A randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of treatment with montelukast on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-4, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) in children with asthma

BACKGROUND: Anti-inflammatory properties of leukotriene modifiers and their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness have not been studied in children with asthma. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the changes in serum levels of inflammatory mediators, clinical efficacy, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness after treatment with montelukast. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 39 children with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma were randomly allocated to receive montelukast or placebo for 6 weeks. Main outcome measures were changes in serum concentrations of soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-4, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1); peripheral blood eosinophil count; and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP). Asthma severity score, FEV(1), and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) for histamine were secondary end points. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, serum concentrations of IL-4, sICAM-1, and ECP and eosinophil blood counts significantly decreased after 6 weeks of treatment with montelukast. Montelukast significantly improved asthma control and FEV(1). Montelukast resulted in within-group significant decrease in levels of serum sIL-2R (611 vs. 483 pg/mL), IL-4 (0.123 vs 0.102 pg/mL), sICAM-1 (280 vs. 244 ng/mL), and ECP (74 vs. 59 microg/mL) and in eosinophil blood counts (349 vs. 310 cells/mm(3)). Mean FEV(1) value changed from 85% of predicted to 95% (P <.001) and for histamine (PC(20)H) from 2.8 mg/mL to 3.8 mg/mL (P <.001) after treatment with montelukast. There was no significant difference between montelukast and placebo recipients in the serum concentrations of sIL-2R and PC(20)H after treatment. CONCLUSION: Montelukast provides clinical benefit to patients with chronic asthma and decreases bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Montelukast caused a statistically significant decrease of serum concentrations in cytokine, ICAM-1, and ECP and peripheral blood eosinophil counts over the 6-week treatment period. This observation raises the possibility that leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast, may have effects on parameters of asthmatic inflammation.     

Effect of montelukast on symptoms and exhaled nitric oxide levels in 7- to 14-year-old children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Cysteinyl leukotrienes have been found to exert potent inflammatory effects in the upper airways and play a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis. Previous studies have reported increased levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) in patients with allergic rhinitis without asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of treatment with montelukast on symptoms, eNO levels, and peripheral eosinophil counts of children with seasonal allergic rhinitis during pollen season. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study performed between April and June 2005 in 57 children aged 7 to 14 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis was performed. The study comprised a 1-week screening period, a 1-week run-in period, and a 2-week treatment period with once daily montelukast, 5 mg, or matching placebo. RESULTS: No significant difference at baseline was found in symptom scores, eNO levels, and blood eosinophil counts between the treatment and placebo groups. After 2 weeks of montelukast treatment, improvements from the baseline in the daytime nasal, composite, and daytime eye symptoms scores were significantly greater in the montelukast group compared with the placebo group (P < .001, P < .001, and P < .01, respectively). A significant decrease was also found in eosinophil counts (P < .001) in the montelukast group compared with the placebo group after treatment. Montelukast treatment did not produce a significant effect on eNO levels compared with placebo (P = .96). CONCLUSION: Montelukast treatment provided significant improvement in symptoms and peripheral eosinophil counts of school-age children with seasonal allergic rhinitis; however, it did not show a significant effect on eNO levels.     

The effect of montelukast (MK-0476), a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, on allergen-induced airway responses and sputum cell counts in asthma

