In real life,one-quarter of patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer receive chemotherapy as initial palliative therapy: a study of the Southeast Netherlands Breast Cancer Consortium

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to present initial systemic treatment choices and the outcome of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer.Patients and methodsAll the 815 consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in 2007–2009 in eight participating hospitals were identified. From the 611 patients with HR+ disease, a total of 520 patients with HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer were included. Initial palliative systemic treatment was registered. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) per initial palliative systemic therapy were obtained using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.ResultsFrom the total of 520 patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, 482 patients (93%) received any palliative systemic therapy. Patients that received initial chemotherapy (n = 116) were significantly younger, had less comorbidity, had received more prior adjuvant systemic therapy and were less likely to have bone metastasis only compared with patients that received initial endocrine therapy (n = 366). Median PFS of initial palliative chemotherapy was 5.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2–6.2] and of initial endocrine therapy 13.3 months (95% CI 11.3–15.5), with a median OS of 16.1 and 36.9 months, respectively. Initial chemotherapy was also associated with worse outcome in terms of PFS and OS after adjustment for prognostic factors.ConclusionsA high percentage of patients with HR+ disease received initial palliative chemotherapy, which was associated with worse outcome, even after adjustment of relevant prognostic factors.     

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is effective as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR: A meta-analysis from six phase III randomized controlled trials

Gefiinib and erlotinib are two similar small molecules of selective and reversible epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), which have been approved for second-line or third-line indication in previously treated advanced Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The results of comparing the EGFR-TKI with standard platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as the first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC patients with activated EGFR mutation were still controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to derive a more precise estimation of these regimens. Finally, six eligible trials involved 1,021 patients were identified. The patients receiving EGFR-TKI as front-line therapy had a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than patients treated with chemotherapy [median PFS was 9.5 versus 5.9 months; hazard ratio (HR)=0.37; 95% confidence intervals (CI)=0.27-0.52; p<0.001]. The overall response rate (ORR) of EGFR-TKI was 66.60%, whereas the ORR of chemotherapy regimen was 30.62%, which was also a statistically significant favor for EGFR-TKI [relative risk (RR)=5.68; 95% CI=3.17-10.18; p<0.001]. The overall survival (OS) was numerically longer in the patients received EGFR-TKI than patients treated by chemotherapy, although the difference did not reach a statistical significance (median OS was 30.5 vs. 23.6 months; HR=0.94; 95% CI=0.77-1.15; p=0.57). Comparing with first-line chemotherapy, treatment of EGFR-TKI achieved a statistical significantly longer PFS, higher ORR and numerically longer OS in the advanced NSCLC patients harboring activated EGFR mutations, thus, it should be the first choice in the previously untreated NSCLC patients with activated EGFR mutation.     

Is the Pretreatment Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio an Important Prognostic Parameter in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma?

BackgroundTyrosine kinase inhibitor is a standard treatment for mRCC. The NLR, an index of systemic inflammation, is associated with outcome in several cancer types. To study the association of pretreatment NLR with PFS and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with VEGF-targeted therapy.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively studied an unselected cohort of patients with mRCC, who were treated with TKIs. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were employed on PFS and OS and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analyzed clinical parameters for their prognostic relevance.ResultsA total of 100 patients with mRCC who had early progressed after first-line therapy with interferon-α were included in this retrospective multicenter study conducted at 4 centers between February 2008 and December 2011. The median of the NLR was 3.04 and patients were divided into 2 higher and lower NLR groups according to median of NLR. Median PFS was 9 versus 11 months in patients with baseline NLR > 3.04 versus ≤ 3.04 (P = .009). The median OS was 16 months versus 29 months, in patients with NLR > 3.04 versus ≤ 3.04, respectively (P = .004). In the whole group OS was independently associated with higher NLR (hazard ratio [HR], 2.406; P = .004), PFS more than 6 months (HR, 4.081; P = .0001), and sex (HR, 2.342; P = .040). On the other hand in the higher NLR group (HR, 1.107; P = .009) Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center score (HR, 3.398; P = .0001) was associated with PFS.ConclusionIn patients with mRCC treated with VEGF-targeted therapy, pretreatment NLR, the duration of PFS might be associated with OS. This should be investigated prospectively.     

