Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasonography to predict successful labor induction, and to estimate the most useful cut-off points for the two methods. METHODS: The five components of the Bishop score were assessed by digital examination and cervical length was measured by transvaginal ultrasonography in 177 women with a single pregnancy, 36-42 weeks of gestation, and a live fetus in cephalic presentation before induction of labor. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis showed that the Bishop score, cervical length, and parity provided independent contribution in the prediction of the likelihood of delivering vaginally within 60 h. The only component of the Bishop score that was independently predictive of the probability of vaginal delivery within 60 h was station. The best cut-off points for predicting successful induction using receiver operating characteristic curves were 24 mm for cervical length and 4 for the Bishop score. Cervical length was a better predictor than the Bishop score (sensitivity and specificity of 66 and 77% versus 77 and 56%, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that cervical length was the best discriminator of successful induction. CONCLUSION: Measurement of cervical length by transvaginal ultrasonography is a better predictor of success in labor induction with both topical prostaglandin and oxytocin.     

Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction

Purpose  To evaluate the role of ultrasonographic and various maternal and fetal parameters in predicting successful labor induction. Methods  Body mass index, cervical length, dilatation, effacement, Bishop score, parity, maternal age and birth weight were evaluated in 189 singleton pregnant women at 37–42 weeks of gestation and having induction of labor. All underwent induction of labor with oxytocin. Body mass index was calculated using the formula weight (kg)/height² (m), cervical measurement was performed by transvaginal ultrasonography and Bishop score was determined by digital examination of cervix. Results  Logistic regression analysis indicated that the cervical length and body mass index were independent variables in determining the risk of cesarean section (OR = 1.206, P = 0.000, CI 95% = 1.117–1.303; OR = 1.223, P = 0.007, CI 95% = 1.058–1.414 respectively). In multiple linear regression analysis, the effect of cervical length and body mass index on induction delivery interval was found to be statistically significant (t = 5.738, P = 0.000; t = 2.680, P = 0.009, respectively). ROC curve showed that the best parameter in predicting the risk of cesarean section was cervical length and that cervical length and body mass index were better parameters compared to the Bishop score (the areas under the curve are 0.819, 0.701 and 0.416, respectively). Conclusions  Body mass index and transvaginal cervical length were better predictors compared to the Bishop score in determining the success of labor induction.     

Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine if transvaginal sonographic measurement of the cervical length is a useful method to predict successful labor induction in nulliparas. METHODS: 137 women who were scheduled for medically indicated induction of labor had a transvaginal sonographic measurement of the cervical length before labor induction. Inclusion criteria were: (1) singleton pregnancy; (2) gestational age between 37-42 weeks; (3) live fetus in cephalic presentation; (4) intact membranes; (5) no vaginal bleeding; (6) no previous history of uterine surgery; (7) nulliparous women, and (8) no allergy or asthma in response to prostaglandins. Induction of labor was performed within 6 h of the ultrasonographic examination, by inserting 2 mg of dinoprostone in the posterior vaginal fornix, repeated if needed every 6 h for up to three doses. When the cervix became favorable and no regular contractions were observed, amniotomy and oxytocin augmentation, starting at 1 mIU/min and increasing 1 mIU every 30 min as necessary, was performed. RESULTS: All women were Caucasians and the mean age was 24.3 years (range 19-37 years). The mean cervical length was 28 mm (range 11-39 mm). The Bishop score was < or =5 in 101 women and >5 in the 36 others. Vaginal delivery occurred in 92 women (67.1%), and the vast majority of them (89 women; 96.7%) gave birth within 24 h of induction. Forty-five women (32.8%) had a cesarean section. The Bishop score was not predictive of the mode of delivery. Thirty-six of 101 women (35.6%) with a Bishop score < or =5 delivered by cesarean section, compared to 9 of 36 women with a Bishop score >5 (25%) (p = NS). Women with a cervical length <27 mm were more likely to deliver vaginally. Using this cutoff value the sensitivity of a successful labor induction was 76% and the specificity was 75.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length is a good predictor of a successful labor induction at term in nulliparas.     

Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor

Purpose

This study was undertaken to evaluate the comparative value of sonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting the type of delivery after induced labor.