BACKGROUND: Cysteinyl leukotrienes are capable of inducing chemotaxis of eosinophils in vitro and within the airways of animals and humans in vivo. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that montelukast (MK-0476), a potent cysLT1 receptor antagonist, would protect against allergen-induced early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic responses by virtue of anti-inflammatory properties. Hence, we studied the effect of pretreatment with oral montelukast on allergen-induced airway responses. As an exploratory endpoint, changes in inflammatory cell differentials and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were evaluated in hypertonic saline-induced sputum. METHODS: Twelve asthmatic men (20-34 years, FEV1 79-109% predicted, histamine PC20FEV1 <4 mg/mL) with dual responses to inhaled house dust mite extract participated in a two-period, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Three oral doses of montelukast (10 mg) or matching placebo were administered 36 and 12 h before, and 12 h post-allergen. The airway response to allergen was measured by FEV1, and the EAR and LAR were expressed as the corresponding areas under the time-response curves (AUC0-3 h and AUC3-8h, respectively). During each study period, sputum was induced with 4.5% NaCl 24 h before and 24 h after a standardized allergen challenge. Processed whole sputum cytospins were stained with Giemsa, and cell counts expressed as percentage nonsquamous cells. ECP was measured by FEIA in sputum supernatants. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. The changes in baseline FEV1 were not significantly different between the two pretreatments (P = 0.183). Montelukast significantly inhibited the EAR and LAR, reducing the AUC0-3h by 75.4% (P<0.001) and the AUC3-8h by 56.9% (P = 0.003) as compared with placebo. Sputa of nine subjects could be included in the analysis (<80% squamous cells). Allergen challenge significantly increased sputum eosinophils after placebo (mean change +/- SD: 4.8 +/- 5.8%, P = 0.038), with a similar trend after montelukast (mean change +/- SD: 4.1 +/- 5.4%; P = 0.056). The allergen-induced changes in sputum eosinophils and ECP, however, were not significantly different between the two pretreatments (P = 0.652 and P = 0.506, respectively). CONCLUSION: We conclude that oral montelukast protects against allergen-induced early and late airway responses in asthma. However, using the present dosing and sample size, this protection was not accompanied with changes in sputum eosinophil percentage or activity, which may require more prolonged pretreatment with cysLT1 receptor antagonists.     

Anti-inflammatory effects of montelukast in mild cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated inflammation contributes to progressive pulmonary damage in cystic fibrosis (CF). Sputum cysteinyl leukotriene levels, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) are significantly related to disease severity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory and clinical effects of the cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast in children with CF. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, crossover design was used. Patients received montelukast (6 to < or = 14 years, 5 mg; > 14 years, 10 mg) or placebo as a once-daily tablet for 21 days and then, after a washout period of at least 4 weeks, crossed over to receive the alternative treatment. Blood and native nasal fluid were taken on days 1 and 21 of each treatment block, and WBC count, ECP, and IL-8 were analyzed using a chemiluminescent immunometric assay. RESULTS: Sixteen CF patients (10 boys, 6 girls; age, 5 to 18 years, median 9.5 years) completed the trial. There was a significant (P < or = 0.02) reduction of serum ECP (median reduction: montelukast 7.7 microg/L vs placebo 0.15 microg/L) and eosinophils (P < or = 0.027; median reduction: montelukast 85/microL vs placebo 0/microL). There was no significant change in nasal ECP, IL-8, or serum IL-8 after a 21-day course of montelukast. Clinical symptom scores did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast reduces eosinophilic inflammation in CF patients. Multicenter trials providing more patients to create more data to prove the hypothesis that montelukast is an effective tool to cut down disease severity in CF patients are needed.     

Effects of montelukast and beclomethasone on airway function and asthma control

BACKGROUND: Maintaining asthma control is a major objective of therapy. Traditionally, the effectiveness of asthma therapy has been judged primarily by its effect on airway function rather than on multiaspect asthma control. OBJECTIVE: An inhaled corticosteroid and a leukotriene receptor antagonist were compared to determine whether they provided equivalent effects, as judged by days of asthma control. METHODS: In a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, asthmatic patients (n = 782) with FEV(1) percent predicted values of between 50% and 85% and a weekly average beta-agonist use of more than 2 puffs per day were randomized to receive montelukast (10 mg daily), beclomethasone (200 microg twice daily), or placebo treatment for 6 weeks in a double-dummy fashion. We examined the distribution of the primary end point: percentage of days of asthma control. Secondary end points included FEV(1), albuterol use, occurrence of an asthma attack, asthma flare-up, rescue corticosteroid use, sustained asthma control, and adverse experiences. RESULTS: The percentage of days of asthma control was almost identical between the montelukast and beclomethasone groups (98% overlap in the distribution). Montelukast was at least equal to beclomethasone, and both were greater than placebo on the basis of frequency of asthma attacks, asthma flare-ups, and rescue corticosteroid use. Beclomethasone had a greater effect than montelukast and both treatments were better than placebo at improving FEV(1). CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast was as effective as beclomethasone, as judged by indices of clinical control other than FEV(1). When evaluating the outcome of montelukast therapy, FEV(1) might underestimate clinical effectiveness.     

