Comparison of Outcomes between Robot‐Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single‐Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

ObjectiveTo compare the safety and effectiveness of robot‐assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis‐TLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of single‐level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS).MethodsThis is a retrospective study. Between April 2018 and April 2020, a total of 61 patients with single‐level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and treated with robot‐assisted OLIF (28 cases, 16 females, 12 males, mean age 50.4 years) or robot‐assisted Mis‐TLIF (33 cases, 18 females, 15 males, mean age 53.6 years) were enrolled and evaluated. All the pedicle screws were implanted percutaneously assisted by the TiRobot system. Surgical data included the operation time, blood loss, and length of postoperative hospital stay. The clinical and functional outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog scores (VAS) for back and leg pain, complication, and patient''s satisfaction. Radiographic outcomes include pedicle screw accuracy, fusion status, and disc height. These data were collected before surgery, at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.ResultsThere were no significantly different results in preoperative measurement between the two groups. There was significantly less blood loss (142.4 ± 89.4 vs 291.5 ± 72.3 mL, P < 0.01), shorter hospital stays (3.2 ± 1.8 vs 4.2 ± 2.5 days, P < 0.01), and longer operative time (164.9 ± 56.0 vs 121.5 ± 48.2 min, P < 0.01) in OLIF group compared with Mis‐TLIF group. The postoperative VAS scores and ODI scores in both groups were significantly improved compared with preoperative data (P < 0.05). VAS scores for back pain were significantly lower in OLIF group than Mis‐TLIF group at 1 week (2.8 ± 1.2 vs 3.5 ± 1.6, P < 0.05) and 3 months postoperatively (1.6 ± 1.0 vs 2.1 ± 1.1, P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference at further follow‐ups. ODI score was also significantly lower in OLIF group than Mis‐TLIF group at 3 months postoperatively (22.3 ± 10.0 vs 26.1 ± 12.8, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of clinically acceptable screws between the two groups (97.3% vs 96.2%, P = 0.90). At 1 year, the OLIF group had a higher interbody fusion rate compared with Mis‐TLIF group (96.0% vs 87%, P < 0.01). Disc height was significantly higher in the OLIF group than Mis‐TLIF group (12.4 ± 3.2 vs 11.2 ± 1.3 mm, P < 0.01). Satisfaction rates at 1 year exceeded 90% in both groups and there was no significant difference (92.6% for OLIF vs 91.2% for Mis‐TLIF, P = 0.263).ConclusionRobot‐assisted OLIF and Mis‐TLIF both have similar good clinical outcomes, but OLIF has the additional benefits of less blood loss, less postoperative hospital stays, higher disc height, and higher fusion rates. Robots are an effective tool for minimally invasive spine surgery.     

Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Between Upper Fibular Curvature and Non‐Curvature with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis Following Proximal Fibular Osteotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Minimum 2‐Year Follow‐up

ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) in treating medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients with upper fibular curvature and non‐curvature.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed. From January 2016 to January 2017, a total of 51 patients (nine males and 42 females) at a mean age of 63.7 years (range 48–79 years) with medial KOA who underwent PFO procedure at the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University were included in the study. The patients were divided into the two groups, namely curvature group (28 patients, six males and 22 females, aged 62.6 ± 7.7 years) and non‐curvature group (23 patients, three males and 20 females, aged 64.5 ± 7.6 years). Perioperative parameters and Kellgren‐Lawrence classification were recorded and analyzed in the two groups, respectively. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months at the first year of post‐operation, and then every 6 months from the second year of post‐operation. A telephone survey with standard questionnaire survey, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scoring system, was used to evaluate postoperative clinical outcomes. Radiological results were assessed using the femorotibial angle (FTA), hip‐knee‐ankle angle (HKA), and settlement value of medial tibial platform (MTP) in the two groups.ResultsThe average follow‐up periods of the curvature group and the non‐curvature group were 34.8 ± 6.1 and 33.9 ± 5.4 months, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups of demographic data in terms of number of patients, age, body mass index (BMI), gender, KOA side, and Kellgren‐Lawrence classification (P > 0.05). The VAS scores of the curvature group and non‐curvature group were (3.53 ± 1.62 vs 3.68 ± 1.43 at 1 month, 3.46 ± 0.79 vs 3.57 ± 0.66 at 3 months, and 2.43 ± 0.88 vs 2.83 ± 0.94 at 6 months, both P > 0.05), while significant differences were found from 12 months post‐operation (1.54 ± 0.72 vs 2.03 ± 0.85 at 12 months, and 1.04 ± 0.69 vs 1.74 ± 0.75 at 24 months, both P < 0.05). The HSS scores of the curvature group and non‐curvature group were (79.67 ± 5.14 vs 78.25 ± 6.37 at 1 month, 84.65 ± 3.76 vs 83.18 ± 3.64 at 3 months, and 86.27 ± 3.13 vs 85.49 ± 3.25 at 6 months, both P > 0.05), while significant differences were found from 12 months post‐operation (90.64 ± 4.32 vs 87.71 ± 5.63 at 12 months, and 92.93 ± 2.07 vs 90.06 ± 2.08 at 24 months, both P < 0.05). In addition, the FTA and settlement value of the curvature group were lower than the non‐curvature group (177.18 ± 1.52 vs 178.35 ± 1.86, and 5.29 ± 1.74 vs 6.49 ± 2.09, both P < 0.05) while the HKA were higher than the non‐curvature group (175.32 ± 2.34 vs 173.83 ± 2.64, P < 0.05) at the final follow‐up.ConclusionsMedial KOA patients with upper fibular curvature is an optimal surgical indication for PFO surgery, with the advantages of pain relief, better functional recovery, and alignment correction.     

