramide. Group II (five subjects) demonstrated PRL responses to TRH and metoclopramide indistinguishable from female controls. Mean +/- SD basal PRL levels were 68.5 +/- 29.9 ng/ml in Group I and not different in Group II (40.6 +/- 12.0 ng/ml). Basal LH levels were increased in Group II, whereas FSH was increased in Group I. Basal TSH levels were lower in Group I than the controls. Following metoclopramide, Group I patients had an increase in TSH from a basal of 2.4 +/- 0.7 microU/ml to a peak of 5.9 +/- 2.7 microU/ml (P less than 0.005) which occurred at 30 min. TSH values were increased above basal at all time intervals following metoclopramide. In contrast, TSH levels did not change in Group II patients or the controls after metoclopramide administration. Both patient groups had TSH responses to TRH similar to the controls. Following LHRH, the LH increase was greater in Group II and the FSH in Group I. In neither group nor the controls did gonadotrophin levels change after metoclopramide. In Group II females, PRL responsiveness to metoclopramide was associated with TSH non-responsiveness. In Group I females, PRL levels failed to rise, whereas TSH increased. The PRL and TSH profile in Group I females is typical of a prolactinoma. It is concluded that PRL as well as TSH determinations following metoclopramide are useful indices in the assessment of hyperprolactinaemia and may be of value in differentiating the functional state from that of a pituitary tumour.     

Does bromocriptine block thyrotropin-releasing hormone-induced prolactin release during pregnancy?

PRL responses to 200 microgram of iv TRH were measured in 16 healthy women with normal early pregnancy before and at the endo of bromocriptine treatment of 5.0--7.5 mg daily for 1--2 weeks. Before the start of bromocriptine, TRH caused a PRL elevation from 19.1 +/- 2.2 to 95.2 +/- 12.6 ng/ml (mean +/- SE) after 20 min, with a mean maximal PRL increment of 71.7 +/- 11.6 ng/ml. Bromocriptine suppressed basal plasma PRL level to 3.6 +/- 0.8 ng/ml (P less than 0.001). TRH then caused a PRL rise to 18.8 +/- 1.8 ng/ml at 20 min, with a mean maximal PRL increment of 15.7 +/- 1.8 ng/ml. The absolute PRL response was significantly smaller (P less than 0.001) during bromocriptine intake than before, whereas the mean percent increments in PRL levels after TRH administration were similar in the presence and absence of bromocriptine. Fifteen of these women were restudied with TRH stimulation 4--6 weeks after legal abortion, and the PRL responses to TRH were normal. When 7 of these women were once again treated with bromocriptine and retested with TRH, no absolute or relative PRL response to TRH emerged. These results release differs between the pregnant and nonpregnant states.     

EFFECT OF LOW-DOSE DOPAMINE INFUSION ON BASAL AND STIMULATED TSH AND PROLACTIN CONCENTRATIONS IN MAN

Dopamine (DA) infused at pharmacological doses in man inhibits thyrotrophin (TSH) secretion, although the physiological significance of this observation is unclear. The effect of low-dose DA infusion (0.1 microgram/kg/min) on TSH and prolactin (PRL) concentrations during stimulation with thyrotrophin releasing hormone (TRH) in normal male subjects is reported. Six subjects were given intravenous DA or placebo infusions for 165 min on separate days. A bolus of TRH (7.5 micrograms) was given at + 90 min, followed by infusion of the tripeptide (750 ng/min) for 45 min during both DA and placebo studies. In all subjects TRH administration caused a small rise in TSH which was partially inhibited by DA (peak 5.73 +/- 0.85 mU/l vs 4.58 +/- 1.09, P less than 0.05). PRL response to TRH was almost totally inhibited by DA (620 +/- 164 mU/l vs 234 +/- 96, P less than 0.05); integrated TSH and PRL responses to TRH were similarly inhibited by DA. Circulating plasma DA concentration during infusion of the catecholamine was 3.46 +/- 1.00 ng/ml, which is within the range reported in pituitary stalk plasma of other species. These data support the hypothesis that DA is a physiological modulator of TSH secretion in normal man. Major differences in the time course of TSH and PRL responses to TRH, and in the suppressive effect of DA on these responses suggest that there are fundamental differences in stimulus-secretion coupling for TRH and the lactotroph and thyrotroph.     

