Prospective, open-label investigation of the pharmacokinetics of daptomycin during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

As methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) becomes more prevalent, vancomycin is becoming increasingly used as a prophylaxis against surgical-site infections for cardiothoracic surgeries. However, vancomycin administration can be challenging, and the pharmacokinetics of alternative antibiotics in this setting are poorly understood. The primary objective of this investigation was to describe the pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We enrolled 15 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Each subject was administered a single open-label dose of daptomycin (8 mg/kg of body weight) for surgical prophylaxis. Fourteen daptomycin plasma samples were collected. Safety outcomes between subjects who received daptomycin and 15 control subjects who received the standard-of-care antibiotic were compared. The mean maximal concentration of daptomycin (C_max) was 84.4 ± 27.1 μg/ml; the mean daptomycin concentration during the cardiopulmonary bypass procedure was 33.2 ± 11.4 μg/ml and was 30.9 ± 12.7 μg/ml at sternum closure. Mean daptomycin concentrations at 12, 18, 24, and 48 h were 22.7 ± 9.7, 16.2 ± 8.2, 12.0 ± 4.7, and 3.5 ± 2.3 μg/ml, respectively. Mean daptomycin concentrations were consistently above the MIC at which 90% of the tested isolates are inhibited (MIC₉₀) for S. aureus and S. epidermidis during the cardiopulmonary bypass procedure. Daptomycin was not associated with surgical-site infections or differences in adverse events compared to findings for control subjects. We found that a single dose of daptomycin at 8 mg/kg was well tolerated and achieved adequate plasma concentrations against common pathogens associated with surgical-site infections after cardiothoracic surgery. Daptomycin may be considered an alternative surgical prophylaxis antibiotic for patients undergoing cardiothoracic bypass surgery who are unable to receive vancomycin.     

Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftaroline Tested against Staphylococci with Reduced Susceptibility to Linezolid,Daptomycin, or Vancomycin from U.S. Hospitals, 2008 to 2011

Vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin are very active against staphylococci, but isolates with decreased susceptibility to these antimicrobial agents are isolated sporadically. A total of 19,350 Staphylococcus aureus isolates (51% methicillin resistant [MRSA]) and 3,270 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were collected consecutively from 82 U.S. medical centers from January 2008 to December 2011 and tested for susceptibility against ceftaroline and comparator agents by the reference broth microdilution method. Among S. aureus strains, 14 isolates (0.07%) exhibited decreased susceptibility to linezolid (MIC, ≥8 μg/ml), 18 (0.09%) to daptomycin (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml), and 369 (1.9%) to vancomycin (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml; 368 isolates at 2 μg/ml and 1 at 4 μg/ml). Fifty-one (1.6%) CoNS were linezolid resistant (MIC, ≥8 μg/ml), and four (0.12%) were daptomycin nonsusceptible (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml). Ceftaroline was very active against S. aureus overall (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 98.5% susceptible), including MRSA (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 97.2% susceptible). All daptomycin-nonsusceptible and 85.7% of linezolid-resistant S. aureus isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. Against S. aureus isolates with a vancomycin MIC of ≥2 μg/ml, 91.9, 96.2, and 98.9% were susceptible to ceftaroline, daptomycin, and linezolid, respectively. CoNS strains were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml; 99.1% inhibited at ≤1 μg/ml), including methicillin-resistant (MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml), linezolid-resistant (MIC_50/90, 0.5/0.5 μg/ml), and daptomycin-nonsusceptible (4 isolates; MIC range, 0.03 to 0.12 μg/ml) strains. In conclusion, ceftaroline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to linezolid, daptomycin, or vancomycin, and it may represent a valuable treatment option for infections caused by these multidrug-resistant staphylococci.     

In Vitro Activities of Cefminox against Anaerobic Bacteria Compared with Those of Nine Other Compounds

The agar dilution MIC method was used to test the activity of cefminox, a β-lactamase-stable cephamycin, compared with those of cefoxitin, cefotetan, moxalactam, ceftizoxime, cefotiam, cefamandole, cefoperazone, clindamycin, and metronidazole against 357 anaerobes. Overall, cefminox was the most active β-lactam, with an MIC at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC₅₀) of 1.0 μg/ml and an MIC₉₀ of 16.0 μg/ml. Other β-lactams were less active, with respective MIC₅₀s and MIC₉₀s of 2.0 and 64.0 μg/ml for cefoxitin, 2.0 and 128.0 μg/ml for cefotetan, 2.0 and 64.0 μg/ml for moxalactam, 4.0 and >128.0 μg/ml for ceftizoxime, 16.0 and >128.0 μg/ml for cefotiam, 8.0 and >128.0 μg/ml for cefamandole, and 4.0 and 128.0 μg/ml for cefoperazone. The clindamycin MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ were 0.5 and 8.0 μg/ml, respectively, and the metronidazole MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ were 1.0 and 4.0 μg/ml, respectively. Cefminox was especially active against Bacteroides fragilis (MIC₉₀, 2.0 μg/ml), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (MIC₉₀, 4.0 μg/ml), fusobacteria (MIC₉₀, 1.0 μg/ml), peptostreptococci (MIC₉₀, 2.0 μg/ml), and clostridia, including Clostridium difficile (MIC₉₀, 2.0 μg/ml). Time-kill studies performed with six representative anaerobic species revealed that at the MIC all compounds except ceftizoxime were bactericidal (99.9% killing) against all strains after 48 h. At 24 h, only cefminox and cefoxitin at 4× the MIC and cefoperazone at 8× the MIC were bactericidal against all strains. After 12 h, at the MIC all compounds except moxalactam, ceftizoxime, cefotiam, cefamandole, clindamycin, and metronidazole gave 90% killing of all strains. After 3 h, cefminox at 2× the MIC produced the most rapid effect, with 90% killing of all strains.     

