Effect of synergistic wrist motion on adhesion formation after repair of partial flexor digitorum profundus tendon lacerations in a canine model in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Therapy employing passive finger flexion and active finger extension with the wrist fixed in flexion is commonly used after flexor tendon repair. However, this method of rehabilitation may not produce full tendon excursion because of buckling of the tendon within its sheath with passive flexion. Studies of cadavera suggest that the use of synergistic wrist and finger motion may improve tendon gliding. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of passive digital motion, performed with either wrist fixation or synergistic wrist motion, on adhesion and gap formation after flexor tendon repair. METHODS: Sixty-six dogs were randomly allocated to two groups. In each group, two flexor digitorum profundus tendons of one forepaw were partially (80%) lacerated and then repaired with a modified Kessler suture. In each group, a different postoperative therapy (wrist fixation or synergistic motion) was performed twice daily. The dogs were killed at one week, three weeks, or six weeks after surgery, and the repaired tendons were evaluated to determine the adhesion grade and adhesion breaking strength. RESULTS: The synergistic motion group had a significantly lower adhesion grade and significantly less adhesion breaking strength than the wrist fixation group at three and six weeks (p < 0.05). At one week, there was no significant difference between the two therapy groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Passive digital flexion and extension with synergistic wrist motion was an effective therapy after repair of partial zone-2 lacerations in a canine model.     

Active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair: comparison of results following injuries in zone 2 and other zones

PURPOSE: To prospectively study the role of active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair. METHODS: The standard modified Kessler's technique was used to repair 46 digits in 32 patients with flexor tendon injuries. Early active mobilisation of the repaired digit was commenced on the third postoperative day. Range of movement was monitored and recovery from injury in zone 2 was compared with injury in other zones. RESULTS: There were 24 and 22 injuries in zone 2 and other zones respectively. The total active motion score of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand was measured. Patients with zone-2 injuries achieved similar results to those with other-zone injuries apart from a 3-week delay in recovery. The final results were good to excellent in 71% and 77% of zone-2 and other-zone cases respectively (p < 0.05). There were 2 ruptures in zone-2 and one rupture in zone-3 repairs (6.5%). CONCLUSION: Preliminary results of this study showed that active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair provides comparable clinical results and is as safe as conventional mobilisation programmes although recovery in patients with zone-2 injury was delayed.     

Friction of the gliding surface. Implications for tendon surgery and rehabilitation.

Finger flexor tendon rehabilitation has come a long way, but further advances are possible. Ideally, a healing tendon should move, but under the minimum load necessary to achieve motion. It is possible to design suture repairs that minimize the friction between tendon and sheath while simultaneously maintaining adequate strength to provide a wide margin of safety during therapy. A looped, four-strand modified Kessler repair is a good example of this type of high-strength, low-friction repair. At the same time, rehabilitation methods can also be optimized. A new modified synergistic motion protocol is described in which wrist flexion and finger extension is alternated with wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint extension and finger interphalangeal joint flexion. Based on evidence from basic science studies, the authors hypothesize that this new protocol will deliver more effective proximal tension on the tendon repair than either passive flexion/active extension or synergistic protocols, and may be useful in patients who are not ready for, or are not reliable with, active motion or place and hold protocols. The scientific basis for these new methods is reviewed, and the concept of the "safe zone" for tendon loading, in which tendon motion occurs without gapping of the repair site, is developed.     

Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome after repair of zone I flexor tendon injuries using either the pullout button technique or suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2002 we treated 26 consecutive zone I flexor tendon injuries. Thirteen patients had repairs from 1998 to 2000 using a modified pullout button technique (group A) and 13 patients had repair using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx (group B). Patient characteristics were similar for both groups. The same postoperative flexor tendon rehabilitation protocol and follow-up schedule were used for both groups. Evaluation included range of motion, sensibility and grip strength, failure, complications, and return to work. The Student t test was used to determine significant differences. RESULTS: All patients completed 1 year of follow-up evaluation. There were 2 infections in group A that resolved with oral antibiotics and no infections in group B. There were no tendon repair failures and no repeat surgeries in either group. At final follow-up evaluation there were no statistically significant differences for the following end points: sensibility (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing and 2-point discrimination), active range of motion (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined motion), flexion contracture (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined contracture), and grip strength (injured tendon as a percent of the contralateral uninjured tendon). The suture anchor group had a statistically significant improvement for time to return to work. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the clinical outcome after flexor tendon repair using either suture anchors or the pullout button technique. A significant improvement was found for time to return to work for repairs using the suture anchor technique. Flexor tendon repair can be achieved using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx, thereby avoiding the potential morbidity associated with the pullout button technique. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.     

Biomechanic comparison of the Teno Fix tendon repair device with the cruciate and modified Kessler techniques

PURPOSE: To compare the mechanical behavior of a novel internal tendon repair device with commonly used 2-strand and 4-strand repair techniques for zone II flexor tendon lacerations. METHODS: Thirty cadaveric flexor digitorum profundus tendons were randomized to 1 of 3 core sutures: (1) cruciate locked 4-strand technique, (2) modified Kessler 2-strand core suture technique, or (3) Teno Fix multifilament wire tendon repair device. Each repair was tested in the load control setting on a Instron controller coupled to an MTS materials testing machine load frame by using an incremental cyclic linear loading protocol. A differential variable reluctance transducer was used to record displacement across the repair site. Cyclic force (n-cycles) to 1-mm gap and repair failure was recorded using serial digital photography. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in differential variable reluctance transducer displacement between the cruciate, modified Kessler, and Teno Fix repairs. The cruciate repair had greater resistance to visual 1-mm repair-site gap formation and repair-site failure when compared with the Kessler and Teno Fix repairs. No significant difference was found between the modified Kessler repair and the Teno Fix repair. In all specimens, the epitenon suture failed before the core suture. Repair failure occurred by suture rupture in the 7 cruciate specimens that failed, with evidence of gap formation before failure. Seven of 10 modified Kessler repairs failed by suture rupture. All of the Teno Fix repairs failed by pullout of the metal anchor. CONCLUSIONS: The Teno Fix repair system did not confer a mechanical advantage over the locked cruciate or modified Kessler suture techniques for zone II lacerations in cadaveric flexor tendons during cyclic loading in a linear testing model. This information may help to define safe boundaries for postoperative rehabilitation when using this internal tendon repair device.     

Device for zone-II flexor tendon repair. A multicenter, randomized, blinded, clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The stainless-steel Teno Fix tendon-repair device has improved biomechanical characteristics compared with those of suture repair, and it was well tolerated in a canine model. The purpose of this study was to compare the Teno Fix with suture repair in a clinical setting. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with isolated zone-II flexor tendon injury were randomized to be treated with a Teno Fix or a four-stranded cruciate suture repair. There were eighty-five injured digits: thirty-four were treated with the Teno Fix, and fifty-one served as controls. A modified Kleinert rehabilitation technique was employed, with active flexion starting at four weeks postoperatively. Patients were followed for six months by blinded observers who determined the range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, pinch and grip strength, and pain score on a verbal scale and assessed swelling and neurologic recovery. Adverse outcomes, including device migration and rupture, were monitored at frequent intervals. RESULTS: Nine of the fifty-one suture repairs ruptured, whereas none of the Teno Fix repairs ruptured (p < 0.01). Five of the nine ruptures were caused by resistive motion against medical advice. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of range of motion, DASH score, pinch and grip strength, pain, swelling, or neurologic recovery. The Teno Fix group had slightly slower resolution of pain and swelling compared with the control group. Of the patients who were available for follow-up at six months, sixteen of the twenty-four treated with a Teno Fix repair and nineteen of the twenty-seven treated with a control repair had a good or excellent result. One Teno Fix device migrated and extruded secondary to a wound infection. Of all eighty-five digits that were operated on, four were thought to have tendons of inadequate size to accommodate the device and nine were deemed to have inadequate exposure to allow placement of the anchors. CONCLUSIONS: The Teno Fix is safe and effective for flexor tendon repair if the tendon size and exposure are sufficient. Tendon repairs with the Teno Fix have lower rupture rates and similar functional outcomes when compared with conventional repair, particularly in patients who are noncompliant with the rehabilitation protocol.     

