Use of hepatitis B core antibody-positive liver allograft in hepatitis C virus-positive and -negative recipients with use of short course of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and Lamivudine

INTRODUCTION: With the shortage of donor organs, increasing number of hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive [HBcAb(+)] liver allografts are being used for liver transplantation (LTx) in patients who are HBcab-negative [HBsAb(-)]. This study was aimed at assessing outcomes for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive [HCV(+)] and HCV-negative [HCV(-)] patients who received HBcAb(+) liver grafts from deceased donors and also received a short course of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) with long-term lamivudine therapy after LTx. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 1995 through February 2003, 28 patients (mean age 53.8 +/- 10.2 years, 19 men and nine women, 16 HCV[-]; 12 HCV[+]) received HbcAb(+) liver allografts. All recipients received a short course of HBIg prophylaxis (10,000 units/day for 4 days) and long-term lamivudine 100 mg/d after LTx in addition to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. RESULTS: Seven (25%) of the 28 recipients died during follow-up and three recipients required retransplantation. Three recipients (10.7%) developed HBV infection during follow-up, one of whom died 36 months after LTx and the other two had YMDD mutant HBV. The overall 6-year actuarial patient survival after transplantation was 74.4% and those for HCV(-) and HCV(+) recipients were 81.3% and 66.6%, respectively (P = .46). The overall 6-year actuarial graft survival was 63.9% and those for HCV(+) and HCV(-) recipients were 68.8% and 57.1%, respectively (P = .6). CONCLUSION: We conclude that HBcAb(+) liver grafts can be used for both HCV(+) patients and HCV(-) patients who are critically ill, have early hepatocellular carcinoma, or have been exposed to HBV in the past. A short course of HBIg-lamivudine combination therapy provides effective prophylaxis against HBV infection in 89% of recipients of HBcAb(+) grafts.     

Use of hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors in orthotopic liver transplantation

HYPOTHESIS: Hepatic allografts from donors positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) frequently transmit hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection to recipients. Therefore, most transplantation centers will not use these organs for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although it is expensive and not always efficacious, hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) has been used routinely for indefinite periods to prevent HBV infection in liver allograft recipients. We assessed the effectiveness of long-term use of a nucleoside analog, lamivudine, in preventing HBV transmission by anti-HBc-positive allografts. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Twelve patients received hepatic allografts from anti-HBc-positive donors at Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, between February 23, 1998, and March 13, 2001. INTERVENTION: All patients received 10 000 U/d of intravenous HBIG for 7 days. In addition, they received 300 mg/d of lamivudine in divided doses. Their liver biopsy specimens were tested for HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb). Serum samples from the donor and recipient were tested for HBcAb, HBV DNA, and hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The incidence of HBV infection in recipients who received HBcAb-positive donor livers and lamivudine prophylaxis. RESULTS: All recipients were anti-HBc negative before OLT. Five of the recipients had HBsAb titers greater than 150 U at the time of OLT. Three of the donor livers were HBV DNA positive and 2 were hepatitis B core antigen positive at the time of OLT. Donor serum was HBcAb positive in all 12 donors. None of the recipients have become infected with HBV with a follow-up of 2 to 38 months. CONCLUSION: Perioperative use of HBIG combined with long-term use of lamivudine can prevent HBV infection in recipients who receive hepatic allografts from HBcAb-positive donors.     

Long-term lamivudine monotherapy prevents development of hepatitis B virus infection in hepatitis B surface-antigen negative liver transplant recipients from hepatitis B core-antibody-positive donors

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation from hepatitis B core-antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors to hepatitis B surface-antigen (HBsAg)-negative recipients has been associated with a risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the absence of antiviral prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of long-term lamivudine monotherapy to prevent development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients of liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors. METHODS: From 315 cadaveric adult liver transplantations performed at our unit between July 1999 and March 2005, 18 recipients (5.7%) received liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors, 13 of whom were HBsAg-negative pre-transplantation. The recipients consisted of four females and 14 males, age range 28-65 yr (median 49.5 yr). Post-transplantation, HBsAg-negative recipients were administered lamivudine 100 mg daily long term. HBsAg-positive recipients were administered low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and lamivudine according to our usual protocol. Standard post-transplantation immunosuppression was given. Recipients were followed up regularly (range 2-69 months, median 21 months) for development of de novo HBV infection. RESULTS: Ten HBsAg-negative recipients received long-term lamivudine. One patient (HBcAb and HBsAb positive pre-transplant) did not receive lamivudine and, in two patients, lamivudine was discontinued following urgent re-transplantation for primary graft non-function. All 13 of the HBsAg-negative recipients were still alive, with no evidence of HBV infection at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Long-term lamivudine monotherapy was effective in preventing development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative liver transplant recipients from HBcAb-positive donors.     