Methods

The Bishop score was determined by digital examination and cervical length by transvaginal sonography in 177 women.

Results

The best cut-off points for predicting type of delivery found with ROC curves were 25.2?mm for cervical length and 5 for the Bishop score. The Bishop score was not predictive of type of delivery. Cervical length was related to type of delivery in women with Bishop score ≤5. A logistic regression model showed that only cervical length ≥25.2?mm, parity, and body mass index significantly predicted the likelihood of cesarean delivery.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that both Bishop score and sonographic cervical length can contribute to predicting type of delivery after labor induction, but cervical length is a better predictor of the risk of cesarean delivery.     

Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare transvaginal cervical measurement and the Bishop score as indicators of duration of labor and successful induction of labor at term.Study Design: This prospective observational study recruited women with singleton gestations scheduled for induction of labor at > or =37 weeks. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length was performed and the Bishop score was determined, each by operators masked to the other measurement. Data were collected on parity, gestational age, mode of delivery, induction agent, induction-to-delivery interval, Bishop score, and cervical length measurement. RESULTS: A total of 77 women were analyzed. Vaginal delivery occurred in 69%. Both Bishop score and cervical length showed linear correlation with duration of labor (R(2) = 0.43, P <. 001; R(2) = 0.48, P <.001; respectively). Women with cervical length <3.0 cm had shorter labors (P <.001) and were more likely to be delivered vaginally (P <.001). Women with a Bishop score >4 also had shorter labors and were more likely to be delivered vaginally, with similar P values. A logistic regression model identified cervical length and parity as the only independent predictors of vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Both ultrasonographically measured cervical length and Bishop score predict duration of labor and likelihood of vaginal delivery. However, only cervical length and parity were independent predictors of mode of delivery.     

Comparison of pre-induction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting risk of cesarean section after labor induction with prostaglandins

OBJECTIVE: To compare pre-induction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting risk of caesarean section after labor induction with prostaglandins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Assessment of the Bishop score and measurement of the cervical length by transvaginal sonography were performed by two operators, blinded to each other's results among women with singleton pregnancies at between 34(+0) - 41(+3) weeks of gestation requiring induction of labor with prostaglandins for medical indications. Fisher's exact test and regression logistic models were used for statistics analysis. In order to measure the strength of the association between ultrasonographic cervical length or Bishop score on one hand, and the caesarean sections rate (global or for failed induction or failure to progress) on the other hand, we computed odds ratios with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Among the 266 patients included in the study, multivariate analysis has shown that only Bishop score was predictive for the global caesarean section risk (OR [95% CI] 0.63 [0.45-0.87] ; P =0.005). However, neither Bishop score (OR [95% CI] 0.68 [0.42-1.09] ; P =0.11), nor ultrasonographic cervical length (OR [95% CI] 1.01 [0.95-1.08] ; P =0.59) was predictive for failed induction or failure to progress caesarean section risk. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The Bishop score appears to be a better predictor of the global caesarean section risk than ultrasonographic cervical length after induction of labor for medical reasons.     

Comparison of Cervical Length Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasonography and Bishop Score in Predicting Response to Labor Induction

Background

This study aims to compare the value of the Bishop score and cervical length measurement by transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting active labor within 6 h, induction-to-delivery interval, and the duration of active labor and to estimate the most useful cutoff points for the two methods.

Methods

This is a prospective comparative study of Bishop score and cervical length measured by transvaginal sonography on 62 nulliparous subjects who underwent induction of labor.

Results

The Bishop score of the subjects ranged from two to seven (2–7). The mean Bishop in this study population was 4.37 + 1.23. The mean cervical length in this study was 25.59 + 6.07. Bishop score was highly significant (P value < 0.0001) in predicting active phase of labor as compared to cervical length (P = 0.004). The best cutoff value for Bishop score to predict induction of labor within 6 h was more than 4 with sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 79%. Similarly, best cutoff value for cervical length to predict induction of labor within 6 h was less than or equal to 25 mm with sensitivity of 51% and specificity of 70%. Bishop score was more significant (P = 0.001) in predicting induction-to-delivery interval within 12 h as compared to cervical length (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

The Bishop score was superior in predicting the response to induction as compared to the cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography.

