Cryoanalgesia enhances recovery from minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum resulting in reduced length of stay: A case-matched analysis of NSQIP-Pediatric patients

PurposePain control is challenging after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). Cryoanalgesia, which temporarily ablates peripheral nerves, improves pain control and may accelerate post-operative recovery. We hypothesized that cryoanalgesia would be associated with shorter length of stay (LOS) in children undergoing MIRPE.MethodsA matched cohort study was conducted of children (<18 years) who underwent MIRPE 2016–2018, using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Each patient who received cryoanalgesia during MIRPE was matched to four controls (no cryoanalgesia). Univariate and multilevel regression analyses were performed.ResultsThirty-five patients who received cryoanalgesia during MIRPE were matched to 140 controls. Patients who received cryoanalgesia had a LOS reduction with similar secondary outcomes (operative time, rates of complication, reoperation, and readmission). On multilevel regression adjusted for matched groups, cryoanalgesia was associated with a 1.3-day reduction in LOS (95% CI ?1.8 to ?0.8, p < 0.001). On sensitivity analysis excluding patients with complications, cryoanalgesia remained associated with a LOS reduction.ConclusionsCryoanalgesia is a promising adjunct in the care of pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE. Utilization is associated with a shorter LOS without an increase in operative time or complications. Cryoanalgesia should be considered for inclusion in enhanced recovery strategies for patients undergoing MIRPE.     

Initial Outcomes Using Cryoablation in Surgical Management of Slipping Rib Syndrome

IntroductionMinimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) and cartilaginous rib excision (CRE) for slipping rib syndrome (SRS) are painful procedures. Intercostal nerve cryoablation (Cryo) controls pain and decreases opioid use in MIRPE. Herein, we describe our experience with cryoablation in CRE.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed of all patients undergoing CRE between 2018 and 2022. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, operative details, and hospital course were collected.ResultsA total of 98 patients underwent CRE: 68 CRE without cryo, 22 CRE + Cryo, and 8 combined MIRPE + CRE + Cryo. Ninety percent of patients underwent bioabsorbable rib plating. Patients were predominantly female (79%, 73%, 50% respectively) with median ages 17.6, 16.9, and 14.2 years respectively. CRE + Cryo patients used significantly less opioids in hospital (0.6 OME/kg [0.1,1.2]) compared to CRE without cryo (1.0 OME/kg [0.6,2.1]), p < 0.05. The median length of stay (LOS) in CRE + Cryo was 1 day [1,2] compared to 2 days in CRE without cryo [1,2], p = 0.09. MIRPE + CRE + Cryo patients used 0.6 OME/kg [0.2,8.0] with a 2 day [1,5.5] LOS. Ninety-one percent of Cryo patients had cryoablation of T9 and/or T10 intercostal nerves, with no documented abdominal wall laxity at median follow-up of 16 days. Cryo was applied extra-thoracically in CRE + cryo without thoracoscopy or lung isolation, while MIRPE + CRE + Cryo used a combination extra-/intra-thoracic cryoablation in with thoracoscopy.ConclusionIntercostal nerve cryoablation reduces opioid use and LOS in patients undergoing cartilaginous rib excision for slipping rib syndrome. Cryotherapy to as low as T10 did not result in abdominal wall laxity and can be applied extra-thoracically without the need for thoracoscopy. Ongoing prospective studies are required to assess the long-term outcomes.Level of evidenceIII.     

Routine Biomarkers for the Severity of COVID-19 Pneumonia May Present Differently in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BackgroundThe treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is based on the patient's clinical status and levels of inflammatory biomarkers. The comparative activity of these biomarkers in kidney transplant (KT) patients with COVID-19 pneumonia from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and non–SARS-CoV-2 etiologies is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical presentation and inflammatory parameters at admission of KT patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with non–COVID-19 pneumonia over the same period.MethodsBiomarkers were measured and compared between KT patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 57) and non-COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 20) from March 2020 to March 2021.ResultsBoth groups showed comparable demographics. The KT patients with COVID-19 had fewer neutrophils (6824 ± 5000 vs 8969 ± 4206; P = .09) than the non-COVID group, although there was no significant difference in the lymphocyte count. Non–COVID-19 pneumonia was associated with higher d-dimer (median, 921 [interquartile range (IQR), 495-1680] vs median, 2215 [IQR, 879-3934]; P = 0.09) and interleukin-6 (median, 35 [IQR, 20-128] vs median, 222 [IQR, 38-500]; P = 0.006) levels. The ferritin level was higher in the COVID-19 group (median, 809 [IQR, 442-1,330] vs median, 377 [IQR, 276-885]; P = 0.008). In multivariable analysis, only d-dimer (hazard ratio [HR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI],1-1.002; P = .02) and ferritin (HR, 1; 95% CI, 0.9-0.9; P = .02) increase the statistic signification.ConclusionCOVID-19 pneumonia in KT patients shows a different presentation of inflammatory biomarkers than other non-COVID pneumonias. It could be useful to identify KT patients with COVID-19. More detailed studies are necessary to understand the presentation of biomarkers in KT with COVID-19.     