Activities of Fosfomycin and Rifampin on Planktonic and Adherent Enterococcus faecalis Strains in an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Model

Enterococcal implant-associated infections are difficult to treat because antibiotics generally lack activity against enterococcal biofilms. We investigated fosfomycin, rifampin, and their combinations against planktonic and adherent Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 19433) in vitro and in a foreign-body infection model. The MIC/MBC_log values were 32/>512 μg/ml for fosfomycin, 4/>64 μg/ml for rifampin, 1/2 μg/ml for ampicillin, 2/>256 μg/ml for linezolid, 16/32 μg/ml for gentamicin, 1/>64 μg/ml for vancomycin, and 1/5 μg/ml for daptomycin. In time-kill studies, fosfomycin was bactericidal at 8× and 16× MIC, but regrowth of resistant strains occurred after 24 h. With the exception of gentamicin, no complete inhibition of growth-related heat production was observed with other antimicrobials on early (3 h) or mature (24 h) biofilms. In the animal model, fosfomycin alone or in combination with daptomycin reduced planktonic counts by ≈4 log₁₀ CFU/ml below the levels before treatment. Fosfomycin cleared planktonic bacteria from 74% of cage fluids (i.e., no growth in aspirated fluid) and eradicated biofilm bacteria from 43% of cages (i.e., no growth from removed cages). In combination with gentamicin, fosfomycin cleared 77% and cured 58% of cages; in combination with vancomycin, fosfomycin cleared 33% and cured 18% of cages; in combination with daptomycin, fosfomycin cleared 75% and cured 17% of cages. Rifampin showed no activity on planktonic or adherent E. faecalis, whereas in combination with daptomycin it cured 17% and with fosfomycin it cured 25% of cages. Emergence of fosfomycin resistance was not observed in vivo. In conclusion, fosfomycin showed activity against planktonic and adherent E. faecalis. Its role against enterococcal biofilms should be further investigated, especially in combination with rifampin and/or daptomycin treatment.     

Telavancin In Vitro Activity against a Collection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates,Including Resistant Subsets,from the United States

Telavancin had MIC₅₀, MIC₉₀, and MIC₁₀₀ values of 0.03, 0.06, and 0.12 μg/ml, respectively, against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and non-multidrug-resistant (non-MDR) and MDR subsets. MRSA with elevated MIC values for vancomycin (2 to 4 μg/ml) or daptomycin (1 to 2 μg/ml) had telavancin MIC₅₀ (0.06 μg/ml) values 2-fold higher than those of isolates with lower MIC results (MIC₅₀, 0.03 μg/ml). However, telavancin had MIC₉₀ and MIC₁₀₀ results of 0.06 and 0.12 μg/ml (100% susceptible), respectively, regardless of the MRSA subset.     

Telavancin Demonstrates Activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin,Daptomycin, and Linezolid in Broth Microdilution MIC and One-Compartment Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Models

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates have arisen with reduced susceptibility to several anti-MRSA agents. Telavancin (TLV), a novel anti-MRSA agent, retains low MICs against these organisms. Our objective was to determine the MICs for TLV, daptomycin (DAP), vancomycin (VAN), and linezolid (LZD) against daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) S. aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), heteroresistant VISA (hVISA), and linezolid-resistant (LZD^r) S. aureus. We also evaluated these agents against each phenotype in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models. Seventy DNS, 100 VISA, 180 hVISA, and 25 LZD^r MRSA isolates were randomly selected from our library and tested to determine their MICs against TLV, DAP, VAN, and LZD via broth microdilution and a Trek panel. Four isolates were randomly selected for 168-h in vitro models to evaluate treatment with TLV at 10 mg/kg of body weight/day, DAP at 10 mg/kg/day, VAN at 1 g every 12 h (q12h), and LZD at 600 mg q12h. The MIC_50/90 for TLV, DAP, VAN, and LZD against 70 DNS S. aureus isolates were 0.06/0.125 μg/ml, 2/4 μg/ml, 1/2 μg/ml, and 2/2 μg/ml, respectively. Against 100 VISA isolates, the MIC_50/90 were 0.06/0.125 μg/ml, 1/1 μg/ml, 4/8 μg/ml, and 1/2 μg/ml, respectively. Against 170 hVISA isolates, the MIC_50/90 were 0.06/0.125 μg/ml, 0.5/1 μg/ml, 1/2 μg/ml, and 1/2 μg/ml, respectively. Against 25 LZD^r isolates, the MIC_50/90 were 0.03/0.06 μg/ml, 1/1 μg/ml, 2/2 μg/ml, and 8/8 μg/ml, respectively. The TLV MIC was >0.125 μg/ml for 10/365 (2.7%) isolates. In PK/PD models, TLV was universally bactericidal at 168 h and statistically superior to all antibiotics against DNS S. aureus strain R2334. These data further establish the potency of TLV against resistant MRSA. The model data demonstrate in vitro bactericidal activity of TLV against hVISA, VISA, DNS S. aureus, and LZD^r S. aureus strains. Further clinical research is warranted.     

