关节镜下Bankart修复术治疗肩关节复发性前脱位:手术效果及复发危险因素分析

目的 探讨关节镜下Bankart修复术(缝合锚钉技术)治疗肩关节复发性前脱位的临床效果,并对术后复发不稳的可能危险因素进行分析.方法 2002年3月至2010年3月连续收治肩关节复发性前脱位患者259例,均采用关节镜下缝合锚钉技术进行Bankart修复手术,其中188例患者获得随访.患者手术时平均年龄25.3岁(13～58岁);其中男性143例、女性45例;运动员50名、非运动员138名.随访时采用美国肩肘关节外科协会评分系统(ASES)肩关节评分、Rowe评分以及患者满意度评价手术效果.术前肩关节ASES评分平均72.6分,Rowe评分平均33.4分.对于肩关节术后不稳的复发率、关节活动范围以及术后复发不稳的危险因素进行评估.结果 188例患者术后平均随访38.6个月(12～110个月).术后肩关节ASES评分平均91.9分,与术前比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.001);术后Rowe评分平均81.9分,与术前比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.001).患者手术满意度调查显示,满意152例、基本满意16例、不满意20例,满意率为89.4%.术后有24例患者复发脱位,总体复发率为12.8%;运动员患者复发率为28.0%,非运动员复发率为7.2%.术后患者平均肩关节外展外旋为75.2°,与术前比较无明显丧失(P＞0.05).关节镜Bankart修复术后复发不稳与患者年龄及是否为运动员明显相关(P＜0.05);而与术前病程长短、锚钉类型、锚钉数目、骨性Bankart损伤、合并肩关节上盂唇撕裂损伤、合并后或下方盂唇损伤、合并肩袖撕裂、关节松弛以及肩袖间隙闭合等因素无明显相关(P＞0.05).结论 关节镜下采用缝合锚钉进行Bankart修复术是治疗肩关节复发性前脱位的有效方法,临床效果比较满意.年轻患者(≤20岁)和运动员患者是术后肩关节复发不稳的高危因素,必要时选择切开手术.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate retrospectively the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with a minimum 1-year follow-up and to assess risk factors for recurrence.Methods From March 2002 to March 2010,259 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors.And 188 patients(50 athletes,138 nonathletes)were available for follow-up.The mean age at the time of surgery was 25.3 years (range,13-58 years).The mean follow-up was 38.6 months(range,12-110 months).All of the 188 patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES)shoulder score and Rowe score system.The rate of recurrent instability,range of motion,and risk factors for postoperative recurrence were evaluated.The ASES score was 72.6 preoperatively,and Rowe score was 33.4.Results The ASES scores improved significantly to 91.9 postoperatively(P＜0.001).The Rowe scores improved to 81.9 postoperatively(P＜0.001).And 152 patients were greatly satisfied with the results,16 satisfied and 20 unsatisfied.The satisfactory rate was 89.4%.24 patients(12.8%)suffered a recurrence after surgery,14 athletes and 10 nonathletes.The recurrence rates were 28.0% in the athlete group and 7.2% in the nonathlete group.On average there was no significant loss of external rotation postoperatively(average,75.2° preoperatively and 67.2° postoperatively).Patients under age 20,and athlete patients were associated with recurrence(P＜ 0.05).Other factors including length of time until surgery,type of anchors,number of anchors,presence of bony Bankart lesion,presence of a superior labrum,anterior and posterior tear,presence of posterior or inferior labrum lesion,presence of rotator cuff tear,ligamentous laxity and rotator interval closure did not influence the recurrence rate(P＞0.05).Conclusions Arthroscopic Bankart repair is a good option for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation.Identification of risk factors for recurrence allows for consideration of open stabilization.In the series,patients under age 20 and athlete patients are the most important risk factors for recurrence.     

