Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.

OBJECTIVES: Reoperation is a relatively common event in patients with prosthetic heart valves, but its actual occurrence can vary widely from one patient to another. With a focus on bioprosthetic valves, this study examines risk factors for reoperation in a large patient cohort. METHODS: Patients (N=3233) who underwent a total of 3633 operations for aortic (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) between 1970 and 2002 were prospectively followed (total 21,179 patient-years; mean 6.6+/-5.0 years; maximum 32.4 years). The incidence of prosthetic valve reoperation and the impact of patient- and valve-related variables were determined with actual and actuarial methods. RESULTS: Fifteen-year actual freedom from all-cause reoperation was 94.1% for aortic mechanical valves, 61.4% for aortic bioprosthetic valves, 94.8% for mitral mechanical valves, and 63.3% for mitral bioprosthetic valves. In both aortic and mitral positions, current bioprosthesis models had significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses (15-year reoperation odds-ratio 0.11+/-0.04; P<0.01 for aortic, and 0.42+/-0.14; P=0.009 for mitral). Current bioprostheses were significantly more durable in the aortic position than in the mitral position (14.3+/-6.8% more freedom from 15-year reoperation; (P=0.018)). Older age was protective, but smoking was an independent risk factor for reoperation after bioprosthetic AVR and MVR (hazard ratio for smoking 2.58 and 1.78, respectively). In patients with aortic bioprostheses, persistent left ventricular hypertrophy at follow-up and smaller prosthesis size predicted an increased incidence of reoperation, while this was not observed in patients with mitral bioprostheses. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate that current bioprostheses have significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses, reveal a detrimental impact for smoking after AVR and MVR, and indicate an increased reoperation risk in patients with a small aortic bioprosthesis or with persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after AVR.     

Elderly valve replacement with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Comparison by composites of complications

AIM: The goal of aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery in the elderly (= or >75 years) is to extend survival and minimize valve-related morbidity, mortality and reoperation. As the elderly population lives longer, those with implanted valves are at risk of suffering valve related complications. We hypothesize that bioprostheses are appropriate for the elderly. METHODS: The follow-up evaluation of 966 patients with valves (AVR, 666; mitral valve replacements [MVR], 226; multiple valve replacements [MR], 74) implanted between 1975 and 1999 was examined. There were 879 bioprotheses (BP) and 87 mechanical prostheses (MP). The mean age was 78.9+/-3.3 years (range 75-94.6 years). Concomitant coronary artery bypass was performed in AVR in 51.7%, MVR in 50.4% and MR in 28.4%. Valve type, valve lesion, coronary artery bypass (previous/concomitant), age and gender were considered as independent predictors of composites and survival. The total follow-up was 3905 patient-years. RESULTS: Early mortality was for AVR 9.6% (64), MVR 15.0% (34) and MR 25.7% (19). The late mortality was for AVR 8.8%, MVR 10.4% and MR 8.8%/patient-year. The only independent predictor of survival and valve-related mortality, morbidity and reoperation was age for survival in those with AVR, hazard ratio 1.15 [CL 1.03-1.27] p=0.0094). The BP reoperative rate was 0.5%/patient-year (reoperation was fatal in 6/15) of total, MP reoperative rate was 0% [reasons for reoperation structural valve deterioration (4), non-structural dysfunction (6), prosthetic valve endocarditis (5), reoperation fatality due to non-structural dysfunction (2), prosthetic valve endocarditis (4)]. Overall patient survival at 10 and 15 years, respectively, was 30.5+/-2.4% and 3.6+/-2.2% irrespective of valve position and type. Overall actual and actuarial freedom from valve-related morbidity at 15 years was 96.8+/-0.9% and 93.7+/-2.3%, respectively. Actual and actuarial overall freedom from valve-related mortality at 15 years was 84.3+/-2.4% and 58.4+/-0.9%, respectively. Overall actual and actuarial freedom from valve related reoperation at 15 years was 95.8+/-1.6% and 74.8+/-16.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BP valves are further confirmed to be a good option for AVR in patients = or >75 years of age.     

Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.