Comparative In Vitro Activities and Postantibiotic Effects of the Oxazolidinone Compounds Eperezolid (PNU-100592) and Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus Vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium

The activities of the oxazolidinone antibacterial agents eperezolid (PNU-100592) and linezolid (PNU-100766) were compared with that of vancomycin against clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 200), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 100), and vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium (n = 50). Eperezolid and linezolid demonstrated good in vitro inhibitory activity, regardless of methicillin susceptibility for staphylococci (MIC at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited [MIC₉₀] range, 1 to 4 μg/ml) or vancomycin susceptibility for enterococci (MIC₉₀ range, 1 to 4 μg/ml). In time-kill studies, eperezolid and linezolid were bacteriostatic in action. A postantibiotic effect of 0.8 ± 0.5 h was demonstrated for both eperezolid and linezolid against S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. faecalis, and E. faecium.     

Oritavancin Activity against Staphylococcus aureus Causing Invasive Infections in U.S. and European Hospitals: a 5-Year International Surveillance Program

In this study, oritavancin had modal MIC, MIC₅₀, and MIC₉₀ values of 0.03, 0.03, and 0.06 μg/ml, respectively, against Staphylococcus aureus. Similar results (MIC_50/90, 0.03/0.06 μg/ml) were observed against methicillin-resistant and -susceptible isolates and those demonstrating multidrug-resistant (MDR) and non-MDR phenotypes. When oritavancin (MIC_50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/ml) was tested against S. aureus with elevated MIC values for daptomycin (i.e., 1 to 4 mg/ml) and vancomycin (i.e., 2 mg/ml), it showed MIC results 2-fold higher than those for the more susceptible vancomycin or daptomycin counterparts (MIC_50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/ml), yet it inhibited these isolates at ≤0.25 mg/ml.     

Pharmacokinetics and Absolute Bioavailability of Oral Foscarnet in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Seropositive Patients

The pharmacokinetics, absolute bioavailability, accumulation, and tolerability over 8 days of an oral formulation of foscarnet (90 mg/kg of body weight once daily [QD] [n = 6], 90 mg/kg twice daily [BID] [n = 6], and 180 mg/kg QD [n = 3]) were investigated in 15 asymptomatic, human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive male patients free of active cytomegalovirus infection and with normal upper gastrointestinal function. Peak plasma drug concentrations were (mean ± standard deviation) 46.4 ± 10.8 μM (90 mg/kg QD), 45.7 ± 6.9 μM (90 mg/kg BID), and 64.9 ± 31.7 μM (180 mg/kg QD) on day 1 and rose to 86.2 ± 35.8, 78.7 ± 35.2, and 86.4 ± 25.0 μM, respectively, on day 8. The mean peak concentration in plasma following the intravenous administration of foscarnet (90 mg/kg) was 887.3 ± 102.7 μM (n = 13). The terminal half-life in plasma remained unchanged, averaging 5.5 ± 2.2 h on day 1 (n = 15) and 6.6 ± 1.9 h on day 8 (n = 13), whereas it was 5.7 ± 0.7 h following intravenous dosing. Oral bioavailabilities were 9.1% ± 2.2% (90 mg/kg QD), 9.5% ± 1.7% (90 mg/kg BID), and 7.6% ± 3.7% (180 mg/kg QD); the accumulation ratios on the 8th day of dosing were 2.1 ± 1.1, 1.8 ± 0.4, and 1.7 ± 0.7, respectively. The overall 24-h urinary excretion of oral foscarnet averaged 7.8% ± 2.6% (day 1) and 13.4% ± 6.0% (day 8), whereas it was 95.0% ± 4.9% after intravenous dosing. The glomerular filtration rate and creatinine clearance remained constant, and the mean 24-h renal clearances of foscarnet for the entire study group were 96 ± 18 ml/min (day 1), 88 ± 13 ml/min (day 8), and 103 ± 16 ml/min after intravenous dosing. Adverse effects were largely confined to gastrointestinal disturbances, with all subjects experiencing diarrhea that was dose dependent in its severity. The results suggest that the formulation studied would require significant improvement with respect to tolerability and bioavailability to gain clinical acceptance.     