Corresponding Changes of Autophagy‐Related Genes and Proteins in Different Stages of Knee Osteoarthritis: An Animal Model Study

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of autophagy expression levels of different weight‐bearing states and different stages of osteoarthritis in animal models, as well as the corresponding mechanisms.MethodsWe used the male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats (12‐week‐old, SPF) to establish the OA animal models by modified Hulth method, and grouped animal models according to the length of time after surgery and different weight‐bearing areas. RT‐qPCR was carried out for detection of autophagy‐related genes such as Atg7, Atg12, P62, etc. Western blot analysis was used to detect the expression levels of corresponding autophagy‐related proteins such as LC3B, P62, etc. T test was performed for statistical analysis to compare different groups, while the differences were deemed statistically significant with P < 0.05. Transmission electron microscopy was used to observe the autophagosome to demonstrate the level of autophagy expression and the status of the chondrocytes.ResultsThe results of the RT‐qPCR testing showed that when the weight‐bearing cartilage of the 4‐week group (relatively mild) was compared with that of the 10‐week group (relatively severe), there were statistically significant differences in all the genes tested, in detail: Atg3 (P < 0.01), Atg7 (P < 0.01), Atg12 (P < 0.01), P62 (P < 0.0001). The expression of autophagy‐related mRNA in the 4‐week group is increased compared with that of the 10‐week group. As for the expression of proteins, Western blotting showed that in the comparison between the 4‐ and the 10‐week groups, statistically significant results include Atg12 (P < 0.01) in the non‐weight‐bearing area, with decreased autophagy in the 10‐week group compared with that of the 4‐week group, while expression of LC3B (P < 0.05) protein was significantly higher in the 4‐week group than in the control in the non‐weight‐bearing area. The expression of LC3B (P < 0.0001) and P62 (P < 0.05) in the 10‐week group were higher than that of the control. Transmission electron microscope showed that autophagy in the weight‐bearing area is stronger than that in the non‐weight‐bearing area, and autophagy in the 4‐week group is stronger than in the 10‐week group for the weight‐bearing area.ConclusionsThe expression of autophagy varies during different stages of osteoarthritis, in which the autophagy is stronger in the early stage of osteoarthritis, and gradually decreases with the progression of the disease. Autophagy in different weight‐bearing areas may also be different.     

Non‐Anatomical Arthroscopic All‐Inside Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear to Posterior Cruciate Ligament for Patients with Normal Lower Limb Alignment

ObjectiveTo describe a non‐anatomical arthroscopic all‐inside repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) to posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) technique for patients with normal lower limb alignment and to evaluate the short‐term clinical and radiologic outcomes.MethodsMMPRT directly to PCL was repaired with all‐inside horizontal mattress suturing technique rather than by the transtibial pullout suture technique or anchor suturing repair technique in 20 Laparade Type II MMPRT patients with normal lower limb alignment during 2018–2019. The clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated retrospectively for at least 2 years follow‐up. The VAS score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity score were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow‐up. The status of the medial meniscus posterior root were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preoperatively and at the final follow‐up.ResultsTwenty patients (mean age 54.5 ± 19.5 years) were included in the present study. The mean follow‐up duration was 32.5 ± 5.8 months. The VAS score was significantly decreased from preoperative 6.5 ± 1.5 to 2.1 ± 1.4 at the final follow‐up (P < 0.01). The mean Lysholm score was significantly improved from 43.7 ± 10.9 preoperatively to 85.7 ± 10.8 (P < 0.01). The median Tegner activity score was improved from 1.0 (range 1–4) to 3.0 (range 2–4, P < 0.01). On MRI, a total of 12 cases (60%) had complete healing, while eight cases (40%) had partial healing.ConclusionNon‐anatomical arthroscopic all‐inside repair of MMPRT to PCL may yield beneficial clinical outcomes and a higher rate of clinical healing in Type II MMPRT patients with normal lower limb alignment. It is an easy and reliable alternative technique to the transtibial pullout suture or anchor suture repair technique.     

Comparing the Bridge‐Type Zero‐Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI‐C) Interbody Fusion Cage System and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with Plating and Cage System in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy and radioactivity of the bridge‐type zero‐profile anchored spacer (ROI‐C) interbody fusion cage and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating and cage system (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).MethodsThis is a retrospective contrastive study. We recruited 35 patients who received ROI‐C (ROI‐C group) and 34 patients who received ACDF (ACDF group), between January 2014 to January 2019, at our treatment center. The ROI‐C group comprised of 11 males and 24 females with a mean age of 61.59 ± 8.21 years (range, 51–71 years). The ACDF group comprised of 12 males and 22 females with a mean age of 60.15 ± 7.52 years (range, 52–74 years). Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA), Odom''s score, cervical Cobb angle, fusion rate, adjoining ossification, and dysphagia.ResultsA total of 69 patients met the inclusion criteria, and these patients received more than two years of follow‐up. There were significant differences in surgical duration (101 ± 22 min vs. 118 ± 29 min) and blood loss (102 ± 46 ml vs. 145 ± 58 ml) between two groups (P < 0.05). The JOA and NDI of these two groups of patients significantly improved, when compared with those before the operation (P < 0.05). Twenty‐nine of 35 patients in the ROI‐C group and 27 of 34 patients in ACDF group achieved good or excellent outcomes according to Odom''s criteria. The cervical lordosis of both two groups significantly increased, when compared with those before the operation (P < 0.05). In the ROI‐C group, the postoperative fusion rate was 85.7% at the 3‐month follow‐up and 100% at the final follow‐up. In the ACDF group, the postoperative fusion rate was 82.4% at the 3‐month follow‐up and 100% at the final follow‐up. The dysphagia incidence of the ACDF group was higher than that of the ROI‐C group postoperatively and at the one month after surgery (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in the incidence of dysphagia at final follow‐up (P > 0.05).ConclusionBoth ROI‐C and ACDF achieved good therapeutic effects. However, ROI‐C can reduce the operation time and postoperative complications.     

