Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: evidence and evolution

The introduction of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)in 1992 has dramatically changed the management of severe maleinfertility. In severe male infertility, live birth rates withICSI are superior to those with other non-donor treatments.In non-male infertility, however, pregnancy rates are not betterwith ICSI than with in vitro fertilization (IVF). With obstructiveor non-obstructive azoospermia, reasonable pregnancy rates arenow possible with ICSI after recovery of sperm from the testesfollowed by ICSI. Genetic counselling is indicated for severemale infertility, whether or not ICSI is considered. ICSI isindicated in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to avoidcontamination by extraneous DNA in the case of PCR-based testingand to increase the number of embryos available for testing.In turn, PGD may be indicated in pregnancies that are at highrisk of aneuploidy because of genetic factors associated withazoospermia. As with IVF, not all couples succeed, but 2% ofcouples with failed ICSI cycles will conceive without treatment.ICSI outcome studies indicate that there is a significant increasein prematurity, low birthweight, and perinatal mortality associatedwith single and multiple births, similar to the outcomes ofconventional IVF. However, as evidenced in long-term follow-upstudies, the higher rates of urogenital abnormalities and increaseduse of healthcare may be associated with paternal characteristics.     

Experience with assisted fertilization in severe male factor infertility and unexplained failed fertilization in vitro

We present results of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles usingassisted fertilization at our centre. Assisted fertilizationwas performed in those couples who had failed to fertilize oocyteswith conventional IVF, or where this was predicted by the presenceof severe male factor infertility. In 20 consecutive assistedfertilization cycles 223 oocyted were subjected exclusivelyto subzonal insemination (SUZI). Subsequently in 32 consecutiveassisted fertilization cycles 418 oocytes were subjected tointra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). More oocytes weredamaged by ICSI (8.9%) than by SUZI (2.3%) (p = 0.03), but normalfertilization resulted more often after ICSI (56.9%) than SUZI(35.8%) (p = 0.004). Sperm parameters, other than sufficientnumbers to perform the procedures, had no effect on fertilizationor pregnancy rates. Every cycle led to the transfer of at leastone embryo. Pregnancy resulted from eight of the SUZI cycles(40%) and nine of the ICSI cycles (28%). Implantation rateswere calculated as 25 and 12% for SUZI and ICSI respectively.The presence of living spermatozoa is the only semen parameterlimiting assisted fertilization. At present more centres areable to perform SUZI than ICSI and we feel it is premature toabandon SUZI altogether. Local conditions and success ratesshould be considered when decisions are made in assisted fertilizationcycles.     

Andrology: Preferences for intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus donor insemination in severe male factor infertility: a preliminary report

With the advent of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI),our programme noted a drop in the number of couples using donorinsemination (DI) for severe male factor infertility. Over thefirst 8 months in which our infertility programme offered bothtreatments, 27 consecutive couples scheduled for ICSI and 15consecutive couples scheduled for DI were evaluated Since allpatients in our infertility programme beginning in-vitro fertilization(TVF) with planned ICSI or starting DI undergo a semi-structuredpsychological interview, the psychologist's clinical notes aswell as the medical chart were reviewed and coded retrospectivelyto determine factors related to a couple's treatment choice.Couples who chose IVF-ICSI over DI had a higher occupationalstatus and included husbands with higher educational levels.Their most common motivation was to have the husband's biologicalchild (93% of couples in the ICSI group). The most common motivationfor choosing DI (60% of DI couples) was that IVF was not financiallyaffordable. Choice of treatment was not related to psychologicaladjustment, the husband having prior biological children, orhis risk of passing on a genetic defect to offspring. Thesepreliminary data raise the concern that, with the success ofICSI, DI may change in the USA from being an option dictatedby semen quality to a second choice treatment utilized for economicreasons.     

Easily decapitated spermatozoa defect: a possible cause of unexplained infertility.

