Endovascular Repair of Traumatic Rupture of the Thoracic Aorta: Single-Center Experience

Purpose Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta secondary to blunt chest trauma is a life-threatening emergency and a common cause of death, usually following violent collisions. The objective of this retrospective report was to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic disruptions with a single commercially available stent-graft. Methods Nine men (mean age 29.5 years) were admitted to our institution between January 2003 and January 2006 due to blunt aortic trauma following violent motor vehicle collisions. Plain chest radiography, spiral computed tomography, aortography, and transesophageal echocardiography were used for diagnostic purposes in all cases. All patients were diagnosed with contained extramural thoracic aortic hematomas, secondary to aortic disruption. One patient was also diagnosed with a traumatic thoracic aortic dissection, secondary to blunt trauma. All subjects were poor surgical candidates, due to major injuries such as multiple bone fractures, abdominal hematomas, and pulmonary contusions. All repairs were performed using the EndoFit (LeMaitre Vascular) stent-graft. Results Complete exclusion of the traumatic aortic disruption and pseudoaneurysm was achieved and verified at intraoperative arteriography and on CT scans, within 10 days of the repair in all patients. In 1 case the deployment of a second cuff was necessary due to a secondary endoleak. In 2 cases the left subclavian artery was occluded to achieve adequate graft fixation. No procedure-related deaths have occurred and no cardiac or peripheral vascular complications were observed within the 12 months (range 8–16 months) follow-up. Conclusions This is the first time the EndoFit graft has been utilized in the treatment of thoracic aortic disruptions secondary to chest trauma. The repair of such pathologies is technically feasible and early follow-up results are promising.     

Acute posttraumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: The role of angiography in a 7-year review

Between 1983 and 1989, 15 patients with acute rupture of the thoracic aorta by blunt trauma were seen. Superior mediastinal widening and obscuration of the aortic arch were the most important findings on chest radiograph. Computed tomography examinations in 7 patients showed mediastinal hematomas but did not reveal aortic lesions. Definitive diagnosis of traumatic aortic rupture was established by aortography in all 15 patients. Intraarterial digital substraction angiography proved to be as accurate as conventional film aortography and saved time.     

Blunt thoracic aortic injury in children

Thoracic aortic injury (TAI) in children secondary to blunt chest trauma is rare and less well documented than TAI in adults. To further establishe the incidence and radiographic manifestations of this severe injury, we reviewed our experimence with TAI in children over an 8-year period. We performed a computer search from the Trauma Registry at our level I trauma center for all cases of TAI among patients 16 years of age or younger who were admitted after sustaining blunt chest trauma between August 1984 and September 1992. We reviewed our records of all thoracic aortograms performed on children for blunt trauma during this same time period. Indication for angiography was determined by review of chest radiographs and medical records of all patients who underwent thoracic aortography. We reviewed medical records and all available chest radiographs, computed tomography (CT) examinations, and thoracic aortograms of children diagnosed with TAI. Of 308 children admitted with blunt chest trauma, 26 (8.4%) underwent angiography to exclude aortic or great vessel injury. Of these 26 patients, three (11.5%) were diagnosed with TAI, and one patient demonstrated a traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the proximal left subclavian artery. The incidence of TAI among children who sustained blunt chest trauma was 1.0% in our series. All three patients with TAI in our series were male, ages 10–12 (mean: 11 years). Chest radiographs on two of the patients with TAI revealed mediastinal widening, ill-defined aortic outline, shift of the trachea and nasogastric tube, and depression of the left main stem bronchus. The chest radiograph in one patient with TAI was technically inadequate. CT demonstrated abnormalities in two patients. Angiographic findings were similar to those seen in adults. TAI in children is rare, occurring in 1% of children sustaining blunt chest trauma in our series. Our findings support previous reports that the plain film, CT, and angiographic findings with this injury resemble those found in adults.     