哌柏西利治疗失败的晚期乳腺癌患者后续治疗生存获益分析

  目的  探讨哌柏西利治疗失败后HR+/HER-转移性乳腺癌（metastatic breast cancer,MBC）患者使用化疗或内分泌±靶向治疗生存时间及预后因素。  方法  回顾性收集2018年8月至2022年12月于天津医科大学肿瘤医院接受哌柏西利治疗但发生进展的133例晚期乳腺癌患者的临床资料、随访无进展生存时间（progression-free survival,PFS）及总生存时间（overall survival,OS）。  结果  72.2%患者接受哌柏西利治疗前曾行解救化疗,66.2%患者在解救治疗三线及以后使用哌柏西利,67.7%患者哌柏西利进展后接受化疗,69.2%患者哌柏西利进展时远处转移器官数目多于3个。内分泌±靶向治疗组和化疗组患者的中位PFS分别为3.2个月和4.9个月（P=0.017）;中位OS分别为18.2个月和21.5个月,差异具有统计学意义（P=0.019）。多因素分析结果未见影响PFS及OS的独立危险因素。  结论  真实世界中多数HR+/HER-MBC患者在哌柏西利进展后选择化疗作为解救治疗方案,但内分泌±靶向治疗的PFS、OS长于化疗组。     

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Surgical Resection Improves Survival in Patients With Early Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of resection coupled with standard chemotherapy on the survival prognosis of patients with early stage small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Patients (n=110) with mediastinal lymph node-negative SCLC were enrolled in this study. The baseline clinical data of patients with surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured by Kaplan–Meier and log-rank test analyses. Ninety-eight patients received mediastinoscopy biopsy, and pulmonary lobectomy or sublobar resection, and 67 patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy after pulmonary lobectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical intervention was associated with longer OS (median OS: 42.14 vs. 33.53 months, p=0.01) and PFS (median PFS: 25.20 vs. 13.48 months, p=0.000) compared to resection alone for all patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improvement of survival for N1 patients with stage II (median OS: 36.42 vs. 26.68 months, p=0.021). The median PFS was 19.02 m (16.08, 21.96) and 13.25 m (10.19, 16.30) (p=0.031), respectively, for patients of N1 stage who received chemotherapy and those who did not. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that age, TNM stage (N stage, not T stage), and chemotherapy were independent risk factors that might affect overall survival in patients with mediastinal lymph node-negative SCLC. These findings suggest that the application of adjuvant chemotherapy following pulmonary lobectomy is associated with improvements of survival prognoses for patients with SCLC. The combination of surgical intervention with conventional therapy should be taken into consideration as a prospective multidisciplinary regimen for early stage SCLC.     

Impacts of probiotics on the efficacies of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The relationships between the therapeutic effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the intestinal flora have attracted increasing attention. However, the effects of oral probiotics on the efficacies of ICIs used to treat non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unclear. We investigated the effects of probiotics on the efficacies of ICIs in patients treated with and without chemotherapy. We investigated patients with advanced NSCLC on ICI monotherapy or combination ICI and chemotherapy using the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Immunotherapy Database (OLCSG-ID) and the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Immunochemotherapy Database (OLCSG-ICD). In total, 927 patients (482 on ICI monotherapy, 445 on an ICI + chemotherapy) were enrolled. Most were male, of good performance status, smokers, and without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations. Probiotics were administered to 19% of patients on ICI monotherapies and 17% of those on ICIs + chemotherapy. Of the former patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the probiotics group (PFS 7.9 vs. 2.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, p < .001; OS not attained vs. 13.1 months, HR 0.45, p < .001). Among patients receiving ICI and chemotherapy, there were no significant differences in PFS between those on probiotics and not but OS was significantly better in the probiotics group (PFS 8.8 vs. 8.6 months, HR 0.89, p = .43; OS not attained vs. 22.6 months, HR 0.61, p = .03). Patients on probiotics experienced better outcomes following ICI treatment.     

