Anti-HLA Antibodies After Precocious Transplantectomy by Vascular Thrombosis

Background

Our objective in this study was to determine the effects of early renal transplantectomy on patients and the production of anti–human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies.

Specificity of preformed alloantibodies causing B cell positive flow crossmatch in renal transplantation

The specificity of alloantibodies (alloAb) and their clinical significance in association with T-/B+ flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) in kidney transplantation are not clearly defined. This study was undertaken to examine the HLA specificity and clinical relevance of Ab causing B+ FCXM in pre-transplant (final XM) recipients' serum samples. Final FCXM serum samples were analyzed from 457 renal transplant patients followed for 10 months post-transplantation. Two hundred and sixty patients had T-/B+ final FCXM. The control group included 197 recipients with T-/B- FCXM at time of transplantation. Class I/class II PRA and specificity of anti-HLA class I and class II Ab in final FCXM serum samples were analyzed by FlowPRA Class I Screening Test and FlowPRA Class II Screening Test. We found no correlation between graft outcome and pre-transplant T-/B- and T-/B+ FCXM status. Additionally, we observed no clinical relevance of B+ FCXM in retransplant patients. However, MCS > or =200 in B+ FCXM retransplant recipients was associated with anti-class II Ab to previous mismatches in regrafted patients (n = 46). This finding was confirmed by specificity analysis of anti-DR/DQ Ab in patients with high ( > or =15%) class II PRA. In 63% (12 of 19) of retransplants having T-/B+ FCXM, we defined the specificity of alloAb to first graft mismatched class II antigens. In contrast, anti-class II Ab was detected in only 5.7% (2 of 35) of single-graft recipients with different PRA values. Significantly greater MCS (240 +/- 61 vs. 163 +/- 48; p = 0.022) was observed in retransplant patients having short ( < or =5 m) previous graft survival time (PGST) than in those with long PGST ( > or =5 m). Only 2% of retransplant recipients with B + FCXM had non-HLA Ab. In contrast, the overwhelming majority of primary recipients had no detectable alloAbs. No significant difference in class I PRA was found between B- and B+ FCXM recipients. However, class II PRA was significantly higher in patients having B + FCXM (p = 0.028). Collectively, these data show that MCS intensity is not always a reliable criterion for anti-HLA Ab detection because of the presence of non-HLA Ab. These results can be explained by low titers of anti-class II Ab, at which concentration these Ab cannot produce a deleterious effect. FlowPRA and Flow screen beads appeared to be reliable and sensitive methods for detection and specificity analysis of anti-class II alloAb.     

Panel reactive antibody positivity and associated HLA antibodies in Turkish renal transplant candidates

Pre- and post-renal transplantation panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening is associated with increased incidence of hyperacute or acute graft rejection and graft loss. This study was designed to find any relationship PRA sensitization and associated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies in Turkish renal transplant candidates. We included 340 patients who were in the renal transplantation waiting list in the study. We determined PRA sensitization ratio and the associated anti-HLA IgG antibody distribution of the patient group. The PRA testing was currently performed and levels above 30% were accepted to be positive. The PRA class I positivity was determined in 24 (7%) and class II in 34 (10%) of the patients. The most frequent HLA antibodies for class I were B56, A2, A34, A1, A23, A24 and B61; and for class II were DR11, DR14, DQ7, DR10, DQ5, DR1 and DR7, respectively. From these, the increase of the numbers of anti-HLA class II antibodies was significantly correlated with the increase of PRA sensitization ratio. In conclusion, the identification of the associated HLA-specific antibodies and correlation with the Turkish population HLA antigen distribution will identify the high-risk patients who are candidates for transplantation.     

