Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children before school age: experience of a Pakistani centre

OBJECTIVE: To review our experience of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in children before school age, and determine its efficacy and safety in this age group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of children aged < or = 5 years undergoing PCNL were reviewed. Variables assessed included stone number, size, location and type. The PCNL puncture site and number were also recorded. We reviewed stone clearance with PCNL, ancillary procedures used, complication rates and follow-up status of the children. RESULTS: There were 30 renal units in 29 children (median age 3.8 years, range 1.4-5). Because of poor growth the mean (SD) body weight of the children was only 12.2 (2.8) kg, which is near the 50th percentile for children of mean age 3.5 years. The median (range) stone burden was 2.35 (1.3-6) cm; 60% of the patients had single stones while 28% had more than five. There were five staghorn stones. All PCNL was primary and with one puncture, using a 17 F angled nephroscope; stones were fragmented using a pneumatic lithoclast. After PCNL stones were completely cleared in 60% of the renal units, which increased to 100% after combining it with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. The median (range) follow-up was 24.9 (4-51) months; the overall complication rate was 6%. In the long follow-up hypertension was not detected in any child and isotopic renograms in 17 kidneys detected no new scarring or loss of renal function. CONCLUSION: PCNL is a safe and effective for treating renal stones in very young children.     

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of paediatric urolithiasis

INTRODUCTION

Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has revolutionised the treatment of paediatric nephrolithiasis. Paediatric PCNL has been performed using both adult and paediatric instruments. Stone clearance rates and complications vary according to the technique used and surgeon experience. We present our experience with PCNL using adult instruments and a 28Fr access tract for large renal calculi in children under 18 years.

METHODS

All patients undergoing PCNL at our institution between 2000 and 2009 were reviewed. Demographics, surgical details and post-operative follow-up information were obtained to identify stone clearance rates and complications.

RESULTS

PCNL was performed in 32 renal units in 31 patients (mean age: 10.8 years). The mean stone diameter was 19mm (range: 5–40mm). Twenty-six cases required single puncture and six required multiple tracts. Overall, 11 staghorn stones, 10 multiple calyceal stones and 11 single stones were treated. Twenty-seven patients (84%) were completely stone free following initial PCNL. Two cases had extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for residual fragments, giving an overall stone free rate of 91% following treatment. There was no significant bleeding or sepsis encountered either during the operation or in the post-operative setting. No patient required or received a blood transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Paediatric PCNL can be performed safely with minimal morbidity using adult instruments for large stone burden, enabling rapid and complete stone clearance.     

Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children

In the paediatric section, two papers relating to the upper urinary tract are presented. The first, from Hungary, describes simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 13 patients, where it was deemed feasible; this is the first such report. Authors from London report on unilateral nephrectomy in patients with nephrogenic hypertension, and found that it was successful in normalising blood pressure in patients with renal hypertension with a normal contralateral kidney. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of removing bilateral kidney stones simultaneously from children, in one session. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients (three girls and 10 boys, 26 kidneys; mean age 8 years, range 3-14) underwent simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the same session, under general anaesthesia, starting with ureteric catheter insertion into both kidneys and using a 26 F adult nephroscope. The mean (range) stone diameter was 2 (1-3.5) cm. Three patients had staghorn stones in one of their kidneys. Ultrasonic disintegration was used; two patients had bilateral and two others unilateral endopylotomy, and one patient had percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy in the same session. The mean (range) operative duration was 65 (55-90) min. RESULTS: All patients were rendered stone-free; there was no severe bleeding or any other complication. On one side in one of the patients, a second session was needed because of residual stone. The nephrostomy tubes were removed 3 and 4 days after PCNL and the hospital stay was 6 (1-11) days. CONCLUSION: The advantages of simultaneous bilateral PCNL are reduced psychological stress, one cystoscopy and anaesthesia, less medication and a shorter hospital stay and convalescence, with considerable savings in cost. In experienced hands this method can be used not only in adults but also in children. To our knowledge this is the only report of this technique in children.     