Outcome of early active mobilization after flexor tendons repair in zones II�CV in hand

Background:

The functional outcome of a flexor tendon injury after repair depends on multiple factors. The postoperative management of tendon injuries has paved a sea through many mobilization protocols. The improved understanding of splinting techniques has promoted the understanding and implication of these mobilization protocols. We conducted a study to observe and record the results of early active mobilization of repaired flexor tendons in zones II–V.

Materials and Methods:

25 cases with 75 digits involving 129 flexor tendons including 8 flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendons in zones II–V of thumb were subjected to the early active mobilization protocol. Eighteen (72%) patients were below 30 years of age. Twenty-four cases (96%) sustained injury by sharp instrument either accidentally or by assault. Ring and little finger were involved in 50% instances. In all digits, either a primary repair (n=26) or a delayed primary repair (n=49) was done. The repair was done with the modified Kessler core suture technique with locking epitendinous sutures with a knot inside the repair site, using polypropylene 3-0/4-0 sutures. An end-to-end repair of the cut nerves was done under loupe magnification using a 6-0/8-0 polyamide suture. The rehabilitation program adopted was a modification of Kleinert’s regimen, and Silfverskiold regimen. The final assessment was done at 14 weeks post repair using the Louisville system of Lister et al.

Results:

Eighteen of excellent results were attributed to ring and little fingers where there was a flexion lag of < 1 cm and an extension lag of < 15°. FPL showed 75% (n=6) excellent flexion. 63% (n=47) digits showed excellent results whereas good results were seen in 19% (n=14) digits. Nine percent (n=7) digits showed fair and the same number showed poor results. The cases where the median (n=4) or ulnar nerve (n=6) or both (n=3) were involved led to some deformity (clawing/ape thumb) at 6 months postoperatively. The cases with digital or common digital nerve involvement (n=7 with 17 digits) showed five excellent, two good, four fair, and six poor results. Complications included tendon ruptures in 2 (3%) cases (one thumb and one ring finger) and contracture in 2 (3%) cases whereas superficial infection and flap necrosis was seen in 1 case each.

Conclusion:

The early active mobilization of cut flexor tendons in zones II–V using the modified mobilization protocol has given good results, with minimal complications.     

Total and intrasynovial work of flexion of human cadaver flexor digitorum profundus tendons after modified Kessler and MGH repair techniques

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare directly the total work of flexion (TWOF) and the intrasynovial work of flexion (IWOF) of human flexor digitorum profundus tendons and to analyze the ratio of the IWOF to the TWOF of human flexor digitorum profundus tendons. These factors may be important clinically in understanding the role of different methods of postoperative tendon rehabilitation for different types of tendon repairs, especially at the early stage after tendon repair. METHODS: Two different tendon repairs, the modified Kessler and the Massachusetts General Hospital, were used in 18 digits from 6 freshly frozen human cadaver hands. The TWOF and the IWOF were tested by using a digit-resistance testing device. RESULTS: After tendon repair the TWOF increased 11.2% and 26.9% for the modified Kessler and MGH groups, respectively. The differences in increase between the 2 groups were significant. The IWOF increased 126.8% and 308.8% for the modified Kessler and Massachusetts General Hospital groups, respectively. The IWOF accounted for 16.4% of the TWOF for the intact tendon; this percentage was 28.6% and 45.0% for the modified Kessler and Massachusetts General Hospital groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The IWOF accounts for 16% of the TWOF of normal human cadaver digits but it accounts for a much higher fraction after tendon repair. The ratio of the work of flexion within the synovial sheath to the TWOF varies depending on the type of repair chosen.     