The correlation of results of panel reactive antibody,identification, and single antigen beads in detection of anti-HLA antibodies: Istanbul Faculty of Medicine,tissue typing laboratory experience

BackgroundWe have performed a retrospective analysis of anti-HLA class I MHC and class II MHC antibodies measured using a single antigen bead (SAB) assay and a panel reactive antibody (PRA) assay.Material and methodsA group of 256 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was tested for anti-HLA antibodies in the tissue typing laboratory between 2017 and 2020. In the cohort, the serum samples of patients waiting for transplantation were tested. Both the PRA and SAB tests of these patients were analyzed using the Luminex (Immucor) method. The threshold of positivity was accepted as median fluorescence intensities (MFI) ≥1000 for PRA screening and MFI ≥750 for SAB screening.ResultsOverall, antibodies to HLA antigens were detected in 202 (78.9%) out of 256 patients in the PRA study. Antibodies against both class I/II antigens were detected only in 15.6% of these patients, whereas antibodies against only against class I HLA in 31.3% and only against class II HLA in 32.0%. By comparison, the SAB study found that 66.8% of patients were positive for HLA antigens. Furthermore, donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were detected in 52.0% of PRA-positive patients and 52.6% of SAB-positive patients. It was shown that 168 patients (83.2%) out of 202 PRA-positive patients were found to be SAB-positive. In addition, 51 patients negative in the SAB assay (94.4%) were also negative in the PRA assay. Statistical analysis established a significant correlation between the PRA and SAB positivity (p > 0.001).It was also shown that MFI ≥3000 PRA positivity for class I HLA antigens (p = 0.049) and MFI ≥5000 PRA positivity for class II antigens (p < 0.001) correlated with the SAB positivity in patients.ConclusionOur results showed the importance of both PRA and SAB assays to define the status of sensitization in patients.     

Flow cytometric crossmatching and panel-reactive antibodies in chronic renal failure patients

Aim

Anti-donor antibodies, denoted as “panel-reactive antibodies” (PRAs), are one of the most important factors influencing graft survival after renal transplantation. PRA is generally analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or flow cytometry (FC), which identify the HLA antigen specific for the preformed antibody.

Patients and methods

We tested 66 patients for FC crossmatch (FCXM) when they were called for cadaveric renal transplantation. Thirty of 66 patients were FCXM-positive; 36 were FCXM-negative. Among the FCXM positive crossmatches, 21 were T- and B-cell positive; seven B positive; and two T positive. The HLA antibodies in the sera of FCXM-positive patients were reanalyzed using flow-PRA.

Results

We detected HLA antibodies in 28/66 sera with flow PRA. The sera of 16/21 T-/B-, FCXM-positive patients contained both class I and II anti-HLA antibodies, five had only class I anti-HLA antibodies. One out of seven B-cell FCXM-positive patients had class I and class II anti-HLA antibodies, three, class I and 1 class II anti-HLA antibodies; the other two were negative. Class I and class II HLA antibodies were observed in two T-cell FCXM-positive patients. Four of 36 patients who were FCXM-negative were flow PRA positive: one had both class I and class II HLA antibodies and three, only class I HLA antibody. The comparison of FCXM and flow PRA results was significant (P = .001).

Conclusion

FCXM results may be confirmed by flow PRA tests, an important method to differentiate HLA versus non-HLA antibodies.     

Multiscreen serum analysis of highly sensitized renal dialysis patients for antibodies toward public and private class I HLA determinants. Implications for computer-predicted acceptable and unacceptable donor mismatches in kidney transplantation