Adverse Tissue Reactions and Metal Ion Behavior After Small‐Head Metasul Hip Arthroplasty: A Long‐Term Follow‐Up Study

ObjectiveTo investigate the long‐term survivorship, incidence of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD), and metal ion behavior in patients who underwent small‐head Metasul metal‐on‐metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsBetween February 1998 and September 2003, a retrospective study was performed on 43 consecutive patients (43 hips) who underwent unilateral cementless Metasul MoM THAs at our institution. Of them, 35 patients (nine males and 26 females) who were available for follow‐up more than 15 years after THA were enrolled in this study and underwent metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MARS‐MRI) to identify ARMD. The mean age at surgery of the patients was 59.7 years old (range, 31–83). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical examinations were conducted using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Serum cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ion levels and Co/Cr ratio were assessed at different postoperative periods of <5, 5–10, 11–14, and ≥15 years.ResultsThe mean follow‐up period for the 35 patients included was 18.1 years (range, 15–22). The mean HHS significantly improved from 44.6 ± 11.3 points preoperatively to 89.4 ± 7.9 points at the final follow‐up (P < 0.0001). ARMD was found in 20% of the patients using MARS‐MRI. No signs of stem loosening were found clinically or radiographically, whereas cup loosening and ARMD were observed in three patients (9%), for whom revision THAs were performed. The Kaplan–Meier survival rates with revision for any reason as the endpoint were 90.9% at 5 years, 84.8% at 10 years, 84.8% at 15 years (95% CI, 67.1–93.6), and 70.3% at 20 years (95% CI, 43.6–87.0). The survival rates with revision for ARMD as the endpoint were 100% at 5 years, 96.6% at 10 years, 96.6% at 15 years (95% CI, 77.2–99.7), and 80.1% at 20 years (95% CI, 45.3–95.2). Serum Co ion level peaked at 5–10 years after THA, which was significantly higher than that <5 years; however, it decreased to the initial level after 15 years. In contrast, serum Cr ion level significantly increased at 5–10 years and then remained almost constant. Significant differences in Cr ion levels (1.0 vs 2.0 μg/L, P = 0.024) and Co/Cr ratio (1.3 vs 0.9, P = 0.037) were found between non‐ARMD and ARMD patients at >11 years postoperatively.ConclusionOur results suggest that increased Cr ion levels and decreased Co/Cr ratio may be signs of ARMD in patients who underwent small‐head Metasul MoM THA.     

Incidence and Risk Factors of In‐Hospital Prosthesis‐Related Complications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database Study

ObjectiveTo examine the incidence and risk factors of in‐hospital prosthesis‐related complications (PRCs) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a large‐scale national database.MethodsA retrospective database analysis was performed based on Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2005–2014. Patients who underwent TKA were included. The recruited cases were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of PRCs. Patient demographics (age, sex, and race), hospital characteristics (type of admission and payer, and bedsize, teaching status, location, and region of hospital), length of stay (LOS), total charges during hospitalization, in‐hospital mortality, comorbidities, and perioperative complications were analyzed.ResultsA total of 1,227,244 TKAs were captured from the NIS database. There were 8484 cases of in‐hospital PRCs after TKA and the overall incidence was 0.69%, with a slight downward trend annually. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was the main category among PRCs (0.20%), followed by mechanical loosening (0.04%), dislocation (0.02%), and periprosthetic fracture (PPF) (0.01%). Patients suffered from in‐hospital PRCs were 3 years younger (64 years vs 67 years) and 6.51% more likely to be male (43.60% vs 37.09%) compared to the nonaffected population (P < 0.0001). Additionally, patients experiencing in‐hospital PRCs after TKA were 2.11% less likely through elective admission (92.07% vs 94.18%) while 2.34% more likely in teaching hospital (45.53% vs 43.19%) than those without these complications (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the occurrence of in‐hospital PRCs was associated with longer LOS (4 days vs 3 days; P < 0.0001), more total charges ($53,418 vs $41,204, P < 0.0001), and higher in‐hospital mortality (0.30% vs 0.07%; P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors of in‐hospital PRCs after TKA which included younger age, male, non‐elective admission, teaching hospital, deficiency and chronic blood loss anemia, coagulopathy, congestive heart failure, depression, diabetes with chronic complications, fluid and electrolyte disorders, pulmonary circulation disorders, metastatic cancer, and weight loss. Besides, in‐hospital PRCs after TKA were associated with secondary osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, prior knee arthroscopy, acute renal failure, acute myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, transfusion, and wound dehiscence.ConclusionIt is beneficial to study the risk factors of in‐hospital PRCs after TKA to ensure the appropriate management and optimize consequences although a relatively low incidence was identified.     

