Measurement of levetiracetam drug levels to assist with seizure control and monitoring of drug interactions with other anti-epileptic medications (AEMs)

PurposeLevetiracetam (LEV) therapeutic range (20–40 mg/L) and potential drug interactions were assessed in people with epilepsy (PWE).MethodFifty-two PWE had LEV and concomitant medications [carbamazepine (CBZ); valproate (VPA); lamotrigine (LTG)] blood levels measured and compared to seizure activity. Lacosamide (LCM) levels were unavailable. Adopted therapeutic ranges were: 20–40 mg/L – LEV; 25–50 μmol/L – total CBZ; 6–13 μmol/L – free CBZ; 300–750 μmol/L – total VPA; 30–75 μmol/L – free VPA; and 40–60 μmol/L – LTG. Seizure-freedom was assessed and patients followed for almost two years.Results23 of 52 PWE (44%) used LEV monotherapy and 16/23 (70%) had ‘therapeutic’ LEV with 13/16 (81%) seizure-free. 29 of 52 (56%) used polytherapy and 16/29 (55%) had ‘therapeutic’ LEV with 7/16 (44%) seizure-free. 11 of 29 (38%) used CBZ: 4/11 (36%) had therapeutic mean LEV levels and 7/11 (64%) were seizure-free. Fourteen (48%) used VPA: 9/14 (64%) had therapeutic mean LEV levels and 8/14 (57%) were seizure-free. 13 of 29 (45%) used LTG: 8/13 (62%) had therapeutic mean LEV levels and 5/13 (38%) were seizure-free. LEV did not alter CBZ, but CBZ affected LEV. LEV elevated VPA free levels but not VPA total levels. Dosage/concentration was lowered with polytherapy.ConclusionLEV range (20–40 mg/L) assisted epilepsy management and anti-epileptic medication interactions were suggested with polytherapy thus possibly explaining the impaired efficacy of LEV with polytherapy.     

Lacosamide as add-on in brain tumor-related epilepsy: preliminary report on efficacy and tolerability

Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) that has demonstrated a good efficacy in controlling seizures as an add-on in adult epilepsy. To date, there have been no studies on LCM in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE). To evaluate efficacy and tolerability of LCM as an add-on in BTRE, we followed 14 patients suffering from BTRE who had already been treated with other AEDs and who had not experienced adequate seizure control. Eleven patients underwent chemotherapy while being treated with LCM. Mean duration of follow up was 5.4 months (min < 1 max 10 months). Mean seizure number in the last month prior to the introduction of LCM had been 15.4. At last follow-up, the mean seizure number was reduced to 1.9/month. Lacosamide mean dosage was of 332.1 mg/day (min 100 max 400 mg/day). Responder rate was 78.6%. One patient discontinued LCM because of side-effects. There were no other reported side-effects. Preliminary data on the use of LCM in add-on in patients with BTRE indicate that this drug may represent a valid alternative as an add-on in this particular patient population. However, larger samples are necessary in order to draw definitive conclusions.     

Clinical management of elderly patients with epilepsy; the use of lacosamide in a single center setting

IntroductionLacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED) for which there is limited experience in the treatment of elderly patients with epilepsy. This study was performed to evaluate the use of LCM in this particular patient group, focusing on its tolerability and effectiveness. This is a retrospective, single-center study, in patients over 60 years old treated with LCM between 1/2010 and 5/2015. Altogether, 233 elderly patients receiving LCM were identified; of these, 67 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, i.e., LCM administered for at least 2 weeks.ResultsLacosamide was initiated for acute seizure disorders (prolonged complex partial seizures, recurrent seizures, or status epilepticus) in 54 patients (81%) and for chronic epilepsy in 13 patients in an outpatient setting. The mean follow-up period for LCM treatment was 14 months. The mean daily dose of LCM at the end of follow-up was 368 mg (range: 100–600) for those 57 patients that continued treatment. Ten patients (15%) stopped LCM treatment but none because of lack of efficacy and only three patients (4%) because of side effects. The most frequent side effects were dizziness, fatigue, and tremor.ConclusionsLacosamide was well tolerated even at relatively high doses and in combination therapy.     

Prospective audits with newer antiepileptic drugs in focal epilepsy: Insights into population responses?

