Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

By 2004, only 9.2% of women in the United States with prior cesareans underwent a term of labor (TOL), although nearly two thirds of these women are actually candidates for a TOL. In this article, the author notes that the principal risk associated with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC)-TOL is uterine rupture, which can lead to perinatal death, fetal hypoxic brain injury, and hysterectomy. Risk factors for uterine rupture include number of prior cesareans, prior vaginal delivery, interdelivery interval, and uterine closure technique. The author concludes by noting that a pregnant woman with prior cesarean delivery is at risk for maternal and perinatal complications, whether undergoing TOL or choosing elective repeat operation. Complications of both procedures should be discussed and an attempt made to individualize the risk for uterine rupture and the likelihood of successful VBAC.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

VBAC is considered safe and is often successful in carefully selected populations of women. Women with prior CDs are given the option of elective repeat CD or a trial of labor; neither option is risk free. Less morbidity is encountered in women with successful VBACs versus those with elective repeat CD. Patients who undergo successful trials of labor experience fewer blood transfusions, fewer postpartum infections, and shorter hospital stays and generally have no increased perinatal mortality. The high CD rate begins with the high frequency of the first CD. Therefore, a concerted effort should be made to decrease primary CDs. Paul and Miller remind us of the importance of the decision to proceed with the initial CD in their statement, "once a cesarean, always a scar (p 1907)." Many patients present for prenatal care with one or more prior uterine scars. Careful and thoughtful counseling of patients with a previous CD regarding the risks and benefits of a labor trial based on the current available literature is prudent. Pitkin's editorial in Obstetrics and Gynecology in 1991 stated, "Without question, the most remarkable change in obstetric practice over the last decade involves management of the woman with a prior cesarean delivery (p 939)." Controversies regarding the management of women with scarred uteri remain. In his review of the CD controversy, Flamm leaves us with an important thought: "A woman with a prior cesarean is at increased risk regardless of her mode of birth, and eliminating VBAC will not eliminate the risks. Vigilance with respect to primary cesarean delivery is the only way to avoid this dilemma (p 315)."     

剖宫产后阴道分娩相关问题

剖宫产后再次妊娠的分娩方式始终是一个具有争议的产科问题。随着我国全面实施“二孩”政策,剖宫产后阴道分娩问题越来越受到关注。目前,多个妇产科学术机构已达成共识：计划性剖宫产后阴道分娩对于大多数一次子宫下段剖宫产史的产妇是一种安全的选择。文章就剖宫产后阴道分娩的相关循证医学证据进行讨论,并为有剖宫产后阴道试产意愿的产妇制定产前、产时管理方案。     

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: evidence-based practice

Given the high national rate of cesarean delivery in current obstetric practice, patients considering vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in subsequent pregnancies are frequently encountered. A recently growing body of literature on VBAC has produced concrete evidence to define the VBAC-associated risks and identify factors influencing success. An evidence-based approach can guide practitioners and patients through the complex counseling, decision-making, and management issues when considering VBAC delivery.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean

Allowing a woman with a previous cesarean birth a trial of labor rather than performing an elective repeat cesarean section continues to be a controversial area in obstetrics today. In an effort to evaluate the risks associated with a trial of labor, a prospective investigation was undertaken from July 1, 1982, through June 30, 1984. During the first year of the study, patients with a known vertical scar or more than one prior cesarean birth were excluded from an attempted trial of labor. Beginning July 1, 1983, patients with two prior cesarean births were no longer excluded and were studied prospectively. During this 2-year period, 32,854 patients were delivered of their infants at the Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center. Of these patients, 2708 (8.2%) had undergone a prior cesarean birth, and 1796 women (66%) underwent a trial of labor. A total of 1465 (81%) of them achieved a vaginal delivery. Successful vaginal delivery by the number of prior cesarean sections was as follows: one, 82%; two, 72%; three, 90%. When contrasted with the group without a trial of labor, the group with a trial of labor had significantly less maternal morbidity. In a comparison of the groups with and without a trial of labor, the incidence of uterine dehiscence (1.9% versus 1.9%) and rupture (0.3% versus 0.5%) was similar. With the application of attempted vaginal delivery in our patients with a previous cesarean birth, we were able to reduce our cesarean delivery rate for this population alone by 54%. In summary, the benefits associated with a trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth far outweigh the risks. The policy of "once a cesarean section, always a cesarean section" should be abandoned.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the West African setting.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the fetal weight beyond which women with one previous cesarean delivery (CD) are most likely to have a repeat CD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 586 women who had one previous CD and were undergoing trial of labor was conducted in Accra, Ghana. Following delivery, the women were allocated to one of three groups according to whether they had a successful vaginal delivery, underwent a CD for cephalopelvic disproportion, or underwent a CD for another indication. The groups were then compared using analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of fetal weight on the odds of having a repeat CD. RESULTS: A fetal weight greater than 3.45 kg tripled the odds of having a repeat CD, and the probability of having a repeat CD were 50% for a fetal weight of 3.70 kg. CONCLUSION: In settings similar to those in Ghana, women who have undergone a previous CD whose fetuses weigh more than 3.70 kg are likely to have less than a 50% chance of having a successful vaginal delivery.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists

OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologists' current practice patterns and opinions regarding vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC). STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 1,200 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) fellows in July 2003. Information was gathered on percentage of cesarean and VBAC deliveries performed, factors influencing changes in these rates in the past 5 years, hospital protocol regarding VBAC and factors influencing the recommendation of VBAC. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of questionnaires were returned to ACOG after 3 mailings. Approximately 49% of respondents reported that they were performing more cesarean deliveries than they were 5 years earlier. The primary reasons for this increase were the risk of liability and patient preference for delivery method. More than 25% of physicians reported that they practiced in hospitals that do not follow the ACOG guidelines with respect to resources and immediate availability. Almost all (98.2%) respondents agreed that they knew the risks and benefits of VBAC. However, only 61% reported feeling competent in determining which patients will have a successful VBAC. CONCLUSION: Obstetrician-gynecologists seem to be aware of the risks and benefits of VBAC; however, there is some doubt as to who should be offered a trial of labor and what predicts a successful VBAC.     