Pharmacokinetics of Antituberculosis Drugs in HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Adults in Malawi

Limited data address the impact of HIV coinfection on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antituberculosis drugs in sub-Saharan Africa. A total of 47 Malawian adults underwent rich pharmacokinetic sampling at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose. Of the subjects, 51% were male, their mean age was 34 years, and 65% were HIV-positive with a mean CD4 count of 268 cells/μl. Antituberculosis drugs were administered as fixed-dose combinations (150 mg rifampin, 75 mg isoniazid, 400 mg pyrazinamide, and 275 mg ethambutol) according to recommended weight bands. Plasma drug concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (rifampin and pyrazinamide) or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (isoniazid and ethambutol). Data were analyzed by noncompartmental methods and analysis of variance of log-transformed summary parameters. The pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows (median [interquartile range]): for rifampin, maximum concentration of drug in plasma (C_max) of 4.129 μg/ml (2.474 to 5.596 μg/ml), area under the curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC_0–∞) of 21.32 μg/ml · h (13.57 to 28.60 μg/ml · h), and half-life of 2.45 h (1.86 to 3.08 h); for isoniazid, C_max of 3.97 μg/ml (2.979 to 4.544 μg/ml), AUC_0–24 of 22.5 (14.75 to 34.59 μg/ml · h), and half-life of 3.93 h (3.18 to 4.73 h); for pyrazinamide, C_max of 34.21 μg/ml (30.00 to 41.60 μg/ml), AUC_0–24 of 386.6 μg/ml · h (320.0 to 463.7 μg/ml · h), and half-life of 6.821 h (5.71 to 8.042 h); and for ethambutol, C_max of 2.278 μg/ml (1.694 to 3.098 μg/ml), AUC_0–24 of 20.41 μg/ml · h (16.18 to 26.27 μg/ml · h), and half-life of 7.507 (6.517 to 8.696 h). The isoniazid PK data analysis suggested that around two-thirds of the participants were slow acetylators. Dose, weight, and weight-adjusted dose were not significant predictors of PK exposure, probably due to weight-banded dosing. In this first pharmacokinetic study of antituberculosis drugs in Malawian adults, measures of pharmacokinetic exposure were comparable with those of other studies for all first-line drugs except for rifampin, for which the C_max and AUC_0–24 values were notably lower. Contrary to some earlier observations, HIV status did not significantly affect the AUC of any of the drugs. Increasing the dose of rifampin might be beneficial in African adults, irrespective of HIV status. Current co-trimoxazole prophylaxis was associated with an increase in the half-life of isoniazid of 41% (P = 0.022). Possible competitive interactions between isoniazid and sulfamethoxazole mediated by the N-acetyltransferase pathway should therefore be explored further.     

In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Lantibiotic NAI-107 in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model

NAI-107 is a novel lantibiotic compound with potent in vitro activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The purpose of this study was to examine the activity of NAI-107 against S. aureus strains, including MRSA, in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Serum pharmacokinetics were determined and time-kill studies were performed following administration of single subcutaneous doses of 5, 20, and 80 mg/kg body weight. The dose fractionation included total doses ranging from 1.56 to 400 mg/kg/72 h, divided into 1, 2, 3, or 6 doses. Studies of treatment effects against 9 S. aureus strains (4 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA] and 5 MRSA) using a 12-h dosing interval and total dose range of 1.56 to 400 mg/kg/72 h were also performed. A maximum effect (E_max) model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index that best described the dose-response data and to estimate the doses required to achieve a net bacteriostatic dose (SD) and a 1-log reduction in CFU/thigh. The pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) range of 26.8 to 276 mg · h/liter and half-lives of 4.2 to 8.2 h. MICs ranged from 0.125 to 0.5 μg/ml. The 2 highest single doses produced more than a 2-log kill and prolonged postantibiotic effects (PAEs) ranging from 36 to >72 h. The dose fractionation-response curves were similar, and the AUC/MIC ratio was the most predictive PD index (AUC/MIC, coefficient of determination [R²] = 0.89; maximum concentration of drug in serum [C_max]/MIC, R² = 0.79; time [T] > MIC, R² = 0.63). A ≥2-log kill was observed against all 9 S. aureus strains. The total drug 24-h AUC/MIC values associated with stasis and a 1-log kill for the 9 S. aureus strains were 371 ± 130 and 510 ± 227, respectively. NAI-107 demonstrated concentration-dependent killing and prolonged PAEs. The AUC/MIC ratio was the predictive PD index. Extensive killing was observed for S. aureus organisms, independent of the MRSA status. The AUC/MIC target should be useful for the design of clinical dosing regimens.     

Pharmacological Properties of NAI-603, a Well-Tolerated Semisynthetic Derivative of Ramoplanin

NAI-603 is a ramoplanin derivative designed to overcome the tolerability issues of the parent drug as a systemic agent. NAI-603 is highly active against aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria, with MICs ranging from 0.008 to 8 μg/ml. MICs were not significantly affected by pH (range, 6 to 8), by inoculum up to 10⁸ CFU/ml, or by addition of 50% human serum. Against staphylococci and enterococci, NAI-603 was rapidly bactericidal, with minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)/MIC ratios never exceeding 4. The frequency of spontaneous resistance was low at 2× to 4× MIC (≤1 × 10⁻⁶ to ≤1 × 10⁻⁸) and below the detection limit (about ≤1 × 10⁻⁹) at 8× MIC. Serial subcultures at 0.5× MIC yielded at most an 8-fold increase in MICs. In a systemic infection induced by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the 50% effective dose (ED₅₀) of intravenous (i.v.) NAI-603 was 0.4 mg/kg, lower than that of oral (p.o.) linezolid (1.4 mg/kg) and subcutaneous (s.c.) teicoplanin (1.4 mg/kg) or vancomycin (0.6 mg/kg). In neutropenic mice infected with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), the ED₅₀s for NAI-603 were 1.1 to 1.6 mg/kg i.v., compared to 0.5 mg/kg i.v. of ramoplanin. The bactericidal activity was confirmed in vivo in the rat granuloma pouch model induced by MRSA, where NAI-603, at 40 mg/kg i.v., induced about a 2- to 3-log₁₀-reduction in viable bacteria in the exudates, which persisted for more than 72 h. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of NAI-603 and ramoplanin at 20 mg/kg show similar half-lives (3.27 and 3.80 h, respectively) with the maximum concentration (C_max) markedly higher for NAI-603 (207 μg/ml versus 79 μg/ml). The favorable pharmacological profile of NAI-603, coupled with the absence of local tolerability issues, supports further investigation.     