Die primäre Naht der Fingerbeugesehnen

OBJECTIVE: Flexor tendon repair by direct suture, providing tendon function and mechanical properties and allowing postoperative active extension and flexion. INDICATIONS: Flexor tendon laceration in all zones, when primary healing and a good functional outcome can be expected. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Florid and chronic infection. Lack of skill, instruments, or manpower. Tension-free suture is not feasible. Severe soft-tissue problems. Mantero suture in case of coexistent artery injury. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Hand surgical incisions and approach to the tendon. Opening of the tendon sheath in the region of oblique pulley. A four-strand core suture consisting of two locked two-strand sutures and a circumferential epitendon cross-stitch suture are performed. Lacerations in zone I with a tendon stump shorter than 1 cm require a Mantero suture and avulsions require a pull-out suture technique. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Active flexion and active extension in a dorsal wrist cast. RESULTS: The clinical outcome studies after repair of zone II flexor tendon injuries using a multiple-strand suture technique describe 69-96% excellent and good results.     

Repair of flexor carpi radialis tendon laceration at the wrist in a professional ice hockey player

The flexor carpi radialis is a wrist flexor and radial deviator with half the relative strength of flexor carpi ulnaris. In the majority of patients, the flexor carpi radialis tendon is expendable and is routinely used for various reconstructive procedures about the hand and wrist. Isolated flexor carpi radialis lacerations at the wrist are rare. Flexor carpi radialis tendon ruptures, which have been reported in association with distal radius fractures, longstanding osteoarthritis, and percutaneous treatment of scaphoid fractures, are usually treated non-operatively. We report a case of a traumatic laceration of the flexor carpi radialis tendon at the wrist in a professional ice hockey player. Surgical repair and rehabilitation using established principles for intrasynovial flexor tendon repair allowed return to sport at the professional level in 2 months.Tension-free core suture repair was performed with a modified-Kessler, 4-strand repair using a double-stranded 4-0 Supramid suture. A running epitendinous suture was then placed around the circumference of the tendon with 6-0 Prolene. Immobilization of the wrist in 20° of flexion was maintained for 2 weeks. Full active and passive digital motion was allowed immediately postoperatively and continued throughout the rehabilitation. Therapy was initiated at 2 weeks postoperatively with full passive wrist flexion and passive wrist extension to a dorsal block of 20°. At 4 weeks postoperatively, a dorsal splint was fabricated to keep the wrist in neutral. At this time, active extension to a dorsal block of zero and full passive flexion was allowed. Active wrist flexion without resistance was begun at 6 weeks, and full strengthening was allowed at 8 weeks postoperatively. The patient returned to sport at the professional level shortly thereafter. At latest follow-up, the patient has been able to fully participate in professional ice hockey without pain or functional limitation.     

Rehabilitation after flexor tendon surgery

During the last 20 years there have been significant innovations in injury repair and aftercare for patients who sustain zone 2 flexor injuries. Based on improvements in our understanding of the mechanism of repair, new differentiated concepts could be developed. Active extension, passive flexion as introduced by Kleinert is still the standard in flexor tendon surgery. New stronger suture techniques allow immediate active flexion. The purpose of this article is to review the current concepts of flexor tendon and pulley repair as well as reconstruction of these structures and the rehabilitation programs for tenolysis.     

Early ultrasound therapy for rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair

Background:

In our Institute, most of the patients treated for hand injuries were industrial workers with poor compliance. For rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair, we had tried various early mobilization protocols. As these protocols demanded a degree of commitment from the patients, our results were suboptimal. Hence, to improve the results, we implemented a new rehabilitation protocol by administering the pulsed ultrasound therapy during the early phase of tendon healing.

Materials and Methods:

This is a prospective study done over a period of five years from January 2008 to January 2013. A total of 100 patients and 139 digits with zone II flexor tendon injuries were studied. After randomization, we administered pulsed ultrasound therapy of different frequencies and intensities for a total of 72 patients and 99 digits and formulated three groups. The results of ultrasound treated cases were compared with each other and with the results of cases treated by immobilization protocol. The results were analyzed using ‘Original Strickland’ criteria.