Despite the availability of a wide range of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), there is little evidence that their introduction has substantially altered outcomes. This paper reviews data from 5 consecutive prospective audits with new AEDs using similar methodology. Prospective audits with topiramate (TPM; n = 135), levetiracetam (LEV; n = 136), zonisamide (ZNS; n = 141), pregabalin (PGB; n = 135), and lacosamide (LCM; n = 160) were undertaken in treated patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Follow-up continued until one of four endpoints was reached: seizure freedom for ≥ 6 months on unchanged dosing; ≥ 50% reduction (responder) in seizure frequency on the highest tolerated dose compared with baseline; < 50% seizure frequency reduction (marginal response) compared with baseline in patients wishing to continue treatment with the new AED; or withdrawal due to lack of efficacy, side effects, or both. A greater proportion of seizure-free patients occurred with LEV (23.5%), LCM (21.9%), and TPM (20.7%) than with ZNS (12.8%) and PGB (10.4%). A higher percentage discontinued treatment with ZNS (41.8%) and PGB (50.4%) than with LEV (32.4%), TPM (31.1%), and LCM (22.5%). Most seizure-free patients responded to the new agent as first or second add-on (TPM 96%; LEV 97%; ZNS 89%; PGB 86%; LCM 97%) often at modest or moderate dosing (TPM 68%, ≤ 200 mg/day; LEV 63%, ≤ 1000 mg/day; ZNS 61%, ≤ 100 mg/day; PGB 86%, ≤ 300 mg/day; LCM 74%, ≤ 200 mg/day). With < 10% of patients discontinuing all AEDs due to lack of efficacy, tolerability was the major factor influencing the number of patients remaining on treatment. Lacosamide was the best (77% patients continued treatment), while PGB was the worst (50% continued treatment) tolerated AED. Overall, seizure freedom was achieved in < 25% of patients in each audit, mainly as a first or second add-on, with best tolerated AEDs producing a higher number of good outcomes. Seizures in very few patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy task force, responded to any of the 5 newer AEDs. These data support the suggestion that the introduction of modern agents has not importantly impacted the outcomes in refractory epilepsy.     

Lacosamide in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: An observational multicentric open-label study

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) both as add-on therapy and monotherapy in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) based on an observational, prospective, multicenter study.MethodsWe enrolled 100 patients (mean age: 43.4 ± 12.53 years, 57 females) with nonlesional TLE and TLE with hippocampal sclerosis (HS) that did not respond to the first drug and who were referred to epilepsy centers of the University of Catanzaro, University of Palermo, IRCSS Neuromed of Pozzilli, and Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg. In this open-label, multicenter trial, patients were initiated on oral LCM as add-on therapy to first AED monotherapy or as a later add-on to two concomitant AEDs. Seizure frequency changes and adverse events were recorded for at least six months after LCM was added.ResultsFourteen patients dropped out because of positive MRI findings other than HS. Patients received LCM at 200–400 mg/day. Fifty-eight out of these 86 patients with seizures that were previously drug-resistant had reduced seizure frequency after introduction of LCM. Forty-five out of 86 patients were classified as responders (12 were seizure-free, 33 achieved a reduction > 50%). Interestingly, five patients out of 86 achieved seizure freedom for at least one year and progressively switched to monotherapy with LCM, and all five remained seizure-free at follow-up (6–48 months).ConclusionsOur results may suggest that LCM at doses of 200 to 400 mg/day reduces seizure frequency in adults with TLE regardless of the presence of HS, and that it may be considered as a first add-on treatment for patients with pharmacoresistant TLE.     

Levetiracetam in the treatment of neonatal seizures: A pilot study

PurposeAt present, neonatal seizures are usually treated with Phenobarbital (PB) despite the limited efficacy and the potential risk this treatment holds for the developing brain. We report here a prospective pilot feasibility study on the use of Levetiracetam as monotherapy in the treatment of neonatal seizures.MethodsSix newborns (body weight > 2000 g, gestational age > 30 weeks) presenting with neonatal seizures were enrolled. Patients whose seizures were caused by electrolyte disturbances or hypoglycemia, or whose seizures did respond to pyridoxine were excluded. Patients previously treated with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), with the exception of single PB doses before and during titration, were excluded. LEV was administered orally, increasing the dose by 10 mg/(kg day) over 3 days. Endpoint was the need of any additional AEDs (or PB) after day 3, or 3 months of LEV treatment. A decision regarding further treatment was made on an individual basis and follow-up was documented up to 8 months of age.ResultsNo severe adverse effects were observed. Mild sedation was reported in one infant. All six patients treated with oral LEV became seizure free within 6 days. Five patients remained seizure free after 3 months with ongoing LEV monotherapy. One infant developed pharmacoresistent epilepsy. Seizures relapsed later in the clinical course of two more patients, one of whom was no longer under LEV therapy.DiscussionResults from our small patient group indicate that LEV may be an alternative therapeutic option in neonatal seizures.     