Role of contrast-enhanced helical CT in the evaluation of acute thoracic aortic injuries after blunt chest trauma

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the value of contrast-enhanced helical CT for detecting and managing acute thoracic aortic injury (ATAI). Between June 1995 and February 2000, 1419 consecutive chest CT examinations were performed in the setting of major blunt trauma. The following CT findings were considered indicative of ATAI: intimal flap; pseudoaneurysm; contour irregularity; lumen abnormality; and extravasation of contrast material. On the basis of these direct findings no further diagnostic investigations were performed. Isolated mediastinal hematoma on CT scans was considered an indirect sign of ATAI: In these cases, thoracic aortography was performed even if CT indicated normal aorta. Seventy-seven patients had abnormal CT scans: Among the 23 patients with direct CT signs, acute thoracic aortic injuries was confirmed at thoracotomy in 21. Two false-positive cases were observed. The 54 remaining patients had isolated mediastinal hematoma without aortic injuries at CT and corresponding negative angiograms. The 1342 patients with negative CT scans were included in the 8-month follow-up program and did not show any adverse sequela based on clinical and radiographic criteria. Contrast-enhanced helical CT has a critical role in the exclusion of thoracic aortic injuries in patient with major blunt chest trauma and prevents unnecessary thoracic aortography. Direct CT signs of ATAI do not require further diagnostic investigations to confirm the diagnosis: Isolated aortic bands or contour vessel abnormalities should be first considered as possible artifacts or related to non-traumatic etiologies especially when mediastinal hematoma is absent. In cases of isolated mediastinal hematoma other possible sources of bleeding should be considered before directing patients to thoracic aortography.     

Spiral CT aortography: an efficient technique for the diagnosis of traumatic aortic injury

The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency of spiral CT (SCT) aortography for diagnosing acute aortic lesions in blunt thoracic trauma patients. Between October 1992 and June 1997, 487 SCT scans of the chest were performed on blunt thoracic trauma patients. To assess aortic injury, the following SCT criteria were considered: hemomediastinum, peri-aortic hematoma, irregular aspect of the aortic wall, aortic pseudodiverticulum, intimal flap and traumatic dissection. Aortic injury was diagnosed on 14 SCT examinations (2.9 %), five of the patients having had an additional digital aortography that confirmed the aortic trauma. Twelve subjects underwent surgical repair of the thoracic aorta, which in all but one case confirmed the aortic injury. Two patients died before surgery from severe brain lesions. The aortic blunt lesions were confirmed at autopsy. According to the follow-up of the other 473 patients, we are aware of no false-negative SCT examination. Our limited series shows a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 99.8 % of SCT aortography in the diagnosis of aortic injury. It is concluded that SCT aortagraphy is an accurate diagnostic method for the assessment of aortic injury in blunt thoracic trauma patients. Received 18 July 1997; Revision received 11 September 1997; Accepted 23 October 1997     

Multidetector CT of blunt traumatic venous injuries in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis

Venous injuries as a result of blunt trauma are rare. Even though current protocols for multidetector computed tomography (CT) of patients with trauma are designed to evaluate primarily the solid organs and arteries, blunt venous injuries may nevertheless be identified, or at least suspected, on the basis of the multidetector CT findings. Venous injuries are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Diagnosis of a possible venous injury is crucial because the physical findings of a venous injury are nonspecific and may be absent. This article aims to make the radiologist aware of various venous injuries caused by blunt trauma and to provide helpful hints to aid in the identification of venous injuries. Multidetector CT technology, in combination with interactive manipulation of the raw dataset, can be useful in the creation of multiplanar reconstructed images and in the identification of a venous injury caused by blunt trauma. Familiarity with direct and indirect signs of venous injuries, as well as with examples of blunt traumatic venous injuries in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, will help in the diagnosis of these injuries.     

