Evaluation of a low to middle tar/medium nicotine cigarette designed to maintain nicotine delivery to the smoker

A specific objective of this 6-week crossover study was to determine how 21 regular smokers of middle tar cigarettes changed their smoking behaviour and uptake of smoke constituents, when switching to either lower tar cigarettes capable of delivering amounts of nicotine similar to a conventional middle tar cigarette (maintained nicotine product), or to conventional low tar/low nicotine cigarettes. Subjects visited the laboratory every 2 weeks for detailed assessment of their smoking behaviour. Weekly per capita consumption was similar for all three cigarettes. They were smoked with variable intensities (low tar > maintained nicotine > middle tar), the tendency being for larger puff volumes, faster puffing and increased puff duration with the low tar cigarettes. The maintained nicotine cigarette was preferred to the middle tar cigarette, although acceptability ratings of the three cigarettes only differed marginally. The nicotine absorbed from the maintained nicotine and middle tar cigarettes was similar and significantly greater than the levels achieved from the low tar cigarettes. Intake of carbon monoxide into the mouth and absorption into the blood stream was lower for the maintained nicotine cigarette than for the middle tar cigarette, with the low tar cigarette occupying an intermediate position. Derived estimates of tar intake suggested reduced intake of tar into the respiratory tract (around 25%) from the maintained nicotine product relative to the middle tar product. The possible advantages of switching to maintained nicotine cigarettes is discussed.     

Effects of smoking abstinence and chain-smoking on puffing topography and diurnal nicotine exposure.

Effects of chain-smoking, a 15-h smoking abstinence, and the nicotine yield of cigarettes on puff indices were studied in eight healthy smokers by using a controlled crossover study design. Puff parameters were measured puff by puff with a portable measuring device when 10 or 20 cigarettes, with nicotine yields of 0.3 and 1.0 mg, were smoked per day. The interval between sessions was 1 h, and the 20 cigarettes per day were chain-smoked 2 at a time. Serum cotinine indicated that smokers compensate completely for the lower nicotine delivery from the 0.3-mg cigarette. Smokers almost doubled total puff volume per cigarette and per day mainly by taking more puffs from the low-nicotine cigarettes and slightly prolonging puff duration. However, nicotine deprivation and chain-smoking had a relatively minor effect on puffing indices with both brands, a fact that agrees poorly with the nicotine titration hypothesis. However, in the course of every single cigarette of the day smokers significantly reduced puff duration and puff volume toward the end of the cigarette, which probably involves satiation of the nicotine crave but may also be due to changes in taste of the smoke.     

How does puffing behavior alter during the smoking of a single cigarette?

We examined changes in puffing behavior during the course of a single cigarette in 76 subjects seen on 6 occasions each (456 cigarettes). The puff volume fell on average by 33% during a cigarette and puff duration by 39%, the interpuff interval rose by 75%, but the pressure drop and the maximum flow and pressure achieved during puffing hardly changed. There were highly significant differences between subjects but not between sessions, or when subjects were grouped according to tar yield of the cigarette or by sex. Individual puff volumes with a single cigarette were highly correlated with puff duration (except in a few individuals with irregular puffing patterns), but not generally with maximum flow rate, suggesting that most smokers reduce volume by taking shorter puffs. This is unlikely to reflect mechanical factors or smoke temperature, and may be a response to changing smoke composition. Variation in puffing patterns between individuals may reflect differences in sensitivity to smoke components and individuals who show little fall in puff volume also show small responses on switching to cigarettes with different tar and nicotine yields. The individual response to smoke might be assessed by an analysis of puffing on a single cigarette.     

Machine-smoking studies of cigarette filter color to estimate tar yield by visual assessment and through the use of a colorimeter

This paper explores using the intensity of the stain on the end of the filter (“filter color”) as a vehicle for estimating cigarette tar yield, both by instrument reading of the filter color and by visual comparison to a template. The correlation of machine-measured tar yield to filter color measured with a colorimeter was reasonably strong and was relatively unaffected by different puff volumes or different tobacco moistures. However, the correlation of filter color to machine-measured nicotine yield was affected by the moisture content of the cigarette. Filter color, as measured by a colorimeter, was generally comparable to filter extraction of either nicotine or solanesol in its correlation to machine-smoked tar yields. It was found that the color of the tar stain changes over time. Panelists could generally correctly order the filters from machine-smoked cigarettes by tar yield using the intensity of the tar stain. However, there was considerable variation in the panelist-to-panelist tar yield estimates. The wide person-to-person variation in tar yield estimates, and other factors discussed in the text could severely limit the usefulness and practicality of this approach for visually estimating the tar yield of machine-smoked cigarettes.     

