Right ventricular cardiomyopathy: timing of heart transplantation in Uhl's anomaly and arrythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Transplant indications for right ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy have not been defined. We report on two boys, aged 18 and 17 years, one with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and one with Uhl's anomaly. Both had implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for the prevention of sudden death (SD), but were not considered urgent heart transplant candidates due to the absence of heart failure symptoms. A ventricular tachycardia‐induced cardiac collapse occurred at school in the Uhl patient and in hospital in the ARVC patient. In both patients, ICD shocks intermittently restored sinus rhythm but with inadequate circulation. Only the ARVC patient received early chest compressions and was saved to heart transplantation. Due to RV failure, both patients had evidence of Fontan‐type physiology, in whom pulmonary blood flow is passive and propelled by the transpulmonary pressure gradient and intrathoracic pressure alterations produced by breathing. In these cases, at resuscitation, systemic circulation is not established until after pulmonary blood flow is restored by breathing or chest compressions. An ICD alone is therefore not sufficient for the prevention of SD. When invasive data show evidence of Fontan‐type circulation, the patient may be considered for heart transplantation.     

Right atrial abnormalities in a patient with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy without ventricular tachycardia

We describe a 59-year-old woman with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Diagnosis of SSS was made because she had frequent episodes of sinus arrest with prolonged ventricular asystole. Cardiac images showed a dilated right atrium (RA) and a right ventricle (RV). Electroanatomical mapping of the RA showed extensive scarring with no recordable electrical potentials. Although she had frequent premature ventricular contractions, neither spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) nor induced VT was observed. Microscopic examination of the RV indicated fibrofatty myocardium. Atrial arrhythmias associated with SSS may be the cause of symptoms in some cases of ARVC.     

Tachykardie mit breitem QRS-Komplex bei einem 60-jährigen Patienten

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) represents an important differential diagnosis in patients with ventricular tachycardia in the absence of evident structural heart disease. Diagnosis of ARVC is currently based on task force criteria established in 1994. However, a commonly accepted modification of these criteria including recent imaging techniques is still missing. In this case report, a 60-year-old patient with sustained ventricular tachycardia is presented. MRI provided crucial findings for the diagnosis of ARVC despite the atypically old age. An electrophysiological study using three-dimensional mapping confirmed localization of pathologic MRI findings in the inferior RV. This region was identified as the morphological substrate for clinical ventricular tachycardia and catheter ablation was successfully performed. This case report illustrates the increasing importance of imaging techniques for diagnosis and guidance of therapy in patients with ventricular tachycardia.     

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in two pairs of monozygotic twins

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inheritant disease with an autosomal dominant mode of transmission with incomplete penetrance and variable expression. Linkage analysis in affected families succeeds in identifying 9 loci determining 9 subtypes of the disease. Genotype phenotype correlation is unclear and the influence of various environmental factors is discussed. OBJECTIVES: Genotype phenotype correlation in 2 pairs of monozygotic twins with ARVC and the role of environmental factors are analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 40 pts with ARVC and their 195 relatives there were 2 pairs of monozygotic twins: brothers, age 47 y; and sisters, age 48 y. History, ECG, Holter monitoring, 2D and Doppler Echo, and MRI were analyzed. RESULTS: Twin brothers: ARVC was diagnosed in the proband after the episode of VT with LBBB morphology (enlarged right ventricle, focal hypokinesia of apex, MR evidence of adipose tissue in RV wall). Identical morphology of RV was seen in asymptomatic twin brother. The patient presenting arrhythmia has been rowing for 4 years. Twin sisters: diagnosis was done during family screening. Both were asymptomatic. RV morphology typical for ARVC was found discrete in one of them (bulges adipose tissue in the RV apex); the latter showed changes suggesting RV abnormality (mild segmental dilatation of infundibulum, adipose tissue in a free wall of the RV). No differences in previous viral infections and sports involvement were observed. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Clinical picture of ARVC in monozygotic twins is not identical. 2. Strenuous effort may be a factor triggering the arrhythmia in pts with ARVC.     

Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia:Proposed Modification of the Task Force Criteria

The original 1994 International Task Force criteria for the clinical diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right yen tricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia （ARVC / D） were based on structural, histological, ECG,     

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Arrythmogenic right ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a cardiomyopathy characterized pathologically by fibrofatty replacement primarily of the RV and clinically by life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in apparently healthy young people. The prevalence of the disease has been estimated at 1 in 5,000 individuals, although this estimate will likely increase as awareness of the condition increases among physicians. Arrythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy is recognized as a cause of sudden death during athletic activity because of its association with ventricular arrhythmias that are provoked by exercise-induced catecholamine discharge. Diagnosis may be difficult because many of the electrocardiographic abnormalities mimic patterns seen in normal children, and the disease often involves only patchy areas of the RV. For this reason, international diagnostic criteria for ARVC were proposed by an expert consensus panel in 1996. Treatment is directed to preventing life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias with medications and the use of implantable defibrillators. This article will present in detail the etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of this condition.     

Risk stratification in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetic cardiomyopathy characterized by myocyte death and fibrofatty replacement mostly in the right ventricle. It is a leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in individuals under the age of 35 years. The main goal in the treatment of the disease is the prevention of SCD. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the only proven life-saving therapeutic option able to improve survival in ARVC patients. This therapy is not free from side effects and it accounts for a relatively high rate of morbidity because of the occurrence of inappropriate ICD interventions and of complications, both at implantation and during the follow-up. In recent years, the approach to ICD implantation has been changing on the basis of new emerging data on risk stratification. The usefulness of ICD implantation for secondary prevention has been definitively proven; the most challenging question is how to treat patients with no history of previous cardiac arrest or hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT). The value of ECG abnormalities, syncope, VT, and right/left ventricular involvement as predictors of SCD has been assessed in different studies with the purpose of better defining risk stratification in ARVC. Nevertheless, in spite of the growing amount of data, primary prevention in ARVC patients remains mostly an individual decision.     

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: current diagnostic and management strategies

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a heart muscle disease of unknown etiology characterized by the peculiar right ventricular (RV) involvement. Distinctive pathologic features are myocardial atrophy and fibro-fatty replacement of the RV free wall, and clinical presentation is usually related to ventricular tachycardias with a left bundle branch block pattern or ventricular fibrillation leading to cardiac arrest, mostly in young people and athletes. Later in the disease evolution, progression and extension of RV muscle disease and left ventricular involvement may result in right or biventricular heart failure. The diagnosis of ARVC may be difficult because of several problems with specificity of ECG abnormalities, different potential etiologies of ventricular arrhythmias with a left bundle branch morphology, assessment of RV structure and function, and interpretation of endomyocardial biopsy findings. Therefore, standardized diagnostic criteria have been proposed by the Study Group on ARVC of the European Society of Cardiology. According to these guidelines, the diagnosis of ARVC is based on the presence of major and minor criteria encompassing electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, morphofunctional, histopathologic, and genetic factors. Since the assessment of sudden death risk in patients with ARVC is still not well established, there are no precise guidelines to determine which patients need to be treated and what is the best management approach. The therapeutic options include beta-blockers, antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The ICD is the most effective safeguard against arrhythmic sudden death. However, its precise role in changing the natural history of ARVC by preventing sudden and nonsudden death needs to be evaluated by a prospective study of a large series of patients. In patients in whom ARVC has progressed to severe RV or biventricular systolic dysfunction with risk of thromboembolic complications, treatment consists of current therapy for heart failure including anticoagulant therapy. In cases of refractory congestive heart failure, patients may become candidates for heart transplantation.     

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Risk Stratification and Indications for Defibrillator Therapy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetically determined disease which predisposes to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The main goal of ARVC therapy is prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the most effective therapy for interruption of potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Despite its life-saving potential, ICD implantation is associated with a high rate of complications and significant impact on quality of life. Accurate risk stratification is needed to identify individuals who most benefit from the therapy. While there is general agreement that patients with a history of cardiac arrest or hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia are at high risk of SCD and needs an ICD, indications for primary prevention remain a matter of debate. The article reviews the available scientific evidence and guidelines that may help to stratify the arrhythmic risk of ARVC patients and guide ICD implantation. Other therapeutic strategies, either alternative or additional to ICD, will be also addressed.     

Outcome of cardioverter–defibrillator implant in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

The aim of the present study was to investigate outcomes of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) treatment in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). We reviewed baseline/follow-up data of 15 consecutive ARVC patients (mean age 55 ± 15 years) and 30 randomly drawn patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) (mean age 60 ± 10 years) with matching durations of follow-up (all implanted with ICDs for primary/secondary prevention of sudden death). At implant, appropriate placement of the RV lead was more difficult in ARVC patients. During follow-up (median 41 months), appropriate interventions for any ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 8 (53%) ARVC patients and 17 (57%) CAD patients, but the occurrence of high rate (>240 beats/min) ventricular tachyarrhythmias was higher in ARVC patients. Inappropriate ICD interventions occurred in 5 (33%) ARVC patients and 10 (33%) CAD patients. Lead-related adverse events requiring surgical revision occurred in 7 (47%) ARVC patients as compared with 4 (13%) CAD patients (P = 0.0004). While ICD implantation is highly effective for prevention of sudden death in ARVC, it does carry elevated burdens of long-term lead-related adverse events. These findings underline the need of careful follow-up in ARVC aimed at early recognition of complications that can impair ICD function.     

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy 2012: Diagnostic Challenges and Treatment

ARVC 2012 . The most common presentation of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is palpitations or ventricular tachycardia (VT) of left bundle branch morphology in a young or middle‐aged individual. The 12‐lead electrocardiogram may be normal or have T‐wave inversion beyond V₁ in an otherwise healthy person who is suspected of having ARVC. The most frequent imaging abnormalities are an enlarged right ventricle, decrease in right ventricular (RV) function, and localized wall motion abnormalities. Risk factors for implantable cardioverter defibrillator include a history of aborted sudden death, syncope, young age, decreased left ventricular function, and marked decrease in RV function. Recent results of treatment with epicardial ablation are encouraging. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23 pp. 1149‐1153, October 2012)     

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: An update

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is a genetic cardiomyopathy characterized by ventricular arrhythmias and structural abnormalities of the right ventricle (RV). The diagnosis is based on the International Task Force criteria. Cardiologists may not be aware of these diagnostic criteria for ARVC/D and may place too much importance on the results of MRI imaging of the right ventricle. Patients with ARVC/D usually have an abnormal 12-lead electrocardiogram, abnormal echocardiogram, and ventricular arrhythmias with a left bundle branch block morphology. If noninvasive testing suggests ARVC/D, invasive testing with an RV angiogram, RV biopsy, and electrophysiologic study is recommended. Once a diagnosis of ARVC/D is established, the main treatment decision involves whether to implant an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. We also recommend treatment with β blockers. Patients with ARVC/D are encouraged to avoid competitive athletics. Recent advances in the understanding of the genetic basis of ARVC/D have revealed that ARVC/D is a disease of desmosomal dysfunction.     

A case of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy-Naxos disease

We present a case of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC)-Naxos disease. The patient is 21-year-old male with no history of previous heart disease admitted in a private hospital for rhythm disorder in heart. The condition was diagnosed as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and was treated with cardioversion. The patient was referred to our hospital for further evaluation. On examination patient had palmoplantar keratoderma, wooly hair, and dystrophic nails. The cardiovascular system examination was clinically normal. His electrocardiogram showed epsilon wave in lead V1; echocardiography showed hypo-echogenic tissues in the right ventricular (RV) apex and free wall; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) investigation revealed fibrofatty replacement of RV free wall and dyskinetic RV wall with diastolic outbulging.     

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: three cases

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a rare disease characterized by replacement of myocardium with fibrofatty tissue. It mainly involves the right ventricle (RV) and causes abnormal RV performance. ARVC is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in young Italian athletes because it induces malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Clinical manifestations of ARVC may be different between Chinese and Western patients. In this paper, we share our experience of the clinical manifestations of ARVC and review previous reports of ARVC.     

Review on the genetics of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is a clinical and pathologic entity whose diagnosis rests on electrocardiographic and angiographic criteria; pathologic findings, replacement of ventricular myocardium with fatty and fibrous elements, preferentially involve the right ventricular (RV) free wall. There is a familial occurrence in about 50% of cases, with autosomal dominant inheritance with variable penetrance and polymorphic phenotypic expression, and is one of the major genetic causes of juvenile sudden death. When the dysplasia is extensive, it may represent the extensive form of ARVCM (arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy). In this review, we focus on the some candidate genes mutations and information on some genotype-phenotype correlation in the ARVD. Our findings are in agreement with those of European Society of Cardiology who stated that: genetic analysis is usefull in families with RV cardiomyopathy because whenever a pathogenetic mutation is identified, it becomes possible to establish a presymptomatic diagnosis of the disease among family members and to provide them with genetic counseling to monitor the development of the disease and to assess the risk of transmitting the disease offspring. On the basis of current knowledge, genetic analysis does not contribute to risk stratification of arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy.     

Patients with Scar-Related Right Ventricular Tachycardia: Determinants of Long-Term Outcome

Introduction: Patients with established arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) based on task force (TF) criteria and ventricular tachycardia (VT) are at risk of VT recurrence and sudden death. Data on patients with VT due to right ventricular (RV) scar not fulfilling TF criteria are lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term arrhythmia recurrence rate and outcome in patients with scar-related right VT with and without a diagnosis of ARVC/D.
Methods: Sixty-four patients (age 43.5 ± 15 years, 49 males) presenting with nonischemic scar-related VT of RV origin were studied. Scar was identified by electroanatomical mapping, contrast echocardiography, and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients were evaluated and treated according to a standard institute protocol.
Results: Twenty-nine (45%) patients were diagnosed with ARVC/D according to TF criteria (TF+) and 35 (55%) with RV scar of undetermined origin (TF–) at the end of follow-up (64 ± 42 months). Patients were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs, radiofrequency catheter ablation, and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. VT recurrence-free survival for TF+ and TF– was 76% versus 74% at 1 year and 45% versus 50% at 4 years (P = ns). Patients with fast index VT (cycle length [CL]≤ 250 ms, n = 31) were more likely to experience a fast VT during follow-up than patients with a slow index VT (CL > 250 ms, n = 33) (61% vs 3%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Scar-related RV VTs have a high recurrence rate in TF+ and TF– patients. Patients presenting with a fast index VT are at high risk for fast VT recurrence and may benefit most from ICD therapy.     