Traumatic rupture of the right hemidiaphragm: Diagnosis by chest radiography

Sixteen cases of blunt trauma resulting in surgically confirmed traumatic rupture of the right hemidiaphragm were reviewed from the Trauma Registry of Allegheny General Hospital. Only 10 of the 16 cases (63%) could be retrospectively diagnosed on chest radiographs. We found that a diagnosis of right-sided diaphragmatic rupture can be suggested when the apex of the right hemidiaphragm is shifted superomedially to a position approximately midway between the mediastinum and the right chest wall. Eight of these 10 cases with positive chest radiographic findings exhibited this superomedial shift of the diaphragmatic apex. On initial assessment, without using this sign, 5 of these 10 cases were not diagnosed. We feel that the combination of elevation of the right hemidiaphragm in association with a medial shift of the apex of that diaphragmatic dome in a patient who has suffered extensive blunt thoracoabdominal trauma is strongly suggestive of traumatic rupture of the diaphragm.     

Imaging of blunt chest trauma

In western European countries most blunt chest traumas are associated with motor vehicle and sport-related accidents. In Switzerland, 39 of 10,000 inhabitants were involved and severely injured in road accidents in 1998. Fifty two percent of them suffered from blunt chest trauma. According to the Swiss Federal Office of Statistics, traumas represented in men the fourth major cause of death (4 %) after cardiovascular disease (38 %), cancer (28 %), and respiratory disease (7 %) in 1998. The outcome of chest trauma patients is determined mainly by the severity of the lesions, the prompt appropriate treatment delivered on the scene of the accident, the time needed to transport the patient to a trauma center, and the immediate recognition of the lesions by a trained emergency team. Other determining factors include age as well as coexisting cardiac, pulmonary, and renal diseases. Our purpose was to review the wide spectrum of pathologies related to blunt chest trauma involving the chest wall, pleura, lungs, trachea and bronchi, aorta, aortic arch vessels, and diaphragm. A particular focus on the diagnostic impact of CT is demonstrated. Received: 29 November 1999; Accepted: 28 January 2000     

Blunt traumatic rupture of a mainstem bronchus: spiral CT demonstration of the “fallen lung” sign

Tracheo-bronchial injuries occur in less than 1 % of blunt chest trauma patients. Indirect signs, such as pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax, and/or subcutaneous emphysema, are revealed on admission plain films and chest CT survey. In most instances, however, tracheo-bronchoscopy is mandatory in assessing the definite diagnosis of tracheo-bronchial lesion. Occasionally, an abnormal course of a mainstem bronchus or a “fallen lung” sign, featuring a collapsed lung in a dependent position, hanging on the hilum only by its vascular attachments, may allow for CT diagnosis of a blunt traumatic bronchial injury. Received: 3 February 2000 Revised: 16 June 2000 Accepted: 22 June 2000     

Traumatic injuries: imaging of thoracic injuries

Chest trauma is one of the most important causes of death, in particular in individuals under the age of 40 years. The mortality rate for chest trauma, often related to motor vehicle accidents, is approximately 15.5%; it increases dramatically to 77% with associated shock and head injury (Glasgow scores of 3-4). The accurate diagnosis of pathologies consequent to blunt chest trauma depends on a complete knowledge of the different clinical and radiological manifestations. The first diagnostic approach is classically based on chest X-ray often carried out on supine position at the hospital admission. A CT study must then be performed in all chest trauma patients in whom there is even the smallest diagnostic doubt on plain film. In particular, spiral CT (SCT) assumes a fundamental role in the demonstration of mediastinal hemorrhage and direct signs of aortic lesions. At present, SCT is routinely part of a diagnostic evaluation which also includes scans of the brain and the abdomen in polytraumatized patients. Magnetic resonance is the ideal method for visualizing diaphragmatic lesions. Furthermore, recent reports have demonstrated the high diagnostic value of MR in evaluating aortic injuries. The purpose of this article is to review the most common radiological patterns related to chest trauma.     