New lower nicotine cigarettes can produce compensatory smoking and increased carbon monoxide exposure

Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) are marketed as a means to reduce exposure to tobacco toxicants. Quest cigarettes, a new type of PREP, use genetically modified tobacco to provide a nicotine step-down approach, and are available as 0.6, 0.3 and 0.05 mg nicotine cigarettes. However, these cigarettes deliver equivalent levels of tar (10 mg). Prior research on low nicotine cigarettes suggests smokers will compensate for lower nicotine delivery by increasing their puffing behavior to extract more nicotine. This study tested the hypothesis that compensatory smoking will occur with this PREP as nicotine levels decrease, increasing exposure to tobacco toxins. Fifty smokers completed a within-subject human laboratory study investigating the effect of cigarette nicotine level on smoking behavior. Cigarette nicotine level was double-blinded and order of presentation counter-balanced. Breath carbon monoxide (CO) boost was used as a biomarker of smoke exposure; total puff volume to assess smoking behavior. Total puff volume was greatest for the 0.05 mg nicotine cigarette and CO boost was moderately greater after smoking the 0.3 and 0.05 mg cigarettes compared to the 0.6 mg nicotine cigarette. These data provide novel behavioral and biochemical evidence of compensatory smoking when smoking lower nicotine cigarettes. Although marketed as a PREP, increases in CO boost suggest this product can potentially be a harm-increasing product.     

Smoking behaviour and compensation: a review of the literature

Rationale: Compensation or compensatory smoking, accurately defined, deals with the question of whether switching to cigarette brands with different smoke yields is associated with a change in smoke uptake proportional to the change in machine-derived yields. The issue of compensation is important because it bears on whether switching to ”lighter” brands means lower overall smoke intake or not. Objectives: The present review investigated whether and to what extend low yield cigarettes are smoked more intensively. In addition, published data on whether nicotine, ”tar”, or any other smoke constituent or property influence compensational smoking are summarized. Methods: The studies on compensation were classified as follows: (1) studies on smoking behaviour in relation to cigarette yields (with and without brand switching); (2) studies on compensation for nicotine (switching between cigarettes which differ ”only” in their nicotine yield, nicotine supplementation, manipulation of renal nicotine excretion, administration of nicotine agonists or antagonists); (3) studies on compensation for other factors (influence of tar, taste, irritation, draw resistance). In order to quantify the degree of compensation, an index is defined and applied to selected brand switching studies. This compensation index determines, in relative units, the degree to which a smoker responds to a change in smoke yields with a change in smoke uptake measured by suitable biomarkers. The role of vent blocking is also briefly discussed. Results: Most of the studies which compare the smoking behaviour when smoking cigarettes with different smoke yields supply evidence for ”partial” compensation, suggesting that cigarettes with lower yields are smoked more intensively than those with higher yields. These studies also show that a change in the daily number of cigarettes is not a common mechanism of compensation. Effective vent blocking during smoking is a rare event and can therefore also be regarded as an uncommon mechanism of compensation. Evaluation of a suitable subset of brand-switching studies revealed an average compensation of 50–60% of the nicotine yield. Compensation tended to be more complete when changing to cigarettes with higher yields than when changing to cigarettes with lower yields. In general, brand-switching studies do not supply information on the underlying causal factors responsible for compensatory smoking. Results of the nicotine supplementation studies are not conclusive: some report evidence of nicotine titration, others do not. A general problem with this type of investigation is that continuous nicotine application does not mimic the spike-wise application with cigarette smoking, and may lead to nicotine tolerance. There is limited evidence that cigarettes were smoked more intensively when the urinary clearance of nicotine was increased. A small number of studies provide some evidence that smoking intensity increased after smokers were administered a nicotine antagonist. Several reports indicate that tar, taste and sensory properties of the smoke as well as the draw resistance of the cigarette may play a role in compensatory smoking. Low-yield cigarettes usually have reduced pressure drops which smoke researchers have suggested leads to increased puff volume. This effect seems to be independent of the smoke yield of the cigarette. There is also some evidence that some smokers maintain a consistent pattern of smoking which works independent of any changes in nicotine or tar yields, taste or design features of the cigarette (”functional autonomy”). Conclusions: The available data suggest that smokers partially compensate for a different smoke yield. While the factors and their interaction responsible for compensational smoking are not fully understood, there are data suggesting that a subgroup of smokers may partially compensate for nicotine. Even in this subgroup of smokers, however, the relative importance of the pharmacological versus the sensory effects of nicotine in smoke remains to be determined. Received: 4 January 1999 / Final version: 22 March 1999     

