Essential Japanese guidelines for the prevention of perioperative infections in the urological field: 2015 edition

After publication of the initial version of the Japanese guidelines for urological surgery in 2007, new surgical techniques have been introduced. Furthermore, several important issues, such as criteria for use of single‐dose antimicrobial prophylaxis and control of hospitalized infection, were also established, which led to alterations of the methods used for antimicrobial prophylaxis as well as perioperative management. The purpose of antimicrobial prophylaxis is to protect the surgical wound from contamination by normal bacterial flora. Antimicrobial prophylaxis should be based on penicillins with beta‐lactamase inhibitors, or first‐ or second‐generation cephalosporins, though penicillins without beta‐lactamase inhibitors should not be prescribed because of the high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. As an adequate intratissue concentration of the antimicrobial at the surgical site should be accomplished by the time of initiation of surgery, antimicrobial prophylaxis should be started up to 30 min before beginning the operation. Antimicrobial prophylaxis should be terminated within 24 h in clean and clean‐contaminated surgery, and within 2 days of surgery using the bowels, because a longer duration is a risk factor for surgical site infection development. Importantly, possible risk factors for surgical site infections include the antimicrobial prophylaxis methodology used as well as others, such as duration of preoperative hospitalization, hand washing, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, diabetes and smoking history. These guidelines are to be applied only for preoperatively non‐infected low‐risk patients. In cases with preoperative infection or bacteriuria that can cause a surgical site infection or urinary tract infection after surgery, patients must receive adequate preoperative treatment based on the individual situation.     

Absence of prophylactic antibiotics in minimum incision endoscopic urological surgery (MEUS) of adrenal and renal tumors

OBJECTIVE: Recently, some studies suggested that antimicrobial prophylactics (AMP) are not needed to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) for clean operations despite worldwide acceptance of AMP. However, appropriate use of AMP in urological surgery has not been fully studied. Herein, we report an attempt of gradual decrease of AMP to non-use of AMP in minimum incision endoscopic urological surgery (MEUS) of adrenal and renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated 95 consecutive patients who underwent 16 MEUS adrenalectomy and 79 MEUS radical and partial nephrectomy in our hospital. Patients were classified into the following three groups by means of prevention of SSI: the first step group received ampicillin sodium/sulbactam sodium 1.5 g i.v. 30 min before the operation; the second step group received a single 300 mg of levofloxacin orally 60 min before the operation; and the third step group received no AMP. Clinical backgrounds and incidences of SSI were compared among these three groups. RESULTS: The first, second and third step groups consisted of 31, 36 and 28 patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference among these groups in terms of clinical backgrounds including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index, and type and length of operation. The first step group had one superficial SSI that healed without any non-specific treatment. None of the second and third step groups had superficial SSI. There was no case of deep surgical site or distant infection. CONCLUSION: AMP could be discarded in clean MEUS of adrenal and renal tumors without increasing the incidence of SSI.     

Predictors of surgical site infection in dirty urological surgery

Objectives:   Risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) following urologic dirty operations have not been clearly identified. This study was conducted to describe incidence, potential risk factors and common causative pathogens of the SSI in such operations.
Methods:   Medical records of patients who had undergone simple nephrectomy or lumbotomy for suppurative renal infection at our institutions from 1999 to 2006 were retrospectively evaluated. The following data were retrieved: presence of SSI, demographic data, laboratory findings, comorbidities, microbiological data, type of renal suppuration, type of urological surgery and antibiotic regimen. Risk factors for SSI were evaluated using the multiple logistic regression model.
Results:   Sixty-five patients (mean age 55.6 ± 13.1 years) were eligible for data analysis. In 20 of them (30.8%) a SSI was identified. The most common isolated pathogens were gram-negative bacteria. At univariate logistic regression analysis risk factors significantly associated with SSI included: presence of emphysematous infection, hypoalbuminemia, number of predisposing conditions, emergency operations, isolation of Enterobacteriaceae, positive pus culture. The use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was associated with a decreased risk for SSI. Multiple logistic model identified only the emergency operations and isolated Enterobacteriaceae as independent predictors of SSI (odds ratio [OR] = 11.1) (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.0–40.8) and OR = 3.9 (1.0–14.8), respectively.
Conclusions:   Patients with suppurative renal infections are submitted to life-saving emergency surgery. Urological surgeons should keep in mind that this carries a high risk for subsequent SSI. Effective preventive measures in these circumstance cannot be identified. Further research in this area is necessary to clarify this issue.     