A multiscreen serum analysis program has been developed that permits a determination of antibody specificity for the vast majority of highly sensitized patients awaiting transplantation. This program is based on a 2 x 2 table analysis of correlations between serum reactivity with an HLA-typed cell panel and incorporates two modifications. One implements the concept of public HLA determinants based on the serologic crossreactivity among class I HLA antigens. The other modification derives from the premise that most highly sensitized patients maintain the same PRA and antibody profiles over many months and even years. Monthly screening results for patients with persistent PRA values can therefore be combined for analysis. For 132 of 150 highly sensitized patients with greater than 50% PRA, this multiscreen serum analysis program yielded information about antibody specificity toward public and private class I HLA determinants. The vast majority of patients (108 of 112) with PRA values between 50 and 89% showed antibody specificity generally toward one, two, or three public markers and/or the more common private HLA-A,B antigens. For 24 of 38 patients with greater than 90% PRA, it was possible to define one or few HLA-specific antibodies. The primary objective of the multiscreen program was to develop an algorithm about computer-predicted acceptable and unacceptable donor HLA-A,B antigens for patients with preformed antibodies. A retrospective analysis of kidney transplants into 89 highly sensitized patients has demonstrated that allografts with unacceptable HLA-A,B mismatches had significantly lower actuarial survival rates than those with acceptable mismatches (P = 0.01). This was shown for both groups of 32 primary transplants (44% vs. 67% after 1 year) and 60 retransplants (50% vs. 68%). Also, serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in patients with unacceptable class I mismatches (3.0 vs. 8.4 mg% [P = 0.007] after 2 weeks; 3.9 vs. 9.1 mg% [P = 0.014] after 4 weeks). Histopathologic analysis of allograft tissue specimens from 47 transplant recipients revealed a significantly higher incidence of humoral rejection (P = 0.02), but not cellular rejection, in the unacceptable mismatch group. These results suggest that the multiscreen program can establish which donor HLA-A,B mismatches must be avoided in kidney transplantation for most highly sensitized patients. For 18 of 150 high PRA renal dialysis patients, the multiscreen program could not define HLA-specific antibody. Most patients had greater than 90% PRA, and many of their sera appeared to contain IgM type nonspecific lymphocytotoxins that could be inactivated by dithioerythreitol (DTE).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Interferon-alpha therapy and anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies in hepatitis C virus-positive patient: case report

Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) is currently the only treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Yet it can induce acute renal transplantation rejection possibly by stimulating humoral responses. We tested patient sera for detection of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies observing an increased panel-reactive antibodies value after IFN-alpha therapy. Then, we also investigated whether antiviral treatment with IFN-alpha was related to an increased and/or different production of class I and class II anti-HLA antibodies. Patient sera analysis performed by a cytofluorimetric method using flow PRA tests showed the appearance of new HLA-antibody specificities. This study underlined that INF-alpha therapy modifies a patient's immune profile; hence, it is recommended to confirm HLA-antibody specificities after treatment in order to protect recipients from enhanced rejection risk owing to a false-negative donor-specific cross-match.     

Flow-PRA evaluation for antibody screening in patients awaiting kidney transplantation

Flow-PRA is a flow cytometric method for both anti-HLA class I and class II antibody (Ab) detection. We evaluated this technique for Ab screening in patients awaiting kidney transplantation. After having established a rigorous threshold for positivity, a three-dilution difference in sensitivity between Flow-PRA and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) persisted. The sensitivity of the method was satisfactory since all CDC-positive sera were also found to be positive with the Flow-PRA method. Discrimination between anti-HLA class I and class II Abs was excellent. Furthermore, all sera responsible for a positive flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) and a negative CDC-crossmatch (CDCXM) at the time of a putative transplant were found to be positive with Flow-PRA beads. The specificity was excellent for anti-class I Ab detection since no false positive serum was found. On the other hand, the specificity was lower for anti-class II detection, since 8.3% (2/24) false positive results were detected among all the negative sera tested. Overall, our results suggested that Flow-PRA should be of value for anti-HLA Ab screening prior to kidney transplantation.     

Interferon-α Therapy and Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies in Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Patient: Case Report

Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) is currently the only treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Yet it can induce acute renal transplantation rejection possibly by stimulating humoral responses. We tested patient sera for detection of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies observing an increased panel-reactive antibodies value after IFN-α therapy. Then, we also investigated whether antiviral treatment with IFN-α was related to an increased and/or different production of class I and class II anti-HLA antibodies. Patient sera analysis performed by a cytofluorimetric method using flow PRA tests showed the appearance of new HLA-antibody specificities. This study underlined that INF-α therapy modifies a patient’s immune profile; hence, it is recommended to confirm HLA-antibody specificities after treatment in order to protect recipients from enhanced rejection risk owing to a false-negative donor-specific cross-match.     