     

Preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop's score and transvaginal ultrasound

In this pilot study, 50 patients underwent preinduction cervical assessment by digital Bishop Score (BS) and transvaginal ultrasonography. The BS was lower in 7 patients requiring caesarean section than in 43 delivered vaginally (P = 0.017). Of seven ultrasound parameters examined, six (cervical length, width, dilatation, application and position and lower segment thickness) were similar in both groups. Cervical angle, however, was more acute in those delivered abdominally than vaginally (median = 60 degrees and 90 degrees, respectively, P = 0.002). Posterior cervical angle was more accurate than BS in predicting vaginal delivery (Kappa = 0.48 versus 0.21). Patient discomfort was significantly less with transvaginal ultrasound than digital examination. Combining posterior cervical angle greater than 70 degrees and BS greater than 5 yielded the best accuracy in predicting successful induction of labour (sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 100%, Kappa = 0.68).     

阴道超声及细胞因子预测宫颈成熟度和临产时间的初步探讨

目的　探讨阴道超声、细胞因子———白细胞介素 (IL) 6、8及人绒毛膜促性腺激素 (hCG)对足月妊娠宫颈成熟度、临产时间的预测价值。方法　检测 79例足月初产妇宫颈阴道分泌液IL 6、IL 8及hCG水平 ;通过阴道超声测量孕妇宫颈长度、宫颈内口楔形区宽度、前羊膜囊长度 ;同时进行宫颈Bishop评分。结果　 (1)IL 6、IL 8、hCG临产后水平 [分别为 (782± 5 0 8)ng/L、(10 5 3 9± 8680 )ng/L、(114± 86)IU/L]较临产前 [分别为 (15 5± 75 )ng/L、(7113± 60 5 0 )ng/L、(3 5± 2 1)IU/L]显著升高 ,差异有极显著性 (P <0 0 5 )。 (2 )IL 6、IL 8、hCG、宫颈长度、前羊膜囊长度均与宫颈Bishop评分显著相关(r=0 42、0 2 4、0 44、- 0 5 6、0 3 5 ,P <0 0 5 )。 (3 )IL 6、IL 8、宫颈长度、前羊膜囊长度、宫颈Bishop评分均与临产时间显著相关 (r=- 0 42、- 0 46、0 64、- 0 5 2、- 0 41,P <0 0 1) ;且均能预测 1周内临产 ,其中宫颈长度的预测效果最好。宫颈长度≤ 3 0mm者 ,预测其在 1周内分娩的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为 0 83、0 89、0 91、0 81。 (4)多因素分析显示 :阴道超声测量宫颈长度 ,预测宫颈成熟度和临产时间的价值优于其他指标。结论　孕妇宫颈阴道分泌液IL 6、     

Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of ultrasonographic cervical assessment with Bishop score before induction of labour in predicting the success of labour induction in nulliparous women. METHODS: This is a prospective study conducted in 138 women who underwent cervical assessment with transvaginal sonography followed by digital cervical assessment using Bishop score before induction of labour. Ultrasonographic parameters evaluated were cervical length, posterior cervical angle and funnelling were blinded to the managing physicians. Statistical analysis was carried out using Mann-Whitney test, chi2 test, receiver operating characteristics curves and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Induction of labour was successful in 106 (76.8%) of the women. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated cervical length and posterior cervical angle assessed by transvaginal sonography as independent predictors of successful outcome after induction of labour. Neither Bishop score nor its individual parameters were found to be significant in the regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for cervical length and posterior cervical angle was greater than that of the Bishop score in predicting a successful labour induction. The best cut-off point for the parameters in receiver operating characteristics curve was 3.0 cm for cervical length and 100 degrees for posterior cervical angle. Cervical length of 3.0 cm had a sensitivity of 84.9%, and a specificity of 90.6% and a posterior cervical angle of 100 degrees with 65% and 72%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and posterior cervical angle is better than conventional Bishop score in predicting successful labour induction in nulliparous women.     

Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction.