The Z‐plasty contributes to the coalescence of a chronic non‐healing wound

This study aimed to explore the treatment effect of Z‐plasty on a non‐healing wound. A total of 72 patients diagnosed with a chronic non‐healing wound in Peking University Third Hospital from November 2009 to August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Among them, 27 patients were treated with Z‐plasty, and 45 patients were treated with the general method. Detailed patient information was retrieved from medical records, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), alcohol, smoking, and comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart disease). Surgical parameters included operation time and intraoperative blood loss. Wound swelling, epidermal blisters, wound edge colour, and skin temperature at 1 day after surgery were assessed to evaluate the blood supply of the wound. Surgical complications included infection, haematoma, dehiscence, and non‐healing within 2 weeks postoperatively. Student t test (for continuous data) and Chi‐square test (for categorical data) were conducted to determine the statistical difference. We found no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, alcohol, smoking, and comorbidities between the two groups. Z‐plasty did not show any advantages in the surgical time, invasive blood loss, hospital days, and hospitalisation expenses. The incidence of abnormal wound edge colour with Z‐plasty was significantly lower than that with the general treatment (P < .05), and the Z‐plasty enables better healing of the patient''s wound (P < .05). Z‐plasty promoted better recovery of chronic non‐healing wounds than direct suturing.     

Repair Versus Non‐Repair of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament in Elbow Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability Treatment: A Comparative Study

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of repairing and not repairing the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) when surgically treating elbow varus posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI).MethodsIn this retrospective study spanning June 2014 to February 2019, 24 patients with elbow PMRI who were treated surgically were assigned to group RL (Repair LUCL) or group NL (Non‐repair LUCL) depending on whether the LUCL was repaired. Hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and related complications were reviewed. The elbow range of motion (ROM), the visual analog scale (VAS), the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score were used for functional assessment.ResultsAmong the 24 patients with PMRI, 15 were assigned to group RL and nine were assigned to group NL. The mean blood loss (184.66 ± 20.3 vs 207.33 ± 19.447, P < 0.001), the operation time (98.88 ± 12.693 min vs 184.66 ± 20.3 min, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in group RL compared to group NL. There were no significant differences between the two groups in time until surgery and follow‐up time (6.66 ± 1.838 vs 6.11 ± 1.900 days, 25.53 ± 2.099 vs 26.11 ± 2.891 months, P = 0.577, P = 0.486). All of the patients achieved bone union. The elbow flexion‐extension ROM (122.00° ± 3.162°vs 121.11° ± 3.333° at 12 months, P = 0.520) and pronation‐supination ROM (154.53° ± 3.335° vs 155.55° ± 4.639° at 12 months, P = 0.537). Both groups achieved similar results in MEPS score (90.53 ± 2.695 vs 89.77 ± 3.865, P = 0.578) and DASH (9.77 ± 1.897 vs 9.99 ± 1.550, P = 0.772) score at the final follow‐up. And the MEPS score revealed excellent results (87% in group RL, 89% in group NL).The VAS scores decreased significantly in group RL (from 6.13 ± 0.990 to 1.93 ± 0.593) and group NL (from 5.77 ± 1.481 to 1.88 ± 0.781), and no significant differences in preoperative or final follow‐up were observed between the two groups (P = 0.487, P = 0.876). Complications observed in group NL with one patient occurred cubital tunnel syndrome 3 months after the operation, the patient underwent ulnar nerve simple neurolysis and the symptoms were relieved after 3 weeks.ConclusionFor patients with elbow PMRI, satisfactory functional outcomes can be yielded with non‐repair of the LUCL as long as the stable elbow joint is performed during operation.     

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Transforaminal Approach Combined with Interlaminar Approach for L4/5 and L5/S1 Two‐Level Disc Herniation

ObjectiveThe purpose of the present study was to discuss a new surgical strategy that combines percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) with percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) for L4/5 and L5/S1 two‐level disc herniation.MethodsThis was a retrospective study. A total of 19 patients with L4/5 and L5/S1 two‐level lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in our hospital from January 2015 to June 2016 were retrospectively examined. The average age of these 19 patients was 42.21 ± 14.88 years old, including 12 men and 7 women. One experienced surgeon who had carried out more than 3000 lumbar surgeries performed PELD for these patients. During the PELD surgery, the transforaminal approach was adopted for L4/5 level disc herniation and the interlaminar approach was adopted for L5/S1 level disc herniation. The demographic data, operation time (min), fluoroscopy times, hospital stay (days), and complications were recorded and analyzed. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the surgical outcomes. MRI was conducted to evaluate the radiographic improvement.ResultsAll patients underwent PELD via the transforaminal approach combined with the interlaminar approach successfully and achieved satisfactory efficacy. The follow‐up points were 3, 12, and 18 months. The average hospital stay (days) and the average follow up (months) were 3.32 ± 0.98 and 18.63 ± 3.84, respectively. The operation time and fluoroscopy times were 85.79 ± 12.90 min and 39.05 ± 4.59 times, respectively. The fluoroscopy times (frequency) for L4/5 and L5/S1 were 26.95 ± 6.41 and 12.11 ± 3.49 (t = 7.00, P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference for fluoroscopy times between male and female patients (t = 0.89, P = 0.99). The preoperative back pain (VAS‐Back) and the last follow‐up VAS‐Back were 5.58 ± 2.01 and 2.37 ± 1.01, respectively (t = 7.14, P < 0.05). The preoperative leg pain (VAS‐Leg) and the last follow‐up VAS‐Leg were 7.00 ± 1.56 and 1.63 ± 1.01, respectively (t = 20.97, P < 0.05). There were significant differences between preoperative VAS‐Back and the last follow‐up VAS‐Back in men (t = 4.61, P < 0.05) and women (t = 6.57, P < 0.05). In addition, there was significant differences between preoperative VAS‐Leg and the last follow‐up VAS‐Leg in men (t = 13.48, P < 0.05) and women (t = 26.87, P < 0.05). There were significant differences between preoperative ODI scores (44.84 ± 10.82%) and the last follow‐up ODI scores (11.12 ± 5.80%) (t = 10.92, P < 0.05). Preoperative ODI scores and the last follow‐up ODI scores were significantly different for men (t = 8.80, P < 0.05) and women (t = 6.63, P < 0.05). All patients received significant pain relief and functional improvement after the surgery. Except for two cases of postoperative dysesthesia and one dural tear, no severe complications occurred. The dysesthesia symptoms of these two patients disappeared within 1 week with the application of dexamethasone and neurotrophic drugs and the dural tear case also recovered well as the dural laceration was small. No poor results were reported and 89.47% of patients achieved excellent or good recovery.ConclusionPercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the transforaminal approach combined with the interlaminar approach under epidural anesthesia can treat L4/5 and L5/S1 two‐level disc herniation safely and effectively.     