Clinical relevance of low levels of preformed alloantibodies detected by flow cytometry in the first year post-kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of transplants performed with a false-negative cytotoxicity cross-match and to analyze the clinical relevance of alloantibodies (Ab) detected only by flow cytometry (flow). METHODS: We studied 66 patients undergoing kidney transplantation from a cadaveric donor. All patients had a simultaneous negative T+AHG+DTT and B+DTT. Pretransplant sera were retrospectively analyzed by flow cytometry according to an Emory University protocol: (1) T+ and B-: Ab anti-class I; (2) T- and B+: anti-class II; (3) T+B+: anti-class I + II. Chi-square, Fisher exact, Student t test, and Kaplan Meier analyses were employed with significance assigned at P < or = .05. RESULTS: The overall incidence of false-negative cytotoxicity was 33.3% (22/66), namely, 6.1% (n = 4) anti-class I; 9.1% (n = 6) anti-class II; and 18.2% (n = 12) anti-class I + II. Primary nonfunctioning grafts occurred in 6.8% (3/44) and 13.6% (3/22) negative and positive flow patients (two anti-class I + II and one class II; P = .39). The incidence of graft loss in the first year was respectively, 13.6% (6/44) and 18.2% (4/22; two anti-class II and two anti-class I + II; P = .72). Compared to flow-negative grafts, creatinine levels were significantly higher among flow-positive patients at 8 and 12 weeks. One-year graft survivals were 86.4% among negative versus 81.8% for the positive group (P = .67). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that 33% of kidney transplant recipients had low levels of alloantibodies detected only by flow. This single factor was associated with the worst graft function in the first trimester with a suggestion of a higher risk for non-functioning graft.     

Flow cytometric detection of HLA-specific antibodies as a predictor of heart allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: Historically, panel reactive antibody (PRA) analysis to detect HLA antibodies has been performed using cell-based complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) techniques. Recently, a flow cytometric procedure (FlowPRA) was introduced as an alternative approach to detect HLA antibodies. The flow methodology, using a solid phase matrix to which soluble HLA class I or class II antigens are attached is significantly more sensitive than CDC assays. However, the clinical relevance of antibodies detected exclusively by FlowPRAhas not been established. In this study of cardiac allograft recipients, FlowPRA was performed on pretransplant sera with no detectable PRA activity as assessed by CDC assays. FlowPRA antibody activity was then correlated with clinical outcome. METHODS: PRA analysis by anti-human globulin enhanced (AHG) CDC and FlowPRA was performed on sera corresponding to final cross-match specimens from 219 cardiac allograft recipients. In addition, sera collected 3-6 months posttransplant from 91 patients were evaluated. The presence or absence of antibodies was correlated with episodes of rejection and patient survival. A rejection episode was considered to have occurred based on treatment with antirejection medication and/or histology. RESULTS: By CDC, 12 patients (5.5%) had pretransplant PRA >10%. In contrast, 72 patients (32.9%) had pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies detectable by FlowPRA (34 patients with only class I antibodies; 7 patients with only class II antibodies; 31 patients with both class I and class II antibodies). A highly significant association (P<0.001) was observed between pretransplant HLA antibodies detected by FlowPRA and episodes of rejection that occurred during the first posttransplant year. Fifteen patients died within the first year posttransplant. Of nine retrospective flow cytometric cross-matches that were performed, two were in recipients who had no pretransplant antibodies detectable by FlowPRA. Both of these cross-matches were negative. In contrast, five of seven cross-matches were positive among recipients who had FlowPRA detectable pretransplant antibodies. Posttransplant serum specimens from 91 patients were also assessed for antibodies by FlowPRA. Among this group, 58 patients had FlowPRA antibodies and there was a trend (although not statistically significant) for a biopsy documented episode of rejection to have occurred among patients with these antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our data suggest that pre- and posttransplant HLA antibodies detectable by FlowPRA and not AHG-CDC identify cardiac allograft recipients at risk for rejection. Furthermore, a positive donor reactive flow cytometric cross-match is significantly associated with graft loss. Thus, we believe that detection and identification of HLA-specific antibodies can be used to stratify patients into high and low risk categories. An important observation of this study is that in the majority of donor:recipient pairs, pretransplant HLA antibodies were not directed against donor antigens. We speculate that these non-donor-directed antibodies are surrogate markers that correspond to previous T cell activation. Thus, the rejection episodes that occur in these patients are in response to donor-derived MHC peptides that share cryptic determinants with the HLA antigens that initially sensitized the patient.     