Arthroscopically measured syndesmotic stability after screw vs. suture button fixation in a cadaveric model

BackgroundAppropriate management of ankle syndesmotic instability is needed to prevent the development of complications. Previous biomechanical studies have evaluated movement of the fibula after screw or suture button fixations with different results, most likely being caused by variations in experimental setups that did not mirror the in vivo clinical setting. This study aimed to arthroscopically compare in a cadaveric model the stability of syndesmotic fixation with either a suture button or syndesmotic screw.MethodsEight fresh matched pairs of human ankle cadaver specimens (above knee) underwent arthroscopic assessment with (1) intact ligaments, (2) after complete disruption, and (3) after repair with either a quadracortical syndesmotic screw or suture button construct. In every stage, four loading conditions were considered under 100N of direct force: 1) unstressed, 2) lateral hook test, 3) anterior to posterior (AP) translation test, and 4) posterior to anterior (PA) translation test. Coronal plane tibiofibular diastasis, as well as sagittal plane tibiofibular translation, were arthroscopically measured.ResultsCoronal plane anterior and posterior tibiofibular diastasis and sagittal plane tibiofibular translation were measured using probes of increasing diameters. Following screw fixation, syndesmotic stability was similar to the uninjured syndesmosis in the coronal plane (anterior, median 0.0 mm [IQR 0.0–0.3] vs. 0.3 mm [IQR 0.2–0.3]; p = 0.57; posterior, median 0.1 mm [IQR 0.0–0.4] vs. 0.2 mm [IQR 0.1–0.3]; p = 1.0) but more rigid in the sagittal plane (median 0.0 mm [IQR 0.0–0.1] vs. 1.0 mm [IQR 0.4–1.5]; p = 0.012). Repairing the unstable syndesmosis with a suture button construct resulted in coronal plane stability similar to the uninjured syndesmosis (anterior, median 0.2 mm [IQR 0.1–0.3] vs. 0.2 mm [IQR 0.1–0.3]; p = 0.48; posterior, median 0.2 mm [IQR 0.1–0.3] vs. 0.3 mm [IQR 0.1–0.5]; p = 0.44). However, sagittal plane fibular motion remained unstable as compared to the uninjured syndesmosis (median 2.2 mm [IQR 1.6–2.6] vs. 0.8 mm [IQR 0.4–1.3]; p = 0.012).ConclusionCurrent fixation methods for syndesmotic disruption maintain coronal plane fibular stability. Screw and suture button constructs, however, respectively resulted in greater or insufficient constraint to fibular motion in the sagittal plane as compared to the intact syndesmotic ligament. These findings suggest that neither traditional screw nor suture button fixations optimally stabilize the syndesmosis, which may have implications for postoperative care and clinical outcomes.     

Evaluation of an Electromagnetic 3D Navigation System to Facilitate Endovascular Tasks: A Feasibility Study

IntroductionWe describe a novel approach to arterial cannulation using the StealthStation^® Guidance System (Medtronic, USA). This uses electromagnetic technology to track the guidewire, displaying a 3D image of the vessel and guidewire.MethodsThe study was performed on a ‘bench top’ simulation model called the Cannulation Suite comprising of a silicone aortic arch model and simulated fluoroscopy. The accuracy of the StealthStation^® was assessed. 16 participants of varying experience in performing endovascular procedures (novices: 6 participants, ≤5 procedures performed; intermediate: 5 participants, 6–50 procedures performed; experts: 5 participants, >50 procedures performed) underwent a standardised training session in cannulating the left subclavian artery on the model with the conventional method (i.e. with fluoroscopy) and with the StealthStation^®. Each participant was then assessed on cannulating the left subclavian artery using the conventional method and with the StealthStation^®. Performance was video-recorded. The subjects then completed a structured questionnaire assessing the StealthStation^®.ResultsThe StealthStation^® was accurate to less than 1 mm [mean (SD) target registration error 0.56 mm (0.91)]. Every participant was able to complete the cannulation task with a significantly lower use of fluoroscopy with the navigation system compared with the conventional method [median 0 s (IQR 0–2) vs median 14 s (IQR 10–19), respectively; p = <0.001]. There was no significant difference between the StealthStation^® and conventional method for: total procedure time [median 17 s (IQR 9–53) vs median 21 s (IQR 11–32), respectively; p = 0.53]; total guidewire hits to the vessel wall [median 0 (IQR 0–1) vs median 0 (IQR 0–1), respectively; p = 0.86]; catheter hits to the vessel wall [median 0.5 (IQR 0–2) vs median 0.5 (IQR 0–1), respectively; p = 0.13]; and cannulation performance on the global rating scale [median score, 39/40 (IQR 28–39) vs 38/40 (IQR 33–40), respectively; p = 0.40]. The intra-class correlation coefficient for agreement between video-assessors for all scores was 0.99. 88% strongly agreed that the StealthStation^® can potentially decrease exposure of the patient to contrast and radiation.ConclusionArterial cannulation is feasible with the StealthStation^®.     

