Foramen ovale electrodes can identify a focal seizure onset when surface EEG fails in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: We analyze a series of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) associated with hippocampal sclerosis (HS) submitted to presurgical investigation with scalp sphenoidal, followed by foramen ovale electrodes (FO), and, when necessary, with depth temporal electrodes. We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of FO in patients with MTLE-HS. METHODS: We included patients who had phase I investigation with bitemporal independent seizures, nonlateralized ictal onsets, or ictal onset initiating in the side contralateral to the side of hippocampal sclerosis. Patients whose implanted FO failed to demonstrate an unambiguous unilateral ictal onset were later evaluated with depth hippocampal electrodes. RESULTS: Between May 1994 and December 2004, 64 patients met our inclusion criteria: 33 female (51.5%) and 31 male subjects (48.5%). The mean age at enrollment was 37.66+/-10.6 years (range, 12-56 years). The groups with nonlateralized surface ictal EEG onsets and contralateral EEG onsets had a greater chance of lateralization with FO when compared with the group with bilateral independent seizures on surface EEG (p<0.01). Foramen ovale electrodes lateralized the seizures in 60% of patients. Seventy percent of patients became seizure free after temporal lobectomy. Five patients were implanted with depth temporal electrodes after FO video-EEG monitoring. The depth-electrode EEG onsets confirmed the results of FO video-EEG monitoring in all patients, and the surgery was refused. CONCLUSIONS: In MTLE-HS, FO is a reliable method for lateralization of seizures that are not clearly recorded by surface EEGs.     

A new class of electrodes of 'intermediate invasiveness': preliminary experience with epidural pegs and foramen ovale electrodes in the mapping of seizure foci.

Non-invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) recording with scalp and sphenoidal leads is often insensitive to precise localization of ictal onset, and can be distorted by skull defects and underlying lesions or deformities of the brain. We present preliminary experience with epidural pegs and foramen ovale electrodes used in 30 cases of intractable partial epilepsy where non-invasive EEG did not define a zone of epileptogenesis with sufficient precision to recommend resection, or to dictate precise placement of depth electrodes or subdural girds. Custom designed mushroom shaped peg electrodes were implanted via 4.5 mm twist-drill skull holes for epidural recording from cortical areas of suspected epileptogenesis. Foramen ovale electrodes (flexible 3-contact leads) were introduced via percutaneous puncture of Meckel's cave cistern for recording from mesiotemporal regions. Chronic recording was performed for 4 to 26 days (mean 9.2 days). There were no serious complications and signal quality was excellent in every electrode. Based on interictal and ictal records, resective surgery was performed in 8 cases, more focused further invasive recording was recommended in 15 cases (with subsequent resective surgery), and surgical options were excluded in 7 cases. It is concluded that these electrodes of 'intermediate invasiveness' represent a safe and effective tool in the armamentarium for mapping complicated or elusive epileptic foci. They can be used in lieu of, in addition to, or prior to more invasive measures. Their greatest advantage lies in their relative safety and ability to survey extensive zones of suspected epileptogenesis so as to guide and focus further mapping and surgical intervention.     

Extent of ictal origin in mesial temporal sclerosis patients monitored with subdural intracranial electrodes predicts outcome.