We report the first 16 cases of a new sperm abnormality which we call 'easily decapitated spermatozoa defect'. This was discovered during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in couples with unexplained infertility. Semen analysis was normal, but minimal micromanipulation for ICSI resulted in decapitation of the spermatozoon during immobilization. For some oocytes the head and tail were injected separately, in others the intact sperm was injected after minimal immobilization. A fertilization rate of 47.5% was obtained using ICSI. Conventional in-vitro fertilization (IVF) on sibling oocytes (three cases) or in a previous cycle (three cases) resulted in total failure of fertilization. All patients reached the embryo transfer stage and three pregnancies resulted. Findings on electron microscopy in four cases included spermatozoa with degeneration or absence of the basal plate, abnormalities of the proximal centriole and degeneration of the midpiece with a large cytoplasmic droplet. We conclude that an occult sperm abnormality presenting as easily decapitated spermatozoa during ICSI could be a cause of unexplained infertility, as it resulted in total failure of fertilization in conventional IVF. Further research is necessary to investigate this sperm abnormality.     

Outcome of conventional IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes in mild male factor infertility

BACKGROUND: Decisions concerning the treatment choice for assisted reproduction (IVF or ICSI) are usually made after the evaluation of male fertility factors, or after taking into account the results of previous IVF attempts. There are no widely accepted criteria, so decisions for couples with male subfertility are often empirical and may lead to complete fertilization failure after IVF, or to the unnecessary use of ICSI. METHODS: A study was conducted in which half the oocytes from each of 58 couples with moderate oligo +/- astheno +/- teratozoospermia were inseminated (conventional IVF) and the other half microinjected (ICSI). The technique used for subsequent cycles depended on the results of the first cycle. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 58 IVF/ICSI attempts resulted in fertilization after ICSI only (32.8%) and 39 in fertilization after IVF and ICSI (67.2%). For patients with oocyte fertilization only after ICSI, 61.5% of the oocytes microinjected were fertilized. A mean of 2.2 embryos per patient were transferred, leading to eight clinical pregnancies (42.1%).The implantation rate was 21.4%. All subsequent cycles were carried out with ICSI. Couples with oocyte fertilization after both IVF and ICSI had slightly better semen characteristics than those with oocyte fertilization only after ICSI, but this difference was not significant. Overall, no statistically significant difference was observed between IVF and ICSI in sibling oocytes for any of the variables studied: fertilization rate, embryo morphology and rates of development, pregnancy and implantation. Although only small numbers of oocytes or embryos were available for each couple, six couples had lower fertilization rates after IVF and eight had lower embryo quality after IVF. Eight patients had lower sperm quality in the second cycle, and only seven couples underwent subsequent IVF cycles. CONCLUSIONS: This strategy enabled us to avoid 32.8% of complete fertilization failures after IVF, but not to decrease significantly the number of ICSI attempts in subsequent cycles. However, the uncertainties concerning the safety of ICSI suggest that ICSI should be used cautiously and judiciously.     

The sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic tool in the human fertility clinic

BACKGROUND: Sperm DNA integrity has been shown to be necessary for achieving and sustaining embryo development. The objective was to evaluate the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) as a diagnostic tool in clinical practice for intrauterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments. METHODS: A total of 385 semen samples from 234 couples were frozen for SCSA, and smears were prepared for morphology: 48 IUI, 139 IVF and 47 ICSI. The main SCSA variables were DNA fragmentation index (DFI), standard deviation of DFI (SD-DFI) and high DNA stainability (HDS), and the reproductive outcomes were biochemical pregnancy (BP), clinical pregnancy (CP) and implantation ratio (IR). RESULTS: The results showed no significant difference in the fertility variables BP, CP and IR when <27% DFI was used between the IVF and ICSI groups. A low number of patients received IUI with low success rate, and statistical analysis was therefore not performed. Ongoing pregnancy was achieved for both IVF and ICSI couples with DFI levels >27%, and six couples in ICSI treatment achieved CP full-term. DFI >27% had a high prognostic power for predicting no CP for IVF patients, with a specificity of 97%. Couples diagnosed with male infertility had a significantly higher level of DFI compared to couples with idiopathic fertility. Sperm head morphology showed low but significant correlations with the SCSA variables. CONCLUSION: SCSA is a useful tool in andrological diagnosis and contributes with a prognosis for the fertility outcome of conventional IVF. Although full-term pregnancy can be achieved with assisted reproductive techniques with a DFI >27%, the probability of a successful pregnancy may be reduced.     