Frequency of Human Leukocyte Antigens and Donor Specific Antibodies in Long-Term Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

PurposeHLA antibodies have been shown to be associated with late graft loss. In this study, we defined the incidence and profiles of anti-HLA antibodies and their impact on graft outcome in long-term kidney recipients.MethodsThe sera of 118 kidney transplant recipients were screened for anti-HLA antibody presence. The antigen specificity of the detected HLA class I and class II antibodies was identified using a Luminex assay (Luminex Corp, Austin, TX, United States). Presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) was examined in individuals with anti-HLA antibodies using the Luminex method.ResultsAnti-HLA class I and/or class II antibodies were detected in serum of 16.1% of the kidney transplant patients. The antibodies were directed against HLA class I antigens in 4 patients (21.1%), HLA class II antigens in 9 patients (47.4%), and both class I and class II antigens in 6 patients (31.6%). The overall prevalence of DSA was 10.2%. Anti-HLA antibodies were significantly associated with higher rate of cyclosporine use. Presence of DSA was associated with a lower rate of tacrolimus use, a higher rate of cyclosporine use, and lower donor age. Presence of anti-HLA antibodies was associated with higher acute cellular rejection and higher chronic active humoral rejection rates. Presence of DSA was associated with chronic active humoral rejection.ConclusionThe presence of either HLA antibodies or DSA significantly correlated with lower graft survival, poor transplant function, and proteinuria.     

HLA class I residue mismatch and renal graft outcome

Abstract Donor‐recipient HLA matching was retrospectively evaluated in 111 cadaveric renal transplants using Takemoto's ten‐residue model in which HLA class I antigens are clustered by crossreactive group (CREGs) on the basis of amino acid sequence homology and the sharing of a particular public epitope. The grade and type of HLA residue mismatching were correlated to post‐transplant, class I donor‐specific antibody production (monitored by flow cytometry crossmatch), rejection occurrence and clinical outcome during the 1st year posttransplant. In 52 patients with 0 mis‐matchings (MMs) we observed a low incidence of rejection (11.1%) and antibody production (11.1 %) for 0 CREG MM grade, while 1 MM was enough to increase immune response against graft (rejection 35%; antibodies 30%). Moreover, a significant correlation was observed between Q144, E163, Q62 and L82/R82 epitopes and the incidence of acute rejection and antibody production (“immunogenic” residues) in patients grouped for a single residue mismatch.     

Clinical importance of anti-human leukocyte antigen-specific antibody concentration in performing calculated panel reactive antibody and virtual crossmatches

BACKGROUND: Highly sensitized patients develop multi-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) specific antibodies. This study measures concentrations of anti-HLA antibodies in multispecific sera by converting fluorescence intensity into molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF) units. This was used to determine MESF units required for a positive T and B flow crossmatches (FLXM). METHODS: MESF values of negative controls and sera from patients devoid of HLA antibodies were measured by FLXM and flow panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening beads. Fluorescence intensity values of anti-HLA specific antibodies determined by FlowPRA single antigen beads of highly sensitized patients were converted into MESF units. In addition, endpoint titers, MESF units, and % PRA of 26 sera were established. RESULTS: MESF analysis accurately predicted the outcomes of 100% of T and B FLXM of sera with strong (MESF units>18,000) donor-specific antibody (DSA). The predictive values of T and B FLXM declined to 95% and 88% with weak DSA (6,000 MESF<10,000). Endpoint titers of sera from highly sensitized patients ranged from 1:512 to 1:8 with corresponding MESF values of 452,596 to 20,000 units. However, there was no statistical difference in PRA values among these sera (95%-100%). We successfully transplanted five patients who had weak donor-specific HLA antibodies (MESF units>2,000). The graft survival at 1 year was 100% and there was no evidence of DSA posttransplant. CONCLUSION: MESF analysis is both a time and cost efficient way of measuring antibody strength. The strength of the antibody present in the sera of transplant candidates is critical for crossmatch prediction.     