The effect of intracalyceal distribution on the clearance of renal stones of > or = 20 mm in children after extracorporeal lithotripsy

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the intracalyceal distribution of renal stones on clearance rates after treating paediatric nephrolithiasis with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed a retrospective case series of children (aged < or = 14 years) undergoing lithotripsy on an MPL 9000 (Dornier GmbH, Germany) echo-guided lithotripter. Patients were identified using an international coding and indexing system and ESWL registry. In all, 125 children were treated during 1990-2003, but 21 had stones of > or = 20 mm. Stone clearance was assessed at 1 and 3 months, the stone-free state being defined as no radiological evidence of stone or fragments of < or = 3 mm. Failed treatments were analysed to identify any correlation with stone site. RESULTS: The overall stone-free rate was 81%; in four children the treatment failed (all girls) and subsequently they required ancillary procedures. Nineteen patients (90%) received up to three sessions of ESWL; two required four or more sessions. Of the four children in whom treatment failed, two had JJ stents; the stones were in the lower pole calyx in two, and the renal pelvis and lower pole calyx in two. The mean stone size in those where treatment failed was 25 mm, vs 21 mm in the stone-free group. The complication rate was 19%, but only one child required admission to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: ESWL is very effective for renal stones in children, with minimal morbidity. Lower pole and partial staghorn stones with a major component in the lower pole calyx should preferably be treated by a percutaneous approach.     

The management of paediatric urolithiasis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the management of paediatric urolithiasis by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), endoscopic ureterolithotomy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open nephrolithotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a 3-year period (1997-1999), 59 children were treated for urolithiasis and underwent a total of 79 procedures. Thirty-two ESWL sessions were performed in 23 children (mean age 7.4 years, median 6.0). PCNL was undertaken in 30 renal units in 25 children (mean age 6.4 years, median 4.0). Eight patients (mean age 7.8 years, median 5) underwent 17 ureteroscopic procedures, six of which involved the use of a holmium laser. Three children with staghorn calculi underwent open nephrolithotomy under conditions of renal ischaemia and hypothermia. RESULTS: Of the 23 children treated using ESWL, 21 (91%) became stone-free; 17 underwent one ESWL session (74%), three had two sessions and three (13%) had three sessions. All eight patients who underwent ureteroscopy became stone-free. Four patients in whom the stone could not be reached by ureteroscopy initially had a JJ stent inserted, and the stone and stent subsequently removed. Stones were cleared using PCNL in 27 of 30 renal units (90%); three patients who had residual stone fragments were rendered stone-free by ESWL. Two of three children undergoing open nephrolithotomy were stone-free after surgery and the remaining one rendered stone-free with ESWL. Metabolic evaluation showed that 25 of 45 children (55%) had a urinary infection, eight (18%) had hyperoxaluria, three (7%) had hypercalciuria, two (4%) had cystinuria, and no identifiable cause was found in seven (16%). Treatment by a single modality rendered 52 of the 59 children (88%) stone-free; when the different modalities were combined, 57 of 59 patients (97%) were cleared of their stones. CONCLUSIONS: Technological advances in ESWL, ureteroscopy and PCNL have had a significant effect on the management of urolithiasis in children, allowing a safe and successful outcome. The comprehensive care of children with urolithiasis should include a full metabolic evaluation. Anatomical anomalies contribute to the complexity of many cases, necessitating a close liaison between adult and paediatric urologists, nephrologists and radiologists to optimize stone management in children.     

Critical prospective appraisal of renal morphology and function in children undergoing shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on renal morphology and function in children undergoing therapy for upper-tract urolithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients less than 13 years of age with renal or upper-ureteral calculi who were found suitable for primary SWL or PCNL were evaluated for alteration of renal morphology and function after treatment. Of the 18 renal units treated, SWL and PCNL were performed in 9 units each. The average stone size was 880.2 mm2 (range 110-3800 mm2; median 660 mm2). All children underwent ultrasonic estimation of renal length and parenchymal thickness, 99m technetium dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and 99m Tc-ethylene dicystine (EDC) scintigraphy, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation prior to intervention and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Extracorporeal lithotripsy achieved complete clearance in 8 renal units (88%), requiring an average of 6333 shockwaves and an average of 2.2 sessions per renal unit. The efficiency quotient was 42. Percutaneous surgery likewise achieved complete stone clearance in 88% of renal units, with three units requiring more than one tract. Mixed calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate accounted for the majority of the stones. The mean preintervention GFR was 78.3 +/- 14.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (median 82.5 mL/min/1.73 m2; range 54-98.6 mL/min/1.73 m2), whereas the mean GFR at 3 months was 78.95 +/- 14.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (median 78.95 mL/min/1.73 m2; range 52-98 mL/min/1.73 m2). A marginal improvement of an average of 0.65 mL/min was noted. Split function EDC scans demonstrated improved drainage in five cases after intervention; the rest were unchanged. Preintervention DMSA scans revealed renal cortical scars in three children. None of the renal units had developed fresh scars at follow-up scans. None of the children developed new-onset hypertension, proteinuria, or alteration in renal size. CONCLUSION: In the present study, pediatric SWL and PCNL were not found to cause adverse renal morphologic or functional alteration. Stone clearance resulted in marginally improved function and better drainage.     