Effects of montelukast treatment on clinical and inflammatory variables in patients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: In cystic fibrosis (CF), the inflammatory process contributes to progressive lung tissue damage. Cysteinyl leukotrienes have been found in the sputum of patients with CF at high concentrations sufficient to cause potent biological effects. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of anti-inflammatory treatment with montelukast sodium in patients with CF. METHODS: Twenty-six patients aged 6 to 18 years were recruited to this 20-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Patients received montelukast or placebo for 8 weeks in addition to their regular CF treatment. Before and after treatment, findings from spirometry, whole-body plethysmography, and the clinical wheezing and cough scales were evaluated. At the same time, serum and sputum samples were obtained for the measurement of eosinophil cationic protein, interleukin 10 (IL-10), IL-8, and myeloperoxidase levels. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients completed the study. Compared with placebo use, montelukast treatment significantly improved forced expiratory volume in I second, peak expiratory flow, and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% and significantly decreased cough and wheezing scale scores (P < .001 for all). There were no significant changes in vital capacity, thoracic gas volume, airway resistance, and residual volume after treatment. Compared with placebo use, montelukast treatment decreased serum and sputum levels of eosinophil cationic protein and IL-8, decreased sputum levels of myeloperoxidase, and increased serum and sputum levels of IL-10 (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast may have measurable anti-inflammatory properties in patients with CF.     

A randomized, double‐blind trial of the effect of glucocorticoid, antileukotriene and bβ‐agonist treatment on IL‐10 serum levels in children with asthma

BACKGROUND: Levels of an immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 are reduced in asthmatic airways, potentially contributing to more intense inflammation. Triamcinolone has anti-inflammatory properties and the anti-inflammatory effects of montelukast and formoterol have been discussed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the effect of treatment with triamcinolone, montelukast and formoterol on the serum level of IL-10, eosinophil blood counts, eosinophil cationic response (ECP) and clinical parameters (symptom score, FEV1 and PC20H) in children with moderate asthma. METHODS: An 8-week, placebo-controlled and randomized, double-blind trial was carried out. The subjects were 91 children with moderate atopic asthma who were allergic to dust mite. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 400 microg triamcinolone (n = 19), 5 or 10 mg (according to age) montelukast (n = 18), 24 microg formoterol (n = 18) or placebo (n = 36). RESULTS: Seventy-nine children completed the study. After treatment with triamcinolone and montelukast the level of IL-10 in blood serum significantly increased, eosinophil blood counts and ECP levels significantly decreased and all clinical parameters improved; treatment with formoterol had no effect on IL-10 level, eosinophil blood counts in serum and bronchial hyper-reactivity; ECP level significantly decreased after treatment and asthma symptoms and FEV1 improved significantly. Mean IL-10 levels in serum before and after treatment with triamcinolone were 7.23 pg/mL with 95% CI, 6.74 -7.72% and 14.24 pg/mL with 95% CI, 11.6-16.88%, respectively (P < 0.001); with montelukast they were 6.59 pg/mL with 95% CI, 6.26-7.23% and 10.94 pg/mL with 95% CI, 8.24-12.65%, respectively (P < 0.002); with formoterol they were 7.06 pg/mL with 95% CI, 6.61-7.52% and 7.04 pg/mL with 95% CI, 6.15-7.93%. We found statistically significant correlations between serum level of IL-10 and serum level of ECP after treatment with triamcinolone and montelukast. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that one possible way by which triamcinolone and montelukast contribute to inhibition of inflammation is by increasing IL-10 levels.     