Self-reported aggressiveness during treatment with levetiracetam correlates with depression

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to identify clinical correlates of self-reported aggressiveness (SRA) in patients with epilepsy treated with levetiracetam (LEV) with special reference to the role of depression.MethodsA consecutive sample of adult outpatients with epilepsy was assessed with the Neurological Disorder Depression Inventory for Epilepsy, the Adverse Event Profile (AEP), and the Emotional Thermometer.ResultsFrom a total sample of 163 consecutive patients treated with LEV, SRA at any level (from rarely a problem to always) was associated with a 7-fold increased risk of being depressed (95% CI: 3.0–17.5; p < 0.001). Self-reported aggressiveness was reported as “always” a problem by 9.8% of the patients. In these patients, apart from depression, SRA was associated with high AEP total scores (55.1 vs. 39.3; p < 0.001) and polytherapy (43.8% vs. 19.8%; p = 0.034). Anxiety scores were not elevated (4.9 vs. 3.6; p = 0.183).ConclusionsSelf-reported aggressiveness during treatment with LEV is not an isolated symptom but is associated with depressed mood. Anxiety-mediated mechanisms do not seem to be involved.     

NEOPLASM study: Real-life use of lacosamide in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy

BackgroundThe choice of antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is complicated, and there are a lack of robust clinical trial data to date.MethodsThe NEOPLASM (Neuroncologic Patients treated with LAcoSaMide) study was a 6-month, multicenter, retrospective, observational study in patients with BTRE treated with lacosamide. Patients were started on lacosamide because of a lack of efficacy or adverse events (AEs) with prior AEDs or suitability versus other AEDs, according to clinical practice. The primary efficacy variable was the seizure-free rate at 6 months. Safety variables included the proportion of patients with an AE and the proportion with an AE that led to discontinuation.ResultsOverall, 105 patients from 14 hospital centers were included in the analysis. Treatment with lacosamide for 6 months resulted in a 30.8% seizure-free rate, and 66.3% of patients had a ≥ 50% seizure reduction (responders). In the subset of patients included because of a lack of efficacy with prior AEDs, seizure-free rates were 28.0%, and 66.7% of patients were responders. No statistically significant differences in efficacy were observed according to the mechanism of action or enzyme-inducing properties of concomitant AEDs. Adverse events were reported by 41.9% of patients at 6 months, and 4.7% of them led to discontinuation. The most common AEs were somnolence/fatigue and dizziness. Notably, 57.1% of the patients who were switched to lacosamide because of AEs with their previous therapy did not report any AE at 6-month follow-up.ConclusionsIn this open-label, observational study, lacosamide appeared to be effective and well tolerated in a large population of patients with BTRE. Lacosamide may therefore be a promising option for the treatment of patients with BTRE.     

The longer-term cognitive effects of adjunctive antiepileptic treatment with lacosamide in comparison with lamotrigine and topiramate in a naturalistic outpatient setting