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with normal versus impaired renal function

This study aimed to compare the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with impaired renal function (IRF) and normal renal function (NRF). Records of 300 consecutive patients who underwent PCNL from July 2002 to July 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Nineteen patients (6.3%) had serum creatinine values higher than 1.5 mg/dl before surgery (IRF Group). Nineteen gender and age matched patients with normal renal function were chosen as controls (NRF Group). The surgical parameters, outcome, and complication rates were compared. The effect of PCNL on the renal function was assessed in patients with IRF. There were 13 male and 6 female patients in both groups. In the IRF group, seven patients had a solitary kidney and three had bilateral stones. Thus, PCNL was performed on 22 kidneys. No patients in the NRF Group had solitary kidney or bilateral stones and PCNL was performed on 19 kidneys. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for success and complication rates (P = 0.376 and P = 0.184, respectively). In a mean follow-up of 15.6 months, mean serum creatinine decreased from 2.8 to 2.6 mg/dl (P = 0.273) in patients of the IRF group. Similar stone clearance and complication rates were obtained with PCNL in patients with impaired and normal renal function. Surgery does not cause biochemical deterioration in patients with compromised renal function before treatment.     

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating renal calculi in children

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with the percutaneous management of renal stone disease in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical and radiological records of children up to 18 years old who were treated for renal calculi by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) at our institution between March 1995 and April 2003 were reviewed. For stone removal a special paediatric 18 F access sheath was used. RESULTS: In all, 26 PCNLs were used in 23 patients (10 boys and 13 girls, aged 1.7-16.8 years). The presenting symptoms were urinary tract infection, abdominal pain and/or haematuria. Of the 23 patients, 17 (75%) had associated metabolic disease or underlying urological anatomical abnormalities. Urinary tract infections were found in 15 patients (65%). The mean (range) stone burden was 6.0 (0.5-18.2) cm2, and the operative duration 127 (50-260) min. The primary stone-free rate was 58%, which increased to 81% after treating residual fragments. One blood transfusion was required and one patient developed urosepsis after PCNL, which was treated with antibiotics. CONCLUSION: PCNL is an effective alternative for treating renal stones in children, and is the treatment of choice for stones refractory to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.     

Comparison of 150 simultaneous bilateral and 300 unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomies

PURPOSE: To compare the results, complications, efficiency, and safety of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the results and complications of 150 SBPNs with those of 300 unilateral PCNLs. All the procedures were performed by one surgeon which provides relatively constant parameters. The success rates, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, and complications were compared on the basis of stone size and the number of nephrostomy tracks. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the results and complications of SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself did not cause more blood loss than unilateral PCNL. In both groups, the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of nephrostomy tracks. After SBPN, kidney function improved >20% in 12.2% of the patients and worsened for more than 3 days in only 4%. Temporary worsening of kidney function occurred in the unilateral procedure group as well (8%), mostly in cases of solitary kidneys or bilateral stones. The SBPN was not more hazardous than unilateral PCNL (complication rate 11.3% v 14.3%, respectively). In both groups, most of the complications were in proportion to the size and difficulties of the stones. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and advantageous procedure that is not more hazardous than the separate PCNL in cases of bilateral large stone burdens. To our knowledge, these are the largest reported series of these procedures and the only comparative analysis of SBPN and PCNL.     