Successful Active Immunization Using a Hepatitis B Virus Vaccination Protocol for a Recipient With Hepatitis B Core Antibody–Positive Liver Graft

Introduction

Donor shortages occasionally necessitate the use of hepatic allografts from hepatitis B core antibody–positive (HBcAb+) donors, with an attendant risk of post-transplantation hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate a protocol of active immunization for prevention of post-transplantation de novo HBV infection in patients receiving liver grafts from HBcAb+ donors.

Patients and Methods

Ten patients who had received HBcAb+ liver grafts at Shinshu University Hospital between October 1996 and December 2012 were enrolled. All the recipients were negative for HBV serological tests, and HBV-DNA. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) was given routinely in the peritransplantation and post-transplantation periods, without antiviral drugs. Subcutaneous vaccination with recombinant HBV was given at a dosage of 20 μg in adults and 5 μg in children concomitant with HBIG until acquisition of active immunization. The timing to start HBV vaccination was dependent on the condition of the patient.

Results

The median follow-up period after liver transplantation was 140 months, and the median period after transplantation until the start of vaccination was 7.0 months. Nine patients (90%) acquired active immunity after a median number of 4 (range, 2–13) vaccinations (hepatitis B surface antibody >300 mIU/mL for 1 year, or >100 mIU/mL thereafter), and did not require HBIG administration thereafter. None had any side effects of HBV vaccination or developed hepatitis B infection during the study period. Four fast responders who achieved antibody high titers by active immunization within 9 months received pretransplantation vaccinations, whereas 5 slow responders did not.

Conclusions

Our vaccination protocol provides a new effective strategy for prevention of de novo hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation in recipients with HBcAb+ liver grafts. Pretransplantation HBV vaccination was helpful for the post-transplantation vaccine response.     

乙型肝炎病毒和丙型肝炎病毒感染对肾移植受者存活的影响

目的探讨乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和(或)丙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis C virus,HCV)感染对肾移植受者长期存活的影响及预防措施。方法 HBV和(或)HCV感染肾移植受者110例(感染组),其中HBV感染受者56例、HCV感染受者52例,HBV与HCV合并感染2例。非HBV与非HCV感染受者694例(非感染组)。感染组受者术前有病毒复制者予积极治疗,研究早期肝功能正常者可接受肾移植,后期均用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,要求连续3～6个月HBV脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)0copy/ml,HCV核糖核酸(RNA)0copy/ml方可接受肾移植。术后定期检测HBV与HCV,定期检测感染组受者HBVDNA滴度、HCVRNA滴度。发现HBV复制,选用拉米夫定、阿德福韦酯治疗,酌情减少免疫抑制剂用量。分别比较两组术后1、3、5年人、肾存活率,比较两组的肝功能衰竭病死率。结果非感染组人、肾存活率分别为:1年94.2%、91.4%,3年为86.4%、85.2%,5年为82.7%、78.9%;感染组人、肾存活率分别为:1年90.2%、88.1%,3年为88.9%、86.2%,5年为81.5%、76.3%;两组数据比较差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。感染组中14例(12.7%)死于肝功能衰竭,其中10例为HBV感染者,非感染组受者无1例死于肝衰竭。感染组术后肝衰竭病死率明显高于非感染组(12.7%、0,P<0.05)。结论受者术前HBV和(或)HCV感染会明显增加肾移植术后肝衰竭死亡危险。患者术前处于病毒复制期应予积极治疗,在肝炎病毒停止复制6个月后再考虑肾移植。长期随访中应定期复查HBV与HCV感染指标,早确诊、早治疗,并及时调整免疫抑制剂剂量。     

Shorter waiting times for hepatitis C virus seropositive recipients of cadaveric renal allografts from hepatitis C virus seropositive donors