Nine-Hospital Study Comparing Broth Microdilution and Etest Method Results for Vancomycin and Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Vancomycin and daptomycin MIC results for 1,800 randomly selected oxacillin (methicillin [meticillin])-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream isolates from nine U.S. hospitals (collected from 2002 to 2006) were determined by a reference broth microdilution (BMD) method using frozen-form panels with precise incremental dilutions and by the Etest technique. The Etest provided vancomycin and daptomycin MIC results that were consistently higher (0.5 to 1.5 log₂ dilution steps) than those provided by the reference BMD method. The dominant MRSA population (91.2% of MRSA isolates) would be categorized as vancomycin nonsusceptible by the MIC results from the Etest method if the susceptibility breakpoint was adjusted downward to ≤1 μg/ml, as suggested by clinical outcome studies.Vancomycin is still used extensively for the treatment of oxacillin (methicillin [meticillin])-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, as well as other less serious MRSA infections. However, vancomycin treatment failure is not uncommon, even when the MRSA strains are fully susceptible to vancomycin according to the criterion (breakpoint MIC, ≤2 μg/ml) used by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). A reduction in the efficacy of vancomycin against MRSA strains for which vancomycin MICs are elevated (to 1 to 2 μg/ml) has been widely reported, suggesting that modest elevations in MICs may explain some suboptimal clinical outcomes (10, 13).The vast majority of clinical laboratories use automated systems and a distinct minority use the disk diffusion method as the routine susceptibility testing technique. However, the disk diffusion method and some automated systems do not accurately detect vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (7). In addition, there have been a growing number of reports showing discrepancies between in vitro susceptibility test results for vancomycin and clinical outcomes of MRSA infections treated with this glycopeptide (6, 11). Thus, many laboratories are being requested to assess exact MICs by reference or alternative methods, such as that of Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden).Although daptomycin remains very active against S. aureus, an association between reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and reduced susceptibility to daptomycin has been reported by some investigators (1). S. aureus isolates classified as daptomycin nonsusceptible according to MICs (≥2 μg/ml) are still rare, and no definitive resistance mechanism has been identified. However, genetic mutations and increases in daptomycin MICs after prolonged vancomycin and/or daptomycin treatment of infections associated with septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, septic thrombophlebitis, and endocarditis, especially in the presence of intravenous catheters and other prosthetic devices, have been reported previously (1). Thus, microbiology laboratories may be required to perform proper daptomycin susceptibility testing. Since a daptomycin disk diffusion test has not been developed, daptomycin susceptibility has to be evaluated by reference methods (2, 3) or the Etest method. In the present study, we evaluated the correlation between vancomycin and daptomycin MICs obtained by the Etest technique and the CLSI reference broth microdilution (BMD) method.(This study was presented in part at the 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy-46th Infectious Diseases Society of America meeting, Washington, DC, 25 to 28 October 2008.)A total of 1,800 MRSA strains from nine hospitals, one in each of the U.S. census regions, were tested. Each medical center contributed 200 MRSA strains collected from patients with bloodstream infections from 2002 through 2006 (target, 40 strains per year per center). The participant centers were as follows: Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA; New York Hospital Queens, New York, NY; Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA; University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; and the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.MICs of daptomycin and vancomycin were determined by the reference BMD method (using frozen-form panels), with the appropriate medium variation (the addition of 50 mg/liter of calcium) for testing daptomycin (2). Thirty-six precise incremental dilutions of vancomycin between 64 and 0.06 μg/ml (64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 3, 2.5, 2, 1.875, 1.75, 1.625, 1.5, 1.375, 1.25, 1.125, 1, 0.938, 0.875, 0.813, 0.75, 0.688, 0.625, 0.563, 0.5, 0.469, 0.438, 0.406, 0.375, 0.344, 0.313, 0.281, 0.25, 0.188, 0.12, 0.094, and 0.06 μg/ml) were tested, and 20 dilutions of daptomycin between 16 and 0.06 μg/ml (16, 8, 4, 2, 1.5, 1, 0.875, 0.75, 0.625, 0.5, 0.438, 0.375, 0.313, 0.25, 0.219, 0.188, 0.156, 0.12, 0.094, and 0.06 μg/ml) were tested. Isolates were also evaluated by Etest for susceptibilities to daptomycin and vancomycin according to the recommendations of the Etest manufacturer (AB Biodisk). To