Similar functional outcome using single anterior portal and standard two portalstechnique in recurrent dislocation of shoulder

Purpose:Recurrent dislocation of shoulder(RDS)is a common injury in high demand professionals,like athletes and military personnel.The treatment for the patients with Bankart lesion is the arthroscopic repair.This present study compares the outcomes of two different techniques of arthroscopic Bankart repair i.e.a standard two anterior portals technique and a single anterior portal technique in patients with RDS.Methods:Patients with traumatic RDS met the inclusion criteria were managed with Bankart repair using either two anterior portals(Group A)or a single anterior portal(Group B)technique.Patients were evaluated before the intervention and at the mean follow-up of approximately two years using Rowe score,Oxford shoulder score and Tegner activity scale.Results:The mean age of the patients in Groups A(n=34)and B(n=37)was 29.64 years and 29.05 years respectively(p=0.66).The dominant shoulder was involved in 27 patients in Group A and 22 patients in Group B(p=0.069).The operative time in Group A and B was 68.52 min and 46.35 min,respectively(p<0.001).The complications at follow-up,the mean Rowe score and Oxford score improved significantly in both groups compared with the pre-operative values.However,the final outcome scores were not significantly different between the both groups.The median Tegner's score preoperatively and at follow-up was 7 and 6,respectively in Groups A and B.Conclusions:Single anterior portal technique is an effective treatment modality,yielding a similar outcome as two anterior portals technique in the management of RDS.     

关节镜下Bankart损伤修复联合Remplissage填塞术治疗合并Hill-Sachs缺损的成年人复发性肩关节前脱位

目的:探讨关节镜下Bankart损伤修补术联合Remplissage填塞术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位合并HillSachs损伤的方法和临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2016年3月至2019年3月行关节镜下Bankart损伤修复治疗关节盂骨缺损20%的复发性肩关节前脱位患者106例,其中男76例,女30例;年龄18~45(27.3±8.6)岁;左肩59例,右肩47例。手术前后采用肩关节主动活动度评估关节活动范围(range of motion,ROM),采用美国肩肘外科协会(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons,ASES)评分,Constant-Murley评分及肩关节功能Rowe评分对肩关节功能和稳定性进行评估。结果:所有患者获得随访,均取得满意疗效,术后随访时间21~60(41.5±18.5)个月。1例术后出现感染,再次关节镜清理后感染控制,其余患者均未出现感染、关节腔积血及再脱位等临床并发症。肩关节前屈上举由术前的(158.33±15.72)°提高至末次随访的(169.43±10.04)°,内旋由术前T7(T4-T10)改变至末次随访T8(T5-T10);平均体侧外旋、外展90°外旋分别由术前(58.46±15.51)°及(99.37±14.09)°减小至末次随访的(53.18±14.90)°及(92.52±13.10)°。ASES评分、Constant-Murley评分及Rowe评分均较术前明显改善。结论:关节镜下Bankart损伤修补联合Remplissage填塞术治疗合并Hill-Sachs缺损的成年人复发性肩关节前脱位临床效果满意,虽然外旋功能较术前减弱,但能够有效重建肩关节功能,避免术后再脱位的发生。     

Outcome of repair of chronic tear of the pectoralis major using corkscrew suture anchors by box suture sliding technique

AIM To assess the functional and clinical results of repair of chronic tears of pectoralis major using corkscrew and sliding suture technique. METHODS In this retrospective study, we reviewed the results of pectoralis major repair in 11 chronic cases( 6 wk) done between September 2011 and December 2014 at our institute. In all cases repair was done by same surgeon using corkscrew suture anchors and box suture sliding technique. At 6 mo, after surgery magnetic resonance imaging was done to see the integrity of the repair. Functional evaluation was done using Penn and ASES scores. Pre and postoperative Isokinetic strength was measured.RESULTS Average follow-up was 48.27 ± 21.0 mo. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate the outcome scores. The average ASES score increased from an average of 54.63 ± 13.0 preoperatively to 95.09 ± 2.60 after surgery at their last follow-up. The average Penn score also increased from 5.72 ± 0.78, 2.81 ± 1.32 and 45.81 ± 1.72 to 9.36 ± 0.80, 8.27 ± 0.90 and 59 ± 1.34 for pain, satisfaction and function respectively. Follow up magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)(at 6 mo) showed continuity and the bulk of pectoralis major muscle in all cases. Average isokinetic strength deficiency in horizontal adduction at 60° was 13.63% ± 6.93% and at 120° was 10.18% ± 4.93% and in flexion at 60° was 10.72% ± 5.08% and at 120° was 6.63% + 3.74%. Results showed that both ASES and Penn score improved significantly(2 tailed P value = 0.0036).CONCLUSION We could conclude from this series that pectoralis major repair even in chronic cases using 5.5 mm corkscrew anchors give excellent functional and cosmetic results. In chronic cases the repairable length of the tendon is not available and sliding suture technique allows for fixation of worn out tendomuscular junction to bone without letting cutting through the muscle.     