Smoke yield of cigarettes and puffing behavior in men and women

Puffing behavior (number of puffs, puff interval, puff duration, peak pressure, latency to peak pressure, average and total puff volume) was measured in 67 dependent male and 43 dependent female smokers when they smoked two cigarettes of their habitual brand under laboratory conditions. Test-retest reliability for the two cigarettes was high, and factor analysis showed that puff shape, puff volume, and puff frequency accounted for about 50% of variation obtained with the different puffing variables. Expiratory tidal CO levels increased with the number of cigarettes smoked before the tests and with the intensity of the smoking habit, but pre- to postsmoking tidal CO differences were similar for smokers of all types of cigarettes (0.1–1.7 mg standard machine smoking nicotine yield). Volume compensation for differences of smoke yield of the cigarettes was generally more pronouced in women than in men and, additionally, it was more pronounced for cigarettes with standard smoke nicotine yield below 0.9 mg than for cigarettes with standard smoke nicotine yield above 0.9 mg for both sexes. Only for women, partial correlation procedures suggested that nicotine might be more important in determining puffing behavior than CO and condensate yield, but there were also no women smoking the strongest cigarettes (1.3–1.7 mg nicotine yield). For both sexes, no compensation by adjusting the number of cigarettes smoked daily was obtained. Personality ratings, pulmonary functions, and cardiovascular functions were not, or only inconsistently, correlated with puffing behavior or type of cigarette.     

Puffing behavior during the smoking of a single cigarette in a naturalistic environment.

The 36 participants in this study were habitual low-yield cigarette smokers, medium-yield cigarette smokers, and switchers from medium- to low-yield cigarettes. All participants smoked both low- (0.4 mg) and medium-nicotine (0.9 mg) cigarettes during the study. Puffing indices were recorded during the first two cigarettes, after an overnight abstinence of smoking, by a portable flowmeter processor unit in a naturalistic environment. The puff volumes per cigarette and per day were significantly lower while switching to higher-yield cigarettes, mainly due to a decrease in the number of puffs and longer interpuff intervals, but also due to a decline in puff duration and flow rate. However, the downregulation by puff volume was incomplete, at most two thirds, as calculated by machine smoking yields. Within the course of smoking a single cigarette, the flow rate was quite stable, puff duration and puff volume decreased toward the end of the cigarette, and interpuff interval was longest during the middle of the cigarette. Total puff volumes per cigarette were similar in the first two cigarettes of the day after an overnight abstinence of smoking, with no significant differences in other puff parameters. Diurnal cotinine excretion revealed that nicotine titration in switching situations was very accurate among switchers and medium-yield cigarette smokers, but not among the low-yield cigarette smokers, and so called oversmoking was found with the higher-nicotine brand. Preferred cigarette type had little effect on the puffing patterns of smokers in single cigarettes.     

The linear relationship between cigarette tar and nicotine yields: regulatory implications for smoke constituent ratios

Cigarette smoke analyte yields are often expressed as ratios relative to tar or nicotine yields, usually to compare different products or to estimate human uptake of smoke in relation to nicotine uptake measurements. The method, however, can lead to distorted interpretations, especially in the case of ratios from ultra-low tar yield cigarettes. In brief, as tar yields decrease below the 5–6 mg per cigarette range, the tar-to-nicotine ratio (TNR) decreases rapidly in a non-linear fashion. If, however, the nicotine yield, rather than the ratio, is plotted versus the tar yield, the non-linearity disappears and a straight line is obtained, with a slight positive intercept for nicotine on the ordinate. Unlike the ratio, the slope appears to depend only on the concentration of the nicotine in the blend and does not appear to vary with smoking parameters such as puff volume, puff interval or length smoked or with cigarette design parameters such as length, circumference or the amount of filtration or filter ventilation. Therefore, such a slope is analogous to the TNR although, unlike that ratio, it is invariant. Even more simply, the concentration of the nicotine in the blend, at least for American blend-style cigarettes, provides a similar index.     

Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions

The study objectives were to determine the effects of smoking machine puffing parameters on mainstream smoke composition and to express those effects as predicting relationships. Forty-eight commercial Philip Morris USA and Philip Morris International cigarettes from international markets and the 1R4F reference cigarette were machine-smoked using smoking conditions defined by the International Organization of Standardization (ISO), the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH), and Health Canada (HC). Cigarette tobacco fillers were analyzed for nitrate, nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA), and ammonia. Mainstream yields for tar and 44 individual smoke constituents and "smoke pH" were determined. Cigarette constituent yields typically increased in the order ISO相似文献   

Influence of cigarette circumference on smoke chemistry,biological activity,and smoking behaviour

Cigarettes with reduced circumference are increasingly popular in some countries, hence it is important to understand the effects of circumference reduction on their burning behaviour, smoke chemistry and bioactivity. Reducing circumference reduces tobacco mass burn rate, puff count and static burn time, and increases draw resistance and rod length burned during puff and smoulder periods. Smoulder temperature increases with decreasing circumference, but with no discernible effect on cigarette ignition propensity during a standard test. At constant packing density, mainstream (MS) and sidestream (SS) tar and nicotine yields decrease approximately linearly with decreasing circumference, as do the majority of smoke toxicants. However, volatile aldehydes, particularly formaldehyde, show a distinctly non-linear relationship with circumference and increases in the ratios of aldehydes to tar and nicotine have been observed as the circumference decreases. Mutagenic, cytotoxic and tumorigenic specific activities of smoke condensates (i.e. per unit weight of condensate) decrease as circumference decreases. Recent studies suggest that there is no statistical difference in mouth-level exposure to tar and nicotine among smokers of cigarettes with different circumferences. Commercially available slim cigarettes usually have changes in other cigarette design features compared with cigarettes with standard circumference, so it is difficult to isolate the effect of circumference on the properties of commercial products. However, available data shows that changes in cigarette circumference offer no discernible change to the harm associated with smoking.     

Smoking behavior in low-yield cigarette smokers and switchers in the natural environment.

Urinary cotinine and puffing parameters were studied in 36 smoking students. Three smoking groups, formed according to the tar content of their preferred cigarette, were compared. Eighteen students had always smoked low-yield, 10 medium-yield and 8 were switchers from medium- to low-yield cigarettes. The subjects smoked their preferred brand (the first week), low-yield cigarettes (the second week) and medium-yield cigarettes (the third week). Day urine samples were collected for cotinine analysis during the two last days of the test weeks. Puffing indices were reported on the last day of every test week with a portable microcomputer assisted analyzer with flowhead cigarette holder. Urinary cotinine concentrations were rather constant within the groups, but lower among the low-yield cigarette smokers as compared to the switchers (p less than 0.05). Also the female smokers had lower cotinine concentrations than the male smokers (p less than 0.05). The compensatory behavior seen in every smoking group while they were smoking low-yield cigarettes was based on up-regulation in single puff volume, puff duration and total smoking time when compared to values with medium-yield cigarettes. The correlation between cotinine concentration and diurnal puff volume (1/day) was poor. It is concluded that the benefit possibly gained with low-yield cigarettes is not long lasting.     

Relationship between cigarette format and mouth-level exposure to tar and nicotine in smokers of Russian king-size cigarettes

Differences in length and circumference of cigarettes may influence smoker behaviour and exposure to smoke constituents. Superslim king-size (KSSS) cigarettes (17 mm circumference versus 25 mm circumference of conventional king-size [KS] cigarettes), have gained popularity in several countries, including Russia. Some smoke constituents are lower in machine-smoked KSSS versus KS cigarettes, but few data exist on actual exposure in smokers. We investigated mouth-level exposure (MLE) to tar and nicotine in Russian smokers of KSSS versus KS cigarettes and measured smoke constituents under machine-smoking conditions. MLE to tar was similar for smokers of 1 mg ISO tar yield products, but lower for smokers of 4 mg and 7 mg KSSS versus KS cigarettes. MLE to nicotine was lower in smokers of 4 mg KSSS versus KS cigarettes, but not for other tar bands. No gender differences were observed for nicotine or tar MLE. Under International Organization for Standardization, Health Canada Intense and Massachusetts regimes, KSSS cigarettes tended to yield less carbon monoxide, acetaldehyde, nitric oxide, acrylonitrile, benzene, 1,3-butadiene and tobacco-specific nitrosamines, but more formaldehyde, than KS cigarettes. In summary, differences in MLE were observed between cigarette formats, but not systematically across pack tar bands.     