Introduction. The purposes of this study were: 1) to analyze the early results of cadaveric renal transplantation from either hepatitis C virus seropositive (HCV+) or hepatitis C virus seronegative (HCV−) donors into HCV+ recipients; and 2) to determine whether HCV+ patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) might benefit from receiving renal allografts from HCV+ donors.
Methods. From January 1997 to June 1999, 28 patients with ESRD and HCV infection underwent 29 cadaveric renal transplants. The data were reviewed retrospectively. Nineteen of the renal transplants were performed with allografts obtained from 15 HCV+ donors and 10 with allografts obtained from 10 HCV− donors. The median follow-up was 16.2 months, with an average of 15.4±2 months.
Results. Recipients of HCV+ renal allografts had shorter waiting times for transplantation. On average, patients who received a kidney from HCV+ donors were transplanted 9±3 months after being placed on the transplant list, compared to 29±3 months for patients who received a kidney from a HCV− donor. Shorter waiting times were noted in every blood type group. There were no significant differences in rejection episodes, infectious complications, renal function, liver function, graft survival, or patient survival.
Conclusions. The use of renal allografts from HCV+ donors for HCV+ recipients shortens the waiting time for these patients, with no short-term differences in renal and liver function, graft loss, or patient survival.     

Transplantation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positive,nucleic acid test negative donor kidneys to HCV negative patients frequently results in seroconversion but not HCV viremia

Anecdotal reports have suggested that transplantation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positive (Ab+)/nucleic acid test negative (NAT?) donor kidneys into HCV negative recipients is not associated with HCV transmission. We reviewed our center's outcomes of 32 HCV negative patients who received kidney allografts from 25 donors who were HCV Ab+/NAT?. The mean recipient age was 56.9 ± 12.1 years and the mean donor age was 41.5 ± 14 years, with a median Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 68%. Twelve donors (48%) met Public Health Service (PHS) increased risk status. All patients received antithymocyte globulin induction followed by tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid maintenance immunosuppression. With a mean follow‐up posttransplant of 10 ± 2.7 months, 1‐ and 3‐ month serum creatinine levels were 1.7 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 0.4, respectively, and patient and graft survival rates were 100% and 97%, respectively. Fourteen patients (44%) seroconverted and became HCV Ab+ posttransplant. However, all 32 patients were HCV RNA negative at 1‐ and 3‐ months posttransplant, and 27 and 8 patients tested at 6‐ and 12‐months posttransplant, respectively, remain HCV RNA negative. In conclusion, transplantation of HCV Ab+/NAT? kidneys to HCV negative recipients frequently causes HCV Ab seroconversion but not HCV viremia.     

Elderly recipients of hepatitis C positive renal allografts can quickly develop liver disease

Our institution explored using allografts from donors with Hepatitis C virus (HCV) for elderly renal transplantation (RT). Thirteen HCV- elderly recipients were transplanted with HCV+ allografts (eD+/R-) between January 2003 and April 2009. Ninety HCV- elderly recipients of HCV- allografts (eD-/R-), eight HCV+ recipients of HCV+ allografts (D+/R+) and thirteen HCV+ recipients of HCV- allografts (D-/R+) were also transplanted. Median follow-up was 1.5 (range 0.8-5) years. Seven eD+/R- developed a positive HCV viral load and six had elevated liver transaminases with evidence of hepatitis on biopsy. Overall, eD+/R- survival was 46% while the eD-/R- survival was 85% (P = 0.003). Seven eD+/R- died during follow-up. Causes included multi-organ failure and sepsis (n = 4), cancer (n = 1), failure-to-thrive (n = 1) and surgical complications (n = 1). One eD+/R- died from causes directly related to HCV infection. In conclusion, multiple eD+/R- quickly developed HCV-related liver disease and infections were a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality.     

Use of hepatitis B core antibody-positive donor kidneys in hepatitis B surface antibody-positive and -negative recipients

INTRODUCTION: The rate of hepatitis B virus transmission via organs from with isolated hepatitis B virus core antibody-positive (HBcAb+) donors in kidney transplant recipients seems very low. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over 4 years, we performed 36 transplants from Ig HBcAb+, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative donors into recipients with a history of prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or reported vaccination (28 patients) and in recipients who were not immunized and received a pretransplant prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulins. We examined the HBV-related outcomes in these 36 patients in comparison with 40 recipients of allografts from HBcAb- donors. RESULTS: No patient receiving an allograft from an HBcAb+ donor developed clinical HBV infection or HBSAg positivity. The rate of seroconversion was 14.2% in immunized patients, 12.5% in nonimmunized patients, and 0% in the control group. The 17.8% of immunized patients developed elevated transaminases after transplant, in comparison with 25% and 10% in the nonimmunized patients and the control group, respectively. Graft and patient survival was 93% and 93% for immunized patients, 100% and 100% for nonimmunized patients, and 98% and 95% for the control group, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of anti-HBc antibody-positive kidneys was associated with no risk of transmission of HBV infection, without affecting graft and patient survival, and could be considered a safe way to expand the donor pool. Our preliminary results suggest that such kidneys could be safely transplanted even in not immunized patients who underwent a prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulins.     

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation

Abstract The hepatitis C virus is a common cause of chronic hepatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We evaluated 95 consecutive patients who underwent OLT at our institute between March 1988 and November 1992 and who had a follow-up period longer than 3 months. All patients had a second-generation test (ELISA + RIBA) for HCV antibodies (HCV Ab) before and monthly after OLT; all had a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of viral RNA after the operation. Whenever biochemical abnormalities (hyper-transaminasemia 2 times the normal range) were seen, a percutaneous liver biopsy was performed. Forty-two HCV Ab + patients before OLT remained positive after OLT. In this group the PCR test was positive in 32 cases (78.5%). In 13/42 (30.9%) cases (all PCR +) with hypertransaminasemia histological examination showed signs of viral C hepatitis (score of Knodell minimum 3, maximum 12, median 5.5). Of 53 HCV Ab patients before OLT, only 1 became HCV Ab+ and PCR+ 15 months after OLT. In the remaining 52 patients 15 were PCR+. Twenty of 53 patients (37.7%) had a liver biopsy because of hypertransaminasemia: in no case did histology show any signs of hepatitis C. In conclusion, viral C recurs often after OLT for post-hepatitic C cirrhosis. The histological graft lesions are in most cases moderate. We did not observe any deaths related to viral C infection in grafted patients. According to our results post-hepatic C cirrhosis remains a good indication for OLT.     

HBV and HCV infections in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant (HTx) recipients risk acquiring hepatotropic viral infections such as hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), and the impact of these infections on post-HTx survival remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to define the prevalence, clinical features, and natural history of HBV and HCV infections in a cohort of HTx recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 360 consecutive patients who had undergone HTx. Clinical picture, hepatic injury indexes, and HBV/HCV viral serology were followed post-transplant. RESULTS: During follow-up (average, 8 +/- 3.1 years), 49 (16.5%) of the HTx recipients tested positive for at least 1 of the 2 viruses (3.1% HBV, 12% HCV, 0.5% concomitant infection). The prevalence of HCV infection in heart transplant recipients transplanted before and after 1990 was 28% and 4.2%, respectively, the latter being markedly lower (p < 0.001) than in earlier series of HTx recipients and much lower than expected in the age- and sex-matched general population. All HBV-positive and 58% of HCV-positive recipients developed chronic liver disease. Sixteen percent of patients developed cirrhosis during follow-up, and 8% died of end-stage liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HBV and HCV in a large population of HTx recipients is not very different from that reported in the general population. Active viral replication of HBV and an aggressive natural history of both infections are seen in HTx recipients, however. The low prevalence of HBV- and HCV-related infection in recent series probably reflects current viral screening and vaccination policies.     

Expanding access to transplantation with hepatitis C‐positive donors: A new perspective on an old issue

With the need for organs far exceeding supply, donors previously exposed to hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) viral infections should be considered for transplantation. Although many centers have protocols for transplanting organs from HBV core antibody‐positive (HBcAb+) donors into select recipients, in the era of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs), a new focus should be placed on HCV‐positive donors. The transmission rate from HCV antibody‐positive (HCVAb+) nucleic acid testing negative (HCV NAT‐) donors is expected to be very low, and we encourage use of such organs in HCV recipients provided a normal biopsy, appropriate counseling, and careful post‐transplant monitoring. While transmission of HCV from HCV NAT+ donors is universal, the success of DAA in obtaining a sustained viral response in post‐transplant recipients should make the use of these organs more appealing. We herein provide information to help guide the use of organs from HCV donors.     