Results:

72% excellent-good results in ultrasound (Group 1) protocol, 75% excellent-good results in ultrasound (Group 2) protocol, and 77% excellent-good results in ultrasound (Group 3) protocol were achieved. There was no case of rupture in the first two groups. The rupture rate was 7% in ultrasound (Group 3) protocol. Only 25% excellent-good results were obtained in the immobilization protocol.

Conclusion:

After zone II flexor tendon repair, pulsed ultrasound therapy during the early rehabilitation phase is safe and effective. The results are comparable to early mobilization protocols.KEY WORDS: Early ultrasound therapy, zone II flexor tendon repair, PIP Joint flexion contracture     

Repair of flexor tendon injuries by four strands cruciate technique versus two strands kessler technique

BackgroundFlexor tendon injuries are commonly encountered and the surgical repair still represents a challenging problem. Many repair techniques are present but there is still no ideal one that achieves the best functional outcome. This study was undertaken to compare four-strand locked cruciate repair technique and modified Kessler technique in forty eight patients by assessing the functional outcome.MethodsForty eight patients (114 digits) with flexor tendon injury were assigned into two groups based on suture repair technique; Group A: 24 cases by Modified Kessler repair (50%). Group B: 24cases by 4-strand cruciate repair (50%). Adults in Both groups were rehabilitated by combined Duran protocol and early active mobilization while no specific rehabilitation program was used for pediatric age group. Follow up was from 6 to 36 months (mean 21.5). Functional outcome was assessed by White criteria to all patients after 6 months.ResultsFunctional outcome was better in 4 strand cruciate repair with excellent result in 66.6%, good in 29.1% and fair in 4.1%, as compared to modified Kessler technique in which excellent results were found in 45.8%, good in 37.5%, fair in 12.5% and poor in 4.1% of cases. A better functional result was achieved in 4 strand cruciate repair especially in zone II, with excellent results in 33.3%, good in 50% and fair in 16.6% of cases, as compared to modified Kessler repair with no excellent results, 33.3% good, 50% fair and 16.6% poor results. In zone III, 4 strand cruciate technique showed a better functional outcome with 77.7% excellent and 22.2% good results, as compared to 55.5% excellent and 44.4% good results found in Modified Kessler repair. Zone V showed almost comparable results between the two types of repairs.ConclusionThe 4-strand cruciate repair technique had better functional outcome compared to modified Kessler repair technique, especially in zone II and III.     

Optimizing independent finger flexion with zone V flexor repairs using the Massachusetts General Hospital flexor tenorrhaphy and early protected active motion

PURPOSE: Independent FDS action has been cited to be problematic with repair of multiple tendons in zone V owing to adhesion formation between the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons. Of the several described flexor repair techniques the ideal tendon repair should be strong enough to allow for early active motion to minimize adhesion formation and maximize tendon healing. Biomechanical studies have proven the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) repair to be strong enough to allow for early active motion. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of the MGH technique for zone V flexor tendon injuries to allow for early protected active motion to achieve independent finger flexion through better differential gliding of the tendons. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review 168 zone V finger flexor tendon repairs for 29 patients performed consecutively over 4 years when early active motion was not contraindicated. The same early protected active motion protocol was used for all of these patients. We reviewed total active motion, independent flexion, rupture, and need for tenolysis. These injuries involved 103 FDS and 65 FDP tendons to 103 fingers. The median follow-up period was 24 weeks. Of these 29 patients 19 were men and 10 were women. The average patient age was 28 years. RESULTS: The total active motion for these zone V repairs was 236 degrees +/- 5 degrees Overall 97 of 103 digits attained good to excellent function and 88 of 103 developed some differential glide. One of these patients required a tenolysis. Three repairs ruptured in 1 patient owing to suture breakage that was associated with noncompliance with the dorsal extension block splint. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective review of 168 consecutive flexor tendon repairs showed that the MGH technique allowed for early protected active motion, which provided good to excellent functional outcomes with 88 of 103 developing independent finger flexion at an acceptably low complication risk.     