An updated meta-analysis on the effectiveness of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing breast surgical procedures

To systematically analyze published randomized trials on the effectiveness of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing breast surgical procedures. Trials on the effectiveness of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing breast surgery were selected and analyzed to generate summated data (expressed as risk ratio [RR]) by using RevMan 5.0. Nine randomized controlled trials encompassing 3720 patients undergoing breast surgery were retrieved from the electronic databases. The antibiotics group comprised a total of 1857 patients and non-antibiotics group, 1863 patients. There was no heterogeneity [χ(2) = 7.61, d.f. = 7, p < 0.37; I(2) = 8%] amongst trials. Therefore, in the fixed-effects model (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.83; z = 3.48; p < 0.0005), the use of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing breast surgical procedures was statistically significant in reducing the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). Furthermore, in the fixed-effects model (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.89-1.90; z = 1.37; p < 0.17), adverse reactions secondary to the use of prophylactic antibiotics was not statistically significant between the two groups. Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduce the risk of SSI after breast surgical procedures. The risk of adverse reactions from prophylactic antibiotic administration is not significant in these patients. Therefore, preoperative prophylactic antibiotics in breast surgery patients may be routinely administered. Further research is required, however, on risk stratification for SSI, timing and duration of prophylaxis, and the need for prophylaxis in patients undergoing breast reconstruction versus no reconstruction.     

围手术期不同抗生素使用时长对预防脊柱手术部位感染有效性的网状Meta分析

【摘要】 目的：对围手术期不同抗生素使用时长预防脊柱手术部位感染（surgical site infection,SSI）的有效性进行评价。方法：计算机检索PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library、中国知网、维普、万方数据库,搜集围手术期预防性抗生素的使用时长对降低脊柱SSI发生率的临床研究。研究类型包括随机对照试验（randomized controlled trial,RCT）和队列研究（cohort study,CS）。检索时限为2000年1月1日～2020年5月4日。由2名研究者严格遵循纳入与排除标准独立进行文献筛选、数据提取和文献质量评价。将抗生素使用时长分为单剂量组、术后24h组、术后48h组和术后超48h组。应用Stata 14软件进行网状Meta分析,比较不同抗生素使用时长对降低脊柱SSI发生率的有效性。结果：共纳入10篇文献,包括5篇RCT、2篇前瞻性队列研究和3篇回顾性队列研究,涉及4类抗生素使用时长（单剂量、术后24h、术后48h、术后超48h）。网状Meta分析结果显示：在降低脊柱SSI发生率方面,术后24h组[RR=0.48,95%CI （0.23,0.99）]和术后超48h组[RR=0.52,95%CI（0.32,0.84）]优于单剂量,其差异有统计学意义;排序结果显示术后24h组优于其他使用时长。结论：当前证据显示抗生素使用时长为术后24h时对预防脊柱SSI的效果最佳。     

A vascular multi-arm multi-stage trial to prevent groin wound surgical site infection: A feasibility survey

Surgical site infection (SSI) is common following arterial surgery involving a groin incision. There is a lack of evidence regarding interventions to prevent groin wound SSI, therefore, a survey of vascular clinicians was undertaken to assess current opinion and practice, equipoise and feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Participants at the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting were surveyed regarding three separate interventions designed to prevent SSI in the groin; impregnated incise drapes, diakylcarbomoyl chloride dressings and antibiotic impregnated collagen sponges. Results were collated via an online survey using the Research Electronic Data Capture platform. Seventy-five participants completed the questionnaire, most were consultant vascular surgeons (50/75, 66.7%). The majority agree that groin wound SSI is a major problem (73/75, 97.3%), and would be content using either of the three interventions (51/61, 83.6%) and had clinical equipoise to randomise patients to any of the three interventions versus standard of care (70/75, 93.3%). There was some reluctance to not use impregnated incise drapes as may be considered “standard of care”. Groin wound SSI is perceived as major problem in vascular surgery, and a multicentre RCT of three preventative interventions appears acceptable to vascular surgeons.     