A cost analysis of treating postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip replacement surgery in a UK tertiary referral centre

AimThis study aims to evaluate costs associated with periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) treatment at a UK tertiary referral centre.MethodsThis study included 128 consecutive PFFs admitted from 02/04/2014–19/05/2020. Financial data were provided by Patient Level Information and Costing Systems. Primary outcomes were median cost and margin. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, blood transfusion, critical care, 30-day readmission, 2-year local complication, 2-year systemic complication, 2-year reoperation and 30-day mortality rates. Statistical comparisons were made between treatment type. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.ResultsAcross the cohort, median cost was £15,644.00 (IQR £11,031.00-£22,255.00) and median loss was £3757.50 (£599.20-£8296.20). The highest costs were ward stay (£3994.00, IQR £1,765.00-£7,013.00), theatre utilisation (£2962.00, IQR £0.00-£4,286.00) and overheads (£1705.10, IQR £896.70-£2432.20). Cost (£17,455.00 [IQR, £13,194.00-£23,308.00] versus £7697.00 [IQR £3871.00-£10,847.00], p<0.001) and loss (£4890.00 [IQR £1308.00-£10,009.00] versus £1882.00 [IQR £313.00-£3851.00], p = 0.02) were greater in the operative versus the nonoperative group. There was no difference in cost (£17,634.00 [IQR £12,965.00-£22,958.00] versus £17,399.00 [IQR £13,394.00-£23,404.00], p = 0.98) or loss (£5374.00 [IQR £1950.00-£10,143.00] versus £3860.00 [IQR -£95.50-£7601.00], p = 0.21) between the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and revision groups. More patients required blood transfusion in the operative versus the nonoperative group (17 [17.9%] versus 0 [0.0%], p = 0.009). There was no difference in any clinical outcome between the ORIF and revision groups (p>0.05).ConclusionPFF treatment costs are high with inadequate reimbursement from NHS tariff. Work is needed to address this disparity and reduce hospital costs. Cost should not be used to decide between ORIF and revision surgery.     

A Repeat Dose of Perioperative Dexamethasone Can Effectively Reduce Pain,Opioid Requirement,Time to Ambulation,and In-Hospital Stay After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundThe ideal dose of intravenous glucocorticoids to control pain in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. This randomized controlled trial compared postoperative pain and tramadol requirement in patients undergoing unilateral primary THA who received one versus two perioperative doses of dexamethasone.MethodsPatients consented to undergo blinded, simple randomization to either one (at anesthetic induction [1D-group]: 54 patients) or two (with an additional dose 8 hours after surgery [2D-group]: 61 patients) perioperative doses of 8-mg intravenous dexamethasone. Pain was evaluated with visual analog scale at 8, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively and with tramadol requirement. The secondary outcomes included postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to ambulation, and length of stay.ResultsAge (mean, 66 ± 13 years), body mass index (mean, 29 ± 5), gender (60% female), and history of diabetes were similar between groups (P >.05). Pain was higher at 16 (4 [interquartile range {IQR} 3-5] vs 2 [IQR 1-3]; P <.001) and 24 (2.5 [IQR 2-3] vs 1 [IQR 0-1] P <.001) hours postoperatively in the 1D-group patients. 1D-group patients had significantly more tramadol consumption (50 [IQR 50-100] vs 0 [IQR 0-50]; P = .01), as well as postoperative nausea and vomiting (18 [33.3%] vs 5 [8.2%]; P = .001). Fifty-five (90%) patients in the 2D-group and 32 (59%) in the 1D-group ambulated on postoperative day 0 (P = .0002). Fifty-eight (95%) patients in the 2D-group and 37 (68%) in the 1D-group were discharged on postoperative day 1 (P = .0002).ConclusionAn additional dose of dexamethasone at 8 hours postoperatively significantly reduced pain, tramadol consumption, time to ambulation, and length of stay after primary THA.     

