University of Wisconsin solution versus Celsior solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the safety and efficacy of University of Wisconsin solution (UW) and Celsior solution (C) in pancreas transplantation (PTx). METHODS: A retrospective review of 154 PTx performed over a 61-month period included 77 grafts preserved with UW and 77 with C. The two groups were comparable for both donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: After a mean cold ischemia time of 624 minutes (range 360 to 945 minutes) for UW versus 672 minutes (range 415 to 1005 minutes) for C (P = NS), no primary endocrine nonfunction occurred. Delayed endocrine function was diagnosed in two grafts in the UW group (2.6%) versus none in the C group (P = NS). After a minimum follow-up of 4 months (mean 26.5 +/- 15.2 months), 22 recipients (UW = 11 vs C = 11; P = NS) required relaparotomy. Overall, 18 pancreata were lost due to either patient death with functioning graft (UW = 4 vs C = 1; P = NS) or graft loss due to other reasons (UW = 8 vs C = 5; P = NS). Actuarial 1- and 5-year patient survival rates were 93.5% and 86.8% for UW compared with 98.7% and 98.7% for C (P = .04). Actuarial graft survival rates at the same times were 88.3% and 75.0% for UW compared with 90.4% and 90.4% for C (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia times reported in this study, UW and C show similar safety and efficacy profiles for PTx.     

Pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions: a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND: Celsior is an extracellular-type, low-viscosity, preservation solution already used for heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation. We report the results of a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study specifically designed to compare the safety profile of Celsior solution with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution in clinical pancreas transplantation. METHODS: A total of 105 consecutive procurements were randomized to graft preservation with UW (n=53) solution or Celsior (n=52) solution. The groups were comparable with regard to all donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: Five grafts were discarded and 100 grafts (50 UW vs. 50 Celsior) were transplanted. Mean cold and warm ischemia times were 11.0 +/- 2.1 hr and 37.2 +/- 6.0 min for UW compared with 10.8 +/- 1.8 hr and 38.1 +/- 5.9 min for Celsior (P =not significant). Delayed endocrine pancreas function was recorded in one graft preserved with UW solution. Eleven recipients (UW 12% vs. Celsior 10%, P =not significant) required a relaparotomy. The mean serum levels of glucose, amylase, and lipase remained comparable between the study arms at equivalent intervals after transplantation. One recipient died with functioning grafts in each study arm; two further grafts were lost to arterial thrombosis (Celsior) and chronic rejection (UW), respectively. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates overlapped in the two study arms (98% and 96%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia time reported in this study, UW and Celsior solutions have similar safety profiles for pancreas preservation.     

Kidney transplantation from elderly donors: a prospective randomized study comparing celsior and UW solutions

AIM: The aim of present study was to assess the effect of Celsior as compared with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution on immediate and long-term function of kidney transplants harvested from elderly donors. METHODS: A prospective multicenter randomized study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of Celsior versus UW solution for the clinical preservation of the kidney. Fifty renal transplants were performed from donors over 60 years old. Twenty-five kidneys were stored in Celsior and 25 in UW solution. The groups were comparable with regard to donor and recipient characteristics. Renal function outcomes were compared by evaluating delayed graft function rates, daily urinary output, as well as the evolution of mean serum creatinine at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 15 days. RESULTS: The warm ischemia time was 42.4 +/- 11 minutes among Celsior vs 46.9 +/- 17.9 minutes in the UW cohort (P = NS). The cold ischemia time was 18 +/- 4.5 hours in Celsior and 19 +/- 6.5 hours in UW (P = NS). Delayed graft function occurred in 48% of the Celsior group and in 52% of the UW group (P = NS). Mean serum creatinine levels and mean daily urinary output were also similar. One- and 5-year graft survivals of kidneys preserved with Celsior were 91.8% and 79.3% compared with 96% and 87.4% for UW without any significant statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the preservation of kidneys from elderly donors in Celsior solution is equivalent to that of UW solution.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin solutions as primary preservation in renal allografts undergoing pulsatile perfusion