compare the results obtained with the BMD method and those obtained with the Etest technique, BMD results were rounded up to the next dilution provided for the Etest method. Resistance to oxacillin was confirmed by the reference BMD method (dilution range tested, 0.5 to 4 μg/ml) and cefoxitin susceptibilities tested by disk diffusion (2, 3). Quality control strains S. aureus ATCC 25923 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 were evaluated concurrently with every set of tests.MICs of vancomycin obtained by the Etest method were consistently higher (+0.5 to 1.5 log₂ dilutions) than those obtained by the BMD method (Fig. ​(Fig.1a).1a). For strains from all centers combined, the overall vancomycin MIC mode determined by the BMD method was 0.75 μg/ml (corresponding to 75.3% of values, including those rounded up from measured 0.563-, 0.625-, and 0.688-μg/ml MICs) and 96.9% of strains exhibited vancomycin MIC results of ≤1 μg/ml. In contrast, when tested by the Etest, MICs for 58.3 and 32.1% of MRSA strains were 1.5 and 2 μg/ml, respectively (Fig. ​(Fig.1a1a).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Scattergrams showing the correlations between vancomycin (a) and daptomycin (b) MICs obtained by the BMD method and the Etest. Solid lines indicate CLSI susceptibility breakpoints, and broken lines indicate complete agreement between results from the two methods.For all strains except one, the Etest yielded higher vancomycin MICs than the reference method. Among 1,628 strains for which the Etest MIC was 1.5 μg/ml (1,050 strains) or 2 μg/ml (578 strains), only 44 (2.7%) had BMD MIC results of >1 μg/ml. Furthermore, among 13 strains considered to be nonsusceptible (intermediate) to vancomycin (MIC, 3 or 4 μg/ml) according to the Etest results, only 1 had a vancomycin MIC result of >2 μg/ml by the reference method, demonstrating a positive predictive value of only 7.7%.Etest MICs of daptomycin were also slightly elevated (+0.5 to 1 log₂ dilution) compared to BMD MICs (Fig. ​(Fig.1b).1b). When tested by the BMD method, the daptomycin MIC mode was 0.19 μg/ml (corresponding to 55.4% of values, including MICs of 0.156 and 0.188 μg/ml) and 92.9% of strains exhibited daptomycin MIC results of ≤0.25 μg/ml. In contrast, when tested by the Etest, the MIC mode was 0.38 μg/ml (corresponding to 37.2% of values), which is 1 doubling dilution higher than that obtained by the BMD method. Among nine strains considered to be daptomycin nonsusceptible according to the Etest results, only two had a MIC result of >1 μg/ml when tested by the reference BMD method, demonstrating a positive predictive value of 22.2% (Fig. ​(Fig.1b1b).Although the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus strains and that of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus strains are reasons for concern, these organisms still are extremely rare (12). Nevertheless, a number of studies have demonstrated increased clinical failure with MRSA isolates for which vancomycin MICs are increased (>1 μg/ml) but still within the CLSI-defined susceptibility range (≤2 μg/ml) (3, 11, 13). In addition, there are reports of the increase of vancomycin MICs over time (designated “MIC creep”) at individual institutions, although this trend has not been validated by large, multi-institutional studies (14). Thus, it is becoming clear to physicians that an “S” result for vancomycin is not sufficient to appropriately guide therapy and that the clinical laboratory should provide accurate and reliable MICs.Since most clinical laboratories use automated systems to perform susceptibility testing and these systems do not provide a precise vancomycin MIC, many laboratories are using alternative methods for testing vancomycin in selected cases (6). The Etest method is an attractive option for alternative vancomycin testing since it is easy to perform and cost-effective for testing only one drug-bug combination. However, the results of the present study clearly show that the Etest provides vancomycin and daptomycin MIC results consistently higher (by 0.5 to 1.5 log₂ dilutions) than those provided by precisely performed reference BMD tests. Furthermore, the fact that the higher vancomycin MIC results provided by the Etest appear to be more reliable in predicting vancomycin treatment responses (6) indicates that the vancomycin susceptibility breakpoint should be reevaluated.The susceptibility testing method used may have a large impact on physician decisions for vancomycin and daptomycin treatment of MRSA infections. According to the information presented here, the dominant MRSA population (91.2% of strains) would be categorized as vancomycin nonsusceptible by the Etest method if the susceptibility breakpoint was adjusted to ≤1 μg/ml, as suggested by some published clinical outcome studies on recognizing isolates for which vancomycin MICs are 2 μg/ml (4, 5, 8-10, 14). Daptomycin MICs were also affected by the method used, but to a lesser degree (MICs were found to be 0.5 to 1 dilution step higher by the Etest method than by the reference method, with 0.4% false-nonsusceptible results), and may also suffer from the perception of declining daptomycin potency.     