Simultaneous bilateral compared with unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy

OBJECTIVE: To compare simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPCNL) and unilateral PCNL in separate sessions in patients with bilateral renal stones for several variables before and after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The results from SBPCNL carried out at two centres in different countries on 198 patients (aged 1.25-70 years) were compared with those from 300 patients undergoing unilateral PCNL in separate sessions. At one centre where extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) was available SBPCNL was used for stones where at least two sessions of ESWL would have been required on each side. Other associated procedures were also used wherever required. RESULTS: The stones were cleared bilaterally in one session of SBPCNL in 190 patients; in eight, fragments of < 3 mm remained but were not clinically significant. A second session was required in six patients on one side only. Variables assessed before and after treatment (e.g. hospital stay, analgesia requirements and complications) were not significantly different between SBPCNL and PCNL. The mean (range) total operative duration for SBPCNL was 46 (20-100) min and the hospital stay 4.3 (3-8) days. CONCLUSION: From this experience, SBPCNL is a cost-effective and beneficial solution for selected patients, with clear advantages over separate unilateral PCNL in patients with bilateral stones.     

超声联合气压弹道碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石(附78例报道)

目的:探讨经皮肾镜下超声联合气压弹道碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的方法及疗效。方法:B超引导下穿刺并扩张建立F22经皮肾镜操作通道,在F20.8肾镜下采用瑞士第三代EMS超声气压弹道碎石机,争取一期粉碎结石并主动吸出体外。结果:78例83侧肾结石,单侧结石清除时间43~156min,平均89min。结石粉碎率100%,结石取净率85.6%(71/83)。术后随访1~9个月,平均5.6个月,均无严重并发症如出血及感染,亦无结石复发。结论:经皮肾镜超声联合气压弹道碎石术可以明显地提高复杂性肾结石取石的效率,降低结石的残余率,具有高效、安全、微创的特点,有较好的推广应用价值。     

Bilateral renal calculi: assessment of staged v synchronous percutaneous nephrolithotomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Percutaneous stone removal has replaced open renal surgery and has become the treatment of choice for large or complex renal calculi. However, patients with large bilateral stone burdens still present a challenge. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been demonstrated to be a well-tolerated, safe, cost-effective, and expeditious treatment. We present what is, to our knowledge, the first large retrospective series comparing synchronous and asynchronous bilateral PCNL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A chart review was performed on 26 patients undergoing 57 PCNLs for bilateral renal calculi over a 7-year period. Seven patients received synchronous PCNL (same anesthesia; Group 1), and 19 patients underwent asynchronous PNL (procedures separated by 1-3 months; Group 2). Complete surgical and hospital records were available on all patients. The average stone burden for Group 1 was 8.03 cm(2) on the left and 9.18 cm(2) on the right v 10.1 cm(2) on the left and 14.23 cm(2) on the right for Group 2 (P> 0.05). Variables of interest included anesthesia time, operative time, blood loss, transfusion rates, length of hospital stay, and complication rates. Each variable was evaluated per operation and per renal unit. Follow-up imaging with stone assessment was available on 20 patients. RESULTS: Group 1 required 1.14 access tracts per renal unit to attempt complete clearance of the targeted stones v 1.88 tracts per renal unit in Group 2 (P> 0.05). The average operative time per renal unit was significantly less in Group 1 (83 minutes) than in Group 2 (168.5 minutes) (P< 0.0001), as was blood loss (178.5 mL v 307.4 mL, respectively; P= 0.02). However, blood loss per operation was similar at 357 mL in Group 1 and 282 mL in Group 2. Comparable transfusion rates of 28.6% and 36.8%, respectively, were noted. Forty percent of the patients in Group 1 were completely stone free compared with 36% of the patients in Group 2; however, an additional 50% and 57%, respectively, had residual stone burden <4 mm (P> 0.05). Complications occurred in 2 of 7 operations (28%) in Group 1 and 8 of 42 operations (19%) in Group 2. The total length of hospital stay was nearly doubled for patients undergoing staged PCNL (P= 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate similar stone-free rates, blood loss per operation, and transfusion rates for simultaneous and staged bilateral PCNL. The reduced total operative time, hospital stay, and total blood loss, along with the requirement for only one anesthesia, makes synchronous bilateral PCNL an attractive option for select individuals. However, in patients with larger, less easily accessible stones, excessive bleeding may be encountered more frequently on the first side, thereby delaying management of the second side to a later date. Synchronous bilateral PCNL should be considered in patients in whom the first stage of stone removal is accomplished quickly and safely.     

以肾中盏为目标肾盏行气压弹道联合超声碎石治疗鹿角形结石的效果及安全性

目的：探讨以肾中盏为目标肾盏,采用气压弹道联合超声碎石方式治疗鹿角形结石的效果及安全性。方法：取俯卧位,采用气压弹道联合超声碎石的方式,以肾中盏为目标肾盏行经皮肾镜碎石术（percutaneous nephrolithotomy,PCNL）治疗鹿角形结石患者145例184侧,其中不完全性鹿角形结石115例侧,完全性鹿角形结石69例侧。观察结石的排除率及并发症。结果：144例侧行一期单通道碎石（中盏）,7例侧行一期双通道碎石（中盏及下盏5例,中盏及上盏2例）;2例侧残留肾盏结石未进一步处理,自动出院;31例侧行二期碎石,单通道者29例,其中4例先行ESWL再行PCNL碎石;双通道者2例（中盏及上盏1例,中盏及下盏1例）。151例侧排尽结石,其中完全性鹿角形结石54例侧,不完全性鹿角形结石97例侧,结石清除率82．1％。手术时间120～330min,平均（147±23）min。血红蛋白下降1～4g／L,平均下降（2．0±0．6）g／L,术中输血22例,术后输血5例;术后肾盂内感染3例,合并肾周感染、单侧分肾功能受损1例。平均住院时间（13．0±3．5）天。结论：以肾中盏为目标肾盏行PCNL治疗鹿角形结石是非常有效和安全的;气压弹道联合超声碎石对鹿角性结石的清除率较高,治疗时问短,并发症少。     

Significance of lower-pole pelvicaliceal anatomy on stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy in nonobstructive isolated renal pelvic stones

PURPOSE: To investigate the probable effect of lower-pole pelvicaliceal anatomy on stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with nonobstructive renal pelvic stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical records of patients with isolated renal pelvic stones who underwent SWL between 1996 and 2005 were reviewed. After excluding patients with obstruction leading to dilatation, major anatomic abnormalities, noncalcium stones, metabolic abnormalities, history of recurrent stone disease, multiple stones, and previous renal surgery, 153 patients were enrolled in the study. Lower pole infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) and infundibular length and width were measured from intravenous urography. Patients were classified into three groups according to stone burden (group 1, <100 mm(2); group 2, 101-200 mm(2); group 3, 201-400 mm(2)). RESULTS: The mean stone size was 142.08+/-86.3 mm(2). Overall stone-free rate was 53.6%. Localization of clinically significant or insignificant residual fragments was in the lower calix, renal pelvis, and both in 50 (32.6%), 29 (18.9%), and 8 (5.2%) patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in pelvicaliceal anatomic features except narrower IPA (P=0.02) in group 1 patients with residual stones. CONCLUSION: The falling of stone fragments to the lower calix in spite of the ureter whether clinically significant or not after SWL of pelvic stones initially seems to be related to stone burden rather than lower caliceal anatomy. However, existence of a more narrow IPA in group 1 patients with residual fragments led us to believe that lower-pole IPA can play a role in stone clearance, especially for smaller stones, probably because of smaller residual fragment size or the more mobile nature of the primary stone.     

Supra-costal tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is not associated with increased complication rate: a prospective study of safety and efficacy of supra-costal versus sub-costal access

Background

To assess the morbidities of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using supra-costal access and re-evaluate traditional concept of increased complications with supra-costal access.

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2014, a single surgeon performed 118 consecutive one-stage fluoroscopic guided PCNL’s for complex renal and upper ureteral stone. Our definition for complex renal stone is defined as partial or complete staghorn stone, multiple renal stones in more than 2 calyxes, obstructive uretero-pelvic stone >?2?cm, and a renal stone in single functional kidney. Inclusion criteria include: staghorn stones, renal calculi >?2?cm in diameter, upper ureteral stone >?1.5?cm in diameter. Exclusion criteria for tubeless PCNL include: significant bleeding or perforation of the collecting system, large residue stone, multiple PCNL tract and obstructive renal anatomy. Morbidity, operation time, analgesia requirement, length of hospital stay, stone- free rate, were analyzed.