In this retrospective controlled study, the impact of adjunctive lacosamide (LCM) on cognition in patients with epilepsy was evaluated and compared with that of topiramate (TPM) and lamotrigine (LTG) in a naturalistic outpatient setting. Cognition was investigated by means of objective assessment of executive functions (EpiTrack®) and verbal memory and by subjective ratings of self-perceived side effects (cognition, mood, and vegetative). Quality of life was assessed using the QOLIE-10 questionnaire. Patients underwent assessment at baseline and after a median follow-up interval of 32 weeks. Forty-four patients were treated with LCM, 11 with LTG, and 15 with TPM. Treatment arms differed with regard to the age at onset of epilepsy (LTG > TPM) and to seizure control from baseline to follow-up, which was best in patients whose seizures were treated with LTG (55% vs. 16% in patients whose seizures were treated with LCM and 13% in patients whose seizures were treated with TPM). Groups did not differ in the type of epilepsy, daily drug load or drug load change, nor in baseline seizure frequency. Repeated measures statistics controlling for epilepsy onset and seizure outcome showed deteriorated executive functions with TPM (F = 7.5, p = 0.001). On an individual level (reliable change indices), 53% of the patients whose seizures were treated with TPM showed losses in this domain (LCM 14%, LTG 27%) and none of the patients showed improvement (LCM 23%, LTG 27%; χ² = 11.8, p = 0.019). No differences in memory, quality of life, or mood were noted among patients in the three treatment arms. Subjective cognitive complaints increased in 5 of the 9 patients whose seizures were treated with TPM (LCM 1/9, LTG 0/9; χ² = 11.9, p = 0.025). The findings of this study demonstrate for the first time that the cognitive side effect profile of LCM is comparable to that of LTG and superior to that of TPM. This is indicated by both subjective and objective measures. Given the naturalistic setting and the retrospective nature of the study, a follow-up prospective, randomized trial with larger sample sizes is required to confirm these findings.     

The effect of levetiracetam on status epilepticus-induced neuronal death in the rat hippocampus

PurposeLevetiracetam has been reported to be well tolerated and effective in status epilepticus (SE) refractory to benzodiazepine. Because of little preclinical or clinical data concerning the outcomes of LEV in SE-induced neuronal death and vasogenic edema, we investigated the effect of LEV on SE-induced injury in comparison to diazepam (DZP), and valproate (VPA).MethodsTwo hours after pilocarpine-induced SE, rats were given one of the following drugs; (1) DZP, (2) LEV, (3) VPA, (4) DZP + LEV, (5) DZP + VPA, and (6) DZP + oxiracetam. Three–four days after SE, neuronal damage and vasogenic edema were evaluated by Fluoro-Jade B (FJB) staining and serum-protein extravasation, respectively.ResultsLEV (≥50 mg/kg) was effective to protect neuronal damage from SE in comparison to DZP and VPA. LEV as an add-on drug with DZP could not alleviate neuronal damage as compared to LEV alone. VPA (≥100 mg/kg) was effective to protect neuronal damage from SE, as compared to DZP. VPA as an add-on drug with DZP reduced neuronal damage, as compared to DZP alone.ConclusionThese findings suggest that LEV may negatively interact with DZP, and be more effective to prevent SE-induced neuronal death as a first line drug than as a second line therapy after BDZ treatment.     

Efficacy of intravenous lacosamide as an add-on treatment in refractory status epilepticus: A multicentric prospective study

ObjectiveTreatment of status epilepticus (SE) has not changed in the last few decades, benzodiazepines plus phenytoin or valproate being the most common treatment. Once this first and second line treatment has failed SE is considered refractory (RSE). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous (iv) lacosamide (LCM) in RSE.MethodPatients with RSE who were treated with ivLCM in six Spanish centers were prospectively included. Efficacy was defined as cessation of seizures after starting ivLCM, with no need for any further antiepileptic drug. All patients had been unsuccessfully treated following the standard protocol (benzodiazepines plus phenytoin or valproate) before ivLCM was added.ResultsThirty-four patients were included, 52.9% men, with mean age of 60.15 years. In 58.9% of patients the etiology was symptomatic, and the most common type of SE was focal convulsive (82.4%). Mean initial bolus dose of LCM was 323.53 mg. ivLCM was effective in more than half of patients (64.7%), with termination of SE before 12 h in 50% of them. ivLCM was used as a fourth or later option in 76.5% of patients. No serious adverse events attributable to LCM were reported.ConclusionsLCM might be a fast, effective and safe add-on treatment in RSE.     

Levetiracetam efficacy in children with epilepsy with electrical status epilepticus in sleep