In patients with mesiotemporal sclerosis, posterior hippocampal involvement at the ictal onset is not associated with an excellent outcome. A study confirmed that ictal onset in the posterior parahippocampal gyrus is associated with a less favorable outcome compared with ictal onset in the anterior parahippocampal gyrus in patients with mesiobasal temporal lobe epilepsy who are undergoing foramen ovale recording. The authors hypothesized that involvement of the two medial contact points of posterior basal temporal subdural (SD) strip at the ictal onset, representing ictal onset in the posterior parahippocampal gyrus, may also adversely influence the surgical outcome. With this objective, the authors assessed the incidence of posterior basal temporal SD strip (the two medial contact points) involvement at the ictal onset in patients with mesiotemporal sclerosis and determined whether presence of this finding influenced surgical outcome. Thirty-six patients with mesiotemporal sclerosis underwent a single SD grid (lateral frontotemporal) and strips (three basal temporal and one orbitosubfrontal) monitoring. Based on the earliest involvement of basal temporal strips (the two medial contact points) during the seizure, patients were classified into (1) anterior and/or middle basal temporal, or (2) posterior basal temporal (with or without involvement of anterior and/or middle basal temporal) ictal onset groups. A temporal lobectomy with adequate resection of the ictal onset zone was performed in all patients. Surgical outcome was based on Engel's classification. Six of 36 (17%) patients were classified into the posterior basal temporal ictal onset group. Only two patients from the posterior basal temporal ictal onset group experienced a good outcome compared with 26 of 30 patients from anterior and/or middle basal temporal ictal onset group (P = 0.01). In patients with mesiotemporal sclerosis who were monitored with SD electrodes, involvement of the two medial contact points of posterior basal temporal strip at the ictal onset (representing ictal onset in the posterior parahippocampal gyrus) occurred in 17% of the patients. These patients might not experience an excellent surgical outcome despite including the ictal onset zone in resection. These findings may be useful in presurgical counseling of patients with mesiotemporal sclerosis who undergo intracranial SD monitoring.     

Neuronal Complexity Loss in Interictal EEG Recorded with Foramen Ovale Electrodes Predicts Side of Primary Epileptogenic Area in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Replication Study

Summary: Purpose: To investigate whether a correct lateralization of the primary epileptogenic area by means of neuronal complexity loss analysis can be obtained from interictal EEG recordings using semi-invasive foramen ovale electrodes. In a previous study with recordings from intrahippocampal depth and subdural strip electrodes it was shown that the dynamics of the primary epileptogenic area can be characterized by an increased loss of neuronal complexity in patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).
Methods: Neuronal complexity loss analysis was applied. This analysis method is derived from the theory of nonlinear dynamics and provides a topological diagnosis even in cases where no actual seizure activity can be recorded. We examined interictal EEG recorded intracranially from multipolar foramen ovale electrodes in 19 patients with unilateral TLE undergoing presurgical evaluation.
Results: The primary epileptogenic area was correctly lateralized in 16 of the 19 investigated patients. The misclassification of the side of seizure onset in three patients might be attributed to the larger distance between the foramen ovale electrodes and the mesial temporal structures as compared to intrahippocampal depth electrodes.
Conclusions: Our results confirm the previous findings and provide further evidence for the usefulness of nonlinear time-series analysis for the characterization of the spatiotemporal dynamics of the primary epileptogenic area in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.     

Lateralization of temporal lobe foci: depth versus subdural electrodes.

OBJECTIVES: Definitive localization of an epileptic focus correlates with a favorable outcome following epilepsy surgery. This study was undertaken to determine the incremental value of data yielded for surgical decision making when using subdural electrodes alone and in addition to depth electrodes for temporal lobe epilepsy. METHODS: Standardized placement for intracranial electrodes included: (1) longitudinal placement of bilateral temporal lobe depth electrodes; (2) bilateral subtemporal subdural strips; and (3) bilateral orbitofrontal subdural strips. Sixty-three events were randomly reviewed for: (1) subdural electrodes alone; and (2) depth electrodes in conjunction with subdural electrodes. RESULTS: Of the 63 seizures, 54 (85.7%) demonstrated congruent lateralization to ipsilateral subtemporal subdural strip electrodes (based on depth electrode localization) when subdural strip electrodes were utilized alone. In 3 of 22 patients, 7 seizures demonstrated 'false localization' on subdural electrode analysis alone when compared with depth recording and post-surgical outcome. For these 3 patients, retrospective review of neuroimaging demonstrated suboptimal ipsilateral placement of subtemporal subdural electrodes with the most mesial electrode lateral to the collateral sulcus. Four additional patients had suboptimal placement of subtemporal subdural electrodes. Two of these 4 patients had congruent localization with subdural electrodes to ipsilateral depth electrodes despite suboptimal placement. Subtemporal subdural electrodes accurately localized for all seizures from the mesial temporal lobe when the mesial electrodes of the subtemporal subdural strip recorded mesial to the collateral sulcus from the parahippocampal region. CONCLUSION: We conclude that although there are high concordance rates between subdural and depth electrodes, localization of seizure onset based on subdural strip electrodes alone may result in inaccurate focus identification with potential for possible suboptimal treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy. When subtemporal subdural electrodes provide recording from the parahippocampal region, there is accurate localization of the seizure focus. If suboptimal placement occurs lateral to the collateral sulcus, the electroencephalographer cannot make a definitive identification of the seizure focus.     