Estimation of mouth level exposure to smoke constituents of cigarettes with different tar levels using filter analysis

A nicotine part-filter method can be applied to estimate smokers’ mouth level exposure (MLE) to smoke constituents. The objectives of this study were (1) to generate calibration curves for 47 smoke constituents, (2) to estimate MLE to selected smoke constituents using Japanese smokers of commercially available cigarettes covering a wide range of International Organization for Standardization tar yields (1–21 mg/cigarette), and (3) to investigate relationships between MLE estimates and various machine-smoking yields. Five cigarette brands were machine-smoked under 7 different smoking regimes and smoke constituents and nicotine content in part-filters were measured. Calibration curves were then generated. Spent cigarette filters were collected from a target of 50 smokers for each of the 15 brands and a total of 780 filters were obtained. Nicotine content in part-filters was then measured and MLE to each smoke constituent was estimated. Strong correlations were identified between nicotine content in part-filters and 41 out of the 47 smoke constituent yields. Estimates of MLE to acetaldehyde, acrolein, 1,3-butadiene, benzene, benzo[a]pyrene, carbon monoxide, and tar showed significant negative correlations with corresponding constituent yields per mg nicotine under the Health Canada Intense smoking regime, whereas significant positive correlations were observed for N-nitrosonornicotine and (4-methylnitrosoamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone.     

Applications of some physical indicators of cigarette smoking

Since abstinence may be an unrealistic goal for some smokers, the use of presumably less-hazardous, low-yield cigarettes has been recommended. A cigarette is called low-yield if it delivers small amounts of tar and nicotine in a standard smoking-machine assay. Unfortunately, machine-smoked yields are poor predictors of a smoker's exposure to the toxic ingredients in tobacco. Many smokers who smoke low-yield cigarettes are not actually low-yield smokers, in that they use any of a number of compensatory smoking techniques to increase the yields of their cigarettes. Compensatory smoking often takes place without the awareness of the smoker and can be very difficult for the smoker to monitor, even if trying to do so. Physical indicators of tobacco use should be applied by smokers who are trying to reduce their exposure to tobacco. In particular, the application of information to be found in heart-rate changes and in changes in the appearance of spent filters is discussed. The smoking of low-yield cigarettes should be recommended only when low-yield smoking has been confirmed in the individual smoker.     

Analytical cigarette yields as predictors of smoke bioavailability

The smoke intake of 865 undisturbed smokers of over 10 cigarettes per day was measured using plasma nicotine and cotinine, and expired carbon monoxide (CO) as markers. While nicotine yields, according to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) analytical standards, varied 16-fold from 0.1 to 1.6 mg/cigarette, the corresponding plasma nicotine values varied from around 25 to 45 ng/ml, and estimated mean nicotine intake of smokers varied from around 0.75 to 1.25 mg/cigarette. Expired CO and plasma cotinine values also varied in similar proportion, but mean daily cigarette consumption was independent of the FTC nicotine yield of the cigarettes smoked. The results indicate that pharmacodynamic satiation causes behavioral regulation, and that smokers of very high yield brands compensate downward, and vice versa. The ratio of tar yield to nicotine yield usually increases with increasing tar yield; therefore tar intake is likely to increase at higher tar yields, even though the increment of nicotine intake is small. It follows that FTC analytical determinations are poor predictors of relative intake of nicotine, CO, or tar, while rankings based on mean tar-to-nicotine ratio of a brand's smoke could be more meaningful. Moreover, the considerable variation of individual smoking behavior suggests that precise numerical rankings of cigarettes are not justified. An analogic ranking of cigarettes into a few broad classes would better reflect the realities and expectations of average consumers.     

Puffing topography as a determinant of smoke exposure

Puffing topography variables were measured in a well-characterized, male population smoking their own brand of cigarette. Of the puffing topography variables, interpuff interval appeared to be the primary determinant of blood concentrations of smoke constituents: however, preliminary data in a homogeneous population according to the nicotine yield of their cigarette suggest that total puff volume per cigarette may also be a significant determinant of blood levels of smoke constituents. Smokers of low nicotine yield cigarettes partially compensated for these lower yields by increasing the total volume puffed per cigarette. Observed differences in puffing topography associated with increased daily cigarette consumption and cumulative smoking history were consistent with a higher smoke exposure per cigarette. Further, although both alcohol and coffee consumption are associated with present and cumulative smoking history, coffee consumption is uniquely associated with differences in puffing topography consistent with a higher smoke exposure per cigarette. However, by multiple regression analyses, neither coffee nor alcohol consumption histories added significantly to the prediction of blood concentrations of smoke constituents over that obtained by smoking history and puffing topography.     