Prognosis and chemosensitivity of deficient MMR phenotype in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO retrospective multicenter study

Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI) colorectal cancers (CRC) represent about 5% of metastatic CRC (mCRC). Prognosis and chemosensitivity of dMMR/MSI mCRC remain unclear. This multicenter study included consecutive patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC from 2007 to 2017. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) in a population receiving first-line chemotherapy. Associations between chemotherapy regimen and survival were evaluated using a Cox regression model and inverse of probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology in order to limit potential biases. Overall, 342 patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC were included. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) on first-line chemotherapy were 6.0 and 26.3 months, respectively. For second-line chemotherapy, median PFS and OS were 4.4 and 21.6 months. Longer PFS (8.1 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.0405) and OS (35.1 vs. 24.4 months, p = 0.0747) were observed for irinotecan-based chemotherapy compared to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The association was no longer statistically significant using IPTW methodology. In multivariable analysis, anti-VEGF as compared to anti-EGFR was associated with a trend to longer OS (HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.00–3.19, p = 0.0518), whatever the backbone chemotherapy used. Our study shows that dMMR/MSI mCRC patients experienced short PFS with first-line chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy. OS was not different according to the chemotherapy regimen used, but a trend to better OS was observed with anti-VEGF. Our study provides some historical results concerning chemotherapy in dMMR/MSI mCRC in light of the recent nonrandomized trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors.     

Combination of chemotherapy and gefitinib as first‐line treatment for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and sensitive EGFR mutations: A randomized controlled trial

To explore the optimal treatment strategy for patients who harbor sensitive EGFR mutations, a head‐to‐head study was performed to compare chemotherapy and gefitinib in combination or with either agent alone as first‐line therapy, in terms of efficacy and safety. A total of 121 untreated patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who harbored sensitive EGFR mutations were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin, pemetrexed plus carboplatin or gefitinib alone. The progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients in the combination group (17.5 months, 95% CI, 15.3–19.7) was longer than that of patients in the chemotherapy group (5.7 months, 95% CI, 5.2–6.3) or gefitinib (11.9 months, 95% CI, 9.1–14.6) group. The (hazard ratios) HRs of PFS for the combination group vs. chemotherapy and gefitinib groups were 0.16 (95% CI, 0.09–0.29, p < 0.001) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.29–0.78, p = 0.003), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) in the combination therapy group, chemotherapy group and the gefitinib group was 82.5%, 32.5% and 65.9%, respectively. The combinational strategy resulted in longer overall survival (OS) than chemotherapy (HR = 0.46, p = 0.016) or gefitinib (HR = 0.36, p = 0.001) alone. Our finding suggested that treatment with pemetrexed plus carboplatin combined with gefitinib could provide better survival benefits for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.     

AMPK variant,a candidate of novel predictor for chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis using TRIBE,MAVERICC and FIRE3

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a key sensor of energy homeostasis and regulates cell metabolism, proliferation and chemotherapy/radiotherapy sensitivities. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the AMPK pathway-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We analyzed a total of 884 patients with mCRC enrolled in three randomized clinical trials (TRIBE, MAVERICC and FIRE-3: where patients were treated with FOLFIRI, mFOLFOX6 or FOLFOXIRI combined with bevacizumab or cetuximab as the first-line chemotherapy). The association between AMPK pathway-related SNPs and clinical outcomes was analyzed across the six treatment cohorts, using a meta-analysis approach. Our meta-analysis showed that AMPK pathway had significant associations with progression-free survival (PFS; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS; p < 0.001), but not with tumor response (TR; p = 0.220): PRKAA1 rs13361707 was significantly associated with favorable PFS (log HR = −0.219, SE = 0.073, p = 0.003), as well as PRKAA1 rs10074991 (log HR = −0.215, SE = 0.073, p = 0.003), and there were suggestive associations of PRKAG1 rs1138908 with unfavorable OS (log HR = 0.170, SE = 0.083, p = 0.041), and of UBE2O rs3803739 with unfavorable PFS (log HR = 0.137, SE = 0.068, p = 0.042) and OS (log HR = 0.210, SE = 0.077, p = 0.006), although these results were not significant after false discovery rate adjustment. AMPK pathway-related SNPs may be predictors for chemotherapy in mCRC. Upon validation, our findings would provide novel insight for selecting treatment strategies.     

Clinical value of next-generation sequencing in guiding decisions regarding endocrine therapy for advanced HR-positive/HER-2-negative breast cancer

ObjectiveThe mechanism of acquired gene mutation plays a major role in resistance to endocrine therapy in hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been allowed for the assessment of the genomic profiles of patients with advanced cancer. We performed this study to search for molecular markers of endocrine therapy efficacy and to explore the clinical value of ctDNA to guide precise endocrine therapy for HR-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-negative metastatic breast cancer patients.MethodsIn this open-label, multicohort, prospective study, patients were assigned to four parallel cohorts and matched according to mutations identified in ctDNA: 1) activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway preferred mTOR inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy; 2) estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutation preferred fulvestrant; 3) HER-2 mutations preferred pyrotinib; and 4) no actionable mutations received treatment according to the clinical situation. In all cohorts, patients were divided into compliance group and violation group. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome measure was overall survival (OS).ResultsIn all cohorts, the combined median PFS was 4.9 months, and median PFS for the compliance and violation groups was 6.0 and 3.0 months, respectively [P=0.022, hazard ratio (HR)=0.57]. Multivariate Cox regression model showed the risk of disease progression was lower in compliance group than in violation group (P=0.023, HR=0.55). Among the patients with HER-2 mutations, the median PFS was 11.1 months in the compliance group and 2.2 months in the violation group (P=0.011, HR=0.20). There was no significant difference in the median PFS between patients who did and did not comply with the treatment protocol in patients with activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR or ESR1 mutation.ConclusionsThe results suggest that ctDNA may help to guide the optimal endocrine therapy strategy for metastatic breast cancer patients and to achieve a better PFS. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) detection could aid in distinguishing patients with HER-2 mutation and developing new treatment strategies.     

Assessing tumor heterogeneity using ctDNA to predict and monitor therapeutic response in metastatic breast cancer

Tumor heterogeneity was associated with treatment outcome of metastatic cancers but few studies have examined whether tumor heterogeneity in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be used to predict treatment outcome. ctDNA analysis was performed in 37 HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with pyrotinib. Patients with high tumor heterogeneity had significantly worse PFS outcomes, with a median PFS of 30.0 weeks vs. 60.0 weeks for patients with low tumor heterogeneity (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; p = 0.02). Patients with trunk resistance mutations receiving pyrotinib monotherapy had worse outcomes (HR, 4.5; p = 0.03), with a median PFS of 7.8 weeks vs. 27.4 weeks for those with branch resistance mutations or without any resistance mutations in baseline ctDNA. Longitudinal monitoring of 21 patients during treatment showed that the molecular tumor burden index ([mTBI] a measure of the percentage of ctDNA in samples) was positively correlated with tumor size as evaluated by computed tomography (p < 0.0001, Pearson r = 0.52) and detected disease progression 8–16 weeks earlier. Our current findings suggested that ctDNA could be used to assess tumor heterogeneity and predict treatment outcomes. Furthermore, the mTBI is better for assessing therapeutic response than single gene mutations and might supplement the current therapeutic response evaluation system.     