PurposeEpilepsy with electrical status epilepticus in sleep (ESES) is a devastating disease, and we sought to evaluate the efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) for the treatment of patients with this epileptic encephalopathy in China.MethodsClinical data from all patients with ESES who received LEV therapy at our pediatric neurology outpatient clinic between 2007 and 2014 (n = 71) were retrospectively analyzed. The LEV dosage was 30–50 mg/kg/day. Electroencephalography recordings and neuropsychological evaluations were performed repeatedly for 3–75 months after the start of LEV therapy.ResultsThirty-five (70%) of 50 patients who had seizures at the start of LEV therapy had a > 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Positive response on EEG was found during the first 3–4 months of LEV therapy in 32 (45%) of 71 patients, with normalization of EEG in 5 patients. Relapse occurred in 8 (25%) of the initial electrical responders. Hence, 47 patients (66%) still suffered from ESES and only 13 patients regained their baseline level of function at the last follow-up. The response to LEV was significantly associated with ESES duration, age at onset of ESES, and etiology of epilepsy. Although fatigue and anorexia were the primary adverse events, LEV was well-tolerated by all patients.ConclusionsLevetiracetam is safe and may be efficient when used to treat ESES syndrome; however, the efficacy EEG neuropsychological outcomes is limited on the whole.     

Loss of the initial efficacy of levetiracetam in patients with refractory epilepsy

PurposeThe efficacy and safety of the anti-convulsive drug levetiracetam (LEV) has been well documented but few clinical studies have investigated tolerance to LEV. The aim of this study was to evaluate the loss of the initial efficacy of LEV in adult patients with refractory partial-onset seizures.MethodsWe enrolled patients with refractory partial epilepsy who were started on add-on LEV treatment. The efficacy of LEV was evaluated every three months and the seizure frequency was decided by the average number of monthly seizures. A responder was defined as a patient with a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency from the baseline. Seizure freedom was defined as a seizure-free status from the beginning of LEV treatment to the evaluation period. Loss of the initial efficacy was defined as a shift from responder status during the first three months of LEV treatment to non-responder status during the follow-up period.ResultsA total of 95 epilepsy patients were analyzed. During the first three months of LEV treatment, 50 (52.6%) of the 95 patients were responders with a ≥50% seizure reduction. Nine patients (18.0%) showed a loss of initial efficacy during the second three-month period. In contrast, only two (4.0%) of the non-responders during the first three months became responders during the next three months. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.054). Based on Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, 49.2% of the patients who initially responded to LEV treatment during the first three months were predicted to lose this response at 42 months. Loss of the initial efficacy of LEV treatment occurred mostly within 18 months.ConclusionThis study suggests that the occurrence of tolerance is more common than late gain of efficacy of treatment although larger prospective studies would have to be carried out to prove this observation.     

Evaluation of levetiracetam and valproic acid as low-dose monotherapies for children with typical benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS)

PurposeThis study aimed to compare the monotherapeutic efficacies of levetiracetam (LEV) and valproic acid (VPA) in a cohort of newly diagnosed children with typical benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS).MethodsA total of 56 children with typical BECTS were retrospectively reviewed in the analyses. Thirty-three children received LEV and 23 received VPA as initial monotherapy, and the treatments lasted for at least 18 months.ResultsThe average dosage of LEV was 22.7 ± 4.7 mg/kg/day, and that of VPA was 18.7 ± 5.7 mg/kg/day. The seizure-freedom rates were not significantly different between the two groups at 6 (57.5% vs. 60.9%), 12 (81.8% vs. 73.9%) or 18 months (100% vs. 100%). However, a greater number of the children taking VPA achieved Electroencephalography (EEG) normalization compared to those taking LEV both at 12 (78.3% vs. 45.5%) and 18 months (95.7% vs. 72.7%; p < 0.05). No children discontinued therapy due to adverse effects during the follow-up. Only one child (4.7%) in the VPA group exhibited mild weight gain (BMI increase of 2 at the end of follow-up) but did not withdraw from treatment.ConclusionLow-dosage VPA and LEV monotherapies are equally effective in controlling seizures, but VPA exhibited better efficacy than LEV in improving the electrophysiological abnormalities of children with BECTS. None of the patients discontinued therapy, which was likely due to the administration of low dosages.     

Quality of life and employment status are correlated with antiepileptic monotherapy versus polytherapy and not with use of “newer” versus “classic” drugs: Results of the “Compliant 2006” survey in 907 patients

“Classic” and “newer” antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were compared in an epidemiological survey regarding patient's acceptance of AEDs, quality of life (QoL), and employment. Data from 907 outpatients, 45.9% female (mean age: 44.8 ± 17.9 years), were evaluated by 90 neurologists in private practices, who were also involved in a non-interventional study by Sanofi–Aventis Deutschland GmbH, regarding medication, seizure type, illness duration, employment, patients’ acceptance of AEDs (4-point scale where 1 = very good), and QoL (6-point scale where 1 = very good). Among the patients, 69.7% were on monotherapy, 25.4% were taking two AEDs, and 4.9% were taking more than two AEDs. Patient's acceptance of AEDs (mean ± SD = 1.65 ± 0.62) and QoL (2.34 ± 0.89) were “good.” Among patients aged 18–65 years, 68.6% were employed. QoL and acceptance were lower with polytherapy. Older age and polytherapy were associated with lower probability of employment. No differences emerged between “classic” and “newer” AED monotherapy. Polytherapy-associated lower QoL could be due to severity of illness or adverse effects of treatment.     