OBJECTIVE: The current trend towards decreasing the age for selection of a tissue over a mechanical prosthesis has led to a dilemma for patients aged 50-65 years. This cohort study examines the long-term outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves in middle-aged patients. METHODS: Patients (N = 659) aged between 50 and 65 years who had first-time aortic valve replacement (AVR) and/or mitral valve replacement (MVR) with contemporary prostheses were followed prospectively after surgery. The total follow-up was 3,402 patient-years (mean 5.1 +/- 4.1 years; maximum 18.3 years). Outcomes were examined with multivariate actuarial methods. A composite outcome of major adverse prosthesis-related events (MAPE) was defined as the occurrence of reoperation, endocarditis, major bleeding, or thromboembolism. RESULTS: Ten-year survival was 73.2 +/- 4.2% after mechanical AVR, 75.1 +/- 12.6% after bioprosthetic AVR, 74.1 +/- 4.6% after mechanical MVR, and 77.9 +/- 7.4% after bioprosthetic MVR (P=NS). Ten-year reoperation rates were 35.4% and 21.3% with aortic and mitral bioprostheses, respectively. Major bleeding occurred more often following mechanical MVR (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2, 9.0; P = 0.022), and the incidence of any thromboembolic event was more common after mechanical MVR (HR: 4.7; CI 1.4, 13.3; P = 0.01). Overall freedom from MAPE at 10 years was 70.2 +/- 4.1% for mechanical AVR patients, 41.0+/-30.3% for bioprosthetic AVR patients, 53.3 +/- 8.8% for mechanical MVR patients, and 61.2 +/- 9.2% for bioprosthetic MVR patients. Although a trend existed towards more MAPE amongst middle-age patients with tissue valves, multivariate analysis did not identify the presence of a bioprosthesis as an independent risk factor for MAPE (HR: 1.3; CI 0.9, 2.0; P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: In middle-aged patients, MAPE may occur more often in patients with bioprosthetic valves, but definitive conclusions necessitate the accumulation of additional follow-up. At present, these data do not support lowering the usual cutoff for implantation of a tissue valve below the age of 65.     

Heart Valve Replacement with the Hancock Bioprosthesis: A 6-Year Review

All patients who had a mitral or aortic Hancock valve replacement between June, 1974, and June, 1979, were reviewed. A total of 734 bioprostheses were implanted in 632 patients: 291 had mitral (MVR), 239 had aortic (AVR), and 102 had both mitral and aortic valve replacement (MVR + AVR). In 228 patients, an associated surgical procedure was necessary. It involved conservative valve operation in 205 of them. The hospital mortality was 9.6% (28) for MVR (11.5% with associated operation), 4.6% (11) for AVR (8.7% with associated operation), and 13.7% (14) for MVR + AVR (13.0% with associated operation).The follow-up period was between 1 and 6 years with a total follow-up of 934.6, 714.6, and 288.3 patient-years for MVR, AVR, and MVR + AVR, respectively. The late mortality was 0.96% (9), 1.53% (11), and 2.08% (6) per patient-year for MVR, AVR, and MVR + AVR, respectively. The thromboembolic rate was 1.49%, 0.14%, and 2.08% per patient-year for MVR, AVR, and MVR + AVR, respectively. There were twelve valve failures (six were due to rupture; four, thrombosis; one, insufficiency because of intrinsic failure; and one, stenosis without evident cause at reoperation). This represents a failure rate of 0.53%, 0.13%, and 2.08% per patient-year for MVR, AVR, and MVR + AVR, respectively. These results encourage us to continue our routine use of the glutaraldehyde xenografts as the safest valve substitute at present.     