Oxidative Stress Induced Osteocyte Apoptosis in Steroid‐Induced Femoral Head Necrosis

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect and mechanism of Glucocorticoids (GCs) induced oxidative stress and apoptosis on necrosis of the femoral head in patients and rats.MethodsEight patients with steroid‐induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head (SINFH) and eight patients with developmental dysplasia of the hips (DDH) were enrolled in our study. In animal model, twenty male Sprague‐Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups (SINFH group and NS group). The SINFH model group received the methylprednisolone (MPS) injection, while control group was injected with normal saline (NS). MRI was used to confirm SINFH rat model was established successfully. Then, the rats were sacrificed 4 weeks later and femoral head samples were harvested. Histopathological staining was preformed to evaluate osteonecrosis. TUNEL staining was performed with 8‐OHdG and DAPI immunofluorescence staining to evaluate oxidative injury and osteocyte apoptosis. Immunohistochemistry staining was used to detect Nox1, Nox2, and Nox4 protein expression.ResultsMRI showed signs of typical osteonecrosis of femoral head in SIHFH patients. Histopathological staining showed that the rate of empty lacunae in SINFH patients was significantly higher (56.88% ± 9.72% vs 19.92% ± 4.18%, T = −11.04, P < 0.001) than that in DDH patients. The immunofluorescence staining indicated that the TUNEL‐positive cell and 8‐OHdG‐positve cell in SINFH patients were significantly higher (49.32% ± 12.95% vs 8.00% ± 2.11%, T = −7.04, P = 0.002, 54.6% ± 23.8% vs 9.75% ± 3.31%, T = −4.17, P = 0.003) compared to the DDH patients. The immunohistochemistry staining showed that the protein expression of NOX1, NOX2 and NOX4 in SINFH patients were significantly increased (64.50% ± 7.57% vs 37.58% ± 9.23%, T = −3.88, P = 0.018, 90.84% ± 2.93% vs 49.56% ± 16.47%, T = −5.46, P = 0.001, 85.46% ± 9.3% vs 40.69% ± 6.77%, T = −8.03, P = 0.001) compared to the DDH patients. In animal model, MRI showed signs of edema of femoral head in MPS group, which represents SINFH rat model was established successfully. Histological evaluation showed the rate of empty lacunae in MPS group was significantly higher (25.85% ± 4.68% vs 9.35% ± 1.99%, T = −7.96, P < 0.001) than that in NS group. The immunofluorescence staining indicated that the TUNEL‐positive cell and 8‐OHdG‐positve cell (in MPS group were significantly increased (31.93% ± 1.01% vs 11.73% ± 1.16%, T = −32.26, P < 0.001, 47.59% ± 1.39% vs 22.07% ± 2.45%, T = −22.18, P < 0.001) compared to the NS group. The immunohistochemistry staining showed that the expression of NOX2 in MPS group was significantly increased (76.77% ± 8.34% vs 50.32% ± 10.84%, T = −4.74, P = 0.001) compare with NS group.ConclusionOur findings indicated that GC‐induced NOXs expression may be an important source of oxidative stress, which could lead to osteocyte apoptosis in the process of SINFH     

Knee Scores of Patients with Non‐Lateral Compartmental Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Mobile,Fixed‐Bearing Unicompartmental Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate knee scores and clinical efficacies of patients with non‐lateral unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) who randomly underwent mobile‐bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), fixed‐bearing (FB) UKA, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsFrom September 2015 to February 2017, a prospective, randomized, parallel, single‐center trial of 180 patients (78 males and 102 females; 63.3 ± 6.9 years) with non‐lateral compartmental knee OA was performed in the first author‐affiliated hospital. The patients were randomly divided into three groups (each group included 60 patients) and received medial cemented Oxford phase 3 MB UKA, medial cemented Link FB UKA, or cemented DePuy Sigma PFC TKA, respectively. A similar perioperative management and fast‐track surgery program was carried out for all patients. The knee scores at 3‐year follow‐up after operation and clinical efficacies of these three groups of patients were recorded, investigated, and compared.ResultsPrimarily, compared to the TKA group, the UKA groups (MB UKA and FB UKA) had shorter operative time (median 63.2 < 67.1 min), less bleeding (8.6 < 30.0 mL), earlier resumption of walking without crutches (3.0 < 8.0 days) and walking up and down the stairs (5.0 < 10.0 days) (P < 0.001), higher FJS scores (78.0 > 74.5) (P = 0.007), better results in all knee scores (except VAS and KSS function scores) (P < 0.05), and a larger maximum flexion angle of the knee at the 3‐year follow‐up (123.0° > 96.0°) (P = 0.001). Secondarily, compared to the TKA group, the MB UKA group showed better results in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index (WOMAC) stiffness (83.6 > 79.6), WOMAC total (86.3 > 83.2), Oxford knee score (OKS) (20.0 < 23.0), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (78.5 > 74.5), and a larger maximum flexion angle of the knee (123.0 > 96.0) (P < 0.05). Moreover, the FB UKA group showed higher Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) (91.0 > 88.5), WOMAC stiffness (84.3 > 79.6), WOMAC function (85.2 > 81.7), WOMAC total scores (87.6 > 83.2), and a larger maximum flexion angle of the knee (119.0° > 96.0°) than the TKA group (P < 0.05). Overall, there was no significant difference in all knee scores and maximum flexion angles of the knee for the MB UKA and FB UKA groups (P > 0.05). There was one case with original bearing dislocation in MB UKA group. One patient with displacement of the femoral component caused by a fall injury, and another patient, who lost his life in a car accident, were involved in the FB UKA group. There was an infection case and an intermuscular vein thrombosis case in TKA group.ConclusionUKA showed more advantages than TKA; however, there was no significant difference between the MB UKA and FB UKA groups for treatment of non‐lateral compartmental knee OA.     