Effect of chronic endogenous hypercalcemia on prolactin and thyrotropin responsiveness in man

To investigate whether chronic endogenous hypercalcemia influences TSH and/or PRL release from pituitary thyrotrophs and lactotrophs in man, 10 patients with endogenous hypercalcemia, due either to cancer or to primary hyperparathyroidism, were injected with 25 micrograms TRH iv. The TSH and PRL responses were compared with those obtained in an age-, sex-, and weight-matched group of patients comprised of 10 normocalcemic individuals with other diseases. The mean maximal TSH response in the hypercalcemic group (3.7 +/- 0.4 microU/ml) was 46% lower than in the normocalcemic group (6.8 +/- 1.2 microU/ml; p less than 0.02). Similarly, the mean maximal PRL response was 45% lower in the hypercalcemic (31 +/- 5 ng/ml) than in the normocalcemic patients (57 +/- 9 ng/ml; p less than 0.05). Feasible mechanisms behind this inhibitory influence of chronic endogenous hypercalcemia on TSH and PRL responsiveness are discussed.     

Thyrotropin (TSH)-releasing hormone-stimulated TSH release and TSH concentration in the guinea pig pituitary, as determined by a heterologous radioimmunoassay

Little is known regarding how the guinea pig (GP) compares with the rat in terms of TSH economy. To develop a heterologous RIA for GP TSH, rabbits were injected with GP TSH. In one rabbit (anti-gpTSH-8), antibodies that bound 125I-labeled bovine (b) TSH and rat (r) TSH but not 125I-labeled bLH or rPRL were generated. The binding of anti-gpTSH-8 to [125I]bTSH was inhibited in a parallel manner by bTSH over a range of 0.047-5.42 ng, rTSH over a range of 0.24-25 ng, and dilutions of GP pituitary extracts. This system, with bTSH as the standard, was employed as the basis for a heterologous TSH RIA (GP TSH RIA). The cross-reactions of rTSH and bLH in the GP TSH RIA were 45% and 7%, respectively. Rat and bovine FSH, GH, and PRL had little or no cross-reaction. GP pituitaries were incubated in vitro and dosed with LHRH and TRH. The GP TSH RIA detected an 11-fold increase in TSH in the medium in response to TRH and no change in immunoreactivity in response to LHRH. In contrast, a RIA for bLH detected a 25-fold increase in LH in the medium in response to LHRH and no increase in response to TRH. The TSH content in GP pituitaries was significantly lower than that in the rat (GP, 16.8 +/- 1.6 ng/mg; rat, 80.3 +/- 6.2 ng/mg; P less than 0.05) as were serum TSH concentrations (GP, 0.8 +/- 0.4 ng/ml; rat, 4.5 +/- 1.1 ng/ml; P less than 0.05). Thyroid hormone administration (T4 Rx) in both GP and rat produced a significant reduction in pituitary TSH content (GP control, 4.8 +/- 0.4 ng/mg; T4 Rx, 2.1 ng/mg; P less than 0.05; rat control, 52.4 +/- 4.0 ng/mg; T4 Rx, 20.5 +/- 1.6 ng/mg; P less than 0.05) and TSH release (GP control, 9.4 +/- 2.3 ng/ml; T4 Rx, 4.3 +/- 1.5 ng/ml; P less than 0.05; rat control, 357 +/- 81 ng/ml; T4 Rx, 133 +/- 27 ng/ml; P less than 0.05) from incubated hemipituitaries. Thyroidectomy in the rat was associated with a decrease in pituitary TSH content, but no change in pituitary content was found in thyroidectomized GPs. These studies demonstrate the feasibility of estimating GP TSH with a heterologous RIA that employs polyvalent antiserum against GP TSH as the first antibody and bTSH as the tracer and standard.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Effect of gestational mastectomy on postpartum gonadotropin releasing hormone and thyrotropin releasing hormone-induced luteinizing hormone and prolactin response in first lactation Holstein cattle