Serologic response to COVID-19 infection or vaccination in pediatric kidney transplant recipients compared to healthy children

BackgroundDifferences in serologic response to COVID-19 infection or vaccination were reported in adult kidney transplant recipients (KTR) compared to non-immunocompromised patients. This study aims to compare the serologic response of naturally infected or vaccinated pediatric KTR to that of controls.MethodsThirty-eight KTR and 42 healthy children were included; aged ≤18 years, with a previously confirmed COVID-19 infection or post COVID-19 vaccination. Serological response was measured by anti-spike protein IgG antibody titers. Response post third vaccine was additionally assessed in KTR.ResultsFourteen children in each group had previously confirmed infection. KTR were significantly older and developed a 2-fold higher antibody titer post-infection compared to controls [median (interquartile range [IQR]) age: 14.9 (7.8, 17.5) vs. 6.3 (4.5, 11.5) years, p = 0.02; median (IQR) titer: 1695 (982, 3520) vs. 716 (368, 976) AU/mL, p = 0.03]. Twenty-four KTR and 28 controls were vaccinated. Antibody titer was lower in KTR than in controls [median (IQR): 803 (206, 1744) vs. 8023 (3032, 30,052) AU/mL, p < 0.001]. Fourteen KTR received third vaccine. Antibody titer post booster in KTR reached similar levels to those of controls post two doses [median (IQR) 5923 (2295, 12,278) vs. 8023 (3034, 30,052) AU/mL, p = 0.37] and to KTR post natural infection [5282 AU/mL (2583, 13,257) p = 0.8].ConclusionSerologic response to COVID-19 infection was significantly higher in KTR than in controls. Antibody level in KTR was higher in response to infection vs. vaccination, contrary to reports in the general population. Response to vaccination in KTR reached levels comparable to controls only after third vaccine.     

Retrospective study comparing outcomes of multimodal epidural and erector spinae catheter pain protocols after pectus surgery

IntroductionThere are no optimal postoperative analgesia regimens for Nuss procedures. We compared the effectiveness of thoracic epidurals (EPI) and novel ambulatory erector spinae plane (ESP) catheters as part of multimodal pain protocols after Nuss surgery.MethodsData on demographics, comorbidities, perioperative details, length of stay (LOS), in hospital and post discharge pain/opioid use, side effects, and emergency department (ED) visits were collected retrospectively in children who underwent Nuss repair with EPI (N = 114) and ESP protocols (N = 97). Association of the group with length of stay (LOS), in hospital opioid use (intravenous morphine equivalents (MEq)/kg over postoperative day (POD) 0–2), and oral opioid use beyond POD7 was analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with propensity scores, followed by multivariable regression.ResultsGroups had similar demographics. Compared to EPI, ESP had longer block time and higher rate of ketamine and dexmedetomidine use. LOS for ESP was 2 days IQR (2, 2) compared to 3 days IQR (3, 4) for EPI (p < 0.01). Compared to EPI, ESP group had higher opioid use (in MEq/kg) intraoperatively (0.32 (IQR 0.27, 0.36) vs. 0.28 (0.24, 0.32); p < 0.01) but lower opioid use on POD 0 (0.09 (IQR 0.04, 0.17) vs. 0.11 (0.08, 0.17); p = 0.03) and POD2 (0.00 (IQR 0.00, 0.00) vs. 0.04 (0.00, 0.06) ; p < 0.01). ESP group also had lower total in hospital opioid use (0.57 (IQR 0.42, 0.73) vs.0.82 (0.71, 0.91); p < 0.01), and shorter duration of post discharge opioid use (6 days (IQR 5,8) vs. 9 days (IQR 7,12) (p < 0.01). After IPTW adjustment, ESP continued to be associated with shorter LOS (difference -1.20, 95% CI: -1.38, -1.01, p < 0.01) and decreased odds for opioid use beyond POD7 (OR 0.11, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.24); p < 0.01). However, total in hospital opioid use in MEq/kg (POD0–2) was now similar between groups (difference -0.02 (95% CI: -0.09, -0.04); p = 0.50). The EPI group had higher incidence of emesis (29% v 4%, p < 0.01), while ESP had higher catheter malfunction rates (23% v 0%; p < 0.01) but both groups had comparable ED visits/readmissions.Discussion/conclusionCompared to EPI, multimodal ambulatory ESP protocol decreased LOS and postoperative opioid use, with comparable ED visits/readmissions. Disadvantages included higher postoperative pain scores, longer block times and higher catheter leakage/malfunction.Levels of evidenceLevel III     

The effects of paravertebral blockade usage on pulmonary complications,atrial fibrillation and length of hospital stay following thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery

Study objectiveAlthough combined thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPVB)-general anesthesia (GA) could improve pain control compared to GA alone after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, it has not been established whether this improvement in pain control could reduce associated adverse outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to explore the association between TPVB usage and adverse outcomes after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.DesignRetrospective cohort study from a prospective database.SettingA high-volume thoracic center in China.Patients13966 consecutive patients who received thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery from January 2016 to December 2018 in Shanghai Chest Hospital were enrolled.MeasurementsWith a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, adverse outcomes between GA alone and GA-TPVB were investigated. Multivariate and multiple linear regression analysis were used to identify factors and calculate odds radio (OR) for adverse outcomes.ResultsThe rate of TPVB usage was 14.8% (2070 out of 13,966). TPVB combined with GA was associated with lower rates of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) (30.4% vs 33.5%, P = 0.005) and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (2.1% vs 2.9%, P = 0.041), and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (Median [IQR]; 5[4-5] vs 5[4-6]) days, P < 0.001) compared to GA alone. After a 1:1 PSM analysis, we investigated adverse outcomes in 2640 (1320 pairs) patients with or without TPVB usage, and this association remained existed, namely, the rates of PPCs (29.8% vs 34.2%, P = 0.014) and POAF (2.2% vs 3.6%, P = 0.028) were lower and LOS was shorter (5[4-5] vs 5[4-6] days, P < 0.001) in the GA-TPVB group. In multivariate analysis, the combination of GA plus TPVB was independent predictor for PPCs (OR = 0.879, 95%CI, 0.793–0.974, P = 0.014) and POAF (OR = 0.714, 95%CI, 0.516–0.988, P = 0.042), respectively. However, in multiple linear analysis, lower rates of PPCs and POAF associated with TPVB usage, rather than TPVB usage, were responsible for the reduced LOS.ConclusionsThe usage of TPVB may be a feasible and adjustable approach to reduce the rates of PPCs and POAF and associated LOS in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.     

Post-injury outcomes of children with behavioral health disorders

BackgroundThe impact of Behavioral Health Disorders (BHDs) on pediatric injury is poorly understood. We investigated the relationship between BHDs and outcomes following pediatric trauma.MethodsWe analyzed injured children (age 5–15) from 2014 to 2016 using the Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared children with and without a comorbid BHD.ResultsOf 69,305 injured children, 3,448 (5%) had a BHD. These 3,448 children had a median of 1 [IQR: 1, 1] BHD diagnosis: ADHD (n = 2491), major psychiatric disorder (n = 1037), drug use disorder (n = 250), and alcohol use disorder (n = 29). A higher proportion of injured children with BHDs suffered intentional and penetrating injury. Firearm injuries were more common for BHD patients (3% vs 1%, p<0.001). Children with BHDs were more likely to have an ISS>25 compared to children without (5% vs 3%, p<0.001). While median LOS was longer for BHD patients (2 [1, 3] vs 2 [1, 4], p<0.001), mortality was similar (1% vs 1%, p = 0.76) and complications were less frequent (7% vs 8%, p = 0.002). BHD was associated with lower risk of mortality (OR 0.45, 95%CI [0.30, 0.69]) after controlling for age, sex, race, trauma type, and injury intent and severity.ConclusionChildren with BHDs experienced lower in-hospital mortality risk after traumatic injury despite more severe injury upon presentation. Intentional and penetrating injuries are particularly concerning, and future work should assess prevention efforts in this vulnerable group.     

Bacteremia in solid organ transplant recipients as compared to immunocompetent patients: Acute phase cytokines and outcomes in a prospective,matched cohort study

We undertook a prospective, matched cohort study of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) and gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) to compare the characteristics, outcomes, and chemokine and cytokine response in transplant recipients to immunocompetent, nontransplant recipients. Fifty-five transplant recipients (GNB n = 29; SAB n = 26) and 225 nontransplant recipients (GNB n = 114; SAB n = 111) were included for clinical analysis. Transplant GNB had a significantly lower incidence of septic shock than nontransplant GNB (10.3% vs 30.7%, p = .03). Thirty-day mortality did not differ significantly between transplant and nontransplant recipients with GNB (10.3% vs 15.8%, p = .57) or SAB (0.0% vs 11.7%, p = .13). Next, transplant patients were matched 1:1 with nontransplant patients for the chemokine and cytokine analysis. Five cytokines and chemokines were significantly lower in transplant GNB vs nontransplant GNB: IL-2 (median [IQR]: 7.1 pg/ml [7.1, 7.1] vs 32.6 pg/ml [7.1, 88.0]; p = .001), MIP-1β (30.7 pg/ml [30.7, 30.7] vs 243.3 pg/ml [30.7, 344.4]; p = .001), IL-8 (32.0 pg/ml [5.6, 53.1] vs 59.1 pg/ml [39.2, 119.4]; p = .003), IL-15 (12.0 pg/ml [12.0, 12.0] vs 12.0 pg/ml [12.0, 126.7]; p = .03), and IFN-α (5.1 pg/mL [5.1, 5.1] vs 5.1 pg/ml [5.1, 26.3]; p = .04). Regulated upon Activation, Normal T Cell Expressed and Secreted (RANTES) was higher in transplant SAB vs nontransplant SAB (mean [SD]: 750.2 pg/ml [194.6] vs 656.5 pg/ml [147.6]; p = .046).     

