BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Turkish breast/ovarian families and young breast cancer patients

To date, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast and/or ovarian patients have not been characterized in the Turkish population. We investigated the presence of BRCA mutations in 53 individuals with a personal and family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and 52 individuals with a personal history of breast cancer diagnosed below age 50 without additional family history. We have identified 11 mutations (nine BRCA1 and two BRCA2) using combined techniques involving protein truncation test, direct sequencing and heteroduplex analysis. We found eight out of 53 patients (15.1%) with a family history to carry BRCA gene mutations (seven BRCA1 and one BRCA2). Of these, four were found in 43 families presenting only breast cancer histories, and four were found in families presenting ovarian cancer with or without breast cancer. We also demonstrated two BRCA1 and one BRCA2 mutations in three out of 52 (5.8%) early-onset breast cancer cases without additional family history. Three of nine BRCA1 and both BRCA2 mutations detected in this study were not reported previously. These mutations may be specific to the Turkish population. The BRCA1 5382insC mutation, specific to Ashkenazi and Russian populations, was found twice in our study group, representing a possible founder mutation in the Turkish population.     

Screening of 1331 Danish breast and/or ovarian cancer families identified 40 novel BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

Germ-line mutations in the tumour suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose to breast and ovarian cancer. Since 1999 we have performed mutational screening of breast and/or ovarian cancer patients in East Denmark. During this period we have identified 40 novel sequence variations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in high risk breast and/or ovarian cancer families. The mutations were detected via pre-screening using dHPLC or high-resolution melting and direct sequencing. We identified 16 variants in BRCA1, including 9 deleterious frame-shift mutations, 2 intronic variants, 4 missense mutations, and 1 synonymous variant. The remaining 24 variants were identified in BRCA2, including 10 deleterious mutants (6 frame-shift and 4 nonsense), 2 intronic variants, 10 missense mutations and 2 synonymous variants. The frequency of the variants of unknown significance was examined in control individuals. Moreover, the presumed significance of the missense mutations was predicted in silico using the align GVGD algorithm. In conclusion, the mutation screening identified 40 novel variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and thereby extends the knowledge of the BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation spectrum. Nineteen of the mutations were interpreted as pathogenic, 3 missense mutations were suggested to be pathogenic based on in silico analysis, 6 mutations were suggested to be benign since they were identified in patients together with a well-known disease-causing BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation, while 12 were variants of unknown significance.     

Mutation screening of RAD51C in high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families

Deleterious mutations in the RAD51C gene, which encodes a DNA double-strand break repair protein, have been reported to confer high-penetrance susceptibility to both breast and ovarian cancer. To confirm this we conducted a mutation screen of the RAD51C gene in 192 probands from high-risk breast and/or ovarian cancer families that do not carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. The nine exons of the RAD51C gene containing protein coding sequence were screened for mutations in genomic DNA from family probands by high-resolution melting analysis and direct DNA sequencing. Four missense variants, p.Ser364Gly, p.Ala126Thr, p.Val169Ala, and p.Thr287Ala were detected in six patients. The p.Ser364Gly variant is a novel variant predicted to have little influence on RAD51C activity. The p.Ala126Thr and p.Val169Ala variants have been reported to have no association with risk of breast cancer in a case–control study. However, p.Thr287Ala disrupts the DNA repair activity of RAD51C, suggesting some influence on risk. Consistent with published results from similar follow-up studies, we suggest that RAD51C mutations are rare events among high-risk breast cancer and breast/ovarian cancer families. Large population-based studies will be needed to reliably assess the prevalence and penetrance of inactivating mutations in the RAD51C susceptibility gene.     