Cigarette smoking as a risk for cardiovascular disease V: Biochemical parameters with increased and decreased nicotine content cigarettes

Cigarette smokers were assessed for customary smoking behavior and then were assigned a cigarette which was 0.4 mg higher or lower in nicotine and after 4 weeks, were returned to their customary brand. Biochemical indices of smoking behavior including blood carboxyhemoglobin (COHb), plasma nicotine, cotinine and thiocyanate (-SCN) were measured every 2 weeks. When nicotine availability was increased, smokers received an increased nicotine bolus per puff as determined by plasma nicotine and did not alter smoking topography or cigarettes per day. Over the 4 weeks, plasma cotinine increased without corresponding increases in COHb and -SCN. The return to standard brand resulted in declining cotinine levels but increasing COHb and -SCN, suggesting altered inhalation patterns. In smokers switched to a low yield cigarette, there was a decrease in the nicotine obtained per cigarette followed by a steady rise in plasma cotinine, -SCN and blood COHb over the 4-week period. A positive correlation was observed between cotinine and the gas phase constituents during the change to lower yield and back to standard brand cigarettes. These results indicate that cigarette smokers compensate for decreased nicotine yield with concomitant increases in gas phase components. In addition, increased nicotine availability results in an increased body burden of nicotine and “tar,” but not gas phase constituents. The relative risks of cardiovascular disease under these two situations, which increase exposure to nicotine or gas phase components, deserve careful consideration.     

Estimating the hazards of "less hazardous" cigarettes. III. A study of the effect of various smoking conditions on yields of hydrogen cyanide and cigarette tar

A brand of cigarette with nominal tar and nicotine yields of 4.0 mg and 0.4 mg, respectively, was examined under various machine-smoked conditions that reflect the wide range of human smoking behavior. Three levels of each of five smoking parameters--butt length, puff duration, puff interval, puff volume, and ventilation occlusion--were examined, and the effects on puff number and total particulate matter (TPM) as well as gas phase, particulate phase, and total HCN yields were estimated. Yields of hydrogen cyanide (a ciliatoxic agent) and TPM varied significantly under different smoking conditions. Ventilation occlusion had the most pronounced effect, accounting for 34% of the response variation of TPM yields and 42% of the response variation for total hydrogen cyanide yields. In the survey of available brands, total hydrogen cyanide yields varied from 2 to 233 micrograms/cigarette for the 115 brands tested, a range less than that observed for a single brand smoked under various nonstandard conditions, providing a possible explanation for the previously noted lack of correspondence between HCN yields under standard conditions and levels of thiocyanate in samples of smokers' plasma and saliva. In addition, hydrogen cyanide yields and efficiency of filters in removing HCN were examined under standard smoking conditions. Acetate filters, the most common variety, were found to remove an average of about 14% of the hydrogen cyanide from the mainstream smoke.     

Nicotine or tar titration in cigarette smoking behavior?

A significant problem in assessing the relative relevance of nicotine and tar yield for compensatory smoking after switching from high to low yield cigarettes is that nicotine and tar yield are highly intercorrelated across conventional cigarettes and that the tar/nicotine ratios vary only within a modest range. A better differentiation between the impacts of nicotine and tar yield was expected by comparing in a laboratory experiment a new low nicotine/medium tar cigarette (Next) with conventional low nicotine/low tar (ultra-light) cigarettes and with medium nicotine/medium tar cigarettes with respect to nicotine absorption and physiological effects. Twelve females, habitually smoking medium type cigarettes (0.7 mg nicotine) participated in the study. Neither the number of cigarettes smoked under field conditions nor the puffing behavior during the laboratory experiment differed between the three types of cigarettes. In the laboratory, Next produced only very small increases in plasma nicotine and changes in cardiovascular or EEG measures, whereas the effects of the medium cigarettes were in the expected range and those of the ultra-light cigarettes about halfway in between. The nicotine absorption/nicotine yield and the CO absorption/CO yield ratios were similar for Next and the habitual cigarettes, but about twofold higher for the ultra-light cigarettes. This suggests that gustatory and olfactory sensations, which are supposed to be more dependent on tar than on nicotine yield, may play a greater role for the regulation of smoking behavior than hitherto believed.