Immunogenic human leukocyte antigen class II antigens on human cardiac valves induce specific alloantibodies

Background. The kinetics of panel reactive antibodies (PRA) and incidence of antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II were studied in patients who received a cryopreserved cardiac valve allograft.

Methods. A complement-dependent microlymphocytotoxicity test was used to determine the percentage of panel reactive antibodies. Anti–HLA class II antibodies were measured by two-color fluorescence assays.

Results. The panel reactive antibodies became positive in 25 (78%) of 32 recipients between 1 and 16 months after implantation. Antibodies against HLA class II antigens were detected in 11 (37%) of 30 patients. In 9 (82%) of 11 cases these antibodies were donor specific. The induction of antibodies against donor HLA class II antigens suggests that intact HLA class II antigens are expressed by viable cells within the graft. Dithiothreitol analysis showed that the antibodies were of the immunoglobulin G type. Apparently, the HLA class II antigens are expressed in an immunogeneic way, as activation of specific T-helper cells is essential for the switch from immunoglobulin M to immunoglobulin G antibodies.

Conclusions. Allogeneic valve transplantation is associated with the production of donor-specific anti–HLA class I and II antibodies that could contribute to graft failure. This possibly detrimental effect might be prevented by cross matching in sensitized patients.     

Detection of donor-specific anti-HLA class I and II antibodies using antibody monitoring system

The antibody monitoring system (AMS, GTI Inc) is a solid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) crossmatch test for the detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody to donor-specific solubilized HLA class I and class II antigens. The objective of this study was to compare the results of the AMS assay with donor-specific anti-HLA IgG antibodies (DS-HLA Abs), as determined by ELISA panel reactive antibody (PRA) and the flow cytometric crossmatch test (FCXM). A total of 107 sera were screened for the presence of HLA Abs by ELISA PRA (LAT-M, One-Lambda Inc), the DS-HLA Abs were determined in 34 serum samples (31.8%) by an ELISA panel (LAT class I and class II, One-Lambda Inc) and FCXM. The FCXM and AMS assays were performed with matched lymphocytes from 56 donors. There was a significant degree of concordance (89.7%) between the two tests (P < .001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of AMS assay to detect DS-HLA Abs was 88.2%, 94.5%, 88.2%, and 94.5%, respectively. The AMS is a simple, objective test, which has several advantages over the cell-based crossmatch test, such as elimination of non-HLA antibody reactivity, elimination of non-donor-specific antibody reactivity, no need for viable cells, and preparation of the donor's HLA antigens in advance. In summary, this study suggested that AMS may be useful as a supportive crossmatch test or as a monitoring test after transplantation to detect class I or class II DS-HLA Abs.     

HLA class I sensitization in islet transplant recipients: report from the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a promising treatment option for patients severely affected with type 1 diabetes. This report from CITR presents pre- and posttransplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I sensitization rates in islet-alone transplantation. Data came from 303 recipients transplanted with islet-alone between January 1999 and December 2008. HLA class I sensitization was determined by the presence of anti-HLA class I antibodies. Panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) from prior to islet infusion and at 6 months, and yearly posttransplant was correlated to measures of islet graft failure. The cumulative number of mismatched HLA alleles increased with each additional islet infusion from a median of 3 for one infusion to 9 for three infusions. Pretransplant PRA was not predictive of islet graft failure. However, development of PRA >20% posttransplant was associated with 3.6-fold (p < 0.001) increased hazard ratio for graft failure. Patients with complete graft loss who had discontinued immunosuppression had significantly higher rate of PRA ≥ 20% compared to those with functioning grafts who remained on immunosuppression. Exposure to repeat HLA class I mismatch at second or third islet infusions resulted in less frequent development of de novo HLA class I antibodies when compared to increased class I mismatch. The development of HLA class I antibodies while on immunosuppression is associated with subsequent islet graft failure. The risk of sensitization may be reduced by minimizing the number of islet donors used per recipient, and in the absence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, repeating HLA class I mismatches with subsequent islet infusions.     