First lactation Holstein cows were divided into two treatment groups to evaluate thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH, 0.25 microgram/kg body weight) and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH; 200 micrograms) induced secretion of prolactin (PRL) and luteinizing hormone (LH) on days 7 and 16 postpartum. Disregarding treatment, LH response was greater (p less than 0.01) on day 16 than day 7 postpartum (7.5 +/- 0.3 ng/ml on day 7 vs 10.2 +/- 0.3 ng/ml serum on day 16). Mastectomized cattle had similar time for initiation of LH increase, but peak concentrations were achieved later. Peak PRL concentrations were reached 12 to 15 min after injection and returned to baseline within 2.5 h in both groups. However, intact cows had higher (p less than 0.01) mean serum PRL than the mastectomized cows for 1 h following injection. Peak PRL concentration was 83.3 +/- 17.6 ng/ml for mastectomized cows vs 128.0 +/- 24.7 ng/ml for intact cows. It appears that udder removal allows for greater pituitary responsiveness to GnRH but diminishes PRL response to TRH suggesting the mammary gland differentially affects pituitary secretion of LH and PRL.     

Evidence for a synergistic effect of somatostatin on vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-induced prolactin release in the rat: comparison with its effect on thyrotropin (TSH)-releasing hormone-stimulated TSH release

The present experiments were carried out to clarify the role of endogenous somatostatin (SRIF) in the regulation of PRL and TSH release. The effects of electrical stimulation of the hypothalamic periventricular nucleus (PE) on vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP)-induced PRL and TRH-stimulated TSH secretion were studied using pentobarbital-anesthetized male rats bearing indwelling cannulae in the right atria. The animals were implanted in the PE with bipolar concentric stimulating electrodes 1 week before the experiments began. The effects of a bolus injection or a continuous infusion of SRIF-14 (iv, 7.6 or 10 nmol/100 g BW, respectively) on the PRL or TSH release induced by VIP or TRH were also examined. Electrical stimulation of the PE significantly enhanced VIP-induced PRL release 19 min after the bolus injection of VIP (from 29.3 +/- 7.2 to 59.7 +/- 14.9 ng/ml, P less than 0.05). A bolus injection of SRIF had a similar effect and increased the PRL response to VIP (from 29.3 +/- 7.2 to 114.7 +/- 22.4 ng/ml, P less than 0.01). Continuous infusion of SRIF did not decrease the stimulatory effect of VIP on PRL release; on the contrary it significantly increased the PRL response to a first VIP injection (10 min after the onset of SRIF-14 infusion) over that observed after a second administration of VIP. Neither electrical stimulation of the PE nor the bolus SRIF-14 injection modified basal PRL secretion. Electrical stimulation of the PE slightly but significantly increased the TSH response to a bolus injection of TRH, but had no effect on the basal TSH release. In contrast, both the bolus injection and the continuous infusion of SRIF-14 significantly and persistently inhibited the TRH-stimulated TSH release. These results suggest that 1) SRIF does not inhibit VIP-induced PRL secretion in vivo but rather enhances it through some unknown mechanism; 2) SRIF inhibits TRH-stimulated TSH secretion.     

The relationship of androgen to the thyrotropin and prolactin responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in hypogonadal and normal men

Fluoxymesterone, an androgen not converted to estrogen, caused a significant decrease in the TSH response to TRH in 11 men with primary hypogonadism [maximum change in TSH: before treatment, 11.3 +/- microU/ml (mean +/- SE); 8.9 +/- 1.0 after 2 weeks (P less than 0.001); 8.2 +/- 1.1 after 6 weeks (P less than 0.01)]. There was a significant fall in serum T4-binding globulin (TBG) (measured directly by RIA) without a change in the free T4 or free T3 index. Fluoxymesterone had no effect on the PRL response to TRH in hypogonadal men. The results suggest that 1) androgen per se is at least partly responsible for the lower TSH response to TRH in men compared to women and 2) androgen is not a cause of the lower PRL response to TRH in men.     