A HRM-based screening method detects RAD51C germ-line deleterious mutations in Spanish breast and ovarian cancer families

The RAD51C gene has been recently proposed as a high-penetrance breast and ovarian cancer gene. However, early replication studies have failed to confirm the finding. Thus, further studies in larger cohorts should be conducted in order to clarify the role of RAD51C as a cancer susceptibility gene. Here, we describe a high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA)-based method developed for presequence screening of RAD51C sequence variants. We have screened RAD51C sequence variants by HRMA in 492 breast cancer patients with family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer that were previously tested negative for BRCA1/2. All variants were confirmed by direct sequencing. We have detected 12 different RAD51C germ-line sequence variants, including eight transitions, two transversion, and two indels (insA, and delT). All these variants generated melting profiles which differ from wild type homozygous controls. Interestingly, we have identified one clearly pathogenic mutation (c.774delT) in the subset of 101 breast and ovarian cancer families, supporting that RAD51C is a human breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Danish families with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer

A national study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Danish HBOC (Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer) families revealed a total number of 322 mutation positive families, 206 (64%) BRCA1 and 116 (36%) BRCA2 positive families from a population of 5.5 million inhabitants. Seven hundred and twenty six mutation positive individuals were identified: 402 female BRCA1 carriers, 79 male BRCA1 carriers, 213 female BRCA2 carriers, and 32 male BRCA2 carriers by April 2006. Most of the mutations were frame shift or nonsense mutations, while large genomic rearrangements were rare. Most mutations were only identified in one family. A few mutations were detected repeatedly. In BRCA1 the most common mutations were: 2594delC in 32 families (16%), 3438G>T in 19 families (9%), 5382insC in 16 families (8%), 3829delT in 11 families (5%). In BRCA2 the most common mutations were: 6601delA in 13 families (11%), 1538del4 in 12 families (10%), 6714del4 in 10 families (9%). There was a tendency towards a higher frequency of BRCA2 mutations in West Denmark compared to East Denmark. The frequencies of specific BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were slightly different in the two regions. The mutations occurring in West Denmark have also been observed in other Scandinavian countries whereas the mutations occurring in East Denmark were more often reported from other European countries and the Baltic countries. The pattern of mutation distributions are comparable with observations from other Scandinavian and European studies and indicate that the Danish BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are a mixture of Scandinavian mutations and other European mutations including two of the Ashkenazi mutations. Even though a tendency towards founder mutations was observed most mutations were only detected once. Based on these observations we recommend that the mutation screening strategy of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Danish HBOC families comprises full screening of both genes including analysis for large genomic rearrangements.     

RAD51C germline mutations found in Spanish site-specific breast cancer and breast-ovarian cancer families

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most well-known breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Additional genes involved in DNA repair have been identified as predisposing to breast cancer. Recently, RAD51C, a new Fanconi Anemia gene, essential for homologous recombination repair, has been reported to be a rare hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. Indeed, several pathogenic mutations have been identified in BRCA1/BRCA2-negative hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Here, we present the results of the screening of RAD51C mutations in a large series of 516 BRCA1/BRCA2-negative Spanish patients from breast and/or ovarian cancer families, and the evaluation of these results in the context of all RAD51C carriers. RAD51C mutation screening was performed by DNA analysis for all index cases. All the genetic variants identified were analyzed in silico for splicing and protein predictions. cDNA analysis was performed for three selected variants. All previous RAD51C mutation studies on breast and/or ovarian cancer were reviewed. We identified three inactivating RAD51C mutations. Two mutations were found in breast and ovarian cancer families and one mutation in a site-specific breast cancer family. Based on the mean age of ovarian cancer diagnosis in RAD51C carriers, we would recommend prophylactic bilateral salpingo-ophorectomy in premenopausal RAD51C mutation carriers. Our results support that RAD51C is a rare breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene and may contribute to a small fraction of families including breast and ovarian cancer cases and families with only breast cancer. Thus, RAD51C testing should be offered to hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer families without selecting for specific cancer origin.     

Mutation analysis of RAD51D in non-BRCA1/2 ovarian and breast cancer families

Background:

Recent data show that mutations in RAD51D have an aetiological role in ovarian carcinoma, yet mutations do not appear to be associated with an increased risk for breast cancer. We studied ovarian and breast cancer families having at least one woman affected by ovarian carcinoma, to assess the importance of RAD51D mutations in such families.

Methods:

The coding region of the RAD51D gene was analysed in 175 BRCA1/2-negative families with family histories of both ovarian and breast cancer ascertained from two Canadian and two Belgian institutions.