Possibilities and limitations of techniques of assisted reproduction for the treatment of male infertility

Since relatively few spermatozoa are needed for oocyte fertilization during gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) or in-vitro fertilization (IVF), these methods have been applied in couples with infertility due to male causes. Forty-six couples with male factor infertility were enrolled in this study and results were compared with those attained in 48 couples treated with the same techniques for other than male causes. Overall, GIFT resulted in 26% ongoing pregnancies. GIFT seems to be particularly successful when the sperm concentration is 20 x 10(6)/ml or more, but sperm motility and/or morphology are poor. Nine pregnancies occurred out of 26 GIFT cycles in 18 cases selected on this basis. The ongoing pregnancy rate after IVF was 16% per patient. The latter treatment should be attempted in male immune infertility and in cases with a low sperm concentration, with or without abnormal sperm motility and/or morphology. In these circumstances, five pregnancies were attained out of 28 cycles in 14 cases. For similar sperm concentrations, the conception rate per cycle attained with techniques of assisted reproduction was more than twice that attained with conventional treatment of male infertility.     

Clinical adaptation of the sperm ubuquitin tag immunoassay (SUTI): relationship of sperm ubiquitylation with sperm quality in gradient-purified semen samples from 93 men from a general infertility clinic population

BACKGROUND: The proteolytic chaperone peptide ubiquitin accumulates in defective human spermatozoa. Immunodetection of ubiquitin in human sperm samples correlates with semen quality and male fertility. METHODS: Semen samples from 93 men from couples seeking infertility treatment were separated on a PureSperm density gradient and screened by immunofluorescence microscopy with anti-ubiquitin antibodies. The percentage of spermatozoa with head ubiquitylation was recorded and compared with clinical semen evaluation and embryo development data after IVF or ICSI. Subjects were divided into the following four groups based on the initial clinical diagnosis of the couples; group 1, male factor; group 2, idiopathic infertility; group 3, female infertility with neither partner having children previously; and group 4, female infertility with male partners having children from previous relationships. RESULTS: The percentage of sperm with ubiquitylated heads remaining after PureSperm separation in the respective groups was 4.0% (male factor), 2.5% (idiopathic infertility), 0.7% (female infertility and presumed fertile male) and 0.9% (female infertility with established fertile male). Negative correlations between sperm ubiquitin and several parameters reflective of embryo development after assisted fertilization were found within the male factor group. CONCLUSIONS: Use of this simplified ubiquitin-based sperm quality assay is feasible in a clinical environment. Since the gradient separation does not completely deplete the defective spermatozoa, the modified light microscopic sperm ubiquitin tag immunoassay could add a new level of stringency to the selection of human spermatozoa for ICSI.     

Sperm DNA fragmentation decreases the pregnancy rate in an assisted reproductive technique

BACKGROUND: Standard sperm characteristics are poor predictors of the outcome of IVF treatments. On the contrary, sperm genome quality has been emphasized for several years as playing a major role in early embryogenesis, thus in the success of IVF attempt. METHODS: Sperm DNA fragmentation from a selected group of 104 couples undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART) (IVF: n = 50; and ICSI: n = 54) was measured by TUNEL assay and correlated with semen and ART outcomes. RESULTS: A negative correlation was found between sperm characteristics and the proportion of sperm showing DNA fragmentation. For fragmentation >10%, a significant decrease of the fertilization rate was observed. No correlation was found between sperm DNA fragmentation and embryo quality. A high proportion of sperm with fragmented DNA was a pejorative factor to obtain pregnancies when ICSI was performed, but there was no relationship when conventional IVF was performed. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of sperm with DNA fragmentation appears to be potentially useful as a predictor of ICSI outcome, whereas embryo quality based on morphological criteria, appeared unaffected by DNA fragmentation.     