Incidence,Risk Factors,and Management of Incisional Hernias After Kidney Transplant: A 20-Year Single Center Experience

BackgroundIncisional hernias (IH) constitute a complication after kidney transplant (KT). Patients may be particularly at risk because of comorbidities and immunosuppression. The study aim was to assess the incidence, risk factors, and treatment of IH in patients undergoing KT.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent KT between January 1998 and December 2018. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative parameters, and IH repair characteristics were assessed. Postoperative outcomes included morbidity, mortality, need for reoperation, and length of stay (LOS). Patients who developed IH were compared with those who did not develop one.ResultsForty-seven patients (6.4%) developed an IH after a median delay of 14 months (IQR, 6-52 months) in 737 KTs. On uni- and multivariate analyses, body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.080; P = .020), pulmonary diseases (OR, 2.415; P = .012), postoperative lymphoceles (OR, 2.362; P = .018), and LOS (OR, 1.013; P = .044) were independent risk factors. Thirty-eight patients (81%) underwent operative IH repair, and 37 (97%) were treated with a mesh. The median LOS was 8 days (IQR, 6-11 days). Three patients (8%) developed surgical site infections, and 2 patients (5%) presented hematomas requiring surgical revision. After IH repair, 3 patients (8%) had a recurrence.ConclusionsThe incidence of IH after KT seems rather low. Overweight, pulmonary comorbidities, lymphoceles, and LOS were identified as independent risk factors. Strategies focusing on the modifiable patient-related risk factors and early detection and treatment of lymphoceles may help to decrease the risk of IH formation after KT.     

Persistent fibrinolysis shutdown is associated with increased mortality in traumatic pancreatic injury

PurposeThe features of fibrinolytic system modifications and their relationship with prognosis are still unknown in traumatic pancreatic injury. The object of this prospective cohort research was to identify fibrinolytic characteristics in patients with pancreatic trauma and to identify the correlation to mortality.MethodA prospective screening of traumatic pancreatic injury patients was done for five years. The fibrinolytic status of patients was determined by thromboelastography (TEG). The percentage reduction in clot strength 30 min (LY30) after the time of maximal clot strength was utilized to distinguish the fibrinolytic phenotype of individuals, including fibrinolytic shutdown (SD), physiologic fibrinolysis (PHYS) and hyperfibrinolysis (HF). Two cohorts, transient fibrinolytic shutdown (TSD) and persistent fibrinolytic shutdown (PSD), were divided according to whether fibrinolytic shutdown persisted within one week. Demographics, injury severity, characteristics of pancreatic injury, treatment, and outcomes were compared.ResultA total of 180 cases enrolled, aged 42(interquartile range 32–51) years, 88% males, 97% were blunt trauma. The median ISS was 19(IQR 10–25), and 76% were AAST grade III to V (high-grade). At admission, there were 159 cases of SD (88%), 15 cases of PHYS (8%) while 6 cases of HF (3%). Of these, the TSD cohort included 54 patients (34%), while the PSD cohort included 105 patients (66%). Compared with the TSD cohort, the PSD cohort had more severe injury (ISS 21[IQR 12–27] vs 16[IQR 9–22], p = 0.006) and a higher proportion of AAST high-grade (83% vs 67%, p = 0.035). Persistent fibrinolytic shutdown was associated with operative treatment (odds ratio [OR] 3.111; 95%CI 1.146–8.447; p = 0.026), associated intra-abdominal injury (OR 8.331; 95% CI 1.301–53.336; p = 0.025) and admission LY30 (OR 0.016; 95% CI 0.002 - 0.120; p < 0.001). It was an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.674; 95% CI 1.03 to 21.14; p = 0.045).ConclusionFibrinolytic shutdown especially persistence of this phenotype is more common in traumatic pancreatic injury than PHYS and HF, which related with mortality. Risk factors including LY30 at admission, intra-abdominal injury and operative treatment were associated with the persistent fibrinolytic shutdown. Sheltered the patients from these risk factors seems to be beneficial, which need to be confirmed by further large-scale studies.     