Outcomes of liver transplantation in simultaneously hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus RNA positive recipients: the deleterious effect of donor hepatitis B core antibody positivity

Background

Recent data from Italian studies have shown excellent results of liver transplantation (LT) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients with grafts from hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)—positive donors, whereas such grafts in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients have displayed poorer outcomes. We investigated the results of LT with HBcAb-positive grafts in patients with ongoing HBV and HCV coinfections.

Methods

From August 1999 to December 2009, we performed 27 adult primary LTs from deceased heart-beating donors into recipients showing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)- and HCV-RNA-positivity simultaneously: 12 patients received a graft from an HBsAg-negative HBcAb-positive donor (core+D group) and 15 from an HBcAb-negative donor (core−D group). Immunosuppression included a calcineurin inhibitor, antimetabolite and steroids which were suspended at 6 months. Anti-HBV prophylaxis was always perfomed with anti-HBs immunoglobulins and nucleos(t)idic analogues.

Results

The groups were similar regarding variables of donor, recipient, donor-recipient match, LT procedure, and acute rejection treatment. Median follow-up for surviving grafts was 67 months (range, 16-141). Among all patients, HCV-RNA remained positive after LT. The prevalence of histologically proven recurrent HCV hepatitis was similar in the 2 groups: 83% core+D vs 73% core−D. No recurrent HBV hepatitis occurred during the follow-up. Graft survival at 5 years was significantly lower in the core+D group (core+D 48% vs core−D 87%; P = .018), in which a significantly higher prevalence of graft loss was caused by HCV recurrence (core+D 5/12, 42% vs core−D 1/15, 7%; P = .03). All of the 5 core+D patients who lost their grafts due to HCV recurrence did not receive anti-HCV therapy (4 owing to an aggressive disease and 1 because of patient refusal).

Conclusions

Outcomes of LT in patients with ongoing HBV and HCV coinfection are adversely affected by donor HBcAb positivity, an effect that is mainly mediated by the dismal course of HCV recurrence after LT.     

Safe use of livers from donors with positive hepatitis B core antibody

Thirty-five patients received liver transplants using liver donors who had positive test results for the hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb). In the same time frame, 195 patients received HBcAb-negative liver donors. Mean follow up for patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors was 25 months. All patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors were monitored for recurrence of hepatitis B (HBV) with HBV DNA assays. There was no de novo HBV in recipients of HBcAb-negative grafts. In the group of patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors, 4 of 35 patients died within 3 months after transplant with no evidence of HBV recurrence at time of death. Four patients were transplanted for HBV-related disease and were postoperatively placed on lamivudine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). HBV recurrence was seen in one of these patients. Of the remaining 27 patients, three of three mismatched patients (HBcAb-positive donor to HBcAb-negative recipient) developed de novo HBV (100%). Of 24 matched patients (HBcAb-positive donor to HBcAb-positive recipient), only two (7%) developed recurrent HBV allograft reinfection. All de novo and recurrent HBV infections were successfully managed with HBIG and lamivudine therapy. Survival for this subgroup of patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors for non-HBV–related liver disease was 100%. We conclude that the judicious use of HBcAb-positive donors is reasonably safe and associated with low morbidity and mortality, with the appropriate follow-up protocols. Additionally, lamivudine use can be reserved for those cases with de novo or recurrent HBV in the liver allograft, or, selectively, as prophylaxis in those recipients patients who are naı&#x0308;ve to HBV and receive an HBcAb-positive donor. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:556-561.)     