OBJECTIVE: To compare transvaginal ultrasound and digital cervical examination in predicting successful induction in post-term pregnancy. METHODS: Transvaginal ultrasound and digital vaginal examinations were performed on 122 women at 41 or more weeks' gestation, immediately before labor induction. Ultrasound assessments of cervical length, dilatation, and presence of funneling were compared with the components of the Bishop score. The primary outcome was the rate of vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes assessed included the rates of active labor in 12 hours, vaginal delivery in 12 and 24 hours, mean duration of latent phase, and induction to vaginal delivery interval. Linear and multiple logistic regression models were generated to identify factors independently associated with successful induction. RESULTS: No ultrasound characteristic predicted primary or secondary outcomes. Bishop score (odds ratio [OR] 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71, 5.20), cervical position (OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.41, 12.50), and maternal age (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01, 1.30) independently predicted vaginal delivery. Maternal weight (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94, 0.98), cervical dilatation (OR 6.08, 95% CI 1.70, 21.68), and effacement (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.16, 4.73) independently predicted active labor in 12 hours. Independent predictors of vaginal delivery in 12 hours were induction method (P <.001), cervical dilatation (OR 11.16, 95% CI 3.17, 39.29), gravidity (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.13, 3.77), and maternal weight (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93, 0.99). Cervical effacement (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.59, 4.57) and parity (OR 7.10, 95% CI 2.22, 22.72) independently predicted vaginal delivery in 24 hours. Maternal weight, cervical position, and cervical dilatation were independently associated with latent phase labor duration. Factors independently associated with length of induction to delivery interval were parity, cervical effacement, and maternal weight. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal ultrasound does not predict successful labor induction in post-term pregnancy as well as digital cervical examination.     

Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score

OBJECTIVE: To compare pre-induction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting time to delivery after labour induction with prostaglandins. DESIGN: Prognostic cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral maternity unit in a teaching hospital. POPULATION: Two hundred and sixty-six women with singleton pregnancies at between 34(+0) and 41(+3) weeks of gestation requiring induction of labour with prostaglandins for medical indications. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a trial comparing two prostaglandins. Assessment of the Bishop score and measurement of the cervical length by transvaginal sonography were performed by two operators, blinded to each other's results. We estimated the predictive effects on the outcomes of ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time intervals from induction to delivery and to vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Cervical length and Bishop score were associated with the time interval from induction to delivery, based on univariable analyses. When considered jointly in a multivariable model, only the Bishop score was significantly related to the outcome: The higher the Bishop score, the higher the hazard to delivery [hazard ratio (HR): 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-1.3], illustrating that once the Bishop score is taken into account, further knowledge of cervical ultrasound length (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-1.0) did not add any predictive information. Also, Bishop score was predictive of time interval between induction and vaginal delivery (HR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.4) while cervical length had no additional predictive value (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-1.0) when both cervical length and Bishop score were introduced in the model. CONCLUSIONS: The Bishop score appears to be a better predictor of the time interval from induction to delivery and to vaginal delivery than cervical length after induction of labour for medical reasons.     

Induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section using the double balloon device.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of labor induction by the double balloon device in women with previous cesarean section. Induction of labor was carried out in 37 women with previous cesarean section for various indications. All the inductions of labor were performed using the Atad double balloon device (ARD). RESULTS: Cervical ripening (Bishop scores above 5) was achieved in 82.3% of the induced women with subsequent vaginal delivery in 78.6% and repeat cesarean section in 22.3%. An important observation of the results was the chances to achieve a vaginal delivery according to the second Bishop score that was recorded 12 hours following the insertion of the device. When the second was above 5 the chances for vaginal delivery were 79.4%. The mean time from removal of the device to delivery was 10.8 hours. No complications were noted using the device. CONCLUSIONS: The double balloon device appears to be a safe and effective method of inducing labor in women with a previous lower segment cesarean section. Wide scale studies and further use of the device for induction of labor in women who have had previous cesarean sections are warranted.     