Intrawound vancomycin powder in orthopaedic surgery as surgical site wound infection prophylaxis: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis research was executed to appraise the consequence of intrawound vancomycin powder (IWVP) in orthopaedic surgery (OPS) as surgical site wound infection (SSWI) prophylaxis. Inclusive literature research till March 2023 was carried out and 2756 interconnected researches were revised. Of the 18 picked researches enclosed 13 214 persons with OPS were in the used researches' starting point, 5798 of them were utilising IWVP, and 7416 were control. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to appraise the consequence of the IWVP in OPS as SSWI prophylaxis by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. IWVP had significantly lower SSWIs (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.74, P < .001), deep SSWIs (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.91, P = .02), and superficial SSWIs (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98, P = .04) compared with control in persons with OPS. IWVP had significantly lower SSWIs, deep SSWIs, and superficial SSWIs compared with control in persons with OPS. However, when interacting with its values, caution must be taken and more research is needed to confirm this finding.     

The prophylactic efficacy of rifampicin-soaked graft in combination with systemic vancomycin in the prevention of prosthetic vascular graft infection: an experimental study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prophylactic efficacy of systemic, topical, or combined antibiotic usage in the prevention of late prosthetic vascular graft infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) and the differential adherence of S. epidermidis to Dacron and ePTFE grafts in a rat model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Graft infections were established in the back subcutaneous tissue of 120 adult male Wistar rats by implantation of 1-cm(2) Dacron/ePTFE prosthesis followed by topical inoculation with 2 x 10(7) CFU of clinical isolate of MRSE. Each of the series included one group with no graft contamination and no antibiotic prophylaxis (uncontaminated control), one contaminated group that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis (untreated control), one contaminated group in which perioperative intraperitoneal prophylaxis with vancomycin (10 mg/kg) was administered, two contaminated groups that received rifampicin-soaked (5 mg/1 ml) or vancomycin-soaked (1 mg/1 ml) grafts, and one contaminated group that received a combination of rifampicin-soaked (5 mg/1 ml) graft with perioperative intraperitoneal vancomycin prophylaxis (10 mg/kg). The grafts were removed sterilely 7 days after implantation and evaluated by using sonication and quantitative blood agar culture. RESULTS: MRSE had significantly greater adherence to Dacron than ePTFE grafts in the untreated contaminated groups (P < 0.001). Rifampicin had better efficacy than vancomycin in topical application, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Intraperitoneal vancomycin showed a significantly higher efficacy than topical vancomycin or rifampicin (P < 0.001). The best results were provided by a combination of intraperitoneal vancomycin in rifampicin-soaked graft groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of rifampicin and intraperitoneal vancomycin seems to be the best choice for the prophylaxis of late prosthetic vascular graft infections caused by MRSE.     

Prevention of surgical site infection by antibiotic spraying in the operative field during cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE: Despite the many procedures introduced to prevent surgical site infection during cardiothoracic surgery, serious infections still occur. We attempted to reduce surgical site infection by spraying antibiotic solution in the operative field--a procedure since introduced at 4 other Japanese institutions. METHODS: In the latter half of 1990, we began spraying an antibiotic solution of cefazolin (1g) and gentamicin (40 mg)/40 ml of saline placed in a 50 ml syringe and dispensed through an 18 G needle bent at 60 to 80 degrees to clean the wound during surgery. RESULT: No deep surgical site infections or deaths due to infection have occurred among the 502 patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass at our hospital. This method was used in over 2,100 cases of similar procedures at 4 other institutions. There were 3 deaths due to severe surgical site infection (0.11%). At one institution treating over 1,000 cases a year, the incidence of death due to surgical site infection decreased significantly after this method was introduced. CONCLUSION: These preliminary experiences show that spraying antibiotic solution in the operative field reduces the risk of surgical site infection in cardiothoracic surgery.     

Threshold volumes for urological cancer surgery: a survey of UK urologists

OBJECTIVE: To determine minimum threshold levels of activity set by surgeons for urological cancer surgery, and to relate threshold levels to stated current procedural volume. METHODS: In all, 307 consultant urological surgeons were sent a questionnaire asking them to state for four urological cancer operations of different complexity their current procedural volume; whether minimum volume thresholds per surgeon should be implemented; and if so, the level of such thresholds; 212 (69%) replied. RESULTS: For all four procedures >/= 75% of surgeons advocated the setting of a minimum volume threshold. Overall, surgeons set the highest thresholds for radical prostatectomy and the lowest for radical cystectomy with continent diversion. There was no significant association between either the principle of supporting minimum volume thresholds or the level of such a threshold and the number of years worked as a consultant surgeon. The level of surgeon-derived minimum thresholds increased with increasing surgeon procedural volume. CONCLUSION: Most surgeons supported the principle of setting minimum volume thresholds. These thresholds appear to be influenced by current procedural volume and by procedural complexity. By setting thresholds greater than their current volume, some surgeons implicitly indicate that their current volume is insufficient to maintain their surgical competency.     