False-positive aortography following blunt chest trauma: Case report

We describe a patient in whom thoracic aortography performed following blunt chest trauma revealed what appeared to be a traumatic tear of the proximal descending aorta. As the patient initially refused surgery, aortography was repeated 18 days later, confirming these findings. At thoracic aortotomy the aorta appeared normal; there was no hematoma or tear. We believe this to be the first reported case of false-positive aortography following blunt chest trauma (see Note added in proof).     

Computed tomography evaluation of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: an outcome study.

OBJECTIVE: [corrected] To assess the long-term outcome of blunt trauma patients with suspected thoracic aortic or great vessel injury that was evaluated with contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT). METHODS: We studied the outcome of 278 consecutive patients who received contrast-enhanced CT for blunt chest trauma with computerized searches of the regional trauma database, hospital medical records, universal government medical coverage plan billing records, and regional vital statistics databases. Data retrieved included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, status of the aorta and proximal great vessels at contrast-enhanced CT, hospital discharge diagnoses, and outpatient procedural billings with specific attention to aortic or great vessel injury. Median follow-up was 615 days following the traumatic event. RESULTS: Six subjects demonstrated direct signs of aortic or proximal great vessel injury on contrast-enhanced chest CT, as follows: aortic pseudoaneurysm and intimal flap (n = 4), carotid artery dissection (n = 1), and aortic dissection (n = 1). All were surgically treated, except the patient with aortic dissection, who was treated medically. In the other subjects, contrast-enhanced CT was negative (n = 230) or showed isolated mediastinal hematoma (n = 42). The computerized searches of the medical databases showed that none of these 272 subjects had procedures for, or died from, aortic or great vessel injury during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Computerized searches of medical databases found no evidence of missed thoracic aortic or proximal great vessel injury in blunt trauma patients who were evaluated with contrast-enhanced chest CT.     

急诊床旁超声在腹部脏器闭合性损伤诊断中的应用价值

目的 探讨急诊床旁超声检查对腹部闭合性损伤的诊断应用价值.方法 应用便携式超声仪对184例外伤患者行急诊床旁超声检查,观察腹部脏器声像图有无异常改变,并重视观察腹腔内有无游离液体及气体.结果 超声诊断总符合率91.8%(169/184),其中单脏器损伤156例,符合率95.5%(149/156),多脏器损伤28例,符合率71.4%(20/28),漏诊21例,误诊3例,漏、误诊率13%(24/184).手术治疗119例;保守治疗65例,经CT、MRI检查及临床保守治疗证实.结论 急诊床旁超声检查对腹部闭合性损伤的诊断符合率高,为临床提供迅速、可靠的诊断信息.     

急诊床旁超声在腹部脏器闭合性损伤诊断中的应用价值

目的 探讨急诊床旁超声检查对腹部闭合性损伤的诊断应用价值.方法 应用便携式超声仪对184例外伤患者行急诊床旁超声检查,观察腹部脏器声像图有无异常改变,并重视观察腹腔内有无游离液体及气体.结果 超声诊断总符合率91.8%(169/184),其中单脏器损伤156例,符合率95.5%(149/156),多脏器损伤28例,符合率71.4%(20/28),漏诊21例,误诊3例,漏、误诊率13%(24/184).手术治疗119例;保守治疗65例,经CT、MRI检查及临床保守治疗证实.结论 急诊床旁超声检查对腹部闭合性损伤的诊断符合率高,为临床提供迅速、可靠的诊断信息.     

Real-time, contrast-enhanced sonographic imaging in emergency radiology

PURPOSE: To report our pilot experience in the evaluation of traumatic and nontraumatic emergencies with contrast-specific, continuous-mode sonography (US) and a second-generation contrast medium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2002 and December 2003 we evaluated 126 acute patients by using real-time contrast-specific US: blunt abdominal trauma (76 cases), penetrating abdominal trauma (3), blunt scrotal trauma (1), right upper abdominal pain (10), left upper abdominal pain (9), epigastric pain (2), flank pain (5), right lower abdominal pain (2), scrotal pain (7), postoperative abdominal sepsis (1), post-biopsy haemorrhage (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (8), postsurgical aortic bleeding (1). In all cases the radiologist performed a complete baseline US survey and then decided whether or not to add a contrast-enhanced examination. RESULTS: All contrast-enhanced sonographic studies were completed proving to be adequate for diagnostic purposes and without adverse reactions to contrast medium. There were 40 true negatives. The final diagnosis, obtained in 85 positive cases out of 86, was: splenic injury (28 cases), hepatic injury (3), renal injury (3), multiple injuries (3), pancreatic and portal vein injury (1), colonic-mesocolic injury (1), testicular trauma (1), hepatic abscess (9), hepatic ischaemia (1), gangrenous cholecystitis (1), splenic infarction (8), splenic haematoma abscess (1), renal infection (4), renal infarction (1), necrotizing pancreatitis (1), post-biopsy haemorrhage (1), appendicitis (2), peritoneal abscesses (1), testicular torsion (6), orchiepididymitis (1), iliac artery dissection (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (6), aortic periprosthetic hemorrhage (1). Out of 85 positive cases, agreement between baseline US and contrast-specific US was absent in 8% of cases, low in 26%, intermediate in 42%, and high in 24%. Baseline US had 3 false positives. Relevance of contrast-specific US was absent in 17% of cases, low (additional data not relevant for patient management) in 26%, intermediate (relevant additional data not modifying patient management) in 34%, and high (additional data modifying patient management) in 23%. Agreement between contrast-specific US and the gold standards was absent in 0% of cases, low in 6%, intermediate in 38%, and high in 56%. Contrast-specific US had 2 false positive results. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time contrast-specific US is an effective technique in emergency imaging. Its role should not be considered as a replacement of CT (though in some instances it can be considered a valuable alternative) but as a useful integration of conventional US. By always having the opportunity to add contrast-enhanced imaging, in case of interpretation doubts or diagnostic difficulties, the radiologist can assess the emergency patient with improved confidence and skill.     

Value of spiral CT in hemodynamically stable patients following blunt chest trauma

Introduction: Features of spiral CT (SCT) — fast scanning, dynamic injection of contrast allowing optimal vessel opacification, and supplemental multiplanar imaging — promises to provide increased accuracy in the diagnosis of acute and non acute thoracic vascular disease. Recent work demonstrating the cost effective triage of hemodynamically stable patients after blunt chest trauma for angiography based on dynamic CT findings has prompted an investigation into the accuracy of SCT in this clinical setting. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients seen in the emergency department over the period of one year for aortic, thoracic, or blunt chest trauma evaluation was performed (74 patients) and all SCT scans available were reviewed and data reformatted for optimal delineation of pathology using maximum intensity projection and multiplanar reformation. The accuracy and predictive positive and negative values of SCT were calculated with respect to angiography, surgical, and/or clinical follow up evaluation. Results: Twenty three (31%) patients went directly to angiography owing to mediastinal widening on chest film and hemodynamic instability, of which four were positive and required emergent surgery. Seven hemodynamically stable patients (9%) had noncontrast SCT owing to mediastinal widening on chest film, all of which had angiography with none having great vessel trauma. Fourty four hemodynamically stable patients (60%) had contrast enhanced SCT (ceSCT), of which five (11%) were abnormal and underwent angiography, four of these were positive for aortic damage, one for a subclavian artery laceration. Of the remaining 39 patients who had normal ceSCT; five had angiography, all of which were normal. Of the remaining 34 patients that had normal ceSCT none had adverse outcome on clinical follow-up, minimum of 12 months. Conclusion: The predictive positive value for aortic trauma of ceSCT in blunt trauma is 80%, with a predictive negative value of 100%, indicating that it is feasible for SCT to be a first line exam in blunt chest trauma in the future.     