Role of shoulder gradient in the pathogenesis of rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND Shoulder gradient has been associated with shoulder pathologies such as shoulder impingement syndrome.AIM To investigate if there is an association between shoulder gradient and incidence of rotator cuff tear(RCT).METHODS A total of 61 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of RCT were included in this retrospective study. The anteroposterior radiograph of the shoulder was used to measure shoulder gradient in adduction and neutral rotation positions. The pain level was assessed with the visual analog scale for pain.RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 55.7 ± 12.3 years. The mean visual analog scale of the patients was 4.1 ± 1.2. The mean shoulder gradient was 14.11°± 2.65° for the affected shoulder and 15.8°± 2.2° for the unaffected shoulders. This difference was not statistically significant(P = 0.41). A difference of 1.15°± 1.82° was found between the injured and non-injured shoulder. No significant association was found between the gradient difference of the shoulder and demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.CONCLUSION Shoulder gradient is not associated with the pathology of RCT. Yet, future studies with more standardization and a larger sample size are needed to investigate the role of shoulder gradient in RCT pathogenesis further.     

Is CT scan a predictor of instability in recurrent dislocation shoulder?

Purpose: Glenoid bone defect and the defect on the posterior-superior surface of the humerus “HillSachs lesion” are the commonly seen bony lesions in patients with recurrent dislocation shoulder. Computed tomography (CT) scan is considered as the best option in assessing the bony defects in the recurrent dislocation shoulder. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological corelation in the patients with recurrent dislocation shoulder. Methods: Forty-four patients of recurrent dislocation shoulder who were evaluated between January 2015 and December 2017 at a tertiary care center, clinically and radiologically using CT scan and meeting the inclusion criteria, were included. The correlation between the clinical history of the number of dislocations and the bone loss using CT scan was evaluated. Two sided statistical tests were performed at a significance level of a = 0.05. The analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS STATISTICS (version 22.0). Results: All the patients were male with mean age of 25.95 (SD ± 4.2) years were evaluated. Twenty-four patients sustained injury in sporting activities while 20 patients sustained injury in training. There were an average of 4.68 (SD ± 3.1, range 2-15, median 3) episodes of dislocation. Forty-one patients had the glenoid bone loss while 40 had the Hill-Sachs lesions. The mean glenoid width defect was 10.80% (range 0-27%) while the mean Hill-Sachs defect was 14.27 mm (range 0-26.6 mm). The mean area of bone loss of the glenoid surface was 10.81% (range 0-22.4%). The lesions were on track in 34 patients and off track in 10 patients. Conclusions: CT scan of the shoulder joint is an effective method for assessing the amount of bone loss. The number of dislocations are correlated significantly with off-track lesions and the amount of bone loss on the glenoid and Hill-Sachs lesion. The glenoid width bone loss of more than 9.80% or Hill-Sachs defect of more than 14.80 mm are the critical defects after which the frequency of dislocations increases.     

肩关节镜下Bankart损伤的治疗体会

目的探讨肩关节镜下金属缝合锚钉固定治疗Bankart损伤的术后疗效及治疗体会。方法 2010年3月至2014年3月共收治38例Bankart损伤的患者,均应用全关节镜下锚定缝合技术进行Bankart修复术。其中男31例,女7例,患者手术时平均年龄29.5岁(20~39岁),其中12例患者为初次脱位,26例患者为反复多次脱位。所有患者术前均有肩关节脱位病史。术前患者采用美国肩肘外科协会评分系统(American shoulder and elbow surgeons evaluation form,ASES)肩关节评分,平均(83.7±12.8)分,Rowe评分(36.2±7.8)分,Constant-Murley评分(85.4±8.8)分。术中所有患者均采用3~4枚金属缝合锚钉进行Bankart修复术。结果 38例患者均获随访,随访时间13~40个月,平均23个月。术后肩关节前屈上举、体侧外旋及内旋活动度较术前无明显改变,外展位外旋活动度较术前明显改变,术后ASES评分平均(96.8±4.6)分,与术前相比差异具有统计学意义;术后Rowe评分平均(90.2±11.7)分,Constant-Murley评分(97.9±7.7)分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义。术后2例患者出现再次脱位,手术失败率5.3%(2/38)。结论应用全关节镜下锚定缝合技术进行Bankart修复术是治疗Bankart损伤的有效方法。合适的手术时机,充分的松解及关节囊及韧带复合体的提拉缝合、锚钉的合理分布是手术成功的保障。     