Nasal Methicillin-Resistant S. Aureus is a Major Risk for Mediastinitis in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

Background: Mediastinitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious complication after pediatric cardiac surgery. An outbreak of surgical site infections (SSIs) provided the motivation to implement SSI prevention measures in our institution.Methods: Subjects comprised 174 pediatric patients who underwent open-heart surgery after undergoing preoperative nasal culture screening. The incidence of SSIs and mediastinitis was compared between an early group, who underwent surgery before SSI measures (Group E, n = 73), and a recent group, who underwent surgery after these measures (Group R, n = 101), and factors contributing to the occurrence of mediastinitis were investigated.Results: The incidence of both SSIs and Mediastinitis has significantly decreased after SSI measures. With regard to factors that significantly affected mediastinitis, preoperative factors were “duration of preoperative hospitalization” and “preoperative MRSA colonization,” intraoperative factors were “Aristotle basic complexity score,” “operation time,” “cardiopulmonary bypass circuit volume” and “lowest rectal temperature.” And postoperative factor was “blood transfusion volume.” Patients whose preoperative nasal cultures were MRSA-positive suggested higher risk of MRSA mediastinitis.Conclusions: SSI prevention measures significantly reduced the occurrence of SSIs and mediastinitis. Preoperative MRSA colonization should be a serious risk factor for mediastinitis following pediatric cardiac surgeries.     

Effect of prophylactic negative pressure treatment for post-surgery groin wounds management in vascular surgery: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of prophylactic negative pressure treatment for post-surgery groin wounds management in vascular surgery. A systematic literature search up to April 2022 was performed and 1537 total number of groin vascular surgery incisions at the baseline of the studies; 729 of them were using the prophylactic negative pressure treatment, and 808 were using control. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of prophylactic negative pressure treatment for post-surgery groin wounds management in vascular surgery using the dichotomous, and contentious methods with a random or fixed-effect model. The prophylactic negative pressure treatment subjects had a significantly lower surgical site wound infection (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.16-0.42, P < .001) in subjects after vascular surgery compared with control. However, prophylactic negative pressure treatment did not show any significant difference in revision surgery (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.00, P = .05), readmission (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.32, P = .69), mortality in hospital (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29-1.01, P = .05), and length of hospital stay (MD, −0.24; 95% CI, −0.91-0.44, P = .49) compared with control in subjects after vascular surgery. The prophylactic negative pressure treatment subjects had a significantly lower surgical site wound infection and no significant difference in revision surgery, readmission, mortality in hospital, and length of hospital stay compared with control in subjects after vascular surgery. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of 2 out of 10 studies in the meta-analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons.     

Effect of prophylactic negative pressure treatment for post‐surgery groin wounds management in vascular surgery: A meta‐analysis

We performed a meta‐analysis to evaluate the effect of prophylactic negative pressure treatment for post‐surgery groin wounds management in vascular surgery. A systematic literature search up to April 2022 was performed and 1537 total number of groin vascular surgery incisions at the baseline of the studies; 729 of them were using the prophylactic negative pressure treatment, and 808 were using control. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of prophylactic negative pressure treatment for post‐surgery groin wounds management in vascular surgery using the dichotomous, and contentious methods with a random or fixed‐effect model. The prophylactic negative pressure treatment subjects had a significantly lower surgical site wound infection (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.16‐0.42, P < .001) in subjects after vascular surgery compared with control. However, prophylactic negative pressure treatment did not show any significant difference in revision surgery (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52‐1.00, P = .05), readmission (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66‐1.32, P = .69), mortality in hospital (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29‐1.01, P = .05), and length of hospital stay (MD, −0.24; 95% CI, −0.91‐0.44, P = .49) compared with control in subjects after vascular surgery. The prophylactic negative pressure treatment subjects had a significantly lower surgical site wound infection and no significant difference in revision surgery, readmission, mortality in hospital, and length of hospital stay compared with control in subjects after vascular surgery. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of 2 out of 10 studies in the meta‐analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons.