Myocardial infarction in diabetic vs non-diabetic subjects. Survival and infarct size following therapy with sulfonylureas (glibenclamide)

AIMS: Sulfonylureas may interfere with 'ischaemic preconditioning' and worsen the prognosis in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-seven non-diabetic patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction to one hospital over 6.5 years (72 deaths, in-hospital mortality 20.2%) were compared to 245 Type 2 diabetic patients categorized as having taken sulfonylureas (glibenclamide 7+/-3 mg x day(-1); n = 76, 25 deaths = 32.9%;P = 0.025), not having taken sulfonylureas (n = 89, 29 deaths = 33.0%;P = 0.012), and newly diagnosed as having diabetes (n = 80, 20 deaths = 25.0%). Survival was significantly different (log-rank test: P = 0.03). Increments in creatine kinase and creatine kinase(MB)activity were higher in non-diabetic patients (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality in Type 2 diabetic patients is higher than in non-diabetic patients suffering acute myocardial infarction regardless of whether or not they had been treated with sulfonylureas. Glibenclamide does not enlarge myocardial necroses.     

Relationship between antidiabetic treatment with QT dispersion during acute coronary syndromes in type 2 diabetes: comparison between patients receiving sulfonylureas and insulin.

Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) show prolongation of QT interval duration and its dispersion (QTd). Prolongation of QTd has been associated with inhomogeneity of ventricular recovery times and high arrhythmyogenic potential. Previous studies have shown that preservation of the ischaemic preconditioning is associated with shorter QTd. Sulfonylureas may inhibit cardiac ischaemic preconditioning. The effect, however, of the previous treatment with sulfonylureas on QTd in patients with ACS has not been studied so far. This cross-sectional study examined the effect of the previous antidiabetic treatment on QTd in patients with type 2 diabetes during ACS. A total of 150 patients with ACS (myocardial infarction: n = 120; unstable angina: n = 30) admitted to the coronary care unit of our hospital were studied. Three groups of patients were examined: patients without diabetes (n = 60); patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylureas alone or in combination with metformin (n = 50); and patients treated with insulin alone or in combination with metformin (n = 40). Standard 12-lead ECG recordings at admission to the coronary care unit were obtained. QT interval duration and QTd were measured using ECG analysis software. At admission, QTd was not different between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (72.1 +/- 21.7 vs. 78.4 +/- 21.3 msec, p = 0.13, respectively). Similarly, the values of the above interval were also not different between patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylureas and insulin (73.8 +/- 23.9 vs. 70.1 +/- 18.5 msec, p = 0.55, respectively). It is concluded that the previous treatment with either sulfonylureas or insulin does not affect QTd in patients with type 2 diabetes and ACS.     

Management and short-term outcome of diabetic patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction: results of a nationwide French survey

OBJECTIVES: To compare management and short-term outcome of diabetic and non-diabetic patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: This was a prospective epidemiological survey. All patients admitted in coronary care units in France in November 2000 for confirmed acute myocardial infarction were eligible to enter the study. RESULTS: Of the 2320 patients recruited from 369 centers, 487 were diabetic (21%). Compared to non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients were 5 years older, more often female, obese and hypertensive; they had more often a history of cardiovascular disease; they had a lower ejection fraction and worse Killip class. Reperfusion therapy was less frequent among diabetic patients (39% versus 51%; p=0.0001), as was the use of beta-blockers (61% versus 72%; p=0.0001), aspirin (83% versus 89%; p=0.0001) and statins (52% versus 60%; p=0.001) during hospitalization. Conversely, the use of ACE-inhibitors was more frequent (54% versus 44%; p=0.0001). 58% of diabetic patients received insulin during hospitalization. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 13.1% in diabetic patients and 7.0% in non-diabetic patients (risk ratio: 1.87; p=0.001). Diabetes remained associated with increased mortality after adjustment for relevant risk factors including age and ejection fraction (risk ratio: 1.51; p=0.07). In patients treated with antidiabetic drugs (chiefly sulfonylureas) before admission, 28-day mortality was 10.4% compared with 19.9% in diabetic patients on diet alone or untreated (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Despite higher cardiovascular risk and worse prognosis, in-hospital management of diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction remains sub-optimal. Patients previously treated with antidiabetic drugs including sulfonylureas had a better prognosis than untreated diabetic patients.     

Myocardial infarction and prevalence of diabetes mellitus. Is increased casual blood glucose at admission a reliable criterion for the diagnosis of diabetes?

AIMS: To investigate the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with acute myocardial infarction and to determine whether casual blood glucose and haemoglobin A1c measured at admission could be used to diagnose diabetes mellitus. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective study that included all patients with acute myocardial infarction hospitalized during a one-year period at a coronary care unit. Casual blood glucose was measured at admission, fasting blood glucose during the hospital stay and, if necessary for classification, 2-3 months after discharge. Haemoglobin A1c was measured once at admission. Of 305 patients included in the study, 285 could be classified into three groups: 21% of these had previously diagnosed diabetes, 4% had newly diagnosed diabetes and the remaining patients were categorized as non-diabetic. Casual blood glucose >or=11.1 mmol x l(-1)at admission was found in 12 patients with no previously known diabetes, but diabetes mellitus was confirmed in only six of these patients. Haemoglobin A1c showed considerable overlapping of values between the three groups of patients (i.e. patients with known diabetes mellitus, patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus and non-diabetics). CONCLUSION: One of four patients with acute myocardial infarction had diabetes mellitus. Increased casual blood glucose at admission was not a reliable measure to establish a diagnosis of diabetes and thus follow-up measures were necessary. Haemoglobin A1c was found to be an unreliable measure in the verification of diabetes.     

Long-term prognosis of diabetic patients with myocardial infarction: relation to antidiabetic treatment regimen. The TRACE Study Group.

AIMS: The present study was performed to evaluate pre-admission history, presentation, initial treatment and long-term mortality in patients with myocardial infarction and diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1990 and 1992, 6676 patients with acute myocardial infarction were screened for entry into the Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) study. In this cohort 719 (11%) of the patients had a history of diabetes. Among the diabetic patients 19% were treated with insulin, 52% with oral hypoglycaemic agents and 29% with diet only. The diabetic patients were slightly older, more likely to be female and had a higher prevalence of known cardiovascular disease. Even though the diabetic patients had the same frequency of ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram and the same admission delay, treatment with thrombolysis and aspirin was less frequently prescribed to the diabetic patients than to patients without diabetes. The mortality rate was significantly increased in the diabetic patients, 7-year mortality being 79% in insulin-treated, 73% in tablet-treated and 62% in diet-treated diabetic patients compared with 46% in patients without diabetes. In a multivariate analysis only diabetic patients treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents or with insulin had an increased mortality compared with non-diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes mellitus and myocardial infarction are treated with thrombolysis to a lesser extent than non-diabetic patients. Diabetic patients treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents or insulin, but not those treated with diet alone, have a significantly increased mortality following acute myocardial infarction compared with non-diabetic patients.     

Prognostic value of admission plasma glucose and HbA in acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: Stress hyperglycaemia increases the risk of mortality after acute myocardial infarction in diabetic and in non-diabetic patients. We aimed to determine the contribution of admission plasma glucose and HbA(1c) on post-acute myocardial infarction prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Admission plasma glucose and HbA(1c) were simultaneously measured in all patients consecutively hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction. Patient survival was measured on 5 and 28 days after admission. Patients were defined as having 'previously diagnosed diabetes' (personal history of diabetes defined using ADA 1997 criteria), 'no diabetes', those without previously diagnosed diabetes and HbA(1c) below 6.5%, or 'possible diabetes', i.e. those without previously diagnosed diabetes and HbA(1c) above 6.5%. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients included, four had died by day 5 and 14 by day 28. Admission plasma glucose was higher in patients who had died by day 28 (11.7 +/- 5.8 vs. 8.0 +/- 3.3 mmol/l, P = 0.002), whereas HbA(1c) was not (6.4 +/- 1.9 vs. 6.1 +/- 0.8%, NS). Admission plasma glucose was significantly higher in those who had died by day 28 after adjustment on HbA(1c). A multivariate analysis, including sex, age and heart failure prior to acute myocardial infarction, showed that admission plasma glucose concentration was an independent predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Twenty-seven of the patients had previously diagnosed diabetes and 119 had no history of diabetes. Eleven were found to have possible diabetes. Admission plasma glucose was significantly higher in previously diagnosed diabetes (11.1 +/- 5.6) than in the other groups: 7.7 +/- 2.9 in non-diabetes, 8.2 +/- 2.1 in possible diabetes (P < 0.0001). The relationship between HbA(1c)-adjusted admission plasma glucose and mortality after acute myocardial infarction was also found in the non-diabetes group. CONCLUSIONS: Admission plasma glucose, even after adjustment on HbA(1c), is a prognostic factor associated with mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Acute rather than the chronic pre-existing glycometabolic state accounts for the prognosis after acute myocardial infarction.     

Basal glucometabolic status has an impact on long-term prognosis following an acute myocardial infarction in non-diabetic patients

OBJECTIVES: Patients with diabetes are known to have a worse prognosis after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared with non-diabetic patients. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of glucometabolic status on long-term prognosis in non-diabetic patients with an AMI. The second aim was to evaluate the extent to which blood glucose levels at admission depended on acute stress, assessed as serum cortisol, previous glucometabolic status, measured as haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), or both. DESIGN: In a prospective study of patients with an AMI, blood glucose, HbA1c and cortisol were measured at admission. Fasting blood glucose was determined before discharge and also afterwards, if necessary, for classification. Patients were followed-up for 5.5 years. SUBJECTS: Of the 305 consecutive patients 24% were diagnosed as diabetic and 76% as non-diabetic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death or non-fatal myocardial re-infarction. RESULTS: In non-diabetic patients, a Cox regression model was used. With death or re-infarction as endpoint, the following prognostic factors had an impact on event-free survival: age (P<0.001), HbA1c (P=0.002), cortisol (P<0.001) and thrombolytic treatment (P=0.001). There was a correlation between cortisol and blood glucose at admission (r=0.44, P<0.001). Fasting blood glucose day 5 showed no association with event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In non-diabetic patients with AMI, admission HbA1c and cortisol were predictors for 5.5-year survival without recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction. The glucometabolic status of importance for prognosis was detected by HbA1c but not by fasting blood glucose or admission blood glucose, of which the latter was influenced by cortisol.     

Myocardial infarct size and mortality in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Abstract. Objectives. To study the infarct size and mortality in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and in non-diabetic subjects with their first acute myocardial infarction. Design. Seven year follow-up study of large representative cohorts of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and non-diabetic subjects (study 1) and the FINMONICA acute myocardial infarction register study in 1988-89 (study 2). Setting. Populations of the districts of the Kuopio University Hospital and Turku University Central Hospital (study 1). Populations of Kuopio and North Karelia provinces and Turku/Loimaa area (study 2). Subjects. Study 1: 1059 patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and 1373 non-diabetic subjects aged 45–64 years at baseline; during the follow-up 166 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (91 men and 75 women) and 30 non-diabetic subjects (25 men and five women) were hospitalized for their first acute myocardial infarction. Study 2: 1622 patients aged 25–64 years hospitalized for their first acute myocardial infarction; 144 patients (90 men and 54 women) had non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and 1153 (890 men and 263 women) were non-diabetic. Main outcome measures. The infarct size was assessed on the basis of maximum levels of serum cardiac enzymes (studies 1 and 2) and QRS-score (study 1). Results. No differences were found in maximum levels of serum cardiac enzymes between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Similarly QRS-score gave no suggestion of a difference in infarct size between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. In both studies mortality before hospital admission was similar in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, but mortality within 28 days from hospital admission was twice as high in diabetic patients as in non-diabetic patients. Cardiac failure was the main cause of death significantly more often in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic patients (study 2). Conclusions. Poorer prognosis of acute myocardial infarction in diabetic patients appears not to be explained by a larger infarct size but probably by adverse effects of the diabetic state itself on myocardial function.     

Catecholamines and thrombocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptors in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

In 28 patients with first myocardial infarction plasma catecholamines and thrombocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptors were studied. The first determination (by HPLC and radioligand binding, respectively) was performed immediately after hospital admission and 6 weeks later. In the acute phase of myocardial infarction plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline levels were high. No significant differences in thrombocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptors and plasma concentrations of adrenaline and noradrenaline were observed between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. In three non-surviving patients only the affinity of the alpha 2-adrenoceptor to the radioligand was decreased (P less than 0.05), the relatively high catecholamine levels failed to reach statistical significance. Six weeks after hospital admission, adrenaline plasma levels were significantly decreased in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, while noradrenaline was only lowered in non-diabetic patients (P less than 0.05). Only in this group did the receptor number (BMAX) show a significant elevation 6 weeks after hospital admission. We conclude that, in acute myocardial infarction, alpha 2-adrenoceptors mainly interact with noradrenaline. Accordingly, no adrenoceptor alteration occurred in diabetic patients, who showed only a decrease in adrenaline but not in noradrenaline plasma concentrations 6 weeks following myocardial infarction. The different patterns in diabetic and non-diabetic patients suggest an alteration of catecholamine metabolism in diabetes mellitus.     

Prognosis following first acute myocardial infarction in Type 2 diabetes: a comparative population study.

AIMS: To estimate the incidence of death and macrovascular complications after a first myocardial infarction for patients with Type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN: In a retrospective, incidence cohort study in the Tayside Region of Scotland we studied all patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of first acute myocardial infarction from 1 April 1993 to 31 December 1994. The primary endpoint was time to death. Secondary endpoints were 2-year incidence of hospital admission for angina, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, coronary angiography, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). RESULTS: The 147 patients with Type 2 diabetes had significantly worse survival with an increase in relative hazard of 67% compared with non-diabetic patients. After adjustment for age, sex, smoking status, prior heart failure, prior angina, delay to hospitalization, site of infarction, drug therapy with aspirin, beta-blockers, streptokinase and hyperlipidaemia and treated hypertension, Type 2 diabetes was still associated with a 40% higher death rate compared with people without diabetes (P < 0.05) There was no significant difference in death rates in those aged over 70 years, but an indication of a trend in younger individuals with a four-fold increase in death rate in those with diabetes aged < 60 years, compared with a rate ratio of 2.6 in those with diabetes aged 61-70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized patients with first acute myocardial infarction, Type 2 diabetes mellitus is consistently associated with increased mortality and increased hospital admission for heart failure. The estimated 4-year survival rate is only 50%. Our results indicate that younger subjects with Type 2 diabetes and acute myocardial infarction are a high-risk group deserving of special study, and support the argument for aggressive targeting of coronary risk factors among patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

新诊断的糖代谢异常对急性心肌梗死后左心室射血分数的影响

目的观察新诊断的糖代谢异常对急性心肌梗死后LVEF的影响。方法入选首次急性心肌梗死患者161例(对无糖尿病病史的患者发病7天后行口服葡萄糖耐量试验),根据检查结果及是否有糖尿病病史,分为正常糖耐量组(37例)、糖调节异常组(46例)、新诊断糖尿病组(37例)和既往已确诊糖尿病组(41例)。4组患者分别于发病后72 h内、30天行三维超声心动图检查评价左心室功能。结果糖调节异常组、新诊断糖尿病组和既往已确诊糖尿病组72 h内及30天随访时的LVEF均明显低于正常糖耐量组(72 h:(45.1±7.1)%、(45.0±7.2)%、(45.1±7.2)%vs(48.9±6.8)%,P<0.05;30天:(47.0±7.5)%、(47.8±7.3)%、(48.0±7.4)%vs (53.4±6.4)%,P<0.05]。结论新诊断的糖代谢异常也对急性心肌梗死后左心室功能产生不利的影响。     

Serum glucose levels and hospital outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction without prior diabetes: a community-wide perspective

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Elevated serum glucose levels are associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with diabetes in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. It is, however, unclear whether a similar association exists in nondiabetic patients and whether this relationship is changing over time. The objectives of this population-based investigation were to examine the magnitude of elevated glucose levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction and the association between admission serum glucose levels and hospital outcomes in patients not known to have prior diabetes. METHODS: The sample consisted of 3601 patients without a history of prior diabetes who were hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction at all greater Worcester (Massachusetts) medical centers in five biennial periods between 1995 and 2003. RESULTS: The average age of our study population was 70 years, 59% were men, and the average glucose level at the time of hospital admission was 149 mg/dl. Approximately one-third of patients presented with glucose levels<120 mg/dl, whereas one-quarter had serum glucose levels>or=160 mg/dl. Patients in the uppermost quintiles of serum glucose were significantly more likely to develop heart failure and cardiogenic shock, and die during hospitalization than patients with lower serum glucose levels. Patients with the highest glucose levels were less aggressively treated with effective cardiac medications and coronary interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this population-based investigation provide insights into the magnitude and impact of hyperglycemia in patients not known to have prior diabetes who are hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Increased surveillance and more aggressive treatment strategies are needed to improve the outlook of patients with elevated serum glucose levels.     

Hospital outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To assess hospital mortality and morbidity in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction and to compare the results between the two groups. METHODS: All patients admitted in 1999 to the intensive care unit of the Schwabing City Hospital with diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction were assessed for hospital mortality and co-morbidity. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty patients with acute myocardial infarction were admitted. Of those, 126 (38%) were diabetic and 204 (62%) were non-diabetic patients. Mortality within 24 h after admission was 13.5% in diabetic patients and 5.4% in non-diabetic patients (P<0.01). Mortality during entire hospitalization was higher in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients (29.4% vs. 16.2%; P=0.004). Diabetic patients were resuscitated more frequently than non-diabetic patients (24% vs. 11%, P<0.01). In diabetic patients, heart rate at admission was increased (91 +/- 27 vs. 82 +/- 23/min; P<0.01) and presence of angina pectoris was reported less frequently (59% (n=72) vs. 82% (n=167); P<0.001). Preceding myocardial infarction, microalbuminuria, peripheral artery disease and arterial hypertension were more frequent in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients. Diabetic patients demonstrated higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels than non-diabetic patients (91.4 +/- 78.2 mg/l vs. 45.2 +/- 62.4 mg/l; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, early hospital mortality is increased and signs of cardiac autonomic dysfunction and microangiopathy are detected more frequently than in non-diabetic patients. The need for advanced treatment strategies early in the course of diabetic patients with myocardial infarction is emphasized.     

Is admission hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction a surrogate for previously undiagnosed abnormal glucose tolerance?

AIMS: To investigate whether admission hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a surrogate for previously undiagnosed abnormal glucose tolerance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred non-diabetic patients with AMI were divided into three groups: 81 patients with admission glucose < 7.8 mmol/L (group 1), 83 patients with admission glucose > or = 7.8 mmol/L and < 11.1 mmol/L (group 2), and 36 patients with admission glucose > or = 11.1 mmol/L (group 3). Abnormal glucose tolerance, diabetes, or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) was diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). OGTT identified diabetes in 53 patients (27%) and IGT in 78 patients (39%). When the fasting glucose criteria were applied, however, only 14 patients (7%) were diagnosed as having diabetes. The prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance was similar among the three groups: 67% in group 1, 63% in group 2, and 69% in group 3 (P = 0.74). The relation of fasting glucose (r2 = 0.50, P < 0.001) and HbA1c (r2 = 0.34, P < 0.001) to 2-h post-load glucose was significant, but the relation of admission glucose to 2-h post-load glucose was not significant (r2 = 0.02, P = 0.08). Multivariable analysis showed that fasting glucose and HbA1c were independent predictors of abnormal glucose tolerance, but admission glucose was not. CONCLUSION: Admission hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic patients with AMI does not represent previously undiagnosed abnormal glucose tolerance. Fasting glucose and HbA1c, rather than admission glucose, may be useful to predict abnormal glucose tolerance. However, these parameters lacked sensitivity. OGTT should be considered in all non-diabetic patients with AMI.     

Under utilisation of evidence-based treatment partially explains for the unfavourable prognosis in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: The prognosis after an acute myocardial infarction is worse for patients with diabetes mellitus than for those without. We investigated whether differences in the use of evidence-based treatment may contribute to the differences in 1-year survival in a large cohort of consecutive acute myocardial infarction patients with and without diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We included patients below the age of 80 years from the Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive care Admissions (RIKS-HIA), which included all patients admitted to coronary care units at 58 hospitals during 1995-1998. In all 5193 patients had the combination of acute myocardial infarction and diabetes mellitus while 20440 had myocardial infarction but no diabetes diagnosed. Multivariate logistical regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of diabetes mellitus on the use of evidence-based treatment and its association with survival during the first year after the index hospitalisation. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 20.3% (males 18.5%; females 24.4%). The 1-year mortality was substantially higher among diabetic patients compared with those without diabetes mellitus (13.0 vs. 22.3% for males and 14.4 vs. 26.1% for female patients, respectively) with an odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) in three different age groups: <65 years 2.65 (2.23-3.16); 65-74 years 1.81 (1.61-2.04) and >75 years 1.71 (1.50-1.93). During hospital stay patients with diabetes mellitus received significantly less treatment with heparins (37 vs. 43%; p<0.001), intravenous beta blockade (29 vs. 33%; p<0.001), thrombolysis (31 vs. 41%; p<0.001) and acute revascularisation (4 vs. 5%; p<0.003). A similar pattern was apparent at hospital discharge. After multiple adjustments for dissimilarities in baseline characteristics between the two groups, patients with diabetes were significantly less likely to be treated with reperfusion therapy (OR 0.83), heparins (OR 0.88), statins (OR 0.88) or to be revascularised within 14 days from hospital discharge procedures (OR 0.86) while the use of ACE-inhibitors was more prevalent among diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic patients (OR 1.45). The mortality reducing effects of evidence-based treatment like reperfusion, heparins, aspirin, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering treatment and revascularisation were, in multivariate analyses, of equal benefit in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. INTERPRETATION: Diabetes mellitus continues to be a major independent predictor of 1-year mortality following an acute myocardial infarction, especially in younger age groups. This may partly be explained by less use of evidence-based treatment although treatment benefits are similar in both patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Thus a more extensive use of established treatment has a potential to improve the poor prognosis among patients with acute myocardial infarction and diabetes mellitus.     

Coronary risk factors in newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed type 2 diabetic men with myocardial infarction

Risk factors for coronary artery disease in 131 known non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetic patients is compared to that in 115 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic subjects and in 316 non-diabetic patients. The subjects, all Indian men aged 21-60 years, represent consecutive survivors of myocardial infarction and were investigated 3-4 months after their acute episode. A group of 524 healthy Indian men aged 21-60 years were included as controls. Significant differences in parameters measured were noted when all diabetic and non-diabetic patients were compared to the control group. Diabetic patients were older than the non-diabetic patients and with significantly higher frequency of hypertension and hypertriglyceridaemia, whilst smoking and family history of coronary artery disease were elicited more frequently in the non-diabetic patients. Mean concentrations of serum total cholesterol and lipoproteins in the diabetic and non-diabetic men were similar, whereas serum triglyceride concentrations were significantly higher in the diabetic patients. Newly diagnosed and known diabetic patients did not differ with respect to the risk factors examined. Clusters of various combinations of hypertension, obesity, hypertriglyceridaemia and low HDL-cholesterol values were encountered more frequently in diabetic patients when compared to non-diabetic patients, whilst no significant differences were observed when the two groups of diabetic subjects were compared. In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that in men with myocardial infarction there are significant differences between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with respect to certain risk factors. However, newly diagnosed diabetic men have similar risk profiles to their known diabetic counterparts.     

Role of previous treatment with sulfonylureas in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from a nationwide French registry

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular effects of sulfonylureas (SU) in diabetic patients are controversial and it has been suggested that diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction while on SU were at increased risk. OBJECTIVES: To assess the in-hospital outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction according to the use of SU at the time of the acute episode. METHODS: Of 443 intensive care units in France, 369 (83%) prospectively collected all cases of infarction admitted within 48 h of symptom onset in November 2000. RESULTS: Among the 2320 patients included in the registry, 487 (21%) had diabetes, of whom 215 (44%) were on SU. Patients on SU were older and had a more frequent history of hyperlipidemia than those not receiving SU. Type and location of infarction were similar in the two groups, and there was no difference in Killip class on admission. In-hospital mortality was lower in patients on SU (10.2%) than in those without SU (16.9%) (p = 0.035). There was a trend toward less frequent ventricular fibrillation (2.3% vs 5.9%, p = 0.052). In two models of multivariate analyses, SU therapy was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (model 1: relative risk: 0.44, p = 0.012; model 2: relative risk: 0.37, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide registry reflecting real-world practice, the use of sulfonylureas in diabetic patients was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality.     

The value of admission glycosylated hemoglobin level in patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND:

Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level on admission is a prognostic factor for mortality in patients with and without diabetes after myocardial infarction. In the present study, the authors examined the relationship between admission HbA1c level and myocardial perfusion abnormalities in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS:

One hundred consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated with thrombolytic therapy were included in the present prospective study. Blood glucose and HbA1c levels of all patients were measured within 3 h of admission. Patients were divided into three groups according to HbA1c level: 4.5% to 6.4% (n=25), 6.5% to 8.5% (n=28) and higher than 8.5% (n=47). All patients then underwent exercise thallium-201 imaging and coronary angiography to determine ischemic scores and the number of diseased coronary arteries four weeks after admission.

RESULTS:

Seven patients died within the four-week follow-up period. There was a significant relationship between admission HbA1c level and mortality (P=0.009). Furthermore, there was a significant relationship between HbA1c level and total ischemic scores in patients with acute myocardial infarction (r=0.482; P=0.001). Ischemic scores increased as HbA1c levels increased in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results demonstrated that admission plasma glucose and HbA1c levels are prognostic factors associated with mortality after acute myocardial infarction.     

Plasminogen activator inhibitor: a risk factor for myocardial infarction in diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE--To determine whether diabetic patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction have impaired fibrinolytic activity due to raised plasminogen activator inhibitor compared with non-diabetic patients. SETTING--A district general hospital. PATIENTS--90 non-diabetic and 38 diabetic patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS--Both plasminogen activator inhibitor activity and antigen were significantly higher in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients (24.7 (6.8) v 18.5 (6.8) AU/ml; p = 0.0001 and 64.2 (range 13.1 to 328.8) v 38.5 (range 10.9 to 173.7 ng/ml; z = 3.3; p = 0.0008) with a positive correlation between activity and antigen (rs = 0.51; p = 0.0001). In both groups, activity and antigen concentrations were significantly higher than in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects without coronary artery disease (p = 0.002 to 0.0001 for each comparison). Plasminogen activator inhibitor activity correlated significantly with admission plasma glucose (r = 0.32; p = 0.0001), glycated haemoglobin (r = 0.32; p = 0.0001), admission plasma insulin (rs = 0.48; p = 0.001), and Killip grade of heart failure both on admission (rs = 0.27; p = 0.001) and on discharge (rs = 0.22; p = 0.006), but not with cumulative creatine kinase MB isoenzyme release (rs = -0.08). There were similar but weaker correlations between tissue plasminogen activator antigen and admission plasma glucose, glycated haemoglobin, and insulin. In 18 patients (12 non-diabetic and six diabetic) plasminogen activator inhibitor activity was measured between six and 12 months (8.3 (1.6)) after the acute infarct and remained similar to activity on admission (24.8 (1.9) AU/ml (NS) for diabetic and 17.9 (6.9) AU/ml (NS) for non-diabetic patients) and was still significantly higher in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION--These results show that diabetic patients have higher plasminogen activator inhibitor activity than non-diabetic patients both on admission with acute myocardial infarction and at follow up six to 12 months later. Raised plasminogen activator inhibitor activity may predispose diabetic patients to myocardial infarction and may also impair pharmacological and spontaneous reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction thus contributing to the poor outcome in these subjects.     

Treatment of patients with myocardial infarction who present with a paced rhythm

BACKGROUND: A paced rhythm can mask the electrocardiographic features of an acute myocardial infarction, complicating timely recognition and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate characteristics, treatment, and outcomes among patients presenting with paced rhythms during myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: U.S. acute care hospitals. PATIENTS: 102 249 Medicare beneficiaries at least 65 years of age who were treated for acute myocardial infarction between 1994 and 1996. MEASUREMENTS: Provision of three treatments for acute myocardial infarction (emergent reperfusion, aspirin, and beta-blockers), death at 30 days, and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: 1954 patients (1.9%) presented with paced rhythms during myocardial infarction. These patients were older; were predominantly male; and had higher rates of congestive heart failure, diabetes, and previous infarction. They were significantly less likely to receive emergent reperfusion (relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.33]), aspirin (RR at admission, 0.91 [CI, 0.88 to 0.94]; RR at discharge, 0.87 [CI, 0.83 to 0.92]), and beta-blockers at admission (RR, 0.89 [CI, 0.82 to 0.96]). In addition, there was a trend toward decreased use of beta-blockers at discharge (RR, 0.91 [CI, 0.76 to 1.06]). Crude mortality rates were higher among patients with paced rhythms than among those without at 30 days (25.8% vs. 21.3%; P = 0.001) and at 1 year (47.1% vs. 36.1%; P = 0.001). Among patients with paced rhythms, risk for death at 30 days decreased after adjustment for illness severity and decreased use of therapy (RR, 1.03 [CI, 0.93 to 1.14]). Patients with paced rhythms remained at additional risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.12 [CI, 1.06 to 1.18]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with paced rhythms were less likely than those without to receive treatment for acute myocardial infarction and had poorer short- and long-term outcomes. However, this mortality risk diminished after adjustment for treatment. This suggests that improved recognition and treatment of myocardial infarction may improve outcomes, particularly in the short term.