Long-term durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis following combined mitral and aortic valve replacement: an 11-year experience

Long-term evaluation of patients undergoing combined mitral and aortic valve replacement (MVR + AVR) with a porcine bioprosthesis provides the opportunity for a direct comparison of the durability of the mitral versus the aortic porcine bioprosthesis in the same patient. From 1970 to 1983, 71 patients underwent MVR + AVR with Hancock porcine bioprostheses. There were 46 men an 25 women ranging in age from 21 to 64 years (mean, 47.5 +/- 5 years). Sixteen patients (22.5%) died at operation. The survivors were followed from 0.2 to 11.5 years (mean, 5.7 +/- 3 years). Duration of follow-up was 313 patient-years and was 100% complete. Overall late mortality was 6.7 +/- 1.4% per patient-year (linearized incidence), and actuarial survival was 54.2 +/- 8% at 11 years. Endocarditis occurred in 4 patients (linearized incidence of 1.3 +/- 0.6% per patient-year); thromboembolic events were sustained by 4 patients (linearized incidence of 1.3 +/- 0.6% per patient-year); the event was fatal in 1 patient. Actuarial freedom from thromboembolism was 90 +/- 4.8% at 11 years. Reoperation for primary tissue failure was performed in 11 patients (linearized incidence of 3.5 +/- 1% per patient-year) with no deaths; in 7 patients both bioprostheses were explanted, and in 4, only the mitral bioprosthesis was replaced. The durability of explanted aortic and mitral porcine bioprostheses was not significantly different, and the evaluation of seven pairs of explanted aortic and mitral bioprostheses showed similar amounts of calcification. Actuarial freedom from reoperation because of primary tissue failure was 44.6 +/- 13.7% at 11 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the multiple impacts of valve replacement on the lives of young adults. METHODS: Patients (N=500) between age 18 and 50 who had aortic valve replacement (AVR) and/or mitral valve replacement (MVR) with contemporary prostheses were followed annually. Events, functional status, and quality of life were examined with regression models. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 7.1+/-5.3 years (maximum 26.7 years). Five, 10, and 15-year survival was 92.7+/-1.7, 88.3+/-2.4 and 80.1+/-4.7% after AVR, and 93.1+/-2.3, 79.5+/-4.3 and 71.5+/-5.4% after MVR, respectively. Survival decreased with concomitant coronary disease (hazard ratio (HR): 4.5) and preoperative LV grade (HR: 2.0/grade increase) in AVR patients, and with atrial fibrillation (HR: 5.5), coronary disease (HR: 5.7), preoperative left atrial diameter (HR: 3.0/cm increase) and NYHA class (HR: 2.1/class increase) in MVR patients. Despite reoperation, late survival was equivalent between bioprostheses and mechanical valves in both implant positions. The ten-year cumulative incidence of embolic stroke was 6.3+/-2.4% for mechanical AVR patients, 6.4+/-2.9% for bioprosthetic AVR patients, 12.7+/-3.9% for mechanical MVR patients, and 3.1+/-3.1% for bioprosthetic MVR patients. Atrial fibrillation (HR: 2.8) and smoking (HR: 4.0) were risk factors for stroke in MVR patients. In AVR patients, SF-12 physical scores, freedom from recurrent heart failure, and freedom from disability were significantly higher in bioprosthetic than mechanical valve patients. Career or income limitations were more often subjectively linked to a mechanical prosthesis in both implant positions. CONCLUSIONS: Late outcomes of modern prosthetic valves in young adults remain suboptimal. Bioprostheses deserve consideration in the aortic position, as mechanical valves are associated with lower physical capacity, a higher prevalence of disability, and poorer disease perception. Early surgical referral and atrial fibrillation surgery may improve survival after MVR.     

A six-year study of the Omniscience valve in four Canadian centers

Stimulated by the recent controversy over the Omniscience valve, we conducted a follow-up study on 413 hospital survivors in whom this prosthesis was implanted at four Canadian centers from 1979 to 1985. One hundred forty-seven underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR), 203 had mitral valve replacement (MVR), 10 had tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) and 53 underwent multiple valve replacement (45 AVR + MVR, 5 MVR + TVR, and 3 AVR + MVR + TVR). The mean age was 50.8 +/- 13 years (range, 2 months to 75 years). Follow-up of 96% was achieved for a mean of 2.6 years and a maximum of 6 years with a total of 1,076 patient-years. Complications were defined and graded according to severity. Analyses were performed to yield linearized and actuarial rates for complications. There were 30 late deaths (2.8% per patient-year). At 5 years, the actuarial survival was 89 +/- 3% (AVR, 89 +/- 3% and MVR, 91 +/- 3%). Percentages for freedom from each complication are as follows: endocarditis, 96 +/- 1% (AVR, 96 +/- 2% and MVR, 98 +/- 1%); periprosthetic leak, 99 +/- 0.6% (AVR, 98 +/- 1% and MVR, 99 +/- 0.6%); thrombotic complications, 87 +/- 3% (AVR, 84 +/- 6% and MVR, 90 +/- 3%); valve thrombosis 99.4% (AVR and MVR, 100%); anti-coagulant-related hemorrhage, 94 +/- 2% (AVR, 97 +/- 2% and MVR, 94 +/- 2%); and all valve-related complications, 77 +/- 3% (AVR, 77 +/- 6% and MVR, 79 +/- 4%). Reoperation was required at the rate of 1.2% per patient-year.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term experience with porcine aortic valve xenografts