INTRODUCTION: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is the standard preservation solution for organ transplantation. Histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate (HTK) solution has been used increasingly for kidney, pancreas, and liver transplantation. This study compared HTK and UW used during kidney procurement with subsequent pulsatile perfusion. METHODS: Between January and October 2003, 91 deceased renal and simultaneous kidney pancreas transplants were performed (UW, n = 41, and HTK, n = 50). There were no differences with regard to donor and recipient demographics or cold ischemia. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 3 (7%) of UW and 4 (8%) of HTK-preserved kidneys (P = NS). There were no significant differences between patient or graft survival. There was an anticipated difference between total preservative volumes used (HTK: 4.1 +/- 1.0 vs UW: 3.0 +/- 0.5; P < .005). CONCLUSION: UW and HTK appear to have similar efficacy in kidney preservation with pulsatile perfusion. HTK preservation solution can be used safely in conjunction with pulsatile preservation for cold storage of renal allografts.     

Organ preservation with histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation: an update of the indiana university experience

In May 2003, University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was replaced with Histidine-Tryptophan Ketoglutarate (HTK) solution as the preservation fluid for abdominal organ procurements in our center. Herein we have reported our updated results with HTK in pancreas transplantation. Between May 2003 and October 2006, 152 pancreas transplantations were performed in which 146 used HTK. The procedures were as follows: simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (n = 85; 55%), pancreas after kidney transplantation (n = 41; 30%), and solitary pancreas transplantation (n = 20; 15%). Donor and recipient data were collected with primary outcomes as primary nonfunction (PNF), and 30-day and 1-year graft and patient survival. Patient demographics are as follows: age (36 +/- 12 years), gender (males, 89: females, 57), race (white, 135; African American, 11). Mean flush volume was 3.8 +/- 1 L. The mean cold ischemia time was 8 +/- 3 hours. Mean warm ischemia time was 48 +/- 23 minutes. There were no cases of PNF in this cohort. Thirty-day and 1-year patient survival rates were 99% and 95%, respectively. The 30-day and 1-year graft survivals rates were 95% and 93%, respectively. There were 10 grafts lost with 7 vascular complications (6 venous and 1 arterial thrombosis). There were 2 cases of chronic rejection and 1 graft lost to noncompliance. These statistics compare favorably with International Pancreas Transplant Registry reported 1-year survival for pancreas allografts. All other patients were insulin independent by discharge. Serum fasting blood glucose and serial amylase remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation to those of a historical UW cohort. Within this range of cold ischemia times, HTK appears to provide effective pancreas preservation.     

A comparison of cold storage solutions for pancreas preservation prior to islet isolation

BACKGROUND: Several solutions are used to preserve the pancreas prior to islet isolation. This study sought to assess whether the type of solution had an impact on the isolation outcome. METHODS: We reviewed data from 125 islet isolation procedures performed from January 2002 to January 2005. Pancreata were preserved in University of Wisconsin (UW) (n = 101), Celsior (CS) (n = 19), or IGL-1 (n = 5) solutions. Islet isolation results and transplantation rates were compared between groups. RESULTS: UW, CS, and IGL-1 groups were similar according to donor's age, weight, and body mass index. Weight of undigested pancreas was 20 +/- 13.1, 21.4 +/- 15.7, and 17.4 +/- 8.7 g for UW, CS, and IGL-1, respectively (P > .2). Final total number of IEQ was 267,000 +/- 132,000, 277,000 +/- 155,000, and 311,000 +/- 163,000, respectively (P > .4). Success rate (defined as >250,000 IEQ) was 55.5%, 52.9%, and 60% for UW, Celsior, and IGL-1 (P > .9); the transplantation rate was 42.2% for UW, 36.8% for Celsior, and 80% for IGL-1 preservation (P > .2). CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, UW, Celsior, and IGL-1 solutions demonstrated similar islet isolation results. The new IGL-1 solution appears promising.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution for organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is currently the standard preservation solution used for abdominal organ transplantation. This study assesses the efficacy of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) compared with UW in pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Between October 2002 and August 2003, 20 pancreas transplants were performed. Patients were divided into two groups: UW (n=10) and HTK (n=10). Donor and recipient demographics were similar in both groups. The mean cold ischemia time for both groups was 11 +/-3 hr. RESULTS: There was an anticipated difference between total preservative volumes used (HTK: 4.5 +/- 1.2 L vs. UW: 3.4 +/-0.8 L; P =0.03). Patient and graft survivals to date were 100% in both groups. Serum fasting blood glucose, peak amylase, and serial amylase levels remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Within this range of cold ischemia time, UW and HTK demonstrate similar efficacy in pancreas preservation.     

Influence of preservation solution on human islet isolation outcome

BACKGROUND: The influence of the preservation solution used for in situ perfusion of the donor and pancreas storage on islet isolation has received little attention. METHODS: In this prospective controlled trial, we compared the outcome of human islet isolation from pancreata perfused with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution or Celsior, an alternative colloid-free extracellular solution. RESULTS: At the 1-year interim analysis, the viability and insulin secretion of islets isolated from donors perfused with UW (n=19) or Celsior (n=5) were identical. However, total islet recovery (IEQ) and isolation yield (IEQ/g) were 1.8-fold and 2.1-fold inferior in the Celsior group (P<0.05 vs. UW). Overall, 13 (68%) of islet preparations were effectively transplanted from the UW group vs. none from the Celsior group (P=0.01). The clinical study was discontinued and the causes of these differences were further explored in the pig (n=14). In contrast to UW, Celsior induced cell swelling and pancreas edema after only four hours of cold storage. These abnormalities were delayed when the donor was perfused with Solution de Conservation d'Organes et de Tissus (SCOT), an extracellular solution containing polyethylene glycol. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that colloid-free preservation solutions might be suboptimal for pancreas perfusion and cold storage prior to islet isolation and transplantation. Because pancreata are now frequently recovered for islet transplantation, preliminary experimental and clinical data about islet isolation should be obtained prior to the routine implementation of new preservation solutions for abdominal perfusion during multiorgan recovery.     

Efficacy of renal preservation: comparative study of Celsior and University of Wisconsin solutions

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy of Celsior and University of Wisconsin (UW) solutions on the perfusion and cold storage of renal grafts for human transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analyses of 313 kidney transplants were performed between 2002 and 2005; group A (n = 160), UW solution and group B (n = 153), Celsior solution were used in the preservation of the organs. The mean donor age was lower in group B (group A = 42.67 years vs group B = 38.96 years; P < .05), living donors were more frequent in the UW group (group A = 10% vs group B = 0.9%; P < .001). Multiorgan procurement procedures were more common in the Celsior group (group A = 75% vs group B = 81.7%; P < .001). Recipients with no associated comorbidities were more frequent in the UW group (group A = 50% vs group B = 36%; P < .001). Recipient mean age, cold ischemia time, and HLA matches were comparable. RESULTS: Delayed graft function (group A = 22.7% vs group B = 20.6%), acute rejections (group A = 21.4% vs group B = 18.4%), and serum creatinine at 6 months (group A = 1.75 vs group B = 1.67 mg/dL), 1 year (group A = 1.47 vs group B = 1.74 mg/dL), and 2 years (group A = 1.43 vs group B = 1.58 mg/dL) showed no differences (P = NS). Graft (group A = 82.23% vs group B = 84.11%) and patient (group A = 93% vs group B = 93.69%) survivals at 3 years were similar (P = NS). There were no differences in the causes of graft loss. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of UW and Celsior solutions is equivalent in the cold storage and renal preservation for transplantation.     

Comparison of Celsior and University of Wisconsin solutions in cold preservation of liver from octogenarian donors

BACKGROUND: Celsior (CS) has recently been proposed as a cold storage solution for thoracic and abdominal organs. We compared University of Wisconsin (UW) and CS solutions for the preservation of livers from old donors, with regard to initial function as well as short- and long-term graft and patient survival. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study from 1998 to 2002 includes 30 livers from octogenarian donors preserved in CS (n = 15) or UW (n = 15) solution prior to transplantation. Donor and recipient clinical and laboratory parameters as well as liver biopsy results were evaluated in all cases. RESULTS: The distribution of the main donor variables as well as recipient characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean cold ischemia time was 421 minutes in the CS group and 474 minutes in the UW group. Mild steatosis was present in 8 cases in the CS group and 7 cases in the UW group. No primary graft dysfunction or arterial or biliary complications were noted. There was 1 acute rejection episode in the CS group and 4 in the UW group. Late postoperative deaths were observed only in the UW group (ie, 7 of 15). Actuarial graft survival was 100% in the CS group vs 86.7% in the UW group (P = NS) at 3 months, and 100% in the CS group vs 52.5% in the UW group (P =.007) at 12 months. Patient survival was 100% in the CS group vs 93.3% in the UW group (P = NS) at 3 months, and 100% in the CS group vs 59.3% in the UW group (P =.01) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Both CS and UW solutions effectively protect livers obtained from donors >80 years of age during the early postoperative course but the CS group had better long-term results.     

Pancreas preservation with the University of Wisconsin versus Celsior solutions

INTRODUCTION: The use of Celsior solution for organ preservation has not been thoroughly studied in pancreas transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions for preservation of pancreas grafts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1995 to December 2005, 72 patients with type 1 diabetes underwent pancreas transplantation. There were 42 men and 30 women, with a mean age at transplantation of 38.1 +/- 7.5 years (range: 27 to 55 years), and a mean duration of diabetes of 22.5 +/- 6.6 years. Recipients were classified into two groups according to the preservation solution: (A) Celsior (n = 28, 38.9%) and (B) Wisconsin (n = 44, 61.1%). RESULTS: The donor and recipient characteristics were similar in both groups. There were five cases of venous thrombosis in the Wisconsin group and two in the Celsior group (P = NS). The venous drainage technique in the former group was portocaval in 19 patients and portoiliac in 25; in the Celsior group, portocaval in 23 patients and portoiliac in five (P = .001). Enteric drainage was used in 19 patients from the Celsior group and 17 patients from the Wisconsin group (P = .01). Actuarial 2-year graft survival was 74.6% in the Wisconsin group and 77.4% in the Celsior group (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in venous thrombosis between the two groups. The lower rate of venous thrombosis with the portocaval technique was related to the type of venous drainage rather than the type of preservation solution. Celsior solution may be considered as good as Wisconsin solution for pancreas transplantation.     

Human islet transplantation from pancreases with prolonged cold ischemia using additional preservation by the two-layer (UW solution/perfluorochemical) cold-storage method

BACKGROUND: A two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution/perfluorochemical [UW/PFC]) cold-storage method delivers sufficient oxygen to the pancreas during preservation and restores the ischemically damaged pancreas. In this study, we determined whether the additional preservation by the two-layer method could improve islet recovery from human pancreases with prolonged cold storage in UW. METHODS: Human pancreases were procured from cadaveric organ donors and preserved by the two-layer method (UW/PFC) for 2.9+/-0.7 hours (mean+/-SEM) at 4 degrees C after 11.8+/-1.5 hours of cold storage in UW (UW/PFC group, n=7), or by cold UW alone for 11.3+/-0.3 hours (UW group, n=14). The selected pancreases met the criteria of having at least 10 hours of cold storage in UW. All were processed by using a standard protocol of Liberase perfusion with Pefabloc by way of the duct, gentle mechanical dissociation, and Ficoll gradient purification. Transplanted islets were selected with the criteria of the Edmonton protocol (>5,000 islet equivalents [IE]/kg recipient body weight). RESULTS: The islet recovery was significantly increased in the UW/PFC group compared with the UW group (349.2+/-44.1 x 10 and 214.0+/-31.0 x 10 IE, respectively; <0.05). This resulted in islet yields of 4.6+/-1.0 x 10 IE/g of pancreas in the UW/PFC group compared with 2.0+/-0.3 x 10 IE/g of pancreas in the UW group ( <0.05). Five of 7 cases (71%) in the UW/PFC group and 5 of 14 cases (36%) in the UW group were transplanted. The islet grafts in the UW/PFC group improved the ability of glycemic control and decreased exogenous insulin administration in all recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in methods to preserve and recover ischemically damaged human pancreases before islet isolation and transplant could be extremely beneficial to the field of clinical islet transplantation. This preliminary study shows that additional short preservation by the two-layer (UW/PFC) cold-storage method can significantly improve islet recovery and increase opportunities of islet transplantation from human pancreases after prolonged cold ischemia.     

A comparative study of Celsior and University of Wisconsin solutions based on 12-hr preservation followed by transplantation in canine models

BACKGROUND: Celsior is a recently developed extracellular-type preservation solution that is effective in organ preservation. This experimental study was designed to compare the effects of Celsior and University of Wisconsin (UW) solutions in myocardial protection, using 12-hour preservation followed by orthotopic transplantation. METHODS: Fourteen pairs of adult mongrel dogs were divided into 2 groups. In the UW group (n = 7), UW solution at 4 degrees C was used for coronary vascular washout and storage following cardiac arrest with glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) solution. In the Celsior group (n = 7), Celsior solution was used to produce cardiac arrest, for coronary vascular washout, and for storage. After 12-hour cold preservation, orthotopic transplantation was performed under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The rate of recovery (%) of cardiac function of donor hearts was compared 1 and 2 hours after weaning from CPB, and then the transplanted hearts were harvested for histological study. RESULTS: Hemodynamic parameters including cardiac output, left ventricular pressure (LVP), and the maximum rates of positive and negative increase of LVP after transplantation were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the Celsior group than in the UW group 2 hours after weaning from CPB. The transmission electron microscopic study found that degeneration of the mitochondria in the Celsior group was less extensive than in the UW group. CONCLUSION: Celsior solution enhanced the cardiac function of hearts preserved for 12 hours prior to transplantation compared to UW solution. Our results indicate that Celsior solution is equivalent or superior to UW solution for cardiac preservation.     

Two-layer method in short-term pancreas preservation for successful islet isolation

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether the two-layer method (TLM) offers advantages over UW storage solution for locally procured pancreata with cold ischemia time of <8 hours for successful islet isolation. METHODS: From October 2003 through February 2005, 22 human pancreata were procured locally from cadaveric donors and preserved using UW solution (n = 11) or TLM (n = 11). RESULTS: Donor characteristics were similar in the two groups, with no statistical difference. Cold ischemia time was 4.5 +/- 0.6 (2.5 to 8) hours in the UW and 5.1 +/- 0.5 (3 to 8) hours in TLM group (P > .05). Organs preserved with TLM were exposed to PFC for 4 +/- 0.5 (2 to 7.5) hours. After TLM preservation, 8 of 11 (72%) pancreata yielded >300,000 IEQ pancreatic islets, which met all criteria for clinical transplantation; after UW cold storage, only 3 of 11 isolations were equally successful (27%) (P < .05). Mean IEQ was higher in the TLM than in the UW group: 349,000 +/- 37,000 vs 277,800 +/- 34,000; IEQ/g was also higher at 5100 +/- 760 vs 3000 +/- 570, respectively (P < .05). Islet quality, characterized by purity, viability, and insulin SI, did not differ statistically in the two groups: 67 +/- 4 vs 74 +/- 4%, 87 +/- 2 vs 83 +/- 4%, and 4 +/- 0.7 vs 4.8 +/- 1, respectively (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The Two Layer Method for locally procured human pancreata with cold ischemia time lower than 8 hours offers significant advantage over UW cold storage increasing the pancreatic islet isolation yield and the isolation success rate.     