Thyrotropin suppression by 3,5-dimethyl-3'-isopropyl-L-thyronine in man.

The thyromimetic activity of 3,5-dimethyl-3'-isopropyl-L-thyronine (DIMIT), a nonhalogenated thyroid analog, was studied in adult men using suppression of TRH-induced TSH release to assess this activity. In nine men, aged 30-58 yr, the TSH increment after 500 microgram TRH iv was compared to the TSH response to TRH 24 h after oral administration of 1 mg DIMIT. Eight euthyroid subjects had normal baseline TSH levels of 1.5 +/- 0.2 (SE) microunit/ml that fell significantly to 0.7 +/- 0.2 microunit/ml 24 h after DIMIT (P less than 0.005). Their TSH increments after TRH fell from 15.3 +/- 2.8 to 6.7 +/- 1.6 microunit/ml 24 h after DIMIT (P less than 0.001). One subject with probable Hashimoto's thyroditis had an elevated TSH of 18 microunit/ml, with an exaggerated TSH response to TRH of 72 microunit/ml. His basal TSH fell to 7.6 and his TSH increment fell to 14.3 microunit/ml 24 h after DIMIT. The suppression of TSH was relatively prolonged. In four subjects, the TSH response to TRH was still blunted from 5-12 days after DIMIT. In one subject, the TSH increment returned to normal 15 days after DIMIT. DIMIT had no significant effect on PRL secretion. There was no evidence of toxicity in patients receiving DIMIT. DIMIT has effective thyromimetic activity in man, as shown by its significant and prolonged suppression of TSH secretion.     

The influence of long-term low dose thyrotropin-releasing hormone infusions on serum thyrotropin and prolactin concentrations in man

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate in man the relative thyrotroph and lactotroph response to a 48-h low dose constant TRH infusion. Before, during, and after the 75 ng/min TRH constant infusion, serum samples were obtained every 4 h in six euthyroid ambulating male subjects for measurements of TSH, PRL, T4, and T3. The TSH response, employing a specific and sensitive human TSH RIA, demonstrated a significant rise from the mean basal pre-TRH value of 2.35 +/- 0.64 microU/ml (+/- SEM) to 3.68 +/- 0.80 (P < 0.005) during the TRH infusion; this value fell below the basal level to 1.79 +/- 0.47 (P < 0.05) post infusion. Serum T4 values were increased above basal both during (P < 0.025) and after (P < 0.025) TRH infusion, whereas serum T3 values were not significantly changed throughout the entire study period. The daily TSH nocturnal surge was augmented in both absolute and relative terms during the first 24 h or the TRH infusion, unchanged during the second 24 h of infusion, and inhibited during the first postinfusion day. Other than a minimal increase in serum PRL during the first few hours of the infusion, no significant alteration in the mean basal concentration or circadian pattern of PRL secretion was evident during or after the low dose TRH infusion. These findings would indicate that 1) near-physiological stimulation of the pituitary with TRH produces a greater stimulation of TSH release than of PRL release and 2) the factor or factors producing the circadian TSH surge may not be mediated through fluctuations in endogenous TRH.     

Prolactin secretion in acromegalic patients before and after selective adenomectomy

PRL secretion before and after transsphenoidal adenomectomy was studied in 13 patients with acromegaly. Six patient had elevated basal serum PRL levels before surgery, while 7 patients had normal levels. In every patient, the basal serum GH level decreased to less than 5.0 ng/ml after surgery. In the group (group A) with high basal serum PRL levels (mean +/- SD, 41.3 +/- 5.8 ng/ml) before surgery, the PRL levels decreased significantly (P less than 0.0002) to less than 10.0 ng/ml (4.8 +/- 3.6 ng/ml) after the operation. However, in the group (group B) with normal levels (10.8 +/- 4.4 ng/ml) before surgery, PRL levels changed little (7.8 +/- 3.1 ng/ml) after the operation. In group A, the increment of PRL after TRH injection decreased or disappeared (P less than 0.02; 4.1 +/- 2.4 ng/ml) after surgery compared with that before surgery (39.2 +/- 25.9 ng/ml). On the other hand, in group B, the increment of PRL after TRH injection was nearly unchanged (17.1 +/- 7.0 ng/ml) after surgery compared with that before surgery (19.3 +/- 8.0 ng/ml). The results indicate that PRL is secreted from the pituitary adenoma in acromegalic patients with hyperprolactinemia, while PRL secretion from the normal part of the pituitary gland is decreased.     