Comparison of Tri‐Lock Bone Preservation Stem and the Conventional Standard Corail Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between the Tri‐Lock Bone Preservation Stem (BPS) and the conventional standard Corail stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsFrom March 2012 to May 2014, we retrospectively reviewed 84 patients (104 hips) who received Tri‐Lock (BPS) and 84 patients (115 hips) who received conventional standard Corail stem in THA. Their mean ages were 53.12 ± 2.32 years and 52.00 ± 2.11 years, respectively. The clinical outcomes were assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS). The radiological outcomes were evaluated by the radiological examination. Accordingly, Intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed as well.ResultsThe mean follow‐up time was 48.23 ± 2.91 months in the Tri‐Lock (BPS) group and 49.11 ± 2.11 months in the Corail group, respectively. The bleeding volumes in two groups were comparable (169.22 ± 58.11 mL vs 179.30 ± 59.14 mL, P = 0.003), with more bleeding volume in Corail group patients, while no statistically significance with respect to operation time was observed (65.41 ± 6.24 min vs 63.99 ± 6.33 min, P = 0.567). The rates of intraoperative fracture was 8% for the Corail group while 1% for the Tri‐Lock (BPS) group (8% vs 1%, P = 0.030). At final follow‐up, no statistical differences in regard to HHS, WOMAC, and Pain VAS were revealed between the two groups (P > 0.05). The rate of thigh pain was higher in Corail group than in Tri‐lock (BPS) group (5% vs 0%, P = 0.043). However, incidence of stress shielding in grade 1 was higher in Tri‐Lock (BPS) than in the Corail group (76% vs 23%, P < 0.01), while those in grade 2 and 3 were lower compared to the Corail stem (15% vs 28%, P < 0.01; 9% vs 16%, P = 0.008, respectively). Intriguingly, other assessments in relation to radiographic outcomes and postoperative complications were not comparable between the two groups. The Kaplan–Meier survival rate (revision surgery performed for any reason was defined as the end point) was similar between the two groups (P = 0.57), with 98.8% (95% confidence interval, 92.3%–100%) in Tri‐lock (BPS) group and 97.6% (95% confidence interval, 94.6%–100%) in Corail group.ConclusionsThe Tri‐Lock (BPS) has similar clinic performances compared to the Corail stem. Furthermore, the Tri‐lock (BPS) stem has some advantages in achieving lower incidence of thigh pain, stress shielding and intra‐operative fracture. Therefore, we recommend the Tri‐lock (BPS) stem as a good alternative in primary total hip arthroplasty, especially taking into account patient factors, including bone deficiency and convenience of extraction of the stem in hip revision.     

Posteromedial Corner Release with the Knee in Figure‐of‐Four Position vs Conventional Position for Varus Knee Arthroplasty

ObjectiveTo introduce posteromedial corner release with the knee in the figure‐of‐four position versus the conventional position for varus knee arthroplasty.MethodsThis is a retrospective study. From March 2015 to September 2019, a series of 123 patients (139 knees) with varus knee were randomly and blindly allocated to experimental group (60 patients; 68 knees) and control group (57 patients; 65 knees). Patients in experimental group underwent posteromedial corner release with the knee in the figure‐of‐four position; and patients in control group with the knee in the conventional position. If soft tissue balance was not completely achieved or the medial gap was still tight, an additional loosening technique were used to achieve symmetric medial and lateral space in both groups. Time for soft tissue balancing was defined as the time from the start of the spacer test to the end of the balance test. Length of release was defined as the distance from the osteotomy surface of the tibial plateau to the farthest structures released. The rating system of Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score was used to evaluate the clinical results. Quantitative variables were described as mean and standard deviation, and compared by one‐way analysis of variance.ResultsThe mean age of experimental group and control group was 70.2 ± 8.7 years and 68.7 ± 6.2 years, respectively (P > 0.05). Preoperatively, the mean HSS score of the groups was 38.2 ± 11.3 and 39.1 ± 10.7, respectively (P > 0.05). The mean varus knee angle was 19.7° ± 9.3° and 19.3° ± 10.7°, respectively (P > 0.05). The mean time for soft tissue balancing was 8.4 ± 3.3 min and 11.3 ± 6.9 min in experimental and control group, respectively (P < 0.05). The mean length of releasing posteromedial corner structures was 35.5 ± 13.4 mm and 27.3 ± 9.7 mm in experimental and control group, respectively (P < 0.05). Additional special loosening techniques were performed in eight knees in experimental group and seven knees in control group. The HSS scores 5 years after surgery were 95.1 ± 16.9 and 94.8 ± 17.2 respectively (P > 0.05). No complications were found during the follow‐up time, and the clinical symptoms were observed to be significantly improved in the patients.ConclusionThe posteromedial corner can be released more extensively and thoroughly when the knee is placed in the figure‐of‐four position during varus knee arthroplasty.     