Prediction of cervical response to prostaglandin E2 using fetal fibronectin

BACKGROUND: To determine whether presence of fetal fibronectin in cervico-vaginal secretions at term will predict the cervical response to prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) pessaries and successful induction of labor amongst subjects with unfavorable cervices. METHODS: Cervico-vaginal secretion was tested for the presence of fetal fibronectin prior to cervical ripening with PGE2 pessaries in women with a singleton term or post-term pregnancy undergoing induction of labor. The total number of PGE2 pessaries, interval from induction to labor and induction to delivery, latent phase and active phase of labor and cesarean section rate were compared. RESULTS: Women with fetal fibronectin in their cervico-vaginal secretion had better cervical response to PGE2 pessaries and required fewer doses for induction of labor and they took a shorter time interval from induction to delivery. They tend to have a lower cesarean section rate but the figures did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of fetal fibronectin from cervico-vaginal secretions in subjects with a Bishop score <5 is predictive of a favorable response to induction by prostaglandin pessary     

Fetal fibronectin: A new tool for the prediction of successful induction of labor

OBJECTIVE: The Bishop score is the only available tool for predicting successful labor induction. Vaginal fetal fibronectin has been shown to predict which patients will enter labor spontaneously, usually within 2 weeks. This study was designed to determine whether fetal fibronectin can also predict the success of labor induction. STUDY DESIGN: Term patients undergoing labor induction had a single swab from the vagina tested for fetal fibronectin before initiation of cervical ripening or oxytocin. The swab was tested with a blinded qualitative immunoassay for fetal fibronectin (positive ≥50 ng/ml). RESULTS: Of the overall 160 subjects, 108 had a positive and 52 had a negative fetal fibronectin result. Patients with a positive result had a lower cesarean section rate (15% vs 27%, p = 0.05) and shorter intervals to delivery, including first dose of prostaglandin to delivery interval (21.3 vs 35.8 hours, p = 0.0001) and first stage of labor (14.8 vs 21.2 hours, p = 0.0009). These differences remain similar even in nulliparous women with Bishop scores ≤5, with patients with positive results having statistically shorter intervals to delivery and similar differences in cesarean section rates (22% vs 35%), although this difference was not significant. In this subgroup more than half the patients in the negative results group (11/20) were undelivered after 24 hours and were judged to require a second dose of prostaglandin compared with only 2 of 53 in the group with positive results (p = 0.000001). By stepwise logistic regression analysis the predictive ability of a positive result for fetal fibronectin was found to be independent of the Bishop score. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal fetal fibronectin appears to be an efficacious new test that independently predicts which patients will have shorter and easier inductions of labor and lower cesarean section rates, even nulliparous patients with low Bishop scores. This test has the potential for clinical utility and cost reduction. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1516-21.)     

Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of cesarean delivery associated with elective induction of labor in nulliparous women at term. METHODS: We performed a cohort study on a major urban obstetric service that serves predominantly private obstetric practices. All term, nulliparous women with vertex, singleton gestations who labored during an 8-month period (n = 1561) were divided into three groups: spontaneous labor, elective induction, and medical induction. The risk of cesarean delivery in the induction groups was determined using stepwise logistic regression to control for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Women experiencing spontaneous labor had a 7.8% cesarean delivery rate, whereas women undergoing elective labor induction had a 17.5% cesarean delivery rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 3.18) and women undergoing medically indicated labor induction had a 17.7% cesarean delivery rate (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.13, 2.54). Other variables that remained significant risk factors for cesarean delivery in the model included: epidural placement at less than 4 cm dilatation (OR 4.66; 95% CI 2.25, 9.66), epidural placement after 4 cm dilatation (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.06, 4.48), chorioamnionitis (OR 4.61; 95% CI 2.89, 7.35), birth weight greater than 4000 g (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.69, 3.97), maternal body mass index greater than 26 kg/m2 (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.61, 3.47), Asian race (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.04, 5.34), and magnesium sulfate use (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.04, 4.55). CONCLUSION: Elective induction of labor is associated with a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women. Avoiding labor induction in settings of unproved benefit may aid efforts to reduce the primary cesarean delivery rate.     

Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the values of preinduction transvaginal cervical length measurements and Bishop score to predict successful labor induction. METHODS: A prospective, observational trial of nulliparous women undergoing labor induction. Inclusion criteria were gestational age between 36 and 42 weeks, singleton cephalic presentation of the fetus, and intact membranes. Preinduction cervical ripening was performed using 25 microg intravaginal misoprostol (PGE1), repeated every 4 h, up to a maximum of 3 doses. Induction was subsequently continued by oxytocin and amniotomy. RESULTS: A total of 43 women met the inclusion criteria. Mean preinduction cervical length for women with successful or failed labor induction was 26 mm (95% Confidence interval [CI], 27-32) and 34 mm (95% CI, 33-38), respectively (P=0.002). Mean Bishop scores for successful and failed induction groups were 5.4 (95% CI, 5.2-6.2) and 3.1 (95% CI, 2.8-3.5), respectively (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Digital examination and transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix predict successful labor induction with reasonable accuracy.     