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of montelukast for treating perennial allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) is a persistent allergic inflammation of the upper respiratory tract due to year-round allergen exposure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast for the treatment of PAR. METHODS: Protocol 265 was a 2-arm study performed during the winter. After a placebo run-in period, adults with perennial allergen sensitivity and active symptoms of PAR were randomized to receive 10 mg of montelukast (n=1002) or placebo (n=990) once daily during a 6-week, double-blind, active-treatment period. The primary end point was the daytime nasal symptoms score, defined as the average of scores for nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and sneezing rated daily by patients. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in PAR symptoms were seen in patients treated with montelukast. Their daytime nasal symptoms scores were reduced during treatment compared with those of the placebo group: the difference between treatments in least squares mean change from baseline was -0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.12 to -0.04; P < .001). Montelukast treatment also improved global evaluations of allergic rhinitis by patients and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores: differences vs the placebo group were -0.15 (95% CI, -0.27 to -0.04; P < .01) and -0.15 (95% CI, -0.24 to -0.06; P < .001), respectively. Other end points that showed statistically significant improvement with montelukast treatment were nighttime symptoms and each of the 4 nasal symptoms (congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching). The treatment effects of montelukast were stable and persistent during the entire 6 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Montelukast provided statistically significant relief of PAR symptoms during 6 weeks of treatment.     

Randomized controlled trial evaluating the clinical benefit of montelukast for treating spring seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of allergic rhinitis are mediated in part by cysteinyl leukotrienes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical benefit of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, administered once daily for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study enrolled 1,214 healthy, nonsmoking outpatients aged 15 to 85 years with spring allergic rhinitis, positive skin test to a spring allergen, and predefined daytime nasal symptoms. After a 3- to 5-day placebo run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with montelukast 10 mg (n = 522), loratadine 10 mg (n = 171), or placebo (n = 521) once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks. During the run-in and treatment periods, symptoms were evaluated in a daily diary using a 0 (best) to 3 (worst) scale. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of randomized patients were clinically similar in the three treatment groups. Montelukast was significantly more effective than placebo (P = 0.003) in improving the daytime nasal symptoms score (difference in least square means, -0.09; 95% confidence interval, -0.16, -0.03) averaged over 2 weeks of therapy. The treatment effect of montelukast was significantly greater (P < 0.05), relative to placebo, for all secondary endpoints, including nighttime symptoms and daytime eye symptoms, patient and physician global evaluations of allergic rhinitis, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. Loratadine, which served as a positive control, was significantly more effective than placebo for most endpoints, validating the study results. Both montelukast and loratadine were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Therapy with montelukast significantly improves assessments of symptom severity as well as quality-of-life parameters for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

Comparative efficacy and anti-inflammatory profile of once-daily therapy with leukotriene antagonist or low-dose inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines advocate the use of preventative anti-inflammatory therapy for mild persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and anti-inflammatory profiles of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and a low dose of inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma. METHODS: Twenty-one adult patients with mild asthma received 4 weeks of either once-daily inhaled hydrofluoroalkane triamcinolone acetonide (450 microg/day ex-actuator dose) or oral montelukast (10 mg/day) in a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded crossover study. Measurements were made before and after 2 and 4 weeks of each treatment. RESULTS: At the endpoint (after 4 weeks), triamcinolone and montelukast had improved the primary outcome (provocative dose of methacholine required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1)) in comparison with placebo (P <.05), there being no difference between the treatments (1.09-fold; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.63). Triamcinolone was better than placebo or montelukast for effects on all other surrogate inflammatory markers (P <.05), including exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophils, serum eosinophil cationic protein, plasma intracellular circulating adhesion molecule 1, and plasma E-selectin. Both treatments improved (P <.05) morning and evening peak flow, nighttime beta2-agonist use, and symptoms in comparison with placebo, though triamcinolone was better than montelukast (P <.05) with regard to peak flow. Triamcinolone produced suppression (P <.05) of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine and serum osteocalcin. CONCLUSION: Once-daily inhaled corticosteroid and leukotriene antagonist improved the primary outcome variable of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a similar degree.     

Comparisons of the complementary effect on exhaled nitric oxide of salmeterol vs montelukast in asthmatic children taking regular inhaled budesonide.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled, long-acting beta2-agonists or antileukotrienes are alternatives as add-on therapy for asthmatic children taking regular inhaled steroids. Any complementary effects would be relevant to the choice between these alternatives. Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) may reflect these effects. OBJECTIVE: To compare the control of FeNO provided by salmeterol or montelukast add-on therapy in asthmatic children undergoing regular maintenance treatment with a daily dose of 400 microg of budesonide. METHODS: The study included children with increased FeNO despite regular treatment with budesonide, 400 microg/d, and normal lung function. Montelukast, 5 mg/d, salmeterol, 50 microg twice daily, or placebo was compared as add-on therapy to budesonide, 400 microg, in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. RESULTS: Twenty-two children completed the trial. The geometric mean FeNO level was 20 ppb (95% confidence interval [CI], 15-27 ppb) after salmeterol, which was significantly higher than after montelukast (mean, 15 ppb; 95% CI, 11-18 ppb; P = 0.002) and placebo (mean, 15 ppb; 95% CI, 10-21 ppb; P = 0.03). There was no difference in FeNO between the montelukast and placebo groups. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was significantly increased after salmeterol (mean, 2.63 L; 95% CI, 2.34-2.91 L) compared with placebo (mean, 2.48 L; 95% CI, 2.19-2.77 L). Montelukast (mean, 2.57 L; 95% CI, 2.33-2.80 L) was no different than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The FeNO levels were significantly higher after salmeterol add-on treatment compared with both placebo and montelukast add-on treatment. Salmeterol significantly improved lung function (FEV1) compared with placebo and nonsignificantly compared with montelukast. Montelukast failed to reduce FeNO and improve lung function compared with placebo in this group of children taking regular budesonide, 400 microg.     

A randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of treatment with formoterol on clinical and inflammatory parameters of asthma in children.

BACKGROUND: In addition to their bronchodilating effect, long-acting inhaled beta-agonists have recently been shown to have some anti-inflammatory properties. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of formoterol on inflammatory mediators in children. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 34 children, aged 6 to 18 years, with moderate atopic asthma, were randomly allocated to receive formoterol or matching placebo for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint of this study was to determine changes in serum levels of inflammatory markers after treatment with formoterol; secondary endpoints included clinical efficacy and bronchial hyperreactivity. The following parameters were measured: symptom score, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) for histamine and peripheral blood eosinophil count, serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), soluble receptor of interleukin-2 (sIL-2R), level of interleukin-4 (IL-4), level of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and immunoglobulin E (IgE) level before and after treatment. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, treatment with formoterol significantly improved lung function. The mean value of FEV1 changed from 74% of predicted value before treatment to 80% of predicted value after treatment (P < 0.001). The mean concentration of eosinophil blood count before and after treatment was 379 and 310 cells/mm3 (P = 0.035); ECP was 93 and 83 mcg/L; and serum IL-4 was 0.13 and 0.11 pg/mL (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference between formoterol and placebo recipients in PC20H, and serum concentration of sIL-2R, sICAM-1, or IgE after treatment. The group that received formoterol showed improvement in pulmonary function as measured by FEV1 (P < 0.001), and PC20H (P = 0.04) after 4 weeks of treatment. These patients also showed improvement of clinical symptoms (P < 0.001). Serum marker measurements in the formoterol group showed decreased concentrations of eosinophil blood count, ECP, and IL-4, but there was no difference in before and after measurements of sIL-2R, sICAM-1, and IgE. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that formoterol has measurable anti-inflammatory properties and can diminish asthma symptoms and bronchial hyperreactivity.     