右心室心肌病室性心动过速诊治的新进展

致心律失常右心室心肌病室性心动过速是青壮年猝死的常见疾病,传统的治疗方法是在药物基础上的植入埋藏式自动复律仪治疗;由于我国的经济欠发达状况,普通患者难以负担植入埋藏式自动复律仪,以及导管消融新设备的开发和消融技术的进步,导管消融技术已经是部分患者的一线治疗。现就致心律失常右心室心肌病诊治新进展进行综述。     

The impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy on survival in autosomal-dominant arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVD5)

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with familial arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is a cause of sudden cardiac death, which may be prevented by ICD. METHODS: We studied 11 families in which a 3p25 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) haplotype at locus ARVD5 segregated with disease and compared mortality in subjects who received an ICD with that in control subjects who were matched for age, gender, ARVC status, and family. Subjects (n = 367) at 50% a priori risk of inheriting ARVC were classified as high risk (HR) (n = 197), low risk (n = 92), or unknown (n = 78) on the basis of clinical events, DNA haplotyping, and/or pedigree position. Forty-eight HR subjects (30 males, [median age 32 years] and 18 females [median age 41 years]) were followed after ICD (secondary to ventricular tachycardia [VT] in 27%). Survival was compared with 58 HR control subjects who were alive at the same age to-the-day at which the ICD subject received the device. RESULTS: In the HR group, 50% of males were dead by 39 years and females by 71 years: relative risk of death was 5.1 (95% confidence interval 3 to 8.5) for males. The five-year mortality rate after ICD in males was zero compared with 28% in control subjects (p = 0.009). Within five years, the ICD fired for VT in 70% and for VT >240 beats/min in 30%, with no difference in discharge rate when analyzed by ICD indication. CONCLUSIONS: The unknown mutation at the ARVD5 locus causing ARVC results in high mortality. Risk stratification using genetic haplotyping and ICD therapy produced improved survival for males.     

Arrhythmogene rechtsventrikuläre Kardiomyopathie

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetically determined heart muscle disease and a major cause of sudden cardiac death and ventricular tachyarrhythmia in young, apparently healthy individuals and athletes. Patients affected by ARVC should be excluded from competitive sports and vigorous training. To provide optimal treatment, early diagnosis and risk stratification are mandatory and genetic counseling of families is recommended. Tailored treatment strategies aim at the prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmia and sudden death as well as the preclusion of disease progression and symptomatic heart failure. Patients with a low risk of sudden death need either no specific treatment or can be treated with beta blockers or antiarrhythmic drugs, depending on the clinical manifestation of the arrhythmia. Catheter ablation in ARVC constitutes a symptom-oriented and palliative approach for frequently relapsing ventricular tachycardia refractory to antiarrhythmic medication. However, despite good acute results of catheter ablation, there is a high incidence of recurrence during long-term follow-up. In patients with ARVC at high risk of sudden death, implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) improves long-term survival by detection and termination of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. In the long term, however, the cumulative incidence of mainly lead-related complications of ICD therapy must be considered in the young population with ARVC, particularly when the indications are for primary prevention of sudden death or life-threatening arrhythmias. The proposed algorithm of therapeutic management in ARVC is under constant validation, development and refinement.     

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (dysplasia): etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a disorder characterised by progressive replacement of right ventricle myocardium by either segmental or diffuse fibro-fatty tissue, often with the involvement of the left ventricular wall and manifestations of arrhythmia. Familial occurrence with autosomal dominant inheritance, variable expression and incomplete penetrance is estimated as 1/5000. The recessive form called Naxos disease has also been reported. The etiology and pathogenesis of ARVC are still unknown. Advanced theories of inflammatory or infective etiology and possible mechanism of myocyte loss through apoptosis and/or transdifferentiation into adipocytes are presented in this article. The patterns of two distinct pathomorphology of ARVC based on the nature of myocardial replacement are also presented. The presentation encompasses the wide spectrum of clinical diagnostic features of the disease, including sudden death in the family and abnormalities in ECG, Echo, MRI, angiography, PES exhibiting morphologic and functional changes, and replacement of myocytes by fibro-fatty tissue observed in endomyocardial biopsy specimens. Special attention is drawn to the subtle clinical manifestations and ECG clues of the disease in children and young people. Treatment modalities including drug therapy, ablation, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, antiarrhythmic surgery or heart transplantation are also presented.