Effects of levetiracetam on seizure frequency and neuropsychological impairments in children with refractory epilepsy with secondary bilateral synchrony

PurposeIn epilepsy with continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep (CSWS), which is a representative epileptic syndrome of secondary bilateral synchrony (SBS), the urgent suppression of this electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormality may be necessary to prevent the progression of neuropsychological impairments. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) on SBS, seizure frequency, and neuropsychological impairments in children with refractory epilepsy.MethodsEleven (seven male and four female) patients with refractory epilepsy with SBS on EEG, aged between 4.7 years and 11.3 years, were included in this study. After a 3-month baseline period, the patients were given LEV at an initial dose of 10 mg/kg/day for the first week, followed at increments of 5 mg/kg/day every week, up to 20 mg/kg/day. The LEV dose was then adjusted up to a maximum of 60 mg/kg/day, according to the clinician's judgment. EEG recordings and clinical evaluations were performed every 3 months, focusing on SBS. The occurrence of SBS was then scored, and the relationship between the score and the response to LEV treatment was evaluated. In comparison with the baseline SBS frequency, the EEG response to LEV treatment was classified, and responders were identified as having a ≥50% reduction in SBS frequency. In addition, in comparison with the baseline seizure frequency, response to LEV treatment was classified. Responders were identified as patients with complete cessation (100% seizure control) and a response of ≥50% reduction in seizures. Furthermore, neuropsychological impairments such as hyperactivity, impulsiveness, and inattention were evaluated before and after LEV treatment.ResultsEight patients (72.7%) were considered responders. In addition, all eight patients were also considered responders for clinical seizures. Furthermore, 7 of 8 (87.5%) patients with response showed decreased hyperactivity and impulsivity after LEV administration.ConclusionsThe present data clearly indicate the usefulness of LEV in reducing both SBS on EEG and seizure frequency. LEV represents an important addition to the treatments available for refractory childhood epilepsies with SBS on EEG.     

Effects of lacosamide and carbamazepine on human motor cortex excitability: A double-blind,placebo-controlled transcranial magnetic stimulation study

PurposeLacosamide (LCM) and carbamazepine (CBZ) are antiepileptic drugs both acting on neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels. Patch-clamp studies demonstrated significant differences in how LCM and CBZ affect neuronal membrane excitability. Despite valuable information patch-clamp studies provide, they also comprise some constraints. For example, little is known about effects of LCM on intracortical synaptic excitability. In contrast, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can describe drug-induced changes at the system level of the human cerebral cortex.MethodsThe present study was designed to explore dose-depended effects of LCM and effects of CBZ on motor cortex excitability with TMS in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in healthy human subjects. Subjects received 600 mg CBZ, 200 mg LCM, 400 mg LCM or placebo preceding TMS measurements.ResultsCompared to placebo, TMS motor thresholds were significantly increased after carbamazepine and lacosamide, with a trend for a dose dependent effect of lacosamide. Both, carbamazepine and lacosamide did not affect TMS parameters of intracortical synaptic excitability.ConclusionsTMS measurements suggest that lacosamide and carbamazepine predominantly act on neuronal membrane excitability.     

Distinguishing between patients with pure psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and those with comorbid epilepsy by means of clinical data

Patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs) often have additional epileptic seizures (ESs). Distinguishing between those with ESs and those without ESs is difficult but mandatory. We hypothesize that these two patient groups differ in clinical data, which might be useful for establishing diagnosis. All patients with PNESs (n = 114) from the Bethel Epilepsy Centre treated between 1/11/2010 and 1/11/2011 were included. Thirty-six percent had additional epilepsy. In contrast, 84 of the 114 patients with PNESs took antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (AED treatment: patients with PNESs = 44/73, patients with PNESs + ESs = 40/41), most of them (65.5%) as polytherapy. Significant differences between both groups were as follows: patients with PNESs were older at disease onset, had a shorter duration from onset to inpatient visit, were less frequently on AEDs, were less frequently on antiepileptic polytherapy, and had a normal EEG compared with patients with PNESs + ESs. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression revealed age at seizure onset, number of AEDs, and difference between number of AEDs and psychiatric drugs as significant predictors of patients with ESs in PNESs (Nagelkerke's r² = 0.59). Therefore, clinical data proved to be useful in the diagnostic process.     