肩关节交锁后脱位合并反向Hill-Sachs的改良关节镜下治疗

[目的]介绍关节镜下改良的Mclaughlin技术及后方盂唇修补治疗肩关节后脱伴啮合性Hill-Sachs损伤。[方法] 2015年3月～2017年5月,本院收治5例绞锁性肩关节后脱位患者,其中男4例,女1例;年龄35～51岁,平均(41.30±3.50)岁,受伤至手术时间平均为(3.10±0.60)个月,术前CT三维均证实为绞锁性的肩关节后脱位,肱骨头前缘缺损(反Hill-Sachs) 20%～40%,采用改良的Mclaughlin技术及后方盂唇修补的手术方式治疗,采用ASES、Constant-Murley和Rowe评分评定临床效果。[结果]随访6～24个月,平均(18.50±4.60)个月。末次随访时ASES、Constant-Murley和Rowe评分均较术前有显著增加,差异有统计学意义(P0.001)。所有患者末次随访时均获得良好生活与运动能力,无患者发生再次患肩脱位。[结论]关节镜下改良的Mclaughlin技术治疗绞锁性肩关节后脱位疗效良好。     

关节镜下非打结型缝合锚钉修补Bankart损伤治疗复发陛肩关节前脱位

目的 探讨关节镜下非打结型缝合锚钉修补Bankan损伤治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的疗效.方法 复发性肩关节前脱位患者14例,均为男性;年龄18～34岁,平均25.2岁;左侧4例,右侧10例,涉及主力侧12例;均为单向不稳.术前脱位次数为3～36次,平均13.5次.关节镜下采用可吸收非打结型缝合锚钉治疗Bankart损伤.术前及术后随访采用ASES评分及Constant-Murley功能评估.结果 所有患者均获得随访,随访时间11～22个月,平均17个月.术中发现9例合并Hill-Sachs损伤,3例合并骨性Bankart损伤,2例合并后下盂唇损伤,2例合并SLAPⅡ型损伤,1例合并关节内游离体.14例患者术前及末次随访时肩关节平均前屈上举为163.4°±8.6°和169.7°±4.2°;外展90°时,平均外旋角度分别为58.5°+13.6°和90.3 °±5.5.;术后外展90°时,患侧外旋角度较健侧受限8.4°±6.2°术前及末次随访时ASES评分为(77.4±3.7)分和(94.3±2.6)分,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);其中VAS不稳定评分平均为(7.2±1.4)分和(1.2 ±0.6)分(P＜0.01);Constant-Mudey评分平均为(78.1±4.6)分和(93.9±3.7)分.术后无一例患者发生再脱位,且均重返伤前工作岗位.结论 肩关节镜下Bankart 重建手术是治疗复发性肩关节脱位的有效方法 .非打结型缝合锚钉简化了手术操作步骤,减少手术时间和创伤.     

Posterior shoulder fracture-dislocation: A systematic review of the literature and current aspects of management

Purpose Posterior fracture-dislocation of shoulder is an infrequent traumatic event;however,most orthopaedic surgeons may face the challenge of treating it.The aim of this study is to review and summarise systematically the current principles of the management of this complex injury,and create a treatment algorithm.Methods Both PubMed and Scopus Databases were systematically searched for the terms“posterior shoulder fracture-dislocation”or“posterior glenohumeral fracture-dislocation”or“posterior glenoid fracture-dislocation”for articles written in English and published in the last decade.Results A total of 900 articles were identified,of which 13 were retained for analysis.A total of 153 patients(161 shoulders)were identified.These patients were treated either with open reduction and internal fixation,modified McLaughlin procedure,allograft/autograft humeral head reconstruction or shoulder arthroplasty.The mean age was 40.15 years.The mean postoperative Constant score in cases treated by open reduction and internal fixation was 86.45,whereas by bone graft was 84.18.Further,the mean postoperative Constant score was between 79.6 and 67.1 in those that were managed by modified McLaughlin and arthroplasty procedure,respectively.Conclusion The management of posterior shoulder fracture-dislocation may be challenging,and the best surgical option depends on many variables such as the chronicity of the injury,the presence of a fracture at the level of the surgical neck or tuberosities and the extend of the Hill-Sachs lesion if any.A treatment algorithm is proposed,based on the current literature in an effort to create a consensus for these injuries.For the acute shoulder fracture-dislocations,an open reduction should be performed.For the chronic fracture/dislocations in the elderly low-demand patients,conservative treatment should be performed.For the rest of the patients,depending on the severity of the Hill-Sachs lesion different surgical options are available such as the McLaughlin technique,the use of an allograft,osteotomy or arthroplasty.     