Early experience with the use of hepatitis C antibody‐positive,nucleic acid testing‐negative donors in lung transplantation

Historically, potential lung donors who have detectable antibodies to hepatitis C virus have been declined by most centers due to concern for possible disease transmission. We sought to evaluate hepatitis C viral transmission rates from donors who were known to be HCV Ab positive but HCV NAT negative. We performed a single‐center retrospective review of a prospectively collected database for lung transplant recipients at our center including HCV Ab+NAT‐ donors (approved January 2017). Donor and recipient demographic data were compiled, and records were queried to ascertain rate of seroconversion. During the study period (1/1/17 to 8/9/17), a total of 64 recipients underwent lung transplantation. Thirteen (20%) donors were HCV Ab+NAT‐. All recipients of HCV Ab+NAT‐ grafts were HCV Ab‐ at the time of transplant. Recipients of grafts from HCV Ab+NAT‐ donors underwent protocol NAT at 2 and 12 months and all are NAT‐ to date. One recipient developed reactive HCV Ab at 6 months post‐transplant. Follow‐up NAT showed HCV RNA to be undetectable. To date, use of HCV Ab+NAT‐ donors in lung transplantation has yielded favorable outcomes, with evidence of one transient seroconversion suggesting this practice may increase access to life‐saving transplantation to those in need.     

Long-term results of treatment of chronic hepatitis B, C and D with interferon-α in renal allograft recipients

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interferon-a (IFN-α) therapy of chronic hepatitis B, C and D (HBV, HCV and HDV, respectively) in renal transplant recipients. A group of 42 patients (30 males, 12 females, mean age 38 years) with documented viraemia and chronic active hepatitis (CAH) were studied, of whom 1 had HBV infection alone, 11 had HCV infection alone, 3 had HBV and HDV infection concomitantly, 12 had HBV and HCV infection concomitantly, and 2 had HBV, HCV and HDV infection concomitantly. Patients received 3 MU IFN-α three times weekly for 6 months. After IFN-α therapy, 18 patients (43 %) achieved normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity and a partial response was observed in 12 (29%) patients. Two patients relapsed (one with HCV and one with HBV + HCV infection) immediately after the cessation of IFN-α therapy. Repeated liver biopsy was performed in 16 patients after 6–24 months of therapy and revealed progression to cirrhosis in five patients, remission in two and stable disease in nine. None of the patients cleared HCV RNA, four patients cleared HBeAg (two also HDV), and one both HBV and HCV. Five patients died during IFN-α therapy (one as a consequence of liver failure), and four died during the 6 months after therapy (two as a consequence of liver failure). During IFN-α therapy renal allograft function remained stable in 31 patients and acute rejection episodes occurred in 7, of whom 5 lost their graft and all had experienced rejection episodes before. In 16 patients normalization of ALT continued during long-term follow-up (median 22 months, range 0–84 months). IFN-α seemed to be moderately effective in the treatment of chronic HBV or HCV infections, but cannot be recommended for recipients infected with both HBV and HCV.     

Kidney transplantation for end-stage renal failure in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C viral infection

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal failure after successful liver transplantation (LTx) has been described in up to 5% of patients. Kidney transplantation (KTx) has been the treatment of choice in these cases. However, in recipients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), the augmentation of immunosuppression after KTx may result in an increased viral load. This, in turn, may adversely affect the liver allograft. METHOD: The present study retrospectively examined the outcome in 17 patients (3 females and 14 males, mean age 51.1+/-11.3 years) who received KTx after LTx. The mean interval from LTx to KTx was 57.6+/-32.1 months. The mean follow-up was 41.7+/-20.5 months after KTx, and 99.6+/-37.7 months after LTx. Sixteen of the 17 patients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression at the time of KTx. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, one patient underwent combined liver and kidney retransplantation 3.7 years after KTx and 12.7 years after LTx. She subsequently died secondary to primary nonfunction. Four other patients died, two of lung cancer, one of pancreatitis/sepsis, and one of severe depression leading to noncompliance. A total of 29 episodes of biopsy-proven acute renal allograft rejection (1.7 episodes/ patient) were encountered and treated with steroids. Seven patients experienced a rise in liver function tests during the period of increased steroid dosage. Four patients received no treatment, and their liver function returned to baseline. The remaining three were treated with interferon. Overall 1- and 3-year actuarial patient and liver allograft survival was 88% and 71% (after renal transplantation); corresponding 1- and 3-year actuarial graft survival was 88% and 61%. Twelve patients are alive with normal liver function. One patient is on dialysis, because of renal allograft loss to noncompliance. CONCLUSION: In this series, LTx recipients with HCV infection were able to undergo KTx with a reasonable degree of success. KTx should be offered for end-stage renal failure after LTx, even in the presence of HCV infection, to individuals with stable liver function and no signs of liver failure.     