Between 1971 and 1975, glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine aortic valve xenografts were employed for isolated replacement of the mitral valve (MVR) in 243 patients, replacement of the aortic valve (AVR) in 167 patients, and double valve replacement (AVR and MVR) in 51 patients. Postoperatively, long-term anticoagulation was not routinely given. Operative mortality rates for AVR, MVR, and double valve groups were 7.8, 6.0, and 11.8 per cent, respectively; the majority of early postoperative deaths were associated with concomitant coronary artery disease. No death was attributable to xenograft dysfunction. Follow-up of all patients was obtained. The total duration of follow-up for the MVR group was 347 patient-years, for the AVR GROUP 148 148 patient-years, and for double valve replacement 37 patient-years; maximum follow-up for these three groups was 4.4, 4.0, and 2.4 years, respectively. Actuarial analysis of postoperative survival rates at a common interval of 3 years showed 78 per cent for MVR patients, 91 per cent for AVR patients, and 80 per cent (projected) for patients with double valve replacement (85, 96, and 91 per cent for operative survivors, respectively. At this same interval 92 per cent of MVR patients, 99 per cent of AVR patients, and 93 per cent (projected) of patients with double valve replacement were free of thromboembolic episodes. Altogether, 12 of the total 512 valves implanted exhibited some evidence of dysfunction during the entire period of follow-up evaluation, but in only 2 instances (both mitral) was intrinsic pathological involvement of the xenograft tissue documented. Actuarial analysis of xenograft dysfunction at a common interval of 3 years after operation showed 95 per cent of MVR patients, 98 per cent of AVR patients, and 97 per cent (projected) of patients with double valve replacement to be free of this complication. These data support the use of glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine xenografts as superior bioprostheses that pose a low risk of thromboembolism without anticoagulation. The over-all durability of such valves, within the restriction of a maximum current follow-up interval of 4.4 years, appears comparable to that of currently available mechanical prostheses and justifies continued clinical use.     

Durability and low thrombogenicity of the St. Jude Medical valve at 5-year follow-up

Between November, 1978, and December, 1983, 736 patients had valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. There were 478 patients with aortic valve replacement (AVR), 188 with mitral valve replacement (MVR), 63 with double valve replacement, and 7 with tricuspid valve replacement (they were not included in this study). The mean age at the time of operation was 46.7 years for patients having AVR and 48.6 years for those having MVR and AVR + MVR. Follow-up totaled 1,116 patient-years (range, 4 to 82 months). Early (30-day) mortality was lowest for isolated MVR (2.3%) and AVR (3.7%), and increased with reoperation or when associated procedures were combined with valve replacement. Patients undergoing reoperation or having associated procedures made up 49% of the AVR and 54% of the MVR groups. All patients were advised of the need for long-term anticoagulation with warfarin sodium. Nine patients (7 with AVR, 1 with MVR, 1 with AVR + MVR) had suspected or confirmed episodes of systemic thromboembolism, a linearized incidence of 0.99% per patient-year for AVR, 0.36% per patient-year for MVR, and 0.98% per patient-year for AVR + MVR. Eight patients with AVR underwent reoperation for prosthetic valve endocarditis (5 of the 8 patients had endocarditis prior to initial valve replacement). There were no instances of structural valve failure. There were 37 late deaths. Actuarial survival at 5 years (excluding early mortality, 95% confidence limits) was 89.8% for AVR, 84.8% for MVR, and 95.2% for AVR + MVR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term results of mechanical valves in aortic position and biological valves in mitral and tricuspid positions