Combined depth and subdural electrode investigation in uncontrolled epilepsy

We used both depth and subdural electrodes to obtain localization of the seizure focus in 47 medically refractory epileptic patients. Seizures were localized in 33 patients. Onset was consistently localized by the depth electrodes in 23 patients, was variable or simultaneous in depth and subdural electrodes in 6 (in the same lobe), and was consistently localized to subdural electrodes in 4. All patients localized with subdural electrodes were extratemporal and 3 of the 4 had lesions on imaging studies which helped guide location of electrode placement. Eighty-seven percent of temporal lobe seizures began in hippocampus (recorded by the depth electrode), and 80% were eventually propagated to the ipsilateral temporal neocortex (recorded by the subdural electrode). In 8 patients with bilateral temporal depth and subdural recording, seizures never spread to the contralateral neocortex before the ipsilateral neocortex. Subdural electrodes were 20% less sensitive than depth electrodes in detection of seizures beginning in hippocampus but were accurate when lateralized. Variable or simultaneous unilateral neocortical versus hippocampal temporal lobe seizure onset, determined by the combined study, was significantly correlated with less favorable seizure control after anteromedial temporal lobectomy and hippocampectomy.     

Time from ictal subdural EEG seizure onset to clinical seizure onset: prognostic value for selecting temporal lobectomy candidates

Long-term subdural EEG recording was performed to test the hypothesis that the duration from ictal subdural EEG seizure onset (ECOT) is prognostic for seizure-free outcome following temporal lobectomy. In 48 patients with complex partial seizures, temporal lobectomy was based on invasive localization of the ictal seizure focus. Subdural EEG data were analyzed for association with seizure-free outcome (seizure-free: yes or no) at a minimum of one year following temporal lobectomy. As the duration from ictal subdural EEG seizure onset to clinical seizure onset increased, the odds of being seizure-free postoperatively increased. The best fitting statistical model for predicting seizure-free outcome included seizure onset (unilateral vs. bilateral) and duration from ictal subdural EEG seizure onset to clinical seizure onset. While selection of temporal lobectomy candidates has increasingly emphasized noninvasive recording, some scalp-EEG monitored patients cannot be offered surgery for various reasons, one of which may include ictal EEG seizure onset following clinical seizure onset. When subdural EEG monitoring is performed for selection of temporal lobectomy candidates, analysis of the duration from subdural EEG seizure onset to clinical seizure onset should improve the prognostic value of the subdural EEG data for seizure-free outcome following temporal lobectomy.     

Visual and semiautomated evaluation of epileptogenicity in focal cortical dysplasias — An intracranial EEG study

IntroductionThe aim of the study was the evaluation of the added value of depth to subdural electrodes in delineating epileptogenicity of focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) and to test the Epileptogenicity Index (EI) in this setting.Material and methodsFifteen patients with FCD underwent iEEG with subdural and depth electrodes. Visual/EI analysis was performed in up to three habitual seizures per patient.ResultsVisual analysis: Grid onset seizures (n = 10) started in electrodes overlying the lesion in 7 and remote from it in 3 cases. Depth onset seizures (n = 7) affected only intralesional contacts in 4, intra- and extralesional in 2, and exclusively extralesional in 1 patient. Seizures started in depth and grid contacts simultaneously in 2 cases.EI analysis: The EI completely confirmed visual localization of seizure onset in 8 cases and depicted ictal onset-time accurately in 13. Beta/gamma ictal patterns were most reliably captured.Impact on surgical decision: Resection outline differed from MRI lesion in 7 patients based on grid and in three based on depth electrode information.DiscussionIn FCD, seizures can be generated within gyral/deep tissue appearing normal on imaging.ConclusionInvestigating FCD with subdural and depth electrodes is efficient to outline the seizure onset zone. The EI is a helpful additional tool to quantify epileptogenicity. Specific ictal patterns are prerequisite for reliable results.     