Results

Of the 118 consecutive PCNL, eighty-six patients underwent tubeless PCNL (56 supra-costal and 30 sub-costal) and included in our prospective follow-up period. The mean age, operation side, stone locations were similar. The male to female ratio is higher in supra-costal than sub-costal. Large renal stones and staghorn stones makes up for most patients (supra-costal: 75%, sub-costal: 80%). The stone–free rate of supra-costal group was 59% (33/56) and in sub-costal group was 50% (15/30). The operative times, length of stay, post-op analgesic use, hematocrit change was similar in both groups. The overall complication rate is 6% [supra-costal (1/56), sub-costal (4/30)] with the majority being infectious complications.

Conclusions

Supra-costal access above 12th rib during tubeless PCNL is safe and effective procedure and is not associated with higher incidence of post-op complications in experience hands.

     

Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: call of the day

PURPOSE: We challenge the routine placement of nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) without taking into consideration the size, burden, and multiplicity of the stones; the degree of obstruction of the pelvicaliceal system, or any anatomic variations of the kidney in shape or position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 to March 2006, 110 patients underwent PCNL, 77% of whom had multiple stones. The mean size of the single stones was 4.3 cm (range 2.8-6.5 cm), and the mean single-stone burden was 7.2 cm2 (range 5.6-14.3 cm2). The mean burden of multiple stones was 11.4 cm2 (range 8-23 cm2). Among the patients, 18 had had previous renal surgery, 12 had renal insufficiency, and 7 had a solitary functioning kidney. One patient each had horseshoe kidney and malrotated kidney. In 106 patients, no nephrostomy drain was placed, only an externalized 5F ureteral catheter for 16 to 20 hours. Two patients had simultaneous bilateral tubeless PCNL. The outcome was evaluated prospectively. The frequency of complications, length of hospital stay, and stone-free status were assessed. RESULTS: A stone-free rate of 80% was achieved using PCNL as monotherapy. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 16 to 20 hours. Three patients required placement of a nephrostomy tube because of significant bleeding and one because of purulent renal discharge. In four patients, a ureteral catheter was replaced by a stent because of significant residual stone burdens. The initial 18 patients underwent ultrasound examination on the first postoperative day, and none demonstrated any extrarenal collection, so routine ultrasound examination was omitted in succeeding patients. One patient required exploration because of a retroperitoneal hematoma. CONCLUSION: Omission of a nephrostomy tube after PCNL while retaining an externalized ureteral catheter for 16 to 20 hours is sufficient and safe irrespective of the stone characteristics. Shape, position, and function of the kidneys are also irrelevant with regard to tubeless PCNL.     

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: early and late anatomical and functional results

PURPOSE: We report our experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in children, and evaluate its early and late anatomical and functional results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 65 children with renal calculi were treated with PCNL. Patient age at operation ranged from 9 months to 16 years (mean +/- SD of 5.9 +/- 0.9 years), and 27 (41.5%) were younger than 5 years. Seven patients had bilateral renal stones and, therefore, the number of kidneys treated by PCNL was 72. The patients were followed regularly every 3 months during year 1 and every 6 months thereafter. Renal scans using technetium dimercapto-succinic acid for detection of renal scarring and technetium diethylenetetramine-pentaacetic acid for determination of selective glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were performed in all patients at least once during followup, which ranged from 6 to 72 months (mean +/- SD 40 +/- 10). RESULTS: Early complications included significant intraoperative bleeding in 1 case, renal pelvis perforation in 1 and transient fever in 2. Mean hospital stay +/- SD was 3 +/- 1.2 days (range 2 to 21). Of the renal units 62 (86%) were stone-free after a single PCNL, and the remaining 10 with residual stones were treated with a second look PCNL (4) and shock wave lithotripsy (6). Stone-free rates at hospital discharge and at 3 months were 93% and 100%, respectively. During followup 6 patients (9%) had recurrence of small renal stones and were successfully treated with shock wave lithotripsy. None of the kidneys had scarring on dimercapto-succinic acid renal scan. All of the kidneys except 1 showed improvement or stabilization of the corresponding GFR determined by diethylenetetraminepentaacetic acid renal scan. Comparison of the mean preoperative GFR of the corresponding kidney (28.8 +/- 11.2 ml per minute) with mean value at followup (36.1 +/- 9.9) showed an increase of statistical significance (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PCNL is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of children with renal calculi. At long-term followup the procedure improves renal function without renal scarring.     