The long-term results of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a mechanical valve (AM), mitral valve replacement with a biological valve (MB), and tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) with a biological valve (TB) operated upon from 1977 to 1988 were retrospectively analysed. A total of 899 patients received 1117 valves (381 AM, 633 TB, 103 TB) with a follow-up 3778 patient-years and 4582 valve-years. A significant incidence of thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and endocarditis was not found among AVR, MVR, TVR, or multiple valve replacement. We found a significantly decreased incidence of survival rate in multiple valve replacement compared with AVR or MVR, and a significantly increased incidence of reoperation in MB compared with AM and TB. We use AM and TB in any adult patients as a first choice. However, we prefer a mechanical valve in the mitral position except in patients over 65 years old, who have a short life expectancy, in whom anticoagulation is thought to be difficult, and who desire a biological valve.     

Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts: follow-up of up to 6 years

The results of valve replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft compare favorably with results obtained with other bioprostheses. From March, 1977, to July, 1983, 497 Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves were implanted in 463 patients at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. There were 292 patients who had aortic valve replacement (AVR), 140 with mitral valve replacement (MVR), 28 with double valve replacement, and 3 with triple valve replacement. The survivors were followed regularly. Actuarial analysis of late results indicates an expected survival of 71% at 6 years for patients who underwent AVR and 72% at 3 years for patients who had MVR. The only valve-related deaths were due to endocarditis, which occurred at a rate of 3.9% per patient-year for aortic valves and 0.6% per patient-year for mitral valves. Despite a low usage of formal anticoagulation, embolic complications occurred at a rate of 1.4% per patient-year for aortic valves and 4.0% per patient-year for mitral valves. Five valves were removed for intrinsic failure after 36 to 72 months of follow-up. New York Heart Association Functional Class improved an average of 1.28 classes per patient.     

Experience with the Carpentier-Edwards Porcine Valve Prosthesis in 700 Patients

The Carpentier-Edwards porcine valve prosthesis has afforded our patients a satisfactory quality of life and a low incidence of valve-related complications at follow-up periods of up to five years. From December, 1975 to March, 1980, 768 prostheses were implanted in 700 patients (aortic valve replacement [AVR], 334; mitral valve replacement [MVR], 292; tricuspid valve replacement [TVR], 6; and multiple valve replacement, 68). One hundred and thirty-seven patients (19.6%) had had previous cardiac operations. Concomitant aortocoronary bypass was performed in 127 patients (18.1%). There were 52 hospital deaths, for a mortality of 7.4% (AVR, 4.8%; MVR, 9.2%; multiple valve replacement, 11.8%). Total follow-up was 1,047 patient-years (range, 6 to 60 months, mean, 19.4 months). There were 33 late deaths (AVR, 1.7% per patient-year; MVR, 4.0% per patient-year; multiple valve replacement, 8.1% per patient-year). Eight percent of AVR patients and 47% of MVR and multiple valve replacement patients were taking anticoagulants. The valve-related complications (expressed as events per 100 patient-years) were as follows: (1) thromboembolism (AVR, 0.94; MVR, 1.42; multiple valve replacement, 4.62); (2) infective endocarditis (AVR, 0.94; MVR, 0.24; multiple valve replacement, 2.31); (3) periprosthetic leak (AVR, 0.94; MVR, 0.71; multiple valve replacement, 3.46); and (4) valve dysfunction (MVR, 0.24). The only case of valve dysfunction was a calcified mitral prosthesis in a 13-year-old girl. Actuarial survival, including operative deaths, was as follows: AVR, 90.5% at 36 months; MVR, 84% at 36 months; and multiple valve replacement, 74% at 24 months. Of surviving patients, 93.6% were in New York Heart Association Class I or II at follow-up evaluation.     