急诊床旁超声在腹部脏器闭合性损伤诊断中的应用价值

目的 探讨急诊床旁超声检查对腹部闭合性损伤的诊断应用价值.方法 应用便携式超声仪对184例外伤患者行急诊床旁超声检查,观察腹部脏器声像图有无异常改变,并重视观察腹腔内有无游离液体及气体.结果 超声诊断总符合率91.8%(169/184),其中单脏器损伤156例,符合率95.5%(149/156),多脏器损伤28例,符合率71.4%(20/28),漏诊21例,误诊3例,漏、误诊率13%(24/184).手术治疗119例;保守治疗65例,经CT、MRI检查及临床保守治疗证实.结论 急诊床旁超声检查对腹部闭合性损伤的诊断符合率高,为临床提供迅速、可靠的诊断信息.     

Role of CT in excluding major arterial injury after blunt thoracic trauma

The role of CT in the diagnosis of major vascular rupture following blunt decelerating chest trauma is controversial. Its value in excluding major arterial injury has not yet been determined. During a 12-month period we obtained dynamic enhanced thoracic CT studies in 20 patients with blunt decelerating thoracic trauma who had abnormal or equivocal mediastinal contours on chest radiographs. In all cases diagnosis was confirmed by either digital subtraction (18 patients) or conventional thoracic angiography (two patients). CT scans showed evidence of direct aortic injury in three patients and evidence of mediastinal hematoma in five others. Four of these eight patients had major arterial injury verified angiographically and at surgery. In two patients the CT scan was considered equivocal; both patients had normal thoracic angiograms. CT excluded direct vascular injury or mediastinal hematoma in 10 patients. All 10 had normal thoracic angiograms. This preliminary study suggests that, in patients sustaining blunt decelerating thoracic trauma, thoracic CT may be more valuable than chest radiography in excluding major vascular injury and, in some cases, may reduce the need for thoracic angiography.     

Trauma of the chest

Trauma to the chest may cause a wide range of injuries including fractures of the thoracic skeleton, contusion or laceration of pulmonary parenchyma, damage to the tracheobronchial tree, diaphragmatic rupture or cardiac contusion. Conditions affecting primarily extrathoracic sites may have indirect effects on the lungs causing adult respiratory distress syndrome or fat embolism. Laceration of the aorta is the typical and likewise most life threatening complication of massive blunt chest trauma necessitating immediate diagnosis and repair.Conventional radiography rather than cross-sectional imaging is the mainstay in diagnosing thoracic trauma. During the critical phase with often concomitant shock, pelvic and spinal injuries tailored radiographic views or even upright chest radiographs are impractical. The severely traumatized patient is usually radiographed in the supine position and suboptimal roentgenograms may have to be accepted for several reasons. It is well documented that many abnormalities detected on CT were not apparent on conventional radiographs, but CT is reserved for hemodynamical stable patients. Nevertheless certain situations like aortic rupture require further evaluation by CT and aortography.The value of conventional radiography, CT, MRI and aortography in chest trauma is reviewed and typical radiographic findings are presented.     

Acute traumatic aortic injury: imaging evaluation and management

Despite recent advances in prehospital care, multidetector computed tomographic (CT) technology, and rapid definitive therapy, trauma to the aorta continues to be a substantial source of morbidity and mortality in patients with blunt trauma. The imaging evaluation of acute aortic injuries has undergone radical change over the past decade, mostly due to the advent of multidetector CT. Regardless of recent technologic advances, imaging of the aorta in the trauma setting remains a multimodality imaging practice, and thus broad knowledge by the radiologist is essential. Likewise, the therapy for acute aortic injuries has changed substantially. Though open surgical repair continues to be the mainstay of therapy, percutaneous endovascular repair is becoming commonplace in many trauma centers. Here, the historical and current status of imaging and therapy of acute traumatic aortic injuries will be reviewed.