Validation of CT‐Based Three‐Dimensional Preoperative Planning in Comparison with Acetate Templating for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the accuracy of CT‐based preoperative planning with that of acetate templating in predicting implant size, neck length, and neck cut length, and to evaluate the reproducibility of the two methods.MethodsThis prospective study was conducted between August 2020 and March 2021. Patients who underwent elective primary total hip arthroplasty by a single surgeon were assessed for eligibility. The included patients underwent both acetate templating and CT‐based planning by two observers after the operation. Each observer conducted both acetate templating and CT‐based planning twice for each case. The outcome measures included the following: (1) the accuracy of surgical planning in predicting implant size, calcar length, and neck length, which was defined as the difference between the planned size and length and the actual size and length; (2) reproducibility of the two planning techniques, which were assessed by inter‐observer and intra‐observer reliability analysis; (3) the influence of potential confounding factors on planning accuracy, which was evaluated using generalized estimating equations.ResultsA total of 57 cases were included in the study. CT‐based planning was more accurate than acetate templating for predicting cup size (93% vs 79%, p < 0.001) and stem size (93% vs 75%, p < 0.001). When assessed by mean absolute difference, the comparison between acetate templating and CT‐based planning was 4.28 mm vs 3.74 mm (p = 0.122) in predicting neck length and 3.05 mm vs 2.93 mm (p = 0.731) in predicting neck cut length. In the inter‐observer reliability analysis, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.790 was achieved for predicting cup size, and an ICC of 0.966 was achieved for predicting stem size using CT‐based planning. In terms of intra‐observer reliability, Observer 1 achieved an ICC of 0.803 for predicting cup size and 0.965 for predicting stem size in CT‐based planning. Observer 2 achieved ICC values of 0.727 and 0.959 for predicting cup and stem sizes, respectively. The average planning time was 6.48 ± 1.55 min for CT‐based planning and 6.12 ± 1.40 min for acetate templating (p = 0.015).ConclusionThe CT‐based planning system is more accurate than acetate templating for predicting implant size and has good reproducibility in total hip arthroplasty.     

Influence of Cage Design on Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in Dorsal Lumbar Spinal Fusions: A Comparison of Lordotic and Non‐Lordotic Cages

ObjectivesTo evaluate the comparison between lordotic and non‐lordotic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages in degenerative lumbar spine surgery and analyze radiological as well as clinical outcome parameters in long‐term follow up.MethodsIn a retrospective study design, we compared 37 patients with non‐lordotic cage (NL‐group) and 40 with a 5° lordotic cage (L‐group) implanted mono‐ or bi‐segmental in TLIF‐technique from 2013 to 2016 and analyzed radiological parameters of pre‐ and postoperative (Lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), and pelvic tilt (PT), as well as clinical parameters in a follow‐up physical examination using the Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland–Morris Score (RMS), and visual analog scale (VAS).ResultsSurgery was mainly performed in lower lumbar spine with a peak in L4/5 (mono‐segmental) and L4 to S1 (bi‐segmental), long‐term follow‐up was on average 4 years postoperative. According to the literature, we found significantly better results in radiological outcome in the L‐group compared to the NL‐group: LL increased 6° in L‐group (51° preoperative to 57° postoperative) and decreased 1° in NL‐group (50° to 49° (P < 0.001). Regarding SL, we found an increase of 5° in L‐group (13° to 18°) and no difference in NL‐group (15°)(P < 0.001). In PT, we found a clear benefit with a decrease of 2° in L‐group (21° to 19°) and no difference in NL‐group (P = 0.008).In direct group comparison, ODI in NL‐group was 23% vs 28% in L‐group (P = 0.25), RMS in NL‐group was 8 points vs 9 points in L‐group (P = 0.48), and VAS was in NL‐group 2.7 vs 3.2 in L‐group (P = 0.27) without significant differences.However, the clinical outcome in multivariate analysis indicated a significant multivariate influence across ODI and RMS of BMI (Wilks λ = 0.57, F [4, 44] = 3.61, P = 0.012) and preoperative SS (Wilks λ = 0.66, F [4, 44] = 2.54, P = 0.048). Age, gender, cage type and postoperative PT had no significant influence (P > 0.05). Intraoperatively, we saw three dura injuries that could be sutured without problems and had no consequences for the patient. In the follow‐up, we did not find any material‐related problems, such as broken screws or cage loosening, also no pseudarthrosis.ConclusionIn conclusion, we think it''s not cage design but other influenceable factors such as correct indication and adequate decompression that lead to surgical success and the minimal difference in the LL therefore seemed to be of subordinate importance.     