Pre-treatment serum lactate dehydrogenase level is an important prognostic factor in high-grade extremity osteosarcoma

Background  Treatment of high-grade osteosarcoma remains a challenge. The prognostic significance of the pre-treatment serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level is currently controversial. Patients and methods  We reviewed records from all patients diagnosed with conventional high-grade osteosarcoma at our institution over a 25-year period and analysed the prognostic significance of LDH in high-grade localised extremity osteosarcomas treated with chemotherapy. Results  Between June 1977 and March 2003, 66 patients for whom follow-up was available were diagnosed with localised high-grade extremity osteosarcoma and treated with chemotherapy. The median age was 15 years, with only 3% older than 40 years, and the median follow-up was 100 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 67 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 113 months. The absence of a response to chemotherapy was correlated with a trend toward lower PFS and OS. High serum pre-treatment LDH level was associated in multivariate analyses with a poorer prognosis for both PFS (HR=8.623, 95%CI: 1.71–43.37; p=0.009) and for OS (HR=9.38; 95%CI: 1.73–50.74; p=0.009). Conclusion  In this series, the pre-treatment serum LDH level had an independent prognostic value for both PFS and OS in patients with high-grade localised extremity osteosarcoma. This measurement should be included in a large prospective prognostic series.     

Efficacy and safety of anti‐EGFR agents administered concurrently with standard therapies for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are used to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); however, their efficacy and safety is poorly understood. Here we evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti‐EGFR agents administered concurrently with standard therapies for HNSCC. Randomized controlled trials that evaluated addition of EGFR targeted therapy versus standard therapy alone were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression‐free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), locoregional control, and severe adverse events (SAEs, grade ≥ 3). Sixteen eligible trials with 4031 patients were included. Addition of anti‐EGFR regimens to standard therapy significantly improved OS of patients with HNSCC (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.96), with a moderately elevated rate of SAEs (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03–1.13). Subgroup analysis indicated that the survival benefit was observed when cetuximab was administered concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) for stage III/IV patients (HR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61–0.94; p = 0.01), or with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78–0.95; p = 0.005). Significantly increased ORR (RR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.05–2.18) and PFS (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59–0.88) were found in R/M HNSCC patients treated with anti‐EGFR plus chemotherapy, while no significant improvements were found in stage III/IV patients treated with anti‐EGFR plus standard therapy. In conclusion, addition of cetuximab to standard therapy may improve outcomes for R/M HNSCC patients, while causing a moderate increase in SAEs. For stage III/IV patients, anti‐EGFR mAb plus RT can improve OS compared with RT alone, while replacement of chemotherapy with EGFR mAb or adding EGFR mAb to combined chemotherapy and RT did not improve outcomes.     

首发单纯骨转移乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征及预后分析

  目的  探讨乳腺癌首发单纯骨转移（bone-only metastasis, BOM）患者的临床病理学特征及预后特点。  方法  回顾性分析2009年1月至2016年12月967例于天津医科大学肿瘤医院治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者的临床病理资料。分为180例BOM组与787例非BOM组, 对BOM组患者的预后因素行单因素分析和Cox回归模型多因素分析, 并根据激素受体（hormone receptor, HR）状态、转移数目及治疗方式行亚组分析。  结果  BOM组与非BOM组患者的中位无进展生存（progression-free survival, PFS）时间分别为19.4个月与10.0个月, BOM组中位总生存（overall survival, OS）时间为45.6个月。BOM组与非BOM组HR阳性患者分别占81.7%（147/180）与64.7%（509/787）（P < 0.001）。Cox回归模型多因素分析显示HR状态、转移位置、转移数目和治疗方式是BOM患者预后的独立影响因素。BOM组的HR阳性患者内分泌治疗（P=0.004）或联合治疗（P < 0.001）较单独化疗的预后更佳。影响BOM组HR阳性患者预后的主要因素为骨转移数目和内分泌治疗。单部位骨转移患者行内分泌治疗（P=0.004）或联合治疗（P= 0.002）较单独化疗的预后更佳, 多部位骨转移患者行联合治疗较单独化疗（P < 0.001）或内分泌治疗（P=0.04）的预后更佳。  结论  对于HR阳性BOM尤其是单部位骨转移患者, 单纯内分泌治疗可获得较为满意的疗效, 而对于多部位BOM则应考虑行联合治疗。      