全关节镜下手术治疗骨性Bankart损伤的术后疗效分析

目的 探讨肩关节镜下金属缝合锚钉固定治疗骨性Bankart损伤的术后疗效.方法 2004年5月至2008年5月共收治45例存在肩关节骨性Bankart损伤的患者,均应用全关节镜下复位,金属缝合锚钉固定术治疗.其中男性40例,女性5例.手术时平均年龄27.6岁(16.5～50.1岁),平均随访时间29.7个月(24.8～...     

关节镜下双袢固定自体髂骨修复合并严重骨缺损的Bankart损伤临床疗效分析

目的 探讨关节镜下双袢固定自体髂骨修复合并严重骨缺损的Bankart损伤患者肩关节临床功能改善及肩胛盂骨缺损修复情况.方法 回顾性分析2015年7月至2018年7月在南方医科大学第三附属医院运动医学科采用关节镜下双袢固定自体髂骨植骨术治疗的17例合并严重骨缺损的Bankart损伤患者.在术前和术后使用美国肩肘外科协会(...     

复发性肩关节前脱位与关节内继发损伤的相关性研究

目的通过分析肩关节前脱位次数、病程与关节内继发损伤的关系,探讨复发性肩关节前脱位对关节内继发损伤的影响。方法回顾分析2005年1月-2009年6月关节镜下应用缝合锚钉行Bankart重建术治疗的59例复发性肩关节前脱位患者临床资料。男48例,女11例;年龄15～42岁,平均27.6岁。初次脱位原因:接触性体育运动21例,非接触性体育运动13例,日常活动11例,外伤14例。术前脱位3～32次,平均10.6次。初次脱位至手术时间为11个月～12年,中位时间5.9年。患者恐惧试验及复位试验均呈阳性。术前美国加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩关节功能评分为(22.3±2.4)分,Constant-Murley评分为(73.1±5.8)分。关节镜下观察关节内继发损伤情况,并进行统计分析。结果术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合。患者均获随访,随访时间16～58个月,平均37.3个月。末次随访时,UCLA肩关节功能评分为(34.6±1.7)分,Constant-Murley评分为(86.7±6.1)分,与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术前关节脱位次数和关节软骨损伤的严重程度成正相关(rs=0.345,P=0.007),和Hill-Sachs损伤严重程度成正相关(rs=0.708,P=0.000);首次脱位至手术时间和关节软骨损伤严重程度成正相关(rs=0.498,P=0.000),与Hill-Sachs损伤严重程度无相关性(rs=0.021,P=0.874)。结论复发性肩关节前脱位早期行Bankart重建有利于肩关节功能恢复,避免或延缓关节内继发损伤的发生和发展。     

关节镜下非打结型与打结型缝合锚钉Bankart重建治疗复发性肩关节前向不稳

目的探讨关节镜下非打结型与打结型缝合锚钉对复发性肩关节前向不稳Bankart损伤的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2006年3月至2009年1月广州军区广州总医院收治的44例复发性肩关节脱位Bankart损伤患者的临床资料,根据关节镜下修复方式的不同分为非打结组（可吸收非打结型缝合锚钉修复,20例）和打结组（打结型缝合锚钉修复,24例）。采用美国肩肘外科医师（ASES）评分及Constant-Murley功能评分对患者术前、末次随访时肩关节功能进行评估,记录肩关节活动范围,观察并发症发生情况。结果所有患者获得随访,随访时间20～46个月,平均随访时间30个月。非打结组术前和终末随访时肩关节前屈上举角度、外展90°时外旋角度分别为（163±9）°和（170±4）°、（58±14）°和（90±6）°,术后外展90°时患侧外旋角度较健侧受限（8±6）°;术前和终末随访时ASES评分、Constant-Murley评分分别为（77.4±3.7）分和（94.3±2.6）分、（78.1±4.6）分和（93.9±3.7）分,两者比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。打结组术前和终末随访时肩关节前屈上举角度、外展90°时外旋角度分别为（162±8）°和（170±6）°、（61±13）°和（91±6）°,术后外展90°时患侧外旋角度较健侧受限（5±3）°;术前和终末随访时ASES评分、Constant-Murley评分分别为（75.8±2.9）分和（95.1±3.7）分、（76.2±5.9）分和（92.8±5.2）分,两者比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。两组间术前、术后各项指标比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。患者均未出现术后再脱位,均重返伤前工作岗位。结论肩关节镜下Bankart重建手术是治疗复发性肩关节前向不稳的有效方法,非打结型和打结型缝合锚钉修复Bankart损伤疗效相似。     