Ten-year experience with the porcine bioprosthetic valve: interrelationship of valve survival and patient survival in 1,050 valve replacements

The porcine bioprosthetic valve was used in 440 patients having isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR), 522 patients having isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), and 88 patients having MVR + AVR between 1974 and 1981. Patients with associated surgical procedures were excluded. Mean follow-up was 8.3 years. At 10 years, there was no difference in patient survival between those having AVR and those having MVR. Reoperations were performed on 192 patients. Endocarditis was the reason for reoperation in 3.7% of patients who had MVR and 10.6% of those who had AVR. Structural valve degeneration was the reason for reoperation in 89.7% of MVR patients and 78.8% of AVR patients (p = 0.04). Hospital mortality among patients having valve reoperations was 4.7%. At 10 years, the freedom from valve reoperation for all causes and from structural valve degeneration was significantly better for the AVR group than the MVR group (74% +/- 3% versus 61% +/- 4%, p = 0.004; and 79% +/- 3% versus 63% +/- 4%, p = 0.0006, respectively). For patients in their 60s, the 10-year freedom from reoperation was 92% +/- 2% for AVR and 80% +/- 6% for MVR (p = not significant). At 10 years, freedom from cardiac-related death and valve reoperation was best for both MVR and AVR patients in their 60s. Patients 70 years old or older rarely had reoperation but died before valve failure occurred. The 10-year freedom from all major valve-related events (cardiac-related death, reoperation, thromboembolism, endocarditis, and anticoagulant-related bleeding) was practically the same for both MVR and AVR patients (48% +/- 3% versus 49% +/- 3%, respectively). The porcine bioprosthetic valve is the valve of choice only for patients 60 years old or older. Patients in their 70s have an extremely low rate of reoperation but a high rate of cardiac-related death and do not outlive the prostheses.     

Clinical experience with omniscience and omnicarbon prosthetic heart valves

Omniscience valves were implanted in sixty-two patients. Twenty-eight of these patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR), 15 had mitral valve replacement (MVR) and 8 had aortic and mitral valve replacement (DVR). Post-operative events occurred in nine (5.9%/patient year) of the AVR group, in three (1.7%/patient year) of the MVR group and in three (5.4%/patient year) of the DVR group. The actuarial freedom from all events at five years in the AVR, MVR and DVR was 74 +/- 8%, 88 +/- 6%, 67 +/- 16%, respectively. Cardiac death occurred in four (2.5%/patient year) of the AVR, one (0.6%/patient year) of the MVR and two (3.6%/patient year) of the DVR. The freedom at five years in the AVR, MVR and DVR was 88 +/- 6%, 96 +/- 4%, and 77 +/- 14%, respectively. Valve-related complications were noted in four patients. Post-operative cerebral hemorrhage was seen in three of the AVR. Maximum opening angle of the Omniscience valve was 39.1 +/- 4.5 degrees at the aortic position and 44.6 +/- 9.7 degrees at the mitral position. Omnicarbon valves implanted in ninety-five patients, fifty-eight of these patients underwent AVR, 24 had MVR and 13 had DVR. Events occurred post-operatively in four (2.6%/patient year) of the AVR group, in three (12.2%/patient year) of the MVR group, but in none of the DVR group. The freedom at five years was 89 +/- 6% in the AVR and 84 +/- 8% at three years in the MVR. Post-operative cardiac death occurred in one (0.7%/patient year) of the AVR and in two (8.1%/patient year) of the MVR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: a comparison of late results in 1,593 patients

From 1976 to 1988, 1,593 patients underwent valve replacement with a porcine (878 patients) or a pericardial bioprosthesis (715 patients). There were 701 aortic, 678 mitral, and 214 multiple-valve replacements. Follow-up was obtained for 1,559 patients (98%). Early mortality was 9% (79 patients) in the porcine valve group and 5% (37 patients) among patients with a pericardial valve (p less than 0.01). Late survival after replacement with porcine valves was 80% +/- 1% and 62% +/- 3% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. With pericardial valves, 5-year survival was 79% +/- 2%. Among valve-related complications, rates of freedom from thromboembolism, endocarditis, and hemorrhage after 6 years were similar for both valve groups. Freedom from reoperation at 6 years was also similar after aortic (96% versus 91%) or multiple-valve replacement (95% versus 88%). However, for mitral valve replacement, freedom from reoperation was significantly better with porcine valves than with pericardial valves at 6 years (92% versus 68%; p less than 0.001). This difference was mainly due to the Ionescu-Shiley valve, which accounted for 83% of primary tissue failures among pericardial bioprostheses implanted in the mitral position (10/12 patients). After 6 years, freedom from primary tissue failure of mitral valves was 92% +/- 2% with porcine and 70% +/- 11% with pericardial bioprostheses (p less than 0.0001). The degree of clinical improvement among survivors was similar with both valve types. Thus, in the aortic position, pericardial valves compare with porcine valves up to 6 years, whereas in the mitral position, the durability of the former is significantly less, mainly because of the suboptimal performance of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis.     