Establishment of an in vivo turkey model for the study of flexor tendon repair

Flexor tendon injuries are common and pose a clinical challenge for functional restoration. The purpose of our study was to assess the adequacy of the turkey as a large animal model for flexor tendon injuries in vivo. Twenty‐four male turkeys underwent surgical flexor tendon cut and repair. Turkeys were allocated to five groups postoperatively: (1) foot casted in extension and sacrificed after 3 weeks; (2) foot casted in extension and sacrificed after 6 weeks; (3) foot casted in flexion and sacrificed after 3 weeks; (4) foot casted in flexion and sacrificed after 6 weeks; and (5) foot casted in flexion for 6 weeks and then free roaming allowed for an additional 3 weeks before sacrifice. After sacrifice, digits were collected and analyzed for adhesion formation, healing at the macrolevel and histologically, and biomechanical properties—including friction, work of flexion, stiffness, and strength of repair. All turkeys survived anesthesia and surgery. Tendon rupture occurred in all extension casts and in 11% of those casted in flexion. Friction and work of flexion were significantly higher in the repaired digit than the control digit. There was a correlation between duration of immobilization and repair strength. Histologically, the tendon healed with tenocytes migrating into the gap and producing collagen fibers. We have, for the first time, studied flexor tendon injury and repair using turkeys in terms of anesthesia, surgical procedures, postoperative care, and animal husbandry. The findings regarding functional and histological results from this novel avian model were comparable to the most commonly used mammal model. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:2497–2505, 2018.

     

Clinical results of flexor tendon repair in zone II using a six-strand double-loop technique compared with a two-strand technique

The clinical and functional results of 46 patients who underwent zone II flexor tendon repair using the Lim/Tsai technique combined with the Kleinert/Duran early active mobilisation regime and place and hold exercises were assessed. The results were compared with 25 patients who were treated by the modified Kessler technique and the Kleinert/Duran regime alone. After a follow-up of 8 to 17 weeks, the Lim/Tsai group had a better grip strength and a significantly better total active motion of 141 degrees compared with 123 degrees . The rupture rates (Lim/Tsai: 1/51; Kessler: 3/26) and the extension deficits were not statistically different in the two groups. However, the complication rate was significantly lower and the average time of treatment was significantly shorter in the Lim/Tsai group. These results support the use of the Lim/Tsai six-strand repair technique in zone II flexor tendon injuries and early active mobilisation without rubber-band traction.     

Functional outcome in patients with zone V flexor tendon injuries

Introduction Zone V flexor tendon injuries may involve major nerves and arteries as well as the wrist and finger flexors. Although these injuries are not infrequent, few studies have reported functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome in patients with flexor tendon repairs in zone V.Materials and methods Eighteen patients with repaired zone V flexor tendon injuries were followed up for an average of 20 months. The postoperative rehabilitation program consisted of a combined regime of modified Kleinert and modified Duran techniques. Outcome parameters were hand function according to the Buck-Gramcko assessment system, grip and key pinch strength values, and return to work status.Results Functional results were excellent in 92.8% of the digits, good in 1.4%, and poor in 5.8%. Grip strength recovered to an average of 77% and pinch strength to 74% of the uninjured hand. Two tendon ruptures occurred in a patient, and tenolysis was required in 3 patients. Of 15 patients who were employed at the time of injury, 13 returned to their original occupations.Conclusion Satisfactory functional results can be obtained when proper surgical technique is coupled with careful postoperative management in patients with zone V flexor tendon injuries.     