Results:

We identified one previously reported deleterious mutation, p.Arg186^* (c.556C>T), and two novel variants; missense substitution p.Cys119Arg and an intronic variant c.83-26A>G. p.Arg186^* segregated with the disease in the family and two ovarian carcinomas available for analysis showed loss of the wild-type allele, but the novel variants are likely neutral.

Conclusion:

RAD51D should be included in genetic screening of ovarian cancer families that do not have BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. We show that mutations are more likely to be found in families with two or more ovarian cancers, or in probands with first-degree relatives with ovarian cancer, and we feel testing should be preferentially offered to affected women from such families.     

Screening for BRCA2 mutations in 81 Dutch breast-ovarian cancer families

We have analysed 81 families with a history of breast and/or ovarian cancer for the presence of germline mutations in BRCA2 with a number of different mutation screening techniques. The protein truncation test (PTT) for exons 10 and 11 detected four different frame-shifting mutations in six of these families. Four of the remaining 75 families had given positive linkage evidence for being due to BRCA2. In these families the entire coding region was analysed by single-strand conformational polymorphism, leading to the detection of a non-sense and a splice-site mutation in two of them. While these studies were in progress, Southern analysis of BRCA1 revealed that in our study-population of 81 families, 15 families were segregating either the exon 13 or exon 22 deletion in BRCA1 (Petrij-Bosch et al (1997) Nat Genet 17: 341-345). This prompted us to examine BRCA2 in the remaining 58 families by Southern analysis, using two different restriction enzymes. No aberrations were found in the restriction patterns. Thus, contrary to BRCA1, large genomic rearrangements within the BRCA2 gene do not represent a major mutation mechanism among Dutch breast cancer families.     

Early detection of breast and ovarian cancer in families with BRCA mutations

Women at risk of breast and ovarian cancer due to a genetic predisposition may opt for preventive surgery or surveillance. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of surveillance in families with a BRCA mutation. Sixty-eight BRCA-families underwent surveillance using annual mammography, transvaginal ultrasound, and estimation of CA125. Two hundred and two women had at least one breast examination, and 138 at least one examination of the ovaries. After a mean follow-up of 33 months, breast cancer was detected in 21 women, four with lymph node metastases. After a mean follow-up of 37 months, six advanced ovarian cancers were detected. The percentage of metastatic breast cancers in the current study appeared to be acceptable. However, because these women have a high-risk of developing breast cancer, they still have a substantial risk of developing metastatic disease under surveillance. Surveillance for ovarian cancer was not effective.     

BRCA2 germline mutations in Japanese breast cancer families

Germline mutations of BRCA2 were examined in 20 Japanese breast cancer families without BRCA1 mutations, including one demonstrating cancer development in a male. Three different mutations, resulting in truncation of the BRCA2 protein, were detected in 3 different families. They were 9474insA (exon 24, termination at codon 3110), C8729A (exon 20, S2834 ter) and 982del4 (exon 9, termination at codon 275). The 982del4 mutation was detected in the family with a case of male breast cancer. Age at onset was young, with a range of 28-43 years, in the 2 female breast cancer families with truncation mutations. One probable missense mutation, A10462G (I3412V), was further detected in 2 families, although cosegregation of this allele with the breast cancer phenotype was not complete. The rate of BRCA2 mutations in Japanese families was suggested to be almost the same as in Western countries, and larger than it is the case for BRCA1. Int. J. Cancer 74:199-204, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 point mutations and large rearrangements in breast and ovarian cancer families in Northern Poland

Sixty-four Polish families with a history of breast and/or ovarian cancer were screened for mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes using a combination of denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and sequencing. Two thirds (43/64; 67%) of the families were found to carry deleterious mutations, of which the most frequent were BRCA1 5382insC (n=22/43; 51%) and Cys61Gly (n=9/43; 20%). Two other recurrent mutations were BRCA1 185delAG (n=3) and 3819del5 (n=4), together accounting for 16% of the 43 mutation-positive cases. We also found three novel mutations (BRCA1 2991del5, BRCA2 6238ins2del21 and 8876delC) which combined with findings from our earlier study of 60 Northern Polish families. Moreover, screening of 43 BRCA1/2 negative families for the presence of large rearrangements by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) resulted in the finding of two additional BRCA1 mutations: a deletion of exons 1A, 1B and 2, and a deletion of exons 17-19, both present in single families. We conclude that the Polish population has a diverse mutation spectrum influenced by strong founder effects. However, families with strong breast/ovarian cancer history who are negative for these common mutations should be offered a complete BRCA gene screening, including MLPA analysis.     