The Application of H‐Loop in Arthroscopic Knotless Double‐Row Rotator Cuff Repairs

ObjectiveTo determine the functional outcomes after a novel method of H‐loop knotless double‐row technique in patients with rotator cuff tears.MethodFrom June 2020 to September 2020, a total of six patients (five women, one man) with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the H‐loop knotless double‐row technique were enrolled in our study. The average age is 54 years (range: 50–61 years). The preoperative and final follow‐up clinical outcome were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale (VAS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and Constant–Murley score. The active shoulder range of motion (ROM) was also collected preoperatively and postoperatively at the final follow‐up (forward flexion and abduction). Accordingly, intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed as well.ResultThere were six patients that underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the H‐loop knotless double‐row technique. The average follow‐up period was 7.52 ± 0.70 months. The VAS, UCLA, ASES, and Constant–Murley scores improved from 5 ± 2.45, 15.67 ± 3.44, 47.67 ± 17.41 and 49.17 ± 8.98 preoperatively, to 0.83 ± 0.75, 36.27 ± 3.83, 91.67 ± 10.76 and 85.83 ± 4.31 at the final follow‐up, with statistical significances of P = 0.009, P < 0.001, P = 0.006, and P = 0.001, respectively. Meanwhile, the active shoulder ROM (forward flexion and abduction) improved from 135.00 ± 46.80 and 125 ± 56.48 preoperatively, to 173.67 ± 4.13 and 172 ± 3.27 at final follow‐up, respectively (P = 0.082, P = 0.088). During the follow‐up, there were no postoperative complications such as wound‐site infection, nerve or vessel damage, subcutaneous hematoma, and suture anchor problems.ConclusionWith the benefit of reducing the possibility of strangulation and blood supply affection for the rotator cuff, The H‐loop knotless double row technique may be an alternative method to significantly improve subjective functional outcomes and increase the healing rate of medium‐sized rotator cuff tears with degeneration issues and poor tissue quality.     

Arthroscopic Modified Double‐Row Biceps Tenodesis versus Labral Repair for the Treatment of Isolated Type II SLAP Lesions in Non‐Overhead Athletes

ObjectiveTo evaluate the postoperative efficacy and the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic modified double‐row biceps tenodesis versus labral repair.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in 56 patients with isolated type II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions from March 2015 to November 2018. Thirty patients (male:female = 17:13) were treated with labral repair, and 26 patients (male:female = 15:11) were treated with modified double‐row biceps tenodesis. The average age of the labral repair group and the modified double‐row biceps tenodesis group were 42.8 ± 10.6 and 40.9 ± 10.2 years, respectively. Pre‐ and postoperative assessments with the visual analog scale (VAS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were compared between the two treatment groups. Additional outcome measures included patient satisfaction, the time to return to previous activities, workers'' compensation status, and postoperative complications.ResultsAt a 2‐year follow‐up, the tenodesis group showed significant differences in postoperative VAS (1.5 to 1.8, respectively; p = 0.008), patient satisfaction (92.3% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001), and recovery time to return to their previous activities (6.8 ± 1.8 vs. 8.1 ± 1.5, p = 0.007) compared to the labral repair group; however, there was no significant difference in postoperative ASES and UCLA scores between the two groups. Additionally, one patient in the tenodesis group developed persistent postoperative stiffness, which was resolved by conservative treatment. In the labral repair group, two patients presented with persistent postoperative night pain, three developed persistent postoperative stiffness, and two required a subsequent capsular release.ConclusionsCompared with the labral repair group, the arthroscopic modified double‐row biceps tenodesis showed more encouraging postoperative pain reduction, earlier recovery to previous activities, and higher patient satisfaction.     

A Comparative Analysis of Femoral Neck System and Three Cannulated Screws Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Six‐Month Follow‐Up

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacies of Femoral Neck System (FNS) and the three cannulated screws fixation (3CS) as therapeutic options for femoral neck fractures.MethodThis was a retrospective study involving 69 patients (26 males and 43 females; mean age of 54.9 years (range, 28–66 years)) subjected to either FNS or 3CS for femoral neck fracture therapy. These patients were treated in our hospital from October 2019 to May 2020. Patient follow up was done at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months. During the short‐term (6 months) follow‐up period, surgical procedures for the two groups and incidences of complications were analyzed. Perioperative parameters were recorded and analyzed. Postoperative hip joint functions were measured and compared using the Harris score. The assessed perioperative parameters included surgical time, hemoglobin loss, fluoroscopy duration, hospitalization length and hospitalization cost. The main complications at last follow‐up (6 months) included varus tilting, femoral neck shortness, and implant removal.ResultsDifferences in the number of patients, age, Garden type of fracture and time from injury to surgery between the two groups were not significant (P > 0.05). With regards to perioperative parameters, compared to 3CS, FNS treatment performed better in surgical time (60.00 ± 12.44 vs 76.81 ± 13.10 min, P = 0.000), blood loss (13.67 ± 8.02 vs 16.58 ± 4.16 g/L, P = 0.059) and fluoroscopy time (39.73 ± 9.57 vs 58.14 ± 9.15 s, P = 0.000). Differences in hospitalization length and cost between the groups were not significant (P > 0.05). During the whole follow‐up period, all patients did not exhibit dysfunction, pulmonary embolism or even death as a result of long‐term immobilization of affected limbs. Surgical incisions for all patients healed well without infections. During the 6‐month follow‐up period, the FNS group exhibited a higher Harris score (84.61 ± 3.42 vs 78.67 ± 3.72, p = 0.000). In addition, treatment‐associated complications (FNS vs 3CS) included femoral neck varus tilt (3.03% vs 11.11%), femoral neck shortness (6.06% vs 13.89%), and implant removal (0% vs. 13.89%). Implant removal rate for the FNS group was significantly less than that of the 3CS group (P = 0.026). Differences in incidences of femoral neck varus tilt (P = 0.196) and femoral neck shortness (P = 0.282) between the two groups were not significant. However, the difference in number was significant (FNS group was less).ConclusionFNS treatment is associated with a smaller surgical trauma, stronger stability, and reductions in post‐operative complication incidences, therefore, it is a potential therapeutic option for femoral neck fractures.