吻合口无结Kessler缝合法修复指屈肌腱的疗效观察

目的通过与传统Kessler缝合法比较,分析吻合口无结Kessler缝合法修复指屈肌腱的疗效及优势。方法回顾分析2005年2月-2010年2月采用吻合口无结Kessler缝合法治疗的122例163指243根指屈肌腱断裂患者临床资料(试验组),术中一期显微缝合指屈肌腱,修复腱外膜、腱鞘及腱周组织,应用透明质酸钠充填治疗。并与2001年2月-2005年2月采用传统Kessler缝合法治疗的96例130指186根指屈肌腱断裂患者(对照组)临床资料进行比较。两组患者性别、年龄、损伤原因、损伤部位、病程等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。术后3周内采用Kleinert橡皮筋牵引疗法(动态支具保护),并于24 h后开始手指功能锻炼。结果术后试验组2例、对照组5例切口发生感染,经换药后2周愈合;其余患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合。患者均获随访,随访时间6～14个月,平均9个月。术后6个月手指功能采用主动活动度(total active movement,TAM)法评定,试验组TAM为(192.0±13.1)°;其中获优54例,良58例,中8例,差2例,优良率为92%。对照组TAM为(170.0±15.2)°;其中获优23例,良30例,中22例,差21例,优良率为55%。两组TAM比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论吻合口无结Kessler缝合法治疗指屈肌腱断裂,辅以腱外膜、腱鞘及腱周组织修复后,手指功能恢复优于传统Kessler缝合法,但远期疗效仍需进一步观察。     

Zone I flexor tendon rehabilitation with limited extension and active flexion.

This article describes an immediate active motion protocol for primary repair of zone I flexor tendons treated with tendon to tendon, or tendon to bone repair, and reviews clinical results. A rehabilitation protocol is proposed that will limit excursion of the zone I repair by blocking full distal interphalangeal (DIP) extension and by applying controlled active tension to both the unrepaired flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the repaired flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). The rehabilitation technique utilized a dorsal protective splint with a relaxed position of immobilization with 30 degrees of wrist flexion, 40 degrees of metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint flexion, and a neutral position for the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints without dynamic traction. In addition, within the confines of the dorsal splint, the involved DIP joint was splinted at 40-45 degrees to prevent DIP joint extension during the early wound healing phases. Relaxed composite flexion was used to apply active tension to both the uninjured FDS, and the repaired FDP. This technique applies excursion of approximately 3 mm to the zone I tendon in a limited arc (45-75 degrees). The modified position of active flexion applies low loads of force (< 500 g), even with drag considered. This technique is supported by previous mathematical studies of excursion and internal tendon force, and clinical experience. Forty nine cases treated over a 10-year period were reviewed, and eight were excluded for incomplete follow-up. The use of this protocol for 41 zone I flexor digitorum profundus repairs by 12 different surgeons using varied surgical techniques was evaluated. None of the tendon to tendon repairs used more than two suture strands for the core repairs. Mean total active range of motion was 142 degrees (PIP 95 degrees plus DIP 47 degrees), or 81% of normal. Three tendons ruptured in non-protocol-related incidents and were excluded from the study. Results from this clinical study support the use of limited DIP extension combined with active tension with conventional repair in zone I.     

Pulley plasty versus resection of one slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis after repair of both flexor tendons in zone II: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND: The outcome of repair of zone-II lacerations of the flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus tendons remains suboptimal. We investigated the effects of two strategies to improve postoperative gliding in a human cadaveric hand. METHODS: The second, third, and fourth digits were harvested from ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric hands. Complete lacerations and repairs were made to the profundus and superficialis tendons at a location where both repair sites would pass beneath the A2 pulley with the proximal interphalangeal joint in 45 degrees of flexion. The gliding resistance of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon was measured following pulley plasty and following excision of one slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis. The breaking strength of the remaining slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon was then measured. RESULTS: Pulley plasty and resection of one slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon both significantly decreased gliding resistance compared with repair of both slips (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the mean gliding resistance between the pulley plasty and one-slip resection groups. The flexor digitorum superficialis slip was stronger after repair with a Becker suture (28.8 +/- 9.0 N) than after repair with a modified Kessler (16.4 +/- 4.5 N) or a zigzag suture (15.0 +/- 5.7 N). CONCLUSION: Both pulley plasty and resection of one slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis reduce gliding resistance after tendon repair in zone II of the hand.