Effects of calcium channel blockade with verapamil on the prolactin responses to TRH, L-dopa, and bromocriptine.

To determine the mechanisms by which calcium channel blockade with verapamil causes hyperprolactinemia, the authors investigated the effects of this blockade on the prolactin (PRL) responses to stimulation by thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) and inhibition by dopamine, using L-dopa and bromocriptine. Verapamil, given for 1 week at a dosage of 240 mg orally to eight healthy volunteers, induced a significant elevation of basal PRL levels (17.3 +/- 1.8 ng/ml to 30.9 +/- 4.3 ng/ml, p < 0.005). Verapamil also caused an increase in the PRL response to a TRH (100 micrograms). However, when the increased basal level was considered by calculating the area under the THR response curve and subtracting the basal values, this increase (1763.4 +/- 202.6 ng/ml.min to 2260.6 +/- 223.9 ng/ml.min) was not found to be statistically significant (p > 0.05). Verapamil had no effect on the basal or TRH-stimulated thyroid stimulating hormone levels. In these same volunteers, PRL levels decreased from 13.2 +/- 2.5 ng/ml to a nadir of 5.5 +/- 1.6 ng/ml in response to L-dopa. After 1 week of verapamil 240 mg, basal PRL levels were elevated to 21.5 +/- 3.1 ng/ml, then decreased to 8.2 +/- 1.8 ng/ml with L-dopa. The percentage decreased in PRL in response to L-dopa (60 +/- 5% versus 62 +/- 3%) were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Verapamil had no effect on the basal or L-dopa-stimulated growth hormone levels. Bromocriptine 2.5 mg given to five volunteers twice daily caused PRL levels to fall from 13.3 +/- 1.6 ng/ml to 5.0 +/- 0.9 ng/ml.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Interaction of L-dopa and GHRH on GH secretion in normal men

To determine how L-dopa stimulates GH secretion, we investigated its interaction with GHRH in vivo. Six normal men were studied on 4 occasions: 1) L-dopa-TRH: 500 mg L-dopa orally followed by 200 micrograms TRH 60 min later; 2) L-dopa-GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH 1-44 iv 30 min after L-dopa followed by 200 micrograms TRH iv; 3) GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH iv at 0 min, 30 min later 200 micrograms TRH iv; 4) TRH test: 200 micrograms TRH iv as a bolus. After L-dopa-TRH GH-levels increased significantly from 0.6 micrograms/l to 25.8 +/- 9.6 (SE) micrograms/l at 60 min. Only a slight TSH and no PRL increase was observed after L-dopa-TRH. After L-dopa-GHRH-TRH the GH-increase was significantly higher (45.7 +/- 11.1 micrograms/l) compared to L-dopa-TRH alone. GHRH-TRH increased GH-levels to 52.5 +/- 12.1 micrograms/l, which was not significantly different from the GH-levels obtained when L-dopa-GHRH-TRH were given. TRH increased serum TSH and PRL to 6.3 +/- 0.7 microU/ml and 715 +/- 136 microU/ml, respectively, which was significantly higher compared to the TSH responses after L-dopa-TRH. The PRL and TSH increase after TRH only was also higher (TSH-max: 5.7 +/- 0.5 microU/ml; PRL-max: 899 +/- 154 microU/ml) compared to the TSH and PRL responses after L-dopa-TRH. Our results show that the combination of L-dopa with GHRH leads to the same GH response as GHRH only. However, both responses are significantly higher than the one after L-dopa alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)