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes: Re‐audit in 2005

Aim: To evaluate the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for upper urinary tract stones in 2005 in our hospital and to compare with the results obtained in 2000. Methods: The present study reviewed the outcomes of standardized PCNL, a one‐stage procedure under sedo‐analgesia, for upper urinary tract stones in 2000 and 2005 in Queen Elizabeth Hospital. In 2000, 74 PCNL were carried out using holmium laser, Swiss lithoclast or electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) for stone fragmentation. Thirty to 40% of staghorn stones and 80–100% of complicated renal and upper ureteric stones achieved stone‐free clearance after single‐session PCNL. In 2005, 82 PCNL were performed after the introduction of three strategies, namely: multiple tract access, flexible nephroscopic exploration and the new‐generation ultrasonic lithotripter. The outcomes were evaluated and compared to those in 2000 according to the different categories of stones. Results: The results in 2005 were improved in terms of increased overall stone‐free rates (20% in single session and 5% after the final session), retreatment rate reduction (15%), and raised efficiency quotient (21.5), while the overall complication rate remained low (13.9%) compared to that in 2000. In 2005, in particular, the single‐session stone‐free rates of staghorn stones and renal pelvis stones were significantly improved to 70–80% (30–40% in 2000) and 100%, respectively (50–60% in 2000). Single‐session stone‐free rates for other stones remained at 90–100%. Conclusion: Our outcomes improvement could be attributed to the maturation of the PCNL technique, use of multiple tract access, use of flexible nephroscopy, and ultrasonic lithotripsy.     

Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 5 years of experience in 201 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2000 to September 2005, 201 patients with renal stones >2 cm underwent tubeless PCNL by a single surgeon. We report details of the outcomes. RESULTS: The complete stone clearance rate was 91.04% (183 patients). After surgery, 18 patients (8.96%) had stones (mean size = 7 mm) detected on a plain abdominal radiograph or ultrasonographic examination and were referred for shockwave lithotripsy. The mean stone size was 30 mm (range 20-40 mm). The mean operative time was 35 minutes (range 30-60 min), and the mean hospital stay was 3.5 days (range 2-5 days). Postoperative ultrasonography did not reveal considerable fluid collection. There were no visceral injuries. Twenty-two (10.9%) patients received a transfusion, and 16 (7.9%) patients had urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: In our experience, tubeless PCNL is safe, effective, and feasible without any discomfort for patients.     

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring multiple tracts: comparison of morbidity with single-tract procedures

PURPOSE: To compare the morbidity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) requiring multiple percutaneous tracts with that of procedures requiring a single tract for calculus clearance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 20 patients undergoing PCNL through two or more percutaneous renal tracts over a 1-year period were compared with a contemporary cohort of 20 patients undergoing PCNL requiring a single tract. The mean stone size was 2157 mm(2) v 423 mm(2) (P < 0.0001), the baseline serum creatinine concentration was 1.67 mg/dL v 1.13 mg/dL (P < 0.05), and the baseline hemoglobin concentration was 11.8 g/dL v 13.4 g/dL (P < 0.05) in the multiple- and single-tract groups, respectively. RESULTS: All single-tract and 95% of multiple-tract patients were rendered stone free. The mean drop in hemoglobin was similar in the two groups (2.3 g/dL for single tract v 2.1 g/dL for multiple tracts; P = 0.55). Complications occurred in two patients in each group. Four multiple-tract patients required blood transfusion. The need for transfusion correlated with lower preoperative hemoglobin and higher preoperative serum creatinine. There was a significant rise in serum creatinine (1.67 mg/dL to 1.91 mg/dL; P < 0.05) and drop in creatinine clearance (76.9 mL/min to 67.2 mL/min; P < 0.05) in the multiple-tract group; this was more pronounced in patients with existing renal insufficiency. No significant change in renal function was seen in the single-tract group. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with PCNL utilizing multiple percutaneous tracts is highly effective in the treatment of staghorn and other large-volume renal calculi. Blood loss and complication rates with such an aggressive approach are comparable to those of PCNL incorporating a single percutaneous tract for more straightforward calculi.