The effects of lacosamide on cognition,quality-of-life measures,and quality of life in patients with refractory partial epilepsy

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine cognitive and quality-of-life measures/quality of life outcomes with adjunctive lacosamide therapy in patients with treatment-resistant partial epilepsy.MethodsThis was a prospective, open-label, nonblinded, adjunctive therapy test–retest (within subjects) study of patients with treatment-resistant partial epilepsy in which outcome (cognitive functioning and mood/quality of life) was measured in the same subject before and after adjunctive lacosamide administration for 24 weeks. The cognitive assessment included the following: Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Buschke Selective Reminding Test, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test—Revised, Stroop Color Word Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Digit Span, Digit Cancellation, and Trails A and B. The quality-of-life measures/quality-of-life assessment included the following: Beck Depression Inventory—II, Profile of Mood States, and Quality of Life Inventory—89. Lacosamide was started at 100 mg (50 mg twice daily) and could be titrated as needed up to 400 mg/day (200 mg twice daily). Baseline concomitant AEDs were kept constant. Composite scores were calculated for a pre–post difference score for the cognitive and mood/quality-of-life measures separately and used in regression analyses to correct for the effects of age, education, seizure frequency, seizure severity, dose of lacosamide, and number of AEDs at baseline.ResultsThirty-four patients were enrolled (13 males, 21 females). Mean age was 38.8 ± 2.43 years. Mean seizure frequency decreased significantly from 2.0 ± 2.55 seizures per week at baseline to 1.02 ± 1.72 seizures per week at posttreatment (t = 4.59, p < .0001) with a 50% responder rate seen in 18 patients (52.9%). No significant differences were found on the composite scores of the cognitive or the mood/quality-of-life measures after 6 months of lacosamide.SignificanceLacosamide appeared to have low risks of significant changes in cognition or mood/quality of life. In addition, the present study supports prior studies that have proven lacosamide as an effective adjunctive therapy for the treatment of resistant partial epilepsy.     

Randomized double-blind comparison of cognitive and EEG effects of lacosamide and carbamazepine

Differential effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is more commonly determined by tolerability than efficacy. Cognitive effects of AEDs can adversely affect tolerability and quality of life. This study evaluated cognitive and EEG effects of lacosamide (LCM) compared with carbamazepine immediate-release (CBZ-IR). A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-period crossover, fixed-dose study in healthy subjects compared neuropsychological and EEG effects of LCM (150 mg, b.i.d.) and CBZ-IR (200 mg, t.i.d.). Testing was conducted at screening, predrug baseline, the end of each treatment period (3-week titration; 3-week maintenance), and the end of each washout period (4 weeks after treatment). A composite Z-score was derived for the primary outcome variable (computerized cognitive tests and traditional neuropsychological measures) and separately for the EEG measures. Other variables included individual computer, neuropsychological, and EEG scores and adverse events (AEs). Subjects included 60 healthy adults (57% female; mean age: 34.4 years [SD: 10.5]); 44 completed both treatments; 41 were per protocol subjects. Carbamazepine immediate-release had worse scores compared with LCM for the primary composite neuropsychological outcome (mean difference = 0.33 [SD: 1.36], p = 0.011) and for the composite EEG score (mean difference = 0.92 [SD: 1.77], p = 0.003). Secondary analyses across the individual variables revealed that CBZ-IR was statistically worse than LCM on 36% (4/11) of the neuropsychological tests (computerized and noncomputerized) and 0% of the four EEG measures; none favored CBZ-IR. Drug-related AEs occurred more with CBZ-IR (49%) than LCM (22%). Lacosamide had fewer untoward neuropsychological and EEG effects and fewer AEs and AE-related discontinuations than CBZ-IR in healthy subjects. Lacosamide exhibits a favorable cognitive profile.