Spatial localization and time-dependant changes of electrographic high frequency oscillations in human temporal lobe epilepsy

Purpose:   High frequency oscillations (HFOs) >200 Hz are believed to be associated with epileptic processes. The spatial distribution of HFOs and their evolution over time leading up to seizure onset is unknown. Also, recording HFOs through conventional intracranial electrodes is not well established. We therefore wished to determine whether HFOs could be recorded using commercially available depth macroelectrodes. We also examined the spatial distribution and temporal progression of HFOs during the transition to seizure activity.
Methods:   Intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) recordings of 19 seizures were obtained from seven patients with temporal lobe epilepsy using commercial depth or subdural electrodes. EEG recordings were analyzed for frequency content in five spectral bands spanning DC-500 Hz. We examined the spatial distribution of the different spectral bands 5 s before and 5 s after seizure onset. Temporal changes in the spectral bands were studied in the 30-s period leading up to seizure onset.
Results:   Three main observations were made. First, HFOs (100–500 Hz) can be recorded using commercial depth and subdural grid electrodes. Second, HFOs, but not <100 Hz oscillations, were localized to channels of ictal onset (100–200, 400–500 Hz, p < 0.05; 300–400 Hz, p < 0.001). Third, temporal analysis showed increased HFO power for approximately 8 s prior to electrographic onset (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:   These results suggest that HFOs can be recorded by depth macroelectrodes. Also, HFOs are localized to the region of primary ictal onset and can exhibit increased power during the transition to seizure. Thus, HFOs likely represent important precursors to seizure initiation.     

Analysis of Foramen Ovale Electrode-Recorded Seizures and Correlation with Outcome Following Amygdalohippocampectomy

We report a detailed electroclinical analysis of 320 seizures recorded by foramen ovale electrodes in 77 potential candidates for selective temporal lobe surgery because of antiepileptic drug-resistant seizures. The exact localization of the origin of seizure discharges, the electroencephalographic (EEG) seizure onset patterns, transhemispheric propagation, propagation time, duration of discharge, laterality of discharge termination, postictal focal slowing, correspondence between foramen ovale recordings and the scalp EEG, and the influence of antiepileptic drug modifications were studied and correlated with the clinical seizure semiology and with postoperative outcome following selective amygdalohippocampectomy. In general, the foramen ovale electrode technique provided good neurophysiological information in candidates for selective amygdalohippocampectomy. The following ictal signs predicted a good surgical outcome: (a) unilateral and anterior mediobasal temporal lobe seizure onset, (b) short seizure duration, (c) no or infrequent contralateral seizure discharge propagation, and (d) if propagation to the contralateral mediobasal temporal lobe occurred, the postoperative outcome was better the later the contralateral mediobasal temporal lobe was affected. Postoperative outcome was also better the less frequently contralateral interictal spikes occurred. No direct predictive value could be attributed to the presence of an initial arrest reaction.     

Fear as the main feature of epileptic seizures

OBJECTIVES: There are circumstances in which partial seizures may be misdiagnosed as acute psychiatric disturbances. In particular, when fear is the prominent feature the patient may be considered for years as having panic attacks. Eight patients in whom fear was the main symptom of the seizures are reported on. Patients who had a proved lack of consciousness during the fits and patients in whom fear was just fear of having a seizure were excluded. The ictal involvement of temporal limbic and frontal structures in those patients with fear of particular intensity was studied. METHODS: The localisation of the epileptogenic zone was assessed by prolonged interictal EEG recordings as well as ictal video-EEG recording of at least one seizure in every patient; five had ictal SPECT and four had chronic stereotactic implantation of depth electrodes (SEEG). In six patients, a cortical resection was performed with an Engel's class 1 outcome (minimum 28 months follow up, except for two patients). RESULTS: Localisations of primary epileptogenic zones were right temporal in three patients, left temporal in three, bitemporal in one, and frontal in one. In all cases, diagnosis of epileptic seizures could be clinically evoked because of the stereotypy of fits and of associated symptoms. The association of a fear sensation, autonomic symptoms, and coordinated behaviour suggests disturbance of a particular system. The SEEG data argue for temporolimbic and prefrontal lobe involvement in the expression of ictal fear. CONCLUSIONS: In intense ictal fear, with coordinated behaviour and autonomic features, the discharge may involve or interfere with a physiological complex information processing network. This network involves orbitoprefrontal, anterior cingulate, and temporal limbic cortices.     