High Activity of Fosfomycin and Rifampin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm In Vitro and in an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Model

Increasing antimicrobial resistance reduces treatment options for implant-associated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We evaluated the activity of fosfomycin alone and in combination with vancomycin, daptomycin, rifampin, and tigecycline against MRSA (ATCC 43300) in a foreign-body (implantable cage) infection model. The MICs of the individual agents were as follows: fosfomycin, 1 μg/ml; daptomycin, 0.125 μg/ml; vancomycin, 1 μg/ml; rifampin, 0.04 μg/ml; and tigecycline, 0.125 μg/ml. Microcalorimetry showed synergistic activity of fosfomycin and rifampin at subinhibitory concentrations against planktonic and biofilm MRSA. In time-kill curves, fosfomycin exhibited time-dependent activity against MRSA with a reduction of 2.5 log₁₀ CFU/ml at 128 × the MIC. In the animal model, planktonic bacteria in cage fluid were reduced by <1 log₁₀ CFU/ml with fosfomycin and tigecycline, 1.7 log₁₀ with daptomycin, 2.2 log₁₀ with fosfomycin-tigecycline and fosfomycin-vancomycin, 3.8 log₁₀ with fosfomycin-daptomycin, and >6.0 log₁₀ with daptomycin-rifampin and fosfomycin-rifampin. Daptomycin-rifampin cured 67% of cage-associated infections and fosfomycin-rifampin cured 83%, whereas all single drugs (fosfomycin, daptomycin, and tigecycline) and rifampin-free fosfomycin combinations showed no cure of MRSA cage-associated infections. No emergence of fosfomycin resistance was observed in animals; however, a 4-fold increase in fosfomycin MIC (from 2 to 16 μg/ml) occurred in the fosfomycin-vancomycin group. In summary, the highest eradication of MRSA cage-associated infections was achieved with fosfomycin in combination with rifampin (83%). Fosfomycin may be used in combination with rifampin against MRSA implant-associated infections, but it cannot replace rifampin as an antibiofilm agent.     

Characterization of High-Level Daptomycin Resistance in Viridans Group Streptococci Developed upon In Vitro Exposure to Daptomycin

Viridans group streptococci (VGS) are part of the normal flora that may cause bacteremia, often leading to endocarditis. We evaluated daptomycin against four clinical strains of VGS (MICs = 1 or 2 μg/ml) using an in vitro-simulated endocardial vegetation model, a simulated bacteremia model, and kill curves. Daptomycin exposure was simulated at 6 mg/kg of body weight and 8 mg/kg every 24 h for endocardial and bacteremia models. Total drug concentrations were used for analyses containing protein (albumin and pooled human serum), and free (unbound) drug concentrations (93% protein bound) were used for analyses not containing protein. Daptomycin MICs in the presence of protein were significantly higher than those in the absence of protein. Despite MICs below or at the susceptible breakpoint, all daptomycin regimens demonstrated limited kill in both pharmacodynamic models. A reduction of approximately 1 to 2 log₁₀ CFU was seen for all isolates and dosages except daptomycin at 6 mg/kg, which achieved a reduction of 2.7 log₁₀ CFU/g against one strain (Streptococcus gordonii 1649) in the endocardial model. Activity was similar in both pharmacodynamic models in the presence or absence of protein. Similar activity was noted in the kill curves over all multiples of the MIC. Regrowth by 24 h was seen even at 8× MIC. Postexposure daptomycin MICs for both pharmacodynamic models increased to >256 μg/ml for all isolates by 24 and 72 h. Despite susceptibility to daptomycin by standard MIC methods, these VGS developed high-level daptomycin resistance (HLDR) after a short duration following drug exposure not attributed to modification or inactivation of daptomycin. Further evaluation is warranted to determine the mechanism of resistance and clinical implications.     

Double-Blind Evaluation of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Oral Once-Daily 750-Milligram and 1-Gram Doses of Levofloxacin in Healthy Volunteers

The safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral levofloxacin in 16 healthy male volunteers were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects were randomly assigned to the treatment (n = 10) or placebo group (n = 6). In study period 1, 750 mg of levofloxacin or a placebo was administered orally as a single dose on day 1, followed by a washout period on days 2 and 3; dosing resumed for days 4 to 10. Following a 3-day washout period, 1 g of levofloxacin or a placebo was administered in a similar fashion in period 2. Plasma and urine levofloxacin concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by model-independent methods. Levofloxacin was rapidly absorbed after single and multiple once-daily 750-mg and 1-g doses with an apparently large volume of distribution. Peak plasma levofloxacin concentration (C_max) values were generally attained within 2 h postdose. The mean values of C_max and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC_0–24) following a single 750-mg dose were 7.1 μg/ml and 71.3 μg · h/ml, respectively, compared to 8.6 μg/ml and 90.7 μg · h/ml, respectively, at steady state. Following the single 1-g dose, mean C_max and AUC_0–24 values were 8.9 μg/ml and 95.4 μg · h/ml, respectively; corresponding values at steady state were 11.8 μg/ml and 118 μg · h/ml. These C_max and AUC_0–24 values indicate modest and similar degrees of accumulation upon multiple dosing at the two dose levels. Values of apparent total body clearance (CL/F), apparent volume of distribution (V_ss/F), half-life (t_1/2), and renal clearance (CL_R) were similar for the two dose levels and did not vary from single to multiple dosing. Mean steady-state values for CL/F, V_ss/F, t_1/2, and CL_R following 750 mg of levofloxacin were 143 ml/min, 100 liters, 8.8 h, and 116 ml/min, respectively; corresponding values for the 1-g dose were 146 ml/min, 105 liters, 8.9 h, and 105 ml/min. In general, the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in healthy subjects following 750-mg and 1-g single and multiple once-daily oral doses appear to be consistent with those found in previous studies of healthy volunteers given 500-mg doses. Levofloxacin was well tolerated at either high dose level. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were nausea and headache.     