Early clinical experience with the On-X prosthetic heart valve

The study aimed to assess the performance of the On-X valve (Medical Carbon Research Institute, Austin, TX). Between December 2000 and January 2003 On-X valves were implanted in 400 patients aged 19-85 years (mean: 55.6+/-16), 290 males and 210 females. There were 120 cases of aortic valve replacement (AVR), 258 mitral valve replacement (MVR) and 22 combined aortic and mitral valve replacement (DVR). Additional procedures were performed in 144 patients. Patients were followed up prospectively at 3- to 6-month intervals. Mean follow-up was 38.4+/-11.8 months (maximum 55.6 months). Overall hospital mortality was 3.5%. Freedom from adverse events at 4 years in the study were as follows: thromboembolism, 99.1% for AVR, 98.3% for MVR and 94.7% for DVR patients; thrombosis, 100% for AVR, 99.2% for MVR and 94.7% for DVR; bleeding events, 99.1% for AVR, 99.2% for MVR and 88.8% for DVR; prosthetic endocarditis, 98.2% for AVR, 99.2% for MVR and 94.7% for DVR. Overall survival at 4 years was 92+/-1%. At echocardiographical examination within 1 year of the AVR, the mean aortic valve gradient was 12.8+/-6, 10.3+/-3, 9.0+/-4, 8.3+/-3, and 6.2+/-3 mmHg for 19, 21, 23, 25, 27/29 mm valve sizes, respectively. MVR mean gradient was 4.9+/-2, 4.5+/-1.2 and 4.0+/-0.8 mmHg for 25, 27/29, 31/33 mm valve sizes, respectively. On-X valve is a highly effective mechanical valve substitute with low morbidity and mortality and good functional results.     

The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions.

Between 1983 and 1987 the Mitroflow pericardial prosthesis was implanted in 354 patients, ranging in age from 14 to 94 years (mean 60.1 years). The early mortality was 5.7% and the late mortality 2.9% per patient-year. The total cumulative follow-up was 853 years (mean 2.4 years). Patient survival at 4 years for aortic valve replacement (AVR) was 81.5% and for mitral valve replacement (MVR) 74.8%. The overall rate of valve-related complications was 4.8% per patient-year (41 complications): thromboembolism, 15; hemorrhage related to antithromboembolic therapy, 1; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 15; nonstructural dysfunction, 3; and structural valve deterioration, 7. At 4 years the freedom from thromboembolism was 91.5% +/- 2.7% for AVR and 91.1% +/- 4.0% for MVR, from prosthetic valve endocarditis 93.5% +/- 2.3% for AVR and 94.0% +/- 2.9% for MVR, from structural valve deterioration 97.3% +/- 2.1% for AVR and 92.6% +/- 3.2% for MVR, from valve-related mortality 96.9% +/- 1.4% for AVR and 97.5% +/- 1.8% for MVR, and from reoperation 93.5% +/- 2.8% for AVR and 83.1% +/- 5.1% for MVR. The freedom from the composite of all valve-related complications at 4 years was 81.1% +/- 4.2% for AVR and 75.3% +/- 2.8% for MVR. The Mitroflow valve has provided satisfactory clinical performance at the 4-year evaluation. Structural valve deterioration is greater in the mitral position than in the aortic position. Long-term evaluation of the Mitroflow valve is necessary to determine the impact of structural valve deterioration on its clinical performance.     