Effect of montelukast on lung function and clinical symptoms in patients with cystic fibrosis

Inflammatory process contributes to progressive lung tissue damage in cystic fibrosis (CF). Cysteinyl leukotrienes have been found in the sputum of CF patients at concentrations sufficient to cause potent biological effect. This study was designed to assess the effect of anti-inflammatory treatment with montelukast sodium in CF patients. Twelve patients, aged 6-29 were recruited. It was 20 week, placebo-controlled, and randomized, double blind, crossover trial. At first and last week of each treatment course spirometry and whole body plethysmography parameters (FEV1, PEF, FEF25/75%, VC, TGV, Raw and RV) and clinical wheezing and cough scale were measured. In montelukast group significant improvement in FEV1 (mean +/- SD, 54.6 +/- 22.6 before and 62 +/- 19.0 after treatment, p=0.0112) and FEF25/75% (28.9 +/- 23.0 before and 37.5 +/- 25.5 after treatment, p=0.0053) were observed. Compared with placebo montelukast significantly improved FEV1 (p=0.0032), PEF (p=0.0298) and FEF25/75% (p=0.0091). There was no significant difference in VC, TGV, Raw and RV. Montelukast compared with placebo significantly decreased cough (p<0.0001) and wheezing (p=0.0002) score. In summary, therapy with montelukast may provide clinical benefit to patients with CF.     

Comparison of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and oral montelukast for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have directly compared the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroids with that of leukotriene receptor antagonists for the treatment of daytime and nighttime symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). OBJECTIVE: To compare fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, 200 microg daily, with oral montelukast, 10 mg daily, for the relief of SAR symptoms. METHODS: Patients with SAR 15 years or older were randomized to receive either fluticasone propionate (n = 367) or montelukast (n = 369) in this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The primary efficacy measure was the mean change from baseline in daytime total nasal symptom scores (TNSSs) (the sum of 4 daytime individual nasal symptom scores [INSSs] assessing nasal congestion, itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing), averaged across weeks 1 and 2. Secondary efficacy measures included the 4 daytime INSSs, nighttime TNSSs (the sum of 3 nighttime INSSs assessing congestion on awakening, difficulty going to sleep, and nighttime awakenings), and the 3 nighttime INSSs averaged across weeks 1 and 2. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline in daytime TNSSs (P < .001), all daytime INSSs (P < .001), nighttime TNSSs (P < .001), and all nighttime INSSs (P < or = .02) showed significant differences favoring fluticasone propionate over montelukast across 2 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Compared with montelukast, fluticasone propionate provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime SAR symptoms.     

Characterization of within-subject responses to fluticasone and montelukast in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND: Responses to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) vary among asthmatic patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether responses to ICSs and LTRAs are concordant for individuals or whether asthmatic patients who do not respond to one medication respond to the other. METHODS: Children 6 to 17 years of age with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma were randomized to one of 2 crossover sequences, including 8 weeks of an ICS, fluticasone propionate (100 microg twice daily), and 8 weeks of an LTRA, montelukast (5-10 mg nightly depending on age), in a multicenter, double-masked, 18-week trial. Response was assessed on the basis of improvement in FEV 1 and assessed for relationships to baseline asthma phenotype-associated biomarkers. RESULTS: Defining response as improvement in FEV 1 of 7.5% or greater, 17% of 126 participants responded to both medications, 23% responded to fluticasone alone, 5% responded to montelukast alone, and 55% responded to neither medication. Compared with those who responded to neither medication, favorable response to fluticasone alone was associated with higher levels of exhaled nitric oxide, total eosinophil counts, levels of serum IgE, and levels of serum eosinophil cationic protein and lower levels of methacholine PC(20) and pulmonary function; favorable response to montelukast alone was associated with younger age and shorter disease duration. Greater differential response to fluticasone over montelukast was associated with higher bronchodilator use, bronchodilator response, exhaled nitric oxide levels, and eosinophil cationic protein levels and lower methacholine PC(20) and pulmonary function values. CONCLUSIONS: Response to fluticasone and montelukast vary considerably. Children with low pulmonary function or high levels of markers associated with allergic inflammation should receive ICS therapy. Other children could receive either ICSs or LTRAs.     

Protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by montelukast in aspirin-sensitive and aspirin-tolerant patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: Montelukast, a cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor antagonist, was reported to have a protective effect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Aspirin-induced asthma (AIA) is characterized by overproduction of cysteinyl-leukotrienes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the response to exercise and the effect of montelukast on EIB in AIA as compared to aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA). METHODS: A placebo-controlled, double blind, cross-over randomized study was performed in 19 AIA and 21 ATA patients with stable asthma. A single dose of montelukast (10 mg) or placebo (PL), was given orally one hour prior to exercise challenge. FEV1 was measured before and 5, 10, 15 min after exercise and then at 15-minute intervals for 4 h. Urinary LTE4 excretion and blood eosinophil count were measured at baseline, 2 h and 4 h following exercise challenge. RESULTS: Positive bronchial response to exercise was observed in 47.5% of all patients studied. Exercise led to almost identical maximal fall in FEV1 in AIA and ATA patients (23.5% +/- 6.8% vs. 21.8% +/- 12.0%, respectively; P = 0.7). Montelukast, as compared to PL, significantly attenuated EIB in 63.2% of 19 patients with positive exercise test preceded by PL. The mean of maximum fall in FEV1 from the pre-exercise value was 10.2% +/- 13.8 after montelukast as compared to 22.5% +/- 10.2 after placebo (P < 0.001). No significant differences between protective effect of montelukast was observed in AIA as compared to ATA patients (P = 0.63, anova). Urinary LTE4 excretion showed no change following exercise, irrespective of the result of the test in all subjects. CONCLUSION: Patients with AIA and ATA react similarly to exercise challenge and obtain similar protection against EIB by montelukast.     

Protective effect of montelukast on lower and upper respiratory tract responses to short-term cat allergen exposure.

BACKGROUND: Challenge with short-term exposure to airborne cat allergen in sensitized patients produces pulmonary function changes and rhinitis symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefit of montelukast, 10 mg, for patients with concomitant asthma and allergic rhinitis as demonstrated by protection against both lower and upper airway responses to cat allergen challenge. METHODS: This randomized, crossover study treated patients with montelukast vs placebo during two 2-week, double-blind treatment periods, separated by a 1-week washout period. After each treatment period, patients underwent a 60-minute or less exposure to high levels of airborne cat allergen. Lower and upper airway responses were measured by spirometry and symptom scores. RESULTS: Of 52 patients with data from both treatment arms, 79% of patients taking montelukast and 67% taking placebo were exposed to the full 60-minute allergen challenge. Montelukast provided significant (P < or = .001) protection against allergen challenge in the lower airway coprimary end point of area under the curve during challenge (AUC0-60min) for percentage decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second: mean of 10.5% per hour and 14.7% per hour for montelukast and placebo, respectively. Although the effect on the overall nasal symptoms score (NSS) coprimary end point of AUC0-60min was not statistically significance (P = .12), nasal congestion during the challenge and NSS during recovery showed statistically significant (P = .048) protection by montelukast. Additional analyses of simultaneous lower and upper airway responses showed that more patients taking montelukast (22, 43%) vs placebo (13, 26%) were protected from both asthma and rhinitis (P = .02), with an odds ratio of 2.24 (95% CI, 1.16-4.32) in favor of montelukast. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast has a protective effect against both lower and upper airway responses during exposure to high levels of cat allergen.     

The efficacy of montelukast in the treatment of cat allergen-induced asthma in children

BACKGROUND: Montelukast is a leukotriene antagonist approved for the treatment of childhood asthma in children age 2 years and older. There are limited studies on its effects on allergic asthma in children. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate montelukast's effects on upper and lower airway responses to intense cat allergen exposure. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial 18 subjects aged 6 to 14 years with cat-induced asthma were randomly assigned to receive 1 week each of either montelukast or placebo, followed by a 1-hour cat challenge in an environmental exposure unit. Upper and lower respiratory tract symptoms were rated, and spirometry and acoustic rhinometry were performed. Challenges were stopped early if the subject became too uncomfortable or had a greater than 50% decrease in FEV1. RESULTS: Overall changes in FEV1 were significantly different with montelukast treatment and remained significant after adjusting for allergen level (P =.02; adjusted P =.01). Lower respiratory tract symptom scores were significantly reduced with montelukast versus placebo (P =.007) but lost significance after adjusting for allergen level (P =.16). Challenge length was significantly longer with montelukast versus placebo (P <.001) and remained significant after adjusting for allergen level (P =.019). Montelukast did not significantly affect upper respiratory responses, as measured by means of symptom scores (P =.43) and changes in acoustic rhinometry (P =.078). CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast was significantly more effective than placebo in attenuating lower respiratory responses and extending challenge length when cat-sensitive children with mild persistent asthma were exposed to high levels of cat allergen.     