Identification of reproducible ictal patterns based on quantified frequency analysis of intracranial EEG signals

Purpose: The identification of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) is crucial for planning epilepsy surgery in patients with drug‐resistant partial epilepsy. This task may require intracerebral encephalography (EEG) monitoring, the results of which are usually interpreted by visual presurgical inspection. A computer‐assisted method for rapidly identifying reproducible ictal patterns based on the analysis of time, frequency, and spatial domains of stereo‐EEG (SEEG) signals is described here. Methods: A new method for EZ detection was tested on SEEG recordings performed by intracerebral electrodes in eight patients with pharmacoresistant partial epilepsy. SEEG data were exported to a program developed in LabView. Key Findings: Prevalent frequencies during seizure events were evaluated by Fourier transform and further integral algorithms. Different frequencies and the relative powers were simultaneously evaluated in all recording leads. Patterns characterized by specific and prevalent frequencies were identified in a subset of recording sites during both seizure onset and seizure development. Three‐dimensional (3D) maps of the measurements obtained from each recording channel were reconstructed on magnetic resonance coordinates to visualize the spatial distribution of the EZ. With this method, the reproducibility of ictal patterns in the same patient was characterized. The boundaries of the EZ identified with this algorithm correlated well with the EZ recognized with the traditional approach (n = 8). The spatial distribution of specific SEEG signals associated with different types of seizures was also analyzed in two patients. Significance: We describe a computer‐assisted method to acquire information on EZ boundaries and to verify reproducibility of seizure patterns from intracerebral recordings performed in patients with pharmacoresistant partial epilepsies.     

Dynamic changes of ictal high-frequency oscillations in neocortical epilepsy: using multiple band frequency analysis

PURPOSE: To characterize the spatial and temporal course of ictal high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) recorded by subdural EEG in children with intractable neocortical epilepsy. METHODS: We retrospectively studied nine children (four girls, five boys; 4-17 yr) who presented with intractable extrahippocampal localization-related epilepsy and who underwent extraoperative video subdural EEG (1000 Hz sampling rate) and cortical resection. We performed multiple band frequency analysis (MBFA) to evaluate the frequency, time course, and distribution of ictal HFOs. We compared ictal HFO changes before and after clinical onset and postsurgical seizure outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 79 seizures showed HFOs. We observed wide-band HFOs ( approximately 250 Hz, approximately 120 electrodes) in six patients either with partial seizures alone (three patients) or with epileptic spasms (three patients). Three patients with partial seizures that secondarily generalized had wide-band HFOs ( approximately 170 Hz) before clinical onset and sustained narrow-band HFOs (60-164 Hz) with electrodecremental events after clinical onset ( approximately 28 electrodes). In four postoperatively seizure-free patients, more electrodes recorded higher-frequency HFOs inside the resection area than outside before and after clinical seizure onset. In five patients with residual seizures, electrodes recorded more HFOs that were of higher or equal frequency outside the surgical area than inside after clinical onset. CONCLUSION: For partial seizures alone and epileptic spasms, more electrodes recorded only wide-band HFOs; for partial seizures that secondarily generalized, fewer electrodes recorded wide-band HFOs, but in these seizures electrodes also recorded subsequent sustained narrow-band ictal HFOs. Resection of those brain regions having electrodes with ictal, higher HFOs resulted in postsurgical seizure-free outcomes.     

Clinical Challenges in Invasive Monitoring in Epilepsy Surgery

Summary: Invasive monitoring aids in selecting patients for epilepsy surgery. This article reviews the methods employed to obtain intracranial EEG, data interpretation, and problems that arise during intracranial investigations. The relative merits of depth, subdural, epidural, and foramen ovale electrodes are reviewed, and a strategy for their use is suggested. Characteristic interictal and ictal EEG findings are summarized, and the problems encountered in interpreting data are discussed.     