The Medtronic-Hall cardiac valve: 7 1/2 years' clinical experience

Clinical information on the Medtronic-Hall valve prosthesis was obtained by reviewing the records of 379 patients, 164 of whom had aortic valve replacement (AVR), 163 of whom had mitral valve replacement (MVR), and 52 of whom had double valve replacement over 90 months (1,225 patient-years) (mean follow-up, 42.01 +/- 1.3 months [+/- standard error]). Mean age was 53.8 +/- 12 years. One hundred ninety-three patients (50.9%) had some type of concomitant operation, such as tricuspid annuloplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, or resection of ascending aortic aneurysm. Ninety-one percent were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV preoperatively. Early mortality and late mortality were 7.7% (29 patients) and 13.5% (51 patients), respectively. The actuarial survival at 7 1/2 years was 74.1 +/- 2.7% for the total group and 69.0 +/- 4.5% for those having AVR, 81.0 +/- 3.2% for those having MVR, and 67.0 +/- 8.9% for those having double valve replacement. All patients but 2 were maintained on a regimen of chronic anticoagulation with warfarin sodium. Twenty-six thromboembolic episodes occurred (2.1/100 patient-years): 13 after MVR (2.3/100 patient-years), 11 after AVR (2.1/100 patient-years), and 2 after double valve replacement (1.4/100 patient-years). Four thromboembolic episodes were fatal; no valve thrombosis occurred. There were no structural failures. Of the 350 late survivors, 92% were in NYHA Functional Classes I and II. Total valve-related complications have been minimal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical and hemodynamic assessment of the Hancock II bioprosthesis.

The Hancock II bioprosthesis was used for heart valve replacement in 614 patients from 1982 to 1990. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in 376 patients, mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 195, and aortic and mitral valve replacement (DVR) in 43. The mean age was 62.7 years, and 78% of all patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV before operation. Coronary artery bypass graft was necessary in 232 patients and replacement of ascending aorta in 55. There were 31 operative deaths (AVR, 4%; MVR, 6%; DVR, 9%). Follow-up was complete in 98.5% of the patients and extended from 12 to 103 months, with a mean of 49 months. At the last follow-up, 85% of the patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II. The actuarial survival at 8 years was 79% +/- 3% for AVR, 68% +/- 4% for MVR, and 65% +/- 10% for DVR. The freedom from stroke at 8 years was 93% +/- 2% for AVR, 83% +/- 5% for MVR, and 90% +/- 5% for DVR. At the end of 8 years 96% +/- 1% of all patients were free from endocarditis, 92% +/- 1% were free from primary tissue failure, and 89% +/- 3% were free from reoperation. The actuarial freedom from valve-related death at 8 years was 98% +/- 1% for AVR, 86% +/- 5% for MVR, and 91% +/- 6% for DVR. Hemodynamic assessment was obtained by Doppler echocardiography in all operative survivors and demonstrated satisfactorily effective valve orifices and transvalvular gradients. The clinical results obtained with the Hancock II bioprosthesis have been gratifying, particularly in the aortic position. This bioprosthesis is our biological valve of choice.     

Long-term clinical results after aortic valve replacement with mechanical heart valves and mitral valve replacement with porcine valves]

Long-term clinical results of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with mechanical heart valves and mitral valve replacement (MVR) with porcine valves were analysed. Sixty-three patients received isolated AVR and 48 received isolated MVR. Sixty-eight patients with MVR including double or triple valve replacement were also added in order to evaluate the primary tissue failure (PTF). The patients with operative deaths were excluded. Survival rate at 11 years in AVR was 68 +/- 10% and 67 +/- 15% in MVR without statistical difference. At 11 years, 76 +/- 8% of the patients in AVR were free from valve-related complications in contrast with the poor result of 34 +/- 31% in MVR (p less than 0.01). Main cause of this poor result in MVR was PTF as indicated in following event free rates; 83 +/- 9% at 7 years, 61 +/- 25% at 10 years and 49 +/- 31% at 13 years. There was no statistical difference between patients of above 50 years and below 49 years in PTF. Valve-related death event free was 93 +/- 5% in AVR and 86 +/- 11% in MVR at 11 years (not significant), however, there was statistical difference in re-operation event free rate as 94 +/- 5% in AVR and 76 +/- 11% in MVR at 11 years (p less than 0.001). These results suggest that the use of porcine valves in mitral position is confined to the selected patients.