Montelukast plus cetirizine in the prophylactic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: influence on clinical symptoms and nasal allergic inflammation

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate effects of 6-week pretreatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR) with cetirizine, and montelukast, alone and in combination. Antihistamine/antileukotriene treatment is effective in AR. Antihistamines may prevent AR symptoms while prophylactic activity of antileukotrienes remains unclear. METHODS: Sixty AR patients, aged 18-35 years, were randomized to receive placebo, montelukast only, cetirizine only, or montelukast plus cetirizine, 6 weeks prior and 6 weeks after the beginning of grass pollen season. Mean self-recorded in-season symptom scores and mean weekly all-symptom scores were analyzed. In 31 patients, nasal lavages were performed before treatment, and at the end of the study, i.e. 12 weeks after the treatment initiation. Eosinophil and basophil counts, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and mast cell tryptase (MCT) levels were evaluated in lavage samples. RESULTS: Combined montelukast/cetirizine pretreatment significantly reduced in-season symptom score for sneezing, eye itching, nasal itching, rhinorrhea, and congestion. Montelukast plus cetirizine were more effective than cetirizine alone in preventing eye itching, rhinorrhea, and nasal itching. Moreover, combined pretreatment with montelukast and cetirizine delayed appearance of AR symptoms. Eosinophil nasal lavage fluid counts were significantly increased during pollen season in placebo and montelukast-only groups. No differences were observed in basophil counts. The in-season ECP level was significantly increased in all groups except montelukast-plus-cetirizine group. In-season MCT levels were not increased. CONCLUSION: Combined antihistamine and antileukotriene treatment started 6 weeks before the pollen season is effective in preventing AR symptoms and reduces allergic inflammation in nasal mucosa during natural allergen exposure.     

Effects of a leukotriene receptor antagonist on exhaled leukotriene E4 and prostanoids in children with asthma

BACKGROUND: Leukotriene (LT) E(4) and 8-isoprostane concentrations are elevated in exhaled breath condensate in children with asthma. The effects of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) on exhaled leukotriene and prostanoids in children with asthma are unknown. OBJECTIVE: (1) To study the effect of montelukast, a LTRA, on exhaled LTE(4), 8-isoprostane, and prostaglandin E(2) in children with asthma and atopic children; (2) to measure exhaled nitric oxide. METHODS: An open-label study with oral montelukast (5 mg once daily for 4 weeks) was undertaken in 17 atopic children with asthma and 16 atopic children without asthma. RESULTS: Pretreatment exhaled LTE(4) (P < .0001) and 8-isoprostane (P < .0001) values were higher in atopic children with asthma than in atopic children without asthma. In atopic children with asthma, montelukast reduced exhaled LTE(4) by 33% (P < .001), and this reduction was correlated with pretreatment LTE(4) values (r = -0.90; P = .0001). Posttreatment exhaled LTE(4) levels in children with asthma were higher than pretreatment LTE(4) values in atopic children without asthma (P < .004). Montelukast had no effect on exhaled LTE(4) in atopic children without asthma (P = .74), or on exhaled 8-isoprostane (atopic children with asthma, P = .94; atopic children without asthma, P = .55) and PGE(2) (atopic children with asthma, P = .56; atopic children without asthma, P = .93) in both groups. In atopic children with asthma, exhaled nitric oxide concentrations were reduced by 27% (P < .05) after montelukast. CONCLUSION: Leukotriene receptor antagonists decrease exhaled LTE(4) in atopic children with asthma. This reduction is dependent on baseline exhaled LTE(4) values. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Measurement of exhaled LTE(4) might help identify children with asthma most likely to benefit from LTRAs.