Successful stereoelectroencephalography re-evaluation in epilepsy patients after failed initial subdural grid evaluation

Objective

Epilepsy surgery success is dependent on accurate localization of the epileptogenic zone. Despite the use of invasive EEG using subdural grids and strips, surgical failures can occur. In this series, we explore the utility of a second evaluation with stereoelectroencephalography in patients whose initial invasive evaluation with subdural grid electrodes was unsuccessful in localizing seizure origin.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent subdural grid evaluation (SDE) at our center and identified patients who underwent a re-evaluation with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG).

Results

We identified three patients who had both subdural and SEEG electrodes in the region of the identified epileptogenic zone in whom the initial SDE evaluation failed to make the patients seizure-free. Two of these patients underwent a second resection and became seizure-free.

Significance

Stereoelectroencephalography can be useful in the re-evaluation and re-operation of patients who previously had surgical failure using SDE.     

Presurgical evaluation for partial epilepsy: relative contributions of chronic depth-electrode recordings versus FDG-PET and scalp-sphenoidal ictal EEG

One hundred fifty-three patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy underwent chronic stereotactic depth-electrode EEG (SEEG) evaluations after being studied by positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and scalp-sphenoidal EEG telemetry. We carried out retrospective standardized reviews of local cerebral metabolism and scalp-sphenoidal ictal onsets to determine when SEEG recordings revealed additional useful information. FDG-PET localization was misleading in only 3 patients with temporal lobe SEEG ictal onsets for whom extratemporal or contralateral hypometabolism could be attributed to obvious nonepileptic structural defects. Two patients with predominantly temporal hypometabolism may have had frontal epileptogenic regions, but ultimate localization remains uncertain. Scalp-sphenoidal ictal onsets were misleading in 5 patients. For 37 patients with congruent focal scalp-sphenoidal ictal onsets and temporal hypometabolic zones, SEEG recordings never demonstrated extratemporal or contralateral epileptogenic regions; however, 3 of these patients had nondiagnostic SEEG evaluations. The results of subsequent subdural grid recordings indicated that at least 1 of these patients may have been denied beneficial surgery as a result of an equivocal SEEG evaluation. Weighing risks and benefits, it is concluded that anterior temporal lobectomy is justified without chronic intracranial recording when specific criteria for focal scalp-sphenoidal ictal EEG onsets are met, localized hypometabolism predominantly involves the same temporal lobe, and no other conflicting information has been obtained from additional tests of focal functional deficit, structural imaging, or seizure semiology.     

Foramen ovale recordings: a presurgical investigation in epilepsy

The aim of our study was to determine when foramen ovale recordings add useful information to scalp EEG recordings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with hippocampal measurements. We evaluated the outcome of 79 patients with non-lesional partial epilepsy with presumed temporal seizure onset. Ictal foramen ovale recordings were performed in 16 patients with normal MRI ('MRI-negative group') and 41 patients with lateralizing MRI but non-lateralizing scalp EEG ('discordant group'). 22 patients with concordant MRI and scalp EEG were not investigated with foramen ovale recordings ('concordant group'). The seizure-free rate was higher in concordant than discordant patients despite additional investigation with foramen ovale electrodes (71 and 55% seizure free, respectively). No useful localizing information was added with foramen ovale recordings in MRI-negative patients.     

The role of intracranial electrode reevaluation in epilepsy patients after failed initial invasive monitoring