剖宫产后再次阴道分娩

随着医疗水平的提高和社会各方面的因素,剖宫产率呈现逐年增高的趋势,剖宫产后再次妊娠的分娩方式,尚存争议。本文综合分析剖宫产后再次妊娠阴道分娩(vaginal birth after cesarean,VBAC)的发展趋势、病例选择及相关处理方法,以进一步降低剖宫产率,提高产科质量。     

Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: Weight-based outcomes

OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to compare infectious morbidity and trial of labor (TOL) success stratified by weight in women. STUDY DESIGN: Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) candidates were divided into groups based on prepregnancy weight: group I, 70 (<200 pounds); group II, 70 (200-300 pounds); and group III, 69 (>300 pounds). RESULTS: The TOL success rate was 81.8% in group I compared with 57.1% in group II and 13.3% in group III (P =.001). The overall infectious morbidity was significantly greater in the obese women 39% (P =.001) compared with the average women at 11.4% and the lean women at 5.7%. CONCLUSION: Infectious morbidity is increased and VBAC success is reduced in patients who weigh more than 300 pounds.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean in California

OBJECTIVE: To estimate rates at which women were offered and consented to trial of labor in California hospitals with high and low risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates. METHODS: From 267 nonfederal acute-care hospitals in California that performed more than 678 deliveries in 1992-1993, 51 hospitals were selected in a stratified sample. Hospitals in the sample were categorized as having high, medium, and low risk-adjusted cesarean rates using a logistic regression model based on data from the California Patient Discharge Data System. We reviewed medical records of women with previous cesareans for evidence of counseling regarding trial of labor, other clinical variables, and method of delivery. Differences in proportions between the three groups of hospitals were compared. RESULTS: According to records of 369 women with previous cesareans, after excluding contraindications, 312 were potentially eligible for trial of labor. Hospitals with low risk-adjusted cesarean rates documented counseling women for trial of labor in over 99% of records reviewed, compared with 85% and 79%, respectively, of hospitals with intermediate and high rates (P <.001). Rates of completed vaginal births after cesarean were 71% in hospitals with low risk-adjusted cesarean rates, compared with 39% and 31% in hospitals with intermediate and high rates (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: California hospitals with high cesarean rates in 1992-1993 had markedly higher rates of repeat elective cesarean delivery without evidence of counseling regarding trial of labor. Informed patient choice is a critical element of the decision for trial of labor or elective repeat cesarean, and lack of documented counseling is cause for concern.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an historic cohort cost analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed an historic cohort analysis of women with a single prior cesarean delivery who were delivered at our institution during 1999. Inclusion criteria were > or =36 weeks' gestation and carrying a live, singleton fetus with no antenatally diagnosed anomalies. The primary outcome variable was mean cost of hospital care for mother-infant pairs, as obtained from the hospital's Clinical Resources Department. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 204 mother-infant pairs, 65 in the elective repeat cesarean group and 139 in the attempted vaginal birth group. Mean cost of care was higher for mothers ($4155 vs $3675;P <.001), neonates ($1794 vs $1187; P =.03), and mother-infant pairs ($5949 vs $4863; P =.001) for the elective repeat cesarean group compared with the attempted vaginal delivery group. CONCLUSION: In women with a single prior cesarean delivery, a trial of labor is more cost-effective than an elective repeat cesarean delivery.     

Vaginal delivery after cesarean section

We retrospectively analyzed 194 pregnancies in women with a history of previous cesarean section (CS) who were offered a trial of labor. We offered every woman a trial of labor as long as she did not have a known previous classical scar. One hundred fifty-one women delivered vaginally (79%), 24 women had multiple uterine scars. Multiple gestations and breech presentation were not considered a sole indication to perform CS. Fetal and maternal morbidity are presented. We conclude that women with multiple previous CS scars can safely deliver vaginally as can women with unknown uterine scars, with careful intrapartum surveillance. Although our numbers of women with breech presentation and multiple gestations are small, in the absence of significant morbidity, we continue to allow these women to labor and deliver vaginally.     

Vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery for arrest of descent*

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) success rates for patients with a prior cesarean delivery (CD) for arrest of descent, as well as determine any predictors for success.

Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients delivered by a single MFM practice from 2005 to 2017 with a singleton pregnancy and one prior CD for arrest of descent. We estimated the rate and associated risk factors for successful VBAC.

Results: We included 208 patients with one prior CD for arrest of descent, 100 (48.1%) of whom attempted a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) with a VBAC success rate was 84/100 (84%, 95% CI 76–90%). Among the women who attempted TOLAC, women with a prior vaginal delivery >24 weeks’ had a significantly higher VBAC success rate (91.8% versus 71.8%, p?=?.01). Maternal age, body mass index, estimated fetal weight, induction of labor, and cervical dilation were not associated with a higher VBAC success rate.

Conclusions: For women with a prior CD for arrest of descent, VBAC success rates are high. This suggests that arrest of descent is mostly dependent on factors unique to each pregnancy and not due to an inadequate pelvis or recurring conditions. Women with a prior CD for arrest of descent should not be discouraged from attempting TOLAC in a subsequent pregnancy due to concerns about the likelihood of success.