Evaluation of the Correlation Between Responders and Non-Responders to the Second Coronavirus Disease Vaccination In Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study

BackgroundThe immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients is significantly lower than that in healthy controls. We evaluated immune responses after the COVID-19 vaccine and their possible relationship with other cofactors in KTx recipients.MethodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study included 29 KTx recipients 2-8 weeks after receiving 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) immunoglobulin (Ig)-G levels were evaluated to define cofactors influencing the immune response between the responder (anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG level ≥0.8 U/mL) (n = 16) and nonresponder groups (anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG level <0.8 U/mL) (n = 13). The kinetics of antibodies between 2 and 6 months after the second vaccination was also compared between the groups.ResultsKTx recipients with IgG levels ≥0.8 U/mL were younger (54 [interquartile range {IQR}, 46.5-61] years vs 65 [IQR, 55-71.5] years; P = .01), had been transplanted for a longer median time (1588 [IQR, 1382-4751] days vs 1034 [IQR, 548.5-1833] days; P = .02), and were more often treated with a lower mycophenolate mofetil dosage (765.6 ± 119.6 vs 1077 ± 76.9 mg; P = .04) than KTx recipients with IgG levels <0.8 U/mL. There was no significant difference in antibody titers between time periods after the second dose in the responder group. At the 6-month follow-up, a serologic response against the SARS-CoV-2 S was observed in 44.4% of KTx recipients in the nonresponder group.ConclusionsMore than 50% of KTx recipients developed a higher antibody response after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination.     

The direct anterior approach is safe and shortens hospital length of stay following hemiarthroplasty for neck of femur fracture

ObjectiveTo investigate the safety of using the anterior approach (AA), compared to the lateral approach (LA), in hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced neck of femur fractures.DesignRetrospective case-control match cohort study.SettingLevel 1 trauma center.PatientsRetrospective review of prospectively collected data for 39 consecutive intracapsular hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty using an AA between 2017 and 2021. Patients operated with the AA were matched in 1:2 ratio with patients that had hemiarthroplasty via a LA.Main Outcome MeasuresDischarge destination, 90-day emergency room (ER) visit or readmission rate, inpatient and 90-day mortality rate, inpatient medical complications, 90-day mechanical complications, 90-day reoperation, and length of hospital stay (LOS).ResultsDischarge destination (p = 0.695), 90-day ER visit or readmission rate (p = 0.315), inpatient (p = 0.719) and 90-day mortality rate (p = 0.815), medical complications (p = 0.524), mechanical complications (p = 0.150) were similar between cohorts. Five patients, all in the LA-group, required re-operations within 90-days (p = 0.106). Patients in AA-group had shorter LOS (9.3 days, 95% CI [7.6–11.1] vs. 14.7 days [95% CI 12.2–17.3], p = 0.002).ConclusionsThe AA can be safely introduced for the treatment of hip fractures. Similar short-term outcomes relative to the LA were identified. The shorter LOS may reflect the improved early functional recovery offered from the muscle-sparing AA technique. Future, level-1 data should include early- and longer term functional outcome along with cost-effectiveness.     

Long-term results after standard endovascular aneurysm repair with the Endurant and Excluder stent grafts

ObjectiveMany endografts are currently available for standard endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comparison of long-term outcomes between devices might aid in this decision process, but comparative data are scarce. The purpose of this study was to report long-term clinical outcomes of two commercially available endoprosthesis, the Endurant (Medtronic Vascular, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) and the Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) stent grafts.MethodsPatients undergoing standard endovascular repair from July 2004 to December 2011 in a single institution with the Endurant or the Low-Porosity Excluder endografts were eligible. Only patients treated for intact degenerative abdominal infrarenal aneurysms were included. All measurements were performed on center-lumen line reconstructions obtained on dedicated software. The primary end point was primary clinical success, defined as clinical success without the need for an additional or secondary surgical or endovascular procedure. Neck-related events (a composite of type IA endoleak, neck-related secondary intervention, or migration of >5 mm), neck morphology changes, renal function, and overall survival were secondary end points.ResultsThe study included 277 patients (156 Endurants; 121 Excluders). The median follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 0.1-12.4 years) and did not differ between groups (P = .18). Patients treated with the Endurant stent graft had wider (neck diameter of >28 mm, 27.3% vs 1.7% [P < .001]; neck diameter of 27 mm, [interquartile range (IQR), 24-29 mm] for Endurant and 24 mm [IQR, 22-25 mm] for Excluder; P < .001) and more angulated necks (β-angle of >60°, 26.7% vs 12.5%; P = .004). Oversizing was greater in the Endurant group (16% [IQR, 12%-22%] vs 13% [IQR, 8%-17%], respectively; P < .001). Patients were treated outside device instructions for use regarding proximal neck: 16.7% in the Endurant and 17.3% in the Excluder group (P = .720). The 7-year primary clinical success was 54.7% for the Endurant and 58.1% for the Excluder groups (P = .53). Freedom from neck-related events at 7 years was 76.7% for the Endurant and 78.8% for Excluder group (P = .94). The Endurant stent graft (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-5.8; P = .009) was an independent predictor of significant renal function decline. Neck dilatation was greater in Endurant-implanted patients (13% [95% CI, 2%-22%] vs 4% [95% CI, 0%-10%]; P < .001). Overall survival at 7 years was 61.4% in the Endurant and 50.3% (n = 50; standard error, 0.047) in the Excluder group (P = .39).ConclusionsThis study reveals that durable and sustainable results can be obtained with either of these late generation devices. This finding suggests that careful planning and a tailored device selection taking into account the patient's anatomy are more relevant determinants than the graft model itself to obtain clinical success. The Endurant endoprosthesis seems to be associated with a higher rate of neck dilatation and faster decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, but further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine the clinical relevance of these findings.     