Intracervical misoprostol as an effective method of labor induction at term.

OBJECTS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of intracervical misoprostol for the induction of labor at term. METHODS: Eighty-nine term pregnancies requiring induction of labor were treated intracervically with 50 microg of misoprostol. The dose was repeated every 4 h until adequate uterine contraction and cervical dilatation were achieved. Status of cervical ripening, uterine contraction, cervical dilatation, labor course and side effects were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 89 patients, 58 had an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < or = 4) and 31 had a favorable cervix (Bishop score > 4). Labor was successfully induced in all cases, most (93.3%) of which required a single dose of misoprostol. Seventy-two patients (81%) proceeded to spontaneous vaginal delivery, and 61 (85%) deliveries were achieved within 12 h. The other 17 cases received cesarean delivery with indications of fetopelvic disproportion (six cases), failure of induction (seven cases) and acute fetal distress (four cases). The mean duration from induction to regular uterine contraction and to delivery was 483+/-537 min and 79.2+/-38.2 min, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups with differing status of cervical ripening. Complications of uterine contraction, including tachysystole (15 cases), hypertonus (one case) and hyperstimulation (10 cases) were more common in the group of unfavorable cervix (45%) than that of favorable cervix (23%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In addition to the oral and intravaginal routes of administration, intracervical misoprostol at a single dose of 50 microg appears to be an effective method for induction of labor at term, but caution should be taken with cases with unfavorable cervix.     

Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of induction on the route of delivery in nulliparous women laboring at term in a community hospital system. STUDY DESIGN: From April 1997 to October 1999, there were 7282 deliveries in nulliparous patients who met inclusion criteria. Cesarean delivery rates were calculated for patients in spontaneous labor and for patients who underwent induction. RESULTS: Among 4635 women (63.7%) in spontaneous labor, the cesarean delivery rate was 11.5% versus 23.7% among the 2647 (36.3%) patients who underwent induction. An important variable that affected the delivery route was the Bishop score at the initiation of the induction. The cesarean delivery rate was 31.5% among patients whose Bishop score was <5 at induction versus 18.1% for patients with a score > or =5(P <.001). CONCLUSION: The induction of labor in nulliparous patients, especially those women with an unfavorable cervix as measured by Bishop score, is associated with a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery.     

Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether maternal age, height and weight, parity, duration of pregnancy, cervical dilatation or Bishop score, and birth weight could be used to predict the likelihood of successful induction in women given intravaginal misoprostol. STUDY DESIGN: A computerized database was compiled of 1373 pregnancies in which intravaginal misoprostol was given for cervical ripening and labor induction. Most of these women were placed on investigational protocols in which the dose of misoprostol administered was 25 to 50 microg and the dosing intervals ranged from 3 to 6 hours. No more than 24 hours of administration was permitted. Induction was undertaken in women with unfavorable cervical examinations (Bishop scores of 4 or less) and without spontaneous labor or ruptured membranes. Univariate and stepwise multiple regression analyses were performed to identify those factors associated with successful induction, defined as vaginal delivery within 24 hours of induction. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-seven (48%) had successful induction. Parity (odds ratio [OR] 2.5, 95% CI 2.0-2.9, P <.0001), initial cervical dilatation (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.3, P <.0001), Bishop score (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3, 1.8, P <.0001), and gestational age at entry (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, P =.002) were significant at the.05 level for predicting successful induction. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression was then performed to evaluate each of these as independent predictors. Parity (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.0-3.0, P <.0001), initial cervical dilatation (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.1, P <.0001), and estimated gestational age (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, P =.003) are significant independent predictors for successful induction, but initial Bishop score is not significant (P =.19) after adjustment for other significant predicting factors. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical characteristics of parity, initial cervical dilatation, and gestational age at entry are predictors of the likelihood of success of cervical ripening and labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol administration.