Comparison of <i>UGT1A1</i> Polymorphism as Guidance of Irinotecan Dose Escalation in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI as the First-Line Therapy

Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) polymorphism plays a crucial role in the increased susceptibility and toxicity of patients to irinotecan. This retrospective, observational study compared the clinical outcomes and adverse events (AEs) in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with cetuximab or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI with UGT1A1 genotyping and irinotecan dose escalation as the first-line therapy. In total, 173 patients with mCRC with RAS wild-type were enrolled. Among them, 98 patients were treated with cetuximab, whereas 75 patients were treated with bevacizumab. All patients received irinotecan dose escalation based on UGT1A1 genotyping. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), metastatectomy, and severe adverse events (SAEs) between the two groups. The clinical effects of primary tumor sidedness and target therapy crossover were further analyzed. Over a median follow-up of 23.0 months [interquartile range (IQR), 15.0–32.5 months], no significant differences were observed between the cetuximab and bevacizumab groups in PFS [18.0 months vs. 14.0 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.517–1.027; hazard ratio (HR), 0.729; p = 0.071], OS (40.0 months vs. 30.0 months; 95% CI, 0.410–1.008; HR, 0.643; p = 0.054), ORR (65.3% vs. 62.7%; p = 0.720), DCR (92.8% vs. 86.7%; p = 0.175), metastatectomy (36.7% vs. 29.3%; p = 0.307), and SAEs (p = 0.685). Regardless of primary tumor sidedness and target therapy crossover, no significant differences were noted in efficacy and safety between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Our results revealed that patients with wild-type RAS mCRC, regardless of biologics, with UGT1A1 genotyping can tolerate escalated doses of irinotecan and potentially achieve a more favorable clinical outcome without significantly increased toxicity.     

Upfront Chemotherapy Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with or without Surgery in Older Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer: A Single Institution Experience and Review of the Literature

Objective: To report on clinical outcomes and toxicity in older (age ≥ 70 years) patients with localized pancreatic cancer treated with upfront chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without surgery. Methods: Endpoints included overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Results: A total of 57 older patients were included in the study. Median OS was 19.6 months, with six-month, one-year, and two-year OS rates of 83.4, 66.5, and 42.4%. On MVA, resection status (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.12–0.91, p = 0.031) was associated with OS. Patients with surgically resected tumors had improved median OS (29.1 vs. 7.0 months, p < 0.001). On MVA, resection status (HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.17–0.93, p = 0.034) was also associated with PFS. Patients with surgically resected tumors had improved median PFS (12.9 vs. 1.6 months, p < 0.001). There were 3/57 cases (5.3%) of late grade 3 radiation toxicity and 2/38 cases (5.3%) of Clavien-Dindo grade 3b toxicity in those who underwent resection. Conclusion: Multimodality therapy involving SBRT is safe and feasible in older patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Surgical resection was associated with improved clinical outcomes. As such, older patients who complete chemotherapy should not be excluded from aggressive local therapy when possible.     