Screening for common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes: interest in genetic testing of Tunisian families with breast and/or ovarian cancer

BackgroundIn the Tunisian population, as yet a limited number of BRCA1/2 germline mutations have been reported in hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. These mutations are located in a few exons of BRCA1/2. The aim of the present study was to search for these mutations in 66 unrelated patients with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer in order to assess the interest in such a targeted approach for genetic testing in Tunisia.Materials and MethodsBlood specimens from the 66 Tunisian patients, with family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, were collected at the Salah Azaiz Cancer Institute of Tunis. The exons 5, 20 and part of exon 11 of BRCA1 as well as part of exons 10 and 11 of BRCA2 were analyzed by Sanger sequencing.Results12 patients had deleterious mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes (18%), including a novel frame-shift mutation of BRCA1 (c.3751dup; 3780insT). Four distinct BRCA1 mutations were detected eight patients: c.5266dup (5382insC) and c.211dup (330insA) each in three patients, c.3751dup (3870insT) and c.4041_4042del (4160delAG) each in one patient. The four remaining cases all carried the same BRCA2 mutation, c.1310_1313del (1538delAAGA). Besides these deleterious mutations, eight polymorphisms and unclassified variants were detected, one of them being never reported (BRCA1c.3030T>G, p.Pro1010Pro).ConclusionIn this study, we show that targeting relevant exons in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes allows detection of a substantial percentage of mutations in the Tunisian population. Therefore such an approach may be of interest in genetic testing of high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families in Tunisia.     

Associations between RAD51D germline mutations and breast cancer risk and survival in BRCA1/2-negative breast cancers

BackgroundRAD51D is involved in DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination and plays an important role in the maintenance of genomic stability. The associations between RAD51D germline mutations and breast cancer risk and survival are not fully elucidated.Patients and methodsRAD51D germline mutations were determined using a multigene panel in 7657 unselected breast cancer patients who were negative for BRCA1/2 germline mutations. The RAD51D recurrent mutation p.K91fs was screened in 7947 healthy controls by Sanger sequencing.ResultsA total of 29 cases (0.38%) carried deleterious RAD51D germline mutations among this cohort of 7657 unselected breast cancer patients. The RAD51D recurrent mutation p.K91fs was identified in 18 cases (0.24%) of these 7657 patients. In contrast, the p.K91fs mutation was found in 8 of 7947 healthy controls with a frequency of 0.10%. The RAD51D p.K91fs mutation was significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk in unselected breast cancer [odds ratio = 2.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–5.38; P = 0.040]. RAD51D mutation carriers were diagnosed at a younger age (P = 0.006) and were more likely to be triple-negative breast cancer (P = 0.003), estrogen receptor negative (P = 0.005) and high-grade cancers (P = 0.023) than noncarriers. Furthermore, RAD51D mutation carriers had a significantly worse recurrence-free survival [unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.00, 95% CI 1.56–5.80; P = 0.001] and distant recurrence-free survival (unadjusted HR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.14–5.67; P = 0.023) than noncarriers.ConclusionThe RAD51D recurrent mutation, p.K91fs, confers a moderately increased breast cancer risk, and RAD51D mutation carriers have an unfavorable survival compared with noncarriers.     

BRCA1-related breast cancer in Austrian breast and ovarian cancer families: Specific BRCA1 mutations and pathological characteristics