Human leukocyte antigen and major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain a antibodies after kidney transplantation in Turkish renal transplant recipients

Background

This study was designed to determine whether human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related A (MICA) antibody (Ab) production during the first 6 months posttransplantation correlated with long-term graft survival and rejection rate. The study group included 147 first transplantations from either living related (LRDs) or deceased donors (DDs) who were divided into two subgroups: rejection (RG, n = 28) and nonrejection (NRG, n = 119). Serum samples (n = 441) collected from each patient on posttransplant days 30, 90, and 180 were tested for HLA and MICA Ab using the Luminex technique.

Results

Among 82 Ab-positive patients (55.8%), 40 had both HLA and MICA, 33 only HLA, and 9 only MICA Ab in the posttransplant period. The rates of HLA class I, class II, or both Ab positivities were greater in the RG than the NRG (P = .011, .037, and .0275, respectively). At 180 days posttransplant, 64.3% of patients in the RG had Ab and 41.2% in the NRG (P = .0349). The data for the LRD (n = 116) group were similar to those for the entire group; whereas there was no significant difference in Ab positivity between RG and NRG patients who received organs from DDs. There was no significant difference with respect to HLA class II and/or MICA Ab positivity between RG and NRG among patients who lacked HLA class I Ab.

Discussion

We confirmed that HLA and MICA Ab may be harmful posttransplant, promoting rejection processes and representing an important cause of graft failure. HLA class II and MICA Ab positivities were only important predictors of graft failure when present together with HLA class I positivity. Patients who developed HLA alone or both HLA and MICA Ab rejected their grafts more frequently than Ab-negative recipients.     

Development of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I or II antibodies following left ventricular assist device implantation: effects on subsequent allograft rejection and survival.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have indicated that antibodies to HLA class I or II antigens develop in approximately 60% of patients following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, subsequent rates of allograft rejection are higher, and survival is adversely affected. METHODS: We performed an analysis of the incidence of antibody development to HLA class I or II antigens by panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening following implantation of the HeartMate LVAD in 38 patients from October 1, 1996 to March 1, 2000 (6 LVAD deaths excluded from study). The occurrence of vascular or cellular rejection of International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grade > or = 3A, as determined by endomyocardial biopsy following heart transplantation (HTX), were compared for patients with (n = 32, LVAD group) or without (n = 68, control group) preoperative LVAD support. RESULTS: After LVAD implantation, 9 patients (28%) in the LVAD group developed IgG antibodies to class I (n = 3), class II (n = 5), or both antigens (n = 1) with PRA > 10%. The remaining 23 patients (72%) had either no detectable IgG antibody development or IgG antibody development with PRA < 10%. At the time of HTX, only 4 patients in the LVAD group had persistent PRA > 10%. Only 3 patients (4%) in the control group had PRA > 10% at the time of HTX. The incidence of patients free from rejection at 6 and 12 months was 62% and 44% for the control group, and 49%, and 40% for the LVAD group, respectively (p not significant). The mean linearized rate plus or minus standard deviation of allograft rejection from 0 to 6 months and 7 to 12 months was 0.13 +/- 0.21 and 0.09 +/- 0.14 episodes a month, respectively, for patients with no LVAD support, and 0.17 +/-.25 and 0.06 +/- 0.1 episodes a month, respectively, for those with LVAD support (p = not significant). Post-transplantation survival at 1 and 2 years was 90% and 90%, respectively, for the control group, and 97% and 92%, respectively, for the LVAD group (p not significant). CONCLUSION: Patients with LVAD support before HTX do not appear to be at increased risk for significant allograft rejection in the first year or for death within the first 2 years after transplantation.