Follow-up experience using histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

In May 2003, at Indiana University, the standard cold preservation solution University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was replaced by histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate (HTK) solution. Earlier, we presented our initial experience with HTK in pancreas preservation with an analysis of the first 10 pancreas transplants. Here we report updated results with HTK in pancreas transplantation over the past 18 months. Between May 2003 and March 2005, a total of 87 pancreas transplants were performed with 78 of these organs utilizing HTK. Seventy five patients received 78 organ transplants. Surgical procedures performed were: simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (n = 50, 64%), pancreas after kidney transplantation (n = 19, 24%), solitary pancreas transplantation (n = 9, 12%). Donor and recipient data were collected with primary outcomes as primary nonfunction and 30-day graft and patient survivals, and compared to the UW cohort from our original report. Donor and recipient demographics were similar. Mean follow-up time is 12 +/- 6 months. The mean cold ischemia time was 9 +/- 3 hours. There were no cases of primary graft nonfunction. Thirty-day and 1-year patient survivals were 99% and 93%. The 30-day and 1-year graft survivals were 96% and 93%. There were five grafts lost, including three within the first month (two venous and one arterial thrombosis). There was one case of chronic rejection and one noncompliance. All other patients were insulin-independent by discharge. Serum fasting blood glucose and serial amylase remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation. Within this range of cold ischemia time, HTK appears to provide effective pancreas preservation.     

Celsior solution provides superior post-ischemic right ventricular function as compared with UW solution in a porcine heart transplantation model.

BACKGROUND: Use of the new cardioprotective Celsior solution has been suggested for organ preservation in cardiac transplantation, but selective data for right ventricular function, of special interest in the clinical setting, have not been evaluated. METHODS: Celsior solution was compared with the clinical standard University of Wisconsin solution (UW) in a porcine allogenic heart transplantation model with accurate isovolumic measurement of right ventricular (RV) function. RESULTS: Maximum RV developed pressures were significantly different between Celsior and UW groups (51.1 +/- 9.6 mm Hg vs 42.2 +/- 15.4 mm Hg after 1 hour, respectively, and 55.6 +/- 7.8 mm Hg vs 45.1 +/- 16.2 mm Hg after 2 hours, respectively; p = 0.02, 2-way analysis of variance). CONCLUSIONS: Celsior significantly improves post-ischemic right ventricular function when compared with UW solution in an experimental heart transplantation model.     

Celsior solution compared with University of Wisconsin solution (UW) and histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate solution (HTK) in the protection of human hepatocytes against ischemia–reperfusion injury

Celsior, a new preservation solution in thoracic organ transplantation was evaluated for efficacy in cold preservation of human hepatocytes and compared with University of Wisconsin solution (UW) and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK, Custodiol). Human hepatocyte cultures were preserved at 4 degrees C in Celsior, UW and HTK for 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h with 6 h of reperfusion. Levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; cell necrosis), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; mitochondrial function), and adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP; loss of intracellular energy) were measured. Cell necrosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, and loss of ATP were significantly ( P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.002, respectively) lower in Celsior than in HTK. The amount of cell necrosis and mitochondrial dysfunction in Celsior solution (CS) and UW was equal ( P=n.s.) up to 24 h and significantly lower in UW after 48 h ( P<0.001). Additionally, the intracellular level of ATP was significantly higher after ischemia ( P<0.001) and reperfusion from long-term ischemia (24, 48 h) ( P<0.002). We can conclude that Celsior was superior to HTK and equal to UW in the protection of human hepatocytes against cold preservation injury from ischemia and reperfusion. Furthermore, Celsior was effective in long-term preservation of human hepatocytes.     