PURPOSE: Intracranial electrode recording often provides localization of the site of seizure onset to allow epilepsy surgery. In patients whose invasive evaluation fails to localize seizure origin, the utility of further invasive monitoring is unknown. This study was undertaken to explore the hypothesis that a second intracranial investigation is selected patients warrants consideration and can lead to successful epilepsy surgery. METHODS: A series of 110 consecutive patients with partial epilepsy who had undergone intracranial electrode evaluation (by subdural strip, subdural grid, and/or depth electrodes) between February 1992 and October 1998 was retrospectively analyzed. Of these, failed localization of seizure origin was thought to be due to sampling error in 13 patients. Nine of these 13 patients underwent a second intracranial investigation. RESULTS: Reevaluation with intracranial electrodes resulted in satisfactory seizure-onset localization in seven of nine patients, and these seven had epilepsy surgery. Three frontal, two temporal, and one occipital resection as well as one multiple subpial transection were performed. Six patients have become seizure free, and one was not significantly improved. The mean follow-up is 2.8 years. There was no permanent morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients in whom invasive monitoring fails to identify the site of seizure origin, reinvestigation with intracranial electrodes can achieve localization of the region of seizure onset and allow successful surgical treatment.     

Stereoelectroencephalography in the “difficult to localize” refractory focal epilepsy: Early experience from a North American epilepsy center

Purpose: Stereo‐electroencephalography (SEEG) enables precise recordings from deep cortical structures, multiple noncontiguous lobes, as well as bilateral explorations while avoiding large craniotomies. Despite a long reported successful record, its application in the United States has not been widely adopted. We report on our initial experience with the SEEG methodology in the extraoperative mapping of refractory focal epilepsy in patients who were not considered optimal surgical candidates for other methods of invasive monitoring. We focused on the applied surgical technique and its utility and efficacy in this subgroup of patients. Methods: Between March 2009 and May 2011, 100 patients with the diagnosis of medically refractory focal epilepsy who were not considered optimal candidates for subdural grids and strips placement underwent SEEG implantation at Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center. Demographics, noninvasive clinical data, number and location of implanted electrodes, electrophysiologic localization of the epileptic zone, complications, and short‐term seizure outcome after resection were prospectively collected and analyzed. Key Findings: Mean age was 32 years (range 5–68 years); 54 were male and 46 female. The mean follow‐up after resection was 15 months. In total, 1,310 electrodes were implanted. Analyses of the SEEG recordings resulted in the electrographic localization of the epileptogenic focus in 96 patients. In the group of 75 patients who underwent resection, only 53 had at least 12 months follow‐up. From this group, 33 patients (62.3%) were seizure‐free at the end of the follow‐up period. The presence of abnormal pathologic finding was strongly associated with postoperative seizure control (p = 0.005). The risk of hemorrhagic complications per electrode was 0.2%. Significance: In patients who are not considered to be ideal candidates for subdural grids and strips implantation, the SEEG methodology is a safe, useful and reliable alternative option for invasive monitoring in patients with refractory focal epilepsy, providing an additional mean for seizure localization and control in a “difficult to localize” subgroup of patients.     

Comparison of Combined Versus Subdural or Intracerebral Electrodes Alone in Presurgical Focus Localization

Summary: purpose: The yield of subdural versus intracerebra1 electrodes for ictal localization remains a point of controversy. We assessed the relative sensitivity of these two types of electrodes per case. Methods: Eighty-three intracranial recordings obtained from 82 patients were retrospectively reviewed to establish which type of electrode performed best in which patients and which seizure types. Results: Sixty (73%) of 82 patients had temporal lobe seizure onsets, eight frontal, nine widespread or multifoca/multilobar or both, whereas in five, seizure onset was not localized. Exclusive use of intracerebral electrodes would have been sufficient for accurate localization of the seizure—-onset zone in all 35 patients with strictly mesial temporal seizure onsets. In only 20 (57%) of these 35 patients, the same decision would have been reached with exclusive use of subdural electrodes. In wide-spread neocortical and mesial temporal seizures (n = 25). yield of both electrode types was at about the same level, but neither was sufficient to identify the zone of ictal onset on its own. In frontal or multilobar seizures (n = 22), yield of subdural electrodes was slightly better then that of the intracerebral electrodes, but was not sufficient in all cases. Conclusions: This study indicates that, depending on the characteristics of the seizure disorder, exclusive use of either intracerebral or subdural electrodes may easily result in erroneous diagnosis because of insufficient sampling of the brain. These findings are in contrast with other studies emphasizing the high yield of reliable EEG findings in evaluations with a single type of electrode and corroborate the results of one of our previous studies.