Clinical and Virologic Outcomes of Hepatitis B and C Viral Coinfection After Liver Transplantation: Effect of Viral Hepatitis D

Hepatitis B (HBV) and C viral (HCV) dual-infection-associated liver disease is an uncommon indication for liver transplantation. The clinical and virologic outcomes in such patients have not been well studied. We retrospectively studied 13 patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HCV positivity who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and survived at least 30 days post-OLT Antibody to hepatitis delta virus (HDV) was negative in 8 patients (group I) and positive in 5 patients (group 11). Eleven of the 13 patients received standard hepatitis B immune prophylaxis, and they all remained HBsAg negative. All group I patients were HCV RNA positive after transplantation; in contrast, all group II patients were HCV RNA negative. Serum alanine aminotransferase levels were elevated in 88% (7 of 8) of the patients in group I compared with 20% (1 of 5 patients) in group II. None of the patients had graft loss from chronic rejection or recurrent hepatitis. Three patients had unsuspected hepatocellular carcinoma in the explant. We conclude that among liver transplant recipients with HBV and HCV coinfection, HDV infection is associated with the suppression of HCV replication and mild inflammatory activity after OLT     

Prevention of de novo hepatitis B infection in recipients of hepatic allografts from anti-HBc positive donors.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of donor organs occasionally mandates the use of hepatic allografts from anti-HBc+ donors in recipients who are susceptible to de novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The efficacy of hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine to prevent de novo HBV infection in anti-HBs negative recipients of allografts from anti-HBc+ donors has not been investigated. METHODS: After liver transplantation with an allograft from a donor positive for anti-HBc, recipients who were anti-HBs-, HbsAg- received hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) 10,000 IU i.v. daily for 7 days and monthly for 6 months. After 6 months, 1000 IU of HBIG was given IM. every 2 weeks for 18 months. Patients transplanted after 4/1/97 were given lamivudine 150 mg daily starting postoperative day 1. RESULTS: Between 8/14/96 and 6/10/98, 264 orthotopic liver transplants were performed and 16 anti-HBs-, HbsAg- patients received an hepatic allograft from a donor positive for anti-HBc. HBIG mono-therapy was administered to one patient. HBIG and lamivudine combination therapy was administered to 15 patients. Of the 16 patients, 8 were positive only for anti-HBc before transplant, and 8 were naive (anti-HBs-, anti-HBc-). The single patient who received HBIG monotherapy became HbsAg+ at 6 months. All patients receiving combination therapy with HBIG and lamivudine have remained HbsAg-. The average follow-up is 459 days (range 170-754). Two patients died from unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with HBIG and lamivudine may prevent de novo HBV infection in anti-HBs-, HbsAg- recipients of hepatic allografts from anti-HBc+ donors.     

Low prevalence of HBV DNA in the liver allograft from anti‐HBc‐positive donors: a single‐center experience

Pan J‐J, Oh S‐H, Soldevila‐Pico C, Nelson DR, Liu C. Low prevalence of HBV DNA in the liver allograft from anti‐HBc‐positive donors: a single‐center experience.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 164–170. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Allografts from donors positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc⁺) can transmit hepatitis B virus (HBV) to the recipients. We aimed to study the prevalence of HBV DNA in liver allografts from anti‐HBc⁺ donors. Between January 2003 and December 2008, this retrospective study identified 18 patients who received a liver from an anti‐HBc⁺ donor. Pre‐ and post‐transplantation HBV serology and serum HBV DNA level of the study subjects were reviewed. DNA extracted from liver biopsy tissue was used for PCR assay. Immunohistochemistry was also performed to determine viral protein expression. We observed a low prevalence of HBV DNA in allografts from anti‐HBc⁺ donors even among patients who did not receive prophylaxis. Only one of 18 patients had detectable HBV DNA in the liver allograft. This recipient was seronegative for HBV before transplantation and did not receive prophylaxis after transplantation, and developed de novo hepatitis B. Of the five patients who were positive for both antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen and anti‐HBc before transplantation and did not receive prophylaxis after transplantation, none developed HBV infection. Prophylaxis for HBV is important for seronegative recipients receiving a liver from an anti‐HBc⁺ donor. Such prophylaxis may not be necessary for recipients who do not have detectable HBV DNA in the liver allograft.