Comparison between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with high insemination concentration after total fertilization failure in a previous IVF attempt.

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether couples with total fertilization failure in a previous in-vitro fertilization (IVF) attempt should be offered an additional IVF treatment with elevated insemination concentration or should be treated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In 23 cycles 228 sibling metaphase II (MII) oocytes were randomly divided: 143 and 85 oocytes were utilized for ICSI and IVF respectively. Of the 143 injected (ICSI) oocytes, 90 (62.9%) were normally fertilized (two pronuclei), whereas 21 (14.7%) oocytes were damaged by the ICSI procedure. Of the fertilized oocytes 72 (80%) developed into transferable embryos. No fertilization at all was observed in the 85 sibling MII oocytes which were inseminated (P < 0.001). In all 23 cycles at least one embryo, obtained by ICSI, could be replaced. Eight pregnancies were achieved of which six resulted in the delivery of nine healthy children. In conclusion, for couples with no or almost no fertilization of oocytes in previous IVF attempts, ICSI appeared to be far superior to an additional IVF attempt with further elevated insemination concentrations.     

Andrology: Successful treatment of severe male factor infertility in 100 consecutive cycles using intracytoplasmic sperm injection

In this report, we present the results of our first 100 consecutivecycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Overall,fertilization occurred in 98% of cycles and embryos were transferredin 94% (2.6 embryos per cycle). About 50% of patients had embryosfrozen. The overall fertilization rate was 71%, of which 4%were abnormally fertilized (three pronuclei). A total of 30clinical pregnancies were established (32% per transfer), resultingin 18 singleton, six twin and one triplet ongoing pregnancies.The implantation rate per embryo was 15%. There were no significantdifferences in the fertilization or pregnancy rates betweenpatients Who had only occasional motile spermatozoa in the ejaculate,semen that was too poor for routine in-vitro fertilization (IVF),or who had failed routine IVF and/or subzonal sperm injection(SUZI). A group of 18 patients were treated with both ICSI androutine IVF on their first cycle because of the high likelihoodof failed fertilization due to poor sperm morphology (<20%normal). In this group, ICSI oocytes had a fertilization rateof 76% compared to only 15% for the routine IVF (control) oocytes,and six patients conceived after transfer of ICSI embryos (33%),indicating that ICSI can be used successfully on 50% of theoocytes if fertilization failure is expected. Similarly, patientswho had failed to become pregnant with SUZI achieved excellentresults after ICSI. There were no significant differences betweenICSI and routine IVF in the proportions of grade 1, 2 or 3 embryoson day 3 post-oocyte recovery. In conclusion, we have achievedresults comparable to those reported from Belgium and we havefound that ICSI is universally applicable to all forms of severemale factor infertility. ICSI produces fertilization, pregnancyand freezing rates comparable to routine IVF with normozoospermicsamples and has none of the drawbacks of other assisted fertilizationtechniques.     

The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection with electroejaculates from anejaculatory men

Electroejaculation has been successfully used for sperm procurement in anejaculatory men desiring fertility. However, electroejaculates typically have normal sperm numbers but poor motility, morphology, and functional deficiencies. Here we report the pregnancy outcome of a series of couples undergoing combined electroejaculation and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In all, 13 couples underwent a total of 18 cycles. The aetiologies of anejaculation included history of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancers, spinal cord injury and psychogenic causes. ICSI was performed on 192 oocytes, resulting in a fertilization rate of 75.5%. A total of 15 embryo transfers were performed using a total of 51 embryos. Clinical pregnancy rate, as defined by positive fetal heart rate(s) using vaginal sonography, was 55.6% per retrieval; implantation rate was 33.3% per embryo. These rates appear to be similar to those obtained in standard IVF for non-male factor infertility, or ICSI for male factor infertility. The use of ICSI for electroejaculates undoubtedly provides these couples with the highest chance of pregnancy.      

Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen.

An auto-controlled study was conducted in couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen. The fertilization rates and embryonic development in sibling oocytes treated, using the same semen sample, either by conventional in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at the same time were compared. Sibling oocyte-cumulus complexes (OCC) of 56 different couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen were randomly divided in order of retrieval into two groups inseminated either by conventional IVF or by ICSI. Of the retrieved OCC in the same cohort, 53.0 +/- 31.2 and 62.0 +/- 26.6% showed two distinct pronuclei after conventional IVF and ICSI respectively (not significant). Complete fertilization failure occurred after conventional IVF in 12.5% (7/56 couples). After ICSI, the comparable figure was 3.6% (2/56). The number of cases was too small to apply a statistical test to this difference. Total cleavage rates were quite similar: 86.7 +/- 28.0 and 90.1 +/- 21% of the zygotes developed into transferable embryos after IVF and ICSI respectively (not significant). Similarly, no difference in embryo quality was observed. Although injection and insemination of the oocytes were performed at the same time in the two groups, at 42 h post-insemination more embryos were at the four-cell stage after ICSI (P < 0.001) than after conventional IVF, where more embryos were still at the two-cell stage (P < 0.02). Embryo transfer was possible in all 56 couples, resulting in 16 positive serum human chorionic gonadotrophin tests (28.6% per embryo transfer), from which a clinical pregnancy resulted in 15 couples. The best embryos were selected for transfer independently of the insemination procedure, but preferably from the same origin. There appeared to be no difference in implantation potency of the embryos obtained with either technique after the non-randomized transfers.     

Cumulative delivery rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: 5 year follow-up of 498 patients.

The use of life-table analysis for infertility data has the advantages of clarity and ease of application. Success rates per cycle have been reported, but not cumulative delivery rates for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We selected retrospectively 498 Belgian patients <37 years old, who had their first ICSI cycle between July 1992 and December 1993. Follow-up was till the end of October 1997. Outcome measure was any delivery >25 weeks. These couples underwent 963 ICSI cycles using fresh ejaculated spermatozoa. The indications for ICSI were long-standing severe male infertility or fertilization failure after conventional in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Cumulative delivery rates were calculated by life-table analysis and compared according to age groups and sperm quality. There were 298 deliveries within a mean rate per cycle of 31%. The average number of cycles required for a delivery was 3.15 (CI 2.88; 3.43). Twenty-three (4.6%) spontaneous pregnancies occurred after the patients had finished therapy. There was no significant difference between the sperm quality groups but delivery rates decreased significantly with increasing female age. The real delivery rate after six cycles was 60%, while the expected cumulative delivery rate was 86%. This life-table analysis may provide a means by which to counsel couples on the likelihood of a delivery following ICSI.     

A comparison of ICSI outcomes with fresh and cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa from the same couples

The published experience with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) suggests that fertilization and pregnancy success rates are comparable to those achieved with freshly retrieved spermatozoa. However, no study has exactly compared clinical outcomes between the two IVF/ICSI cycles in the same couples. To formally address this issue, we assessed ICSI outcomes in couples each of whom had had two IVF/ICSI cycles: one using fresh and the second using frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa obtained from a single aspiration procedure. From a pool of 101 consecutive patients undergoing IVF/ICSI with epididymal spermatozoa, 19 couples initially used fresh epididymal spermatozoa and subsequently underwent a second IVF/ICSI procedure with frozen-thawed spermatozoa from the same aspiration. Normal (2PN) oocyte fertilization rates, embryo quality and pregnancy rates were compared between the two IVF/ICSI cycles for each couple. In the fresh epididymal sperm group, 58.4% of the injected oocytes fertilized normally compared with 62.0% of the injected oocytes in the frozen-thawed epididymal sperm group, revealing no statistically significant difference. Graded embryo quality also did not differ significantly between the paired IVF/ICSI cycles. The clinical pregnancy rates were 31.6% (6/19) and 36.8% (7/19) in the first and second cycles respectively. All but one pregnancy were singletons. In summary, this study provides strong evidence to support the notion that motile, cryopreserved and thawed epididymal spermatozoa are equal to freshly retrieved spermatozoa for ICSI in couples with obstructive azoospermia.     

The outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with retrograde ejaculation.

The objective of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the benefit of assisted fertilization in cases of anejaculatory infertility due to retrograde ejaculation. We report the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. In 16 couples in which the men suffered from retrograde ejaculation. We performed 35 cycles of ICSI with spermatozoa retrieved from post-ejaculatory urine. The patients had been instructed to alkalinize the urine by ingesting sodium bicarbonate before the procedure. The fertilization rate averaged 51.2%. Seven clinical pregnancies were achieved. Three spontaneous first trimester abortions occurred, but three live offspring were delivered and one pregnancy is ongoing. In conclusion, the use of ICSI may be feasible for patients with retrograde ejaculation who are resistant to medical treatment and whose sperm quality is so low or unpredictable that intrauterine insemination or conventional methods of in-vitro fertilization are not possible.     

Perinatal complications of assisted reproduction

The main perinatal complications of assisted reproduction include congenital malformation, chromosomal aberrations, multiple pregnancy, and prematurity. Earlier studies and in vitro fertilization (IVF) registries showed that there was no increased incidence of congenital malformations in children conceived by IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, a large Australian study has found that by one year of age, the incidence of congenital malformations in IVF/ICSI children is increased in comparison with those naturally conceived. Several investigators found a slight but increased risk of chromosomal aberrations in ICSI children. Multiple pregnancy is a major cause of increased perinatal mortality due to increased incidence of both prematurity and congenital malformations. Even in singleton pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies, the risk of prematurity and newborns small for gestational age is increased. In this article, recently published work on perinatal complications associated with assisted reproductive technologies is reviewed.     

Subzonal insemination, partial zona dissection or intracytoplasmic sperm injection? An easy decision?

This review aims to analyse and compare the results to dateof subzonal insemination (SUZI), partial zona dissection (PZD)and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to evaluate criticallywhether it is now possible to replace SUZI and PZD by ICSI.It appears that ICSI is a much more efficient assisted reproductiontechnique than SUZI and PZD for resolving cases of severe maleinfertility and/or repeated failure of conventional in-vitrofertilization (IVF). For ICSI compared with SUZI and PZD, fertilization(49.4, 17.7 and 16.8% respectively), percentage of patientsreaching embryo transfer (91.0, 55.1 and 23.3% respectively),percentage of transfers performed with two or three embryos(83.3% ICSI and 39.3% SUZI), pregnancy rate per embryo replacement(28.2, 18.7 and 16.5% respectively) and pregnancy rate per oocyteretrieval (24.8, 10.3 and 3.8% respectively) are all improved.In addition, cases of severely impaired semen characteristics,which were condemned to infertility for life with conventionalIVF, SUZI or PZD, can now be treated and resolved efficientlywith ICSI.     

In-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of infertility after testicular cancer

Treatment of testicular cancer (TC) may cause infertility due to reduced sperm quality with or without an ejaculation problem. In cases of anejaculation or retrograde ejaculation, spermatozoa can be obtained by transrectal electroejaculation (TE) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and used for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In this study, 15 out of 17 couples evaluated for infertility after TC, underwent a total of 21 treatment cycles, resulting in 18 embryo transfers. Spermatozoa were obtained by TE in 16 cycles, by masturbation in three cycles and by TESE in one. In one cycle no spermatozoa were found using TESE. Fertilization and cleavage was achieved by IVF in seven cycles and ICSI in 11 cycles; average fertilization rates of 57 and 55% respectively were observed. Twelve clinical pregnancies occurred, of which 11 have been delivered or are ongoing. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 57% per cycle. These results show that infertility after testicular cancer can be treated effectively with IVF and that ICSI even permits treatment of patients who have severe oligozoospermia.