Role of preoperative posterior tilt on the outcomes of internal fixation of non-displaced femoral neck fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionThere has been an increased interest in the role of preoperative posterior tilt, as measured on lateral radiographs, on the outcomes of internal fixation of non-displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF). The goal was to assess the available evidence for this in the literature.Patients and methodsPRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched on June 10th, 2020 for studies assessing the role of posterior tilt on outcomes of internal fixation of non-displaced FNF. Primary outcomes were non-union and fixation failure, avascular necrosis (AVN), treatment failure, and reoperation (excluding symptomatic hardware removal). Outcomes were reported in Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals [CI].ResultsFourteen studies and 3729 patients were included (mean age 76 years, 72% female, mean follow-up 25 months). Moderate evidence was noted for the following: patients with greater preoperative posterior tilt had an increased risk of non-union and fixation failure (OR 2.4 [1.3 – 4.3]; p = 0.006), no increased risk of AVN (p = 0.550), an increased risk of treatment failure (OR 6.0 [2.2 – 15.9]; p<0.001) and reoperation (OR 2.5 [1.4 – 4.4]; p = 0.002). Furthermore, a greater preoperative tilt of 9.0° [4.1° – 13.9°] for treatment failure and 6.1° [3.7° – 8.5°] (p<0.001) for reoperation were noted in the unsuccessfully treated groups when compared to the successfully treated groups. Four studies found a threshold for posterior tilt ranging from 7° to 20°ConclusionThere is moderate evidence that patients with non-displaced FNF and greater tilt have an increased risk of unsuccessful outcomes following internal fixation. Older patients with a preoperative tilt of ≥20° might benefit from arthroplasty surgery, although studies assessing the optimal threshold are needed.     

Evaluation of atelectasis using electrical impedance tomography during procedural deep sedation for MRI in small children: A prospective observational trial

Study objectiveTo investigate the variation of poorly ventilated lung units (i.e., silent spaces) in children undergoing procedural sedation in a day-hospital setting, until discharge home from the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).DesignProspective, single-center, observational cohort trial.SettingThis study was conducted at the radiology department and in PACU at Bern University Hospital (Switzerland), a tertiary care hospital.PatientsWe included 25 children (1–6 years, ASA I-III) scheduled for cerebral magnetic resonance imaging scan, spontaneously breathing under deep sedation. Children planned for tracheal intubation, supraglottic airway insertion, or with contraindication for propofol were excluded.InterventionAfter intravenous or inhaled induction, deep sedation was performed with 10 mg/kg/h Propofol. All children received nasal oxygen 0.3 ml/kg/min.MeasurementsThe proportion of silent spaces and the global inhomogeneity index were determined at each of five procedural points, using electrical impedance tomography: before induction (T1); before (T2) and after (T3) magnetic resonance imaging; at the end of sedation before transport to the PACU (T4); and before hospital discharge (T5).Main resultsThe median [interquartile range (IQR)] proportion of silent spaces at the five analysis points were: T1, 5% [2%–14%]; T2, 10% [7%–14%]; T3, 12% [5%–23%]; T4, 12% [7%–24%]; and T5, 3% [2%–11%]. These defined significant changes in silent spaces over the course of sedation (p = 0.009), but no differences in silent spaces from before induction to before discharge from the PACU (T1 vs. T5; p = 0.29). Median [IQR] global inhomogeneity indices were 0.57 [0.55–0.58], 0.56 [0.53–0.59], 0.56 [0.54–0.59], 0.57 [0.54–0.60] and 0.56 [0.54–0.57], respectively (p = 0.93). None of the children reported anesthesia-related complications.ConclusionDeep sedation results in significantly increased poorly ventilated lung units during sedation. However, this does not significantly affect ventilation homogeneity, which was fully resolved at discharge from the PACU.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04507581