复发性肩关节前脱位的关节镜治疗

目的 探讨肩关节镜下Bankart重建手术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的疗效、适应证和手术要点.方法 随访40例应用肩关节镜下Bankart重建进行治疗的复发性肩关节前脱位患者,随访时间为24～58个月,平均35.9个月;年龄15～54岁,平均27.8岁.40例均为单方向性不稳定.术前平均脱位次数为14.1次(2～90次),其中28例发生于主力侧.术中采用金属缝合锚(Mini-Revo)进行Bankart重建.随访内容包括ASKS评分、Constant-Murley评分、VAS不稳定评分及ROWE评分进行功能评估.结果 40例患者术前和终末随访时肩关节前屈上举平均为[(157.5±20.6)°,x ±s.下同]和(170.0±6.7)°,体侧外旋平均为(58.5±18.9)°和(55.9±15.0)°,ASES评分平均为(82.7±16.7)和(97.2±6.9),VAS不稳定评分平均为(6.2±1.6)和(1.3±1.4),Constant-Murley评分平均为(80.5 ±11.1)和(98.1±3.1),Rowe评分平均为(30.4±8.7)和(92.8±15.2).除体侧外旋术前和术后差异无统计学意义外,其余各项结果差异均有统计学意义.终末随访时有1例患者曾出现肩关节半脱位.随访时发现残存恐惧试验阳性3例(占7.5%).所有患者均恢复术前工作,29例(占70.7%)恢复到第一次脱位前的运动水平.结论 肩关节镜下Bankart重建手术是治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的有效方法之一.适当的病例选择、术者的关节镜下操作技术水平及术后长期而严格的功能康复锻炼是手术成功的关键.     

Editorial Commentary: If You Want Your Arthroscopic Bankart Repairs to Be Durable for 10 Years Consider Treating the Hill-Sachs Lesion With Remplissage

Shoulder remplissage (capsulotenodesis) fills the Hill-Sachs lesion on the humeral head with the infraspinatus and posterior capsule to prevent engagement of the lesion with the anterior glenoid rim. Remplissage is particularly effective when combined with a Bankart repair for the scenario of minimal to no glenoid bone loss and the presence of a significant Hill-Sachs lesion. Anyone performing shoulder instability surgery should be familiar with the technique of the remplissage procedure and consider using it liberally it when the situation dictates.     

镜下缝线锚钉修复肩关节上盂唇前后向合并前后延伸损伤的疗效分析

目的 探讨镜下缝线锚钉修复肩关节上盂唇前后向(SLAP)合并前后延伸损伤的疗效.方法 对2007年3月至2009年4月肩关节镜下缝线锚钉修复的12例盂唇SLAP合并前后延伸损伤患者的资料进行回顾性分析,男7例,女5例;年龄18～40岁,平均28.7岁;均为复合多向不稳定.镜下缝线锚钉治疗肩关节盂唇SLAP Ⅴ型损伤(Bankart损伤+SLAPⅡ型损伤)7例、SLAPⅧ型损伤(SLAPⅡ型损伤合并后下方盂唇撕裂)3例及SLAPⅢ型合并前后盂唇撕裂脱位2例.术前及术后随访均采用美国肩肘外科协会(ASES)评分、视觉模拟评分(VAS)及Constant-Murley评分评定疗效.结果 所有患者术后获11～22个月(平均17个月)随访.术前及末次随访时肩关节平均前屈上举分别为163.4°±8.6°和169.7°±4 2°;外展90°外旋为58.5°±13.6°和90.3°±5.5°;术后外展90°,患侧外旋角度较健侧受限8.4°±6 2°.术前及末次随访ASES评分分别为(77.4±3.7)分和(94.3±2.6)分,VAS评分分别为(7.2±1.4)分和(1.2±0.6)分,Constant-Murley评分分别为(78.1±4.6)分和(93.9±3.7)分,以上指标比较差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05).术后未发生再脱位,均重返伤前工作岗位.结论 严重SLAP合并前后延伸损伤诊断困难,镜下能明确损伤类型,及时治疗,创伤小,并发症少,功能恢复快.