We identified 17 BRCA1mutations in 86 Austrian breast and ovarian cancer families (20%) that were screened for mutations by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and the protein<0B> <0R>truncation test (PTT). Eleven distinct mutations were detected, 4 of them (962del4, 2795del4, 3135del4 and L3376stop) not previously reported in families of non-Austrian origin. In addition, 6 rare missense mutations (allele frequency < 1%) with unknown biological effects were identified. Four mutations occurred more than once in the Austrian population: 2795del4 (3 times), Cys61Gly (3 times) 5382insC (2 times) and Q1806stop (2 times). Haplotype analysis of the 4 recurrent mutations suggested a common ancestor for each of these. Thirty-four breast cancer cases from 17 families with BRCA1 mutations were further analyzed. We observed a low median age of onset (39.5 years). Sixty-eight percent of all BRCA1 breast cancer cases had negative axillary lymph nodes. This group showed a significant prevalence of a negative estrogen and progesterone receptor status and stage I tumors compared with an age-related, node-negative control group. The prevalence of grade III tumors was marginally significant . Survival analysis either with a control group matched for age (within 5 years), grade, histologic subtype and estrogen receptor status, or with an age-related, node-negative comparison group, showed no statistical difference. Int. J. Cancer 77:354–360, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Characteristics of small breast and/or ovarian cancer families with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2

For families with a small number of cases of breast and/or ovarian cancer, limited data are available to predict the likelihood of genetic predisposition due to mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. In 104 families with three or more affected individuals (average 3.8) seeking counselling at family cancer clinics, mutation analysis was performed in the open reading frame of BRCA1 and BRCA2 by the protein truncation test and mutation-specific assays. In 31 of the 104 families tested, mutations were detected (30%). The majority of these mutations (25) occurred in BRCA1. Mutations were detected in 15 out of 25 families (60%) with both breast and ovarian cancer and in 16 out of 79 families (20%) with exclusively cases of breast cancer. Thus, an ovarian cancer case strongly predicted finding a mutation (P < 0.001). Within the group of small breast-cancer-only families, a bilateral breast cancer case or a unilateral breast cancer case diagnosed before age 40 independently predicted finding a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (P = 0.005 and P = 0.02, respectively). Therefore, even small breast/ovarian cancer families with at least one case of ovarian cancer, bilateral breast cancer, or a case of breast cancer diagnosed before age 40, should be referred for mutation screening.     

Loss of heterozygosity in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions in breast cancer

Background: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the 15q14-21 and 13q12-13 regions can contribute to the inactivation of RAD51 and BRCA2 genes implicated in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. We investigated allelic losses in microsatellites in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions, and their association with clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer. Methods: The LOH analysis was performed by amplifying DNA by PCR, using D15S118, D15S214, D15S1006 polymorphic markers in the 15q14-21 region and D13S260, D13S290 polymorphic markers in the 13q12-13 region in 36 sporadic breast cancer cases. Results: LOH in the RAD51 region ranged from 29% to 46% and in the BRCA2 region from 38% to 43% of informative cases. Eleven percent of the breast cancer cases displayed LOH for at least one studied marker in the RAD51 region exclusively. On the other hand, 44% of cases manifested statistically significant LOH for at least one microsatellite marker concomitantly in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions. LOH in the RAD51 region similarly as in the BRCA2 region appeared to correlate with steroid receptors content and lymph node status. Discussion: The obtained results indicate that alteration in RAD51 region may contribute to the disturbances of DNA repair involving RAD51 and/or BRCA2 penetration and thus enhance the risk of breast cancer development.     

Loss of heterozygosity in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions in breast cancer

Background: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the 15q14-21 and 13q12-13 regions can contribute to the inactivation of RAD51 and BRCA2 genes implicated in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. We investigated allelic losses in microsatellites in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions, and their association with clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer. Methods: The LOH analysis was performed by amplifying DNA by PCR, using D15S118, D15S214, D15S1006 polymorphic markers in the 15q14-21 region and D13S260, D13S290 polymorphic markers in the 13q12-13 region in 36 sporadic breast cancer cases. Results: LOH in the RAD51 region ranged from 29% to 46% and in the BRCA2 region from 38% to 43% of informative cases. Eleven percent of the breast cancer cases displayed LOH for at least one studied marker in the RAD51 region exclusively. On the other hand, 44% of cases manifested statistically significant LOH for at least one microsatellite marker concomitantly in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions. LOH in the RAD51 region similarly as in the BRCA2 region appeared to correlate with steroid receptors content and lymph node status. Discussion: The obtained results indicate that alteration in RAD51 region may contribute to the disturbances of DNA repair involving RAD51 and/or BRCA2 penetration and thus enhance the risk of breast cancer development.