Dosing of Aminoglycosides To Rapidly Attain Pharmacodynamic Goals and Hasten Therapeutic Response by Using Individualized Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Patients with Pneumonia Caused by Gram-Negative Organisms

Achieving a peak aminoglycoside concentration (C_max)/MIC of ≥10 within 48 h of initiation of therapy for pneumonia caused by gram-negative organisms results in a 90% probability of therapeutic response by day 7. Targeting an MIC of 1 μg/ml, empirical aminoglycoside loading doses of 348 (25th- to 75th-percentile range, 275 to 432) mg were calculated to obtain a C_max/MIC of 10 in our patient population. Individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring coupled with MIC data should determine subsequent dosing regimens to minimize the potential for toxicity and maximize the probability of clinical response.     

Evaluation of the Novel Combination of High-Dose Daptomycin plus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole against Daptomycin-Nonsusceptible Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Using an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model of Simulated Endocardial Vegetations

Daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) Staphylococcus aureus is found in difficult-to-treat infections, and the optimal therapy is unknown. We investigated the activity of high-dose (HD) daptomycin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole de-escalated to HD daptomycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole against 4 clinical DNS methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of simulated endocardial vegetations (10⁹ CFU/g). Simulated regimens included HD daptomycin at 10 mg/kg/day for 14 days, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole at 160/800 mg every 12 h for 14 days, HD daptomycin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for 14 days, and the combination for 7 days de-escalated to HD daptomycin for 7 days and de-escalated to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for 7 days. Differences in CFU/g (at 168 and 336 h) were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Tukey''s post hoc test. Daptomycin MICs were 4 μg/ml (SA H9749-1, vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus; R6212, heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus) and 2 μg/ml (R5599 and R5563). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole MICs were ≤0.06/1.19 μg/ml. HD daptomycin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole displayed rapid bactericidal activity against SA H9749-1 (at 7 h) and R6212 (at 6 h) and bactericidal activity against R5599 (at 72 h) and R5563 (at 36 h). A ≥8 log₁₀ CFU/g decrease was observed with HD daptomycin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole against all strains (at 48 to 144 h), which was maintained with de-escalation to HD daptomycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole at 336 h. The combination for 14 days and the combination for 7 days de-escalated to HD daptomycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was significantly better than daptomycin monotherapy (P < 0.05) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole monotherapy (P < 0.05) at 168 and 336 h. Combination therapy followed by de-escalation offers a novel bactericidal therapeutic alternative for high-inoculum, serious DNS MRSA infections.     

In Vitro Activity of Dalbavancin against Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from a Global Surveillance Program

In over a decade (2002 to 2012) of Staphylococcus aureus surveillance testing on 62,195 isolates, dalbavancin was demonstrated to be active against isolates that were either susceptible or nonsusceptible to daptomycin, linezolid, or tigecycline. Nearly all (99.8%) multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were inhibited by dalbavancin at ≤0.12 μg/ml (MIC_50/90, 0.06/0.06 μg/ml), the current U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) breakpoint. Overall, only 0.35% of the monitored S. aureus isolates had a dalbavancin MIC of either 0.25 or 0.5 μg/ml (i.e., were nonsusceptible).     

In Vitro Resistance Studies with Bacteria That Exhibit Low Mutation Frequencies: Prediction of “Antimutant” Linezolid Concentrations Using a Mixed Inoculum Containing both Susceptible and Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Bacterial resistance studies using in vitro dynamic models are highly dependent on the starting inoculum that might or might not contain spontaneously resistant mutants (RMs). To delineate concentration-resistance relationships with linezolid-exposed Staphylococcus aureus, a mixed inoculum containing both susceptible cells and RMs was used. An RM selected after the 9th passage of the parent strain (MIC, 2 μg/ml) on antibiotic-containing media (RM9; MIC, 8 μg/ml) was chosen for the pharmacodynamic studies, because the mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of linezolid against the parent strain in the presence of RM9 at 10² (but not at 10⁴) CFU/ml did not differ from the MPC value determined in the absence of the RMs. Five-day treatments with twice-daily linezolid doses were simulated at concentrations either between the MIC and MPC or above the MPC. S. aureus RMs (resistant to 2× and 4× MIC but not 8× and 16× MIC) were enriched at ratios of the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC₂₄) to the MIC that provide linezolid concentrations between the MIC and MPC for 100% (AUC₂₄/MIC, 60 h) and 86% (AUC₂₄/MIC, 120 h) of the dosing interval. No such enrichment occurred when linezolid concentrations were above the MIC and below the MPC for a shorter time (37% of the dosing interval; AUC₂₄/MIC, 240 h) or when concentrations were consistently above the MPC (AUC₂₄/MIC, 480 h). These findings obtained using linezolid-susceptible staphylococci supplemented with RMs support the mutant selection window hypothesis. This method provides an option to delineate antibiotic concentration-resistance relationships with bacteria that exhibit low mutation frequencies.