Influence of pancreas preservation on human islet isolation outcomes: impact of the two-layer method

BACKGROUND: Human pancreas preservation for islet transplantation holds additional challenges and considerations compared with whole pancreas transplantation. The purpose of this study was to clarify the limitations of the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution and the potentials of the two-layer method (TLM) for pancreas preservation before human islet isolation. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated human islet isolation records between January 2001 and February 2003. One hundred forty-two human pancreata were procured from cadaveric donors and preserved by means of the UW solution (n=112) or TLM (n=30). Human islet isolations were performed using a standard protocol and assessed by islet recovery and in vitro function of islets. RESULTS: Eight to ten hours of cold ischemia in the UW solution is a critical point for successful islet isolations. It is difficult to recover a sufficient number of viable islets for transplantation from human pancreata with more than 10 hours of cold storage in the UW solution. The overall islet recovery in the TLM group was significantly higher than in the UW group. With 10 to 16 hours of cold storage, the success rates of islet isolations remained at 62% in the TLM group but decreased to 22% in the UW group. Transplanted islets in the TLM group worked well in the recipients. CONCLUSIONS: There are time limitations for using the UW solution for pancreas preservation before human islet isolation. The TLM is a potential method to prolong the optimal cold storage time for successful islet isolations.     

Efficacy and safety of Celsior preservation fluid in liver transplantation: one-year follow up of a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study

The purpose of this prospective, nine-center, non-randomized study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Celsior preservation fluid in liver transplantation using unselected donors. As data comparing allograft outcomes following liver transplantation using Celsior and University of Wisconsin (UW) preservation fluids are limited, we also compared our cohort with matched controls selected from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) who received total liver grafts preserved with UW solution during the same period. One hundred and forty patients who received livers preserved with Celsior were included. The primary endpoint, graft loss at one-yr post-transplantation, was observed in 24 patients (17.1%) which was not significantly different from the 20.0% pre-defined threshold rate (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.9, 23.4; p=0.398). Predictive factors for graft loss on univariate analysis were moderate-to-severe steatosis on the donor graft (5/22 patients with graft loss vs. 8/107 patients without, p=0.046) and duration of warm ischemia (1.4±1.1 h in patients with graft loss vs. 0.9±0.5 h in patients without, p=0.034). Hepatic artery thrombosis and stenosis occurred in seven (5.0%) and six (4.3%) patients, respectively. The comparison of our patients to 420 ELTR controls showed that one-yr graft survival rates (Celsior: 82.9%, 95% CI 75.8, 88.2; UW: 78.6%, 95% CI 74.4, 82.2) and Kaplan-Meier one-yr graft survival distributions (p=0.285) were similar. Within the cold ischemia time achieved in our study, liver preservation with Celsior appeared efficient and safe. Comparison with ELTR patients suggested that liver allograft survival was similar using Celsior or UW solution for preservation of unselected donor grafts.     

A comparative prospective study of two available solutions for kidney and liver preservation

BACKGROUND: Viaspan (University of Wisconsin [UW]) solution is the gold standard for abdominal organ preservation. Celsior (CEL) is an extracellular-type, low-potassium, low-viscosity solution, initially used for heart and lung preservation. We have performed a prospective multicenter study to compare the role of these cold-storage solutions on kidney and liver recovery after transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 15, 2000 to December 31, 2001, 441 (172 CEL and 269 UW) renal transplants (RT) and 175 (79 CEL and 96 UW) liver transplants (LT) were included in the study. RESULTS: Perfusate volume used was significantly lower in the UW group, being 4,732 +/- 796 mL versus 5,826 + 834 mL in the CEL group (P < 0.001). In LT, median total bilirubin serum levels were significantly higher at 5 and 7 posttransplant days in the UW group (90.6 and 92.3 micromol/L, respectively) as compared with CEL (51.3 and 63.4 micromol/L, respectively). After LT, primary nonfunction (PNF) rates in the CEL and UW groups were 3.8% and 4.2% (P = NS) respectively, with 1-year graft and patient survival being 83.3% versus 85.4% (P = NS) and 89.9% versus 90.6% (P = NS). After RT, delayed graft function (DGF) rates were 23.2% and 22.7% (P = NS), respectively; PNF rates were 1.9% and 1.7% (P = NS) respectively, with 1-year graft and patient survival being 92.3% versus 94.2% (P = NS) and 99.4% versus 97.7% (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: CEL solution was shown to be as effective as UW in both liver and kidney preservation. In LT patients, biliary function recovery is significantly better in the CEL group. CEL solution represents an efficacious option in multiorgan harvesting.