Serum and urine survivin levels in breast cancer

This study was conducted to investigate the serum and urine levels of survivin in patients with breast cancer and the relationships with known prognostic parameters and therapy. Forty-three patients with breast cancer and 21 healthy control subjects were investigated. Serum samples were obtained on the first admission before adjuvant and metastatic treatment were given and after two cycles of chemotherapy. Serum and urine survivin levels were determined using enzyme immunometric assay (EIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively. There was no significant difference in the baseline serum and urine levels between patients with breast carcinoma and healthy controls (p=0.19 and p=0.84, respectively). None of the prognostic parameters analyzed were significantly correlated with the urine survivin concentrations. This was also true for serum survivin values, except for nodal involvement. Serum survivin levels were significantly higher in the patients with nodal involvement compared with node negatives (p=0.043). However, serum survivin levels were not influenced by the number of involved nodes (p=0.77). No significant correlation was found between the serum and urine levels of survivin (r=0.15, p=0.27). Serum and urine levels did not change significantly after chemotherapy (p=0.59 and p=0.50, respectively). In conclusion, the result of this study suggested that serum survivin level could be a sensitive marker for detecting metastases in lymph nodes from breast cancer patients. However, much research continues in this field, and exciting new knowledge will ultimately emerge.     

Association between diabetes mellitus and reduced efficacy of pembrolizumab in non–small cell lung cancer

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a highly prevalent chronic metabolic disorder. Although DM has been associated with immune dysfunction, the effect of DM on the efficacy of immunotherapy is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of DM on the efficacy of pembrolizumab in metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

The authors reviewed the medical records of consecutive metastatic NSCLC patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab either alone or in combination with chemotherapy at a single tertiary center. For validation, a computerized data from Maccabi Healthcare Services, a 2.5–million-member state health service was used.

Results

Of the 203 eligible patients, 51 (25%) had DM. Patients with DM had a significantly shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) (5.9 vs. 7.1 months, p = .004) and overall survival (OS) (12 vs. 21 months, p = .006). The shorter OS in diabetic patients was more pronounced when pembrolizumab was given alone (12 vs. 27 months, p = .03) than when combined with chemotherapy (14.3 vs. 19.4 months, p = .06). Multivariate analysis confirmed DM as an independent risk factor for shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11−2.50, p = .01) and OS (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09−2.76, p = .02). In a validation cohort of 452 metastatic NSCLC patients, the time on pembrolizumab treatment was shorter in diabetic patients (p = .025), with only 19.6% of patients remaining on treatment at 12 months compared to 31.7% of the nondiabetic patients.

Conclusions

This study suggests immunotherapy is less beneficial in diabetic NSCLC patients. More work is needed to verify our findings and explore similar effects in other cancer entities.     

Efficacy of First-line Chemotherapy Affects the Second-Line Setting Response in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for the majority of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations and many receive therapies beyond first-line. Secondline chemotherapy has been disappointing both in terms of response rate and survival and we know relatively little about the prognostic factors. Materials and Methods: One thousand and eight patients with advanced NSCLC who received second-line chemotherapy after progression were reviewed in Shanghai PulmonaryHospital, China, from September 2005 to July 2010. We analyzed the effects of potential prognostic factors on the outcomes of second-line chemotherapy (overall response rate, ORR; progression free survival, PFS; overall survival, OS). Results: The response and progression free survival of first-line chemotherapy affects the ORR, PFS and OS of second-line chemotherapy (ORR: CR/PR 15.4%, SD 10.1%, PD2.3%, p<0.001; PFS: CR/PR 3.80 months, SD 2.77 months, PD 2.03 months, p<0.001; OS: CR/PR 11.60 months, SD 10.33 months, PD 6.57 months, p=0.578, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, better response to first-line therapy (CR/PR: HR=0.751, p=0.002; SD: HR=0.781, p=0.021) and progression within 3-6 months (HR=0.626, p<0.001), together with adenocarcinoma (HR=0.815, p=0.017), without liver metastasis (HR=0.541, p=0.001), never-smoker(HR=0.772, p=0.001), and ECOG PS 0-1 (HR=0.745, p=0.021) were predictors for good OS following secondline chemotherapy. Conclusions: Patients who responded to first-line chemotherapy had a better outcome after second-line therapy for advanced NSCLC, and the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy, period of progression, histology, liver metastasis, smoking status and ECOG PS were independent prognostic factors for OS.